用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中小上市公司治理与成长性的关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着中国资本市场的进一步发展,中小上市公司已发展成为中国企业的主力军和优秀代表,是中国国民经济的重要组成部分。研究中小上市公司治理具有描述和解释中国经济、政治体制改革过程的典型性,具有揭示和预测中国市场经济发展状况的前瞻性,具有体现和标志中国国民经济发展水平的代表性。公司治理的核心在于保证公司的财产安全、科学决策和高效经营。对于上市公司而言,为了提升公司绩效和可持续发展能力,以吸引更多的投资者,必然要关注治理状况的改善、在行业中的地位、科学决策机制的完善等问题。公司成长性是公司治理水平和健全与否的直接而有效的反应,良好的公司治理必然与公司持续健康的发展相联系。可以说,公司治理的合理性、有效性是提高公司成长性的必要条件。从这个意义上讲,本文关于公司治理与公司成长性的研究选题具有时代紧迫性及重要的理论价值和现实意义。
     本文选取中国中小上市公司治理与成长性的关系作为研究对象,采用辩证分析方法、实证分析法、计量经济学分析方法,在中小企业理论、成长理论和公司治理理论的基础上,通过分析我国中小企业的成长和公司治理现状及进行国际比较,剖析公司治理对中小企业成长性的作用。
     本文在运用委托代理理论构建了中小企业公司治理与成长性关系模型的基础上,用主成分分析法建立由1个一级指标、4个二级指标、14个三级指标构成的中小上市公司成长性评价体系,并对我国214家中小上市公司从2002年到2005年的成长性进行了排名。然后,分别从股权治理、债权治理、董事会治理和管理层激励等四个维度研究它们与中小上市公司成长之间的关系,通过描述性统计和回归分析,得到以下结论:
     1.股权治理方面的研究发现股权集中度与公司成长性无相关关系;国有控股公司的股权比例与成长性存在正相关关系;对于国有控股公司,第一大股东对公司经营状况影响最大,第二至第五大股东持股比例合计与公司成长性存在微弱的负相关关系;对于民营公司,第一大股东持股比例与公司成长性负相关。
     2.债权治理方面的研究中,我们建立了债权治理指数F的评价体系,研究发现规模较大的国有企业治理排名位于前列;F指数与公司成长性存在显著的倒U型关系;偿债能力的提高伴随公司的低成长;债务融资与公司成长显著正相关;债务期限与公司成长性有微弱的正相关关系,债务期限结构不平衡;债务类型单一,银行借款融资占绝对地位;资产期限与公司成长性有微弱的负相关关系,资产期限结构不平衡。
     3.董事会治理方面的研究发现董事会规模、独立董事和执行董事比例、董事会受教育程度与公司后期成长性呈显著的正相关关系;董事会平稳性指数与公司当期成长性存在倒U型关系;股东单位高管人员在公司董事会兼任执行董事与公司成长性负相关;两职状态对公司成长性没有产生显著作用。
     4.管理层激励方面的研究发现年度薪金是公司重要的激励机制,对公司成长性有较高的敏感性影响;高管持股比例较低,与公司成长性存在U型关系;实际在上市公司领薪的高管人数与成长性正相关;公司规模、财务杠杆、行业属性显著影响着公司成长性和管理层激励的关系。
     最后,本文提出有利于实现我国中小上市公司持续成长的公司治理政策建议,包括政府管理、投资融资、财政税收、人力资源、激励机制、市场环境等方面,并指出我国企业公司治理的改革应该从过去的强调股权多元化向今后的强调董事会的规范建设上来。从理论上讲,这将有助于弥补国内外在该研究领域的不足,完善和发展中小企业成长理论及公司治理理论:在实践方面,这将有助于制定出完善我国中小上市公司治理的有效政策措施,促进我国中小上市公司更高、更快、更好的成长。
The core of corporate governance is for ensuring the scientific decision and the efficient operation. The level of corporate governance is essential for competetivity and we should focus on the improvement and perfection mechanism to attract investors, improve performance and sustainable development. The growth is directly related to governance level and good governance is bound to promote healthy development. We can say that the sustainability and effectiveness is essential for improving the growth. As Chinese capital market develops further, the listed SMEs are becoming the main force and good representatives of all SMEs. Studies on the listed SMEs should be prospective and representative. So the paper chooses a popular topic and both theoretically and practically meaningful.
     The study targets are the listed SMEs and we use ways of the dialectics analysis, the empirical analysis, the econometrics analysis to study the effect of governance on the growth through international comparison on the basis of the SMEs theory, the growth theory, and the company governance theory. The model about the relation between the SMEs governance and the growth based on the principal-agency theory offers necessary theory basis. Then we establish an indicator system having one first-level indicator, four second-level indicators, fourteen third-level indicators based on the analysis of principal component and empirically study the growth. Then we empirically study the relationship between the growth and corporate governance from four dimensions of the equities govemance, creditor's right governance, the board governance and the management incentive, and reach conclusions as following.
     1. The relation between the growth and the share concentration doesn't present an inverse U shape. The equities ratio held by state-owned companies is positive related to the growth. The largest shareholder affects the operation greatly for state-owned companies. The sum of top five equities ratios except the largest one is negative related to the growth. The largest equities are significantly negative related to the growth.
     2. We find that large state-owned companies are in the top thecreditor's right governance bulletin board using the creditor's right governance in our study. There is a significant inverse U shape representing the relation between the indicator F and the growth. The improvement of repaying comes with worse growth. The level of obligation is significantly positive related to the growth. The time limit of obligation is a little positive related to the growth. The time limit of obligation is unbalanced. The obligation type is simple and the borrowings from banks are the most. The time limit of assets is a little negative related to the growth. The time limit of assets is unbalanced.
     3. The study on the board governance finds that the board scale, the ratio of independent directors and managing directors and the level of directors' knowledge are significantly positive related to the growth. There is an inverse U-shape between the balance-stable indicator and the growth, and the growth is on the peak when the indicator is 0.6. The occupation of managing directors from parent companies can bring negative growth. The integration of power from directors and managers has no effect on the growth.
     4. The study on management incentive finds that the annual pay is the most important incentive mechanism and is greatly sensitive to the growth. There is a U-shape relation between the growth and the low ratio of managers' equities. The number of managers who receive payment in parent companies is positive related to the growth. The company scale, finance level and industry affect the growth significantly.
     At last we provide with political advice about macro-government, investment, finance, taxes, human resource, incentive mechanisms, macro-environment and so on. Theoretically it will make up for the lack of researches on the theme, perfect and develop the SMEs theory, growth theory and governance theory. Practically it will help make effective policies in order to promote the growth of the SMEs better.
引文
[1] Berle, Adolf and Gardiner Means. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Macmillan. 1932
    [2] 郑红亮.公司治理理论与中国国有企业改革.经济研究,1998,(10)
    [3] 陈晓红.中小企业融资.北京:经济科学出版社,2001.1~20
    [4] 中小企业上市资源调查小组.我国中小企业上市资源调研报告.证券市场导报,2005,(5):28~36
    [5] 吕国胜.中小企业研究.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2000.15~18
    [6] 陈子彤,鲁德银.中小企业发展机制及其政策含义.江苏商论,2004(8):101~103
    [7] 欧阳文和,高政利等著.中小企业公司治理理论与实务.北京:经济管理出版社,2006.3~7
    [8] Cochran. P & Wartick. S, Corporate governance, A review of Literature,1988
    [9] 李健.董事会独立性分析.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,(3):34~41
    [10] Cochran .F&Wartick·S, Corporate govemance,A review of Literature,1988
    [11] Tricker·R, International corporate governance, Prentice Hall, 1993
    [12] 吴敬琏.现代公司与企业改革.天津:天津人民出版社,1994
    [13] 钱颖一.中国的公司治理结构改革和融资改革.经济研究,1995,(1)
    [14] Blair CE.. Combining behavior management and mutual goal setting to reduce physical dependency in nursing home residents. Nurs Res., 1995, 44 (3): 160-5
    [15] Robert A Hart & James R Malley. Marginal Cost and Price Over the Business Cycle: Comparative Evidence from Japan and the United States. Working Papers Series, University of Stifling, Department of Economics. 1995, ( 13 )
    [16] 杨瑞龙.产权理论与国有企业改革.学术报告,1999
    [17] 李维安等.中国公司治理原则(草案)及其解说].南开管理评论,2001,(1)
    [18] Chan, E. Corporate govemance for the SME. Lawlink Resource, Winter, 2003
    [19] 张维迎.产权·激励与公司治理.北京:经济科学出版社,2005
    [20] [美]波特.竞争战略.北京:华夏出版社,1997
    [21] 刑以群,田园.企业深化过程及影响因素分析.浙江:浙江大学学报人文社科版,2005,(4)
    [22] Leo Sleuwaegen, Micheline Goedhuy. Growth of firms in developing countries, evidence from Cote d' Ivoire. Journal of Development Economics, 2002, (68): 117-135
    [23] Covin, J.G. & Stevin, D.P. New Venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: An industry life cycleanalysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 1990, (5): 123-135
    [24] Dorothy McCormick, Mary Njeri Kinyanjui, Gracew Ongile. Growth and Barriers to Growth Among Nairobi' s Small and Medium-Sized Garment Producers. World Development, 1997, (25): 1095-1110
    [25] Hans-Jorg Bullinge. Turbulent times require creative thinking: New European concepts in production management. Int. J. Production Economics, 1999, (60-61): 9-27
    [26] Michael A. McPherson. Growth of micro and small enterprises insouthern Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 1996, (48): 253-277
    [27] Nobuyuki Harada. Who succeeds as an entrepreneur? An analysis of the post-entry performance of new firms in Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 2003, (15): 211-222
    [28] Roberto Alvarez E. Sources of export success in small and medium-sized enterprises: the impact of public programs. International Business Review, 2004, (13): 383-400
    [29] Storey, D.J. New firm growth and bank financing. Small Business Economics, 1994, (6): 139-150
    [30] D. J. Storey. Education, training and development policies and practices in medium-sized companies in the UK: do they really influence firm performance? Omega, 2004, (30): 249-264
    [31] 陈晓红,刘晖.台湾中小企业的发展经验及其借鉴.国有资产管理,1999,(12):49~52
    [32] 陈晓红,袁莉.税收优惠:国内外中小企业发展的助推器.中南工业 大学学报(社会科学版),2002(3):262~266
    [33] 陈晓红,佘坚,何鹏等.寻找成长的理由——2004年中小上市公司成长性报告.资本市场,2005,(7),刊中刊:1~14
    [34] 陈晓红,曾江洪,韩文强等.创新——2005年中小上市公司成长性报告.资本市场,2006,(7),刊中刊:102~107
    [35] 陈晓红,佘坚,邹湘娟.基于GRA的中小上市公司成长性评价研究.证券市场导报,2005(5):11~14
    [36] 陈晓红,何鹏.上市公司规模及成长率概率分布对比实验研究.系统工程,2006,(4)
    [37] 蔡宁,陈功道.论中小企业的成长性及其衡量[J].经济学研究,2001(1):15—18
    [38] 陈泽聪,吴建芳.小型上市公司成长性指标的统计分析.财经科学,2002年7月增刊,305—308
    [39] Thomas W.Y. Man, Theresa Lau, K.F. Chan. The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002(17): 123-142
    [40] Joachim Wagner. The causal effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: first evidence from a matching approach. Economics Letters, 2002 (77): 287-292
    [41] James Foreman-Peck, Gerry Makepeace and Brian Morgan. Growth and profitability of small and medium_size_enterprises: Some Welsh Evidence. Working Paper, 2006
    [42] Vitaliy Zheka. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Ukraine. Working Paper, 2006
    [43] 徐二明,王智慧.我国上市公司治理结构与战略绩效的相关性研究.南开管理评论,2000,(4):4~14
    [44] 向朝进,谢明.我国上市公司绩效与公司治理结构关系的实证分析.管理世界,2003,(5):117~124
    [45] 白重恩等.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究.经济研究,2005,(2):81~91
    [46] 金明晓,纪明辉.我国商业银行公司治理结构与经营绩效的实证研究.税务与经济,2006,(4):1~6
    [47] 王国顺.企业理论:契约理论.北京:中国经济出版社,2006
    [48] 向朝进,谢明.公司治理结构与公司绩效.四川大学学报(哲学社会科学),2003,(2):45~50
    [49] BC Ghosh, Tan Wee Liang, et al. The key success factors, distinctive capabilities, and strategic thrusts of top SMEs in Singapore. Journal of Business Research, 2001, 51: 209-221
    [50] Elias Carayannis, John Sagi. "New" vs. "old" economy: insights on competitiveness in the global IT industry. Technovation, 2001, 21: 501-514
    [51] Frédéric Delmar, Per Davidsson,, William B. Gartner. Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 2003, 18: 189-216
    [52] Hari M. Gupta, José R. Campanha. Firms growth dynamics, competition and power-law scaling. Physica A. 2003, 323: 626-634
    [53] 张炳坤.论企业的成长性及其财务评价.经济师,1998,1:39—40
    [54] 惠恩才.关于上市公司成长性分析.财经问题研究,1998,4:49—51
    [55] 吴世农,李常青,余玮.我国上市公司成长性的判定分析和实证研究.南开管理评论,1999,4:49—57
    [56] 王向阳,徐鸿.企业成长性标准的界定研究.中国软科学,2001,7:63—66
    [57] 范柏乃,沈荣芳,陈德棉.中国风险企业成长性评价指标体系研究.科研管理,2001,1:112—117
    [58] 叶立群.关于上市公司绩效成长性分析.广西会计,2001,11:26—27
    [59] 汪强.从成长性分析看企业成长模型研究.现代会计,2003,2:48—50
    [60] 赵天翔,李晓丽.高新技术创业企业的成长性评价.华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2003,1:31—34
    [61] 王竹.企业成长性模型及评估体系研究.福建行政学院福建经济管理干部学院学报,2003,1:69—72
    [62] 陈晓红,佘坚.82家中小上市公司成长性报告.中国证券期货,2004,9
    [63] 陈晓红,佘坚,邹湘娟.基于GRA的中小上市公司成长性评价研究.2005,5:41-44
    [64] 慕静,韩文秀,李全生.基于主成分分析法的中小企业成长性评价模 型及其应用.系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(4):369-371
    [65] 郭蕊,张雁,吴欣.论企业可持续成长能力的内涵与评价方法.软科学,2005,19,(6):79-82
    [66] Berle A. JR., and G., Means. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Chicago: Commerce Clearing House,1932
    [67] Jensen.M.C.&W.H.Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3): 305-360
    [68] Levy.J. The effect of shareholding dispersion on the degree of control. Economic Journal, 1983,9,3(2): 351-369
    [69] Franks, Julian, and Colin Mayer. Ownership and Control of German corporations, manuscript, London Business School, 1994
    [70] Kaplan, Minton. Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards determinants and implications for managers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1994,(36): 225-258
    [71] Yafeh, Yishay&Oved Yosha. Large Shareholders and Banks: Who Monitors and How? Manuscript, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. 1996
    [72] Claessens, S. Corporate Governance and Equity Prices: Evidence from the Czech and Slovak Republics, Journal of Finance, 1997,(52): 1641-1679
    [73] Pedersen H., Tbomsen S.. The Financial and Operating Performance of Europe Corporate. Journal of Finance, 1999, 52
    [74] Demsetz, Harold. The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983,(26): 375-390
    [75] Morck, R., Shleifer A., Vishny R. W.. Management Ownership and Market Value--An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988,(20): 293-315
    [76] Demsetz&Lehn. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes andvConsequences. Journal of Political Economy, 1985.1155-1177
    [77] Holdemess, Sheehan, R.. Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20
    [78] 许小年,王燕.中国上市公司的所有制结构与公司治理.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000
    [79] 张红军.中国上市公司股权结构与公司绩效的理论及实证分析.经济 科学,2000,4
    [80] 连其陈.股权结构与公司绩效的实证研究.福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2003,5
    [81] 王曦,齐欢,肖恒辉.我国高技术上市公司股权集中度研究.商业研究,2003,(24):78-81
    [82] 郑德理,沈华珊.论中国上市公司股权结构的安排相对控股模式在中国的运用.资本运营,2001,(6):41-47
    [83] 林乐芬.上市公司股权集中度实证研究.经济学研究,2005,(11):53-57
    [84] 苑德军,郭春丽.股权集中度与上市公司价值关系的实证研究.财贸经济,2005,(9):62-67
    [85] 高明华,初蕾.大股东持股适度区间与公司绩效—对我国民营上市公司股权结构的实证分析.齐鲁学刊,2004,(4):79-83
    [86] 董梅生,李致平.股权结构与公司绩效关系的实证研究.安徽工业大学学报,2005,22(1):76-80
    [87] 王俊峰,赵晓涛.股权结构对上市公司成长性影响的研究.重庆工学院报,2005,19(6):15~18
    [88] 谢军,曾晓涛.股权结构和公司成长性:上市公司股权激励结构的实证分析.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(5):55~61
    [89] 谢军.第一大股东、股权集中度和公司绩效.经济评论,2006,(1):70~75
    [90] 纪志明.上市公司成长性的行业特征分析.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(5):62~67
    [91] Ross. The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive Signaling Approach. Bell Journal of Economics, 1977,(8): 23-40
    [92] Ronald W. Masulis. The Impact of Capital Structure Change on Firm Value: Some Estimates. The Journal of Finance, 1983, 38(1): 107-126
    [93] MC Jensen. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(2): 323-329
    [94] 吕长江,王克敏.上市公司资本结构,股利分配及管理股权比例相比作用机制研究[J].会计研究,2002,(3):39-48
    [95] 汪辉.上市公司债务融资,公司治理与市场价值.经济研究,2003,(8):28-35
    [96] 张丽艳,路世昌,丛静.家电业上市公司资本结构的财务影响因素分 析.辽宁工程技术大学学报:社会科学版,2004,(1):36-38
    [97] 陆正飞,韩霞,常琦.公司长期负债与投资行为关系研究——基于中国上市公司的实证分析.管理世界,2006,(1):120-128
    [98] Titman. S. and Wessels. The determinant of capital structure choice. Journal of Finance, 1988, 43: 1-19
    [99] Jonathan R. Macey, Geoffrey P. Miller. Corporate Governance and Commercial Banking: A Comparative Examination of Germany, Japan, and the United States. Stanford Law Review, 1995, 48(1): 73-112
    [100] 陆正飞,辛宇.上市公司资本结构主要影响因素之实证研究.会计研究,1998,(8):34-37
    [101] 洪锡熙,沈艺峰.我国上市公司资本结构影响因素的实证分析.厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2000,(3):114-120
    [102] 邓晓岚,王宗军,骆杰伟等.我国制药行业上市公司资本结构的实证分析.财贸研究,2005,16(2):97-103
    [103] Lang, Larry H. P., Rene M. Stulz. Tobin's q, corporate diversification, and firm value. Journal of Political Economy, 1994, 102: 1248-1280
    [104] S Chaplinsky, G Niehaus. Do inside ownership and leverage share common determinants. Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics, 1993, 32: 51-55
    [105] Rajan, R.G, Zingales, L. What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international date. Journal of Finance, 1995,(1): 1421-1461
    [106] P Booth, G Matysiak. Unsmoothing Real Estate Returns: How Should it Affect Pension Plan Asset Allocation? Real Estate Finance and Investment Research Paper No 2001, 6
    [107] 吴世农,李常青,余玮.我国上市公司成长性的判定分析和实证研究.南开管理评论,1999,(4):49-57
    [108] 文宏.资本结构与公司治理——对中国上市公司的实证分析.《中国资本市场前沿理论研究文集》社会科学文献出版社,2000,(4)
    [109] 杜莹,刘立国.中国上市公司债权治理效率的实证分析.证券市场导报,2002,(12):66-69
    [110] 李映照,陈妮娜.我国制造业上市公司资本结构的影响因素研究.统计与决策,2005,(20):45-47
    [111] Gerard Caprio, Jr. and Ash Demirgü-Kunt. The Role of Long-Term Finance: Theory and Evidence[R], The World Bank Research Observer, 1998, 13 (2): 171-189
    [112] Robert.C.Higgins. 财务管理分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998
    [113] Stewart C. Myers, Stuart M. Tumbull. Capital Budgeting and the Capital Asset Pricing Model: Good News and Bad News. The Journal of Finance, 1977, 32 (2): 321-333
    [114] Morris, J. R. On corporate debt maturity strategies. Journal of Finance, 1976, 31(1): 29-37
    [115] Emery, G. W. Cyclical demand and the choice of debt maturity. Journal of Business, 2001, 74(4): 557-590
    [116] R Stulz. Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financial Policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 1990 (26): 3-27
    [117] O.Hart, J.Moore. Default and renegotiation: a dynamic model of debt. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, 113(1): 1-41
    [118] 谢军.企业成长性的因素分析:来自上市公司的证据[J].经济管理·新管理,2005,(20):82-88
    [119] 韩德宗,向凯.我国上市公司债券融资结构的实证研究——以医药、生物制品行业为例[J].经济科学,2003(2):68-75
    [120] M Harris, A Ravid. The Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Finance,1991, 46(1): 297-355
    [121] Paul Marsh. The choice between equity and debt: An empirical study. Journal of Finance, 1982, 37(1): 121-144
    [122] 程惠芳,幸勇.中国科技企业的资本结构、企业规模与企业成长性[J].世界经济,2003,26(12):72-75
    [123] Modigliani, Franco, Merton Miller. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, The American Economic Review, 1958, 48 (3): 261-97
    [124] MS Scholes, M Wolfson. Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1992
    [125] MJ Flannery. Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice. Journal of Finance, 1986, 41(1): 19-37
    [126] 赖光庭.台湾线上游戏消费者行为之探讨.台湾淡江大学管理科学研究所硕士论文,2004,5:46
    [127] Lipton, M., and J. Lorsch. A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 1992, 48: 59-77
    [128] Jensen, M.. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 1993, 48: 831-880
    [129] Yermack. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996, 40: 185-438
    [130] Eisenberg, T., S. Sundgren, and M. Wells. Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, 48: 35-54
    [131] D.J.Denis & A. Sarin. Agency Problems, Equity Ownership and Cooperate Diversification. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52: 135-467
    [132] 于东智,池国华.董事会规模、稳定性与公司绩效:理论与经验分析.经济研究,2004,4:70—79
    [133] Agrawal, A., and C. Knoeber. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996, 31: 377-397
    [134] Hermalin, B., and M. Weisbach. Board of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: Survey of the Economic Literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 2003, 4: 7-26
    [135] 李有根,赵西萍,李怀祖.上市公司的董事会构成和公司绩效研究.中国工业经济,2001,(5):48-53
    [136] 何问陶,王金全.我国独立董事制度的实证分析.财贸经济,2002,(9):61-64
    [137] 高明华,马守莉.独立董事制度与公司绩效关系的实证分析——兼论中国独立董事有效行权的制度环境.斯拉夫南开经济研究,2002,(2):64-68
    [138] 于东智.转轨经济中的上市公司治理.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
    [139] 杨洁,郑军,承龙.独立董事制度与公司绩效.经济学动态,2004,12:57-59
    [140] 过欣欣.我国上市公司董事会功能分析.清华大学硕士学位论文,2001
    [141] 李常青,赖建清.董事会特征影响公司绩效吗?金融研究,2004,5:64-78
    [142] Bai Chong-En, Qiao Liu, and Frank Song. The Value of Corporate Control: Evidence from China's ST Companies. Working Paper, CCFR, University of Hong Kong, 2002
    [143] 宋逢明,袁萍,高峰.国有大股东是否影响中国公司董事会治理.2006中国金融国际年会,2006
    [144] 张逸杰,王艳,唐元虎,蔡来兴.上市公司董事会特征和盈余管理关系的实证研究.管理评论,2006(3)
    [145] Crutchley E. Claire et al., An Examination of Board Stability and the Long-term Performance of Initial Public Offerings. Financial Management, Autumn, 2002, 63-90
    [146] Johnson. J..Daily, C., and Ellstrand, A., Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management. 1996, 22: 409-438
    [147] Murphy, Kevin J. Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1985,(7): 11-41
    [148] Coughlan, Anne and Ronald Schmidt. Executive compensation, Management Turnover, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985, (7): 43~66
    [149] Benston, George. The Self-Serving Management Hypothesis: Some Evidence. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1985, (7): 67~83
    [150] Jensen, Michael and Kevin Murphy. Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98(2): 225~264
    [151] Kaplan, Steven. Top Executives, Turnover, and Firm Performance in Germany. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1994a, (10): 142~159
    [152] Kaplan, Steven. Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance: A Comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 1994b, (102): 510~546
    [153] Haubrich, Joseph. Risk Aversion, Performance Pay, and the Principal-Agent Problem. Journal of Political Economy, 1994, (102): 258~176
    [154] Kaplan, Steven. The Effects of Management Buyouts on Operating Performance and Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989, (24): 217~254
    [155] Smith C, Watts R. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividends, and compensation policies[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1992, 32:263~292
    [156] Mehran. Executive Ownership and Firm Performance and Firm Performance. Finance & Economy, 1995, (38): 163-184
    [157] Brian J. Hall & Jeffrey B. Liebman. Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998,113 (3): 653-691
    [158] Sesil, J.C., Kroumova M.K., Blasi, J.R., & Kruse, D.L..Broad-Based Stock Options : Company Performance and Characteristics. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 2000
    [159] Frye, M. A.. Encoding properties of the wing hinge stretch receptor in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, (204): 3693-3702
    [160] Phillip J. Mcknight, Cyril Tomkins.Top Executive Pay in the United Kingdom: A Corporate Governance Dilemma. International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor and Francis Journals, 1999,6(2): 223-243
    [161] Jensen, Michael and Kevin Murphy. Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98 (2): 225-263
    [162] Eemsetz, Harold and Kenneth Lehn. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 1985, (93): 1155-1177
    [163] Himmerberg, C, Hubbard, R.G. and D. Palia. Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 53,353-384
    [164] Core J , Guay W. The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics ,1999,28: 151-184
    [165] Morck, et al. Characteristics of Targets of Hostile and Friendly Takeovers. In A. Auerbach, ed, Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988
    [166] McConnell, John and Henri Servaes. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 1990, (27): 595-612
    [167] Hermalin, B.E. and Weisbech, M.S.. The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance. Rochester, Business-Financial Research and Policy Studies.1991,91-02
    [168] Rachel Griffith. Using the ARD establishment level data to look at foreign ownership and productivity in the UK. Institute for Fiscal Studies, IFS Working Papers W1999, (06)
    [169] Bamhart, Sc.W. and Rosenstein, St.. Board composition, managerial ownership and firm performance: An empirical analysis. Financial Review, 1998, 3 (4): 1~16
    [170] 魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司绩效.经济研究,2000,(3):32-39+64+80
    [171] 李增泉.激励机制与企业绩效——基于上市公司的实证研究.会计研究,2000,(1):24-30
    [172] 于东智,谷立日.上市公司管理层持股的激励效用及影响因素.经济理论与经济管理,2001,(9):24~30
    [173] 薛许军,吴晓萍.我国上市公司经理层报酬激励机制研究.当代经济科学,2005,27(4):79~112
    [174] 张晖明,陈志广.高级管理人员激励与企业绩效.世界经济文汇,2002,(4):29~35
    [175] 周建波,孙菊生.经营者股权激励的治理效应研究.经济研究,2003,(5):74~93
    [176] 周兆生.中国上市公司总经理激励的实证研究.企业改革,2003,(3):50~57
    [177] 谢军.经理持股和经营绩效经理持股激励功能.财经论丛,2005,(6):85~90
    [178] 李维安,张国萍.经理层治理评价指数与相关绩效的实证研究.经济研究,2005,(11):87~98
    [179] 纪晓丽,黄化.民营上市公司管理层激励与企业绩效实证研究.经济体制改革,2006,(3):60~62
    [180] 杨蕙馨,王胡峰.国有企业高层管理人员激励与企业绩效实证研究.南开经济研究,2006,(4):82~97
    [181] 施东晖.中国股市微观行为:理论与实证.上海:上海远东出版社,2001
    [182] 宋增基,张宗益.上市公司经营者报酬与公司绩效实证研究.重庆大学学报,2002,25(11):90~93
    [183] 刘国亮,王加胜.上市公司股权结构、激励制度及绩效的实证研究.经济理论与经济管理,2000,(5):40~45
    [184] 陈朝龙.中国上市公司管理层激励的实证研究.重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2002(5):24~26
    [185] 王华,黄之骏.经营者股权激励、董事会组成与企业价值.管理世界,2006,(9):101~116
    [186] 刘善敏,谌新民.经营者报酬激励的规模与行业特性.华南师范大学学报,2005,(2):25~37
    [187] 李玲.管理层薪酬和持股激励效应的行业性差异分析.中央财经大学学报,2006,(4):81~86
    [188] 李克文,郑录军.高管人员激励机制与商业银行经营绩效.南开学报,2005,(1):71~76
    [189] 姚艳虹,曾德明.高层管理者激励方式与企业绩效的相关性研究.财经理论与实践,2006,27(139):96~100
    [190] 张鸣,陈震.高管报酬隐性激励的实证研究.财经研究,2006,32(3):56~63
    [191] Jensen, Michael and William Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3): 305-360

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700