用户名: 密码: 验证码:
几种禾草种子显微结构研究与半透层定位
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
种子半透层是指种子覆盖物中存在具半透性的某层组织,它允许种子内外气体和水分的自由出入,而阻止其他物质的交换。目前,禾草种子半透层的研究是以往关注不够的领域。本文以苏丹草(Sorghum sudanense)老芒麦(Elymus sibiricus)和高羊茅(Festuca arundinacea)3种禾草种子为材料,通过硝酸镧示踪、透射电镜观测和能量色散X射线光谱仪分析(EDX)等技术,研究了3种禾草种子的显微结构、半透层及其位置,并研究了不同发育期苏丹草种子的光镜显微结构和透性变化,主要结论如下:
     1供试3种禾草的种子生活力与电导率测定结果呈不同响应趋势。苏丹草和老芒麦种子的生活力与电导率不相关(P>0.05),不同质量种子的水浸液电导率值变化较小;而高羊茅种子的生活力与水浸电导率呈极显著正相关(P<0.01)。
     2对3种种子光镜下的基本结构观测表明,种皮及临近胚乳的结构有一定差异。苏丹草和老芒麦的种皮结构致密,具栅栏组织等特化结构;且苏丹草糊粉层和淀粉细胞之间存在2-3层未分化细胞。而高羊茅种子种皮及糊粉层结构疏松,无栅栏组织。
     3通过电镜和EDX对3种种子种皮的镧通透性的研究表明:苏丹草具有胚乳半透层,该半透层位于糊粉层内侧细胞膜,紧靠未分化细胞;老芒麦具有种皮半透层,且位于种皮最内侧,紧靠栅栏组织;高羊茅种皮及胚乳对镧元素通透性较好,不存在种子半透层。
     4镧在老化苏丹草种子内的渗入程度较未老化稍深,但均未进入苏丹草的未分化细胞。表明老化对苏丹草种子的糊粉层膜系统有一定损伤,但未伤及半透层。
     5对不同发育期苏丹草种子的结构和透性研究表明,随种子成熟度增加,种子千粒重和发芽率逐渐增加,吸水率和电导率逐渐降低,至盛花期后25 d达到生理成熟。盛花期后16 d,糊粉层内侧的未分化细胞层出现,种子的电导率与吸水率均已达到较低水平,与25 d生理成熟的种子差异不显著。再次证明种子半透层是在种子成熟过程中逐渐发育形成的。电导率不能评价苏丹草种子活力,但可以反映种子的成熟度。
Seed semi-permeable layer may be defined as the layer of seed coverings to allow water and gas exchange while solution is restricted or prevented.The research of semi-permeable layer in grass seed is a field which has been paid rare attention previously. Microstructure,semi-permeable layer and it's location of seeds in 3 grass species,namely Sorghum sudanense,Elymus sibiricus and Festuca arundinacea were studied using the techniques of lanthanum tracer,transmission electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray analysis(EDX).The microstructure of and permeability changes of S.sudanense during seed development were also studied.The main results obtained were as follows:
     1 The correlations between seed viability and seed leakage of electrical conductivity (EC)were not relevant(P>0.05)and the EC values were very low for both S.sudanense and E.sibiricus.However significant positive correlation(P<0.01)presented between viability and EC value in seeds of F.arundinacea.
     2 The basic structures,under light microscope observation were different between species at seed envelop and endosperm nearby.The epidermis was compact in S. sudanense and E.sibiricus with specialized structure palisade tissues.And 2-3 layers of undifferentiated cells existed between aleurone layer and starch cells in S.sudanense seed. But for F.arundinacea seed,the structure of epidermis and aleurone layer was loose,and palisade tissues and undifferentiated cells did not presented.
     3 The variations between 3 grass species in seed coat permeability were observed through the detection using lanthanum tracer,electron microscope and EDX.An endosperm semi-permeable layer was found in S.sudanense which located at the innermost of the aleurone layer,close to undifferentiated cells.A seed coat Semi-permeable layer presented in E.sibiricus which lied at the inside of the seed coat, just next to palisade tissues.But no semi-permeable layer was observed in seed coat and endosperm in F.arundinacea.
     4 Diffusion of La to seed was deeper in aged than unaged seeds in S.sudanense.But La did not diffuse through the undifferentiated cells in both aged and unaged seeds.This indicated that ageing slightly damaged aleurone layer membrane,but did not damage the semi-permeable layer.
     5 As S.sudanense seed developed,the grain weight and seed germination rate increased,but the EC value and imbibition rate decreased gradually.Seed reached physiological maturity at 25d after full-bloom(AFB).Undifferentiated cells emergenced at 16d AFB.The EC value and imbibition rate had decreased to a lower level,with no significant difference with that of 25d of AFB.The results further proved that seed semi-permeable layer gradually formed during seed maturation.The EC test is not able to detect seed lot deterioration,but it can reflect the degree of seed maturation.
引文
[1]Chapman GP,Peat WE著,王彦荣译.禾本科植物导论.北京:科学出版社,1996.
    [2]陈学林,景国海,郭辉.青藏高原东缘高寒草甸19种马先蒿属植物种皮纹饰特征及其生物学意义.草业学报,2007,16(2):60-68.
    [3]陈志宏,韩建国,秦歌菊,等.冰草种子发育过程中活力变化的研究.草业学报,2004,13(2):94-98.
    [4]Fahn著,吴树明,刘德议译.植物解剖学.天津:南开大学出版社,1990.
    [5]郭树栋.几种多年生禾草在高寒地区的引种栽培试验.草业与畜牧,2006(10),13-15.
    [6]韩建国,毛培胜,牛忠联,等.老芒麦种子发育过程中的生理生化变化.草地学报,2000,8(4):237-244.
    [7]韩建国,毛培胜.草坪型高羊茅种子活力的研究.草地学报,1995,3(4):269-275.
    [8]李玉荣,韩建国,孙彦,等.蓝茎冰草种子劣变过程中生理生化变化.种子,2007,26(2):10-13.
    [9]李玉荣,韩建国,孙彦,等.新麦草种子劣变过程中生理生化变化.草地学报,2005,13(3):180-189.
    [10]李毓堂.略论推行草地长期有偿家庭承包制的迫切性.中国草地,1993,(3):67-69.
    [11]李正理,张新英.植物解剖学.北京:高等教育出版社,1983.
    [12]刘公社,张卫东.禾本科牧草分子生物学及生物技术研究进展,西北植物学报,2003,23(4):682-687.
    [13]刘志敏,沈美娟.蔬菜种子活力的研究.长江蔬菜,1989,2:9-10.
    [14]陆江阳,梁延杰,李玲,等.大鼠多器官衰竭前期各脏器硝酸镧示踪电镜观察.中华物理医学杂志,1995,17(1):35-37.
    [15]农业大词典编辑委员会.农业大词典.北京:中国农业出版社.1998.
    [16]浦心春,韩建国.高羊茅种子生活力丧失过程中遗传物质的降解.草地学报,1996,4(3):180-185.
    [17]强科斌,郭敏,张晓庆,等.圆囊苔草叶片的形态解剖学研究.草业学报,2007,16(2):76-83.
    [18]乔安海.青藏高原东部地区垂穗披碱草种子生产技术研究[硕士学位论文].北京:中国农业大学,2005.
    [19]任继周.草业锁谈之二-草类植物.草业科学.2003,20(5):30-31.
    [20]阮素云,顾祖维,马国云,等.用EDX能谱分析研究人参皂甙和维生素C保护铅对血脑屏障损害的作用.中国公共卫生,1998,14(9):552-554.
    [21]王柳英,周青平,颜红波,等.多年生禾本科牧草栽培比较试验.草业科学,2005(4):20-23.
    [22]王俭珍.水肥耦合对6种禾本科牧草种子产量和生产性能的效应[硕士学位论文].北京:中国农业大学,2005.
    [23]王彦荣,沈益新,刘友良.牧草种子活力检测技术述评.草业学报,2001,10(1):48-57.
    [24]王彦荣,余玲,刘友良,等.数种牧草种子劣变的生活力与膜透性的关系.草地学报,2002, 11(3):85-91.
    [25]王彦荣,余玲,刘友良,等.用活力指标评价几种牧草的种批质量和田间出苗率.草业学报,2003,12(5):62-69.
    [26]王彦荣.牧草种子劣变的膜损伤及其检测与调控[博士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学,2003.
    [27]王英姿,侯宪钦.带能谱分析的扫描电子显微镜在材料分析中的应用.工艺与检测,2007,(9)-80-83.
    [28]徐本美,顾增辉,郑光华.测定种子方法的探讨(1)TIC法.种子,1982,(2):12-14.
    [29]徐本美,顾增辉.种子活力的研究.种子,1989,5:53-55.
    [30]徐荣,韩建国.草坪型高羊毛茅种子成熟过程中活力变化及适宜收获期研究.中国农业科学,2003,36(7):834-839
    [31]杨泽新,唐成斌,刘世凡,等.贵州天然禾本科牧草种质资源研究.草业科学,1996,13(1):11-15.
    [32]易津,曹自成,李青丰,等.豆科、禾本科牧草种子活力测定中的问题及测定方法.中国草地,1994,3:42-44.
    [33]于卓,孙样,张红蕾,等.柠条、花棒种子活力研究初报.中国草地,1990,(62):65-68.
    [34]张东生,洪大蓉.镧示踪技术在高能震波对细胞膜通透性影响的应用研究.南京医科大学学报(中文版),1997,17(4):390-392.
    [35]张文明,郑文寅,姚大年,等.草坪草种子活力测定方法的比较研究.草原与草坪,2004,3:48-51.
    [36]张文明,朱国富.籽粒性状对油菜种子活力的影响.种子,1999,3:28-29,32.
    [37]张艳红,国振杰,易津.6种根茎禾草种子发育过程中内源激素变化规律的研究.种子,2007,26(8):8-12.
    [38]郑殿生,盛锦山.主要作物远缘杂交概况.作物遗传资源科学,2002,3(1):55-60.
    [39]郑国铝,谷祝平.生物显微技术.北京:人民教育出版社,1993,284-326.
    [40]中国农业百科全书总编辑委员会畜牧业卷编辑委员会,中国农业百科全书编辑部.中国农业百科全书.北京:中国农业出版社,1996.
    [41]Beresniewicz MM,Taylor AG,Goffinet MC,et al.Chemical nature of a semipermeable layer in seed coats of leek,onion(Liliaceae),tomato and pepper(Solanaceae).Seed Science and Technology,1995b,23:135-145.
    [42]Beresniewicz MM,Taylor AG,Goffinet MC,et al.Characterization and location of a semipermeable layer in seed coats of leek and onion(Liliaceae),tomato and pepper(Solanaceae).Seed Science and Technology,1995a,23:123-134.
    [43]Blakely ME,Rooney LW,Sullins RD,et al.Microscopy of the pericarp and the testa of different genotypes of sorghum.Crop Science,1979,19:837-842.
    [44]Bradbury D,Macmasters MM,Cull JM.Structure of mature wheat kornel:Ⅱ Microscopic structure of pericarp,seed coat,and other coverings of the endosperm and germ of hard red winter wheat.Cereal Chemistry,1956,33:342-360.
    [45]Bradford KJ.Water stress and the water relations of seed development:a critical review.Crop Science,1994,34:1-11.
    [46]Briggs CL,Morris EC,Ashford AE.Investigations into seed dormancy in Grevillea linearifolia,G.buxifolia and G.sericea:anatomy and histochemistry of the seed coat.Annals of Botany,2005,96(6):965-980.
    [47]Briggs CL,Morris EC.Seed-coat dormancy in Grevillea linearifolia:little change in permeability to an apoplastic tracer after treatment with smoke and heat.Annals of Botany,2008,101(5):623-632.
    [48]Brown AJ.On the existence of a semi-permeable membrane enclosing the seeds of some of the Gramineae.Annals of Botany,1907,ⅩⅪ:79-87.
    [49]Brown R.An experimental study of the permeability to gases of the seed-coat membranes of Cucurbita Pepo.Annals of Botany,1940,4:379-395.
    [50]Ching TM,Schoo lcrafl I.Physiological and chemical differences in aged seed.Crop Science,1968,8:407-409.
    [51]Collins EJ.The structure of the integumentary system of the barley grain in relation to localized water absorption and semipermeability.Annals of Botany,1918,32:381-414.
    [52]Cookson WR,Rowarth JS,Sedcole JR.Seed vigour in perennial ryegrass(Lolium perenne L.):effect and cause.Seed Science and Technology,2001,29:255-270.
    [53]Earp CF,Rooney LW.Scanning electron microscopy of the pericarp and testa of several sorghum varieties.Food Microstructure,1982,1:125-134.
    [54]Edelstein M,Kigel J.Seed germination of melon(Cucumis melo)at sub-and supra-optimal temperatures.Scientia Horticulturae,1990,45:55-63.
    [55]Edelstein M,Yossi BT,Kigel J,et al.Role of endogenous gibberellins in germination of melon (Cucumis melo)seeds.Physiologia Plantarum,1995,95(1):113-119.
    [56]Egerton-Warburton L.A smoke-induced alteration of the sub-testa cuticle in seeds of the post-fire recruiter,Emmenanthe penduliflora Benth.(Hydrophyllaceae).Journal of Experimental Botany,1998,49:1317-1327.
    [57]Gahan PB.Plant Histochemistry and Cytochemistry.An Introduction.London:Academic Press,1984,301.
    [58]Hall RD,Wiesner L E.Relationship between seed vigor tests and field performance of 'Regar'meadow bromegrass.Crop Science,1990,30:967-970.
    [59]Hampton JG,TeKrony DM.Handbook of Vigour Test Methods,3rd Edition.ISTA,Zurich,Switzerland,1995,22-34.
    [60]Harrington GT,Crocker W.Structure,physical characteristics,and composition of the pericarp and integument of Johnson grass seed in relation to its physiology.Journal of Agricultural Research,1923,23:193-222.
    [61]Hill HJ,Taylor AG.Relationship between viability,endosperm integrity and imbibed lettuce seed density and leakage.Hortscience,1997,24:814-816.
    [62]Jacobsen JS,Fisher DG,Maretzki A,Moore PH.Anatomy of sugarcane stem in relation to phloem unloading and sucrose storage.BotanicaActa,1992,18:959-969.
    [63]Jensen WA.Botanical Histochemistry.Principles and Practice.San Francisco:W.H.Freeman and Company,1962,480.
    [64]Johann H.Origin of the suberized semipermeable membrane in the caryopsis of maize.Journal of Agricultural Research,1942,64:275-281.
    [65]Kalpana R,Madhava Rao KV.On the aging mechanism in pigeonpea(Cajanus cajan(L)Millsp.)seeds.Seed Science and Technology,1995,23:1-9.
    [66]Kolattukudy P.Structure,biosynthesis and biodegradation of cutin and suberin.Annual Review of Plant Physiology,1981,32:539-567.
    [67]Kolattukudy PE.Biopolyester membranes of plants:cutin and suberin.Science,1980,208(4447):990-1000.
    [68]Kotowski F.Semipermeability of seed coverings and stimulation of seeds.Plant Physiology,1927,2:177-186.
    [69]Marshall AH,Naylor REL.Seed vigour and field establishment in Italian ryegrass(Lolium multiflorum L.).Seed Science and Technology,1985,13:781-794.
    [70]Matthews S,Bradnock WT.Relationship between seed exudation and field emergence in peas and French beans.Horticultural Research,1967,8:89-93.
    [71]McDonald MB.Seed deterioration:physiology,repair and assesment.Seed Science and Technology,1999,27:177-237.
    [72]Obroucheva NV.Seed germination:a guide to the early stages.The Netherlans:Backhuys Publishers Leiden,1999,37-75.
    [73]Ramakrishna P,Amritphale D.The perisperm-endosperm envelope in Cucumis:structure,proton diffusion and cell wall hydrolysing activity.Annals of Botany,2005,96(5):769-78.
    [74]Rooney LW,Miller FR.Variation in the structure and kernel characteristics of sorghum.India:International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.antifungal proteins.Andhra Pradesh.Plant Breeding Review,1982,14:39-85.
    [75]Shull CA.Semipermeability of the seed coat.Contributions from the Hull botanical laboratory.Botanical Gazette,1913,56:169-199.
    [76]Speer HL,Hsiao AI.Some physical and chemical properties of the lettuce seed endosperm.Canadian Journal of Botany,1976,54:15i5-1522.
    [77]Tang S,Tekrony DM,Egli DB,et al.Survival characteristics of com seed during storage.Crop Science,1999,39:1400-1406.
    [78]Thornton ML.Seed dormancy in watermelon Citrullus vulgaris Shrad.Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts,1968,58:80-84.
    [79]Tyagi A,Santha IM,Mehta SL.Regulation of hordein synthesis in barley high lysine mutant Notch-2.Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics,1992,29(1):93-96.
    [80]Vaughn SF,Lulai EC.Suberin stains comparison of fluorescent stains for the detection of suberin in potato periderm.American Potato Journal,1991,68:667-674.
    [81]Wang YR,Hampton JG.Seed vigour and storage in 'Grassland Paw era' red clover.Plant Varieties and Seeds,1991,4:61-66.
    [82]Wang YR,Yu L,Nan ZB,et al.Vigor tests used to rank seed lot quality and predict field emergence in four forage species.Crop Science,2004,44:535-541.
    [83]Welbaum GE,Bradford KJ.Water relations of seed development and germination in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.)Ⅳ.Characteristics of the perisperm during seed development.Plant Physiology,1990,92:1038-1045.
    [84]Welbaum GE,Meinzer FC,Grayson RL,Thornham KD.Evidence for and consequences of a barrier to solute diffusion between the apoplast and vascular bundles in sugarcane stalk tissue.Australian Journal of Plant Physiology,1992,19:611-623.
    [85]Yim KO,Bradford KJ.Callose deposition is responsible for apoplastic semipermeability of the endosperm envelope of muskmelon seeds.Plant Physiology,1998,118(1).83-90.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700