用户名: 密码: 验证码:
论采用脑死亡标准的伦理挑战
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Discussion on Ethical Challenge of Adopting Brain Death Standard
  • 作者:周吉银 ; 刘丹
  • 英文作者:ZHOU Jiyin;LIU Dan;National Drug Clinical Trial Institution,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University;
  • 关键词:死亡 ; 死亡 ; 死亡标准 ; 伦理原则 ; 伦理审查
  • 英文关键词:Brain Death;;Heart Death;;Death Standard;;Ethical Principle;;Ethical Review
  • 中文刊名:XNLX
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Medical Ethics
  • 机构:陆军军医大学第二附属医院国家药物临床试验机构;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-25
  • 出版单位:中国医学伦理学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.32
  • 基金:2017年陆军军医大学人文社会科学基金“临床科研项目伦理跟踪审查质量建设”(2017XRW23)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XNLX201902014
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:61-1203/R
  • 分类号:59-62
摘要
死亡一直被认为是死亡的唯一标准,脑死亡标准出现至今才30年,不同国家制定稍有不同的脑死亡标准。我国已制定脑死亡标准,执行脑死亡标准有利于维护逝者尊严、科学地判定死亡、卫生资源的合理利用、器官移植的开展和道德、法律责任的确定。生命自主抉择、动机纯正、严谨和审慎的原则是确立脑死亡作为死亡标准的伦理原则。推广脑死亡标准存在的挑战包括脑死亡法律缺失、死亡告知与知情同意难度大等,可采取强化知情同意、提升医生专业技能、向普通大众宣讲脑死亡标准和推行伦理审查等对策加以解决。
        Heart death has been considered as the sole standard of death. It has been only 30 years since the emergence of the standard of brain death. Different countries have formulated slightly different brain death standard. China has established brain death standard. The implementation of brain death standards is conducive tosafeguardingof the dignity of the deceased,judging the death scientifically,making rational use of health resources,carrying out organ transplantation and determining moral and legal responsibilities. The principles of self-determination of life,pure motivation,rigor and prudence are the ethical principles of establishing brain death as the standard of death. The challenges of promoting brain death standards include the lack of law on brain death,the difficulty of death notification and informed consent,etc. It can be solved by strengthening informed consent,improving the professional skills of doctors,publicizing brain death standards to the general public and carrying out ethical review.
引文
[1]Drake M,Bernard A,Hessel E.Brain Death[J].Surg Clin North Am,2017,97(6):1255.
    [2]Pamplona JL,Braz AM,Nunes RH.Brain Death[M].Springer:Springer International Publishing,2016.
    [3]陈忠华.脑死亡:现代死亡学[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    [4]卫生部脑死亡判定标准起草小组.脑死亡判定标准(成人)(修订稿)[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2009,6(4):220-220.
    [5]Gligorov N.A Defense of Brain Death[J].Neuroethics,2016,9(2):1-9.
    [6]Rady MY,Verheijde JL.Advancing neuroscience research in brain death:An ethical obligation to society[J].J Crit Care,2016,39:293-294.
    [7]Nelson HM,Glazier AK,Delmonico FL.Changing Patterns of Organ Donation:Brain Dead Donors Are Not Being Lost by Donation After Circulatory Death[J].Transplantation,2016,100(2):446.
    [8]陈忠华,袁劲.论自愿无偿器官捐献与脑死亡立法[J].中华医学杂志,2004,84(2):89-92.
    [9]Lewis A,Varelas P,Greer D.Controversies After Brain Death:When Families Ask for More[J].Chest,2016,149(2):607-608.
    [10]邱仁宗.脑死亡的伦理问题[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,18(2):30-33.
    [11]Dalle Ave AL,Gardiner D,Shaw DM.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of brain-dead organ donors:a literature review and suggestions for practice[J].Transpl Int,2016,29(1):12-19.
    [12]Lewis A,Greer D.Current controversies in brain death determination[J].Nature Reviews Neurology,2017:505-509.
    [13]Chang JJ,Tsivgoulis G,Katsanos AH,et al.Diagnostic Accuracy of Transcranial Doppler for Brain Death Confirmation:Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2016,37(3):408-414.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700