中国大陆浅层地壳地应力场分布规律及工程扰动特征研究
|
摘要
地应力是赋存于岩体中的自然应力,其不仅是地质环境与地壳稳定性评价,也是地质工程设计和施工的重要资料之一。随着我国交通、水利水电、核废料存储、石油和矿山等行业的发展,人类在地壳上活动空间的广度和深度不断发展,地应力对工程和科研的影响和作用日益显著。现我国已积累了大量的地应力实测数据和工程实例,为研究我国大陆浅层地壳地应力场分布规律及工程扰动特征,本文基于我国大陆及邻区的地质架构、震源机制解和大地形变场等特征,分析了我国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场特征,通过收集大量的地应力实测资料,系统研究了我国大陆地区浅层地壳实测地应力的分布规律,另以三峡永久船闸和大岗山地下厂房为工程背景,通过开挖全过程数值仿真,研究了深挖岩坡和大型地下洞室开挖地应力场的工程扰动特征,主要研究工作和成果体现在以下几个方面:
(1)总结分析了各种地应力测定方法的优缺点和适用性,从岩体的非均匀性、测定方法本身以及地质力学的角度,研究了不同方法间测定结果的差异,形成对地应力测定方法及其结果的科学评价体系。
(2)针对原生裂隙重张试验确定裂隙法向应力精度高,并可进行大尺度三维地应力测量,但当原生裂隙间距大时,应考虑应力梯度的问题。研究了考虑应力梯度的原生裂隙水压致裂法三维地应力测量,基于地应力沿埋深的分布规律,简化出单孔的线性应力梯度形式及区域应力场的全应力张量表述,推导了基于遗传算法和最小二乘法的计算过程,并首次在国内工程中得到了运用。
(3)通过总结中国大陆及邻区地壳的形成演化、岩石圈结构、断裂体系分布和板块活动等特征,分析了我国大陆及邻区的现代地质架构特征。并根据我国大陆及邻区的震源机制解和大地形变的已有研究成果,系统分析了我国大陆及邻区的现代构造应力场特征和动力学特性。
(4)通过收集大量的地应力实测数据和相关资料,分析了我国大陆地区实测地应力的应力方向分布规律。
根据我国400多个钻孔的实测地应力数据建立了数据库,筛选了受地形地貌和局部地质条件影响小的约450组数据作为统计样本,研究了我国大陆浅层地壳实测地应力沿埋深的分布规律。
建立了我国大陆地区垂直应力σ_v、最大水平主应力σ_H和最小水平主应力σ_h随埋深的散点分布图,建立了(σ_H+σ_h)/2σ_v、σ_H/σ_h、σ_H/σ_v、σ_h/σ_v随埋深分布的散点图,并进行了相应的统计分析,系统研究了我国大陆地区实测地应力沿埋深的分布规律。
(5)基于所建立的地应力实测数据库,按地质成因分类,岩浆岩选取了111组数据,沉积岩选取了232组,变质岩选取了70组,建立了岩浆岩、沉积岩和变质岩地应力沿埋深的各种散点分布图,研究了不同岩性的地应力分布规律,及岩性变化对地应力的影响。
筛选带有弹性模量的地应力的实测数据,研究了弹性模量随埋深的变化规律,并研究了弹性模量与应力量值的关系,以及对σ_H、σ_h和σ_v的影响。
(6)研究了现今地应力的组成,结合地应力沿埋深的分布及孔隙水、温度、地表地质作用等对地应力的影响规律,在侧向约束应力状态的基础上,探讨了考虑多因素的地应力估算模型。
(7)以三峡水利枢纽和大岗山水电工程为实例,利用震源机制解、水系形态分布、断层擦痕等分析了工程区域地应力场,基于工程区及邻区实测地应力结果,并结合工程区地应力场反演,研究了大型工程区的地应力场分布特征、影响因素。并从地质力学的角度,研究了区域与工程区地应力场的联系与差异。
(8)以三峡永久船闸高边坡和大岗山地下厂房工为工程背景,对深挖岩质高边坡和大型地下洞室开挖周边岩体的应力场、变形场和塑性破坏区的分布特征和变化规律,进行了全过程数值仿真研究。
根据工程开挖后的应力场扰动特征,提出了将应力场分为应力强扰动区、应力弱扰动区和应力未扰动区三个区。探讨了根据周边岩体的I_1、J_2、Lode参数、应力量值的变化规律,进行地应力场工程扰动分区,并分析了其工程意义。
Geostress is natural stress which hosted in the rock mass.It is one of most important data for the design and construction of the geological engineering,the evaluation index of geological environment and crustal stability.With the fast developing of transportation,water resources and hydropower,nuclear waste disposal, petroleum,mining and etc,in our country,the width and depth of human activity space is being more and more widely,and geostress is being more and more important for engineering and research.There are much geostress measured data and engineering examples in our country.In order to research the distribution rules of geostress field and the disturbed characteristics of construction in our country's mainland,based on the geological frame of our country and neighboring region,the mechanism solutions of earthquake focus and the characteristic of the geodetic deformation fields evolution,the characteristic of the tectonic stress field in our country was studied.By collecting vast geostress measured data,the distribution rules of measured geostress in our country was systematically studied.Based on the background of Three Gorges permanent lock slope and Dagangshan underground powerhouse,the characteristics of geostress field and disturb zones for high slope and large underground cavern were studied using the whole process numerical simulation. The main research work and achievement of this dissertation are as follows.
(1) the advantages and disadvantages and the applicability of various geostress measured methods were summarized.From the view of the rock mass nonuniformity, measured method itself and geomechanics,the result difference among different measured methods were studied,which formed the scientific evaluation system of geostress measured methods and its results.
(2) The preexisting fracture reopening test can determine fracture normal stress with high precision,and also can measure large scale three dimensional geostress.But if the space of the preexisting fracture was large,the stress gradient should be considered.Considering the stress gradient,the preexisting fracture hydraulic fracturing three dimensional geostress measured test was studied.Base on the distribution rule of the geostress with depth,the complete stress tensor expression of the linear stress gradient form of the vertical hole and the regional tectonic stress field were simplified,and the calculation process based on the genetic algorithm and the least square method were derived.It was first applied in the projects in our country.
(3) From summarizing the characteristics of the formation and evolution of earths crust,the lithosphere structure,the distribution of fault systems and the plate activity in Chinese mainland and neighboring region,the nowadays characteristic of the geological condition in these regions were analyzed.Based on the existing research results of mechanism solutions of earthquake focus and geodetic deformation in Chinese mainland and neighboring region,the characteristic of nowadays tectonic stress field and the dynamics property in these regions were systemic studied.
(4) Through collecting a vast amount of the measured geostress data and correlative materials,the distribution property of the measured stress orientation in Chinese mainland was analyzed.
Through collecting the measured geostress data from about 400 drillings,a database was established.450 groups data with less topographical and local influence are selected as statistical samples,to study the distribution rule of the shallow crustal geostress in Chinese mainland.
The dispersed point charts of the vertical stress,the maximum and the minimum horizontal principal stress varying with the depth were established.And the dispersed point charts of the ratios of the average horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress,the maximum and the minimum horizontal principal stress,the maximum and the minimum horizontal principal stress,the maximum horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress,the minimum horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress were also established.After corresponding statistical analysis,the distribution rules of the geostress in Chinese mainland were systemic studied.
(5) According to their geological origins,111 groups of magmatic rocks data, 232 groups of sedimentary rocks data and 70 groups of metamorphic rocks data were selected from the established database of measured geostress data.The dispersed point charts of the geostress in the three types of rock varying with the depth were established,and the distribution rules of the geostress in different lithology were studied.
Based on the measured geostress data with elastic modulus,the change rule of elastic modulus with depth was studied.The relationship between the rock strength, elastic modulus and the magnitude of geostress,and its impact on the maximum,the minimum horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress were studied.
(6) The component of nowadays geostress were studied.According to the distribution rules of the geostress of depth and the influence rules of geostress by the pore water,temperature,geologic effect,the multi-factor geostress model with lateral restraint were discussed.
(7) Referring to the Three Gorges Project and Dagangshan hydropower project as examples,the stress field of engineering areas was analyzed with mechanism solutions of earthquake focus,water system form distribution and fault striation. Based on the measured geostress in engineering areas and neighboring region, combining with the stress field back analysis of engineering areas,the distribution characteristics and the influencing factors of stress field of the big engineering areas were studied.From the geomechanics point of view,the relationship and difference between the regional tectonic and engineering areas stress field were analyzed.
(8) Based on the background of Three Gorges permanent lock slope and Dagangshan underground powerhouse,using the whole process numerical simulation, the distribution characteristics and variation law of the stress field,deformation field and plastic zones of rock mass surrounding the large-scale underground cavern and the deep excavation and high rock slope were system studied.
Based on the disturbed characteristics of the stress field after excavation,the stress field were divided into three zones,strong stress disturbed zones,weak stress disturbed zones and none stress disturbed zones.The change law of I_1,J_2,Lode parameters and the magnitude of the geostress of the surrounding rock were analyzed, and the methods for distinguish the disturbed zones and its engineering sense were also analyzed.
(1)总结分析了各种地应力测定方法的优缺点和适用性,从岩体的非均匀性、测定方法本身以及地质力学的角度,研究了不同方法间测定结果的差异,形成对地应力测定方法及其结果的科学评价体系。
(2)针对原生裂隙重张试验确定裂隙法向应力精度高,并可进行大尺度三维地应力测量,但当原生裂隙间距大时,应考虑应力梯度的问题。研究了考虑应力梯度的原生裂隙水压致裂法三维地应力测量,基于地应力沿埋深的分布规律,简化出单孔的线性应力梯度形式及区域应力场的全应力张量表述,推导了基于遗传算法和最小二乘法的计算过程,并首次在国内工程中得到了运用。
(3)通过总结中国大陆及邻区地壳的形成演化、岩石圈结构、断裂体系分布和板块活动等特征,分析了我国大陆及邻区的现代地质架构特征。并根据我国大陆及邻区的震源机制解和大地形变的已有研究成果,系统分析了我国大陆及邻区的现代构造应力场特征和动力学特性。
(4)通过收集大量的地应力实测数据和相关资料,分析了我国大陆地区实测地应力的应力方向分布规律。
根据我国400多个钻孔的实测地应力数据建立了数据库,筛选了受地形地貌和局部地质条件影响小的约450组数据作为统计样本,研究了我国大陆浅层地壳实测地应力沿埋深的分布规律。
建立了我国大陆地区垂直应力σ_v、最大水平主应力σ_H和最小水平主应力σ_h随埋深的散点分布图,建立了(σ_H+σ_h)/2σ_v、σ_H/σ_h、σ_H/σ_v、σ_h/σ_v随埋深分布的散点图,并进行了相应的统计分析,系统研究了我国大陆地区实测地应力沿埋深的分布规律。
(5)基于所建立的地应力实测数据库,按地质成因分类,岩浆岩选取了111组数据,沉积岩选取了232组,变质岩选取了70组,建立了岩浆岩、沉积岩和变质岩地应力沿埋深的各种散点分布图,研究了不同岩性的地应力分布规律,及岩性变化对地应力的影响。
筛选带有弹性模量的地应力的实测数据,研究了弹性模量随埋深的变化规律,并研究了弹性模量与应力量值的关系,以及对σ_H、σ_h和σ_v的影响。
(6)研究了现今地应力的组成,结合地应力沿埋深的分布及孔隙水、温度、地表地质作用等对地应力的影响规律,在侧向约束应力状态的基础上,探讨了考虑多因素的地应力估算模型。
(7)以三峡水利枢纽和大岗山水电工程为实例,利用震源机制解、水系形态分布、断层擦痕等分析了工程区域地应力场,基于工程区及邻区实测地应力结果,并结合工程区地应力场反演,研究了大型工程区的地应力场分布特征、影响因素。并从地质力学的角度,研究了区域与工程区地应力场的联系与差异。
(8)以三峡永久船闸高边坡和大岗山地下厂房工为工程背景,对深挖岩质高边坡和大型地下洞室开挖周边岩体的应力场、变形场和塑性破坏区的分布特征和变化规律,进行了全过程数值仿真研究。
根据工程开挖后的应力场扰动特征,提出了将应力场分为应力强扰动区、应力弱扰动区和应力未扰动区三个区。探讨了根据周边岩体的I_1、J_2、Lode参数、应力量值的变化规律,进行地应力场工程扰动分区,并分析了其工程意义。
Geostress is natural stress which hosted in the rock mass.It is one of most important data for the design and construction of the geological engineering,the evaluation index of geological environment and crustal stability.With the fast developing of transportation,water resources and hydropower,nuclear waste disposal, petroleum,mining and etc,in our country,the width and depth of human activity space is being more and more widely,and geostress is being more and more important for engineering and research.There are much geostress measured data and engineering examples in our country.In order to research the distribution rules of geostress field and the disturbed characteristics of construction in our country's mainland,based on the geological frame of our country and neighboring region,the mechanism solutions of earthquake focus and the characteristic of the geodetic deformation fields evolution,the characteristic of the tectonic stress field in our country was studied.By collecting vast geostress measured data,the distribution rules of measured geostress in our country was systematically studied.Based on the background of Three Gorges permanent lock slope and Dagangshan underground powerhouse,the characteristics of geostress field and disturb zones for high slope and large underground cavern were studied using the whole process numerical simulation. The main research work and achievement of this dissertation are as follows.
(1) the advantages and disadvantages and the applicability of various geostress measured methods were summarized.From the view of the rock mass nonuniformity, measured method itself and geomechanics,the result difference among different measured methods were studied,which formed the scientific evaluation system of geostress measured methods and its results.
(2) The preexisting fracture reopening test can determine fracture normal stress with high precision,and also can measure large scale three dimensional geostress.But if the space of the preexisting fracture was large,the stress gradient should be considered.Considering the stress gradient,the preexisting fracture hydraulic fracturing three dimensional geostress measured test was studied.Base on the distribution rule of the geostress with depth,the complete stress tensor expression of the linear stress gradient form of the vertical hole and the regional tectonic stress field were simplified,and the calculation process based on the genetic algorithm and the least square method were derived.It was first applied in the projects in our country.
(3) From summarizing the characteristics of the formation and evolution of earths crust,the lithosphere structure,the distribution of fault systems and the plate activity in Chinese mainland and neighboring region,the nowadays characteristic of the geological condition in these regions were analyzed.Based on the existing research results of mechanism solutions of earthquake focus and geodetic deformation in Chinese mainland and neighboring region,the characteristic of nowadays tectonic stress field and the dynamics property in these regions were systemic studied.
(4) Through collecting a vast amount of the measured geostress data and correlative materials,the distribution property of the measured stress orientation in Chinese mainland was analyzed.
Through collecting the measured geostress data from about 400 drillings,a database was established.450 groups data with less topographical and local influence are selected as statistical samples,to study the distribution rule of the shallow crustal geostress in Chinese mainland.
The dispersed point charts of the vertical stress,the maximum and the minimum horizontal principal stress varying with the depth were established.And the dispersed point charts of the ratios of the average horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress,the maximum and the minimum horizontal principal stress,the maximum and the minimum horizontal principal stress,the maximum horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress,the minimum horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress were also established.After corresponding statistical analysis,the distribution rules of the geostress in Chinese mainland were systemic studied.
(5) According to their geological origins,111 groups of magmatic rocks data, 232 groups of sedimentary rocks data and 70 groups of metamorphic rocks data were selected from the established database of measured geostress data.The dispersed point charts of the geostress in the three types of rock varying with the depth were established,and the distribution rules of the geostress in different lithology were studied.
Based on the measured geostress data with elastic modulus,the change rule of elastic modulus with depth was studied.The relationship between the rock strength, elastic modulus and the magnitude of geostress,and its impact on the maximum,the minimum horizontal principal stress and the vertical stress were studied.
(6) The component of nowadays geostress were studied.According to the distribution rules of the geostress of depth and the influence rules of geostress by the pore water,temperature,geologic effect,the multi-factor geostress model with lateral restraint were discussed.
(7) Referring to the Three Gorges Project and Dagangshan hydropower project as examples,the stress field of engineering areas was analyzed with mechanism solutions of earthquake focus,water system form distribution and fault striation. Based on the measured geostress in engineering areas and neighboring region, combining with the stress field back analysis of engineering areas,the distribution characteristics and the influencing factors of stress field of the big engineering areas were studied.From the geomechanics point of view,the relationship and difference between the regional tectonic and engineering areas stress field were analyzed.
(8) Based on the background of Three Gorges permanent lock slope and Dagangshan underground powerhouse,using the whole process numerical simulation, the distribution characteristics and variation law of the stress field,deformation field and plastic zones of rock mass surrounding the large-scale underground cavern and the deep excavation and high rock slope were system studied.
Based on the disturbed characteristics of the stress field after excavation,the stress field were divided into three zones,strong stress disturbed zones,weak stress disturbed zones and none stress disturbed zones.The change law of I_1,J_2,Lode parameters and the magnitude of the geostress of the surrounding rock were analyzed, and the methods for distinguish the disturbed zones and its engineering sense were also analyzed.
引文
[1]周维垣,高等岩石力学.1989,北京:水利电力出版社.
[2]于学馥,郑颖人,刘怀恒等.地下工程围岩稳定分析[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1983.
[3]蔡美峰.地应力测量原理和技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[4]刘允芳,罗超文,盛谦.岩体与地应力建设[M].湖北科学技术出版社,2000.9.
[5]陶振宇,潘别桐.岩石力学理论与方法[M].武汉:中国地质出版社,1991.
[6]谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.
[7]许忠淮.地应力研究现状与展望[J].学科发展与研究,1990(5):27-34.
[8]谢富仁,崔效锋,张景发.中国现代构造应力场基本特征与分区[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.
[9]蔡美峰.地应力及原位地应力测量,见:中国岩石力学与工程世纪成就[M].王思敬.江苏:河海大学出版社,2004,485-515.
[10]李方全,廖椿庭.地应力测量实例.地质科技,1973(3):67-73.
[11]Zoback M.l.,Zoback M.D.,Adams J.,et.al.Global patterns of tectonic stress.Nature,1989,341:291-298.
[12]王连捷 潘立宙 廖椿庭.地应力测量及其在工程中的应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
[13]Haimson B Fairhurst C.Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rock [J].Soc Pet Eng,1967:310-318.
[14]Richardson R.M.,Solomon S.C.,Sleep N.H.Tectonic stress in the plates[J].Rev Geophys Phys,1979,17:981-1019
[15]C.Fairhurst.Stress estimation in rock:a brief history and review[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2003,(40):957-973.
[16]C.Ljunggren,Yanting Chang,T.Janson.An overview of rock stress measurement methods[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2003,(40),975-989.
[17]Zoback M L.Injection induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site,Germany[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1997,102(B8):18477-18491.
[18]F.Tonon,B.Amadei.Stress in anisotropic rock masses:an engineering perspective building on geological knowledge[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2003,(40),1099-1120.
[19]苏生瑞,黄润秋,王士天.断裂构造对地应力场的影响及其工程应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
[20]王连捷,任希飞,丁原辰.地应力测量在采矿工程中的应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1994.
[21]裴伟.地壳应力状态.国家地震局地震大队情报资料室译[M].北京:地震出版社,1978.
[22]蔡美峰.岩石力学与工程[M].北京:科学技术出版社,2002.
[23]万天丰.古构造应力场[M].北京:地质出版社,1988.
[24]失焕春,李浩.论岩体构造应力[J].水利学报,2001,(9):81-85.
[25]许忠淮.岩石层应力场[J].地震地磁观测与研究,1997,18(1):18-37.
[26]C.Lithgow-Bertelloni,J.H.Guynn.岩石层应力场的起源(一)[J].世界地震译丛,2005,1:77-89.
[27]C.Lithgow-Bertelloni,J.H.Guynn.岩石层应力场的起源(二)[J].世界地震译丛,2005,2:74-83.
[28]C.Lithgow-Bertelloni,J.H.Guynn.岩石层应力场的起源(三)[J].世界地震译丛,2005,3:68-84.
[29]Hast N.The state of stress in upper part of earth' s crust.Tectonophysic,1969,8:169-211.
[30]Hamson,B.c.The hydrofracluring Stress measuring technique method and rcent fieldresults in U.S.Proe.international society of Mechancs Symposium on Investigation of Stress in Rock Advances in Stress Measurement,1976,Sydney.
[31]Worotniki G,Denham D.The state stress in the upper part of the Earth' s crust in Australia according to measurements in tunnels and mines and from seismic observation.Investigation of stress in rock-advances in stress measurement.Int.soc.Rock Mech.Symp,1976,Sydney,Australia:71-82.
[32]Stacey T R,Wesseloo J.The in-situ stress regime in Southern Africa.In:Vouille G,Berest P,eds.Proc 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics.Rotterdam:A.A.Balkema,1999,1189-1192.
[33]E.T.Brown,E.Hoek.Technical Note Trends in Relationships between Measured In-Situ Stress and Depth[J].Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech.Abstr,1978,15,211-215.
[34]朱焕春,陶振宇.不同岩石中地应力分布[J].地震学报,1999,16(1):49-63.
[35]Zoback M L.First-and Second-/ Order Patterns of Stress in the Lithosphere:The World Stress Map Project[J].J.Geophys.Res.,1992,(97):11703-11728.
[36]Montone,et al.Active Stress Map of Italy[J],J.Geophys.Res.,1999,104:25595-25610.
[37]Karl Fuchs,Birgit Müller.World Stress Map of the Earth:a key to tectonic processes and technological applications[J].Naturwissenschaften,2001,88:357-371.
[38]McCutchen W R.Some element of a theory for in-situ stress[J].Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci.& Geomech.Abstr.,1982,19:201-203.
[39]Sheory P R.A theory for in-situ stress in isotropic and transversely isotropic rock[J].Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci.& Geomech.Abstr.,1994,31(1):23-34.
[40]陈彭年,陈宏德,高莉青.世界地应力实测资料汇编[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
[41]陈家庚,高龙生.原地应力、岩层原地强度及中国大陆之应力场[J].地震学报,1989,16(2):142-152.
[42]李方全,刘光勋.我国现今地应力状态及有关问题[J].地震学报,1990,(3):156-171.
[43]催效锋,谢富仁.利用震源机制解资料进行应力分区的初步研究[J].地震学报,1999,21(5):513-522.
[44]谢富仁,陈策群,张景发.中国现代构造应力场基本特征与分区,见:中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.北京:地质出版社,2003,39-48.
[45]马宗晋,杜品仁,洪汉净等.地球构造与动力学[M].广东:广东科技出版社,2003.
[46]许志勤.青藏高原大陆动力学[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.
[47]李勇,周荣军.青藏高原东缘大陆动力学过程与地质响应[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.
[48]汪素云.中国及邻区现代构造应力场的数值模拟[J].地球物理学报,1999,23(1):35-45.
[49]许忠淮,石耀霖.岩石圈结构与大陆动力学[J].地震学报,2003,25(5):512-527.
[50]李永林,高旭.喜马拉雅弧边界作用力的变化对中国内陆应力场的影响[J].地震,2000,(20):196-202.
[51]郑中华,陈永顺.中国及周边地区2000 2004年构造应力图[J].地震学报,2006,28(3):323-328.
[52]郑斯华,高原.中国大陆岩石层的应力方位的各向异性[J].地震学报,1994,16(2): 131-140.
[53]谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.
[54]陶振宇、潘别桐.岩石力学理论与方法[M].武汉:中国地质出版社,1991.
[55]陶振宇、杨子文.地应力—岩体性状的一个主要因素[J].水利学报,1982,23(10):38-43.
[56]白世伟,李光煜.二滩水电站坝区岩体应力场研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1982,(1):45-56.
[57]蔡美峰,王双红.地应力状态与围岩性质的关系研究[J].中国矿业,1997,6(6):38-42.
[58]蔡美峰,王双红.地应力状态与围岩性质的关系研究[J].中国矿业,1997,6(6):38-41.
[59]赵奎,蔡美峰.地应力状态与围岩性质关系模糊识别[J].金属矿山,2001,(1):6-8.
[60]陶振宇,张黎明.地应力与地壳岩石强度之间关系的研究[J].水文地质工程地质,1990,6:27-30.
[61]于震平,李铁汉.原位岩体强度与初始应力状态的关[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1998,1(23):65-69.
[62]李铁汉.高地应力梯度与岩体物理场.见:中国岩石力学与工程学会编、面向21世纪的岩石力学与工程,北京:中国科学技术出版社,1996,657-663.
[63]陈志敏.我国不同岩性侧压比随深度变化规律探讨[J].西部探矿工程,2006,(6):99-101.
[64]陶振宇,朱焕春.岩石力学的地质与物理基础[M].武议:中国地质大学出版社,1996.
[65]Savage W Z,Swolfs H S.Tectonic and gravitional stress in long symmetric ridges and valleys[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1986,91:3677-3685.
[66]Amadei B,Pan E.Gravitional stress in anisotropic rock with inclined strata[J].Int.J.Rock.Mech.Min.Sci.& Geomech.Abstr,1992,29:225-236.
[67]朱焕春,陶振宇.论沉积区岩体地应力分布[J].武汉水利电力大学学报,1993,4(26):1-9.
[68]朱焕春.赵海斌.河谷地应力场数值模拟[J].水利学报1996,(5):29-36.
[69]朱焕春,陶振宇.河谷走向与河各地应力分布[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1995,1(14):17-24.
[70]朱焕春,陶振宇.地形地貌与地应力分布的初步分析[J].水利水电技术,1994,(1):29-33.
[71]田中玉,李攀峰.两种典型河谷应力场应力分布特征对比分析[J].地质灾害与环境保 护,2002,3(13):60-63
[72]黄润秋,张卓元.中国西南地壳浅层动力学过程及其工程环境效应研究【M】.成都:四川大学出版社,2001.
[73]黄润秋.中国西部岩石高应力场特征及其卸荷破裂机理[J].工程地质学报,2004,9(3):227-232.
[74]杨林德等,岩土工程问题的反演理论与工程实践.1996,北京:科学出版社.
[75]郭怀志,马启智,薛玺成等.岩体初始应力场的分析方法[J].岩土工程学报,1983,5(3).
[76]张有天,胡惠昌.地应力场的趋势分析[J].水利学报,1984,(4):31-38.
[77]刘允,龚壁新,罗超文等.深钻孔地应力测量和地应力场分析及其应用[J].长江科学院院报,1993,(4):41-49.
[78]蒋中明,徐卫亚.三维初始地应力场反分析的径向基函数法[J].岩土力学,2002,23(6):737-741.
[79]戚蓝,熊开智.灰色理论在地应力场分析中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(10):1547-1550.
[80]孙广亚,蔡美峰.应力函数法在某金矿地应力场反分析中的应用[J].沈阳黄金学院学报,1996,15(3):215-220.
[81]肖明,刘志明.锦屏二级水电站三维地应力场反演回归分析[J].人民长江,31(9):42-44.
[82]丰定祥,谷先荣,杨家岭,等.关于地下工程有限元分析中初始地应力场的假定[J].地下工程,1982,(2):20-27.
[83]赵兵,盛国刚,李宁.位移反分析的有限元法及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(7):1146-1149.
[84]戚蓝.初始地应力场系统分析理论与方法研究[D].天津大学,2003.
[85]蒋中明,徐卫亚,邵建富.基于人工神经网络的初始地应力场三维反分析[J].河海大学学报,2002,30(3).
[86]石郭郭,傅永华.人工神经网络结合遗传算法反演岩体初始地应力场的研究[J].武汉大学学报,2005,38(2):73-76
[87]阎平凡,张长水.人工神经网络与模拟进化计算[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000.
[88]王涛,周先前,田树斌.基于正交设计的河谷地应力场数值模拟方法及应用[J].岩土力学,2003,24(5):831-835.
[89]G.Gioda.Indirect identification of average elastic characteristics of rock masses[C].Pro Int Conf on Structural Foundations on Rock.Sydney,1980,1:65-73.
[90]周思孟,等,复杂岩体若干岩石力学问题[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1998.
[91]于学馥,于加,徐俊.岩石力学新概念与开挖结构优化设计[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.
[92]钱七虎.深部岩体工程响应的特征科学现象及“深部”的界定[J].华东理工学院学报,2002,27(4):21-23.
[93]张建华.破碎围岩条件下开采扰动区LSMA的动力失稳[J].西安科技大学学报,2007,27(4):544-549.
[94]张路青,双孔圆形洞室围岩应力分析的交替法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(5):534-543.
[95]董方庭,宋宏伟,郭志宏等.巷道围岩松动圈支护理论[J].1994,19(1):21-31.
[96]Goodman R.E.,Kieffer D.S.Behavior of rock slopes[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2000,126(8):675-684.
[97]夏熙伦,周火明,盛谦等.三峡工程船闸高边坡岩体松动区及其性状[J].长江科学院院报,1999,16(4):1-5.
[98]Q.Sheng,Z.Q.Yue,C.F.Lee,L.G.Tham,H.Zhou.Estimating the excavation disturbed zone in the slopes of the Three Gorges Project[J].China,Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci.,2002,39:165-1842.
[99]孙世国,催恒忠,冉启发.岩石工程开挖对山坡应力场扰动规律的数值模拟[J].地球与环境,2005,33(3):107-111.
[100]张贯峰,谢永利,张连成.岩质边坡开挖效应的有限元仿真分析[J].昆明理工大学学报-理工版,2006,31(3):5-8.
[101]王夫亮.关于确定围岩松弛区半径及其相关问题的探讨[J].铁道工程学报,1998(2):57-65.
[102]肖世国,周德培.开挖边坡松弛区的确定与数值分析方法[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(3),318-322.
[103]周希圣,宋宏伟.国外围岩松动圈支护理论研究概况[J].建井技术,1994,4(5):67-69.
[104]刘刚,宋宏伟.围岩松动区影响因素的数值模拟[J].冶矿工程,2003,23:1-3.
[105]杨志法.关于位移反分析的某些考虑[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1995,14(3):11-16.
[106]乔兰,蔡美峰.应力解除法在某金矿地应力测量中的新进展[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1995,14(1):25-32.
[107]侯明勋.深部地应力测量新方法新原理及其相关问题研究(D).武汉:中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2004.
[108]蔡美峰.地应力及原位地应力测量,见:中国岩石力学与工程世纪成就[M].王思敬.江 苏:河海大学出版社,2004,485-515.
[109]蔡美峰,乔兰,于劲波.空心包体应变计测量精度问题[J].岩土工程学报,1994,16(6):15-20.
[110]刘允芳,张启舟,龚壁新.岩体应力测量元件模拟标定试验与可靠兴研究[J].长江科学院院报,1988,5(3):41-51.
[111]Haimson B Fairhurst C.Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rock.Soc Pet Eng J 1967:310-318.
[112]F.H.Cornet,B.Valette.In situ stress determination from hydraulic injection test data.Journal of Geophysical Research,Vol.89,No.B13,P:11527-11537.Dec.1984.
[113]刘允芳.水压致裂法三维地应力测量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1991,10(3):246-256.
[114]刘允芳.深圳抽水畜能水电站水压致裂三维地应力测量和分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(增):1205-1210.
[115]F.H.Cornet,Wileveau Y,Bert B,Darcy J.Complete stress determination with the HTPF tool in a mountainous region.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci,1997;34(3/4),paper no.057.
[116]B.C.Haimson,F.H.Cornet.ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation-Part 3:hydraulic fracturing(HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures(HTPF),International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,(2003),40:1011-1020.
[117]陈群策,李方全,毛吉震.水压致裂法三维地应力测量的实用性研究[J].地质力学学报,2001,7(1):69-78.
[118]Zoback M D.Inject ion induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site,Germany[J].Journal 0f Geophysical Research,1997,102(B8):18477-18491.
[119]黄雨蕊,谭延栋.利用钻孔崩落研究中原油田的构造应力场[J].地震学报,1994,16(2):195-203.
[120]刘威,石耀林.非均匀岩石钻孔崩落方位的模拟与研究[J].地震学报,2001,21(2):59-64.
[121]吴大铭,王培德.用SH波和P波振幅比确定震源机制解[J].地震学报,1989,13(3):275-281.
[122]陈励,陈志喜,金衍.用斜井岩芯的声发射效应确定深层地应力[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(3):311-314.
[123]邓金根,黄荣樽,添效山.油田深部地层地应力测定的新方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1997,21(1):32-35.
[124]尹菲.对利用声发射凯塞效应测量地应力技术中几个问题的探讨[J].应用声学,1992,11(1):5-12.
[125]K.Matsuki,N,Kaga.Determination of three dimensional in situ stress from core discing based on analysis of principal tensile stress[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2004,(41),1167-1190.
[126]王文祥,唐方头,杨武洋.深部地应力探测技术理论探讨[J].地球物理学进展,1999,14(3):89-100.
[127]刘允芳.在同一钻孔中水压致裂法地应力测量与套钻孔应力解除法测量成果的比较[J].地震研究,1995,18(1):80-85.
[128]李方全.套芯法、水压致裂法原地应力测量、钻孔崩落及震源机制解分析所得结果的对比[J].地震学报,1992,14(2):149-155.
[129]李方全.对地应力尺寸效应的讨论,见:中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.北京:地质出版社,2003,174-179.
[130]王思敬.中国岩石力学与工程的世纪成就与展望,见:西部大开发中的岩石力学与工程问题,中国岩石力学与工程第八次学术大会论文集,北京:科学出版社,2004,1-9.
[131]钱七虎.非线性岩石力学的新进展-深部岩体力学的若干关键问题,见:西部大开发中的岩石力学与工程问题,中国岩石力学与工程第八次学术大会论文集,北京:科学出版社,2004,10-17.
[132]葛修润,侯明勋.一种测定深部岩体地应力新方法—钻孔局部壁面应力全解除法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(23):3923-3927.
[133]周宏伟,谢和平,左建平.深部高地应力下岩石力学行为研究进展[J].力学进展,2005,35(1):91-99.
[134]刘允芳,罗超文,景锋.水压致裂法三维地应力测量及其修正和工程应用[J].岩土工程学报,1999,21(4):465-470.
[135]罗超文,刘允芳,景锋.水布垭工程地下厂房区三维地应力测试研究[J].长江科学院院报,1999,16(1):45-47.
[136]B.C.Haimson,F.H.Cornet.ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation-Part 3:hydraulic fracturing(HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures(HTPF),International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,(2003),40:1011-1020.
[137]F.H.Cornet,Wileveau Y,Bert B,Darcy J.Complete stress determination with the HTPF tool in a mountainous region.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci,1997,34(3/4),paper no.057.
[138]尹建民,刘元坤,罗超文,刘允芳.原生裂隙水压法三维地应力测量原理及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(增):1706-1709.
[139]刘允芳,韩晓玉,刘元坤.深圳抽水畜能电站水压致裂法三维地应力测量和分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(增):1205-1210.
[140]F.H.Cornet.The HTPF and the integrated stress determination methods.In:Hudson,editor.Comprehensive rock engineering,vol.3.Oxford:Pergamon Press;1993.p:413-432.
[141]刘亚群,李海波,景锋.考虑应力梯度的原生裂隙水压致裂法地应力测量的原理及工程应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1991,10(3):1145-1149
[142]Beasley,D.,Bull,D.R.,Martin,R.R.,1993.An overview of genetic algorithms:Part 1,Fundamentals,University Computing,Vol.15,No.2,pp.58-69,Department of Computing Mathematics,University of Cardiff,UK.
[143]Goldberg,D.E.,1989.Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning.Addison-Wesley.
[144]陈策群,李方全.水利阶撑法用于原地应力测量的工作原理及其工程实践[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(3):305-310
[145]丘元喜.地质力学与板块构造学.北京:地质出版社,2006.
[146]朱志澄.构造地质学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1994.
[147]王鸿祯,莫宣学.中国地质构造述要[J].地质科技,1996,(8):4-9.
[148]任纪舜,郝杰,肖藜薇.回顾与展望:中国大地构造学[J].地质论评,2002,48(2):113-124.
[149]钱祥麟.新生代板内造山作用研究-认识中国区域地质构造基本特征的关键[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2004,11(3):221-225.
[150]程裕淇,沈永和,张良臣.中国大陆地质构造演化[J].中国区域地质,1995,(4):289-294.
[151]李廷栋.中国岩石圈构造单元[J].中国地质,2006,26(4):289-294.
[152]朱介寿,曹家敏,蔡学林等.中国及邻近陆域海域地球内部三维结构及动力学研究[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(4):497-503.
[153]程裕淇.中国区域地质概论[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.
[154]黄忠贤,陈虹.中国大陆地震活动分期及其与构造运动的关系[J].中国地震,1996,12(4):403-410.
[155]汪素云,许忠淮,俞言样.中国及其邻区周围板块用力的研究[J].地球物理学报,1996,39(6):764-771.
[156]徐纪人,赵志新.中国岩石圈应力场与构造运动区域特征[J].中国地质,2006,33(4):782-792.
[157]郭良迁,黄立人.中国大陆地壳的应变应力场研究[J].华北地震科学,2000,3(18):50-58.
[158]陈连旺,杨树新,谢富仁.中国大陆构造应力应变场现今年变化特征的数值模拟[J].中国地震,2005,21(3):341-349.
[159]张培震,王敏,甘卫军.GPS观测的活动断裂滑动速率及其对现今大陆动力作用的制约[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2003,10(S):81-92.
[160]王琪,张培震,马宗晋.中国大陆现今构造变形GPS观测数据与速度场[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2002,9(2):415-429.
[161]安其美,丁立丰,王海忠.福建周宁水电站水压致裂地应力测量及其应用[J].岩土力学,2004,25(10):1672-1676.
[162]尹健民,陈礼伟,钟作武等.某高速公路隧道区水压致裂地应力测量与分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(增):1827-1830.
[163]钟作武,龚壁新,吕国湘.三峡工程地下厂房区域地应力测量与研究[J].长江科学院院报,1996,13(增):17-19.
[164]董诚,王连捷,杨小聪等.安庆铜矿地应力测量[J].地质力学学报,2001,7(3):17-19.
[165]吴满路,廖椿庭.大茅隧道地应力测量及围岩体稳定性研究[J].地质力学学报,2000,6(2):71-76.
[166]蔡美峰,乔兰,于波等.金川二矿区深部地应力测量及其分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(4):414-418.
[167]蔡美峰,陈长臻,彭华.万福煤矿深部水压致裂地应力测量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(5):1069-1074.
[168]吴满路,廖椿庭,张春山等.红透山铜矿地应力测量与分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(23):3943-3947.
[169]郭启良,安其美,赵仕广.水压致裂应力测量在广州抽水蓄能电站设计中的应用研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(6):828-832.
[170]王学潮,郭启良,张辉.青藏高原东北缘水压致裂地应力测量[J].地质力学学报,2000,6(2):64-70.
[171]刘允芳,尹健民,刘元坤 新疆下阪地水利枢纽地应力测量与岩爆究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(2):242-246.
[172]刘亚群,罗超文,李海波.南水北调西线工程区地应力测量及地应力场特征分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(20):3620-3624.
[173]李方全,刘鹏,张钧.原地应力测量对某核废料处置场场地评价的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1993,13(1):55-62.
[174]祁英男,李方全,毛吉震.万家寨水利枢纽水压致裂应力测量结果和分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(2):188-191.
[175]景锋,边智华,杨火平.深埋长隧道地应力测量与岩爆预测分析[J].人民长江,2008,39(1):80-83.
[176]罗超文,刘允芳,景锋.水布垭工程地下厂房区三维地应力测试研究[J].长江科学院院报,1999,16(1):45-47.
[177]肖本职,罗超文,刘元坤.鄂西地应力测量与隧道岩爆预测分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(24):4472-4477.
[178]肖平西,尹健民,景锋.官地水电站地下厂房区地应力测试与应用分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(6):895-898.
[179]尹健民,刘元坤,艾凯.香港排污隧道工程水压致裂法地应力测量研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(6):892-894.
[180]张贻火,景锋,丁仕奇.三维初始地应力场反演与工程应用[J].人民长江,2007,38(1):129-131.
[181]景锋,边智华.铁路线深埋长隧道地应力测试与岩爆预测,四川大学学报,2007(S1):66-72.
[182]乔向阳,刘成,徐冰涛等.巴喀油田地应力研究与应用[J].新疆地质,2001,19(4):300-304.
[183]肖尚斌,张艳君.蒲石河抽水蓄能电站地下厂房地应力特征及岩爆判别[J].东北水利水电,1996,(7):14-16.
[184]肖本职,刘元坤,钟作武.宜万线地应力实测资料分析[J].矿山压力与顶板管理,2005,22(3):92-97.
[185]张顺,林春明,顾连兴.松辽盆地头台油田现代地应力场分布特征研究[J].高校地质学报,2001,7(2):230-236.
[186]曾纪全,雷承第.广-渝高速公路华莹山隧道围岩地应力测试与岩爆研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(11):1696-1701.
[187]陈群策,毛吉震,侯砚和.利用地应力实测数据讨论地形对地应力的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(23):3990-3995.
[188]寇焕英.引黄入晋工程总干线一级泵站地应力分析[J].海河水利,2001,(1):16-18.
[189]李庶林,杨念哥.凡口铅锌矿深部矿床地应力测试[J].矿业研究与开发,2003,23(4):15-17.
[190]李莉,何江达,林正伟.糯扎渡水电站地下厂房初始地应力场研究[J].红水河,22(4):28-32.
[191]赵德安,陈志敏,蔡小林等.我国地应力场分布规律统计分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(6):1265-1271.
[192]岩石力学参数手册[M].水利水电科学研究院,水利水电出版社,1991.
[193]袁风波,刘建,李蒲健.拉西瓦工程河谷区高地应力场反演与形成机理[J].岩土力学,2007,28(4):836-842.
[194]葛洪魁,林英松.油田地应力分布规律[J].断块油气田,1998,5(5):1-5.
[195]李行船,马宗晋,曲国胜.分层地应力描述及其在胜利油田的应用[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(6):8-17.
[196]梅应堂.长江三峡工程地区构造变动发展及演化特征[J].人民长江,1992,33(11):1-3.
[197]陈德基.长江三峡工程地质研究综述[J].人民长江,1993,34(8):16-20.
[198]李同录.长江三峡地区区域地壳稳定性评价[J].西安地质学院学报,1991,13(1):48-58.
[199]陈永成,高士钧,王清云.长江三峡地区新生代以来地壳应力场的基本特征[J].华南地震,1996,16(4):61-67.
[200]刘允芳,龚壁新,钟作武.三峡工程船闸区地应力场初探[J].长江科学院院报,1999,29:76-82.
[201]龚壁新,钟作武,罗超文.三峡工程船闸区地应力测量和地应力场初步分析[J].长江科学院院报,1995,12(2):63-67.
[202]刘允芳,肖本职.三峡水利枢纽船闸区地应力场初步分析[J].长江科学院院报,1989,2:22-35.
[203]王春山,吴山,吴德超.石棉县大岗山水电站坝区断裂地质特征[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(4):80-86.
[204]中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院.四川大渡河大岗山水电站可行性研究报告.2006,8.
[205]四川省地震局工程地震研究院,中国地震局地质研究所,中国地震局地球物理研究所.大渡河大岗山水电站工程场地地震安全性评价报告.2004,10.
[206]中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院,中国地震局地壳应力研究所.四川大渡河大岗山水电站可行性研究报告:3工程地质,附件11坝区水压致裂地应力测试、高 压压水试验及地应力场回归分析研究.2005,12.
[207]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所.地下厂房洞室群地质结构模型研究(Ⅰ).2008,8.
[208]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所.大岗山水电站地下厂房区域地应力场分布特征与反演分析研究报告.2008,8.
[209]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所.大渡河大岗山水电站地下厂房洞室群围岩开挖损伤演化规律预演分析.2008,8.
[210]徐则民,黄润秋.沟谷的隧道效应[J].水文地质工程地质,2004,(4):12-16.
[211]肖世国.岩石高边坡开挖松驰区及加固支挡结构研究(D).成都:西南交通大学,2003.
[212]盛谦.深挖岩质边坡开挖扰动区与工程岩体力学性状研究(D).武汉:中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2002.
[2]于学馥,郑颖人,刘怀恒等.地下工程围岩稳定分析[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1983.
[3]蔡美峰.地应力测量原理和技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
[4]刘允芳,罗超文,盛谦.岩体与地应力建设[M].湖北科学技术出版社,2000.9.
[5]陶振宇,潘别桐.岩石力学理论与方法[M].武汉:中国地质出版社,1991.
[6]谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.
[7]许忠淮.地应力研究现状与展望[J].学科发展与研究,1990(5):27-34.
[8]谢富仁,崔效锋,张景发.中国现代构造应力场基本特征与分区[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.
[9]蔡美峰.地应力及原位地应力测量,见:中国岩石力学与工程世纪成就[M].王思敬.江苏:河海大学出版社,2004,485-515.
[10]李方全,廖椿庭.地应力测量实例.地质科技,1973(3):67-73.
[11]Zoback M.l.,Zoback M.D.,Adams J.,et.al.Global patterns of tectonic stress.Nature,1989,341:291-298.
[12]王连捷 潘立宙 廖椿庭.地应力测量及其在工程中的应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
[13]Haimson B Fairhurst C.Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rock [J].Soc Pet Eng,1967:310-318.
[14]Richardson R.M.,Solomon S.C.,Sleep N.H.Tectonic stress in the plates[J].Rev Geophys Phys,1979,17:981-1019
[15]C.Fairhurst.Stress estimation in rock:a brief history and review[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2003,(40):957-973.
[16]C.Ljunggren,Yanting Chang,T.Janson.An overview of rock stress measurement methods[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2003,(40),975-989.
[17]Zoback M L.Injection induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site,Germany[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1997,102(B8):18477-18491.
[18]F.Tonon,B.Amadei.Stress in anisotropic rock masses:an engineering perspective building on geological knowledge[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2003,(40),1099-1120.
[19]苏生瑞,黄润秋,王士天.断裂构造对地应力场的影响及其工程应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
[20]王连捷,任希飞,丁原辰.地应力测量在采矿工程中的应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1994.
[21]裴伟.地壳应力状态.国家地震局地震大队情报资料室译[M].北京:地震出版社,1978.
[22]蔡美峰.岩石力学与工程[M].北京:科学技术出版社,2002.
[23]万天丰.古构造应力场[M].北京:地质出版社,1988.
[24]失焕春,李浩.论岩体构造应力[J].水利学报,2001,(9):81-85.
[25]许忠淮.岩石层应力场[J].地震地磁观测与研究,1997,18(1):18-37.
[26]C.Lithgow-Bertelloni,J.H.Guynn.岩石层应力场的起源(一)[J].世界地震译丛,2005,1:77-89.
[27]C.Lithgow-Bertelloni,J.H.Guynn.岩石层应力场的起源(二)[J].世界地震译丛,2005,2:74-83.
[28]C.Lithgow-Bertelloni,J.H.Guynn.岩石层应力场的起源(三)[J].世界地震译丛,2005,3:68-84.
[29]Hast N.The state of stress in upper part of earth' s crust.Tectonophysic,1969,8:169-211.
[30]Hamson,B.c.The hydrofracluring Stress measuring technique method and rcent fieldresults in U.S.Proe.international society of Mechancs Symposium on Investigation of Stress in Rock Advances in Stress Measurement,1976,Sydney.
[31]Worotniki G,Denham D.The state stress in the upper part of the Earth' s crust in Australia according to measurements in tunnels and mines and from seismic observation.Investigation of stress in rock-advances in stress measurement.Int.soc.Rock Mech.Symp,1976,Sydney,Australia:71-82.
[32]Stacey T R,Wesseloo J.The in-situ stress regime in Southern Africa.In:Vouille G,Berest P,eds.Proc 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics.Rotterdam:A.A.Balkema,1999,1189-1192.
[33]E.T.Brown,E.Hoek.Technical Note Trends in Relationships between Measured In-Situ Stress and Depth[J].Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech.Abstr,1978,15,211-215.
[34]朱焕春,陶振宇.不同岩石中地应力分布[J].地震学报,1999,16(1):49-63.
[35]Zoback M L.First-and Second-/ Order Patterns of Stress in the Lithosphere:The World Stress Map Project[J].J.Geophys.Res.,1992,(97):11703-11728.
[36]Montone,et al.Active Stress Map of Italy[J],J.Geophys.Res.,1999,104:25595-25610.
[37]Karl Fuchs,Birgit Müller.World Stress Map of the Earth:a key to tectonic processes and technological applications[J].Naturwissenschaften,2001,88:357-371.
[38]McCutchen W R.Some element of a theory for in-situ stress[J].Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci.& Geomech.Abstr.,1982,19:201-203.
[39]Sheory P R.A theory for in-situ stress in isotropic and transversely isotropic rock[J].Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci.& Geomech.Abstr.,1994,31(1):23-34.
[40]陈彭年,陈宏德,高莉青.世界地应力实测资料汇编[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
[41]陈家庚,高龙生.原地应力、岩层原地强度及中国大陆之应力场[J].地震学报,1989,16(2):142-152.
[42]李方全,刘光勋.我国现今地应力状态及有关问题[J].地震学报,1990,(3):156-171.
[43]催效锋,谢富仁.利用震源机制解资料进行应力分区的初步研究[J].地震学报,1999,21(5):513-522.
[44]谢富仁,陈策群,张景发.中国现代构造应力场基本特征与分区,见:中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.北京:地质出版社,2003,39-48.
[45]马宗晋,杜品仁,洪汉净等.地球构造与动力学[M].广东:广东科技出版社,2003.
[46]许志勤.青藏高原大陆动力学[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.
[47]李勇,周荣军.青藏高原东缘大陆动力学过程与地质响应[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.
[48]汪素云.中国及邻区现代构造应力场的数值模拟[J].地球物理学报,1999,23(1):35-45.
[49]许忠淮,石耀霖.岩石圈结构与大陆动力学[J].地震学报,2003,25(5):512-527.
[50]李永林,高旭.喜马拉雅弧边界作用力的变化对中国内陆应力场的影响[J].地震,2000,(20):196-202.
[51]郑中华,陈永顺.中国及周边地区2000 2004年构造应力图[J].地震学报,2006,28(3):323-328.
[52]郑斯华,高原.中国大陆岩石层的应力方位的各向异性[J].地震学报,1994,16(2): 131-140.
[53]谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.
[54]陶振宇、潘别桐.岩石力学理论与方法[M].武汉:中国地质出版社,1991.
[55]陶振宇、杨子文.地应力—岩体性状的一个主要因素[J].水利学报,1982,23(10):38-43.
[56]白世伟,李光煜.二滩水电站坝区岩体应力场研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1982,(1):45-56.
[57]蔡美峰,王双红.地应力状态与围岩性质的关系研究[J].中国矿业,1997,6(6):38-42.
[58]蔡美峰,王双红.地应力状态与围岩性质的关系研究[J].中国矿业,1997,6(6):38-41.
[59]赵奎,蔡美峰.地应力状态与围岩性质关系模糊识别[J].金属矿山,2001,(1):6-8.
[60]陶振宇,张黎明.地应力与地壳岩石强度之间关系的研究[J].水文地质工程地质,1990,6:27-30.
[61]于震平,李铁汉.原位岩体强度与初始应力状态的关[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,1998,1(23):65-69.
[62]李铁汉.高地应力梯度与岩体物理场.见:中国岩石力学与工程学会编、面向21世纪的岩石力学与工程,北京:中国科学技术出版社,1996,657-663.
[63]陈志敏.我国不同岩性侧压比随深度变化规律探讨[J].西部探矿工程,2006,(6):99-101.
[64]陶振宇,朱焕春.岩石力学的地质与物理基础[M].武议:中国地质大学出版社,1996.
[65]Savage W Z,Swolfs H S.Tectonic and gravitional stress in long symmetric ridges and valleys[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1986,91:3677-3685.
[66]Amadei B,Pan E.Gravitional stress in anisotropic rock with inclined strata[J].Int.J.Rock.Mech.Min.Sci.& Geomech.Abstr,1992,29:225-236.
[67]朱焕春,陶振宇.论沉积区岩体地应力分布[J].武汉水利电力大学学报,1993,4(26):1-9.
[68]朱焕春.赵海斌.河谷地应力场数值模拟[J].水利学报1996,(5):29-36.
[69]朱焕春,陶振宇.河谷走向与河各地应力分布[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1995,1(14):17-24.
[70]朱焕春,陶振宇.地形地貌与地应力分布的初步分析[J].水利水电技术,1994,(1):29-33.
[71]田中玉,李攀峰.两种典型河谷应力场应力分布特征对比分析[J].地质灾害与环境保 护,2002,3(13):60-63
[72]黄润秋,张卓元.中国西南地壳浅层动力学过程及其工程环境效应研究【M】.成都:四川大学出版社,2001.
[73]黄润秋.中国西部岩石高应力场特征及其卸荷破裂机理[J].工程地质学报,2004,9(3):227-232.
[74]杨林德等,岩土工程问题的反演理论与工程实践.1996,北京:科学出版社.
[75]郭怀志,马启智,薛玺成等.岩体初始应力场的分析方法[J].岩土工程学报,1983,5(3).
[76]张有天,胡惠昌.地应力场的趋势分析[J].水利学报,1984,(4):31-38.
[77]刘允,龚壁新,罗超文等.深钻孔地应力测量和地应力场分析及其应用[J].长江科学院院报,1993,(4):41-49.
[78]蒋中明,徐卫亚.三维初始地应力场反分析的径向基函数法[J].岩土力学,2002,23(6):737-741.
[79]戚蓝,熊开智.灰色理论在地应力场分析中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(10):1547-1550.
[80]孙广亚,蔡美峰.应力函数法在某金矿地应力场反分析中的应用[J].沈阳黄金学院学报,1996,15(3):215-220.
[81]肖明,刘志明.锦屏二级水电站三维地应力场反演回归分析[J].人民长江,31(9):42-44.
[82]丰定祥,谷先荣,杨家岭,等.关于地下工程有限元分析中初始地应力场的假定[J].地下工程,1982,(2):20-27.
[83]赵兵,盛国刚,李宁.位移反分析的有限元法及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(7):1146-1149.
[84]戚蓝.初始地应力场系统分析理论与方法研究[D].天津大学,2003.
[85]蒋中明,徐卫亚,邵建富.基于人工神经网络的初始地应力场三维反分析[J].河海大学学报,2002,30(3).
[86]石郭郭,傅永华.人工神经网络结合遗传算法反演岩体初始地应力场的研究[J].武汉大学学报,2005,38(2):73-76
[87]阎平凡,张长水.人工神经网络与模拟进化计算[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000.
[88]王涛,周先前,田树斌.基于正交设计的河谷地应力场数值模拟方法及应用[J].岩土力学,2003,24(5):831-835.
[89]G.Gioda.Indirect identification of average elastic characteristics of rock masses[C].Pro Int Conf on Structural Foundations on Rock.Sydney,1980,1:65-73.
[90]周思孟,等,复杂岩体若干岩石力学问题[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1998.
[91]于学馥,于加,徐俊.岩石力学新概念与开挖结构优化设计[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.
[92]钱七虎.深部岩体工程响应的特征科学现象及“深部”的界定[J].华东理工学院学报,2002,27(4):21-23.
[93]张建华.破碎围岩条件下开采扰动区LSMA的动力失稳[J].西安科技大学学报,2007,27(4):544-549.
[94]张路青,双孔圆形洞室围岩应力分析的交替法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(5):534-543.
[95]董方庭,宋宏伟,郭志宏等.巷道围岩松动圈支护理论[J].1994,19(1):21-31.
[96]Goodman R.E.,Kieffer D.S.Behavior of rock slopes[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2000,126(8):675-684.
[97]夏熙伦,周火明,盛谦等.三峡工程船闸高边坡岩体松动区及其性状[J].长江科学院院报,1999,16(4):1-5.
[98]Q.Sheng,Z.Q.Yue,C.F.Lee,L.G.Tham,H.Zhou.Estimating the excavation disturbed zone in the slopes of the Three Gorges Project[J].China,Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci.,2002,39:165-1842.
[99]孙世国,催恒忠,冉启发.岩石工程开挖对山坡应力场扰动规律的数值模拟[J].地球与环境,2005,33(3):107-111.
[100]张贯峰,谢永利,张连成.岩质边坡开挖效应的有限元仿真分析[J].昆明理工大学学报-理工版,2006,31(3):5-8.
[101]王夫亮.关于确定围岩松弛区半径及其相关问题的探讨[J].铁道工程学报,1998(2):57-65.
[102]肖世国,周德培.开挖边坡松弛区的确定与数值分析方法[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(3),318-322.
[103]周希圣,宋宏伟.国外围岩松动圈支护理论研究概况[J].建井技术,1994,4(5):67-69.
[104]刘刚,宋宏伟.围岩松动区影响因素的数值模拟[J].冶矿工程,2003,23:1-3.
[105]杨志法.关于位移反分析的某些考虑[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1995,14(3):11-16.
[106]乔兰,蔡美峰.应力解除法在某金矿地应力测量中的新进展[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1995,14(1):25-32.
[107]侯明勋.深部地应力测量新方法新原理及其相关问题研究(D).武汉:中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2004.
[108]蔡美峰.地应力及原位地应力测量,见:中国岩石力学与工程世纪成就[M].王思敬.江 苏:河海大学出版社,2004,485-515.
[109]蔡美峰,乔兰,于劲波.空心包体应变计测量精度问题[J].岩土工程学报,1994,16(6):15-20.
[110]刘允芳,张启舟,龚壁新.岩体应力测量元件模拟标定试验与可靠兴研究[J].长江科学院院报,1988,5(3):41-51.
[111]Haimson B Fairhurst C.Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rock.Soc Pet Eng J 1967:310-318.
[112]F.H.Cornet,B.Valette.In situ stress determination from hydraulic injection test data.Journal of Geophysical Research,Vol.89,No.B13,P:11527-11537.Dec.1984.
[113]刘允芳.水压致裂法三维地应力测量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1991,10(3):246-256.
[114]刘允芳.深圳抽水畜能水电站水压致裂三维地应力测量和分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(增):1205-1210.
[115]F.H.Cornet,Wileveau Y,Bert B,Darcy J.Complete stress determination with the HTPF tool in a mountainous region.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci,1997;34(3/4),paper no.057.
[116]B.C.Haimson,F.H.Cornet.ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation-Part 3:hydraulic fracturing(HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures(HTPF),International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,(2003),40:1011-1020.
[117]陈群策,李方全,毛吉震.水压致裂法三维地应力测量的实用性研究[J].地质力学学报,2001,7(1):69-78.
[118]Zoback M D.Inject ion induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site,Germany[J].Journal 0f Geophysical Research,1997,102(B8):18477-18491.
[119]黄雨蕊,谭延栋.利用钻孔崩落研究中原油田的构造应力场[J].地震学报,1994,16(2):195-203.
[120]刘威,石耀林.非均匀岩石钻孔崩落方位的模拟与研究[J].地震学报,2001,21(2):59-64.
[121]吴大铭,王培德.用SH波和P波振幅比确定震源机制解[J].地震学报,1989,13(3):275-281.
[122]陈励,陈志喜,金衍.用斜井岩芯的声发射效应确定深层地应力[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(3):311-314.
[123]邓金根,黄荣樽,添效山.油田深部地层地应力测定的新方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1997,21(1):32-35.
[124]尹菲.对利用声发射凯塞效应测量地应力技术中几个问题的探讨[J].应用声学,1992,11(1):5-12.
[125]K.Matsuki,N,Kaga.Determination of three dimensional in situ stress from core discing based on analysis of principal tensile stress[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2004,(41),1167-1190.
[126]王文祥,唐方头,杨武洋.深部地应力探测技术理论探讨[J].地球物理学进展,1999,14(3):89-100.
[127]刘允芳.在同一钻孔中水压致裂法地应力测量与套钻孔应力解除法测量成果的比较[J].地震研究,1995,18(1):80-85.
[128]李方全.套芯法、水压致裂法原地应力测量、钻孔崩落及震源机制解分析所得结果的对比[J].地震学报,1992,14(2):149-155.
[129]李方全.对地应力尺寸效应的讨论,见:中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M].谢富仁,陈策群,催效锋等.北京:地质出版社,2003,174-179.
[130]王思敬.中国岩石力学与工程的世纪成就与展望,见:西部大开发中的岩石力学与工程问题,中国岩石力学与工程第八次学术大会论文集,北京:科学出版社,2004,1-9.
[131]钱七虎.非线性岩石力学的新进展-深部岩体力学的若干关键问题,见:西部大开发中的岩石力学与工程问题,中国岩石力学与工程第八次学术大会论文集,北京:科学出版社,2004,10-17.
[132]葛修润,侯明勋.一种测定深部岩体地应力新方法—钻孔局部壁面应力全解除法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(23):3923-3927.
[133]周宏伟,谢和平,左建平.深部高地应力下岩石力学行为研究进展[J].力学进展,2005,35(1):91-99.
[134]刘允芳,罗超文,景锋.水压致裂法三维地应力测量及其修正和工程应用[J].岩土工程学报,1999,21(4):465-470.
[135]罗超文,刘允芳,景锋.水布垭工程地下厂房区三维地应力测试研究[J].长江科学院院报,1999,16(1):45-47.
[136]B.C.Haimson,F.H.Cornet.ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation-Part 3:hydraulic fracturing(HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures(HTPF),International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,(2003),40:1011-1020.
[137]F.H.Cornet,Wileveau Y,Bert B,Darcy J.Complete stress determination with the HTPF tool in a mountainous region.Int J Rock Mech Min Sci,1997,34(3/4),paper no.057.
[138]尹建民,刘元坤,罗超文,刘允芳.原生裂隙水压法三维地应力测量原理及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(增):1706-1709.
[139]刘允芳,韩晓玉,刘元坤.深圳抽水畜能电站水压致裂法三维地应力测量和分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(增):1205-1210.
[140]F.H.Cornet.The HTPF and the integrated stress determination methods.In:Hudson,editor.Comprehensive rock engineering,vol.3.Oxford:Pergamon Press;1993.p:413-432.
[141]刘亚群,李海波,景锋.考虑应力梯度的原生裂隙水压致裂法地应力测量的原理及工程应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1991,10(3):1145-1149
[142]Beasley,D.,Bull,D.R.,Martin,R.R.,1993.An overview of genetic algorithms:Part 1,Fundamentals,University Computing,Vol.15,No.2,pp.58-69,Department of Computing Mathematics,University of Cardiff,UK.
[143]Goldberg,D.E.,1989.Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning.Addison-Wesley.
[144]陈策群,李方全.水利阶撑法用于原地应力测量的工作原理及其工程实践[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(3):305-310
[145]丘元喜.地质力学与板块构造学.北京:地质出版社,2006.
[146]朱志澄.构造地质学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1994.
[147]王鸿祯,莫宣学.中国地质构造述要[J].地质科技,1996,(8):4-9.
[148]任纪舜,郝杰,肖藜薇.回顾与展望:中国大地构造学[J].地质论评,2002,48(2):113-124.
[149]钱祥麟.新生代板内造山作用研究-认识中国区域地质构造基本特征的关键[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2004,11(3):221-225.
[150]程裕淇,沈永和,张良臣.中国大陆地质构造演化[J].中国区域地质,1995,(4):289-294.
[151]李廷栋.中国岩石圈构造单元[J].中国地质,2006,26(4):289-294.
[152]朱介寿,曹家敏,蔡学林等.中国及邻近陆域海域地球内部三维结构及动力学研究[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(4):497-503.
[153]程裕淇.中国区域地质概论[M].北京:地质出版社,1994.
[154]黄忠贤,陈虹.中国大陆地震活动分期及其与构造运动的关系[J].中国地震,1996,12(4):403-410.
[155]汪素云,许忠淮,俞言样.中国及其邻区周围板块用力的研究[J].地球物理学报,1996,39(6):764-771.
[156]徐纪人,赵志新.中国岩石圈应力场与构造运动区域特征[J].中国地质,2006,33(4):782-792.
[157]郭良迁,黄立人.中国大陆地壳的应变应力场研究[J].华北地震科学,2000,3(18):50-58.
[158]陈连旺,杨树新,谢富仁.中国大陆构造应力应变场现今年变化特征的数值模拟[J].中国地震,2005,21(3):341-349.
[159]张培震,王敏,甘卫军.GPS观测的活动断裂滑动速率及其对现今大陆动力作用的制约[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2003,10(S):81-92.
[160]王琪,张培震,马宗晋.中国大陆现今构造变形GPS观测数据与速度场[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),2002,9(2):415-429.
[161]安其美,丁立丰,王海忠.福建周宁水电站水压致裂地应力测量及其应用[J].岩土力学,2004,25(10):1672-1676.
[162]尹健民,陈礼伟,钟作武等.某高速公路隧道区水压致裂地应力测量与分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(增):1827-1830.
[163]钟作武,龚壁新,吕国湘.三峡工程地下厂房区域地应力测量与研究[J].长江科学院院报,1996,13(增):17-19.
[164]董诚,王连捷,杨小聪等.安庆铜矿地应力测量[J].地质力学学报,2001,7(3):17-19.
[165]吴满路,廖椿庭.大茅隧道地应力测量及围岩体稳定性研究[J].地质力学学报,2000,6(2):71-76.
[166]蔡美峰,乔兰,于波等.金川二矿区深部地应力测量及其分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(4):414-418.
[167]蔡美峰,陈长臻,彭华.万福煤矿深部水压致裂地应力测量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(5):1069-1074.
[168]吴满路,廖椿庭,张春山等.红透山铜矿地应力测量与分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(23):3943-3947.
[169]郭启良,安其美,赵仕广.水压致裂应力测量在广州抽水蓄能电站设计中的应用研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(6):828-832.
[170]王学潮,郭启良,张辉.青藏高原东北缘水压致裂地应力测量[J].地质力学学报,2000,6(2):64-70.
[171]刘允芳,尹健民,刘元坤 新疆下阪地水利枢纽地应力测量与岩爆究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(2):242-246.
[172]刘亚群,罗超文,李海波.南水北调西线工程区地应力测量及地应力场特征分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(20):3620-3624.
[173]李方全,刘鹏,张钧.原地应力测量对某核废料处置场场地评价的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1993,13(1):55-62.
[174]祁英男,李方全,毛吉震.万家寨水利枢纽水压致裂应力测量结果和分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(2):188-191.
[175]景锋,边智华,杨火平.深埋长隧道地应力测量与岩爆预测分析[J].人民长江,2008,39(1):80-83.
[176]罗超文,刘允芳,景锋.水布垭工程地下厂房区三维地应力测试研究[J].长江科学院院报,1999,16(1):45-47.
[177]肖本职,罗超文,刘元坤.鄂西地应力测量与隧道岩爆预测分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(24):4472-4477.
[178]肖平西,尹健民,景锋.官地水电站地下厂房区地应力测试与应用分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(6):895-898.
[179]尹健民,刘元坤,艾凯.香港排污隧道工程水压致裂法地应力测量研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(6):892-894.
[180]张贻火,景锋,丁仕奇.三维初始地应力场反演与工程应用[J].人民长江,2007,38(1):129-131.
[181]景锋,边智华.铁路线深埋长隧道地应力测试与岩爆预测,四川大学学报,2007(S1):66-72.
[182]乔向阳,刘成,徐冰涛等.巴喀油田地应力研究与应用[J].新疆地质,2001,19(4):300-304.
[183]肖尚斌,张艳君.蒲石河抽水蓄能电站地下厂房地应力特征及岩爆判别[J].东北水利水电,1996,(7):14-16.
[184]肖本职,刘元坤,钟作武.宜万线地应力实测资料分析[J].矿山压力与顶板管理,2005,22(3):92-97.
[185]张顺,林春明,顾连兴.松辽盆地头台油田现代地应力场分布特征研究[J].高校地质学报,2001,7(2):230-236.
[186]曾纪全,雷承第.广-渝高速公路华莹山隧道围岩地应力测试与岩爆研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(11):1696-1701.
[187]陈群策,毛吉震,侯砚和.利用地应力实测数据讨论地形对地应力的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(23):3990-3995.
[188]寇焕英.引黄入晋工程总干线一级泵站地应力分析[J].海河水利,2001,(1):16-18.
[189]李庶林,杨念哥.凡口铅锌矿深部矿床地应力测试[J].矿业研究与开发,2003,23(4):15-17.
[190]李莉,何江达,林正伟.糯扎渡水电站地下厂房初始地应力场研究[J].红水河,22(4):28-32.
[191]赵德安,陈志敏,蔡小林等.我国地应力场分布规律统计分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(6):1265-1271.
[192]岩石力学参数手册[M].水利水电科学研究院,水利水电出版社,1991.
[193]袁风波,刘建,李蒲健.拉西瓦工程河谷区高地应力场反演与形成机理[J].岩土力学,2007,28(4):836-842.
[194]葛洪魁,林英松.油田地应力分布规律[J].断块油气田,1998,5(5):1-5.
[195]李行船,马宗晋,曲国胜.分层地应力描述及其在胜利油田的应用[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(6):8-17.
[196]梅应堂.长江三峡工程地区构造变动发展及演化特征[J].人民长江,1992,33(11):1-3.
[197]陈德基.长江三峡工程地质研究综述[J].人民长江,1993,34(8):16-20.
[198]李同录.长江三峡地区区域地壳稳定性评价[J].西安地质学院学报,1991,13(1):48-58.
[199]陈永成,高士钧,王清云.长江三峡地区新生代以来地壳应力场的基本特征[J].华南地震,1996,16(4):61-67.
[200]刘允芳,龚壁新,钟作武.三峡工程船闸区地应力场初探[J].长江科学院院报,1999,29:76-82.
[201]龚壁新,钟作武,罗超文.三峡工程船闸区地应力测量和地应力场初步分析[J].长江科学院院报,1995,12(2):63-67.
[202]刘允芳,肖本职.三峡水利枢纽船闸区地应力场初步分析[J].长江科学院院报,1989,2:22-35.
[203]王春山,吴山,吴德超.石棉县大岗山水电站坝区断裂地质特征[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(4):80-86.
[204]中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院.四川大渡河大岗山水电站可行性研究报告.2006,8.
[205]四川省地震局工程地震研究院,中国地震局地质研究所,中国地震局地球物理研究所.大渡河大岗山水电站工程场地地震安全性评价报告.2004,10.
[206]中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院,中国地震局地壳应力研究所.四川大渡河大岗山水电站可行性研究报告:3工程地质,附件11坝区水压致裂地应力测试、高 压压水试验及地应力场回归分析研究.2005,12.
[207]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所.地下厂房洞室群地质结构模型研究(Ⅰ).2008,8.
[208]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所.大岗山水电站地下厂房区域地应力场分布特征与反演分析研究报告.2008,8.
[209]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所.大渡河大岗山水电站地下厂房洞室群围岩开挖损伤演化规律预演分析.2008,8.
[210]徐则民,黄润秋.沟谷的隧道效应[J].水文地质工程地质,2004,(4):12-16.
[211]肖世国.岩石高边坡开挖松驰区及加固支挡结构研究(D).成都:西南交通大学,2003.
[212]盛谦.深挖岩质边坡开挖扰动区与工程岩体力学性状研究(D).武汉:中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2002.