长江经济带经济增长质量与生态环境优化耦合协调度研究
|
摘要
基于长江经济带108个城市2004～2016年数据,测算长江经济带经济增长质量与生态环境优化耦合协调度,实证研究两者耦合协调度影响因素,结果显示:长江经济带经济增长质量与生态环境优化耦合协调度值不断提升,处于弱耦合协调等级城市数量不断减少,处于中级以上等级的城市范围不断扩大。长江经济带城市生态环境优化得分高于经济增长质量,经济增长质量提升滞后于生态环境优化进程。外商直接投资、研发、制度质量促进经济增长质量与生态环境优化耦合协调发展,而经济增长、产业升级和环境规制降低耦合协调度。加大创新研发力度、提高外资准入门槛、建立长江经济带环境治理合作机制是提高耦合协调度关键。
Based on the data of 108 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2004 to 2016, this paper measures the coupling degree of growth quality and ecological environment optimization of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. And then, it analyzes the factors affecting the coupling degree. Results show that, the growth quality of the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the value of the eco-environmental optimization coupling degree have been continuously improved, and the number of cities in the weakly coupled coordination level has been decreasing, and the number of cities above the intermediate level has been expanding. The urban ecological environment optimization score of the Yangtze River Economic Belt is higher than the growth quality, and the growth quality improvement lags behind the ecological environment optimization process. Foreign direct investment, research and development, and system quality promote the coordinated development of growth quality and ecological environment optimization, while economic growth, industrial upgrading and environmental regulation reduce the coupling coordination degree. It puts some suggestions that intensifying innovation and research and development, improving the entry threshold for foreign investment, and establishing a cooperative mechanism for environmental governance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt are the key to improving coordination and coordination.
Based on the data of 108 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2004 to 2016, this paper measures the coupling degree of growth quality and ecological environment optimization of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. And then, it analyzes the factors affecting the coupling degree. Results show that, the growth quality of the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the value of the eco-environmental optimization coupling degree have been continuously improved, and the number of cities in the weakly coupled coordination level has been decreasing, and the number of cities above the intermediate level has been expanding. The urban ecological environment optimization score of the Yangtze River Economic Belt is higher than the growth quality, and the growth quality improvement lags behind the ecological environment optimization process. Foreign direct investment, research and development, and system quality promote the coordinated development of growth quality and ecological environment optimization, while economic growth, industrial upgrading and environmental regulation reduce the coupling coordination degree. It puts some suggestions that intensifying innovation and research and development, improving the entry threshold for foreign investment, and establishing a cooperative mechanism for environmental governance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt are the key to improving coordination and coordination.
引文
[1] Barro,Robert J. Quantity and Quality of Economic Growth[R].Working Papers of Central Bank of Chile,2002.
[2] Thomas,等.増长的质量[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2001. 29.
[3]李强,高楠.资源禀赋、制度质量与经济增长质量[J].广东财经大学学报,2017,32(1):4-12,23.
[4] B D Kamayev. The Speed and Quality of Economic Growth[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1983. 19-32.
[5] Ford J A, Steen J, Verreynne M L. How Environmental Regulations Affect Innovation in the Australian Oil and Gas Industry:Going Beyond the Porter Hypothesis[J]. Joural of Cleaner Production,2014,84(1):204-213.
[6]孙英杰,林春.试论环境规制与中国经济增长质量提升———基于环境库兹涅茨倒U型曲线[J].上海经济研究,2018(3):84-94.
[7]叶祥松,刘敬,王江波.经济增长质量与能源效率研究———以珠三角地区为例[J].江西财经大学学报,2017(5):3-13.
[8]杨斐,任保平.中国经济增长质量:碳排放视角的评价[J].软科学,2011(11):89-93.
[9]何兴邦.环境规制与中国经济增长质量———基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].当代经济科学,2018,40(2):1-10,124.
[10] Porter M E,Van Der Linde C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 66(9):97-118.
[11] Peng R. Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review[J]. Organization&Environment,2013,26(4):431-457.
[12]宋德勇,赵菲菲.环境规制、资本深化对劳动生产率的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(7):159-167.
[13]李强.产业升级与生态环境优化耦合度评价及影响因素研究———来自长江经济带108个城市的例证[J].现代经济探讨,2017(10):71-78.
[14]李强,高楠.长江经济带生态效率时空格局演化及影响因素研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2018,24(3):29-37.
[2] Thomas,等.増长的质量[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2001. 29.
[3]李强,高楠.资源禀赋、制度质量与经济增长质量[J].广东财经大学学报,2017,32(1):4-12,23.
[4] B D Kamayev. The Speed and Quality of Economic Growth[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1983. 19-32.
[5] Ford J A, Steen J, Verreynne M L. How Environmental Regulations Affect Innovation in the Australian Oil and Gas Industry:Going Beyond the Porter Hypothesis[J]. Joural of Cleaner Production,2014,84(1):204-213.
[6]孙英杰,林春.试论环境规制与中国经济增长质量提升———基于环境库兹涅茨倒U型曲线[J].上海经济研究,2018(3):84-94.
[7]叶祥松,刘敬,王江波.经济增长质量与能源效率研究———以珠三角地区为例[J].江西财经大学学报,2017(5):3-13.
[8]杨斐,任保平.中国经济增长质量:碳排放视角的评价[J].软科学,2011(11):89-93.
[9]何兴邦.环境规制与中国经济增长质量———基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].当代经济科学,2018,40(2):1-10,124.
[10] Porter M E,Van Der Linde C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 66(9):97-118.
[11] Peng R. Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review[J]. Organization&Environment,2013,26(4):431-457.
[12]宋德勇,赵菲菲.环境规制、资本深化对劳动生产率的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(7):159-167.
[13]李强.产业升级与生态环境优化耦合度评价及影响因素研究———来自长江经济带108个城市的例证[J].现代经济探讨,2017(10):71-78.
[14]李强,高楠.长江经济带生态效率时空格局演化及影响因素研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2018,24(3):29-37.