1992—2017年中国环境规划研究演进特征与趋势
|
摘要
伴随着生态文明建设被确立为国家战略,环境规划成为一项保障城市与区域可持续发展的重要公共政策工具。为从主观判断转向客观计量分析评价我国环境规划研究领域的知识生产特征和趋势取向,以更好地促进高质量发展,本研究引入CiteSpace软件对中国知网数据库中与环境规划相关的1170篇论文文献进行分析,全面梳理了我国1992—2017年环境规划文献脉络演进轨迹,归纳其中演进特征与趋势取向。研究发现:①从环境规划的概念提出开始,我国在该领域的研究一直处于不断完善与扩展的状态,高被引论文关注方向较为广泛,反映出研究热点议题的多元;②研究学者合作网络初步浮现,但研究的学科多元交叉性仍有待提高,"高产"机构研究持续性较好,合作较为多元,但地域分布的不均衡性对我国多样环境问题解决所需的近域知识有效供给带来制约;③环境规划领域的研究以与生态环境或环境规划相关的具体问题为对象,多结合当期的经济社会与国家政策环境来进行开展,呈现出持续性与时效性相结合的特点,并逐渐由方法技术视角转向政策工具视角,即由仅解决环境问题为取向的研究转向将环境规划作为解决公共政策问题的研究;近期研究热点指向多规合一与空间规划,以及绿色发展理念的探讨,更加强调其与城市与区域规划之间的密切联系。
With the establishment of ecological civilization as a national strategy, environmental planning has become an important public policy tool to ensure the sustainable development of cities and regions. In order to shift from subjective judgment to objective measurement analysis for evaluating the knowledge production characteristics and trend orientation in the field of environmental planning research in China, to better promote high quality development. The research introduces CiteSpace software to analyze 1170 papers related to environmental planning in China Knowledge Network database, comprehensively sorts out the evolution track of environmental planning literature in China from 1992 to 2017, and summarizes the evolution characteristics and trend orientation. The research finds that:(1) Since the concept establishment of environmental planning, China's research in this field has been in a state of continuous improvement and expansion, and the high cited literature has a wide range of concerns.(2) The cooperative network of research scholars has been formed, but the multi-disciplinary nature of research still needs to be improved. The research in "high-yield" institutions is more sustainable and the cooperation is more diversified, but the construction of cooperation networks still needs to be strengthened, and the unbalance geographical distribution has brought constraints to the effective supply of near-field knowledge required for the resolution of diverse environmental problems in China.(3) The research in the field of environmental planning is based on the specific problems related to environmental or environmental planning, combined with the current economic society and national policy environment, showing the combination of continuity and timeliness, and gradually shifting from the perspective of method and technology to the perspective of policy tools, from the research that only solves environmental problems to the study of environmental planning as a solution to public policy issues; recent research hotspots point to the discussion of multi-regulation and spatial planning, and the concept of green development, with more emphasis its close relationship with urban and regional planning.
With the establishment of ecological civilization as a national strategy, environmental planning has become an important public policy tool to ensure the sustainable development of cities and regions. In order to shift from subjective judgment to objective measurement analysis for evaluating the knowledge production characteristics and trend orientation in the field of environmental planning research in China, to better promote high quality development. The research introduces CiteSpace software to analyze 1170 papers related to environmental planning in China Knowledge Network database, comprehensively sorts out the evolution track of environmental planning literature in China from 1992 to 2017, and summarizes the evolution characteristics and trend orientation. The research finds that:(1) Since the concept establishment of environmental planning, China's research in this field has been in a state of continuous improvement and expansion, and the high cited literature has a wide range of concerns.(2) The cooperative network of research scholars has been formed, but the multi-disciplinary nature of research still needs to be improved. The research in "high-yield" institutions is more sustainable and the cooperation is more diversified, but the construction of cooperation networks still needs to be strengthened, and the unbalance geographical distribution has brought constraints to the effective supply of near-field knowledge required for the resolution of diverse environmental problems in China.(3) The research in the field of environmental planning is based on the specific problems related to environmental or environmental planning, combined with the current economic society and national policy environment, showing the combination of continuity and timeliness, and gradually shifting from the perspective of method and technology to the perspective of policy tools, from the research that only solves environmental problems to the study of environmental planning as a solution to public policy issues; recent research hotspots point to the discussion of multi-regulation and spatial planning, and the concept of green development, with more emphasis its close relationship with urban and regional planning.
引文
[1]李琬,孙斌栋.西方经济地理学的知识结构与研究热点--基于CiteSpace的图谱量化研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(4):7-12,45-45.
[2]潘黎,王素.近十年来中国教育研究热点主线的计量研究--基于八种CSSCI教育学期刊文献关键词共现知识图谱的分析[J].教育研究与实验,2011(6):20-24.
[3]李思婧,岳泉.CNKI主题标引分析[J].情报科学,2011,29(7):1002-1006.
[4]何璇,毛惠萍,牛冬杰,等.生态规划及其相关概念演变和关系辨析[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(8):2360-2368.
[5]PERITZ B C.On the objectives of citation analysis:Problems of theory and method[J].Journal of the American society for information science,1992,43(6):448-451.
[6]MOED H F.The impact-factors debate:the ISI’s uses and limits[J].Nature,2002,415(6873):731-732.
[7]李有平,欧阳进良.科技评估在科技管理中作用的分析与认识[J].中国科技论坛,2009(5):7-11.
[8]徐长久,万玉山,冯俊生,等.我国环境规划现状及存在问题分析[J].煤炭技术,2007,26(3):1-3.
(1)鉴于中文核心期刊中的文献仅能溯源到1992年,且2018年的文献尚不完全,故本文选择时间跨度为1992—2017年。
[2]潘黎,王素.近十年来中国教育研究热点主线的计量研究--基于八种CSSCI教育学期刊文献关键词共现知识图谱的分析[J].教育研究与实验,2011(6):20-24.
[3]李思婧,岳泉.CNKI主题标引分析[J].情报科学,2011,29(7):1002-1006.
[4]何璇,毛惠萍,牛冬杰,等.生态规划及其相关概念演变和关系辨析[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(8):2360-2368.
[5]PERITZ B C.On the objectives of citation analysis:Problems of theory and method[J].Journal of the American society for information science,1992,43(6):448-451.
[6]MOED H F.The impact-factors debate:the ISI’s uses and limits[J].Nature,2002,415(6873):731-732.
[7]李有平,欧阳进良.科技评估在科技管理中作用的分析与认识[J].中国科技论坛,2009(5):7-11.
[8]徐长久,万玉山,冯俊生,等.我国环境规划现状及存在问题分析[J].煤炭技术,2007,26(3):1-3.
(1)鉴于中文核心期刊中的文献仅能溯源到1992年,且2018年的文献尚不完全,故本文选择时间跨度为1992—2017年。
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |