摘要
基于2010—2017年A股新能源汽车上市公司的微观数据,以税收优惠和财政补贴为考察对象,运用灰色关联度模型分析企业盈利能力、成长能力、技术水平、研发投入与新能源汽车企业财政补贴、税收优惠的关联关系。结果表明:税收优惠与新能源汽车盈利能力、技术水平、研发投入的关联度较高,而财政补贴与企业发展能力的关联度也较高。针对研究得出的税收优惠和财政补贴力度对新能源汽车企业发展的关联关系,从税收优惠和财政补贴两个层面提出建议,旨在促进新能源汽车企业发展。
According to the 2010-2017 micro-data of major A-share listed companies engaging in new-energy vehicle,the tax preference and financial subsidies was taken as the survey objects. Meanwhile,the grey relational model was adopted to analyze the association among corporate profitability,growth capacity,technology level,R&D investment,fiscal subsidies to new-energy vehicle enterprises and tax preference. The research results indicated that tax preference presented high correlation with profitability,technology level and R&D investment of new-energy vehicles,fiscal subsidies showed high correlation with corporate development capabilities. Based on the correlation between tax preference as well as fiscal subsidies with the development of new-energy vehicle enterprises as concluded by the research,this paper put forward suggestions from two perspectives including tax preference and fiscal subsidies,so as to promote the development of new-energy vehicle enterprises.
引文
[1]李绍萍,李悦.新能源汽车企业R&D投入与税收政策的关联关系[J].技术经济,2016,35(4)∶32-36.
[2]廖家勤,孙小英.新能源汽车财税政策效应研究[J].税务与经济,2017,(1)∶86-93.
[3]张国强,汤向俊.区域战略性新兴产业竞争力比较:以长三角、珠三角和京津冀为例[J].经济问题探索,2017,(8)∶42-47.
[4]刘兰剑,赵志华.财政补贴退出后的多主体创新网络运行机制仿真——以新能源汽车为例[J].科研管理,2016,37(8)∶58-66.
[5]于颖哲,吕洪涛,李明磊.新能源汽车产业税收政策的选择[J].国际税收,2018,(11)∶73-76.
[6]高秀平.我国新能源汽车财税政策的国际借鉴[J].理论探索,2018,(2)∶111-115.
[7]逄琳.我国新能源汽车政府扶持补贴政策探析[D].北京:北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2017.
[8]李苏秀,刘颖琦,王静宇,等.市场环境与中国新能源汽车产业发展政策剖析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(9)∶158-166.
[9]袁博.中国新能源汽车产业发展战略及路径研究[J].区域经济评论,2017,(6)∶126-134.
[10]马亮,仲伟俊,梅姝娥.财政补贴、准入限制与新能源汽车产业发展[J].上海经济研究,2017,(4)∶17-25.
[11]李振宇,任文坡,黄格省,等.我国新能源汽车产业发展现状及思考[J].化工进展,2017,36(7)∶2337-2343.
[12]蒋姗芸.促进新能源汽车发展的税收优惠政策研究[D].上海:上海海关学院硕士学位论文,2017.
[13]程肖君,李少林.供给侧改革背景下新能源汽车产业发展策略研究[J].理论学刊,2018,(2)∶78-86.
[14]冯光.汽车产业转型升级下的新能源行业变革趋势[J].新型工业化,2018,8(1)∶78-83.