全面依法治国思想传播中的角色定位问题

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：An Analysis of the Role Orientation in the Dissemination of the Thought of Ruling the Country by Law 作者：周宏 ; 卜荣华 英文作者：ZHOU Hong;BU Rong-hua;School of Marxism,Anhui University of Technology; 关键词：依法治国 ; 思想传播 ; 角色定位 英文关键词：governing the country in full compliance with the law;;ideological communication;;role orientation 中文刊名：天水行政学院学报 英文刊名：Journal of Tianshui College of Administration 机构：安徽工业大学马克思主义学院; 出版日期：2019-02-15 出版单位：天水行政学院学报 年：2019 期：01 基金：2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“全面依法治国思想的传播环境研究”(项目编号:18YJA710064);; 2013年安徽工业大学思政理论课专项研究课题重点项目“自媒体传播中道德舆论调控问题研究”(项目编号:13SZZXZD005)的阶段性成果 语种：中文; 页：14-18 页数：5 CN：62-5123/D ISSN：1009-6566 分类号：D920.0

摘要

全面依法治国方略的提出体现了国家治理从"法制"到"法治"重心转移的必然逻辑,对全面依法治国思想的传播则是风险社会下党实现自身历史使命的要求。需要对法治思想传播的决策方、传播方与受众方的角色予以明晰的定位。可将三方共同建构全面依法治国思想传播的共同体作为追求的目标。在实际的传播中,三方参与主体的不当定位会对传播效果产生消极影响。可以通过思想传播决策方的准确释法、严格执法来凸显"把关人"角色;通过强化传播方的社会责任,增强其传播情感;通过对受众方虚拟"赋权"的适当限制而培育其沟通交往理性,克服"信息茧房"对其法治意识形成的阻碍等来优化三方的传播参与角色。
        The proposal of comprehensively governing the country according to law embodies the logical necessity of the shift of national governance from the"legal system"to the"rule of law".The dissemination of the idea of comprehensively governing the country according to law is the requirement of the Communist Party of China to realize its historical mission under the risk society. There is a need for a clear positioning of the role of the decision maker,the propagator and the audience in the dissemination of the rule of law. According to law,the community that the three parties jointly construct a comprehensive system of ruling the country can be the goal pursued. In the actual dissemination,the improper positioning of the three parties involved in the subject will have a negative impact on the communication effect. Through the idea of disseminating the accurate interpretation of the decision-making party and strict law enforcement,the role of"gatekeeper"can be highlighted; by strengthening the social responsibility of the communication party,the communication emotion can be enhanced; and the communication can be fostered through appropriate restrictions on the virtual "empowerment"of the audience. Communicative rationality,overcoming the obstacles formed by the "information mortuary"to its rule of law,to optimize the role of the three parties in the dissemination of participation.

引文

[1]许晶.从风险社会到命运共同体[J].长沙理工大学学报,2016,(3):59.
    [2](加)马歇尔·麦克卢汉.理解媒介:论人的延伸[M].南京:译林出版社,2011.7.
    [3]刘婷.微传播环境对青年亚文化的影响[J].学术探索,2014,(10):81.
    [4]江必新.“互联网+”与“全面依法治国”需要处理好的“几个关系”[J].人民法治,2015,(12):9.
    [5][7]胡百精.互联网与集体记忆[J].中国高校社会科学,2014,(3):105,105
    [6]黄瑞琪.沟通、背叛和实践:哈贝马斯八十论集[M].台湾:台湾允晨文化实业股份有限公司,2010.370.
    [8](古希腊)亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1965.199.
    [9](美)伯尔曼.法律与宗教[M].北京:三联书店,1991.21.
    [10](美)尼尔·波兹曼.娱乐至死[M].北京:中信出版集团有限公司,2015.4.
    [11]王婧杰.“碎片化”传播环境下全民泛阅读现象分析[J].新闻研究导刊,2016,(5):90.