辽宁省环境规制约束下的雾霾脱钩效应分析
|
摘要
基于2006年—2015年辽宁省57个地区的统计和卫星遥感数据,使用空间杜宾模型,检验政府和市场环境规制工具对邻近地区工业发展与雾霾脱钩的空间效应.空间自相关结果表明,辽宁各地雾霾脱钩呈现空间正相关特征,大部分地区处于绝对和相对脱钩状态.实证结果表明:由于资源税成本较低及地方政府对大企业环保责任的有效监督,辽宁省政府环境规制的雾霾脱钩效果优于市场型环境规制;示范效应和大气运动使得本地环境规制强度提高,这对邻近地区的雾霾脱钩带来了积极的引导和波及效应.
Based on the statistical and satellite remote sensing data of 57 regions in Liaoning Province from 2006 to 2015 a,the spatial Durbin model was used to test the spatial effect of government and market environment regulation tools on the decoupling of industrial development and haze in the neighboring regions. The results of spatial autocorrelation showed that haze decoupling in Liaoning Province presents a spatial positive correlation,and most of the regions are absolutely and relatively decoupled. The empirical results showthat due to the lowresource tax cost and effective supervision of local governments on the environmental responsibility of large enterprises, the government' s environmental regulation effect is better than the market environmental regulation; the demonstration effect and atmospheric movement have brought positive guidance and ripple effects to the neighboring regions.
Based on the statistical and satellite remote sensing data of 57 regions in Liaoning Province from 2006 to 2015 a,the spatial Durbin model was used to test the spatial effect of government and market environment regulation tools on the decoupling of industrial development and haze in the neighboring regions. The results of spatial autocorrelation showed that haze decoupling in Liaoning Province presents a spatial positive correlation,and most of the regions are absolutely and relatively decoupled. The empirical results showthat due to the lowresource tax cost and effective supervision of local governments on the environmental responsibility of large enterprises, the government' s environmental regulation effect is better than the market environmental regulation; the demonstration effect and atmospheric movement have brought positive guidance and ripple effects to the neighboring regions.
引文
[1]Ribeiro F M,Kruglianskas I.Principles of environmental regulatory quality:a synthesis from literature review[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,96(1):58-76.
[2]Porter M E.America's green strategy[J].Scientific American,199l,264(4):193-246.
[3]Lanoie P,Lucchetti J L,Johnstone N,et al.Environmental policy,innovation and performance:new insights on the Porter hypothesis[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2011,20(3):803-842.
[4]Wang Z H,Zhang B,Zeng H L.The effect of environmental regulation on external trade:empirical evidences from Chinese economy[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,1114(2):55-61.
[5]Randy B A.Local environmental regulation and plant-level productivity[J].Ecological Economics,2011,70(11):2516-2522.
[6]Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Sustainable development(OECD)indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth[R].Paris:OECD,2002.
[7]魏巍贤,马喜立.能源结构调整与雾霾治理的最优政策选择[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(7):6-14.(Wei Wei-xian,Ma Xi-li.Optimal policy for energy structure adjustment and haze governance in China[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2015,25(7):6-14.)
[8]Donkelaar A V,Martin R V,Brauer M,et al.Use of satellite observations for long-term exposure assessment of global concentrations of fine particulate matter[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,2015,23(2):135-143.
[9]徐康宁,陈丰龙,刘修岩.中国经济增长的真实性:基于全球夜间打光数据的检验[J].经济研究,2015(9):17-57.(Xu Kang-ning,Chen Feng-long,Liu Xiu-yan.The truth of China economic growth:evidence from global night-time light data[J].Economic Research Journal,2015(9):17-57.)
[2]Porter M E.America's green strategy[J].Scientific American,199l,264(4):193-246.
[3]Lanoie P,Lucchetti J L,Johnstone N,et al.Environmental policy,innovation and performance:new insights on the Porter hypothesis[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2011,20(3):803-842.
[4]Wang Z H,Zhang B,Zeng H L.The effect of environmental regulation on external trade:empirical evidences from Chinese economy[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,1114(2):55-61.
[5]Randy B A.Local environmental regulation and plant-level productivity[J].Ecological Economics,2011,70(11):2516-2522.
[6]Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Sustainable development(OECD)indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth[R].Paris:OECD,2002.
[7]魏巍贤,马喜立.能源结构调整与雾霾治理的最优政策选择[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(7):6-14.(Wei Wei-xian,Ma Xi-li.Optimal policy for energy structure adjustment and haze governance in China[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2015,25(7):6-14.)
[8]Donkelaar A V,Martin R V,Brauer M,et al.Use of satellite observations for long-term exposure assessment of global concentrations of fine particulate matter[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,2015,23(2):135-143.
[9]徐康宁,陈丰龙,刘修岩.中国经济增长的真实性:基于全球夜间打光数据的检验[J].经济研究,2015(9):17-57.(Xu Kang-ning,Chen Feng-long,Liu Xiu-yan.The truth of China economic growth:evidence from global night-time light data[J].Economic Research Journal,2015(9):17-57.)