经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术在急性非结石性胆囊炎治疗中的价值

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The value of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in the treatment of acute non-stony cholecystitis 作者：陈毅 ; 崔存玮 ; 冯对平 ; 杨敏玲 ; 庞宁东 ; 李雷 英文作者：Chen Yi;Cui Cunwei;Feng Duiping;Yang Minling;Pang Ningdong;Li Lei;Department of Interventional, the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University; 关键词：急性胆囊炎 ; 无结石性胆囊炎 ; 胆囊切除术 ; 胆囊穿刺引流术 英文关键词：Acute cholecystitis;;Acalculous cholecystitis;;Cholecystectomy;;Gallbladder puncture and drainage 中文刊名：ZHJR 英文刊名：Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition) 机构：山西医科大学第一医院介入科; 出版日期：2019-05-23 10:51 出版单位：中华介入放射学电子杂志 年：2019 期：v.7 语种：中文; 页：ZHJR201902013 页数：4 CN：02 ISSN：11-9339/R 分类号：58-61

摘要

目的:比较单纯经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术和经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术联合胆囊切除术两种方法治疗急性非结石性胆囊炎的临床疗效。方法:选取2015年1月至2018年1月山西医科大学第一医院收治的31例急性非结石性胆囊炎患者,分为2组,A组14例,行单纯胆囊穿刺引流术,2～4周后拔除引流管;B组17例,行胆囊穿刺引流术后2～4周行胆囊切除术。比较两组患者的成功率、住院时间、复发率以及并发症发生率。结果:31例患者均一次性穿刺成功,患者的感染及腹痛症状在10 h后明显减轻。B组的住院时间比A组长[(13±4)d vs.(5±2)d],差异有统计学意义(t=3.250,P<0.05)。A组有1例在拔除引流管后4周再次高热,轻度腹痛,考虑胆囊炎复发,但是症状较轻,给予抗感染治疗后治愈。B组术后1例出现下肢静脉血栓,1例出现切口感染,1例出现肺部感染,两组的复发率和并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。结论:对于不伴有胆囊或者胆管结石的急性胆囊炎患者,单纯的经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流和经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流联合胆囊切除术都是有效安全的治疗方法,但是单纯经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术的住院时间较短。
        Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of simple percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with cholecystectomy on acute non-stone cholecystitis. Methods: Thirty-one patients were selected, examined by ultrasound and CT before surgery and then divided into 2 groups. The patients in group A(14 cases) underwent gallbladder puncture and drainage first, and after 2-4 weeks drainage tube was extracted; 17 patients in group B underwent gallbladder puncture and drainage first, and underwent cholecystectomy after 2-4 weeks. The success rate,length of hospitalization, relapse rate and complication rate of the two groups were compared. Results: All patients were successfully punctured once, and the symptoms of infection and abdominal pain were significantly reduced after 10 h. The hospitalization time of groups A and B was(5±2) d and(13±4) d, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), the relapse rates of two groups were 7.1% in group A and 0% in group B(P>0.05), the difference was not statistically significant, the complication rates in two groups were 0% in group A and 17.6% in group B(P>0.05), without statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Simple percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with cholecystectomy are effective and safe methods for patients with acute cholecystitis without gallbladder or bile duct stones, and the length of hospitalization of patients under simple percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage is shorter.

引文

[1]余伟平,闵志均,张箭平,等.经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术治疗高危急性胆囊炎[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2014,3(20):223-224.
    [2]谷涛,邓晓涛,于经瀛.经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术治疗高龄老年人急性非结石性胆囊炎的应用价值[J].中华老年医学杂志,2016,6(35):640-641.
    [3]张春礼,解寒冰,李影.经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术在妊娠中晚期急性胆囊炎并胆囊颈部结石嵌顿治疗中的应用[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2011,9(17):785-786.
    [4]郭欢庆,李威,邹常咏,等.经皮穿刺胆囊引流治疗急性重症胆囊炎的临床疗效[J].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2016,4(3):162-165.
    [4]Nikfarjam M,Shen L,Fink MA,et al.Percutaneous cholecystostomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis in the era of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2013,23(5):474-480.
    [5]王涛,陈琪,邹树,等.超声引导下胆囊穿刺置管联合胆道镜取石治疗胆囊结石[J].中华普通外科杂志,2014,4(29):310-311.
    [6]郭欢庆,李威,邹常咏,等.经皮穿刺胆囊引流治疗急性重症胆囊炎的临床疗效[J].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2016,4(3):162-165.
    [7]贾宝兴,金哲,付裕,等.胆囊穿刺引流结合不同时项腹腔镜胆囊切除治疗急性危重胆囊炎[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2015,7(21):490-491.
    [8]柯昌伟,吴硕东.经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术的临床应用[J].中华普通外科杂志,2017,5(32):463-464.