抢救室中无创通气治疗急性左心衰竭疗效观察

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Observation on the Curative Effect of Non-invasive Ventilation in Rescuing Patients With Acute Left Heart Failure 作者：邵松泽 ; 周新华 ; 孙成爱 ; 陈开祥 英文作者：SHAO Songze;ZHOU Xinhua;SUN Chengai;CHEN Kaixiang;Department of Emergency Medicine, Lianyungang Second People's Hospital; 关键词：早期 ; 无创正压通气 ; 急诊抢救室 ; 急性左心衰竭 ; 滞留时间 ; 症状缓解时间 英文关键词：early;;noninvasive positive pressure ventilation;;acute left heart failure;;emergency resuscitation room;;residence time;;symptom relief time 中文刊名：JXUY 英文刊名：China Continuing Medical Education 机构：江苏省连云港市第二人民医院急诊医学科; 出版日期：2018-12-30 出版单位：中国继续医学教育 年：2018 期：v.10 语种：中文; 页：JXUY201836030 页数：4 CN：36 ISSN：11-5709/R 分类号：83-86

摘要

目的探讨早期无创正压通气治疗急性左心衰竭在急诊抢救室中临床疗效观察。方法选择我院2016年1月—2018年1月急诊抢救室中诊断为急性左心衰竭患者60例作为研究对象。将其随机分为对照组(30例)和实验组(30例)。对照组给予常规抢救措施;实验组在常规抢救措施早期给予无创正压通气。观察治疗前及后15分钟、30分钟、60分钟、90分钟、120分钟的血压、心率、呼吸频率、血气分析,主诉症状缓解时间及抢救室滞留时间等指标。结果两组治疗后的血压、心率、呼吸频率及血气分析等临床指标均较治疗前有明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);采用无创正压通气的实验组总有效率为96.7%,采用常规抢救措施的对照组总有效率为70.0%,实验组高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论入抢救室即应用无创正压通气治疗急性左心衰竭时能迅速改善患者症状和低氧血症,减少患者在急诊抢救室滞留时间。
        Objective To investigate the clinical effect of early non-invasive positive pressure ventilation on acute left ventricular failure in emergency room. Methods 60 cases of patients with acute left heart failure diagnosed in emergency room of our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into control group(30 cases) and experimental group(30 cases). The control group was given routine rescue measures. The experimental group was given noninvasive positive pressure ventilation at the early stage of routine rescue measures. The blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood gas analysis, remission time of complaint symptoms and retention time of rescue room were observed before and after treatment for 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes. Results After treatment, the blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood gas analysis of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The total effective rate of the experimental group with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was 96.7%, and that of the control group with conventional rescue measures was 70.0%. The experimental group was higher than that of the control group, with statistical significance(P < 0.05). Conclusion Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation can improve the symptoms and hypoxemia of patients with acute left heart failure and reduce the duration of stay in the emergency room.

引文

[1]庄艳.重症监护室NPPV患者舒适护理模式临床应用效果研究[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(20):210-212.
    [2]闫静,李红.ICU机械通气患者呼吸困难的研究进展[J].护士进修杂志,2017,37(8):699-702.
    [3]陈锋,刘景峰,张万义.无创机械通气对重度急性左心衰疗效观察[J].河北医药,2014,33(16):2437-2438,2439.
    [4]王喆.《中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2014》解读[J].中国临床医生杂志,2016,44(5):14-16.
    [5]魏妤.2014年《中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南》主要亮点[J].中国临床医生杂志,2015,43(5):12-14.
    [6]宁正庆,侯超志,彭仁聪.吗啡在无创正压通气治疗急性左心衰中的应用研究[J].广西医学,2015,37(5):683-685.
    [7]呼吸困难诊断、评估与处理的专家共识组.呼吸困难诊断、评估与处理的专家共识[J].中华内科杂志,2014,53(4):337-341.
    [8]陈仲.无创呼吸机治疗急性左心衰的临床研究[J].中国当代医药,2015,22(34):46-48.
    [9]曹俊雄,朱志军,吴丹宁.冻干重组人脑利钠肽联合左西孟旦治疗急性心力衰竭的临床观察[J].中国药房,2016,27(8):1091-1093.
    [10]文辉,李永丽,韩小莹.机械通气联合常规疗法对重度急性左心衰竭患者的血气指标及临床疗效的影响[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(17):44-45.
    [11]李磊.无创呼吸机对急性心衰合并呼吸衰竭患者血气分析指标的影响[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2017,5(28):5,7.
    [12]翟金俊.急诊无创正压通气与常规疗法治疗成人急性心衰综合征的疗效[J].中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(22):65-66.
    [13]郭丹.BiPAP无创辅助通气治疗在老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者临床观察[J].心理医生,2017,23(28):80-81.
    [14]刘德智.探讨不同通气模式在重症肺源性心脏病呼吸衰竭中的应用效果[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(4):18-19.
    [15]陈锦暖,陈美华,吴雷.无创呼吸机不同通气模式治疗慢阻肺合并呼吸衰竭的临床疗效分析[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(34):11-12.