复杂山地高含硫集输管道剩余强度评价技术研究
|
摘要
目前,腐蚀管道剩余强度评价标准和评价体系方法日趋成熟,但并不是每个剩余强度公式均适用于所有类型地面集输管道的安全评估,合理选择剩余强度公式至关重要。为此,选取10个腐蚀管道剩余强度评价模型,结合国内某高含硫气田腐蚀管段的智能检测、开挖及测试数据,对这10种评价模型进行系统计算研究,结果表明:强度理论法的计算结果能有效说明腐蚀深度对集输管道最大安全工作压力的影响,且应用范围广,计算结果安全系数最高;其次为SY/T 6477—2014,再次是API 579和PCORRC方法;修正ASME B31G、ASMEB31G—2009准则和RSTRENG方法计算结果基本相同。该研究结果为复杂山地高含硫集输管道合理选择剩余强度公式提供了理论依据。
At present, the studies on the evaluation standard and system of the residual strength for corroded pipelines are getting mature,but not each residual strength formula is applicable for safety assessment of all types of surface gathering and transportation pipelines, and how to choose the residual strength formula is of great importance.Therefore,ten residual strength evaluation models for corroded pipelines are selected and systematically calculated and studied combined with the intelligent detection,excavation and testing data of corroded pipelines in a domestic gas field with high sulfur.Results show that the calculation result of strength theory can effectively explain the influence of corrosion depth on maximum safe working pressure of gathering and transportation pipelines,and its safety factor is the highest, then the SY/T 6477—2014, and then the API 579 and PCORRC method; results of modified ASME B31G, ASMEB31G—2009 and RSTRENG method are basically the same. The study provides theoretical basis for reasonably choosing the residual strength formula of gathering and transportation pipelines with high sulfur in complex mountainous areas.
At present, the studies on the evaluation standard and system of the residual strength for corroded pipelines are getting mature,but not each residual strength formula is applicable for safety assessment of all types of surface gathering and transportation pipelines, and how to choose the residual strength formula is of great importance.Therefore,ten residual strength evaluation models for corroded pipelines are selected and systematically calculated and studied combined with the intelligent detection,excavation and testing data of corroded pipelines in a domestic gas field with high sulfur.Results show that the calculation result of strength theory can effectively explain the influence of corrosion depth on maximum safe working pressure of gathering and transportation pipelines,and its safety factor is the highest, then the SY/T 6477—2014, and then the API 579 and PCORRC method; results of modified ASME B31G, ASMEB31G—2009 and RSTRENG method are basically the same. The study provides theoretical basis for reasonably choosing the residual strength formula of gathering and transportation pipelines with high sulfur in complex mountainous areas.
引文
[1]刘永寿,王文,冯震宙,等.腐蚀管道的剩余强度与可靠性分析[J].强度与环境,2008,35(3):52-57.
[2]姜晓红,李力耘,付桂英.管道缺陷评估方法[J].油气储运,2005,24(增刊1):52-54.
[3]王利波.腐蚀管道剩余强度评价及剩余寿命预测软件开发[D].西安:西安石油大学,2014.
[4]刘颖,廖柯熹,刘长林,等.含腐蚀缺陷管道的剩余强度评价方法[J].天然气与石油,2008,26(2):41-44.
[5]白清东.腐蚀管道剩余强度研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2006.
[6]刘海峰,王毅辉.在役油气压力管道腐蚀剩余强度评价方法探讨[J].天然气工业,2001,21(6):90-92.
[7]王春兰,张鹏,陈利琼,等.腐蚀管道剩余强度评价的基本方法[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2003,35(5):50-54.
[8]张兆贵,崔铭伟.双点蚀缺陷管道剩余强度计算方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2015,36(8):758-764.
[9]郭淑娟,陈保东,韦丽娃,等.几种含体积型腐蚀缺陷管道剩余强度评价方法的特点及适用性[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2008,20(5):364-366.
[10]付道明,孙军,贺志刚,等.预测腐蚀管道剩余强度的新方法[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2004,16(4):12-18.
[11]俞茂宏,YOSHIMINE M,强洪夫,等.强度理论的发展和展望[J].工程力学,2004,21(6):1-20.
[12]王旭东,徐杰,孙冬柏,等.国外油气管道缺陷评估方法评价[J].机械工程材料,2009,33(4):6-13.
[13]MA B,SHUAI J,WANG J,et al.Analysis on the latest assessment criteria of ASME B31G—2009 for the remaining strength of corroded pipelines[J].Journal of Failure Analysis&Prevention,2011,11(6):666-671.
[14]American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Manual of determining the remaining strengthof corroded pipelines:ASME B31G—2009[S].New York:ASME,2009.
[15]王禹钦,王维斌,冯庆善.腐蚀管道的剩余强度评价[J].腐蚀与防护,2008,29(1):28-31.
[16]BISAGGIO H D C,NETTO T A.Predictive analyses of the integrity of corroded pipelines based on concepts of structural reliability and Bayesian inference[J].Marine Structures,2015(41):180-199.
[17]帅健.腐蚀管线的剩余寿命预测[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(4):91-93.
[18]陈健峰,韩恩厚,张华兵.钢质管道管体腐蚀损伤评价方法:SY/T 6151—2009[S].北京:中国石油天然气股份有限公司管道分公司,2009:1-7.
[19]张广利,罗金恒,董保胜.含缺陷油气输送管道剩余强度评价方法:SY/T 6477—2014[S].北京:中国石油天然气股份有限公司管道分公司,2014:1-10.
[20]何蕴增,杨丽红.基础材料力学[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:53-62.
[21]高松巍,邵娜,杨理践.API579准则评价均匀腐蚀管道剩余强度[J].沈阳工业大学学报,2011,33(3):288-292.
[2]姜晓红,李力耘,付桂英.管道缺陷评估方法[J].油气储运,2005,24(增刊1):52-54.
[3]王利波.腐蚀管道剩余强度评价及剩余寿命预测软件开发[D].西安:西安石油大学,2014.
[4]刘颖,廖柯熹,刘长林,等.含腐蚀缺陷管道的剩余强度评价方法[J].天然气与石油,2008,26(2):41-44.
[5]白清东.腐蚀管道剩余强度研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2006.
[6]刘海峰,王毅辉.在役油气压力管道腐蚀剩余强度评价方法探讨[J].天然气工业,2001,21(6):90-92.
[7]王春兰,张鹏,陈利琼,等.腐蚀管道剩余强度评价的基本方法[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2003,35(5):50-54.
[8]张兆贵,崔铭伟.双点蚀缺陷管道剩余强度计算方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2015,36(8):758-764.
[9]郭淑娟,陈保东,韦丽娃,等.几种含体积型腐蚀缺陷管道剩余强度评价方法的特点及适用性[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2008,20(5):364-366.
[10]付道明,孙军,贺志刚,等.预测腐蚀管道剩余强度的新方法[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2004,16(4):12-18.
[11]俞茂宏,YOSHIMINE M,强洪夫,等.强度理论的发展和展望[J].工程力学,2004,21(6):1-20.
[12]王旭东,徐杰,孙冬柏,等.国外油气管道缺陷评估方法评价[J].机械工程材料,2009,33(4):6-13.
[13]MA B,SHUAI J,WANG J,et al.Analysis on the latest assessment criteria of ASME B31G—2009 for the remaining strength of corroded pipelines[J].Journal of Failure Analysis&Prevention,2011,11(6):666-671.
[14]American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Manual of determining the remaining strengthof corroded pipelines:ASME B31G—2009[S].New York:ASME,2009.
[15]王禹钦,王维斌,冯庆善.腐蚀管道的剩余强度评价[J].腐蚀与防护,2008,29(1):28-31.
[16]BISAGGIO H D C,NETTO T A.Predictive analyses of the integrity of corroded pipelines based on concepts of structural reliability and Bayesian inference[J].Marine Structures,2015(41):180-199.
[17]帅健.腐蚀管线的剩余寿命预测[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(4):91-93.
[18]陈健峰,韩恩厚,张华兵.钢质管道管体腐蚀损伤评价方法:SY/T 6151—2009[S].北京:中国石油天然气股份有限公司管道分公司,2009:1-7.
[19]张广利,罗金恒,董保胜.含缺陷油气输送管道剩余强度评价方法:SY/T 6477—2014[S].北京:中国石油天然气股份有限公司管道分公司,2014:1-10.
[20]何蕴增,杨丽红.基础材料力学[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:53-62.
[21]高松巍,邵娜,杨理践.API579准则评价均匀腐蚀管道剩余强度[J].沈阳工业大学学报,2011,33(3):288-292.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |