摘要
为了解甜高粱种质资源的多样性,充分挖掘利用其有益基因,提高甜高粱育种效率。本试验对15份甜高粱种质资源的7个农艺性状进行遗传变异、相关性、主成分及聚类分析。结果表明:7个农艺性状中锤度变异系数最大,为31.22%;茎粗变异系数最小,为7.73%。相关性分析结果显示,株高与茎粗呈极显著负相关,与穗粒重、千粒重呈弱负相关;锤度与其他6个性状相关性较弱。主成分分析结果表明,株型因子、籽粒产量因子、锤度因子累计贡献率达83.115%,可基本反映7个农艺性状的遗传信息。通过聚类分析将15份甜高粱种质资源分为4大类,各类群间农艺性状差异明显,其中第Ⅲ、第Ⅳ类群性状优良,可作为核心种质资源进一步挖掘利用。
To understand the diversity of germplasm, explore beneficial genes and improve breeding efficiency of sweet sorghum, we carried out the genetic variation, correlation, principal component and cluster analysis of 7 agronomic characters of 15 sweet sorghum germplasm resources. The results showed that: the variation coefficient of brix was the largest(31.22%) and that of stem diameter was the smallest(7.73%) among the 7 agronomic characters; the correlation analysis showed that plant height was significantly and negatively correlated with stem diameter, and was negatively correlated with 1000-grain weight and weight of grains per panicle; the correlation between brix and the other 6 characters was weak; the principal component analysis showed that the cumulative contribution rate of the plant type factor, the grain yield factor and the bix factor was 83.115%, reflecting the genetic information of the 7 agronomic characters; the 15 sweet sorghum germplasm resources could be divided into 4 types with cluster analysis, the difference of agronomic characters among the 4 types was obvious; the Ⅲ and Ⅳ type with superior characters could be further excavated and utilized as a core germplasm resource.
引文
[1]卢庆善.甜高粱[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008:83-101.
[2]王继师,刘祖昕,樊帆,等.24个甜高粱品种主要农艺性状与品质性状遗传多样性分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2012,17(6):83-91.
[3]王黎明,焦少杰,姜艳喜,等.不同来源甜高粱种质资源的表型遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(2):411-416.
[4]李春宏,陆相龙,张培通,等.防除甜高粱田杂草的除草剂筛选[J].作物杂志,2018(6):158-161.
[5]王海滨,贺晔,谢秋霖.山西省高粱产业发展思路与对策[J].中国农技推广,2018(10):17-19.
[6]赵香娜,李桂英,刘洋,等.国内外甜高粱种质资源主要性状遗传多样性及相关性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2008,9(3):302-307.
[7]闫峰.甜高粱种质资源评价及亲缘关系分析[D].黑龙江:中国农业科学院甜菜研究所,2008.
[8]Assar A H,Uptmoor R,Abdelmula A A,et al.Genetic variation in sorghum germplasm from Sudan,ICRISAT,and USA assessed by simple sequence repeats(SSRs)[J].CropSci,2005,45:1636-1644.
[9]Ali M L,Rajewski J F,Baenziger P S,et al.Assessment of genetic diversity and relationship among a collection of US sweet sorghum germplasm by SSR markers[J].Mol Breed,2008,21:497-509.
[10]赵香娜,岳美琪,刘洋,等.国内外甜高粱种质遗传多样性的SSR分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2010,11(4):407-412.
[11]卢庆善,邹剑秋,朱凯,等.高粱种质资源的多样性和利用[J].植物遗传资源学报,2010,11(6):798-801.
[12]卢庆善.高粱种质资源的多样性和评价[J].园艺与种苗,2011(4):1-5.
[13]郑殿升,杨庆文,刘旭.中国作物种质资源多样性[J].植物遗传资源学报,2011,12(4):497-500,506.
[14]赵香娜.国内外甜高粱品种资源遗传多样性研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,2008.
[15]邵初阳,何晓兰,徐照龙,等.甜高粱种质资源多样性及主要农艺参数聚类分析[J].江苏农业学报,2015,31(5):984-994.
[16]杨珍,李斌,赵军,等.甜高粱主要农艺性状与产量相关和通径分析[J].中国糖料,2018,40(4):16-19.
[17]卓越.玉米杂交组合主要性状与产量的相关和通径分析[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(7):55-57.
[18]赵威军,张福耀,常玉卉,等.甜高粱品系的抗倒伏性评价及相关分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2013,14(1):58-64.
[19]冯国郡.甜高粱种质资源的遗传多样性与高光效种质生理机制的研究[D].新疆:新疆农业大学,2013.
[20]刘洋,罗萍,林希昊,等.甜高粱主要农艺性状相关性及遗传多样性初析[J].热带作物学报,2011,32(6):1004-1008.
[21]薛云云,白冬梅,田跃霞,等.24份山西花生资源农艺性状的相关性和主成分分析[J].山西农业科学,2017,45(10):1587-1590,1630.
[22]王蕾,张想平,李润喜,等.大麦农艺性状和子粒支链淀粉的多元分析与评价[J].作物杂志,2018(5):71-76.
[23]王慧,杨媛,石金波,等.晋北地区引种苦荞麦的生态适应性与主成分分析[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(16):23-27.
[24]刘翔宇,刘祖昕,加帕尔,等.基于主成分与灰色关联分析的甜高粱品种综合评价[J].新疆农业科学,2016,53(1):99-107.
[25]李振武,支萍,孔令旗,等.甜高粱主要性状的遗传参数分析[J].作物学报,1992,18(3):213-221.
[26]张阳,赵威军,张福耀,等.新选甜高粱不育系和恢复系的配合力分析[J].作物杂志,2010(5):102-105.