用户名: 密码: 验证码:
颗粒组成变化对粘质盐土含盐量和小麦生长的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Changes in Particle Composition Affect Salt Content and Wheat Growth in Clay Saline Soil
  • 作者:郑乾坤 ; 毛伟兵 ; 孙玉霞 ; 傅建国 ; 杨庆贺
  • 英文作者:Zheng Qiankun;Mao Weibing;Sun Yuxia;Fu Jianguo;Yang Qinghe;College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University;Binzhou City Xiaokaihe Yellow River Irrigation Administration;
  • 关键词:土壤改良材料 ; 粘质盐土 ; 土壤物理性状 ; 黄河三角洲 ; 冬小麦产量
  • 英文关键词:soil improvement materials;;clay saline soil;;soil physical properties;;the Yellow River Delta;;yield of winter wheat
  • 中文刊名:中国农学通报
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
  • 机构:山东农业大学水利土木工程学院;滨州市小开河引黄灌溉管理局;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:中国农学通报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:11
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目“引黄泥沙对黄河三角洲粘质盐土物理性状的改良研究”(41471184)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:94-100
  • 页数:7
  • CN:11-1984/S
  • ISSN:1000-6850
  • 分类号:S156.4;S512.1
摘要
为了研究引黄泥沙对土壤含盐量和冬小麦生长的影响,在滨海粘质盐土区进行了配沙(0 kg/m~2(CK)、10 kg/m~2(NS1)和20 kg/m~2(NS2))改良试验,分析了土壤含盐量、土壤水盐动态、冬小麦生长及产量等指标变化。结果表明:引黄泥沙与粘质盐土的颗粒组成差异明显,泥沙中极细沙粒可调控粘质盐土的颗粒组成。土壤含盐量随配沙量的增加而降低:春季NS1和NS2处理0~20 cm土壤含盐量分别比CK下降了45.88%和60.43%,秋季分别下降了9.32%和44.46%。与CK相比,NS1和NS2的冬小麦冬前分蘖、株高、地上部生物量和冬小麦产量均极显著(P<0.01)增加,NS1和NS2的冬小麦产量比CK分别增加32.98%和62.63%。因此,利用引黄泥沙调控粘质盐土的颗粒组成,可有效降低粘质盐土的土壤含盐量,对冬小麦的生长和产量具有十分明显的促进作用。
        To study the effect of sediment reclamation of Yellow River on soil salt content and the growth of winter wheat, we carried out a sand-addition experiment [0 kg/m~2(CK), 10 kg/m~2(NS1) and 20 kg/m~2(NS2)] in the coastal saline soil area, and analyzed the changes of soil salt content, soil water and salt dynamics, the growth and yield of winter wheat and other indicators. The results showed that: the particle composition of the Yellow River sediment and the clay saline soil were obviously different, and the fine sand particles in the Yellow River sediment could regulate the particle composition of the clay saline soil; furthermore, the soil salt content decreased with the increasing amount of sediment: compared with CK, the salt content of 0-20 cm layer under NS1 and NS2 was reduced by 45.88% and 60.43% in spring and decreased by 9.32% and 44.46%in autumn; compared with CK, the winter wheat tiller, plant height, shoot biomass and winter wheat yield under NS1 and NS2 were significantly increased(P<0.01), the winter wheat yield of NS1 and NS2 increased by32.98% and 62.63%, respectively. Therefore, Yellow River sediment can effectively regulate the particle composition of clay saline soil, reduce soil salt content, and promote growth as well as crop yield of winter wheat.
引文
[1]Wong V N L, Greene S B, Dalal R C, et al. Soil carbon dynamics in saline and sodic soils:a review[J].Soil Use Manage,2010,26:2-11.
    [2]Ca?edo M, Hawkins C P, Kefford B J, et al. Saving freshwater from salts[J].Science,2016,351:914-916.
    [3]李远.黄河三角洲土壤及其红粘层的地球化学特征与环境意义[D].烟台:中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所,2016.
    [4]范晓梅,刘高焕,唐志鹏,等.黄河三角洲土壤盐渍化影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):139-144.
    [5]武兰芳,柏林川,欧阳竹,等.山东省环渤海平原区粮食产出潜力与技术途径分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(6):682-689.
    [6]Guan B, Yu J b, Cao D, et al. The ecological restoration of heavily degraded saline wetland in the Yellow River Delta[J].Clean-Soil,Air, Water,2013,41(7):690-696.
    [7]李建国,濮励杰,朱明,等.土壤盐渍化研究现状及未来研究热点[J].地理学报,2012,67(9):1233-1245.
    [8]Machlis G.E. China addresses food and environment security[J].Science,2015,347,836.
    [9]吴景贵.土壤颗粒的功能研究进展[J].吉林农业大学学报,2008,30(4):529-537.
    [10]Pardo A, Amato M, Chiaranda FQ. Relationships between soil structure, root distribution and water uptake of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.). Plant growth and water distribution[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2000,13:39-45.
    [11]Lal R, Shukla M K. Principles of Soil Physics[J].New York,Academic, Marcel Dekker, Inc.2004:12-256.
    [12]Hong S, Hendrickx J M. Soil salinity in arid Riparian areas[J].American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting,2002,12:796-810.
    [13]Marsan F A, Biasioli M, Kralj T, et al. Metals in particle-size fractions of the soils of?ve European cities[J].Environmental Pollution,2008,152:73-81.
    [14]McNeill J R, Winiwarter V. Breaking the Sod:Humankind, History,and Soil[J].Science,2004,304:1627-1629.
    [15]Walter W D, Walsh D P, Farnsworth M L, et al. Soil clay content underlies prion infection odds[J].Nature Communications,2011b,2:200.
    [16]Qin S P, Hu C S, He X H, et al. Soil organic carbon, nutrients and relevant enzyme activities in particle-size fractions under conservational versus traditional agricultural management[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2010,45(3):152-159.
    [17]Zhou M H, Butterbach K, Vereecken H, et al. A meta-analysis of soil salinization effects on nitrogen pools, cycles and fluxes in coastal ecosystems[J].Global Change Biology,2017,23:1338-1352.
    [18]山东省土壤肥料工作站.山东土种志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1993:563-606.
    [19]贾利梅,毛伟兵,孙玉霞,等.不同改良材料对粘质盐土物理性状和棉花产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(13):81-87.
    [20]山东省土壤肥料工作站.山东土壤[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994:271-283.
    [21]陈建国,周文浩,陈强.小浪底水库运用十年黄河下游河道的再造床[J].水利学报,2012,43(2):127-135.
    [22]胡春宏,陈绪坚,陈建国.黄河水沙空间分布及其变化过程研究[J].水利学报,2008,39(5):518-527.
    [23]楚纯洁,李亚丽.近60年黄河干流水沙变化及其驱动因素[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):41-47.
    [24]胡健,孙蓬蓬,戴清,等.小浪底水库运用对下游引黄灌区的影响[J].节水灌溉,2010(3):26-29.
    [25]李保国,任图生,张佳宝.土壤物理学研究的现状、挑战与任务[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):810-816.
    [26]Fan X, Pedroli B, Liu G, et al. Soil salinity development in the yellow river delta in relation to groundwater dynamics[J].Land Degradation&Development,2012,23:175-189.
    [27]Northey J E, Christen E W, Ayars J E, et al. Occurrence and measurement of salinity stratification in shallow groundwater in the Murrumbidgee irrigation area[J].Agricultural Water Management,2006,81:23-40.
    [28]罗金明,邓伟,张晓平,等.盐渍土系统土壤水-地下水转化规律研究[J].生态环境,2007,16(6):1742-1747.
    [29]管孝艳,王少丽,高占义,等.盐渍化灌区土壤盐分的时空变异特征及其与地下水埋深的关系[J].生态学报,2012,32(4):1202-1210.
    [30]谭军利,康跃虎,焦艳平,等.不同种植年限覆膜滴灌盐碱地土壤盐分离子分布特征[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(6):59-63.
    [31]Lal R. Carbon management in agriculture soils[J].Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,2007,12:303-322.
    [32]裴自友,温辉芹,任永康,等.小麦的耐盐性及其改良研究进展[J].作物研究,2012,26(1):93-98.
    [33]蔡铁,徐海成,尹燕枰,等.外源IAA、GA3和ABA影响不同穗型小麦分蘖发生的机制[J].作物学报,2013,39(10):1835-1842.
    [34]马雅琴,翁跃进.引进春小麦种质耐盐性的鉴定评价[J].作物学报,2005,31(1):58-64.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700