摘要
从比较文明史来看,人类文明发展规律决定了世界秩序的逻辑,在工业文明推动社会进步的过程中人与自然的有机联系逐渐疏离,形成了"生态危机"。马克思主义经典作家在对资本主义批判中提出"自然的报复"观点,否定了资本主义的世界秩序与技术理性逻辑。习近平总书记的"生态文明"思想以中国传统文明的辩证理性与马克思主义理论为主体,将生态文明作为科技化时代新世界秩序的逻辑基础。
Judging from the history of comparative civilization,the law of the development of human civilization determines the logic of world order.Industrial civilization promotes social progress,while it also alienates the organic connection between human and nature,which forms an "ecological crisis".The classical Marxist writers put forward the conception of"revenge of nature"in the critique of capitalism,and they also negate the rational logic between the productive forces and technology under the world order of large industrialization.Xi Jinping's concept of "ecological civilization"is based on the dialectical rationality of traditional Chinese civilization and Marxism,and takes ecological civilization as the logical basis of the new world order in the era of science and technology.
引文
[1]塞缪尔·享廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M].周琪,刘绯,等译.北京:新华出版社,2002.
[2]琳恩·罗兹.美国与中国环境生态理论与实践的比较研究[J].江南大学学报,2018(1):64-68.
[3]恩格斯.自然辩证法[M]//中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集:第9卷.北京:人民出版社,2009:559-560.
[4]恩格斯.英国状况[M]//马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第一卷.北京:人民出版社,1956:667.
[5]马丁·耶尼克.环境政策:全球化的终结还是最终实现全球化——关于世界市场的生态决定因素的论纲[M]//乌·贝克,哈贝马斯,等.全球化与政治.王学东,柴方国,等译.北京:中央编译出版社,2000:324.
(1)笔者以前的论著中将工业化分为三个阶段,科技工业化为第三阶段,这种划分与四个工业化阶段意义相同,只是划分时期不同。此处则以通用的四阶段分法为主。