基于城乡统筹发展的农村土地综合整治绩效研究——以重庆市典型项目区为例
|
摘要
研究目的:从促进城乡土地要素优化配置、农村公共服务水平提升和农民增收三个方面,构建农村土地综合整治促进城乡统筹发展的绩效评价指标体系,对农村土地综合整治的绩效进行评价,以期更好地发挥土地整治促进城乡统筹发展的功能。研究方法:熵权灰靶模型。研究结果:(1)各项目区综合绩效存在一定差异,综合靶心度在0.446—0.758之间,从大到小可排序为:M3>M1>M6>M5>M7>M4>M2。(2)各单项绩效的靶心度分别在0.150—0.246、0.172—0.346和0.108—0.194之间。研究结论:城乡统筹发展背景下,要求农村土地整治促进城乡土地要素、公共服务、居民收入三方面的统筹;土地集约利用水平是影响土地综合整治促进城乡土地要素空间优化配置绩效的主要因素,农村居民点基础设施现状是影响土地综合整治促进农村公共服务水平提升绩效的主要因素,土地综合整治促进农民增收的绩效区域间差别不明显;城乡土地要素流动需通过土地整治进一步完善。
The purpose of this paper is to assess the performance of rural land comprehensive consolidation on urbanrural integrated development by establishing the evaluation index system from three aspects:spatial optimum allocation of rural and urban land resource, promotion of rural public service level and increasing of farmers' income, so that land consolidation can play a better role to promote urban-rural integrated development. Method employed is entropyweighted gray target model. The results indicated that 1)there is a significant difference among the performance of land comprehensive consolidation on urban-rural integrated development in these projects. The comprehensive approaching degree is between 0.446—0.758 and the seven projects can be sorted as:M4>M6>M3>M7>M5>M1>M2. 2)the approaching degrees of three aspects are between 0.150—0.246、0.172—0.346 and 0.108-0.194, respectively. It is concluded that in the context of urban-rural integrated development, land resource, public service and people's income of both urban and rural areas must be planned as a whole through land consolidation projects. Land intensive use level is the main factor that influences the performance of land comprehensive consolidation on spatial optimum allocation of rural and urban land resource. The infrastructure condition of the settlements is the main factor that influences the performance of land comprehensive consolidation on the promotion of rural public service level. The difference between the performances of land comprehensive consolidation on increasing farmers' income is not obvious. Land factor flowing between urban and rural areas should have further improved by rural land comprehensive consolidation.
The purpose of this paper is to assess the performance of rural land comprehensive consolidation on urbanrural integrated development by establishing the evaluation index system from three aspects:spatial optimum allocation of rural and urban land resource, promotion of rural public service level and increasing of farmers' income, so that land consolidation can play a better role to promote urban-rural integrated development. Method employed is entropyweighted gray target model. The results indicated that 1)there is a significant difference among the performance of land comprehensive consolidation on urban-rural integrated development in these projects. The comprehensive approaching degree is between 0.446—0.758 and the seven projects can be sorted as:M4>M6>M3>M7>M5>M1>M2. 2)the approaching degrees of three aspects are between 0.150—0.246、0.172—0.346 and 0.108-0.194, respectively. It is concluded that in the context of urban-rural integrated development, land resource, public service and people's income of both urban and rural areas must be planned as a whole through land consolidation projects. Land intensive use level is the main factor that influences the performance of land comprehensive consolidation on spatial optimum allocation of rural and urban land resource. The infrastructure condition of the settlements is the main factor that influences the performance of land comprehensive consolidation on the promotion of rural public service level. The difference between the performances of land comprehensive consolidation on increasing farmers' income is not obvious. Land factor flowing between urban and rural areas should have further improved by rural land comprehensive consolidation.
引文
[1]吴丽娟,刘玉亭,程慧.城乡统筹发展的动力机制和关键内容研究述评[J].经济地理,2012,32(4):113-118.
[2]刘彦随,朱琳,李玉恒.转型期农村土地整治的基础理论与模式探析[J].地理科学进展,2012,3 1(6):777-782.
[3]龙花楼.论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J].地理学报,2013,68(8):1019-1028.
[4]金晓斌,黄玮,易理强,等.土地整理项目绩效评价初探[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(6):57-62.
[5]罗文斌,吴次芳.农村土地整理项目绩效评价及影响因素定量分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(22):273-281.
[6]赵小风,黄贤金,王小丽,等.基于城乡统筹的农村土地综合整治研究——以南京市靖安街道“万顷良田建设”为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(2):158-163.
[7]陈秧分,刘彦随.农村土地整治的观点辨析与路径选择[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(8):93-96.
[8]尹建国,刘文玲.宁夏上一轮土地整治规划实施效果评价[J].宁夏农林科技,2014,55(11):66-67.
[9]王孟.吉林省土地整治规划效益研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2013:60.
[10]黄天能.土地整治规划实施综合效益评价[D].南宁:广西师范学院,2014:76.
[11]黄辉玲,吴次芳,张守忠.黑龙江省土地整治规划效益分析与评价[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):240-246.
[12]倪楠,郭韬.基于超效率DEA模型的土地整治项目绩效评价——以安徽省为例[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(29):142-148.
[13]王喜,陈常优,谢申申.基于行为与结果的土地整治项目绩效评价研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2014,30(6):88-93.
[14]薛思学,张克新,黄辉玲,等.土地整治项目绩效评价研究——以黑龙江省为例[J].国土与自然资源研究,2012,(1):28-30.
[15]杜鑫昱,夏建国,章大容.四川省土地整理项目绩效评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(4):514-524.
[16]张欣,杨俊,王占岐.基于全过程的土地整治项目绩效评价[J].湖北农业科学,2015,54(9):2073-2079.
[17]林艳丽,闫弘文.农村土地综合整治效益评价指标体系探究[J].鲁东大学学报(自然科学版),2011,27(2):164-167.
[18]雷亚芹.农村土地综合整治效益评估研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2012:41.
[19]张玉婷.和林格尔县土地整治模式及其综合效益评价研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2013:64.
[20]张正峰.湖北省天门市土地整治效应评估研究[J].地域研究与开发,2013,(1):123-127.
[21]杨庆媛,张占录,杨华均.土地开发整理项目社会影响评价方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(3):44-49.
[22]张庶,金晓斌,魏东岳,等.土地整治项目绩效评价指标设置和测度方法研究综述[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(7):90-96.
[23]郭贯成.土地整治推进城乡统筹的国内外探索[J].中国土地,2015,(7):24-25.
[24]李晨,吴克宁,刘新卫.土地整治促进城乡统筹[J].中国土地,2013,(4):45-46.
[25]鲁成树,孙旭海.城乡统筹背景下土地整治模式与政策选择研究[J].湖南农业科学,2014,(1):88-90.
[26]李红波,张小林.城乡统筹背景的空间发展:村落衰退与重构[J].改革,2012,(1):148-153.
[27]张正峰,杨红,刘静,等.城市边缘区城乡统筹的一体化土地整治策略[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(7):45-49.
[28]李冰清,王占岐,金贵.新农村建设背景下的土地整治项目绩效评价[J].中国土地科学,20 15,29(3):68-74,96.
[29]Koh Chul-Hwan.The Korean tidal flat s ystems:Toward transformation from land reclamation to wetland protection[J].Ocean&Coastal Management,2014,(102):393-397.
[30]Kupidura Adrianna,Luczewski Michal,Home Robert,et al.Public perceptions of rural landscapes in land consolidation procedures in Poland[J].Land Use Policy,2014,(39):313-319.
[31]Zeballos Carlos,Yamaguchi Keita.Impacts of land reclamation on the landscape of Lake Biwa,Japan[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2011,(19):683-692.
[32]Rafael Crecente.Economic,social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia[J].Land Use Policy,2002,(19):135-147.
[33]Sklenicka Petr.Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic[J].Land Use Policy,2006,23(4):502-510.
[34]冯应斌,杨庆媛,张丽.西南丘陵区土地整理项目绩效评价指标体系研究[J].乡镇经济,2008,(10):38-41.
[35]展炜,何立恒,金晓斌,等.基于模糊综合评价的土地整理项目绩效评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,33(2):145-148.
[36]肖新平,毛树华.灰预测与决策方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[37]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2002.
[38]乔家君.改进的熵值法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用[J].资源科学,2004,26(1):113-119.
[2]刘彦随,朱琳,李玉恒.转型期农村土地整治的基础理论与模式探析[J].地理科学进展,2012,3 1(6):777-782.
[3]龙花楼.论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J].地理学报,2013,68(8):1019-1028.
[4]金晓斌,黄玮,易理强,等.土地整理项目绩效评价初探[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(6):57-62.
[5]罗文斌,吴次芳.农村土地整理项目绩效评价及影响因素定量分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(22):273-281.
[6]赵小风,黄贤金,王小丽,等.基于城乡统筹的农村土地综合整治研究——以南京市靖安街道“万顷良田建设”为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(2):158-163.
[7]陈秧分,刘彦随.农村土地整治的观点辨析与路径选择[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(8):93-96.
[8]尹建国,刘文玲.宁夏上一轮土地整治规划实施效果评价[J].宁夏农林科技,2014,55(11):66-67.
[9]王孟.吉林省土地整治规划效益研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2013:60.
[10]黄天能.土地整治规划实施综合效益评价[D].南宁:广西师范学院,2014:76.
[11]黄辉玲,吴次芳,张守忠.黑龙江省土地整治规划效益分析与评价[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):240-246.
[12]倪楠,郭韬.基于超效率DEA模型的土地整治项目绩效评价——以安徽省为例[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(29):142-148.
[13]王喜,陈常优,谢申申.基于行为与结果的土地整治项目绩效评价研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2014,30(6):88-93.
[14]薛思学,张克新,黄辉玲,等.土地整治项目绩效评价研究——以黑龙江省为例[J].国土与自然资源研究,2012,(1):28-30.
[15]杜鑫昱,夏建国,章大容.四川省土地整理项目绩效评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(4):514-524.
[16]张欣,杨俊,王占岐.基于全过程的土地整治项目绩效评价[J].湖北农业科学,2015,54(9):2073-2079.
[17]林艳丽,闫弘文.农村土地综合整治效益评价指标体系探究[J].鲁东大学学报(自然科学版),2011,27(2):164-167.
[18]雷亚芹.农村土地综合整治效益评估研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2012:41.
[19]张玉婷.和林格尔县土地整治模式及其综合效益评价研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2013:64.
[20]张正峰.湖北省天门市土地整治效应评估研究[J].地域研究与开发,2013,(1):123-127.
[21]杨庆媛,张占录,杨华均.土地开发整理项目社会影响评价方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(3):44-49.
[22]张庶,金晓斌,魏东岳,等.土地整治项目绩效评价指标设置和测度方法研究综述[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(7):90-96.
[23]郭贯成.土地整治推进城乡统筹的国内外探索[J].中国土地,2015,(7):24-25.
[24]李晨,吴克宁,刘新卫.土地整治促进城乡统筹[J].中国土地,2013,(4):45-46.
[25]鲁成树,孙旭海.城乡统筹背景下土地整治模式与政策选择研究[J].湖南农业科学,2014,(1):88-90.
[26]李红波,张小林.城乡统筹背景的空间发展:村落衰退与重构[J].改革,2012,(1):148-153.
[27]张正峰,杨红,刘静,等.城市边缘区城乡统筹的一体化土地整治策略[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(7):45-49.
[28]李冰清,王占岐,金贵.新农村建设背景下的土地整治项目绩效评价[J].中国土地科学,20 15,29(3):68-74,96.
[29]Koh Chul-Hwan.The Korean tidal flat s ystems:Toward transformation from land reclamation to wetland protection[J].Ocean&Coastal Management,2014,(102):393-397.
[30]Kupidura Adrianna,Luczewski Michal,Home Robert,et al.Public perceptions of rural landscapes in land consolidation procedures in Poland[J].Land Use Policy,2014,(39):313-319.
[31]Zeballos Carlos,Yamaguchi Keita.Impacts of land reclamation on the landscape of Lake Biwa,Japan[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2011,(19):683-692.
[32]Rafael Crecente.Economic,social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia[J].Land Use Policy,2002,(19):135-147.
[33]Sklenicka Petr.Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic[J].Land Use Policy,2006,23(4):502-510.
[34]冯应斌,杨庆媛,张丽.西南丘陵区土地整理项目绩效评价指标体系研究[J].乡镇经济,2008,(10):38-41.
[35]展炜,何立恒,金晓斌,等.基于模糊综合评价的土地整理项目绩效评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,33(2):145-148.
[36]肖新平,毛树华.灰预测与决策方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[37]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2002.
[38]乔家君.改进的熵值法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用[J].资源科学,2004,26(1):113-119.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |