碳标签政策对供应链减排决策行为的影响
|
摘要
碳标签可以标识产品生命周期所产生的碳排放量,具有更低碳排放量的产品可增加消费者的支付意愿,从而促使供应链上下游企业产生减排意愿。基于供应链视角,采用博弈论方法对供应链的减排行为进行研究,结果表明上下游企业的减排贡献与技术减排能力成正比,即在碳排放标签政策的市场调节下,减排资源将向减排能力强的企业转移。同时,领导者企业将支持而跟随者企业可能抵制碳标签政策的实施,政府在碳排放政策制定中应对跟随者企业给予适当的倾斜。
Carbon labels can identify the carbon emissions from the product life cycle. Products with lower carbon emissions can increase consumers' willingness to pay, thus prompting upstream and downstream companies in the supply chain to create a willingness to reduce emissions. Based on the perspective of supply chain, the game theory was used to study the emission reduction behavior of enterprises. Results show that the emission reduction contribution of upstream and downstream enterprises is proportional to the ability of the emission reduction technologies, that is, under the market regulation of carbon emission labelling policy, emission reduction resources will be transferred to enterprises with stronger emission reduction abilities. Leading enterprises will support the implementation of carbon labelling policies, while the following ones may resist it. Therefore, governments should give some priority to follower companies in their carbon policy formulation.
Carbon labels can identify the carbon emissions from the product life cycle. Products with lower carbon emissions can increase consumers' willingness to pay, thus prompting upstream and downstream companies in the supply chain to create a willingness to reduce emissions. Based on the perspective of supply chain, the game theory was used to study the emission reduction behavior of enterprises. Results show that the emission reduction contribution of upstream and downstream enterprises is proportional to the ability of the emission reduction technologies, that is, under the market regulation of carbon emission labelling policy, emission reduction resources will be transferred to enterprises with stronger emission reduction abilities. Leading enterprises will support the implementation of carbon labelling policies, while the following ones may resist it. Therefore, governments should give some priority to follower companies in their carbon policy formulation.
引文
[1] 胡莹菲, 王润, 余运俊. 中国建立碳标签体系的经验借鉴与展望[J]. 产业经济, 2010(3): 16-19.
[2] 余运俊, 王润, 孙艳伟, 等. 建立中国碳标签体系研究[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2010, 20(5): 9-14.
[3] Carbon Disclosure Project. Carbon disclosure project supply chain report 2011: migrating to a low carbon economy through leadership and collaboration[R]. London, 2011.
[4] BENJAAFAR S, LI Y, DASKIN M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chain: insights from simple models. Working Paper, University of Minnesota, 2011.
[5] 赵道致, 原白云, 徐春明, 等. 低碳供应链纵向合作减排的动态优化[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(7): 1340-1344.
[6] LUO Z, CHEN X, WANG X. The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2016, 253(2): 392-403.
[7] 王芹鹏, 赵道致. 两级供应链减排与促销的合作策略[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(2): 307-314.
[8] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 44-52.
[9] 何华, 马常松, 吴忠和. 碳限额与交易政策下考虑绿色技术投入的定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 74-84.
[10] 聂佳佳, 李伟琛. 需求波动下政府补贴对低碳产品选择的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(1): 22-29.
[11] WANG Q, ZHAO D, HE L. Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016(120): 72-84.
[12] DU S, HU L, SONG M. Production optimization consideringenvironmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016(112): 1600-1607.
[13] 申成然, 刘小媛. 考虑风险规避与碳减排的双渠道供应链决策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2019, 55(1): 241-247
[14] 李晓钟, 刘振宇. FDI对我国制造业碳排放影响分析[J]. 对外经济贸易大学学报, 2013(1): 95-103.
[15] 刘倩晨. 考虑碳排放的冷链物流研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2010.
[2] 余运俊, 王润, 孙艳伟, 等. 建立中国碳标签体系研究[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境, 2010, 20(5): 9-14.
[3] Carbon Disclosure Project. Carbon disclosure project supply chain report 2011: migrating to a low carbon economy through leadership and collaboration[R]. London, 2011.
[4] BENJAAFAR S, LI Y, DASKIN M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chain: insights from simple models. Working Paper, University of Minnesota, 2011.
[5] 赵道致, 原白云, 徐春明, 等. 低碳供应链纵向合作减排的动态优化[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(7): 1340-1344.
[6] LUO Z, CHEN X, WANG X. The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2016, 253(2): 392-403.
[7] 王芹鹏, 赵道致. 两级供应链减排与促销的合作策略[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(2): 307-314.
[8] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 44-52.
[9] 何华, 马常松, 吴忠和. 碳限额与交易政策下考虑绿色技术投入的定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 74-84.
[10] 聂佳佳, 李伟琛. 需求波动下政府补贴对低碳产品选择的影响[J]. 工业工程, 2018, 21(1): 22-29.
[11] WANG Q, ZHAO D, HE L. Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016(120): 72-84.
[12] DU S, HU L, SONG M. Production optimization consideringenvironmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016(112): 1600-1607.
[13] 申成然, 刘小媛. 考虑风险规避与碳减排的双渠道供应链决策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2019, 55(1): 241-247
[14] 李晓钟, 刘振宇. FDI对我国制造业碳排放影响分析[J]. 对外经济贸易大学学报, 2013(1): 95-103.
[15] 刘倩晨. 考虑碳排放的冷链物流研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2010.