产业集群环境下网络权力对技术标准扩散的影响——知识转移与技术创新的链式中介作用
|
摘要
产业集群为技术标准扩散提供了平台,拥有更高网络权力的企业,其技术标准扩散能力更强,但网络权力影响技术标准扩散的路径并不清晰。基于产业集群环境,分析了网络权力对技术标准扩散的影响,并探究了知识转移与技术创新的链式中介作用。分析了283家制造业集群内企业调研数据,利用链式中介作用检验方法实证研究发现:一方面,网络权力显著直接正向影响技术标准扩散;另一方面,知识转移和技术创新不但分别中介网络权力对技术标准扩散的正向积极影响,并且起到链式中介作用。基于研究结论,提出了促进产业集群环境下技术标准扩散的实践建议。
The industry cluster provides the platform for technical standards diffusion, and firms with higher network power have stronger capacity on technical standards diffusion. However, the influencing path of network power on the technical standards diffusion is not clear. Based on industrial cluster environment, the influence of network power on technical standards diffusion is analyzed. Furthermore, the chain mediating role of knowledge transfer and technological innovation is explored. Using the test method of chain mediating role, the empirical research is carried out based on 283 enterprises in the manufacturing industry cluster. The research conclusions are as follows. On the one hand, network power has a significant direct impact on technical standards diffusion. On the other hand, knowledge transfer and technological innovation not only play a mediating role respectively in the positive influence of network power on technical standards diffusion, but also play a chain mediating role. According to the research findings, practice suggestions to promote technical standards diffusion in industrial cluster environment are proposed.
The industry cluster provides the platform for technical standards diffusion, and firms with higher network power have stronger capacity on technical standards diffusion. However, the influencing path of network power on the technical standards diffusion is not clear. Based on industrial cluster environment, the influence of network power on technical standards diffusion is analyzed. Furthermore, the chain mediating role of knowledge transfer and technological innovation is explored. Using the test method of chain mediating role, the empirical research is carried out based on 283 enterprises in the manufacturing industry cluster. The research conclusions are as follows. On the one hand, network power has a significant direct impact on technical standards diffusion. On the other hand, knowledge transfer and technological innovation not only play a mediating role respectively in the positive influence of network power on technical standards diffusion, but also play a chain mediating role. According to the research findings, practice suggestions to promote technical standards diffusion in industrial cluster environment are proposed.
引文
[1] 曾德明,吴传荣.高技术企业集群与技术标准合作的关系分析[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(14):72-75.
[2] 魏江,叶波.企业集群的创新集成:集群学习与挤压效应[J].中国软科学,2002(12):38-42.
[3] 孙耀吾,曾德明.技术标准合作:高技术企业集群创新研究的新视角[J].财经理论与实践,2005,26(6):89-93.
[4] 李庆满,杨皎平.集群视角下中小企业技术标准联盟的构建与治理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(23):80-84.
[5] 李大庆,李庆满.产业集群条件下技术标准联盟信任机制研究[J].标准科学,2013(4):41-44.
[6] 李庆满,吴旋,金彦龙.产业集群环境下企业技术标准联盟利益分配机制分析[J].商业经济研究,2016(11):107-108.
[7] 魏江,徐蕾.知识网络双重嵌入、知识整合与集群企业创新能力[J].管理科学学报,2014,17(2):34-47.
[8] GULATI R,SYTCH M.Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships:effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,521(1):32-69.
[9] IRELAND R D,WEBB J W.A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains[J].Journal of Operations Management,2007,25(2):482-497.
[10] 张巍,党兴华.企业网络权力与网络能力关联性研究——基于技术创新网络的分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(7):1094-1101.
[11] 韩莹,陈国宏.集群企业网络权力与创新绩效关系研究——基于双元式知识共享行为的中介作用[J].管理学报,2016,13(6):855-862.
[12] 戴万亮,李庆满.产业集群环境下市场导向对技术标准扩散的影响——有调节的中介效应[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(23):51-56.
[13] 许慧敏,辛冲,周宇姼.组织间关系网络对二元创新的影响:基于利用式学习的中介作用[J].技术经济,2016,35(5):69-75.
[14] 李薇,邱有梅.纵向伙伴关系维度的技术标准扩散效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(17):20-26.
[15] 鲜于波,梅琳.适应性预期、复杂网络与标准扩散动力学——基于计算经济学的研究[J].管理科学,2007,20(4):62-71.
[16] 曾德明,孙耀吾.基于集群的高技术企业技术标准战略及其发展研究[J].湖南社会科学,2005(2):80-83.
[17] 高映红,刘国新.网络权力与创新网络的治理[J].科技管理研究,2011,31(1):194-196.
[18] GILBERT B A,MCDOUGALL P P,AUDRETSCH D B.Clusters,knowledge spillovers and new venture performance:an empirical examination[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2008,23(4):405-422.
[19] COLOMBO M G,PIVA E,ROSSI-LAMASTRA C.Authorising employees to collaborate with communities during working hours:when is it valuable for firms[J].Long Range Planning,2013,46(3):236-257.
[20] 王建刚,吴洁.网络结构与企业竞争优势——基于知识转移能力的调节效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(5):55-66.
[21] 吴福象,蒋天颖,孙伟.网络位置、知识转移对集群企业竞争优势的影响——一项基于对温州乐清低压电器产业集群的实证研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(12):48-57.
[22] DYER J H,NOBEOKA K.Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:the Toyota case[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):345-367.
[23] DOVING E,GOODERHAM P N.Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversi?cation:the case of small firm accountancy practices[J].Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(8):841-857.
[24] 包凤耐,彭正银.网络能力视角下企业关系资本对知识转移的影响研究[J].南开管理评论,2015,18(3):95-101.
[25] KIM C S,INKPEN A C.Cross-border R&D alliances,absorptive capacity and technology learning[J].Journal of International Management,2005,11(3):313-329.
[26] WILLIAMS C.Transfer in context:replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(9):867-889.
[27] LEIPONEN A.Control of intellectual assets in client relationships:implications for innovation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(13):1371-1394.
[28] 钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010(5):118-129.
[29] 谢永平,韦联达,邵理辰.核心企业网络权力对创新网络成员行为影响[J].工业工程与管理,2014,19(3):72-78.
[30] 马蓝,安立仁.合作经验、吸收能力、网络权力对企业创新绩效的影响机制——基于组织学习视角[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(1):81-87.
[31] 程军.技术标准、专利与技术创新的联动模式研究[J].质量技术监督研究,2010(4):14-18.
[32] 王道平,方放,曾德明.产业技术标准与企业技术创新关系研究评述[J].经济学动态,2007(12):105-109.
[33] LEIPONEN A.Organization of knowledge and innovation:the case of Finnish business services[J].Industry and Innovation,2005,12(2):185-203.
[34] 余光胜,刘卫,唐郁.知识属性、情境依赖与默会知识共享条件研究[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(6):23-29.
[35] ZHAO X,LYNCH J G,CHEN Q.Reconsidering baron and kenny:myths and truths about mediation analysis[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2010,37(2):197-206.
[36] 陈瑞,郑毓煌,刘文静.中介效应分析:原理、程序、Bootstrap方法及其应用[J].营销科学学报,2013,9(4):120-135.
[37] 周永红,刘开军,蔡艳芳.产业集群生态化运作模式对企业成长的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(8):66-71.
[2] 魏江,叶波.企业集群的创新集成:集群学习与挤压效应[J].中国软科学,2002(12):38-42.
[3] 孙耀吾,曾德明.技术标准合作:高技术企业集群创新研究的新视角[J].财经理论与实践,2005,26(6):89-93.
[4] 李庆满,杨皎平.集群视角下中小企业技术标准联盟的构建与治理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(23):80-84.
[5] 李大庆,李庆满.产业集群条件下技术标准联盟信任机制研究[J].标准科学,2013(4):41-44.
[6] 李庆满,吴旋,金彦龙.产业集群环境下企业技术标准联盟利益分配机制分析[J].商业经济研究,2016(11):107-108.
[7] 魏江,徐蕾.知识网络双重嵌入、知识整合与集群企业创新能力[J].管理科学学报,2014,17(2):34-47.
[8] GULATI R,SYTCH M.Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships:effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,521(1):32-69.
[9] IRELAND R D,WEBB J W.A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains[J].Journal of Operations Management,2007,25(2):482-497.
[10] 张巍,党兴华.企业网络权力与网络能力关联性研究——基于技术创新网络的分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(7):1094-1101.
[11] 韩莹,陈国宏.集群企业网络权力与创新绩效关系研究——基于双元式知识共享行为的中介作用[J].管理学报,2016,13(6):855-862.
[12] 戴万亮,李庆满.产业集群环境下市场导向对技术标准扩散的影响——有调节的中介效应[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(23):51-56.
[13] 许慧敏,辛冲,周宇姼.组织间关系网络对二元创新的影响:基于利用式学习的中介作用[J].技术经济,2016,35(5):69-75.
[14] 李薇,邱有梅.纵向伙伴关系维度的技术标准扩散效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(17):20-26.
[15] 鲜于波,梅琳.适应性预期、复杂网络与标准扩散动力学——基于计算经济学的研究[J].管理科学,2007,20(4):62-71.
[16] 曾德明,孙耀吾.基于集群的高技术企业技术标准战略及其发展研究[J].湖南社会科学,2005(2):80-83.
[17] 高映红,刘国新.网络权力与创新网络的治理[J].科技管理研究,2011,31(1):194-196.
[18] GILBERT B A,MCDOUGALL P P,AUDRETSCH D B.Clusters,knowledge spillovers and new venture performance:an empirical examination[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2008,23(4):405-422.
[19] COLOMBO M G,PIVA E,ROSSI-LAMASTRA C.Authorising employees to collaborate with communities during working hours:when is it valuable for firms[J].Long Range Planning,2013,46(3):236-257.
[20] 王建刚,吴洁.网络结构与企业竞争优势——基于知识转移能力的调节效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(5):55-66.
[21] 吴福象,蒋天颖,孙伟.网络位置、知识转移对集群企业竞争优势的影响——一项基于对温州乐清低压电器产业集群的实证研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(12):48-57.
[22] DYER J H,NOBEOKA K.Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network:the Toyota case[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):345-367.
[23] DOVING E,GOODERHAM P N.Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversi?cation:the case of small firm accountancy practices[J].Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(8):841-857.
[24] 包凤耐,彭正银.网络能力视角下企业关系资本对知识转移的影响研究[J].南开管理评论,2015,18(3):95-101.
[25] KIM C S,INKPEN A C.Cross-border R&D alliances,absorptive capacity and technology learning[J].Journal of International Management,2005,11(3):313-329.
[26] WILLIAMS C.Transfer in context:replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(9):867-889.
[27] LEIPONEN A.Control of intellectual assets in client relationships:implications for innovation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(13):1371-1394.
[28] 钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010(5):118-129.
[29] 谢永平,韦联达,邵理辰.核心企业网络权力对创新网络成员行为影响[J].工业工程与管理,2014,19(3):72-78.
[30] 马蓝,安立仁.合作经验、吸收能力、网络权力对企业创新绩效的影响机制——基于组织学习视角[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(1):81-87.
[31] 程军.技术标准、专利与技术创新的联动模式研究[J].质量技术监督研究,2010(4):14-18.
[32] 王道平,方放,曾德明.产业技术标准与企业技术创新关系研究评述[J].经济学动态,2007(12):105-109.
[33] LEIPONEN A.Organization of knowledge and innovation:the case of Finnish business services[J].Industry and Innovation,2005,12(2):185-203.
[34] 余光胜,刘卫,唐郁.知识属性、情境依赖与默会知识共享条件研究[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(6):23-29.
[35] ZHAO X,LYNCH J G,CHEN Q.Reconsidering baron and kenny:myths and truths about mediation analysis[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2010,37(2):197-206.
[36] 陈瑞,郑毓煌,刘文静.中介效应分析:原理、程序、Bootstrap方法及其应用[J].营销科学学报,2013,9(4):120-135.
[37] 周永红,刘开军,蔡艳芳.产业集群生态化运作模式对企业成长的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(8):66-71.