用户名: 密码: 验证码:
页岩气井压裂液返排对储层裂缝的损害机理
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Mechanism of fracture damage induced by fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas reservoirs
  • 作者:游利军 ; 谢本彬 ; 杨建 ; 康毅力 ; 韩慧芬 ; 王良 ; 杨斌
  • 英文作者:You Lijun;Xie Benbin;Yang Jian;Kang Yili;Han Huifen;Wang Liang;Yang Bin;State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation//Southwest Petroleum University;Engineering and Technology Research Institute,PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company;
  • 关键词:压裂液返排 ; 页岩气 ; 储层损害 ; 固相滞留 ; 水相圈闭 ; 微粒运移 ; 盐结晶 ; 四川盆地 ; 长宁区块 ; 早志留世
  • 英文关键词:Flowback of fracking fluid;;Shale gas;;Reservoir damage;;Solid phase retention;;Water phase trapping;;Particle migration;;Salt precipitation;;Sichuan Basin;;Changning Block;;Early Silurian
  • 中文刊名:TRQG
  • 英文刊名:Natural Gas Industry
  • 机构:"油气藏地质及开发工程"国家重点实验室·西南石油大学;中国石油西南油气田公司工程技术研究院;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-27 16:35
  • 出版单位:天然气工业
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.38;No.302
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“富有机质页岩氧化致裂增渗加速气体传输机理研究”(编号:51674209);; 四川省高校科技成果转化重大培育项目“富有机质页岩气藏提高采收率方法”(编号:17CZ0040);; 中国石油西南油气田公司2017年科研项目“长宁区块页岩与压裂液作用机理及返排规律研究”(编号:20170302-03)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TRQG201812008
  • 页数:9
  • CN:12
  • ISSN:51-1179/TE
  • 分类号:67-75
摘要
为了弄清压裂液返排过程中对页岩气储层裂缝的损害机理,选取四川盆地长宁区块下志留统龙马溪组页岩和压裂返排液,利用压裂返排液对造缝岩样开展压裂液返排和气驱压裂液实验,监测压裂液返排流动阶段的岩样液相渗透率、返排液固相粒度分布和浊度变化,对比压裂液气驱前后的气测渗透率,分析压裂返排液对页岩气储层中裂缝的损害机理与损害程度。研究结果表明:(1)压裂返排液作用后,页岩渗透率损害率介于53.1%~97.6%,返排液固相粒度区间显著缩小,液相滞留所造成的相圈闭损害、固相残渣堵塞、气相携液诱发微粒运移和盐结晶是其主要的损害方式;(2)气相流阶段,渗透率损害率降至23.1%~80.2%,滞留液相损害有所缓解,但固相残渣堵塞和返排液在裂缝面的盐结晶损害仍然难以避免;(3)基于页岩气井压裂液返排过程中对裂缝的损害机理,考虑到返排液的处理难度及其对储层裂缝的损害,建议应积极发挥压裂液的造缝能力,优化压裂液性质与用量,尽量做到不返排或少返排压裂液。
        In this paper, the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale samples and the backflow fracking fluid in the Changning Block of the Sichuan Basin were selected to investigate the damage mechanism of retained fracking fluid to fractures in shale gas reservoirs. Thus, experiments were conducted on fracking fluid backflow and gas-driving fracking fluids. The changes of liquid permeability of shale samples, solid particle size distribution and turbidity of the backflow fraking fluid were monitored. The gas permeability before and after fracking fluid gas drive was compared, and the damage degree and mechanism of the backflow fracking fluid to the fractures in shale samples were analyzed. And the following research results were obtained. First, the damage rate of shale permeability after the fracking fluid backflow is between 53.1% and 97.6%, and the range of the solid particle size of the flowback fluid is significantly reduced. The main reservoir damage modes include phase trapping damage caused by liquid phase retention, blockage caused by the solid phase residue, particle migration induced by gas-carrying liquid and salt precipitation. Second, in the stage of gas phase flow, the damage rate of permeability drops to 23.1–80.2%, and the damage caused by liquid phase retention is relieved, but the damage caused by the blockage of solid phase residue and the salt precipitation of flowback on the facture surface is inevitable. Third, based on the damage mechanism of fracking fluid backflow in shale gas wells to fractures, considering the treatment difficulty of the flowback and its damage to reservoir fractures, it is recommended to give a full play to the fracturing capacity of fracking fluid and optimize the properties and dosages of fracking fluid so as to reduce the flowback of fracking fluid as much as possible.
引文
[1]邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,李新景,黄金亮,王淑芳等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二)[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):166-178.Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Yuman,Li Xinjing,Huang Jinliang,Wang Shufang,et al.Shale gas in China:Characteristics,challenges and prospects(II)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):166-178.
    [2]Dong Z,Holditch SA&Mcvay DA.Resource evaluation for shale gas reservoirs[C]//Paper 152066-MS presented at the SPEHydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference,6-8 February2012,The Woodlands,Texas,USA.
    [3]Vincent MC.The next opportunity to improve hydraulic-fracture stimulation[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,2012,64(3):118-127.
    [4]韩慧芬,贺秋云,王良.长宁区块页岩气井排液技术现状及攻关方向探讨[J].钻采工艺,2017,40(4):69-71.Han Huifen,He Qiuyun&Wang Liang.The current situation of flowback technology and its further development research for shale-gas wells in Changning block[J].Drilling&Production Technology,2017,40(4):69-71.
    [5]Xu YM,Dehghanpour H,Ezulike O&Virues C.Effectiveness and time variation of induced fracture volume:Lessons from water flowback analysis[J].Fuel,2017,210:844-858.
    [6]Mueller M&Amro M.Indentaion hardness for improved proppant embedment prediction in shale formations[C]//Paper174227-MS presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition,3-5 June 2015,Budapest,Hungary.
    [7]Arshadi M,Zolfaghari A,Piri M,Al-Muntasheri GA&Sayed M.The effect of deformation on two-phase flow through proppant-packed fractured shale samples:A micro-scale experimental investigation[J].Advances in Water Resources,2017,105:108-131.
    [8]Zolfaghari A,Dehghanpour H,Noel M&Bearinger D.Laboratory and field analysis of flowback water from gas shales[J].Journal of Unconventional Oil&Gas Resources,2016,14:113-127.
    [9]He C,Li M,Liu WS,Barbot E&Vidic RD.Kinetics and equilibrium of barium and strontium sulfate formation in Marcellus shale flowback water[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2014,140(5):244-248.
    [10]Zhou QM,Dilmore R,Kleit AN&Wang JY.Evaluating fracturing fluid flowback in Marcellus using data mining technologies[C]//Paper 173364-MS presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference,3-5 February 2015,The Woodlands,Texas,USA.
    [11]Haluszczak LO,Rose AW&Kump LR.Geochemical evaluation of flowback brine from Marcellus gas wells in Pennsylvania,US-A[J].Applied Geochemistry,2013,28(3):55-61.
    [12]康毅力,陈强,游利军,王巧智,杨斌,俞杨烽.页岩气藏水相圈闭损害实验研究及控制对策--以四川盆地东部龙马溪组露头页岩为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(6):87-91.Kang Yili,Chen Qiang,You Lijun,Wang Qiaozhi,Yang Bin&Yu Yangfeng.Laboratory investigation of water phase trapping damage in shale gas reservoir-A case of Longmaxi shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(6):87-91.
    [13]游利军,王飞,康毅力,方朝合,陈强.页岩气藏水相损害评价与尺度性[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(11):2023-2029.You Lijun,Wang Fei,Kang Yili,Fang Chaohe&Chen Qiang.Evaluation and scale effect of aqueous phase damage in shale gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(11):2023-2029.
    [14]康毅力,张晓怡,游利军,陈强,张杜杰,崔忠余.页岩气藏自然返排缓解水相圈闭损害实验研究[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(6):819-827.Kang Yili,Zhang Xiaoyi,You Lijun,Chen Qiang,Zhang Dujie&Cui Zhongyu.The experimental research on spontaneous flowback relieving aqueous phase trapping damage in shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(6):819-827.
    [15]Ferrar KJ,Michanowicz DR,Christen CL,Mulcahy N,Malone SL&Sharma RK.Assessment of effluent contaminants from three facilities discharging Marcellus shale wastewater to surface waters in Pennsylvania[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2013,47(7):3472-3481.
    [16]Nicot JP,Scanlon BR,Reedy RC&Costley RA.Source and fate of hydraulic fracturing water in the Barnett shale:A historical perspective[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2014,48(4):2464-2471.
    [17]Kargbo DM,Wilhelm RG&Campbell DJ.Natural gas plays in the Marcellus shale:Challenges and potential opportunities[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2010,44(15):5679-5684.
    [18]Gregory KB,Vidic RD&Dzombak DA.Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing[J].Elements,2011,7(3):181-186.
    [19]Civan F.Reservoir formation damage:Fundamentals,modeling,assessment,and mitigation[M].Houston:Gulf Publishing Company,2007.
    [20]Paukert Vankeuren AN,Hakala JA,Jarvis K&Moore JE.Mineral reactions in shale gas reservoirs:Barite scale formation from reusing produced water as hydraulic fracturing fluid[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2017,51(16):9391-9402.
    [21]郭建春,何春明.压裂液破胶过程伤害微观机理[J].石油学报,2012,33(6):1018-1022.Guo Jianchun&He Chunming.Microscopic mechanism of the damage caused by gelout process of fracturing fluids[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(6):1018-1022.
    [22]Xu CY,Kang YL,You ZJ&Chen MJ.Review on formation damage mechanisms and processes in shale gas reservoir:Known and to be known[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2016,36:1208-1219.
    [23]Zhang JJ,Kamenov A,Zhu D,&Hill AD.Development of new testing procedures to measure propped fracture conductivity considering water damage in clay-rich shale reservoirs:An example of the Barnett Shale[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2015,135:352-359.
    [24]Wu XH,Pu Hui,Zhu KL,&Lu SQ.Formation damage mechanisms and protection technology for Nanpu nearshore tight gas reservoir[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,158:509-515.
    [25]卢拥军.压裂液对储层的损害及其保护技术[J].钻井液与完井液,1995,12(5):36-43.Lu Yongjun.Reservoir damage due to fracturing fluids and its protection[J].Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid,1995,12(5):36-43.
    [26]You LJ,Chen Q,Kang YL,Yu YF&He JA.Evaluation of formation damage using microstructure fractal in shale reservoirs[J].Fractals,2015,23(1):1540008-1540015.
    [27]You LJ,Kang YL,Chen ZX,Chen Q&Yang B.Wellbore instability in shale gas wells drilled by oil-based fluids[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics&Mining Sciences,2014,72:294-299.
    [28]Kaufman PB,Penny GS&Paktinat J.Critical evaluation of additives used in shale slickwater fracs[C]//Paper 119900-MSpresented at the SPE Shale Gas Production Conference,16-18November 2008,Fort Worth,Texas,USA.
    [29]刘文士,廖仕孟,向启贵,翟圣佳,翁帮华.美国页岩气压裂返排液处理技术现状及启示[J].天然气工业,2013,33(12):158-162.Liu Wenshi,Liao Shimeng,Xiang Qigui,Zhai Shengjia&Weng Banghua.Status quo of fracturing flowback fluids treatment technologies of US shale gas wells and its enlightenment for China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(12):158-162.
    [30]贺承祖,华明琪.水锁效应研究[J].钻井液与完井液,1996,13(6):13-15.He Chengzu&Hua Mingqi.The research of waterblock[J].Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid,1996,13(6):13-15.
    [31]Wu KL,Chen ZX&Li XF.Real gas transport through nanopores of varying cross-section type and shape in shale gas reservoirs[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2015,281:813-825.
    [32]Wu KL,Li XF,Wang CC,Yu W&Chen ZX.A model for gas transport in micro fractures of shale and tight gas reservoirs[C]//Paper 175906-MS presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference,20-22 October 2015,Calgary,Alberta,Canada.
    [33]Wu KL,Li XF,Guo CH,Wang CC&Chen ZX.A unified model for gas transfer in nanopores of shale-gas reservoirs:Coupling pore diffusion and surface diffusion[J].SPE Journal,2016,21(5):1583-1611.
    [34]刘大伟,康毅力,雷鸣,李大奇,刘永良.保护碳酸盐岩储层屏蔽暂堵技术研究进展[J].钻井液与完井液,2008,25(5):57-61.Liu Dawei,Kang Yili,Lei Ming,Li Daqi&Liu Yongliang.Research Progresses in temporary plugging technology for carbonate reservoir protection[J].Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid,2008,25(5):57-61.
    [35]方朝合,黄志龙,王巧智,郑德温,刘洪林.富含气页岩储层超低含水饱和度成因及意义[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(3):471-476.Fang Chaohe,Huang Zhilong,Wang Qiaozhi,Zheng Dewen&Liu Honglin.Cause and significance of the ultra-low water saturation in gas-enriched shale reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(3):471-476.
    [36]游利军,王巧智,康毅力,刘洪林,方朝合.压裂液浸润对页岩储层应力敏感性的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(6):102-106.You Lijun,Wang Qiaozhi,Kang Yili,Liu Honglin&Fang Chaohe.Influence of fracturing fluid immersion on stress sensitivity of shale reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(6):102-106.
    [37]Zeng HB,Wu KL,Cui X&Chen ZX.Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow:Insights and perspectives[J].Nano Today,2017,16:7-8.
    [38]Zolfaghari A,Holyk J,Tang YZ,Dehghanpour H&Bearinger D.Flowback Chemical Analysis:An Interplay of Shale-water Interactions[R]//Paper 176911-MS presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition,9-11November 2015,Brisbane,Australia.
    [39]Haluszczak LO,Rose AW&Kump LR.Geochemical evaluation of flowback brine from Marcellus gas wells in Pennsylvania,US-A[J].Applied Geochemistry,2013,28:55-61.
    [40]Wattenbarger RA&Alkouh AB.New Advances in shale reservoir analysis using flowback data[C]//Paper 165721-MS presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting,20-22 August 2013,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USA.
    [41]Bybee K.Salt precipitation in gas reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,2009,61(11):77-79.
    [42]汤勇,杜志敏,蒋红梅,孙雷.高温高压气藏地层水盐析引起的储层伤害[J].石油学报,2012,33(5):859-863.Tang Yong,Du Zhimin,Jiang Hongmei&Sun Lei.Reservoir damages caused by formation-water salt precipitation in high-pressure and high-temperature gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(5):859-863.
    [43]杨斌.基于气体扩散能力的页岩储层损害评价方法[D].成都:西南石油大学,2015.Yang Bin.Formation damage assessment based on gas diffusion ability in shale gas reservoir[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2015.
    [44]杜殿发,赵艳武,张婧,刘长利,唐建信.页岩气渗流机理研究进展及发展趋势[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(4):136-144.Du Dianfa,Zhao Yanwu,Zhang Jing,Liu Changli&Tang Jianxin.Progress and trends in shale gas seepage mechanism research[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science&Technology Edition),2017,39(4):136-144.
    [45]Gupta A,Xu M,Dehghanpour H&Bearinger D.Experimental investigation for microscale stimulation of shales by water imbibition during the shut-in periods[C]//Paper 185058-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference,15-16 February 2017,Calgary,Alberta,Canada.
    [46]钱斌,朱炬辉,杨海,梁兴,尹丛彬,石孝志,等.页岩储集层岩心水化作用实验[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(4):615-621.Qian Bin,Zhu Juhui,Yang Hai,Liang Xing,Yin Congbin,Shi Xiaozhi,et al.Experiments on shale reservoirs plugs hydration[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(4):615-621.
    [47]Butkovskyi A,Faber AH,Wang Y,Grolle K,Hofman-Caris R,Bruning H,et al.Removal of organic compounds from shale gas flowback water[J].Water Research,2018,138:47-55.
    [48]杨德敏,喻元秀,梁睿,夏宏,袁建梅.我国页岩气开发环境影响评价现状、问题及建议[J].天然气工业,2018,38(8):119-125.Yang Demin,Yu Yuanxiu,Liang Rui,Xia Hong&Yuan Jianmei.Environment impact appraisal(EIA)for shale gas development in China:Present status,existing issues and proposals[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(8):119-125.
    [49]游利军,程秋洋,康毅力,田键,杨斌.页岩裂缝网络水相自吸试验[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(1):82-89.You Lijun,Cheng Qiuyang,Kang Yili,Tian Jian&Yang Bin.Experimental study on spontaneous water imbibition in fracture networks of shale rocks[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2018,42(1):82-89.
    [50]游利军,康毅力,陈强,方朝合,杨鹏飞.氧化爆裂提高页岩气采收率的前景[J].天然气工业,2017,37(5):53-61.You Lijun,Kang Yili,Chen Qiang,Fang Chaohe&Yang Pengfei.Prospect of shale gas recovery enhancement by oxidation-induced rock burst[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(5):53-61.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700