基于Cite Space V的全球碳税研究进展可视化分析
|
摘要
为总结全球碳税的研究现状并预测其未来发展趋势,借助Cite Space V软件,对1990—2019年期间Web of Science收录的碳税领域的相关文献进行可视化知识图谱分析。通过对该领域主要作者、研究机构及国家等方面进行可视化分析,描述该领域的主要研究力量及研究人员的分布;通过对关键词、研究聚类等进行知识图谱可视化分析,描述该领域的研究热点及未来发展趋势。结果表明:该领域的作者间合作以小范围团队合作为主,研究主要集中于美国、中国、加拿大等国家,且主要研究机构大多为各国高校;研究主要集中于碳泄露、碳成本、气候变化以及相关政策研究等方面;替代能源、清洁能源是该领域未来研究发展趋势之一。
In order to summarize the research status of the global carbon tax and predict its future development trend,the Cite Space V software is used to visualize the knowledge of the relevant literature in the field of carbon tax collected by Web of Science from 1990 to 2019. Through the visual analysis of the main authors, research institutions and countries in the field, the main research forces and the distribution of researchers in this field were described. Through visual analysis of knowledge atlas such as keywords,research clustering,etc. the research hotspots and future development trends in this field were described. The results showed that the cooperation among authors in this field was mainly based on small-scale teamwork. The research was mainly concentrated in the United States,China,Canada and other countries,and the main research institutions were mostly universities in various countries. The research mainly focuses on carbon leakage,carbon cost and climate change and related policy research; alternative energy and clean energy are one of the future research trends in this field.
In order to summarize the research status of the global carbon tax and predict its future development trend,the Cite Space V software is used to visualize the knowledge of the relevant literature in the field of carbon tax collected by Web of Science from 1990 to 2019. Through the visual analysis of the main authors, research institutions and countries in the field, the main research forces and the distribution of researchers in this field were described. Through visual analysis of knowledge atlas such as keywords,research clustering,etc. the research hotspots and future development trends in this field were described. The results showed that the cooperation among authors in this field was mainly based on small-scale teamwork. The research was mainly concentrated in the United States,China,Canada and other countries,and the main research institutions were mostly universities in various countries. The research mainly focuses on carbon leakage,carbon cost and climate change and related policy research; alternative energy and clean energy are one of the future research trends in this field.
引文
[1]PETERS G P,HERTWICH E G.CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy[J].Environmental science&technology,2008,42(5):1401-1407.
[2]Davis S J,Caldeira K.Consumption-based accounting of CO2emissions[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2010,107(12):5687-5692.
[3]Kuik O,Hofkes M.Border adjustment for European emissions trading:Competitiveness and carbon leakage[J].Energy policy,2010,38(4):1741-1748.
[4]Fischer C,Fox A K.Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage:Border carbon adjustments versus rebates[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2012,64(2):199-216.
[5]Acemoglu D,Aghion P,Bursztyn L,et al.The environment and directed technical change[J].American economic review,2012,102(1):131-166.
[6]Golosov M,Hassler J,Krusell P,et al.Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium[J].Econometrica,2014,82(1):41-88.
[7]Sinn H W.Public policies against global warming:a supply side approach[J].International Tax and Public Finance,2008,15(4):360-394.
[8]Meinshausen M,Meinshausen N,Hare W,et al.Greenhousegas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C[J].Nature,2009,458(7242):1158.
[9]Rausch S,Metcalf G E,Reilly J M.Distributional impacts of carbon pricing:A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households[J].Energy Economics,2011,33:S20-S33.
[10]Dissou Y,Siddiqui M S.Can carbon taxes be progressive?[J].Energy Economics,2014,42:88-100.
[11]Wang X,Li J F,Zhang Y X.An analysis on the short-term sectoral competitiveness impact of carbon tax in China[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(7):4144-4152.
[12]Lu C,Tong Q,Liu X.The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(11):7278-7285.
[2]Davis S J,Caldeira K.Consumption-based accounting of CO2emissions[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2010,107(12):5687-5692.
[3]Kuik O,Hofkes M.Border adjustment for European emissions trading:Competitiveness and carbon leakage[J].Energy policy,2010,38(4):1741-1748.
[4]Fischer C,Fox A K.Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage:Border carbon adjustments versus rebates[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2012,64(2):199-216.
[5]Acemoglu D,Aghion P,Bursztyn L,et al.The environment and directed technical change[J].American economic review,2012,102(1):131-166.
[6]Golosov M,Hassler J,Krusell P,et al.Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium[J].Econometrica,2014,82(1):41-88.
[7]Sinn H W.Public policies against global warming:a supply side approach[J].International Tax and Public Finance,2008,15(4):360-394.
[8]Meinshausen M,Meinshausen N,Hare W,et al.Greenhousegas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C[J].Nature,2009,458(7242):1158.
[9]Rausch S,Metcalf G E,Reilly J M.Distributional impacts of carbon pricing:A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households[J].Energy Economics,2011,33:S20-S33.
[10]Dissou Y,Siddiqui M S.Can carbon taxes be progressive?[J].Energy Economics,2014,42:88-100.
[11]Wang X,Li J F,Zhang Y X.An analysis on the short-term sectoral competitiveness impact of carbon tax in China[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(7):4144-4152.
[12]Lu C,Tong Q,Liu X.The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(11):7278-7285.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |