廉租房制度实践中的制约因素研究
|
摘要
改革开放以来随着经济社会转型,中国不同收入阶层群体在物质利益分配上呈现出财产、收入分配的金字塔状况。随着社会财富的增加,房价持续走高,高低收入群体对住房的消费能力相背而行。关注民生,促进经济社会和谐发展,廉租房制度作为解决低收入者住房问题成为社会关注的焦点。
本研究拟立足于制度分析的理论视角,运用社会学定量分析与质性分析相结合的研究方法,通过对低收入群体与住房保障局工作人员的问卷调查与个案访谈,以及其他地区的廉租房制度实践情况资料的了解,全面、系统、深入地分析当前廉租房制度实践现状、问题和廉租房制度实践的制约因素与廉租房制度实施效果之间的内在逻辑关系,构建一套具有一定政策咨询意义的能惠及低收入群体的政策方案,建立更为科学、更加实效的廉租住房保障制度。
本文建立在以下三个假设之上:1、经济因素影响廉租房制度实施效果。由于城市低收入人口数量众多,缺乏社会资源,可支配收入增长赶不上消费支出增长速度。而已有的住房公积金和经济适用房政策收益群体本质上排除低收入群体在外,廉租住房需求量极大。而廉租住房保障在当前的发展的中部城市经济社会背景下的资源投入力度又缺乏力度,导致廉租住房保障制度的推进面临较大的社会经济性压力,从而影响廉租房制度的实施效果。2、体制因素影响廉租房制度实施效果。在现行的压力型体制下,廉租住房保障制度在当前政府的任务序列中处于被边缘化的位置,政府的重视程度、配套法律法规的健全程度和保障力度、第三部门的支持程度,都影响着廉租房住房保障制度实施效果。3、社会认知影响廉租房制度实施效果。社会资本和人力资本匮乏的城市低收入群体对廉租住房保障话语体系的认识和对自身利益进行申诉的能力,以及城市居民对低收入者的态度和看法,影响着廉租住房保障制度的实施效果。
通过研究得出以下三个基本结论:(1)经济因素是影响廉租房制度实施效果的重要制约因素。巨大的社会需求与有限投入供给之间形成较大的现实矛盾,共同制约着廉租房制度实施效果。(2)体制因素是影响廉租房制度实施效果的重要制约因素。在当前的压力型体制下,地方政府往往从绩效评估角度考虑,把廉租房制度建设与实施作为绩效评估中的筹码,对中央廉租房政策进行随意变通以求在绩效评估中胜出,甚至刻意消减廉租房建设,控制廉租房入住率,从而造成廉租房制度实施效果不理想的局面。(3)社会认知因素是影响廉租房制度实施效果的重要制约因素。虽然低收入群体逐步能够理性分析廉租房对人们社会生活的作用功效,但是人们权利意识较弱、对廉租房制度的了解程度低、对政府制度信任程度较低等因素,都在一定程度上导致了社会对廉租房制度的认知弱化,进而造成了廉租房制度实施效果弱化。
为了有效提升廉租房制度实践对低收入群体住房保障的效果,促进社会稳定和谐发展,本文从以下几个方面问题进行了讨论:一是关于廉租房保障对象的科学确定问题的讨论;二是关于政府在廉租房制度实施中的主体作用问题的讨论;三是关于廉租房制度的法律保障问题的讨论;四是关于廉租房融资的问题的讨论;五是关于廉租房配套管理和服务的问题的讨论。
Since reform and opening up with the economic and social transformation,groups of different income groups in China have shown a situation like the pyramid of the property,the income distribution in the distribution of material interests.With the increase of social wealth and house prices,high and low income groups are going against the spending power of their housing.Concerned about people's livelihood,and promoting the harmonious development of social economy,the low-rent housing system becomes a focus of concern to solve the problem of low income people's housing.
From the theoretical perspective of the Institutional Analysis,with the research methods of quantitative analysis about sociology with a combination of qualitative analysis,by the questionnaire and interview cases of low-income groups and housing staff of the Security Bureau,as well as the understanding of the practice of low-rent housing system in other areas,this thesis aims to make a comprehensive,systematic and deep analysis of the status quo of low-rent housing system,and the internal relationship between the constraints about and the effect of the practice of low-rent housing system in order to construct a policy advisory group with a certain significance for the low-income groups who can benefit from the policy,and establish a more scientific and more effective protection for the low-rent housing system.This thesis is based on the following three assumptions.Firstly,economic factors affect the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Due to the large number of low-income urban population,and the lack of social resources,the growth in disposable income can not keep up with the growth rate of consumer spending.Besides,the low-income groups are essentially excluded from the existing housing fund and the affordable housing policy,leading to a great demand for low-rent housing.Low-cost housing security in the current development of the central city of economic and social resources is in the context of the lack of input intensity,resulting in the greater socio-economic pressure to promote low-cost housing security system. Secondly,the institutional factors affect the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Under the current system of pressure-type,low-rent housing system to protect the government's task in the current sequence is in a marginalized position.Government's attention,supporting the robustness of the laws and regulations and safeguards,and the third sector to support the level of low-cost housing are affecting the practice of housing security system.Thirdly,the social cognition affects the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Social capital and human capital-poor low-income groups in cities of low-rent housing system for the protection of discourse awareness and self-interest of the complainant's ability to carry out,and the attitudes and perceptions of low-income urban residents can affect the promotion of low-cost housing security system.
In this thesis,the following three basic conclusions are listed.Firstly, economic factors are the important constraints affecting the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Great social demand and limited supply in the reality between the larger contradictions commonly constrain the effect practice of low-rent housing system.Secondly, institutional factors are the important constraints affecting the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Under the type of pressure in the current system,the local government often from the point of view of the performance evaluation,the low-rent housing system and practice of performance evaluation as a bargaining chip in the central low-cost housing policy in order to free alternative performance assessment in the win,and even deliberately reduce the low-cost housing construction,the control room to stay low-cost rate,resulting in the practice of low-rent housing system is not satisfied with the situation.Thirdly,the factors of social cognition are the important constraints affecting the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Although low-income groups can rationally analyze step by step the low-cost housing's effectiveness on people's social life,the awareness of the rights of weaker people,low level of understanding the low-rent housing system,and the less confidence in government systems and other factors,have led to a certain extent the community's weakening awareness of low-rent housing system,resulting in a low-rent housing system with the weakening practice effect of it.
In order to effectively enhance the practice of low-rent housing system for low-income groups,the effect of housing security,and promote the harmonious development of social stability,this article from the following issues were discussed:first,low-cost housing on the protection of the object to determine the scientific issues;second is on the Government in the implementation of low-rent housing system for the main role in the discussion;The third is on the low-rent housing system for the legal protection issues;The fourth is on the low-cost housing finance issues;five low-cost housing on the supporting management and service issues discussion.
本研究拟立足于制度分析的理论视角,运用社会学定量分析与质性分析相结合的研究方法,通过对低收入群体与住房保障局工作人员的问卷调查与个案访谈,以及其他地区的廉租房制度实践情况资料的了解,全面、系统、深入地分析当前廉租房制度实践现状、问题和廉租房制度实践的制约因素与廉租房制度实施效果之间的内在逻辑关系,构建一套具有一定政策咨询意义的能惠及低收入群体的政策方案,建立更为科学、更加实效的廉租住房保障制度。
本文建立在以下三个假设之上:1、经济因素影响廉租房制度实施效果。由于城市低收入人口数量众多,缺乏社会资源,可支配收入增长赶不上消费支出增长速度。而已有的住房公积金和经济适用房政策收益群体本质上排除低收入群体在外,廉租住房需求量极大。而廉租住房保障在当前的发展的中部城市经济社会背景下的资源投入力度又缺乏力度,导致廉租住房保障制度的推进面临较大的社会经济性压力,从而影响廉租房制度的实施效果。2、体制因素影响廉租房制度实施效果。在现行的压力型体制下,廉租住房保障制度在当前政府的任务序列中处于被边缘化的位置,政府的重视程度、配套法律法规的健全程度和保障力度、第三部门的支持程度,都影响着廉租房住房保障制度实施效果。3、社会认知影响廉租房制度实施效果。社会资本和人力资本匮乏的城市低收入群体对廉租住房保障话语体系的认识和对自身利益进行申诉的能力,以及城市居民对低收入者的态度和看法,影响着廉租住房保障制度的实施效果。
通过研究得出以下三个基本结论:(1)经济因素是影响廉租房制度实施效果的重要制约因素。巨大的社会需求与有限投入供给之间形成较大的现实矛盾,共同制约着廉租房制度实施效果。(2)体制因素是影响廉租房制度实施效果的重要制约因素。在当前的压力型体制下,地方政府往往从绩效评估角度考虑,把廉租房制度建设与实施作为绩效评估中的筹码,对中央廉租房政策进行随意变通以求在绩效评估中胜出,甚至刻意消减廉租房建设,控制廉租房入住率,从而造成廉租房制度实施效果不理想的局面。(3)社会认知因素是影响廉租房制度实施效果的重要制约因素。虽然低收入群体逐步能够理性分析廉租房对人们社会生活的作用功效,但是人们权利意识较弱、对廉租房制度的了解程度低、对政府制度信任程度较低等因素,都在一定程度上导致了社会对廉租房制度的认知弱化,进而造成了廉租房制度实施效果弱化。
为了有效提升廉租房制度实践对低收入群体住房保障的效果,促进社会稳定和谐发展,本文从以下几个方面问题进行了讨论:一是关于廉租房保障对象的科学确定问题的讨论;二是关于政府在廉租房制度实施中的主体作用问题的讨论;三是关于廉租房制度的法律保障问题的讨论;四是关于廉租房融资的问题的讨论;五是关于廉租房配套管理和服务的问题的讨论。
Since reform and opening up with the economic and social transformation,groups of different income groups in China have shown a situation like the pyramid of the property,the income distribution in the distribution of material interests.With the increase of social wealth and house prices,high and low income groups are going against the spending power of their housing.Concerned about people's livelihood,and promoting the harmonious development of social economy,the low-rent housing system becomes a focus of concern to solve the problem of low income people's housing.
From the theoretical perspective of the Institutional Analysis,with the research methods of quantitative analysis about sociology with a combination of qualitative analysis,by the questionnaire and interview cases of low-income groups and housing staff of the Security Bureau,as well as the understanding of the practice of low-rent housing system in other areas,this thesis aims to make a comprehensive,systematic and deep analysis of the status quo of low-rent housing system,and the internal relationship between the constraints about and the effect of the practice of low-rent housing system in order to construct a policy advisory group with a certain significance for the low-income groups who can benefit from the policy,and establish a more scientific and more effective protection for the low-rent housing system.This thesis is based on the following three assumptions.Firstly,economic factors affect the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Due to the large number of low-income urban population,and the lack of social resources,the growth in disposable income can not keep up with the growth rate of consumer spending.Besides,the low-income groups are essentially excluded from the existing housing fund and the affordable housing policy,leading to a great demand for low-rent housing.Low-cost housing security in the current development of the central city of economic and social resources is in the context of the lack of input intensity,resulting in the greater socio-economic pressure to promote low-cost housing security system. Secondly,the institutional factors affect the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Under the current system of pressure-type,low-rent housing system to protect the government's task in the current sequence is in a marginalized position.Government's attention,supporting the robustness of the laws and regulations and safeguards,and the third sector to support the level of low-cost housing are affecting the practice of housing security system.Thirdly,the social cognition affects the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Social capital and human capital-poor low-income groups in cities of low-rent housing system for the protection of discourse awareness and self-interest of the complainant's ability to carry out,and the attitudes and perceptions of low-income urban residents can affect the promotion of low-cost housing security system.
In this thesis,the following three basic conclusions are listed.Firstly, economic factors are the important constraints affecting the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Great social demand and limited supply in the reality between the larger contradictions commonly constrain the effect practice of low-rent housing system.Secondly, institutional factors are the important constraints affecting the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Under the type of pressure in the current system,the local government often from the point of view of the performance evaluation,the low-rent housing system and practice of performance evaluation as a bargaining chip in the central low-cost housing policy in order to free alternative performance assessment in the win,and even deliberately reduce the low-cost housing construction,the control room to stay low-cost rate,resulting in the practice of low-rent housing system is not satisfied with the situation.Thirdly,the factors of social cognition are the important constraints affecting the practice effect of low-rent housing system.Although low-income groups can rationally analyze step by step the low-cost housing's effectiveness on people's social life,the awareness of the rights of weaker people,low level of understanding the low-rent housing system,and the less confidence in government systems and other factors,have led to a certain extent the community's weakening awareness of low-rent housing system,resulting in a low-rent housing system with the weakening practice effect of it.
In order to effectively enhance the practice of low-rent housing system for low-income groups,the effect of housing security,and promote the harmonious development of social stability,this article from the following issues were discussed:first,low-cost housing on the protection of the object to determine the scientific issues;second is on the Government in the implementation of low-rent housing system for the main role in the discussion;The third is on the low-rent housing system for the legal protection issues;The fourth is on the low-cost housing finance issues;five low-cost housing on the supporting management and service issues discussion.
引文
[3]沈晓杰,我国城镇人均住宅面积世界第一遭置疑,中国经济周刊,2006(7)
[4]江怡主编.走向新世纪的西方哲学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.379.
[5]罗尔斯著,何怀宏等译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.3.
[6]柯年满,美国的公共住宅政策及其启示,中外房地产导报,2000.11
[7]刘颖,中国廉租住房制度创新的经济学分析,上海人民出版社,2007.11
[8]靳晨光、张长平,廉租住房制度透析,赏析建筑,2008.2
[10]荣敬本.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
11 倪星.中国政府绩效评估研究进展[J],行政论坛2008年第3期,第31页。
12 庞波.全面贯彻落实科学发展观努力构建科学的政府绩效评估指标体系[J],发展论坛2008年第10期,第11页。
15 红网,政府贴钱市民住新家,长沙今年新增廉租房7000套http://hn.rednet.cn/c/2009/03/30/1735830_1.htm
16 汤大猛、孙诺,我国廉租房制度建设研究,当代经济,2008(6)
17 黄玉新,我国廉租房制度实践中的若干问题及其对策探讨,2007。4
18 巴曙松张旭王淼,廉租房建设融资现状和创新趋势,国际融资,2006.9
19 路君平,我国廉租房制度建设及廉租房融资有关问题研究,《成人高教学刊》2007年第3期
20 李夺军,关于建立我国个人信用制度的探讨,中国金融,1999.12
[1]建设部、财政部、民政部、国土资源部、国家税务总局.城镇最低收入家庭廉租住房管理办法[Z].2004-03-01.
[2]国务院.关于促进房地产市场持续健康发展的通知[Z].2003-08-12.
[3]建设部.城镇廉租房管理办法[Z].1999-04-22.
[4]杨干忠.社会主义市场经济概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[5](美)哈尔·R·范里安.微观经济学:现代观点[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
[6](美)格里高利·曼昆.宏观经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[7](美)约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯.二就业、利息和货币通论[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005.
[8]陈秀山,张可云.区域经济理论[M].北京:商务印书馆出版,2003.
[9]江怡.走向新世纪的西方哲学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:379.
[10]罗尔斯.何怀宏译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:3.
[11]李勇辉.城镇居民住宅消费保障制度[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[12]包宗华.发达国家住房管理制度[M].北京:时事出版社,2001.
[13]谢经荣,吕萍,乔志敏.房地产经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[14]张鸿铭.住宅经济学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1998.
[15]厉以宁.中国住宅市场发展与政策分析[M].北京:中国物价出版社,1999.
[16]王小广.中国政府改革焦点系列:住房制度改革(四)[M].广州:广东经济出版社,1999.
[17]包宗华.住宅与房地产[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
[18]王微,刘凤英.住房制度改革[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[19](德)柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[20]姚玲珍.中国公共住房政策模式研究[M].上海:上海财政大学出版社,2003:1.
[21]成思危.中国城镇住房制度改革一日标模式实施难点[M].北京:民主建设出版社,1999.
[22]刘颖.中国廉租住房制度创新的经济学分析[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
[1]谢家谨.中国城镇住房发展与展望住宅产业[J].住宅产业,2002(12).
[2]刘志峰.建立适应各地实际情况的住房保障制度,http://www.curb.com.cn/pageshow.asp?id_forum=003712,2001-03-09/2001-08-30.
[3]施育晓.低收入人士住房政策:国际比较及其启示,http://www.gov.cn/zizl/2005-12/31/content_143724.htm,2005-12-31.
[4]长春市房地产管理局.积极而为 量力而行 努力开展廉租房的认定工作[J].合作住宅,2001(3).
[5]杨振华.廉租房建设的现状与思考[J].北京规划建设,2002(6).
[6]孙炳耀.城镇低收入人群住房福利研究总体思路[R].北京:中国社会科学院社会学研究所,2003.
[7]包宗华.关于加快建设廉租房体系的探讨[J].蜀都房地产,2001(3).
[8]包宗华.廉租屋的争论及其发展方向的探讨[J].中国房地产,2000(1).
[9]冯宗容.房改攻坚:止住房保障制度的构建[J].四川大学学报,2001(9).
[10]秦丽,赵正佳.关于廉租房几种房源的优劣分析[J].中国房地产,2001(7).
[11]杨玲.论我国城镇住房保障制度的建设与完善[J].现代城市研究,2002(6).
[12]曹国安,曹明.西方国家的住房保障体制及其启示[J].中国房地产,2003(6).
[13]杨圣明,温桂芳,汪利娜,李健.德国英国住房制度考察报告[J].经济研究参考,2000(59).
[14]冯宗容.廉租房运作机制评析及创新[J].经济体制改革,2002(3).
[15]建设部官员:3年内解决747万城市低收入住房困难,http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2009-03-05/120017342809.shtml,2009-03-05.
[16]朱记军,杨易.浅议我国廉租住房制度[J].中南财经政法大学研究生学报,2007(1).
[17]赵敏,李斌.中国廉租房制度运行模式再设计[J].现代教企育业,2007(6).
[18]人民网.农民工公寓为何遭遇“集体冷落”,http://acftu.people.com.cn/GB/67561/4778882.html,2006-09-05.
[19]祝亚辉.城市社会弱势群体居住问题研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2004.
[20]沈晓杰.我国城镇人均住宅面积世界第一遭置疑[J].中国经济周刊,2006(7).
[21]柯年满.美国的公共住宅政策及其启示[J].中外房地产导报,2000(11).
[22]靳晨光,张长平.廉租住房制度透析[J].赏析建筑,2008(2).
[23]荣敬本.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
[24]倪星.中国政府绩效评估研究进展[J].行政论坛,2008(3):31.
[25]庞波.全面贯彻落实科学发展观努力构建科学的政府绩效评估指标体系[J],发展论坛2008(10):11.
[26]星辰在线.长沙新增廉租房1万3千多户,政府贴钱市民住新家,http://news.csonline.com.cn/cs/2/200903/t20090330_927517.htm,2009-03-30.
[27]红网.政府贴钱市民住新家,长沙今年新增廉租房7000套,http://hn.rednet.cn/c/2009/03/30/1735830_1.htm,2009-03-30.
[28]渠丽花,杨东朗,杨丽.廉租房制度研究及其管理[J].西安邮电学院学报,2003(10).
[29]陈传伟,吴长征.浅议建立廉租房供应体系的有关问题及对策[J].开发与建设,2004(1).
[30]王炜,杨碧,于威.论我国城镇廉租房的房源及其资金保障[J].资源产业,2004(10).
[31]梁志超.开发廉租房刻不容缓[J].上海经济,2004(1).
[32]董映雪,杨晓光.缓释住宅结构矛盾:轨道交通+廉租房[J].城市开发,2005(5).
[33]赵燕.廉租房建设与国家宏观经济[J].城市发展研究,2005(3).
[34]方东卫,糜仲春,程永宏.社会保障制定中贫困线和贫困率的测算[J].上海经济研究,2001(2).
[35]刘正才.廉租房将终结经济适用房[J].中国社会导刊,2006(13).
[36]张静晓,杨德钦.实施廉租住房制度的反思[J].建筑管理现代化,2006(1).
[37]王永康.我国住房保障体系制度函待完善[J].广西城镇建设,2006(7).
[38]叶平.赣州廉租房的三种形式和六个环节[J].住房保障,2006(9).
[39]万婷.完善我国城镇住房保障制度的政策性建议[J].住房保障,2005(10).
[40]曹腊梅.现代城市政府住宅政策研究--以上海住房公共政策为个案分析[J].上海理工大学学报,2006(6).
[41]唐旭君:对某市廉租房政策的另类思考[J].城市发展研究,2005(3).
[42]徐飞,张然.香港公屋制度对国内廉租住房建设的启示[J].当代经理人,2006(3).
[43]翟峰.城市廉租房社区:穷人的住房期待[J].经济观察,2005(6).
[44]任志强.福州廉租住房建设管理环环相扣[J].住宅与房地产,2005(10).
[45]赵健.北京住房制度改革对建立和完善住房保障制度的启示[J].价格月刊,2006(1).
[46]刘云.浅议城镇廉租住房[J].城市开发,2006(6).
[47]韦月红.广西将采取系列住房保障措施重点解决城镇中低收入居民家庭住房问题[J].广西城镇建设,2006(8).
[48]扬州市房产管理局.多轮驱动建立住房保障制度[J].城市开发,2005(1).
[49]陈燕,林炳耀.福利国家英国的住房政策[J].城市问题,2003(2).
[50]张波.南昌--创新机制健全廉租住房保障体系[J].城乡建设,2006(6).
[51]路君平.我国廉租房制度建设及廉租房融资有关问题研究[J].成人高教学刊,2007(3).
[52]李夺军.关于建立我国个人信用制度的探讨[J].中国金融,1999(12).
[53]林文.福建省廉租住房建设初探[J].中国房地信息,2006(9).
[54]康琪学.经济适用房与廉租房何去何从[J].中国房地信息,2005.
[55]刘颖,陈怡男.关于合理制定廉租房补贴标准的思考[J].价格理论与实践,2005.
[56]中国社会学网.中国城镇低收入人群住房福利政策研究论坛综述,http://www.sociology.cass.cn/shxw/shgz/shgz2/t20031126_1774.htm,2003-10-17/2003-11-26.
[57]巴曙松,张旭,王森.廉租房建设融资现状和创新趋势[J].国际融资,2006(9).
[58]阳湘燕.低收入家庭可以廉租房来摆脱“房奴”之苦[J].金融经济,2006(9).
[59]马立诚.廉租房为何空闻楼梯响[J].中国新闻周刊,2006(7).
[60]钟岩,马永莉.商品房、经济适用房和廉租房的经济学分析[J].华东经济管理,2006(8).
[61]张静.国外廉租住房保障制度对我国的启示[J].城市开发,2002(2).
[62]薛友榕.解决最低收入家庭住房问题自议[J].龙岩学院学报,2006(4).
[63]彭美玉.从经济学角度探析廉租房制度[J].住宅与房地产业,2004(4).
[1]Martin Lux.Social Housing in Europe 2000[J].Institute of Sociology,the Czech Republic,2001.
[2]Homelessness Code of Practice for Local Authority.Office of the Deputy of Prime of MinisterUK,July 2002.
[3]DETR and DSS.Quality and Choice:A Decent Home For All:The Housing green Paper [J].Office of the Deputy of Prime of Minister UK,2000,(4)
[4]Balchin,P.N.Housing Policy in Europe[M].London:Routledge,1996.
[5]Harlore,M.The People's Home Social Housing in Europe&America[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1975.
[4]江怡主编.走向新世纪的西方哲学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.379.
[5]罗尔斯著,何怀宏等译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.3.
[6]柯年满,美国的公共住宅政策及其启示,中外房地产导报,2000.11
[7]刘颖,中国廉租住房制度创新的经济学分析,上海人民出版社,2007.11
[8]靳晨光、张长平,廉租住房制度透析,赏析建筑,2008.2
[10]荣敬本.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
11 倪星.中国政府绩效评估研究进展[J],行政论坛2008年第3期,第31页。
12 庞波.全面贯彻落实科学发展观努力构建科学的政府绩效评估指标体系[J],发展论坛2008年第10期,第11页。
15 红网,政府贴钱市民住新家,长沙今年新增廉租房7000套http://hn.rednet.cn/c/2009/03/30/1735830_1.htm
16 汤大猛、孙诺,我国廉租房制度建设研究,当代经济,2008(6)
17 黄玉新,我国廉租房制度实践中的若干问题及其对策探讨,2007。4
18 巴曙松张旭王淼,廉租房建设融资现状和创新趋势,国际融资,2006.9
19 路君平,我国廉租房制度建设及廉租房融资有关问题研究,《成人高教学刊》2007年第3期
20 李夺军,关于建立我国个人信用制度的探讨,中国金融,1999.12
[1]建设部、财政部、民政部、国土资源部、国家税务总局.城镇最低收入家庭廉租住房管理办法[Z].2004-03-01.
[2]国务院.关于促进房地产市场持续健康发展的通知[Z].2003-08-12.
[3]建设部.城镇廉租房管理办法[Z].1999-04-22.
[4]杨干忠.社会主义市场经济概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[5](美)哈尔·R·范里安.微观经济学:现代观点[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
[6](美)格里高利·曼昆.宏观经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
[7](美)约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯.二就业、利息和货币通论[M].北京:华夏出版社,2005.
[8]陈秀山,张可云.区域经济理论[M].北京:商务印书馆出版,2003.
[9]江怡.走向新世纪的西方哲学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:379.
[10]罗尔斯.何怀宏译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:3.
[11]李勇辉.城镇居民住宅消费保障制度[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2005.
[12]包宗华.发达国家住房管理制度[M].北京:时事出版社,2001.
[13]谢经荣,吕萍,乔志敏.房地产经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[14]张鸿铭.住宅经济学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1998.
[15]厉以宁.中国住宅市场发展与政策分析[M].北京:中国物价出版社,1999.
[16]王小广.中国政府改革焦点系列:住房制度改革(四)[M].广州:广东经济出版社,1999.
[17]包宗华.住宅与房地产[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
[18]王微,刘凤英.住房制度改革[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[19](德)柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[20]姚玲珍.中国公共住房政策模式研究[M].上海:上海财政大学出版社,2003:1.
[21]成思危.中国城镇住房制度改革一日标模式实施难点[M].北京:民主建设出版社,1999.
[22]刘颖.中国廉租住房制度创新的经济学分析[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
[1]谢家谨.中国城镇住房发展与展望住宅产业[J].住宅产业,2002(12).
[2]刘志峰.建立适应各地实际情况的住房保障制度,http://www.curb.com.cn/pageshow.asp?id_forum=003712,2001-03-09/2001-08-30.
[3]施育晓.低收入人士住房政策:国际比较及其启示,http://www.gov.cn/zizl/2005-12/31/content_143724.htm,2005-12-31.
[4]长春市房地产管理局.积极而为 量力而行 努力开展廉租房的认定工作[J].合作住宅,2001(3).
[5]杨振华.廉租房建设的现状与思考[J].北京规划建设,2002(6).
[6]孙炳耀.城镇低收入人群住房福利研究总体思路[R].北京:中国社会科学院社会学研究所,2003.
[7]包宗华.关于加快建设廉租房体系的探讨[J].蜀都房地产,2001(3).
[8]包宗华.廉租屋的争论及其发展方向的探讨[J].中国房地产,2000(1).
[9]冯宗容.房改攻坚:止住房保障制度的构建[J].四川大学学报,2001(9).
[10]秦丽,赵正佳.关于廉租房几种房源的优劣分析[J].中国房地产,2001(7).
[11]杨玲.论我国城镇住房保障制度的建设与完善[J].现代城市研究,2002(6).
[12]曹国安,曹明.西方国家的住房保障体制及其启示[J].中国房地产,2003(6).
[13]杨圣明,温桂芳,汪利娜,李健.德国英国住房制度考察报告[J].经济研究参考,2000(59).
[14]冯宗容.廉租房运作机制评析及创新[J].经济体制改革,2002(3).
[15]建设部官员:3年内解决747万城市低收入住房困难,http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2009-03-05/120017342809.shtml,2009-03-05.
[16]朱记军,杨易.浅议我国廉租住房制度[J].中南财经政法大学研究生学报,2007(1).
[17]赵敏,李斌.中国廉租房制度运行模式再设计[J].现代教企育业,2007(6).
[18]人民网.农民工公寓为何遭遇“集体冷落”,http://acftu.people.com.cn/GB/67561/4778882.html,2006-09-05.
[19]祝亚辉.城市社会弱势群体居住问题研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2004.
[20]沈晓杰.我国城镇人均住宅面积世界第一遭置疑[J].中国经济周刊,2006(7).
[21]柯年满.美国的公共住宅政策及其启示[J].中外房地产导报,2000(11).
[22]靳晨光,张长平.廉租住房制度透析[J].赏析建筑,2008(2).
[23]荣敬本.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
[24]倪星.中国政府绩效评估研究进展[J].行政论坛,2008(3):31.
[25]庞波.全面贯彻落实科学发展观努力构建科学的政府绩效评估指标体系[J],发展论坛2008(10):11.
[26]星辰在线.长沙新增廉租房1万3千多户,政府贴钱市民住新家,http://news.csonline.com.cn/cs/2/200903/t20090330_927517.htm,2009-03-30.
[27]红网.政府贴钱市民住新家,长沙今年新增廉租房7000套,http://hn.rednet.cn/c/2009/03/30/1735830_1.htm,2009-03-30.
[28]渠丽花,杨东朗,杨丽.廉租房制度研究及其管理[J].西安邮电学院学报,2003(10).
[29]陈传伟,吴长征.浅议建立廉租房供应体系的有关问题及对策[J].开发与建设,2004(1).
[30]王炜,杨碧,于威.论我国城镇廉租房的房源及其资金保障[J].资源产业,2004(10).
[31]梁志超.开发廉租房刻不容缓[J].上海经济,2004(1).
[32]董映雪,杨晓光.缓释住宅结构矛盾:轨道交通+廉租房[J].城市开发,2005(5).
[33]赵燕.廉租房建设与国家宏观经济[J].城市发展研究,2005(3).
[34]方东卫,糜仲春,程永宏.社会保障制定中贫困线和贫困率的测算[J].上海经济研究,2001(2).
[35]刘正才.廉租房将终结经济适用房[J].中国社会导刊,2006(13).
[36]张静晓,杨德钦.实施廉租住房制度的反思[J].建筑管理现代化,2006(1).
[37]王永康.我国住房保障体系制度函待完善[J].广西城镇建设,2006(7).
[38]叶平.赣州廉租房的三种形式和六个环节[J].住房保障,2006(9).
[39]万婷.完善我国城镇住房保障制度的政策性建议[J].住房保障,2005(10).
[40]曹腊梅.现代城市政府住宅政策研究--以上海住房公共政策为个案分析[J].上海理工大学学报,2006(6).
[41]唐旭君:对某市廉租房政策的另类思考[J].城市发展研究,2005(3).
[42]徐飞,张然.香港公屋制度对国内廉租住房建设的启示[J].当代经理人,2006(3).
[43]翟峰.城市廉租房社区:穷人的住房期待[J].经济观察,2005(6).
[44]任志强.福州廉租住房建设管理环环相扣[J].住宅与房地产,2005(10).
[45]赵健.北京住房制度改革对建立和完善住房保障制度的启示[J].价格月刊,2006(1).
[46]刘云.浅议城镇廉租住房[J].城市开发,2006(6).
[47]韦月红.广西将采取系列住房保障措施重点解决城镇中低收入居民家庭住房问题[J].广西城镇建设,2006(8).
[48]扬州市房产管理局.多轮驱动建立住房保障制度[J].城市开发,2005(1).
[49]陈燕,林炳耀.福利国家英国的住房政策[J].城市问题,2003(2).
[50]张波.南昌--创新机制健全廉租住房保障体系[J].城乡建设,2006(6).
[51]路君平.我国廉租房制度建设及廉租房融资有关问题研究[J].成人高教学刊,2007(3).
[52]李夺军.关于建立我国个人信用制度的探讨[J].中国金融,1999(12).
[53]林文.福建省廉租住房建设初探[J].中国房地信息,2006(9).
[54]康琪学.经济适用房与廉租房何去何从[J].中国房地信息,2005.
[55]刘颖,陈怡男.关于合理制定廉租房补贴标准的思考[J].价格理论与实践,2005.
[56]中国社会学网.中国城镇低收入人群住房福利政策研究论坛综述,http://www.sociology.cass.cn/shxw/shgz/shgz2/t20031126_1774.htm,2003-10-17/2003-11-26.
[57]巴曙松,张旭,王森.廉租房建设融资现状和创新趋势[J].国际融资,2006(9).
[58]阳湘燕.低收入家庭可以廉租房来摆脱“房奴”之苦[J].金融经济,2006(9).
[59]马立诚.廉租房为何空闻楼梯响[J].中国新闻周刊,2006(7).
[60]钟岩,马永莉.商品房、经济适用房和廉租房的经济学分析[J].华东经济管理,2006(8).
[61]张静.国外廉租住房保障制度对我国的启示[J].城市开发,2002(2).
[62]薛友榕.解决最低收入家庭住房问题自议[J].龙岩学院学报,2006(4).
[63]彭美玉.从经济学角度探析廉租房制度[J].住宅与房地产业,2004(4).
[1]Martin Lux.Social Housing in Europe 2000[J].Institute of Sociology,the Czech Republic,2001.
[2]Homelessness Code of Practice for Local Authority.Office of the Deputy of Prime of MinisterUK,July 2002.
[3]DETR and DSS.Quality and Choice:A Decent Home For All:The Housing green Paper [J].Office of the Deputy of Prime of Minister UK,2000,(4)
[4]Balchin,P.N.Housing Policy in Europe[M].London:Routledge,1996.
[5]Harlore,M.The People's Home Social Housing in Europe&America[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1975.