孙吴—嘉荫盆地地层序列、盆地演化及含油气远景
|
摘要
孙吴-嘉荫盆地是大庆外围盆地面积较大的盆地之一,勘探程度一直较低。为了配合国家油气资源战略选区与评价项目的开展,发展大庆油田中长期勘探领域接替区,本文主要从地层、构造及含油气远景三个方面对孙吴-嘉荫盆地进行了进一步的研究。通过岩石地层、生物地层和年代地层的分析对比,形成了孙吴-嘉荫盆地综合地层序列,进一步落实了重大地质界面及其时代归属;通过对区内2口井和地震资料进行了层序地层学分析,初步建立了本区的层序地层格架。在沾河断陷识别出6个、嘉荫断陷识别出7个地震层序;依据重磁、地震资料重新给出盆地的控陷断裂和和构造分区,认为盆地发育早白垩世控陷正断层、古近纪喜山运动形成的逆断层及平移走滑断层,其形成机制为伸展、压扭和张扭。给出的最新一级构造分区为四断三隆”。盆地内控制一、二级构造单元切割基岩的大断裂发育,小断裂不发育,主要以北东、北北东向正断层为主。两断陷区主要发育张性断块构造、盖层滑脱型及压性断块3种构造样式。认为盆地主要存在T1、T2、T3、T4、T5五个不整合面,体现了热隆张裂、裂陷、坳陷、萎缩四个演化阶段;通过野外露头观察、单井沉积微相、地震相分析建立了本区的沉积相类型和识别标志并给出了盆地的沉积演化过程;通过层序地层学研究,认为本区沾河断陷垂向上存在“两生、三储、三盖”的生储盖组合,嘉荫断陷垂向上存在“三生、三储、三盖”的生储盖组合,盆地应该以下白垩统为主要勘探目标。通过对盆地基本石油地质条件的分析,认为盆地具备较高的生油潜力,孙吴断陷的腰屯断凹、沾河断陷的沾河向斜、嘉荫断陷的乌拉嘎凹陷为有利勘探远景区,圈闭类型以断层-岩性圈闭、岩性圈闭两种类型为主。
With the decreasing of oil & gas available reserve in Songliao Basin, sedimentary basins outer Daqing prospect-area became the major superseded area. Sunwu-Jiayin Basin extends 22810km2, and this acreage makes it the third one in those outer Daqing prospect area basins. The field geological works have approved the basin successions are Cretaceous strata, and Taoqihe formation, Yongancun Formation, and Taipinglinchang Formation yield dark mudstone, the total thickness reaches 616m. The organic types are mainly II-type, and have achieved low-mature phase. The oil contained sandstones had been found, and with OGT (oil and gas traces) occurrence. The resource extent is counted as 0.888~2.986×108t by volume-density method. This result indicates a considerable oil produce potential, and the basin has been confirmed the tactic basin. However, the basin research level still quite low, most of the study are all based on outcrop observation, section measurement, and geophysical compendium perambulation. Cross-researches also lack between those methods, thus, current dissertation’s purpose is to fill up this vacancy. Integrated studies including stratigraphy, tectonics, sedimentary and oil & gas reserving perspective, which is based on outcrop stratigraphic data and geophysical acquired gravity-magnetism-electricity, seismic and borehole data, can not only provide valuable information on understanding the formation and evolution of Mesozoic and Cenozoic rift basin systems, but also is the need of tactic exploration and preferring.
Sunwu-Jiayin Basin has a typical dualistic structure, they are pre-Mesozoic basement and Mesozoic-Cenozoic cap formation. The basin fill successions from bottom up are Early Cretaceous Ningyuancun Formation and Taoqihe Formation, Late Cretaceous Yongancun Formation, Taipinglinchang Formation, Yuliangzi Formation and Furao Formation, Paleocene Wuyun Formation, Miocene-Pliocene Sunwu Formation, and Quaternary. A synthetical strata sequence and geochronologic framework has been established by the studies of lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and chronology. The age of Ningyuancun Formation is early Early Cretaceous, about Valanginian-Hauterivian, the age of the lower member of Taoqihe Formation is Hauterivian–Barremian, the age of the upper member of Taoqihe Formation is late Early Cretaceous Aptian–Albian, the age of Yongancun Formation is Late Cretaceous Cenomanian–Turonian, the age of Taipinglinchang Formation is Santonian–Campanian, the age of Yuliangzi Formation is late Late Cretaceous, about Campanian–early-middle Maastrichtian, and the age of Furao Formation is latest Late Cretaceous, about late Maastrichtian.
Identify signs are established to make analyses of seismic and borehole data, and to upbuild sequence stratigraphic framework. Sections clearly showed the Xunke-Zhanhe and Jiayin are all fault subsidence and sag superimposed Basins. Sonic data from two bore-holes have been used to make seismic synthetical records. Five seismic reflecting boundaries (T1-1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) are demarcated, and they are also the unconformity boundaries of the sequences. T3 is the boundary separated the fault-subsidence phase and the sag phase in both Zhanhe and Jiayin fault-subsidence. Correspondingly, 4 seismic sequences could be confirmed:
1) T5-T4 seismic sequence
This sequence is composed of volcano-sedimentary successions Ningyuancun Formation, whose litho is buildup with gray-variedness rhyolite tuff lava, gray mud siltstone. These strata distributed all around the basin. Two secondary sequences could be identified in fault-subsidence, and they correspond to the lower and upper members of Ningyuancun Formation.
2) T4-T3 seismic sequence
This sequence is equivalent to the deposits of Taoqihe Formation, and two secondary sequences correspond to lower and upper member of Taoqihe Formation could be subdivided in both Zhanhe and Jiayin fault-subsidence, and the Taoqihe Formation could be subdivided into lower and upper member. The lower part of this formation is composed of coarseclastic sediments conglomerate, and gradually changed to gray-green sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone.
3) T3-T2 seismic sequence
This sequence is composed of Late Cretaceous Yongancun , Taipinglinchang and Yuliangzi Formation which is widely distributed in most of the current area, and absent in the uplift areas along the sides of Jiayin uplift and subsidence. The strata are composed of gray mudstone, mud siltstone, and silt feldspar sandstone.
4) T2-T1 seismic sequence
This sequence is composed of Paleocene Wuyun Formation and Miocene-Pliocene Sunwu Formation, and distributed in the most area of Zhanhe fault-subsidence and the Wulaga sag in Jiayin fault-subsidence. The strata are mainly composed of gray mudstone, green-gray mud siltstone, siltstone corresbedding.
Gravity-magnetism and seismic data are combined to provide new views on the location of subsidence control faults and tectonic divisions, and the Sunwu-Jiayin Basin is subdivided four fault-subsidence and three uplift, from west to east are Sunwu fault-subsidence, Maolanhe uplift, Xunke-Zhanhe fault-subsidence, Furao uplift, Wuyun fault subsidence, Wuyunhe uplift, and Jiayin fault-subsidence. The main subsidence control and boundary faults are Maolanhe, Zhanhe, Kuerbinghe , Pingyanhe , Wulagahe and Shuanghezhen Fault.
Faults distributions are newly reflected by the seismic reflecting characters. Most of them are NE, NNE trend basement fault, and small fault are few. 15 faults are recognized in each two fault-subsidences (Jianyin and Zhanhe), and the extended main faults are in domain, pressed contrary faults and press-wring strike slip fault. Those faults show disciplinarian characters. Syn-rift faults are NNE trend in domain. In Ximalaya Period, pressures from northeast made the faults active again, and turned to be strike-slip faults and contrary thrust slip faults, the trends are mainly NW trend and EW trend. Therefore, faults in the basin have the multi-phases active characters, especially the deep faults and regional faults, and with volcanism activity in different periods.
Based on the study in the fault-subsidence, accompanied with different tectonics movement form, 4 structural mode, spread fault block, twist tectonic assemble, cover surge, and suppress fault block are developed in two fault-subsidences. Spread fault block mode is the main extension represent, and also one of the main tectonic visages.
The basin evolution comes through a history of two steges, Early Cretaceous rift (Ningyuancun and Taoqihe) and Late Cretaceous sag (Yongancun and Taipinglinchang).
Based on the field observation and recognition of single bore-hole face and seismic faces, the sedimentary faces in the basin have been studied, and six kinds of sedimentary systems including alluvial, delta, braid river, meander delta, lake, lake bottom fan. volcanic rocks in Ningyuancun Formation could be divided into 3 types: crater-flooding, flooding- erupt, and volcano-sedimentary faces. Based on the vertical sequences of the two bore-hole data and complanate distribution of each sequences faces, we suggest: During the sedimentary period of early Cretaceous Ningyuncun Formation, the fault-subsidence extensively extended, and deposited alluvial-fan delta-volcanic deposits, this sequence could be correlated with the Huoshiling and Shahezi Formation in Songliao Basin. During the sedimentary period of early Cretaceous Taoqihe Formation, the fault-subsidence subsidized quickly, and deposited fan delta-braid river-lake faces, this sequence could be correlated with the Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin. During the sedimentary period of late Cretaceous Yongancun,Taipinglinchang and Yuliangzi Formation, the basin subsidized steadily. Yongancun Formation, which is composed of river delta-lake faces, could be correlated with Yaojia Formation in Songliao Basin. Taipinglinchang Formation, which is fan delta- shore shallow lake faces, could be correlated with Nenjiang Formation in Songliao Basin. Late Cretaceous Yuliangzi Formation could be correlated with the Sifangtai-Mingshui Formation, but during this period, most area of NE China is in a environment of press, uplift, and shrink distortion geodynamic progress, only a small part of this period sediments exposed in the east of basin. Paleocene Wuyun Formation is partly exist in the basin, and is composed of braid river-braid river delta-lake faces. Oligocene to Pliocene Sunwu Formation are not showed in the seismic section, but the litho is alluvial-fan delta-lake faces. The ends of Wuyun Formation and Sunwu Formation sedimentary period the basin come through the strong tectonic movement, the faults contrary trusted, and stratum were widely eroded.
Resulted from the faces study, the basin has two oil generating stratum, three reservoirs, and three covers. The first oil generating strata is Taoqihe Formation, and the second one is Yongancun Formation in Jiayin fault-subsidence. The first good coarse clastics reservoirs are in the top of Ningyuancun Formation and the bottom of Taoqihe Formation, the second one is in the top of Taoqihe Formation and the bottom of Yongancun Formation, and the third one is in the top of Yongancun Formation and the bottom of Taipinglinchang Formation. The three covers are middle-upper part of Taoqihe Formation, middle-lower part of Yongancun Formation, and Taipinglinchang Formation.
Based on those above research conclusion and the petroleum generating conditions, we consider the organism abundance is high in Sunwu-Jiayin Basin, mixed organic well developed (II type in domain), and they are in low mature to mature phase, so the basin has a good petroleum generating condition, and the reservoirs and cover layers also well matched. The perspected resource extent is counted as 2.1×108t by volume-density method, this means a big resource extent. Yaotun fault concave in Sunwu fault subsidence, Zhanhe syncline in Zhanhe fault subsidence, and Wulaga sag have the big acreage and deep burying, with rich organic matter deposited, have the conditions to form the oil & gas, and they are favorable exploration perspective areas. Encirclements are fault-lithologic, lithologic two types in domain.
With the decreasing of oil & gas available reserve in Songliao Basin, sedimentary basins outer Daqing prospect-area became the major superseded area. Sunwu-Jiayin Basin extends 22810km2, and this acreage makes it the third one in those outer Daqing prospect area basins. The field geological works have approved the basin successions are Cretaceous strata, and Taoqihe formation, Yongancun Formation, and Taipinglinchang Formation yield dark mudstone, the total thickness reaches 616m. The organic types are mainly II-type, and have achieved low-mature phase. The oil contained sandstones had been found, and with OGT (oil and gas traces) occurrence. The resource extent is counted as 0.888~2.986×108t by volume-density method. This result indicates a considerable oil produce potential, and the basin has been confirmed the tactic basin. However, the basin research level still quite low, most of the study are all based on outcrop observation, section measurement, and geophysical compendium perambulation. Cross-researches also lack between those methods, thus, current dissertation’s purpose is to fill up this vacancy. Integrated studies including stratigraphy, tectonics, sedimentary and oil & gas reserving perspective, which is based on outcrop stratigraphic data and geophysical acquired gravity-magnetism-electricity, seismic and borehole data, can not only provide valuable information on understanding the formation and evolution of Mesozoic and Cenozoic rift basin systems, but also is the need of tactic exploration and preferring.
Sunwu-Jiayin Basin has a typical dualistic structure, they are pre-Mesozoic basement and Mesozoic-Cenozoic cap formation. The basin fill successions from bottom up are Early Cretaceous Ningyuancun Formation and Taoqihe Formation, Late Cretaceous Yongancun Formation, Taipinglinchang Formation, Yuliangzi Formation and Furao Formation, Paleocene Wuyun Formation, Miocene-Pliocene Sunwu Formation, and Quaternary. A synthetical strata sequence and geochronologic framework has been established by the studies of lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and chronology. The age of Ningyuancun Formation is early Early Cretaceous, about Valanginian-Hauterivian, the age of the lower member of Taoqihe Formation is Hauterivian–Barremian, the age of the upper member of Taoqihe Formation is late Early Cretaceous Aptian–Albian, the age of Yongancun Formation is Late Cretaceous Cenomanian–Turonian, the age of Taipinglinchang Formation is Santonian–Campanian, the age of Yuliangzi Formation is late Late Cretaceous, about Campanian–early-middle Maastrichtian, and the age of Furao Formation is latest Late Cretaceous, about late Maastrichtian.
Identify signs are established to make analyses of seismic and borehole data, and to upbuild sequence stratigraphic framework. Sections clearly showed the Xunke-Zhanhe and Jiayin are all fault subsidence and sag superimposed Basins. Sonic data from two bore-holes have been used to make seismic synthetical records. Five seismic reflecting boundaries (T1-1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) are demarcated, and they are also the unconformity boundaries of the sequences. T3 is the boundary separated the fault-subsidence phase and the sag phase in both Zhanhe and Jiayin fault-subsidence. Correspondingly, 4 seismic sequences could be confirmed:
1) T5-T4 seismic sequence
This sequence is composed of volcano-sedimentary successions Ningyuancun Formation, whose litho is buildup with gray-variedness rhyolite tuff lava, gray mud siltstone. These strata distributed all around the basin. Two secondary sequences could be identified in fault-subsidence, and they correspond to the lower and upper members of Ningyuancun Formation.
2) T4-T3 seismic sequence
This sequence is equivalent to the deposits of Taoqihe Formation, and two secondary sequences correspond to lower and upper member of Taoqihe Formation could be subdivided in both Zhanhe and Jiayin fault-subsidence, and the Taoqihe Formation could be subdivided into lower and upper member. The lower part of this formation is composed of coarseclastic sediments conglomerate, and gradually changed to gray-green sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone.
3) T3-T2 seismic sequence
This sequence is composed of Late Cretaceous Yongancun , Taipinglinchang and Yuliangzi Formation which is widely distributed in most of the current area, and absent in the uplift areas along the sides of Jiayin uplift and subsidence. The strata are composed of gray mudstone, mud siltstone, and silt feldspar sandstone.
4) T2-T1 seismic sequence
This sequence is composed of Paleocene Wuyun Formation and Miocene-Pliocene Sunwu Formation, and distributed in the most area of Zhanhe fault-subsidence and the Wulaga sag in Jiayin fault-subsidence. The strata are mainly composed of gray mudstone, green-gray mud siltstone, siltstone corresbedding.
Gravity-magnetism and seismic data are combined to provide new views on the location of subsidence control faults and tectonic divisions, and the Sunwu-Jiayin Basin is subdivided four fault-subsidence and three uplift, from west to east are Sunwu fault-subsidence, Maolanhe uplift, Xunke-Zhanhe fault-subsidence, Furao uplift, Wuyun fault subsidence, Wuyunhe uplift, and Jiayin fault-subsidence. The main subsidence control and boundary faults are Maolanhe, Zhanhe, Kuerbinghe , Pingyanhe , Wulagahe and Shuanghezhen Fault.
Faults distributions are newly reflected by the seismic reflecting characters. Most of them are NE, NNE trend basement fault, and small fault are few. 15 faults are recognized in each two fault-subsidences (Jianyin and Zhanhe), and the extended main faults are in domain, pressed contrary faults and press-wring strike slip fault. Those faults show disciplinarian characters. Syn-rift faults are NNE trend in domain. In Ximalaya Period, pressures from northeast made the faults active again, and turned to be strike-slip faults and contrary thrust slip faults, the trends are mainly NW trend and EW trend. Therefore, faults in the basin have the multi-phases active characters, especially the deep faults and regional faults, and with volcanism activity in different periods.
Based on the study in the fault-subsidence, accompanied with different tectonics movement form, 4 structural mode, spread fault block, twist tectonic assemble, cover surge, and suppress fault block are developed in two fault-subsidences. Spread fault block mode is the main extension represent, and also one of the main tectonic visages.
The basin evolution comes through a history of two steges, Early Cretaceous rift (Ningyuancun and Taoqihe) and Late Cretaceous sag (Yongancun and Taipinglinchang).
Based on the field observation and recognition of single bore-hole face and seismic faces, the sedimentary faces in the basin have been studied, and six kinds of sedimentary systems including alluvial, delta, braid river, meander delta, lake, lake bottom fan. volcanic rocks in Ningyuancun Formation could be divided into 3 types: crater-flooding, flooding- erupt, and volcano-sedimentary faces. Based on the vertical sequences of the two bore-hole data and complanate distribution of each sequences faces, we suggest: During the sedimentary period of early Cretaceous Ningyuncun Formation, the fault-subsidence extensively extended, and deposited alluvial-fan delta-volcanic deposits, this sequence could be correlated with the Huoshiling and Shahezi Formation in Songliao Basin. During the sedimentary period of early Cretaceous Taoqihe Formation, the fault-subsidence subsidized quickly, and deposited fan delta-braid river-lake faces, this sequence could be correlated with the Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin. During the sedimentary period of late Cretaceous Yongancun,Taipinglinchang and Yuliangzi Formation, the basin subsidized steadily. Yongancun Formation, which is composed of river delta-lake faces, could be correlated with Yaojia Formation in Songliao Basin. Taipinglinchang Formation, which is fan delta- shore shallow lake faces, could be correlated with Nenjiang Formation in Songliao Basin. Late Cretaceous Yuliangzi Formation could be correlated with the Sifangtai-Mingshui Formation, but during this period, most area of NE China is in a environment of press, uplift, and shrink distortion geodynamic progress, only a small part of this period sediments exposed in the east of basin. Paleocene Wuyun Formation is partly exist in the basin, and is composed of braid river-braid river delta-lake faces. Oligocene to Pliocene Sunwu Formation are not showed in the seismic section, but the litho is alluvial-fan delta-lake faces. The ends of Wuyun Formation and Sunwu Formation sedimentary period the basin come through the strong tectonic movement, the faults contrary trusted, and stratum were widely eroded.
Resulted from the faces study, the basin has two oil generating stratum, three reservoirs, and three covers. The first oil generating strata is Taoqihe Formation, and the second one is Yongancun Formation in Jiayin fault-subsidence. The first good coarse clastics reservoirs are in the top of Ningyuancun Formation and the bottom of Taoqihe Formation, the second one is in the top of Taoqihe Formation and the bottom of Yongancun Formation, and the third one is in the top of Yongancun Formation and the bottom of Taipinglinchang Formation. The three covers are middle-upper part of Taoqihe Formation, middle-lower part of Yongancun Formation, and Taipinglinchang Formation.
Based on those above research conclusion and the petroleum generating conditions, we consider the organism abundance is high in Sunwu-Jiayin Basin, mixed organic well developed (II type in domain), and they are in low mature to mature phase, so the basin has a good petroleum generating condition, and the reservoirs and cover layers also well matched. The perspected resource extent is counted as 2.1×108t by volume-density method, this means a big resource extent. Yaotun fault concave in Sunwu fault subsidence, Zhanhe syncline in Zhanhe fault subsidence, and Wulaga sag have the big acreage and deep burying, with rich organic matter deposited, have the conditions to form the oil & gas, and they are favorable exploration perspective areas. Encirclements are fault-lithologic, lithologic two types in domain.
引文
[1]陈建渝,牛瑞卿.断陷盆地多次运移成藏的有机地球化学研究[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2000,25(3).
[2]陈建渝,朱芒征.含油气系统与有机地球化学的关系[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(3).
[3]陈丕基,万晓樵,姜剑虹等.富饶阶地表地层剖面[J].地层学杂志,2004,28(2):97-103.
[4]陈丕基.陆相白垩系[C].见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编,中国地层研究二十年(1979-1999).合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2000,329-345.
[5]程克明等.烃源岩地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.
[6]迟元林,云金表,蒙启安,等著.松辽盆地深部结构及成盆动力学与油气聚集.北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[7]戴金星,傅诚德,夏新宇.煤成烃国际学术研讨会论文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000.11.
[8]邓晋福.大陆裂谷岩解剖学作用及深部过程[A].见:池际尚主编,中国东部新生代玄武岩及上地幔研究[C].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988,201-218.
[9]冯子辉,李景坤,李振广.大庆探区煤系烃源岩的生烃条件研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(5).
[10]傅家谟,刘德汉,盛国英.煤成烃地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1990.
[11]高瑞祺,何承泉.乔秀云.松辽盆地两次海侵的沟鞭藻新属种[J].古生物学报,1992,31(1):17-29.
[12]高瑞祺,萧德铭,等.松辽及其外围盆地油气勘探新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:1-229.
[13]郝芳,等.超压盆地生烃作用动力与油气成藏机理[M].科学出版社,2005.
[14]郝芳,陈建渝,等.有机相研究及其在盆地分析中地应用[J].沉积学报,1994,12(4).
[15]郝诒纯,等.中国地层12(中国的白垩系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.
[16]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
[17]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.
[18]黑龙江省区域地层表编写组.东北地区区域地层表,黑龙江省分册[M].北京:地质出版社,1979.
[19]侯读杰,冯子辉,等.松辽盆地石油地球化学研究进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[20]黄第藩,卢双舫.煤成油地球化学研究现状与展望[J].地学前缘,1999,6 (增刊).
[21]黄福堂,阎卫东,等.石油化学[M].石油工业出版社,2000.
[22]李罡,陈丕基,万晓樵,等.嫩江阶底界层型剖面研究[J].地层学杂志,2004,28(4):297-335.
[23]李罡.黑龙江省嘉荫地区晚白垩世太平林场组的俞氏链叶肢介[J].古生物学报,2005,44 (2): 322-324.
[24]李萍.黑龙江沿岸晚白垩世恐龙生物群化石产地的初步预测[J].世界地质,2005,24(2):118-122.
[25]李强,张海桥.杨建国.东北地区侏罗-白垩系界线划分对比问题的讨论[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(4):14-16.
[26]李思田,路凤香,林畅松.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997,1-239.
[27]李贤庆,王铁冠,钟宁宁,等.未熟—低熟烃源岩有机岩石学研究的若干进展[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2000,7(3).
[28]李献华,李武显,陈丕基等.黑龙江富饶组上段凝灰岩的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄:一个最接近白垩系/第三系界线的年龄.科学通报,2004,49(8):816-818.
[29]林畅松,刘景彦,张英志,等.构造活动盆地的层序地层与构造地层分析—以中国中、新生代构造活动湖盆分析为例.地学前缘,2005,12(4):365-374.
[30]林强,葛文春,曹林,等.大兴安岭中生代双峰式火山岩的地球化学特征[J].地球化学,2003,32(3):208-222.
[31]林强、葛文春、孙德有,等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义.地质科学,1998,33(2):129-139.
[32]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用.北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[33]刘招君.湖泊水下扇沉积特征及影响因素,沉积学报,2003,148-154.
[34]龙胜祥,王果寿,等.含油气盆地分析与资源评价[M].地质出版社,1999.
[35]罗小平,单献国,张同周,等.M盆地烃源岩有机显微组分特征与生烃潜力初探[J].西安石油学院学报,1998,13(4).
[36]罗玉兴,张志诚,李蔚荣.黑龙江嘉荫-逊克地区晚中生代和第三纪地层[J].地层学杂志,1983,7(3):169-183.
[37]孟元林,王建国,肖丽华,等.野外露头的盆地模拟研究与地下烃源岩有机质成熟度预测[J].中国海上油气(地质),1996,10(1):13-16.
[38]苗来成,范蔚茗,张福勤,等.小兴安岭西北部新开岭-科洛杂岩锆石SHRIMP年代学研究及其意义. 2003,48(22):2315-2323.
[39]乔秀云,孙跃武,万传彪.孙吴—嘉荫盆地嘉D1井孢粉地层学研究[J].世界地质,2001,24(1):11-16.
[40]谯汉生,牛嘉玉,王明明.中国东部深部层系反向断层遮挡聚油原理与勘探实践.石油勘探与开发,1999,26(6): 10-13.
[41]谯汉生,纪友亮,姜在兴.中国东部大陆裂谷与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[42]邱家骧.应用岩浆岩岩石学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,1-332.
[43]曲关生,等.黑龙江省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.
[44]全成,张林.黑龙江嘉荫地区古近纪早期古气候分析[J].地质论评,2005,51(1):10-15.
[45]全国地层委员会.中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书[M].北京:地质出版社,2001,1-72.
[46]全国地层委员会编著.中国区域年代地层(地质年代)表说明书[M].北京:地质出版社,2002,1-72.
[47]任纪舜,陈延愚,牛宝贵,刘志刚,刘凤仁.中国东部及邻区大陆岩石圈的构造演化[M].北京:科学出版社,1990,217.
[48]任纪舜,王作勋,陈炳蔚,等.从全国看大地构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
[49]邵济安,唐克东,王成源,等.那丹哈达地体的构造特征及演化.中国科学(B辑),1991,7: 744-751.
[50]施行健,周志炎.中国中生代陆相地层[M].北京:科学出版社. 1962,40-60.
[51]水谷申治郎,邵济安,张庆龙.那丹哈达地体与东亚大陆中生代构造的关系[J].地质学报,1989,63: 204-215.
[52]孙革,曹正尧,李浩敏等. 1995.白垩纪植物群[M].见:李星学主编.中国地质时期植物群.广州:广东科学技术出版社. 310-344.
[53]孙革,郭双兴,郑少林,等.世界最早的被子植物化石群的首次发现[J].中国科学(B辑),1992,(5):543-548.
[54]孙革,全成,等.黑龙江嘉荫乌云组地层划分及时代的新认识[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(2):139-142.
[55]孙革,孙春林,董枝明,等.黑龙江嘉荫地区白垩纪-第三纪界线初步观察[J].世界地质,2003,22(1):8-14.
[56]孙革,郑少林.中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(1):60-64.
[57]孙加鹏,邱殿明等.东亚活动大陆边缘松辽盆地与布列亚—结雅盆地主要地质特征的异同.吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35:1-5.
[58]万传彪,刘本培,乔秀云,等.嘉荫盆地太平林场组巴尔姆孢(Balmeisporites)的发现及其意义.地质学报,2004,78(1):1-8.
[59]万传彪,乔秀云,等.中国各时代油气形成母源体探讨[J].世界地质,2004,23(1).
[60]万天丰.中国东部中新生代板内变形构造应力场及其应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1993
[61]汪筱林,刘立,刘招君.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面域中新生代盆地基底结构及构造演化.见:M-SGT地质课题组编.中国满洲里-绥芬河地学断面域内岩石圈结构及其演化的地质研究[C].北京:地震出版社,1994,26-37.
[62]王德滋,周新民,等.中国东南部晚中生代花岗质火山—侵入杂岩成因与地壳演化[M].北京:科学出版社. 2002.
[63]王骏,王东坡,等.东北亚沉积盆地的形成演化及含油气远景[M].北京:地质出版社,1997.
[64]王璞珺,陈树民,刘万洙,等.松辽盆地火山岩相及其与火山岩储层的关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1): 18-30.
[65]王璞珺,王树学,曲永定,等.松辽盆地火山事件研究—营城组火山岩特征[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(专辑):50-54.
[66]王启军,陈建渝,等.油气地球化学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988.
[67]王思恩,等.中国地层11(中国的侏罗系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1985.
[68]王鑫甫,曹流.黑龙江嘉荫晚白垩世渔亮子组孢粉地层研究[J].微体古生物学报,1996,16(2):190-194.
[69]王雪,迟宏一.松辽及外围盆地煤成油的有机地球化学特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(5).
[70]王旖旎.孙吴-嘉荫盆地地层序列及盆地演化[D].长春:吉林大学地球科学学院,2007.
[71]王蓥.大兴安岭侏罗、白垩系研究新进展[J].地层学杂志,1985,9(3):203-209.
[72]王颖,张福勤,张大伟,等.松辽盆地南部变质闪长岩SHRIMP锆石U—Pb年龄及其地质意义.
[73]王友勤,苏养正,刘尔义.东北区区域地层[M],武汉:中国地质大学出版社. 1997.,1-175.
[74]邬立言,顾信章,等.生油岩热解快速定量评价[M].科学出版社,1986.
[75]吴福元,S.WILDE,孙德有.佳木斯地块片麻状花岗岩的锆石离子探针U—Pb年龄.岩石学报,2001,17(3):443-453.
[76]吴福元,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题[J].地学前缘,2003,10(3):51-60.
[77]吴福元,孙德有,李惠民,汪筱林.松辽盆地基底岩石的锆石U-Pb年龄[J].科学通报,2000,45(6):656-660.
[78]吴福元、孙德有、林强.东北花岗岩成因与地壳增生[J].岩石学报,1999,15:181-191.
[79]吴河勇,刘文龙.外围盆地评价优选[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5).
[80]谢鸣谦著.拼贴板块构造及其驱动机理-中国东北及邻区的大地构造演化[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[81]许怀先,陈丽华,万玉金,王大锐.石油地质实验测试技术与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[82]许文良,孙德有,周燕.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面岩浆作用和地壳结构[M].北京:地质出版社,1994,1-94.
[83]许文良,王冬艳,王清海,等.华北克拉通中东部中生代侵入杂岩中角闪石和黑云母的40Ar/39Ar定年:对岩石圈减薄时间的制约[J].地球化学,2004,33(3):221-231.
[84]杨宝俊,张梅生,王璞珺等.中国油气区地质—地球物理解析[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[85]杨继良.大庆探区油气藏勘探的新进展.大庆石油地质与开发,1989,8(3): 19-34.
[86]杨森楠.中、新生代太平洋陆缘带的构造格局和构造转换[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1997,4(3-4):247-255.
[87]云金表,罗笃清等.东北地区中生代断陷盆地群构造演化与成油关系探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(6).
[88]翟光明等.中国石油地质志卷二(大庆油田)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991.
[89]张海桥,付长江,王颖,杨建国,李强.大庆外围盆地侏罗纪—早白垩世早期古气候研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(4):9-11.
[90]张厚福,方朝亮等.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[91]张雷.孙吴-嘉荫盆地白垩系沉积特征与充填序列[D].长春:吉林大学地球科学学院,2007.
[92]张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局[J],辽宁地质,1998.2:91-96.
[93]张弥曼,周家健,刘智成.东北白垩纪含鱼化石层的时代和沉积环境[J],古脊椎动物与古人类,1977,15(3):194-197.
[94]张文昭.稳定东部的潜力分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发[J],1994,13(1).
[95]张永辂,等.古生物命名拉丁语[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.
[96]赵传本,叶得泉,等.中国油气区第三系(Ⅲ)东北油气区分册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[97]赵春荆、彭玉鲸、党增欣,等.吉黑东部构造格架及地壳演化[M].沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,1996.
[98]赵海玲,等.大陆周边扩张型活动带火山岩组合――松辽盆地周边火山岩[J],岩石学报,1997,Vol13. No4.
[99]赵海玲,等.松辽盆地东南缘中生代火山岩及其盆地形成的构造背景[J],地球科学,1996,Vol21. No4.
[100]赵海玲等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩岩石学特征与盆地形成[J],现代地质,1998,Vol12. No1.
[101]郑玉龙,刘文龙,乔秀云.黑龙江孙吴—嘉荫盆地白垩纪孢粉组合及地层划分对比[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(4):342-347.
[102]《中国地层典》编委会.中国地层典(白垩系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.
[103]《中国地层典》编委会.中国地层典(第三系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.
[104]中国地质调查局地层古生物研究中心.中国各地质时代地层划分与对比[M].北京:地质出版社,2005,11.
[105]周世新,王先彬,等.深层油气地球化学研究新进展[J].天然气地球科学.1999,10(6).
[106] Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation [J]. Society of Ecomomic Paleontogogists and Mineralogists Special Publication,1974b,22:1-27.
[107] Dickinson WR., et al. The dynamics of sedimentary basins[J], National Research Council. Washington, D.C,1997.
[108] Emery D and Myers K. Sequence stratigraphy[J]. Blackwell Science,1996.
[109] G.L. Kirillova. Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary basins of active continental margin of Southeast Russia:paleogeography, tectonics, and coal–oil–gas presence[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2003,20 :385-397.
[110] G.L. Kirillova.Cretaceous tectonics and geological environments in East Russia[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 2003, 21: 967-977.
[111] Li J.Y. Permian geodynamic setting of Northeast China and adjacent regions closure of the Paleo-Asian ocean and subduction of the Paleo-pacific plate[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2005. (on line)
[112] Maruyama S., Liou J G., Seno T. Mesozoic and Cenozoic evolution of Asia. In: Ben-Avraham, Z., ed.. The evolution of the Pacific Ocean margins[C]. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press,1989,75-79.
[113] Peter J. Crosdale, Anatoly P. Sorokin , Ken J. Woolfe , David I. M. Macdonald 2002. Inertinite-rich Tertiary coals from the Zeya–Bureya Basin,Far Eastern Russia[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology 51 (2002) 215– 235.
[114] Senger, A. M. C., Natal’in, B. A. Paleotectonics of Asia: fragments of a synthesis. The tectonic evolution of Asia[C]. Yin A. and Harrison M.,(eds). Cambridge University Press. 1996. 486-640.
[115] Sha Jinggen, Masaki Matsukawa, Cai huawei, et al., 2003. The Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous of eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China: stratigraphy and regional basin history[J]. Cretaceous Research, 24: 715-728.
[116] Shanley K W. Alluvial architecture in a sequence stratigraphic framework[J]. Journal of Geology,1994,102 (2): 105-109.
[117] Zhao G. C.. Paleoproterozoic assemblage of the North China Craton[J]. Geological Magazine, 2001, 138: 89-91. 1.成都理工大学.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选.2003. 2.大庆石油管理局勘探部.黑龙江省孙吴-龙镇、逊克县南部地区重力测量成果报告.1991 . 3.大庆石油管理局勘探部.孙吴-嘉荫盆地东部地区重磁力详查工程勘探成果报告.2003. 4.大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院.外围盆地侏罗系划分与对比(Q/DYY4.1-1-99).1999. 5.大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院。汤原断陷烃源岩生烃潜力研究.1994. 6.大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院.外围盆地评价优选及勘探部署研究(Q/DYY KY 1.6-1-2003).2003. 7.东北石油地质局.松辽盆地外围主要含油气盆地油气远景分析.1997. 8.黑龙江省地质局.区域地质调查报告(太平沟公社幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅩⅤ).1979. 9.黑龙江省地质局.区域地质调查报告(逊克县幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅠ;富饶公社幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅧ:新兴公社幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅦ: M-52-ⅩⅩⅧ白桦林场幅).1981. 10.黑龙江省地质矿产局.区域地质调查报告(辰清公社幅L-52-(26).1984. 11.黑龙江省地质矿产局.区域地质调查报告(黑河市幅M-52-(14);孙吴县幅M-52-(20).1989. 12.吉林大学地球科学学院.大庆探
区外围盆地中、新生代地层划分、对比与分布规律(专题编号:XQ-2004-07-02).2007. 13.吉林大学地球科学学院.东北地区中、新生代区域地层格架研究(专题编号:XQ-2004-07-03).2007. 14.李忠权,等.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选.成都理工大学,2003. 15.田军.孙吴-嘉荫盆地地震资料解释成果(物探公司内部资料).2005. 16.万传彪.东部盆地群中新生代地层划分与对比研究(内部资料).2001. 17.王永春.含油气系统与油气成藏石油工业出版社(内部资料).2001. 18.中国地质调查局.中华人民共和国区域地质调查报告(乌云镇幅M52C003003嘉荫县幅M52C004003太平沟幅M52C004004).2006.
[2]陈建渝,朱芒征.含油气系统与有机地球化学的关系[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(3).
[3]陈丕基,万晓樵,姜剑虹等.富饶阶地表地层剖面[J].地层学杂志,2004,28(2):97-103.
[4]陈丕基.陆相白垩系[C].见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编,中国地层研究二十年(1979-1999).合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2000,329-345.
[5]程克明等.烃源岩地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.
[6]迟元林,云金表,蒙启安,等著.松辽盆地深部结构及成盆动力学与油气聚集.北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[7]戴金星,傅诚德,夏新宇.煤成烃国际学术研讨会论文集[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000.11.
[8]邓晋福.大陆裂谷岩解剖学作用及深部过程[A].见:池际尚主编,中国东部新生代玄武岩及上地幔研究[C].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988,201-218.
[9]冯子辉,李景坤,李振广.大庆探区煤系烃源岩的生烃条件研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(5).
[10]傅家谟,刘德汉,盛国英.煤成烃地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1990.
[11]高瑞祺,何承泉.乔秀云.松辽盆地两次海侵的沟鞭藻新属种[J].古生物学报,1992,31(1):17-29.
[12]高瑞祺,萧德铭,等.松辽及其外围盆地油气勘探新进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995:1-229.
[13]郝芳,等.超压盆地生烃作用动力与油气成藏机理[M].科学出版社,2005.
[14]郝芳,陈建渝,等.有机相研究及其在盆地分析中地应用[J].沉积学报,1994,12(4).
[15]郝诒纯,等.中国地层12(中国的白垩系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.
[16]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
[17]黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.
[18]黑龙江省区域地层表编写组.东北地区区域地层表,黑龙江省分册[M].北京:地质出版社,1979.
[19]侯读杰,冯子辉,等.松辽盆地石油地球化学研究进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[20]黄第藩,卢双舫.煤成油地球化学研究现状与展望[J].地学前缘,1999,6 (增刊).
[21]黄福堂,阎卫东,等.石油化学[M].石油工业出版社,2000.
[22]李罡,陈丕基,万晓樵,等.嫩江阶底界层型剖面研究[J].地层学杂志,2004,28(4):297-335.
[23]李罡.黑龙江省嘉荫地区晚白垩世太平林场组的俞氏链叶肢介[J].古生物学报,2005,44 (2): 322-324.
[24]李萍.黑龙江沿岸晚白垩世恐龙生物群化石产地的初步预测[J].世界地质,2005,24(2):118-122.
[25]李强,张海桥.杨建国.东北地区侏罗-白垩系界线划分对比问题的讨论[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(4):14-16.
[26]李思田,路凤香,林畅松.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997,1-239.
[27]李贤庆,王铁冠,钟宁宁,等.未熟—低熟烃源岩有机岩石学研究的若干进展[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2000,7(3).
[28]李献华,李武显,陈丕基等.黑龙江富饶组上段凝灰岩的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄:一个最接近白垩系/第三系界线的年龄.科学通报,2004,49(8):816-818.
[29]林畅松,刘景彦,张英志,等.构造活动盆地的层序地层与构造地层分析—以中国中、新生代构造活动湖盆分析为例.地学前缘,2005,12(4):365-374.
[30]林强,葛文春,曹林,等.大兴安岭中生代双峰式火山岩的地球化学特征[J].地球化学,2003,32(3):208-222.
[31]林强、葛文春、孙德有,等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义.地质科学,1998,33(2):129-139.
[32]刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏,等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用.北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[33]刘招君.湖泊水下扇沉积特征及影响因素,沉积学报,2003,148-154.
[34]龙胜祥,王果寿,等.含油气盆地分析与资源评价[M].地质出版社,1999.
[35]罗小平,单献国,张同周,等.M盆地烃源岩有机显微组分特征与生烃潜力初探[J].西安石油学院学报,1998,13(4).
[36]罗玉兴,张志诚,李蔚荣.黑龙江嘉荫-逊克地区晚中生代和第三纪地层[J].地层学杂志,1983,7(3):169-183.
[37]孟元林,王建国,肖丽华,等.野外露头的盆地模拟研究与地下烃源岩有机质成熟度预测[J].中国海上油气(地质),1996,10(1):13-16.
[38]苗来成,范蔚茗,张福勤,等.小兴安岭西北部新开岭-科洛杂岩锆石SHRIMP年代学研究及其意义. 2003,48(22):2315-2323.
[39]乔秀云,孙跃武,万传彪.孙吴—嘉荫盆地嘉D1井孢粉地层学研究[J].世界地质,2001,24(1):11-16.
[40]谯汉生,牛嘉玉,王明明.中国东部深部层系反向断层遮挡聚油原理与勘探实践.石油勘探与开发,1999,26(6): 10-13.
[41]谯汉生,纪友亮,姜在兴.中国东部大陆裂谷与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[42]邱家骧.应用岩浆岩岩石学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,1-332.
[43]曲关生,等.黑龙江省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.
[44]全成,张林.黑龙江嘉荫地区古近纪早期古气候分析[J].地质论评,2005,51(1):10-15.
[45]全国地层委员会.中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书[M].北京:地质出版社,2001,1-72.
[46]全国地层委员会编著.中国区域年代地层(地质年代)表说明书[M].北京:地质出版社,2002,1-72.
[47]任纪舜,陈延愚,牛宝贵,刘志刚,刘凤仁.中国东部及邻区大陆岩石圈的构造演化[M].北京:科学出版社,1990,217.
[48]任纪舜,王作勋,陈炳蔚,等.从全国看大地构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
[49]邵济安,唐克东,王成源,等.那丹哈达地体的构造特征及演化.中国科学(B辑),1991,7: 744-751.
[50]施行健,周志炎.中国中生代陆相地层[M].北京:科学出版社. 1962,40-60.
[51]水谷申治郎,邵济安,张庆龙.那丹哈达地体与东亚大陆中生代构造的关系[J].地质学报,1989,63: 204-215.
[52]孙革,曹正尧,李浩敏等. 1995.白垩纪植物群[M].见:李星学主编.中国地质时期植物群.广州:广东科学技术出版社. 310-344.
[53]孙革,郭双兴,郑少林,等.世界最早的被子植物化石群的首次发现[J].中国科学(B辑),1992,(5):543-548.
[54]孙革,全成,等.黑龙江嘉荫乌云组地层划分及时代的新认识[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(2):139-142.
[55]孙革,孙春林,董枝明,等.黑龙江嘉荫地区白垩纪-第三纪界线初步观察[J].世界地质,2003,22(1):8-14.
[56]孙革,郑少林.中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(1):60-64.
[57]孙加鹏,邱殿明等.东亚活动大陆边缘松辽盆地与布列亚—结雅盆地主要地质特征的异同.吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35:1-5.
[58]万传彪,刘本培,乔秀云,等.嘉荫盆地太平林场组巴尔姆孢(Balmeisporites)的发现及其意义.地质学报,2004,78(1):1-8.
[59]万传彪,乔秀云,等.中国各时代油气形成母源体探讨[J].世界地质,2004,23(1).
[60]万天丰.中国东部中新生代板内变形构造应力场及其应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1993
[61]汪筱林,刘立,刘招君.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面域中新生代盆地基底结构及构造演化.见:M-SGT地质课题组编.中国满洲里-绥芬河地学断面域内岩石圈结构及其演化的地质研究[C].北京:地震出版社,1994,26-37.
[62]王德滋,周新民,等.中国东南部晚中生代花岗质火山—侵入杂岩成因与地壳演化[M].北京:科学出版社. 2002.
[63]王骏,王东坡,等.东北亚沉积盆地的形成演化及含油气远景[M].北京:地质出版社,1997.
[64]王璞珺,陈树民,刘万洙,等.松辽盆地火山岩相及其与火山岩储层的关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(1): 18-30.
[65]王璞珺,王树学,曲永定,等.松辽盆地火山事件研究—营城组火山岩特征[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(专辑):50-54.
[66]王启军,陈建渝,等.油气地球化学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988.
[67]王思恩,等.中国地层11(中国的侏罗系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1985.
[68]王鑫甫,曹流.黑龙江嘉荫晚白垩世渔亮子组孢粉地层研究[J].微体古生物学报,1996,16(2):190-194.
[69]王雪,迟宏一.松辽及外围盆地煤成油的有机地球化学特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2001,20(5).
[70]王旖旎.孙吴-嘉荫盆地地层序列及盆地演化[D].长春:吉林大学地球科学学院,2007.
[71]王蓥.大兴安岭侏罗、白垩系研究新进展[J].地层学杂志,1985,9(3):203-209.
[72]王颖,张福勤,张大伟,等.松辽盆地南部变质闪长岩SHRIMP锆石U—Pb年龄及其地质意义.
[73]王友勤,苏养正,刘尔义.东北区区域地层[M],武汉:中国地质大学出版社. 1997.,1-175.
[74]邬立言,顾信章,等.生油岩热解快速定量评价[M].科学出版社,1986.
[75]吴福元,S.WILDE,孙德有.佳木斯地块片麻状花岗岩的锆石离子探针U—Pb年龄.岩石学报,2001,17(3):443-453.
[76]吴福元,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题[J].地学前缘,2003,10(3):51-60.
[77]吴福元,孙德有,李惠民,汪筱林.松辽盆地基底岩石的锆石U-Pb年龄[J].科学通报,2000,45(6):656-660.
[78]吴福元、孙德有、林强.东北花岗岩成因与地壳增生[J].岩石学报,1999,15:181-191.
[79]吴河勇,刘文龙.外围盆地评价优选[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5).
[80]谢鸣谦著.拼贴板块构造及其驱动机理-中国东北及邻区的大地构造演化[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[81]许怀先,陈丽华,万玉金,王大锐.石油地质实验测试技术与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[82]许文良,孙德有,周燕.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面岩浆作用和地壳结构[M].北京:地质出版社,1994,1-94.
[83]许文良,王冬艳,王清海,等.华北克拉通中东部中生代侵入杂岩中角闪石和黑云母的40Ar/39Ar定年:对岩石圈减薄时间的制约[J].地球化学,2004,33(3):221-231.
[84]杨宝俊,张梅生,王璞珺等.中国油气区地质—地球物理解析[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[85]杨继良.大庆探区油气藏勘探的新进展.大庆石油地质与开发,1989,8(3): 19-34.
[86]杨森楠.中、新生代太平洋陆缘带的构造格局和构造转换[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1997,4(3-4):247-255.
[87]云金表,罗笃清等.东北地区中生代断陷盆地群构造演化与成油关系探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(6).
[88]翟光明等.中国石油地质志卷二(大庆油田)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1991.
[89]张海桥,付长江,王颖,杨建国,李强.大庆外围盆地侏罗纪—早白垩世早期古气候研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(4):9-11.
[90]张厚福,方朝亮等.石油地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[91]张雷.孙吴-嘉荫盆地白垩系沉积特征与充填序列[D].长春:吉林大学地球科学学院,2007.
[92]张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局[J],辽宁地质,1998.2:91-96.
[93]张弥曼,周家健,刘智成.东北白垩纪含鱼化石层的时代和沉积环境[J],古脊椎动物与古人类,1977,15(3):194-197.
[94]张文昭.稳定东部的潜力分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发[J],1994,13(1).
[95]张永辂,等.古生物命名拉丁语[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.
[96]赵传本,叶得泉,等.中国油气区第三系(Ⅲ)东北油气区分册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994.
[97]赵春荆、彭玉鲸、党增欣,等.吉黑东部构造格架及地壳演化[M].沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,1996.
[98]赵海玲,等.大陆周边扩张型活动带火山岩组合――松辽盆地周边火山岩[J],岩石学报,1997,Vol13. No4.
[99]赵海玲,等.松辽盆地东南缘中生代火山岩及其盆地形成的构造背景[J],地球科学,1996,Vol21. No4.
[100]赵海玲等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩岩石学特征与盆地形成[J],现代地质,1998,Vol12. No1.
[101]郑玉龙,刘文龙,乔秀云.黑龙江孙吴—嘉荫盆地白垩纪孢粉组合及地层划分对比[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(4):342-347.
[102]《中国地层典》编委会.中国地层典(白垩系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.
[103]《中国地层典》编委会.中国地层典(第三系)[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.
[104]中国地质调查局地层古生物研究中心.中国各地质时代地层划分与对比[M].北京:地质出版社,2005,11.
[105]周世新,王先彬,等.深层油气地球化学研究新进展[J].天然气地球科学.1999,10(6).
[106] Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation [J]. Society of Ecomomic Paleontogogists and Mineralogists Special Publication,1974b,22:1-27.
[107] Dickinson WR., et al. The dynamics of sedimentary basins[J], National Research Council. Washington, D.C,1997.
[108] Emery D and Myers K. Sequence stratigraphy[J]. Blackwell Science,1996.
[109] G.L. Kirillova. Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary basins of active continental margin of Southeast Russia:paleogeography, tectonics, and coal–oil–gas presence[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2003,20 :385-397.
[110] G.L. Kirillova.Cretaceous tectonics and geological environments in East Russia[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 2003, 21: 967-977.
[111] Li J.Y. Permian geodynamic setting of Northeast China and adjacent regions closure of the Paleo-Asian ocean and subduction of the Paleo-pacific plate[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2005. (on line)
[112] Maruyama S., Liou J G., Seno T. Mesozoic and Cenozoic evolution of Asia. In: Ben-Avraham, Z., ed.. The evolution of the Pacific Ocean margins[C]. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press,1989,75-79.
[113] Peter J. Crosdale, Anatoly P. Sorokin , Ken J. Woolfe , David I. M. Macdonald 2002. Inertinite-rich Tertiary coals from the Zeya–Bureya Basin,Far Eastern Russia[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology 51 (2002) 215– 235.
[114] Senger, A. M. C., Natal’in, B. A. Paleotectonics of Asia: fragments of a synthesis. The tectonic evolution of Asia[C]. Yin A. and Harrison M.,(eds). Cambridge University Press. 1996. 486-640.
[115] Sha Jinggen, Masaki Matsukawa, Cai huawei, et al., 2003. The Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous of eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China: stratigraphy and regional basin history[J]. Cretaceous Research, 24: 715-728.
[116] Shanley K W. Alluvial architecture in a sequence stratigraphic framework[J]. Journal of Geology,1994,102 (2): 105-109.
[117] Zhao G. C.. Paleoproterozoic assemblage of the North China Craton[J]. Geological Magazine, 2001, 138: 89-91. 1.成都理工大学.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选.2003. 2.大庆石油管理局勘探部.黑龙江省孙吴-龙镇、逊克县南部地区重力测量成果报告.1991 . 3.大庆石油管理局勘探部.孙吴-嘉荫盆地东部地区重磁力详查工程勘探成果报告.2003. 4.大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院.外围盆地侏罗系划分与对比(Q/DYY4.1-1-99).1999. 5.大庆石油管理局勘探开发研究院。汤原断陷烃源岩生烃潜力研究.1994. 6.大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院.外围盆地评价优选及勘探部署研究(Q/DYY KY 1.6-1-2003).2003. 7.东北石油地质局.松辽盆地外围主要含油气盆地油气远景分析.1997. 8.黑龙江省地质局.区域地质调查报告(太平沟公社幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅩⅤ).1979. 9.黑龙江省地质局.区域地质调查报告(逊克县幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅠ;富饶公社幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅧ:新兴公社幅M-52-ⅩⅩⅦ: M-52-ⅩⅩⅧ白桦林场幅).1981. 10.黑龙江省地质矿产局.区域地质调查报告(辰清公社幅L-52-(26).1984. 11.黑龙江省地质矿产局.区域地质调查报告(黑河市幅M-52-(14);孙吴县幅M-52-(20).1989. 12.吉林大学地球科学学院.大庆探
区外围盆地中、新生代地层划分、对比与分布规律(专题编号:XQ-2004-07-02).2007. 13.吉林大学地球科学学院.东北地区中、新生代区域地层格架研究(专题编号:XQ-2004-07-03).2007. 14.李忠权,等.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选.成都理工大学,2003. 15.田军.孙吴-嘉荫盆地地震资料解释成果(物探公司内部资料).2005. 16.万传彪.东部盆地群中新生代地层划分与对比研究(内部资料).2001. 17.王永春.含油气系统与油气成藏石油工业出版社(内部资料).2001. 18.中国地质调查局.中华人民共和国区域地质调查报告(乌云镇幅M52C003003嘉荫县幅M52C004003太平沟幅M52C004004).2006.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |