果蔗品种的种植表现与综合评价
|
摘要
为筛选出适宜余杭地区气候、生态条件的果蔗良种,引进了潭州大白蔗、温联果蔗、温联2号、广东黄皮果蔗、温岭青皮果蔗5个品种,加上当地主栽品种临平紫皮果蔗和临平上河青(对照)共7个品种,从产量、口感、抗性等方面进行综合比较。结果表明,广东黄皮果蔗综合表现最好,可作为主栽品种推广;温联2号表现较优,可适度推广。临平上河青和临平紫皮果蔗虽然综合表现差,但品质表现最好,作为地方种质资源应加以保护利用。
The comparative test of five introduced chewing cane varieties(Dabaizhe, Wenlian, Wenlian2,Guangdong Huangpi and Wenling Qingpi) and two local main cultivars(Linping Zipi, Linping Shangheqing as control) for cane yield, taste, resistance were carried out so as to select suitable varieties for local climate and ecological conditions in Yuhang district. The results showed that Guangdong Huangpi performed comprehensively the best and could be popularized as the main cultivar, while Wenlian2 had much better comprehensive performance and could be moderately popularized. Although Linping Shangheqing and Linping Zipi had lower comprehensive performance, their quality performances were the best, which could be protected and utilized as local germplasm resources.
The comparative test of five introduced chewing cane varieties(Dabaizhe, Wenlian, Wenlian2,Guangdong Huangpi and Wenling Qingpi) and two local main cultivars(Linping Zipi, Linping Shangheqing as control) for cane yield, taste, resistance were carried out so as to select suitable varieties for local climate and ecological conditions in Yuhang district. The results showed that Guangdong Huangpi performed comprehensively the best and could be popularized as the main cultivar, while Wenlian2 had much better comprehensive performance and could be moderately popularized. Although Linping Shangheqing and Linping Zipi had lower comprehensive performance, their quality performances were the best, which could be protected and utilized as local germplasm resources.
引文
[1]李瑞美,何炎森.不同类型果蔗品种资源氨基酸等营养成分分析[J].热带作物学报,2017,38(1):171-174.
[2]肖祎,吕达,陈道德.我国果蔗研究新进展[J].中国糖料,2018,40(1):62-67.
[3]林一心,吴水金,张树河,等.中国果蔗科技发展的成就、问题及对策[J].中国农业信息,2009(3):16-20.
[4]李时珍.本草纲目[M].江苏:江苏人民出版社,2011.
[5]福建省工业原料作物学会.福建省果蔗学科发展研究报告[J].海峡科学,2013(1):49-54.
[6]程世华,等.余杭区农业志[Z].1988.
[7]NY/T2936-2016.甘蔗种质资源描述规范[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2016.
[8]潘世明,王子琳.果蔗4个性状对蔗茎产量的效应[J].甘蔗(福建),1997,4(3):13-15.
[9]易代勇,周正邦,朱文华,等.果蔗新品种(系)引种比较试验[J].贵州农业科学,2009,37(9):22-25.
[10]陈萍,曾美红.黑皮果蔗不同茎节性状与含糖量的相关性分析[J].广东农业科学,2010:(7):24-25.
[11]周忠凤,李涛.2008-2009年广西甘蔗新品种在柳州蔗区的种植表现[J].广西农业科学,2010,41(6):539-541.
[12]陈金斌,林警周,林炎照,等.6个果蔗品种在龙岩市新罗区的种植表现[J].亚热带农业研究,2013,9(1):12-14
[13]雷石富,雷朝云,谢惠珏,等.云南红皮果蔗区域适应性试验[J].热带农业科学,2013,33(7):27-29.
[14]刘建华,辛术贞,杨毅,等.四川环境因子对果蔗品质的影响及应对措施[J].中国糖料,2016,38(5):79-90.
[15]王文华,毛玲荣,莫冬生,等.温联2号果蔗的选育及栽培技术[J].浙江农业科学,2011(5):1024-1025.
[16]李海明,林一心,潘世明,等.广东黄皮果蔗特征特性及高产优质栽培技术[J].福建农业科技,2005(6):21-22.
[17]吴水金,林一心,潘世明,等.广东黄皮蔗引种对比试验初报[J].中国糖料,2008,30(4):29-30.
[18]何毅波,李松,刘俊仙,等.果蔗新品种桂果蔗1号高产栽培技术[J].中国糖料,2017,39(6):54-56.
[19]李松,刘欣,何毅波,等.桂果蔗1号脱毒健康组培苗繁种技术[J].中国种业,2017(7):74-76.
[20]王丽萍,邓泽周,田利华,等.果蔗脱毒种苗组培快繁技术研究[J].中国糖料,2014,36(1):10-12.
[21]王文华,毛玲荣,林燚,等.广东黄皮果蔗脱毒种茎苗对产量和效益的影响[J].甘蔗糖业,2017(1):6-8.
[2]肖祎,吕达,陈道德.我国果蔗研究新进展[J].中国糖料,2018,40(1):62-67.
[3]林一心,吴水金,张树河,等.中国果蔗科技发展的成就、问题及对策[J].中国农业信息,2009(3):16-20.
[4]李时珍.本草纲目[M].江苏:江苏人民出版社,2011.
[5]福建省工业原料作物学会.福建省果蔗学科发展研究报告[J].海峡科学,2013(1):49-54.
[6]程世华,等.余杭区农业志[Z].1988.
[7]NY/T2936-2016.甘蔗种质资源描述规范[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2016.
[8]潘世明,王子琳.果蔗4个性状对蔗茎产量的效应[J].甘蔗(福建),1997,4(3):13-15.
[9]易代勇,周正邦,朱文华,等.果蔗新品种(系)引种比较试验[J].贵州农业科学,2009,37(9):22-25.
[10]陈萍,曾美红.黑皮果蔗不同茎节性状与含糖量的相关性分析[J].广东农业科学,2010:(7):24-25.
[11]周忠凤,李涛.2008-2009年广西甘蔗新品种在柳州蔗区的种植表现[J].广西农业科学,2010,41(6):539-541.
[12]陈金斌,林警周,林炎照,等.6个果蔗品种在龙岩市新罗区的种植表现[J].亚热带农业研究,2013,9(1):12-14
[13]雷石富,雷朝云,谢惠珏,等.云南红皮果蔗区域适应性试验[J].热带农业科学,2013,33(7):27-29.
[14]刘建华,辛术贞,杨毅,等.四川环境因子对果蔗品质的影响及应对措施[J].中国糖料,2016,38(5):79-90.
[15]王文华,毛玲荣,莫冬生,等.温联2号果蔗的选育及栽培技术[J].浙江农业科学,2011(5):1024-1025.
[16]李海明,林一心,潘世明,等.广东黄皮果蔗特征特性及高产优质栽培技术[J].福建农业科技,2005(6):21-22.
[17]吴水金,林一心,潘世明,等.广东黄皮蔗引种对比试验初报[J].中国糖料,2008,30(4):29-30.
[18]何毅波,李松,刘俊仙,等.果蔗新品种桂果蔗1号高产栽培技术[J].中国糖料,2017,39(6):54-56.
[19]李松,刘欣,何毅波,等.桂果蔗1号脱毒健康组培苗繁种技术[J].中国种业,2017(7):74-76.
[20]王丽萍,邓泽周,田利华,等.果蔗脱毒种苗组培快繁技术研究[J].中国糖料,2014,36(1):10-12.
[21]王文华,毛玲荣,林燚,等.广东黄皮果蔗脱毒种茎苗对产量和效益的影响[J].甘蔗糖业,2017(1):6-8.