用户名: 密码: 验证码:
腐败行为模型研究及其未来展望
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Model of Corrupt Action and Its Prospects
  • 作者:文晓立
  • 英文作者:WEN Xiaoli;School of Transportation and Economic Management,Guangdong Communication Polytechnic;
  • 关键词:腐败行为模型 ; 腐败 ; 述评 ; 展望
  • 英文关键词:corruption behavior model;;corruption;;review and comment;;prospect
  • 中文刊名:LZWH
  • 英文刊名:Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
  • 机构:广东交通职业技术学院运输与经济管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-20
  • 出版单位:廉政文化研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.10;No.52
  • 基金:广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划课题(2016GZGJ02);; 广东省自筹经费类科技计划项目(2017ZC0357);; 教育部职业院校文化素质教育指导委员会教育科研课题(WH2017YB09);; 广东交通职业技术学院校级科研项目(YK18LD40219);广东交通职业技术学院校级教研项目(2017JG009)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:LZWH201902006
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:32-1817/D
  • 分类号:35-41
摘要
已有文献较少研究微观层面的个体腐败决策过程,即腐败行为模型研究。在梳理腐败行为模型理论背景和有关概念基础上,介绍了这一模型所构建的个体从事腐败行为前的四阶段决策过程理论框架,分析了模型中个体动机、意志、认知和情绪等多种成分对腐败的影响机制。总结该模型在个体、情境和组织等因素影响腐败的有关研究中的应用现状,结果表明,相对于宏观因素,个体因素对腐败意图和行为的影响可能更具有决定性。最后提出了腐败行为模型的研究展望:进一步完善理论框架,深入探讨模型中各有关变量的作用机制,对情境和组织层面的腐败影响因素进行整合。
        The decision-making procedure in individual corruption cases has been devoted relatively insufficient efforts in existing researches, i.e. research into the model of corruption behavior.Based on the combing of the background of model theory of corruption behavior, the paper is an introduction to the four-stage decision-making procedure of the model when the individual is involved in corruption, an analysis of the mechanism of how motivation, will, cognition, and emotion and other elements affect corruption.A summary of relative studies into how individual, environment and organization affect corruption in the model suggests that individual factors may be playing a more decisive role in corruption intension and behavior that factors on the macro level.There is a then into the future studies within the area of corruption model: further consummation of the theoretical framework, deepening the study of the function mechanism of relative variants, and the integration of affecting factors on the environment and organization level.
引文
[1]Dimant E,Schulte T.The nature of corruption:An interdisciplinary perspective[J].German Law Journal,2016,17(1):54-72.
    [2]Gorsira M,Denkers A,Huisman W.Both sides of the coin:Motives for corruption among public officials and business employees[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2018(151):179-194.
    [3]Collins J D,Uhlenbruck K,Rodriguez P.Why firms engage in corruption:A top management perspective[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2009,87(1):89-108.
    [4]Lambsdorff J G,Schulze G G.What can we know about corruption?A very short history of corruption research and a list of what we should aim for[J].Journal of Economics and Statistics,2015,235(2):100-114.
    [5]文晓立,陈春花.微观视角下领导者腐败影响因素研究综述[J].领导科学,2017(32):8-12.
    [6]Rabl T,Kühlmann T M.Understanding corruption in organizations-Development and empirical assessment of an action model[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2008,82(2):477-495.
    [7]Bagozzi R P,Dholakia U M,Basuroy S.How effortful decisions get enacted:The motivating role of decision processes,desires,and anticipated emotions.[J].Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2003,16(4):273-295.
    [8]Dholakia U M,Bagozzi R P.Mustering motivation to enact decisions:how decision process characteristics influence goal realization[J].Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2010,15(3):167-188.
    [9]Gollwitzer P M,Bargh J A(Eds.).The psychology of action:Linking cognition and motivation to behavior[C].New York:Guilford Press,1996:287-312.
    [10]Ajzen I.The theory of planned behavior[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991,50(2):179-211.
    [11]Bagozzi R P,Baumgartner H,Pieters R.Goal-directed emotions.[J].Cognition&Emotion,2010,1(1):1-26.
    [12]Heckhausen H,Gollwitzer P M.Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind[J].Motivation&Emotion,1987,11(2):101-120.
    [13]Gollwitzer,P M.Action phases and mind-sets[A].In Higgins E T,Sorrentio R M(Eds.).Handbook of motivation and cognition[C].Guilford Press,1990.
    [14]Nordin R M,Takim R,Nawawi A H.Behavioural factors of corruption in the construction industry[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(105):64-74.
    [15]Brown J,Loosemore M.Behavioural factors influencing corrupt action in the Australian construction industry[J].Engineering,Construction and Architectural Management,2015,22(4):372-389.
    [16]Pecujlija M,Cosic I,Nesicgrubic L,et al.Corruption:Engineers are Victims,Perpetrators or Both?[J].Science&Engineering Ethics,2014,21(4):1-17.
    [17]Alvarez J P.Low-level corruption tolerance:An“action-based”approach for Peru and Latin America[J].Journal of Politics in Latin America,2015,7(2):99-129.
    [18]Rabl T.The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2011,100(1):85-101.
    [19]Rabl T,Kühlmann T M.Why or why not?Rationalizing corruption in organizations[J].Applied Optics,2009,16(27):268-286.
    [20]Ashforth B E,Anand V.The normalization of corruption in organizations[J].Research in Organizational Behavior,2003,25(19):1-52.
    [21]Rabl T.Do contextual factors matter?[J].Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaft,2012,82(6):5-32.
    [22]Zhao H H,Zhang H Y,Xu Y.How social face consciousness influences corrupt intention:Examining the effects of Honesty-Humility and moral disengagement[J].The Journal of Social Psychology,2018:1-16.
    [23]Morris S A,Mcdonald R A.The role of moral intensity in moral judgments:An empirical investigation[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1995,14(9):715-726.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700