摘要
1956年,杨振宁、李政道为解开"θ-τ之谜"提出了质疑宇称守恒在弱相互作用中是否成立的科学假说,吴健雄率先验证了在弱相互作用中宇称不守恒。但在获得实验结果后,她却缺乏"抢先发表"成果的意识,有意延缓成果发表,导致另两个实验小组后来赶上。而首先发表是科学发现优先权归属所依据的准则,依据这一准则,吴健雄丧失了独占实验发现的优先权,从而丧失了分享诺贝尔物理学奖这一殊荣的良机。这一诺贝尔奖案例给我们的启示是,在激烈的全球科学竞技场上,科研人员应当具备科学成果抢先发表的意识。
To solve the θ-τ puzzle,Chen-Ning Yang and Tsung-Dao Lee questioned that whether the parity conservation is correct or not in weak interaction,and Chien-Shiung Wu verified the scientific hypotheses of weak interaction parity violation in 1956. Unfortunately,Chien-Shiung Wu did not delivered the experiment reports immediately because of lacking of awareness of rush publication,so resulted in the other two experiment groups catching up. There is a criterion that the first published scientific discovery has the priority right,according to this criterion,Wu Chien-Shiung lost the priority of exclusive experiments,which lost the opportunity to share this award of the Nobel prize in physics. From the Nobel prize case we can draw a conclusion that researchers should with the scientific awareness of rush publication in the fierce global scientific arena.
引文
[1]梁国钊.梁国钊集[C].北京:线装书局,2012.
[2]江才健.物理科学的第一夫人吴健雄[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1997.
[3]季承.诺贝尔奖中华风云李政道传[M].北京:国际文化出版公司,2010.
[4][美]哈里特·朱克曼.科学界的精英——美国的诺贝尔奖金获得者[M].周叶谦,冯世刚,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[5]李政道.李政道文录[C].杭州:浙江文艺出版社,1999.
[6][英]W.I.B.贝弗里奇.科学研究的艺术[M].陈捷,译.北京:科学出版社,1979.
[7][匈]伊什特万·豪尔吉陶伊.通往斯德哥尔摩之路:诺贝尔奖、科学和科学家[M].节艳丽,译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2007.
[8]蔡华文,等.诺贝尔奖金获得者传:第4卷[C].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1987.
[9]毛泽东.毛泽东诗词大典[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,1993.