用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同树龄米老排木材干燥工艺研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Drying Technology of Different Ages Mytilaria laosensis Timber
  • 作者:赵湘玉 ; 钟楷 ; 陈川富 ; 涂登云 ; 胡传双 ; 杨锦昌 ; 尹光天
  • 英文作者:Zhao Xiangyu;Zhong Kai;Chen Chuanfu;Tu Dengyun;Hu Chuanshuang;Yang Jinchang;Yin Guangtian;College of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University;Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry;
  • 关键词:米老排 ; 干燥特性 ; 百度试验法 ; 干燥工艺
  • 英文关键词:Mytilaria laosensis;;drying characteristic;;100℃ test method;;drying technology
  • 中文刊名:西南林业大学学报(自然科学)
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences)
  • 机构:华南农业大学材料与能源学院;中国林业科学研究院热带林业研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-15
  • 出版单位:西南林业大学学报(自然科学)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:02
  • 基金:广东省林业科技创新项目(2016KJCX004)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:190-194
  • 页数:5
  • CN:53-1218/S
  • ISSN:2095-1914
  • 分类号:S781.71
摘要
利用百度试验法研究树龄及树高对米老排木材干燥特性的影响,确定米老排木材干燥工艺。结果表明:随着树龄的增长,木材的短表裂数量增多,长表裂长度增大,截面变形程度逐渐减缓,扭曲度不断变大;在同一树龄中,上端木材的扭曲程度较下端木材更严重,下端木材的翘曲度较上段木材更严重;米老排木材的干燥初期开裂综合等级为5级,内部开裂为2级,截面变形为3级,扭曲为5级,翘曲变形为2级,干燥速度为2级;采用本研究干燥工艺,30 mm厚米老排木材从初含水率76.78%降至6.02%,干燥周期为16.12 d。干燥缺陷综合质量等级为2级,可满足实木制品质量要求。
        The effect of different ages and tree height on drying characteristics of Mytilaria laosensis timber was analyzed by using 100 ℃ test method and it's the most suitable drying technology was proposed. The results showed that the number of short surface check, the length of long surface check, and distortion raise distinctly while cross section deformation decreases gradually as the age increase. At the same age, the distortion of the top wood is severer than that of the bottom wood, but the result of warp is opposite. The early cracking degree of M.laosensis is grade 5, the internal cracking is grade 2, the section deformation is grade 3, the distortion is grade 5,the warp deformation is grade 2 and the drying speed is grade 2. By using the drying process given in this paper,the moisture content of 30 mm thickness different ages M.laosensis timber decreased from 76.78% to 6.02%, and the drying period was 16.12 d and the comprehensive quality grade of dry defects is grade II, which can meet the quality requirements of solid wood products.
引文
[1]成俊卿.中国木材志[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1992.
    [2]王雪峰,陆元昌,李婷婷,等.泛储木场理念下的米老排用材林营销[J].西南林业大学学报,2013,33(6):46-50.
    [3]李夷荔,林文莲.杉木米老排混交林水源涵养功能的研究[J].亚热带水土保持,2001,13(4):43-46.
    [4]林德喜,韩金发,肖正秋,等.米老排对土壤理化性质的改良[J].森林与环境学报,2000,20(1):62-65.
    [5]熊炀.赣南米老排天然更新调查[J].现代园艺,2015(4):18.
    [6]袁洁.8个米老排天然群体的遗传多样性研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2014.
    [7]余再鹏,黄志群,王民煌,等.亚热带米老排和杉木人工林土壤呼吸季节动态及其影响因子[J].林业科学,2014,50(8):7-14.
    [8]徐良.南方优良速生树种:米老排[J].热带林业,1984(2):53-60.
    [9]郭文福,蔡道雄,贾宏炎,等.米老排人工林生长规律的研究[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(5):585-589.
    [10]黄正暾,王顺峰,姜仪民,等.米老排的研究进展及其开发利用前景[J].南方农业学报,2009,40(9):1220-1223.
    [11]覃敏,尹光天,杨锦昌,等.米老排不同种源的表型性状变异分析[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(1):112-119.
    [12]覃敏,尹光天,杨锦昌,等.米老排不同种源苗期生长规律研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(1):53-57.
    [13]刁海林,蔡道雄,罗建举,等.米老排干燥特性研究[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(21):4415-4418.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700