用户名: 密码: 验证码:
水资源综合模拟与调配模型WAS(Ⅱ):应用
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Water resources comprehensive allocation and simulation model(WAS),part Ⅱ.Application
  • 作者:桑学锋 ; 赵勇 ; 翟正丽 ; 常奂宇
  • 英文作者:SANG Xuefeng;ZHAO Yong;ZHAI Zhengli;CHANG Huanyu;State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin,China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research;
  • 关键词:水资源 ; 模拟 ; 调配 ; 校验 ; 水资源评价 ; 水资源管理
  • 英文关键词:water resources;;simulation;;allocation;;verification;;water resources assessment;;water resources management
  • 中文刊名:SLXB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
  • 机构:中国水利水电科学研究院流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:水利学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.50;No.509
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0401407,2016YFC0401306);; 国家自然科学基金项目(51679253);; 国家杰出青年科学基金项目(51625904)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SLXB201902006
  • 页数:8
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-1882/TV
  • 分类号:49-56
摘要
针对自然-社会水循环系统特点以及水资源管理实践需求,建立一种断面流量过程、断面特征频率径流总量、区域水资源配置总量多指标模型校验方法,并以甘肃省庆阳市为例开展WAS模型(Water Allocation and Simu?lation Model)构建与应用。模型在雨落坪站水文断面调参期(1967—1985年)年径流模拟的相关系数R2为0.89,Nash系数为0.79,校验期(1986—2000年)年径流模拟的相关系数R2为0.88,Nash系数为0.76;区域多年平均水资源总量模拟与实测误差为4.1%,25%、50%、75%和90%频率年误差分别为5.0%、1.1%、5.9%和4.2%;全市水资源配置总量误差为0.35%。在此基础上,提出庆阳市各水资源分区和行政分区的水资源配置方案以及全市自然-人工水资源循环转化图;分析表明,WAS模型在描述自然-社会水循环系统动态反馈方面具有一定优势,模型可以支撑水资源精细化评价和管理需求。
        Aiming at the characteristics of the natural-social water cycle system,a multi-dimension index model verification method for cross-section flow process,cross-section feature runoff volume,regional water allocation was established,and Qingyang City in Gansu Province is taken as an example to use the WAS model(Water Allocation and Simulation Model). The correlation coefficient R2 of runoff simulation in calibration period 1967-1985 of the Yuluoping cross-section was 0.89,and the Nash coefficient was 0.79. The correlation coefficient R2 of runoff simulation in validation period 1986-2000 was 0.88,and the Nash coefficient was 0.76. The average annual error of the simulation and measurement of regional water resources was4.1%,and the errors at frequency of 25%,50%,75% and 90% were 5.0%,1.1%,5.9% and 4.2%,respectively. The average error of the water allocation and measurement of Qingyang City was 0.35%. Based on the result,the water resources allocation plan for water supply of 284 million m3 and water consumption of 211 million m3 in the current year was put forward,and the decomposition map of regional water balance was given. The results show that WAS model can describe the dynamic feedback relationship between natural and social water circulation systems,and the model can also meet the accuracy requirements of water resources assessment and management.
引文
[1]倪红珍,王浩,汪党献.经济社会与生态环境竞争用水的水价研究[J].水资源保护,2008,24(3):73-76.
    [2]张智全.庆阳市生态承载力与生态环境评价研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2010.
    [3]黄小祥,姚成,李致家,等.栅格新安江模型在天津于桥水库流域上游的应用[J].湖泊科学,2016,28(5):1134-1140.
    [4]雷晓辉,贾仰文,蒋云钟,等. WEP模型参数自动优化及在汉江流域上游的应用[J].水利学报,2009,40(12):75-82.
    [5]赵勇,陆垂裕,肖伟华.广义水资源合理配置研究(Ⅱ)——模型[J].水利学报,2007,38(2):163-170.
    [6]史晓亮,李颖,杨志勇.基于SWAT模型的诺敏河流域径流对土地利用/覆被变化的响应模拟研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2016,27(1):65-69.
    [7]贾仰文,王浩,周祖昊,等.海河流域二元水循环模型开发及其应用——I.模型开发与验证[J].水科学进展,2010,21(1):1-8.
    [8]秦大庸,陆垂裕,刘家宏,等.流域“自然-社会”二元水循环理论框架[J].科学通报,2014(Z1):419-427.
    [9]桑学锋,王浩,王建华,等.水资源综合模拟与调配模型WAS(Ⅰ):模型原理与构建[J].水利学报,2018,49(12):1451-1459.
    [10]宋晓猛,张建云,占车生,等.水文模型参数敏感性分析方法评述[J].水利水电科技进展,2015,35(6):105-112.
    [11]田雨,雷晓辉,蒋云钟,等.水文模型参数敏感性分析方法研究评述[J].水文,2010,30(4):9-12,62.
    [12]王佩兰,赵人俊.新安江模型(三水源)参数的客观优选方法[J].河海大学学报,1989(4):65-69.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700