用户名: 密码: 验证码:
廊固凹陷古近纪大兴砾岩体沉积特征及成因
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
大兴砾岩位于渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷西部大兴断层下降盘,其与大套成熟烃源岩相接触或为后者所包围,有着巨大的资源潜力。综合地震、测井、岩心、薄片等资料,对大兴砾岩的古地质背景、成因类型及其沉积特征进行了研究。大兴砾岩主要发育于盆地强烈断陷期,构造演化和断层活动对大兴砾岩的形成和分布具有明显的控制作用,前古近纪构造控制物源类型,古近纪构造控制了砾岩体的分布层系,大兴断层的幕式活动及迁移特征控制了砾岩体类型及演化。沙三下亚段沉积之前,大兴凸起上主要发育蓟县系白云岩、寒武系-奥陶系灰岩地层,局部发育中生界碎屑岩地层;沙三下亚段沉积之后,大兴凸起之上发育的地层主要为蓟县系白云岩和寒武系灰岩地层,奥陶系灰岩分布范围减小;沙三中亚段沉积之后,大兴凸起之上主要发育蓟县系白云岩地层,局部发育寒武系灰岩地层。在凸起古地质背景的控制下,大兴砾岩岩石类型以杂基支撑砾岩和颗粒支撑砾岩,砾石组分主要为白云岩和灰岩,沉积构造类型单一,主要以反映重力流沉积特征的块状层理和同生变形构造为主。在沉积背景研究的基础上,结合岩心相、地震相、测井相等,建立了三种主要的砾岩体成因模式。重力流水道主要由颗粒支撑砾岩和杂基支撑砾岩组成,在垂向层序上自下而上表现为主水道、次水道叠加的正韵律组合,在Sp、Rt曲线主水道表现为高幅的箱形,次水道表现为齿化箱形或钟形;在地震剖面上,重力流水道在横向上表现为楔状的下凹充填、具有侧积或近乎水平的上超结构,在纵向上体现为明显的前积结构。碎屑流近岸水下扇岩石类型主要为颗粒支撑砾岩,在垂向上自下而上依次发育内扇、中扇和外扇,表现为向上变细的正旋回水进序列,在测井曲线上表现为箱形或齿化箱形组合,具“低Gr、高Rt”的特征,在地震剖面上表现为强振幅的向湖盆延伸的楔状体。泥石流近岸水下扇主要的岩石类型为杂基支撑的砾岩,在垂向层序上,和碎屑流型近岸水下扇一样,也是自下而上表现为内扇-中扇-外扇的水进型沉积序列,在Sp和Rt曲线上表现为齿化的钟形或箱形组合,在地震剖面上,砾岩体内部表现为强振幅的杂乱反射特征,边缘与湖相泥岩反射呈指状接触,扇体向湖盆延伸范围较小。在砾岩组分、岩石结构、砾岩成因与相带等因素的控制下,砾岩体孔渗特征和油气产能由好到差分别为:碎屑流型近岸水下扇、重力流水道和泥石流型近岸水下扇,因此,三种砾岩体成因模式的建立,对于廊固凹陷大兴砾岩的精细勘探具有重要的现实意义。
Daxing Conglomerate is located on the downthrown side of Daxing Fault in the westernLanggu Depression of Bohai Bay Basin. It is contacted or surrounded by a big set of maturehydrocarbon source rocks and has the huge resource potential. In this paper, the geologicalbackground, genetic types and sedimentary characteristics of the Daxing conglomerate in thethird member of the Oligocene Shahejie Formation (Es3) in the Langgu Depression werestudied in detail based on seismic profiler, logging, cores, petrographic thin-sections andscanning electron microscope (SEM) photos. Daxing Conglomerate was mainly developed inthe intensively faulting period of Langgu Depression. The structure evolution and faultactivity controlled the formation and distribution of Daxing Conglomerate. The pre-Paleogenetectonic movement controlled the source types of conglomerate, the Paleogene tectonicmovement controlled the vertical distribution of conglomerate, and the episodic activity andmigration controlled the genetic types and evolution. The stratum on the Daxing Bulge weremainly dominated by dolomites in Jixian System, Cambrian and Ordovician limestones andlocal Mesozoic clastic rocks before the deposition of the lower submember of the Es3. Thestratum on the Daxing Bulge were mainly characterized by dolomites in Jixian System,Cambrian limestones and local Ordovician limestones after the deposition of the lowersubmember of the Es3. The stratum on the Daxing Bulge were mainly dominated bydolomites in Jixian System and local Cambrian limestones after the deposition of the middlesubmember of the Es3. Under the control of geological background of Daxing Bulge, the rocktypes of Daxing Conglomerate were mainly matrix-supported conglomerates andgrain-supported conglomerates. The gravels in conglomerates were dominated by dolomitesand limestones. The sedimentary structures in conglomerates were simplex, which weredominated by massive bedding and contemporaneous deformation structure. Based on thedepositional setting, three genetic models of conglomerate, including gravity flow channel,grain flow nearshore subaqueous fan and mud flow nearshore subaqueous fan, have been setup depending on cores, seismic facies and electrofacies. The gravity flow channel wascharacterized by matrix-supported conglomerates and grain-supported conglomerates. Itshowed the positive sequence overlying by main channel and subchannel from bottom to topin vertical sequence. In logging caves, main channel was high amplitude box shape, and subchannel was in jugged box shape or bell shape in Sp and Rt caves. In seismic section, thegravity flow channel showed as wedgy filling with lateral accretion or nearly horizontal onlapstructure in cross section and obvious progradational reflection configuration on longitudinalsection. The grain flow nearshore subaqueous fan was dominated by grain-supportedconglomerates. In the vertical section, it was successively deposited by inner fan, middle fanand outer fan from bottom to top, showing the upward-fining retrogradation sequence. Inlogging caves, it showed as box shape or jugged box shape with characteristics of low Grvalue and high Rt value. In seismic section, it was the strong amplitude wedge set extendingto the centre of basin. The mud flow nearshore subaqueous fan was characterized bymatix-supported conglomerates. In the vertical sequence, it successively deposited by innerfan, middle fan and outer fan from bottom to top, showing the upward-fining retrogradationsequence like the grain flow nearshore subaqueous fan. In Sp and Rt caves, it showed asjugged bell or box shape. In seismic section, it showed as strong amplitude chaotic seismicreflection configuration with the border fingerlikly contacting with lacustrine mudstonereflection. Under the control of gravels, structure, genetic types and facies tract, theconglomerate bodies were grain flow nearshore subaqueous fan, gravity flow channel andmud flow nearshore subaqueous fan in poroperm characteristics and hydrocarbon productionfrom good to bad. Therefore, the establishment of three genetic models of conglomerate hasan important significance for fine exploration of oil and gas of Daxing Conglomerate inLanggu Depression.
引文
Arnott R.W.C. The role of fluid- and sediment-gravity flow processes during deposition ofdeltaic conglomerates (Cardium Formation, Upper Cretaceous), west-central Alberta.Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2003, 51(4): 426-436.
    Bjφrlykke K. Formation of secondary porosity:How important is it? In:Clastic Diagenesis(Eds D . A . McDonald & R.C.Surdam). Memoir 37 , American Association ofPetroleum Geologists,Tulsa, ok. 1984,277~286.
    Boles J.R. Secondary porosity reactions in the Stevens Sandstones, San Joaquin Valley,California. In:Clastic Diagenesis (Eds D.A.McDonald & R.C.Surdam). Memoir 37,American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK.1984, 217~225.
    Bloch S. Secondary porosity in sandstones:Significance,origin,relationship to subaerialunconformities, and effect on predrill reservoir quality prediction. In: ReservoirQuality Assessment and Prediction in Clastic Rocks (Ed.M.D.Wilson). Short Course30,Society of Sedimentary Geologist,Tulsa,OK. 1994,136~159.
    Bloch S., Lander R.H. & Bonnell , L. Anomalously high porosity and permeability indeeply buried sandstone reservoirs:Origin and predictability. American Association ofPetroleum Geologists Bulletin. 2002,86:301~328.
    Burley S.D. and Kantorowicz J.D. 1986. Thin section and SEM textural criteria for therecognition of cement dissolution porosity in sandstones. Sedimentology, 33.587-604.
    Cao J., Zhang Y.J., Hu W.X., Yao S.P., Wang X.L., Zhang Y.Q. and Tang Y. The Permianhybrid petroleum system in the northwest margin of the Junggar Basin, northwestChina. Marine and Petroleum Geology 2005, 22: 331–349.
    Clifton H. E. Supply, segregation, successions, and significance of shallow marineconglomeratic deposits. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2003, 51(4):370-388.
    Davies R J, Posamentier H W, Wood L J et al.Seismic Geomorphology: Applications toHydrocarbon Exploration and Production.London: The Geological Society, 2007,1~269.
    Ehrenberg S.N. Preservation of anomalously high porosity in deeply buried sandstones bygrain-coating chlorite : Examples from the Norwegian Continental Shelf. AAPGBulletin. 1993,77:1260-1286.
    Handin, J., Hagar R. V., Friedman G. M., and Feather J. N. Experimental deformation ofsedimentary rocks under confining pressure: pore pressure tests. AAPG Bulletin, 1963,47: 717-755.
    Hayes, M.J. & Boles, J.R. 1992. Volumetric relations between dissolved plagioclase andkaolinite in sandstones: implications for aluminum mass transfer in the San JoaquinBasin, California. Special Publication 47, Society of Economic Paleontologists andMineralogists. 111-123.
    Hart B. S. and Plint A. G. Stratigraphy and sedimentology of shoreface and fluvialconglomerates: insights from the Cardium Formation in NW Alberta and adjacentBritish Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2003, 51(4): 437-464.
    Hugman, R. H. H., and Friedman G. M. Effects of texture and composition on mechanicalbehaviour of experimentally deformed carbonate rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 1979, 63:1478-1489.
    Hurst A., Nadeau H.P. Clay microporosity in reservoir sandstones: an application ofquantitative electron microscopy in petrophy sical evaluation. AAPG Bulletin,1995,79(4):563-573
    Jia Chengzao and Chi Yingliu. Resource Potential and Exploration Techniques ofStratigraphic and subtle Reservoirs in China[J]. Petroleum Science,2004,11(2):1-12.
    Jiang, Z.X., Chen, D.Z., Qiu, L.W., Liang, H.B., Ma, J., 2007. Source-controlledcarbonates in a small Eocene half-graben lake basin (Shulu Sag) in central HebeiProvince, North China. Sedimentology, 54, 265–292.
    Krèzsek C., Filipescu S. Silye L., Matxenco L. and Doust H. Miocene facies associationsand sedimentary evolution of the Southern Transylvanian Basin (Romania):Implications for hydrocarbon exploration. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2010, 27:191-214.
    Kubo Y. and Nakajima T. Laboratory experiments and numerical simulation ofsediment-wave formation by turbidity currents. Marine Geology, 2002, 192: 105-121.
    Lu H.B., Fulthorpe C.S., Mann P. and Kominz, M.A. Miocene-Recent tectonic and climaticcontrols on sediment supply and sequence stratigraphy: Canterbury basin, NewZealand. Basin Research, 2005, 17, 311–328
    Maceachern J.A. and Hobbs T.W. The ichnological expression of marine and marginalmarine conglomerates and conglomeratic intervals, Cretaceous Western InteriorSeaway, Alberta and northeastern British Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian PetroleumGeology, 2004, 52(1): 77-104.
    Marchand A.M.E., Smalley P.C., Haseldine R.S. et al.. Note on the importance ofhudrocarbon fill for reservoir quality prediction in sandstones. American Associationof Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2002,86(9):1561-1571.
    McLeod P., Carey S., Sparks R.S.J. Behaviour of particle-laden flows into the ocean:experimental simulation and geological implication. Sedimentology, 1999, 46(3):523-536.
    Moslow T. F. and Zonneveld J. P. Foreword - Marine Conglomerate Reservoirs: Cretaceousof Western Canada and Modern Analogues. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2004, 52(1): 1-3.
    Patricia M. Dove. The dissolution kinetics of quartz in sodium chloride solutions at25°to300°. American Journal of Science,1994,294:665-712.
    Perrier R. and Quilbier J. Thickness changes in sedimentary layers during compactionhistory. AAPG Bull, 1974, 58: 507-520.
    Rogers J. P. New reservoir model from an old oil field: Garfield conglomerate pool,Pawnee County, Kansas. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(10): 1349–1365.
    Royal P. O. and Choquette P. W. Introduction, in P. O. Roehl and P. W. Choquette, eds.,Carbonate petroleum reservoirs: New York, Springer-Verlag, 1985, 1-15.
    Schmidt G.A. S. and Pemberton G. Stratigraphy and paleogeography of a conglomeraticshoreline: the Notikewin Member of the Spirit River Formation in the Wapiti area ofwest-central Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2004, 52(1): 57-76.
    Schmoker, J. W., and Halley R. B. Carbonate porosity versus depth: a predictable relationfor south Florida. AAPG Bulletin, 1982, 66: 2561-2570.
    Schmoker J. W., Krystinik K. B. and Halley R. B. Selected characteristics of limestone anddolomite reservoirs in the United States. AAPG Bulletin, 1985, 69: 733-741.
    Shanmugam G. 50 years of the turbidite paradigm (1950s-1990s): deep-water processesand facies models--a critical perspective. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2000; 17(2):285-342.
    Stearns, D. W., and Friedman G. M. Reservoirs in fractured rock, in R. E. King, ed.,Stratigraphic oil and gas fields--classification, exploration methods, and case histories,AAPG Memoir, 1972, 16: 82-106.
    Sun S.Q. Dolomite Reservoirs: Porosity Evolution and Reservoir Characteristics. AAPGBulletin, 1995, 79(2): 186-204.
    Surdam R.C., Boese S.W. & Crossey L.J. 1984. The chemistry of secondary porosity. In:Clastic Diagenesis (Eds D.A. McDonald & R.C. Surdam). Memoir 37, AmericanAssociation of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK. 127-150.
    Surdam R. C., Brosese S.W., Crossey L.J. The chemistry of secondary porosity . In:McDonald D A, Surdam R.C., eds. Clastic Diagenesis. The American Association ofPetroleum Geologists,Tulsa,Oklahoma,1985,127-150.
    Surdam, R.C. & Crossey, L.J. 1987. Integrated diagenetic modeling: a process-orientedapproach for clastic systems. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 15.141-170.
    Surdam R.C., Grossey L.J., Hagen E.S., Heasler H.P. Organic-inorganic interaction andsandstone diagenesis. AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
    Thomson A. Preservation of porosity in the deep Woodbine /Tuscaloosa trend, Louisiana:Gulf Coast. Association of Geological Societies Transactions. 1979,30:396-403.
    Thorsen C.E. Age of growth faulting in southeast Louisiana. Trans.Gulf-Coast. Ass. Geol.Socs., 1963, 13(2): 103-110.
    Wilkinson M D, Haszeldine R S, Couples G D. Secondary porosity generation during deepburial associated with over-pressure leak-off:Fulmar Formation, United KingdomCentral Graben[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(5):803-813.
    Worden,R.H.& Burley,S.D. Sandstone diagenesis: the evolution of sand to stone. In:Sandstone Diagenesis: Recent and Ancient (Eds S . D . Burley & R.H. Worden).Reprint Series Volume 4 of the International Association of Sedimentologist.
    Blackwell Science, Oxford. 2003,3~44.
    Zenger D. H., Dunham J. B. and Ethington R. L., eds. Concepts and models ofdolomitization. SEPM Special Publication, 1980, 28: 320.
    Zonneveld J. P. and Moslow T. F. Exploration potential of the Falher G shorefaceconglomerate trend: evidence from outcrop. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2004, 52(1): 23-38.
    毕义泉.东营凹陷滨县凸起南坡砂砾岩体成因模式与成藏规律[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(4):12-15.
    操应长,姜在兴,王留奇,等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层单元的划分及界面识别标志[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1996,20(4):1-5
    操应长.断陷湖盆层序地层学[M].北京:地质出版社,2005
    曹敬华,周文,傅恒,宋荣彩.廊固凹陷旧州—固安构造带沙三段层序地层特征与油气成藏关系.大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(5):29-32.
    曹倩.廊固凹陷柳泉-曹家务构造带天然气成藏作用研究:硕士学位论文.山东青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2009.
    曹颖辉,池英柳,薛良清等.沉积基准面在层序划分对比及地层岩性油气藏预测中的应用[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(1):36-40.
    曹树春,陈建渝.滨县凸起南坡砂砾岩体勘探技术与实践[J].新疆石油学院学报,2000,12(4):15-19.
    陈刚,戴俊生,叶兴树,荣磊,梁颖.生长指数与断层落差的对比研究,西南石油大学学报,2007,29(3):20-23.
    陈刚,蒋弋平,周建新,师国记,范海林.用古落差法研究沙埝地区断层活动强度,小型油气藏,2008,13(2):7-10,59.
    陈钢花,余杰,张孝珍.基于小波时频分析的测井层序地层划分方法[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(3):355-358.
    陈萍.地震反演技术在泌阳凹陷储层预测中的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(6):95-96.
    陈萍.泌阳凹陷陡坡带砂砾岩体预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(2):198-200.
    崔振昂,鲍征宇,张天付,董志诚.埋藏条件下碳酸盐岩溶解动力学实验研究.石油天然气学报, 2007, 29(3): 204-207.
    戴俊生.构造地质学及大地构造.北京:石油工业出版社,2006. 89-92
    邓宏文,王红亮,王敦则.古地貌对陆相裂谷盆地层序充填特征的控制—以渤中凹陷西斜坡区下第三系为例.石油与天然气地质,2001,22(4):293-296.
    董国臣,孙景民,张守鹏,梁冬梅.廊固凹陷古近系层序地层特征及油气储集规律探讨.中国地质,2002, 29(4): 397-400.
    费宝生.隐蔽油气藏的勘探.油气地质与采收率,2002,9(6):29-33.
    高慧君.廊固凹陷气层电测解释标准研究:硕士学位论文.四川成都:西南石油学院,2004.
    冯有良,徐秀生.同沉积构造坡折带对岩性油气藏富集带的控制作用—以渤海湾盆地古近系为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(1):22-25.
    韩宏伟,崔红庄,林松辉等.东营凹陷北部陡坡带砂砾岩扇体地震地质特征[J].特种油气藏,2002,10(4):28-30.
    洪淑新,邵红梅,王成,年喜.砾岩储层微观测试技术在徐家围子气藏研究中的应用.大庆石油地质与开发,2007, 26(4): 43-46, 50.
    胡明毅,蔡习尧,胡忠贵,钱勇,向娟.塔中地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩深部埋藏溶蚀作用研究.石油天然气学报,2009, 31(6): 49-54.
    华北油田地质志编写组.中国石油地质志·卷五.北京:石油工业出版社,1988. 93-96.
    华北油田分公司勘探开发研究院.廊固凹陷预探目标综合研究:内部科研报告.河北任丘,2003.
    黄思静,张萌,朱世全,武文慧,黄成刚. (2004)砂岩孔隙成因对孔隙度/渗透率关系的控制作用—以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组为例.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 31(6). 648-653.
    黄婷婷,周文,傅恒,宋荣彩.廊固凹陷古近系隐蔽油气藏形成条件及成藏规律.大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(6):51-56.
    靳松,朱筱敏,钟大康.扇三角洲高分辨率层序地层对比及砂体分布规律[J].中国地质,2007,25(1):212-220.
    贾承造,赵文智,邹才能等.岩性地层油气藏勘探研究的两项核心技术[J]. 2004,31(3):3-8.
    贾承造,赵政璋,杜金虎,等.中国石油重点勘探领域—地质认识、核心技术、勘探成效及勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(4):385-396.
    加东辉,徐长贵,杨波,杨香华,吴小红,周心怀,滕玉波,赖维成.辽东湾辽东带中南部古近纪古地貌恢复和演化及其对沉积体系的控制.古地理学,2007,9(2):155-166.
    姜素华,林红梅,王永诗.陡坡带砂砾岩扇体油气成藏特征-以济阳坳陷为例[J].石油物探,2003,42(3):313-317.
    姜在兴.沉积学(第二版),北京:石油工业出版社,2010. 112-113.
    蒋小琼,王恕一,范明,张建勇,管宏林,鲍云杰.埋藏成岩环境碳酸盐岩溶蚀作用模拟实验研究.石油实验地质, 2008, 30(6): 643-646.
    杨俊杰,张文征,黄思静,等.埋藏成岩作用的温压条件下,白云岩溶解过程的实验模拟研究.沉积学报,1995a,13(3):83-88
    杨俊杰,黄思静,张文征,等.表生和埋藏成岩作用的温压条件下不同组成碳酸盐岩溶蚀成岩过程的实验模拟.沉积学报,1995b,13(4):49-54.
    金凤鸣,傅恒,李仲东,周文.冀中坳陷廊固凹陷古近系层序地层与隐蔽油气藏勘探.矿物岩石,2006, 26(4): 75-82.
    孔凡仙.东营凹陷北部陡坡带砂砾岩体的勘探[J].石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(5):669-676.
    李凤杰,王多云,郑希民等.测井曲线频谱分析在含煤地层沉积旋回研究中的应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2003,31(6):14-17.
    李辉,王峰,王涛等.泌阳凹陷南部陡坡带砂砾岩体成藏模式分析[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(4):239-240.
    李军,张超谟,唐文生,李进福,肖承文.库车地区致密砂砾岩胶结指数m和饱和度指数n的主要影响因素及其量化研究.石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2009,31(6): 100-103.
    李军亮.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷深层砂砾岩储层成岩演化特征.石油实验地质,2008,30(3):252-255.
    李亮,宋子齐,于小龙,杨立雷,赵宏宇.克拉玛依油田七区砾岩储层综合评价.测井技术,2006,30(5):438-441.
    李丕龙等.陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探(卷二:陆相断陷盆地沉积体系与油气分布).北京:石油工业出版社,地质出版社,2003.
    李霞,范宜仁,杨立伟等.测井曲线小波变换特性在层序地层划分中的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(4):112-114.
    梁官忠,苗坤,党燕,张淑娟.夫特砾岩油藏储层特征研究及开发对策.石油与天然气地质,2000,21(2):151-156.
    梁宏斌,张舒亭,李清,陈永红,孙彤彤.冀中廊固凹陷火成岩成藏条件研究.特种油气藏,2003,10(1):82-85.
    林畅松,郑和荣,任建业等.渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制[J].中国科学(D辑),2003,33(11):1025-1036.
    林松辉,王华,王兴谋,等.断陷盆地陡坡带砂砾岩扇体地震反射特征-以东营凹陷为例[J].地质科技情报,2005,24(4):55-59.
    马丽娟,高平,金学新等.东营南坡东部沙河街组四段储层成因及预测方法[J].地质科技情报,2002,21(3):55-60.
    马永生,郭彤楼,赵雪凤,蔡勋育.普光气田深部优质白云岩储层形成机制,中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2007, 37(增刊2): 43-52.
    刘传虎.砂砾岩扇体发育特征及地震描述技术[J].石油物探,2001,40(1):64-72.
    刘晖,操应长,徐涛玉,等.沉积坡折带控砂的模拟实验研究.山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,26(1):34-37.
    刘晖.断陷湖盆陡坡带砂砾岩分布规律研究:硕士学位论文.山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2008. 24-25.
    刘永福,殷军,孙雄伟,金英爱,卡德乐?托乎提,党青宁.塔里木盆地东部寒武系沉积特征及优质白云岩储层成因.天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(1): 126-132.
    刘再华,Dreybrodt W.,李华举.灰岩和白云岩溶解速率控制机理的比较.地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2006, 31(3): 411-416.
    潘元林,宗国洪,郭玉新,等.济阳断陷湖盆层序地层学及砂砾岩油气藏群[J].石油学报,2003,24(3):16-23.
    漆家福,杨桥.关于碎屑岩层的去压实校正方法的讨论—兼讨论李绍虎等提出的压实校正法.石油实验地质,2001,23(3):3510356.
    钱峥,赵澄林,刘孟慧.济阳坳陷深层天然气致密砂岩储集空间成因[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1994,18(6):21~25.
    乔俊.胜坨地区砂砾岩扇体成藏机制与勘探技术分析[J].断块油气田,2005,12(4):17-19.
    邱荣华,李连生,张永华等.泌阳凹陷北部斜坡带油气富集控制因素与勘探技术[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(2):39-41.
    盛贤才,郭战峰,刘新民.秦岭—大别造山带南侧兴山地区中上寒武统白云岩储层特征.石油实验地质,2009, 31(2): 172-176.
    宋荣彩.陆相断陷盆地层序地层学与隐蔽油气藏模式研究一以廊固凹陷古近系为例:博士学位论文.四川成都:成都理工大学,2006a.
    宋荣彩,张哨楠,董树义,周文,付恒,任文博,张建锋.廊固凹陷陡坡带古近系砂砾岩体控制因素分析.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006b, 33(6): 587-592.
    宋荣彩,张哨楠,董树义,周文.廊固凹陷近岸水下扇特征及控制因素.地球科学与环境学报, 2007a, 29(2): 145-148.
    宋荣彩,张哨楠,董树义,周文,付恒,任文博,张建锋.非补偿陆相断陷盆地层序地层学研究—以廊固凹陷古近系为例.地层学杂志,2007b,31(3):254-260.
    隋风贵,李训海,朱明.箕状断陷盆地陡坡带砂砾岩扇体油藏研究——以东营凹陷北带为例[A].中国隐蔽油气藏[C].北京:地质出版社,1998.67-77.
    隋风贵.断陷湖盆陡坡带砂砾岩扇体成藏动力学特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2003,24(4):335-340.
    孙怡,鲜本忠,林会喜.断陷湖盆陡坡带砂砾岩体沉积期次的划分技术[J].石油地球物理勘探,2007,42(4):468-473.
    王宝言,隋风贵.济阳坳陷断陷湖盆陡坡带砂砾岩体分类及展布[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(3):38-41.
    王成,官艳华,肖利梅,邵红梅,洪淑新,杨连华,王平.松辽盆地北部深层砾岩储层特征.石油学报,2006, 27(增刊):52-56.
    王家豪,王华,赵忠新,潘明年,于哲.层序地层学应用于古地貌分析—以塔河油田为例.地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2003,28(4):421-430.
    王金铎,于建国,孙明江.陆相湖盆陡坡带砂砾岩扇体的沉积模式及地震识别[J].石油物探,1998,37(3):40-47.
    王宁.东营凹陷北部陡坡带砂砾岩体岩性油气藏形成机理及分布规律研究[D].北京:中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,2001.
    王志宏,柳广弟.廊固凹陷异常高压与油气成藏的关系.天然气工业, 2008, 28(6):69-72.
    文慧俭,舒萍,范传闻,庞智英,丁日新.兴城气田深层砾岩储层储集空间类型及控制因素.大庆石油学院学报,2008a, 32(3): 101-104.
    文慧俭,马世忠,丁日新,庞智英,杜鸿烈.兴城气田营四段砾岩储层岩石学特征与物源分析.大庆石油学院学报,2008b, 32(3): 98-100, 104.
    武恒志.断陷盆地砂砾岩体的发育特征-以沾化凹陷埕南断裂带下第三系沙三段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(1):52-55.
    吴继龙,卢学祺.冀中坳陷东部地区构造格架及其形成与发展.石油与天然气地质,1986,7(1):20-31.
    夏长淮,张春生,周海彬,等.濮阳凹陷白庙气田沙河街组三段下亚段扇三角洲沉积模拟研究[J] .石油与天然气地质,2002,23(3):218-222.
    鲜本忠,王永诗,周廷全等.断陷湖盆陡坡带砂砾岩体分布规律及控制因素—以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷车镇凹陷为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(4):429-436.
    鲜强,李仲东,傅恒.廊固凹陷下第三系层序地层及构造演化.物探化探计算技术,2007,29(3):244-24.
    萧德铭,杨玉峰(译),Sun S.Q. (著).白云岩储层:孔隙度演化和储层特征.国外油气勘探,1997 (3): 138-152.
    肖林萍.埋藏条件下碳酸盐岩实验室溶蚀作用模拟的热力学模型与地质勘探方向:以陕甘宁盆地下奥陶统马家沟组第五段为例.岩相古地理,1997,17(4):57-72.
    徐开礼,朱志澄.构造地质学.北京:地质出版社,1984. 65-64.
    徐维胜,赵培荣,聂鹏飞,王先德.石灰岩、白云岩储层孔隙度一渗透率关系研究.石油与天然气地质,2008, 29(6): 806-811.
    鄢继华,陈世悦,姜在兴.东营凹陷北部陡坡带近岸水下扇沉积特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(1):12-16.
    杨军侠.廊固凹陷低电阻率油气层形成机理及识别:硕士学位论文.陕西西安:西北大学,2004.
    杨桥,漆家福.碎屑岩层的分层去压实校正方法.石油实验地质,2003,25(2):206-210.
    杨晓宁,陈洪德,寿建峰,等.碎屑岩次生孔隙形成机制[J].大庆石油学院学报, 2004,28(1) :4-6.
    应凤祥,罗平,何东博,等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2004.
    于建群,姜东波.永北地区砂、砾岩油藏油气富集规律及勘探开发实践[J].特种油气藏,2001,8(2):11-14.
    余英太.廊固凹陷油藏类型及油气分布特征.石油与天然气地质,1987,8(3):286-295.
    袁选俊,谯汉生.渤海湾盆地富油气凹陷隐蔽油气藏勘探.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(2):130-133.
    袁选俊,薛良清,池英柳等.坳陷型湖盆层序地层特征与隐蔽油气藏勘探—以松辽盆地为例[J].石油学报,2003,24(3):11-15
    肖焕钦,王宝言,陈宝宁等.济阳坳陷陡坡带断裂控砂模式[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(5):19-22.
    谢风猛,武法东,陈建渝等.渤海湾盆地滨南油田砂砾岩扇体空间展布与成藏规律[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(4):334-338.
    张春生,刘忠保,施冬,等.涌流型浊流形成及发展的实验模拟[J].沉积学报,2002,20(1):25-29.
    张春生,刘忠保,施冬,等.扇三角洲形成过程及演变规律[J] .沉积学报,2000a,18(4):521-527.
    张春生,刘忠保,施冬,等.三角洲分流河道及河口坝形成过程的物理模拟[J] .地学前缘,2000b,7(3):168-176.
    张凡芹,王伟锋,王晶等.沾化凹陷断层对沉积的控制作用[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(5):1-6.
    张晶,王伟锋,班丽等.民丰洼陷岩性油气藏控制因素分析[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(3):213-215.
    张晶,王伟锋,荣启宏等.东营凹陷民丰洼陷沙河街组三段岩性油藏控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2007a,28(2):235-239.
    张晶,王伟锋,荣启宏等.东营凹陷永55区块沙四上亚段深水浊积扇沉积与油气[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007b,37(3):519-523.
    张立强,纪友亮,王声朗等.东濮凹陷陡坡带北部控凹断裂样式及砂体充填模式[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(1):43-47.
    张守鹏,滕建彬,王伟庆,田方,齐勋,陈菁,甄贞,李博.胜利油区深层砂砾岩体成岩差异与储层控制因素.油气地质与采收率,2009, 16(6): 12-16.
    张舒亭,王锋,黄海华.廊固凹陷西部大兴砾岩体油气藏形成条件研究.西安石油学院学报, 1998, 13(4): 31-33.
    张文朝,崔周旗,韩春元,郭永军,王洪生,李莉,王海潮,李新坡.冀中坳陷老第三纪湖盆演化与油气.古地理学报,2001,3(1):45-54.
    张小莉,查明,赫拴柱,王鹏.渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷地层水化学纵向分带性与油气富集[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(2):187-195.
    张以明,梁宏斌,张舒亭,欧阳华,张彦民.廊固凹陷中西部下第三系天然气藏形成条件及富集规律.天然气工业,2002,22(1):33-37.
    赵红格,刘池洋.廊固凹陷的拆离滑脱构造.西北大学学报(自然科学版),2003, 33(3):315-319.
    赵志超,罗运先,田景春.中国东部陆相盆地砂砾岩成因类型及地震地质特征[J].石油物探,1996,35(4):76-86.赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强
    赵俊兴,陈洪德,时志强.古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义—以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例.成都理工学院学报,2001,28(3):260-266.
    赵俊兴,陈洪德,向芳.高分辨率层序地层学方法在沉积前古地貌恢复中的应用.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,76-81.
    郑和荣,吴茂炳,邬兴威,张涛,刘春燕.塔里木盆地下古生界白云岩储层油气勘探前景.石油学报,2007, 28(2): 1-8.
    郑敬贵,李仲东,傅恒,赵志超,宋荣彩.廊固凹陷古近系陆相断陷湖盆层序地层发育主控因素研究.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,33(3):240-245.
    赵勇,戴俊生.应用落差分析研究生长断层,石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):13-15.
    朱国华.碎屑岩储集层孔隙的形成、演化和预测.沉积学报.1992,10(3):114-123.
    朱金富,于炳松,樊太亮,聂保锋,阮壮.沉积成岩环境对白云岩储层的影响.新疆地质, 2009, 27(1): 43-48.
    朱庆忠,李春华,杨合义.廊固凹陷沙三段深层砾岩体油藏成岩作用与储层孔隙关系研究.特种油气藏, 2003a, 10(3): 15-17.
    朱庆忠,李春华,杨合义.廊固凹陷大兴砾岩体成因与油气成藏.石油勘探与开发,2003b, 30(4): 34-36.
    朱筱敏.层序地层学[M].东营:石油大学出版社,2003. 37-39.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700