松潘—阿坝盆地构造演化与石油地质基本条件
|
摘要
对松潘—阿坝盆地沉积充填、构造变形、火成岩及变质岩研究的基础上,完成了本论文,取得了如下主要认识与新进展:
1、松潘—阿坝盆地存在4个重要区域不整合,相应地构造演化分为:基底形成、早古生代被动大陆边缘、晚古生代复合被动大陆边缘、三叠纪被动大陆边缘至前陆盆地和三叠纪后的陆内盆地构造演化5个主要演化阶段。
2、提出在晋宁运动期间,松潘—阿坝古地块由北向南与扬子古板块碰撞、形成的岛弧型火山岩变质后成为本区刚性基底,若尔盖附近基底的刚性强于周缘地区。基底自形成以来,一直与扬子板块保持一体。龙门山造山带中的彭灌杂岩体是晚印支运动中被推出地表的基底,并提出了相应的运动模式。
3、造山隆起带构造样式较复杂,发育大量的逆冲断裂与断块体;坳陷带构造样式相对简单,构造样式表现出较大的层次性,总体为盖层滑脱式逆冲褶皱型,滑脱面为三迭系与晚古生界之间的界面和震旦系与前震旦系界面。
4、早古生代,本区为被动大陆边缘,沉积了高质量的烃源岩;晚古生代盆地主体为稳定克拉通盆地,广泛发育碳酸盐岩台地,形成了性能良好的储集岩,进入三叠纪,本区为克拉通盆地至前陆盆地演化阶段,由碳酸盐岩台地转换为海槽,形成逾万米浊积岩,是本区有效区域盖层;三叠纪末的晚印支运动形成现今地质格架并使本区抬升成陆;从侏罗纪开始本区进入受印支期断裂控制的陆内盆地演化阶段,推测喜马拉雅运动对本区构造格架的影响较小。
5、提出二叠纪末期阿尼玛卿断裂带以南发生重力滑覆,在盆地主体部位形成收缩构造。计算了三叠系剥蚀厚度和残存厚度,并提出本区烃源岩的高成熟度受控于三叠系原始埋深、火成岩活动与地层层间滑动摩擦热能,三叠系变质作用类型以区域变质作用为主,变质作用程度极低。
6、本区烃源岩已进入过成熟阶段,有过多次排烃过程,现今的油气状态以干气为主。两套生储盖组合中,三叠系封盖能力优于志留系,三叠系覆盖区的油气远景较好。二叠纪末期的重力滑覆运动形成圈闭,能够较早捕获油气,有利于本区油气成藏;三叠纪末期的晚印支运动对早期油藏有改造作用,但同时也为油气的再次聚集提供了圈闭条件。提出摩天岭下组合是可供勘探的现实区带。
On the basis of the study of depositional basinfilling, tectonic deformation,igneous rock and metamorphic rock in the Songpan-Aba basin, the paper drawsprimary conclusions and new fruits as follows:
1、There are four primary regional unconformity for the Songpan-Aba basin,andthe corresponding structural evolution can be subdivided into 5 primary phases: Thebasement formation, the Eopaleozoic passive continental margin, the Neopaleozoiccraton basin and coexistent passive continental margin, the Trias craton basin toforeland basin and later Trias intermontain basin structural evolution.
2、During the Jinning movement, the island-type volcanic rock which generatedby the diastrophic block of Songpan-Aba basin bumping with Yangzi old plate fromnorth to south, formed the rigid basement undergoing metamorphism. The rigidity inthe Ruoergai basement was stronger than that of the peripheral region. After theformation of basement, it always kept in onepiece with Yangzi plate. During the lateperiod of the Indosinian movement, the Pengguan complex rock in the LongmenshanOrogenic Belt was the former basement that thrusted out of the earth's surface. Thus,the forming process of the basement in the study area is studied in detail and is used tosummarize tectonic-evolutionary model.
3、Tectonic style of the orogenic-belt uplift is very complicated,and is markedby the growing of a large number of thrusting rupture and faulted block. But thetectonic style of the geotectogene is relatively simple,which is exhibitted by themajor hierarchy,and generally belongs to the thrust fold pattern induced by cap-rockdecollement;The slip surface includes the interface between argillaceous or silty mudrock of the Triassic and the carbonate rocks of the late Paleozoic, and the sedimentaryrocks of the Sinian and metamorphic rocks of the Presinian.
4、During Eopaleozoic, the study area was in a period of the passive continentalmargin where deposited high quality source rock;Neopaleozoic was marked by asteady craton basin with the development of carbonate platform, during which thehigh-quality reservoir rocks were formed. Coming into Trias, the study area became a
craton basin to foreland basin evolution period, during which the carbonate platformconversion to ocean trough, while deposited more than myriameters turbidites that formthe effective regional cover. In the end of the Trias, the late of the Indosinian movementformed the present geologic framework and the study area was uplifted and cropped out.At the beginning of Jurassic period, the study area was entered a evolutionary period ofthe inter-mountain basin that is controlled by Indosinian faults. And the Himalayanmovement in the later has a light influence on the tectonic framework of the study area.5、In the south part of Animaqin fault zone, gravity collapse was occurred during theend of the Permain;And contraction tectonics was formed in the main body of basin.Calculating the Trias thickness of both the denude and the remain, and considering thefeature of resource rocks high maturity in the study area that were controlled by the Triasoriginal buried depth, igneous rock action and interlayer frictional heat energy and so on,all of these studies were finished in the first time. The Trias metamorphism was priority toregional metamorphism, and its extent was mighty low.6、The resource rock of the study area had been came into the post mature periodundergoing the multiple migration. Thus, only dry gas is created in today. In the two trapunits, the cover ability of Trias is better than Silurian, and its coverage area has the betterhydrocarbon potential. In the end of the Permain, the gravity-collapse movement formedtrap, which could capture oil and gas that were formed in the early period;the lateIndosinian movement during end of Trias had the rebuilding function to the early oilreservoir, in the same time providing the trap condition for the regroup of the oil and gas.Therefore, the lower association of oil gas in the Motianling unit is thought as the realismlines.
1、松潘—阿坝盆地存在4个重要区域不整合,相应地构造演化分为:基底形成、早古生代被动大陆边缘、晚古生代复合被动大陆边缘、三叠纪被动大陆边缘至前陆盆地和三叠纪后的陆内盆地构造演化5个主要演化阶段。
2、提出在晋宁运动期间,松潘—阿坝古地块由北向南与扬子古板块碰撞、形成的岛弧型火山岩变质后成为本区刚性基底,若尔盖附近基底的刚性强于周缘地区。基底自形成以来,一直与扬子板块保持一体。龙门山造山带中的彭灌杂岩体是晚印支运动中被推出地表的基底,并提出了相应的运动模式。
3、造山隆起带构造样式较复杂,发育大量的逆冲断裂与断块体;坳陷带构造样式相对简单,构造样式表现出较大的层次性,总体为盖层滑脱式逆冲褶皱型,滑脱面为三迭系与晚古生界之间的界面和震旦系与前震旦系界面。
4、早古生代,本区为被动大陆边缘,沉积了高质量的烃源岩;晚古生代盆地主体为稳定克拉通盆地,广泛发育碳酸盐岩台地,形成了性能良好的储集岩,进入三叠纪,本区为克拉通盆地至前陆盆地演化阶段,由碳酸盐岩台地转换为海槽,形成逾万米浊积岩,是本区有效区域盖层;三叠纪末的晚印支运动形成现今地质格架并使本区抬升成陆;从侏罗纪开始本区进入受印支期断裂控制的陆内盆地演化阶段,推测喜马拉雅运动对本区构造格架的影响较小。
5、提出二叠纪末期阿尼玛卿断裂带以南发生重力滑覆,在盆地主体部位形成收缩构造。计算了三叠系剥蚀厚度和残存厚度,并提出本区烃源岩的高成熟度受控于三叠系原始埋深、火成岩活动与地层层间滑动摩擦热能,三叠系变质作用类型以区域变质作用为主,变质作用程度极低。
6、本区烃源岩已进入过成熟阶段,有过多次排烃过程,现今的油气状态以干气为主。两套生储盖组合中,三叠系封盖能力优于志留系,三叠系覆盖区的油气远景较好。二叠纪末期的重力滑覆运动形成圈闭,能够较早捕获油气,有利于本区油气成藏;三叠纪末期的晚印支运动对早期油藏有改造作用,但同时也为油气的再次聚集提供了圈闭条件。提出摩天岭下组合是可供勘探的现实区带。
On the basis of the study of depositional basinfilling, tectonic deformation,igneous rock and metamorphic rock in the Songpan-Aba basin, the paper drawsprimary conclusions and new fruits as follows:
1、There are four primary regional unconformity for the Songpan-Aba basin,andthe corresponding structural evolution can be subdivided into 5 primary phases: Thebasement formation, the Eopaleozoic passive continental margin, the Neopaleozoiccraton basin and coexistent passive continental margin, the Trias craton basin toforeland basin and later Trias intermontain basin structural evolution.
2、During the Jinning movement, the island-type volcanic rock which generatedby the diastrophic block of Songpan-Aba basin bumping with Yangzi old plate fromnorth to south, formed the rigid basement undergoing metamorphism. The rigidity inthe Ruoergai basement was stronger than that of the peripheral region. After theformation of basement, it always kept in onepiece with Yangzi plate. During the lateperiod of the Indosinian movement, the Pengguan complex rock in the LongmenshanOrogenic Belt was the former basement that thrusted out of the earth's surface. Thus,the forming process of the basement in the study area is studied in detail and is used tosummarize tectonic-evolutionary model.
3、Tectonic style of the orogenic-belt uplift is very complicated,and is markedby the growing of a large number of thrusting rupture and faulted block. But thetectonic style of the geotectogene is relatively simple,which is exhibitted by themajor hierarchy,and generally belongs to the thrust fold pattern induced by cap-rockdecollement;The slip surface includes the interface between argillaceous or silty mudrock of the Triassic and the carbonate rocks of the late Paleozoic, and the sedimentaryrocks of the Sinian and metamorphic rocks of the Presinian.
4、During Eopaleozoic, the study area was in a period of the passive continentalmargin where deposited high quality source rock;Neopaleozoic was marked by asteady craton basin with the development of carbonate platform, during which thehigh-quality reservoir rocks were formed. Coming into Trias, the study area became a
craton basin to foreland basin evolution period, during which the carbonate platformconversion to ocean trough, while deposited more than myriameters turbidites that formthe effective regional cover. In the end of the Trias, the late of the Indosinian movementformed the present geologic framework and the study area was uplifted and cropped out.At the beginning of Jurassic period, the study area was entered a evolutionary period ofthe inter-mountain basin that is controlled by Indosinian faults. And the Himalayanmovement in the later has a light influence on the tectonic framework of the study area.5、In the south part of Animaqin fault zone, gravity collapse was occurred during theend of the Permain;And contraction tectonics was formed in the main body of basin.Calculating the Trias thickness of both the denude and the remain, and considering thefeature of resource rocks high maturity in the study area that were controlled by the Triasoriginal buried depth, igneous rock action and interlayer frictional heat energy and so on,all of these studies were finished in the first time. The Trias metamorphism was priority toregional metamorphism, and its extent was mighty low.6、The resource rock of the study area had been came into the post mature periodundergoing the multiple migration. Thus, only dry gas is created in today. In the two trapunits, the cover ability of Trias is better than Silurian, and its coverage area has the betterhydrocarbon potential. In the end of the Permain, the gravity-collapse movement formedtrap, which could capture oil and gas that were formed in the early period;the lateIndosinian movement during end of Trias had the rebuilding function to the early oilreservoir, in the same time providing the trap condition for the regroup of the oil and gas.Therefore, the lower association of oil gas in the Motianling unit is thought as the realismlines.
引文
[1]蔡立国,刘伟新,宋立珩.松潘-阿坝地区盆地演化及油气远景.石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):92-98
[2]蔡立国.青藏高原东部石油地质基本特征.南京:南京大学出版社,1993
[3]曹宣铎,胡云绪,赵江天,等.秦岭石炭纪裂陷盆地的沉积构造演化.西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1994
[4]陈炳蔚,王恺元,刘万熹,等.怒江-斓沧江-金沙江地区大地构造.北京:地质出版社,1987
[5]陈炳蔚.三江地区主要大地构造问题及其成矿的关系.北京:地质出版社,1991
[6]陈发景,汪新文.盆地构造分析与油气勘探. 勘探家,1996,1(1):25-28
[7]陈发景,张光亚,陈昭年. 不整合分析及其在陆相盆地构造研究中的意义.现代地质,2004,18(3):269-275
[8]陈景达.板块构造大陆边缘与含油气盆地.山东:石油大学出版社,1989
[9]陈玉禄,侯浩,杨更.康滇地轴中段西缘二叠纪火山岩岩石地球化学特征.四川地质学,1999,19(1):22-25
[10]冯益民,曹宣铎,张二朋.西秦岭造山带结构造山过程及动力学.西安:西安地图出版社,2002
[11]郭正吾,等.四川盆地的形成与演化.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994
[12]昊香尧.岩组学导论.重庆:重庆出版社,1986
[13]胡世华.川西义敦岛弧的火山-沉积作用.北京:地质出版社,1992
[14]胡新伟,邓江红.龙门山中段推覆构造带构造特征.成都理工学院学报,1996,23(3):101-106
[15]黄汲清,陈炳蔚.中国及邻区特提斯的演化.北京:地质出版社,1987
[16] 姜琦刚 . 四川若尔盖北部寒武 -奥陶系太阳顶群沉积环境分析 . 长春地质学院学报,1994,24(3):271-277
[17]李昌年.火成岩微量元素岩石学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992
[18]李晋僧.秦岭显生宙古海盆沉积和演化史.北京:地质出版社,1994
[19]李秋生,彭苏萍,高锐.青藏高原北部巴颜喀拉构造带基底隆起的地震学证据.地质通报,2003,22(10):782-788
[20]李曙光,侯振辉,杨永成.南秦岭勉略构造带三岔子古岩浆弧的地球化学特征及形成时代.中国科学,2003,33(12):1163-1173
[21]李勇,A L DENSMOREZ,周荣军,等.青藏高原东缘龙门山晚新生代剥蚀厚度与弹性挠曲模拟.地质学报,2005,79(5):608-615
[22]李勇,侯中健,司光影,等.青藏高原东缘新生代构造层序与构造事件.中国地质,2002,29(1):30-36
[23]李勇,曾允孚.龙门山逆冲推覆作用的地层标识.成都理工学院报,1995,22(2):1-10
[24]林茂炳,马永旺.论龙门山彭灌杂岩体的构造属性.成都理工学院学报,1995,22(1):42-46
[25]林茂炳,吴山.龙门山推覆构造变形特征.成都理工学院学报,1991,18(1)
[26]凌洪飞,沈渭洲,章邦桐,等.江西修水地区震旦纪前后沉积岩的 Nd 同位素组成和物质来源.岩石学报,1992.8(2):190-194
[27]刘宝珺,许效松,夏文杰等.中国南方岩相古地理图集.北京:科学出版社,1994
[28]刘朝基.川西藏东特提斯地质.四川:西南交通大学出版社,1996
[29] 刘 文 均 , 郑 荣 才 , 李 祥 辉 . 龙 门 山 泥 盆 纪 沉 积 盆 地 的 古 地 理 和 古 构 造 重 建 . 地 质 学报,1999,73(2):109-120
[30]刘增乾,徐宪,潘桂棠,等.青藏高原大地构造形成与演化.北京:地质出版社,1990
[31]龙学明.龙门山中北段地史发展的若干问题.成都地质学院学报.1991,78(1):8-76
[32]陆克政,朱筱敏,漆家福. 含油气盆地分析. 北京:石油大学出版社,2001,1-424
[33]罗建宁.三江特提斯沉积地质与成矿.北京:地质出版社,1992
[34]罗志立,等.龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化.成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994
[35]马杏垣,索书田.论滑覆及岩石圈内多层次滑脱构造.地质学报,1984,58(3)
[36]马永生、梅冥相.碳酸盐岩储层沉积学.北京:地质出版社,1999
[37]马永旺,林茂炳,王国芝.彭灌断裂带的构造特征.成都理工学院学报,1994,21(3):14-19
[38]马永旺,王国芝,胡新伟.“彭灌杂岩”推覆体的构造变形特征.四川地质学报,1996,16(2):110-104
[39]马永旺,杨尽.龙门山中段推覆构造的变形特征.成都理工学院学报,2001,28(3):236-240
[40]彭军,陈洪德,曾允孚.龙门山南段前陆盆地中—新生代砂岩特征及物源分析.中国区域地质,2000,19(1):77-84
[41]秦克令.陕、甘、川交界处摩天岭区碧口群层序及时代划分,中国地质科学院西安地质矿产研究所所刊第 30 号,西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1990
[42]邱家骧.应用岩浆岩岩石学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991
[43]沈渭洲,陆怀鹏,徐士进等.丹巴地区变质沉积岩 Sm—Nd 同位素研究,地质学报,1998,33(3)
[44]四川省地质矿产局.四川省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1991
[45]宋志高.北秦岭-北祁连(天水-宝鸡间)早古生代火山岩系及其构造连接关系研究,中国地质科学院西安地质矿产研究所所刊,第 24 号,西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1991
[46]田在艺,张庆春. 中国含油气沉积盆地. 北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[47]万天丰.中国大地构造学纲要.北京:地质出版社,2004
[48]汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探.北京:地质出版社,2002
[49]王椿镛,韩渭宾,吴建平,等.松潘一甘孜造山带地壳速度结构.地震学报,2003.25(3):229-241
[50]王二七,孟庆任,陈智梁,等.龙门山断裂带印支期左旋走滑运动及其大地构造成因.地学前缘,2001,8(2):375-384
[51]王海燕.若尔盖盆地与西秦岭造山带岩石圈结构与地球动力学过程-深地震反射剖面技术在造山带研究中的应用[博士学位论文].北京:中国地质科学院,2005
[52]王鸿祯.中国古地理图集.北京:地图出版社,1985
[53]王小亚,朱文耀,符养.GPS 监测的中国及其周边现时地壳形变. 地球物理学报,2002,45(2):198-209
[54]王永诚.油气储层评价,北京:石油工业出版社,1999
[55]王有学,钱辉.青海东部地壳速度结构特征研究.地学前缘.2000.7(4):568-579
[56]王宗秀,许志琴,杨天南.松潘—甘孜滑脱型山链变形构造演化模式.地质科学,1997,32(3):327-336
[57]吴运高,李继亮.造山带逆冲推覆构造研究的主要新进展.地球科学进展,2000,15(4):426-433
[58]肖序常,李廷栋.青藏高原的构造演化与隆升机制.广东:广东科技出版社,2000
[59]谢启兴,何文劲,陈明.平武地区中生代花岗岩类的演化特征及其成因意义.四川地质学报,2000,20(2):93-99
[60]徐常芳.中国大陆岩石圈结构、盆地构造和油气运移探讨.地学前缘,2003,10(4):115-127
[61]徐士进,王汝成,沈渭洲,等.松潘-甘孜造山带中晋宁期花岗岩的 U-Pb 和 RbSr 同位素定年及其大地构造意义.中国科学(D 辑), 1996,26(1):52-58
[62]许继峰,王强.Adakitic 火成岩对大陆地壳增厚过程的指示:以青藏北部火山岩为例.地学前缘,2003,10(4):401-406
[63]许效松,徐强,潘桂棠,等.中国南大陆演化与全球古地理对比.北京:地质出版社. 1996
[64]许志琴,崔军文.大陆山链变形构造动力学.北京:冶金工业出版社,1996
[65]许志琴,侯立伟,王大可等.1990.中国西南松潘一甘孜中生代碰撞型造山带的薄壳构造及前陆逆冲系.中国地质科学院院报 20 号.126-129
[66]许志琴,侯立伟,王宗秀,等.中国松播—甘孜造山带的造山过程.北京:地质出版社,1992
[67]闫全人,王宗起,闫臻等.碧口群火山岩的时代—SHRIMP 锆石 U-Pb 测年结果.地质通报, 2003,22(6)
[68]杨逢清.松潘甘孜地块与秦岭褶皱带、扬子地台的关系及其发展史,地质学报,1994 年,68(3)
[69]杨恒书,赖旭龙,杨逢清等.四川隆康、塔藏含火山岩地层时代新证据.中国区域地质,1995,No.1:71-75
[70]杨巍然,杨森楠.造山带结构与演化的现代理论和研究方法-东秦岭造山带剖析.武汉:中国地质大 学出版社,1991
[71]叶连俊,钱祥麟,张国伟,等.秦岭造山带学术讨论会论文选集.西安: 西北大学出版社,1991
[72]殷鸿福,杨逢清,赖旭龙,等.秦岭三叠纪分带及印支期发展史.现代地质,1988,2(3)
[73]殷鸿福、杨逢清、黄其胜,等.秦岭及邻区三叠系.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992
[74]殷鸿福等.中国古生物地理学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988
[75]曾广策,赖旭龙,杨逢清.四川九寨沟隆康、漳扎火山岩研究.地质科技情报,2002,21(3):7-12
[76] 曾宜君 , 杨学俊,李云泉 . 川西前陆盆地南部中新生代砾岩的构造意义 . 四川地质学报,2004,24(4):198-201
[77]翟光明,宋建国,靳久强.板块构造演化与含油气盆地的形成和评价.北京:石油工业出版社,2002
[78]张东旭.西秦岭礼崛前陆盆地构造演化及变形分析. 矿产与地质,2002,16(5):273-276
[79]张国伟,孟庆任,余在平,等.秦岭造山带的造山过程及其动力学特征.中国科学(D 辑),1996
[80]张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚,等.秦岭造山带与大陆动力地质学,北京:科学出版社,2001
[81]张国伟等.秦岭造山带的形成与演化,西安:西北大学出版社,1987
[82]张箭,徐强,廖仕孟.川西龙门山前陆盆地构造沉降初步分析.沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(4):67-72
[83]张廷山,陈晓慧,边立曾.大地构造对上扬子区志留纪生物礁分布及发育的控制.沉积学报,1996,14(4):84-93
[84]张以佛.玉树构造带北缘下三叠统底界不整合面的发现及其构造意义.青海地质,1991(1):1-3
[85]张以弗.可可西里-巴颜喀拉三叠纪沉积盆地的形成和演化. 兰州:青海人民出版社,1994
[86]张瑜昌.中国含油气盆地分析.南京:南京大学出版社,1997
[87]中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队.喀喇昆仑山—昆仑山地区地质演化.北京:科学出版社,2000
[88]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.2002 年度松潘-阿坝 MT 重磁资料处理解释研究报告(内部),2003
[89]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.2002 年度松潘-阿坝地区油气地球化学概查成果报告(内部),2003
[90]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.2003年度松潘-阿坝MT、重磁力区域勘探资料解释报告(内部),2004
[91]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.松潘-阿坝地区地震层析成像与深部构造研究(内部),2004
[92]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.松潘-阿坝地区航磁及遥感资料处理解释研究(内部),2003
[93]中石化勘探开发研究院.松潘-阿坝地区油气勘探前景及规划部署研究(内部),2003
[94]钟大赉.滇川西部古特提斯造山带.北京:科学出版社,1998
[95]钟宏.松播-甘孜造山带中丹巴地区花岗岩、变质岩的成因和演化:[学位论文].南京:南京大学,1995.
[96]钟揩,徐鸣洁,王良书.川滇地区重力场特征与地壳变形研究.高校地质学报,2005,11(1):111-117
[97]周新源.前陆盆地油气分布规律.北京:石油工业出版社,2002
[98]朱鸿,万天丰.中国东部晚元古代—三叠纪古板块运动学研究.地球科学,1991,16(5)
[99]朱志澄. 构造地质学. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 2002
[100]A D 迈尔. 沉积盆地分析原理.孙枢等译. 北京:石油工业出版社,1991
[101]A.K.Dubey,S.S.Bhakuni.Development of extension faults on the oblique thrust ramp hanging wall: example from the Tethys Himalaya.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2004,23:427-434
[102]Allen P A and Allen J R. Basin Analysis – Principles and Applications. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1990: 1-305
[103]Allen P A, Homewood P, Williams G D. Foreland basin: an introduction. Allen P A. Foreland Basin. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1986. 3-12
[104]Anadon P, Cabrera L, Colombo F, et al. Syntectonic intra-formational unconformities in alluvial fan deposits, eastern Ebro basin margins (NE Spain) [A]. In: Allen P A, Homeward P, Williams G D. Foreland Basin [C]. Oxford London, Ed inburgh Boston Melbourne: Blackwen Scientific Publications, 1986, 259-271
[105]B.P.Singh,J.S.Pawar,S.K.Karlupia.Dense mineral data from the northwestern Himalayan foreland sedimentary rocks and recent river sediments: evaluation of the hinterland.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2004,23:25-35
[106]Bally A W, Snelson S. Realms of subsidence. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1980, 1: 9-75.
[107]Bally B A.地震褶皱带及有关盆地. 漆家福, 陆克政, 陈书平, 等译. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1995
[108]Bird P. Continental delamination and the Colarado plateau[J]. Geophys, 1979, 86: 891-903
[109]Boyer S E, Elliot D. Thrust system. A.A.P.G., 1982, 68(9): 1196-1230
[110]Burbank D W , Anderson R S.2001.Tectonic Geomorphology Blackwell Science,131-159
[111]Dahlstrom C D A.Structural geology in the Eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains,Bull.Canadian.Petroleum Geology,1970,18(3):332-406
[112]Dewey. Extensional collapse orogens . Tectonics, 1988, 7(6): 1123-1139
[113]Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimention[A]. In: Dickinson W R, eds. Tectonics and sedimention. SEMP Special Publication, 1974, 22: 3-9.
[114]England P C ,Molnar P. 1990. Right-lateral shear and rotation as the explanation for strike-slip faulting in eastern Tibet. Nature,344:140-142.
[115]England P, Molnar P. The field of crustal velocity in Asia calculated from Quaternary rates of slip on faults.Geophys.J.Int.,1997,130:551-582.
[116]England P,Houseman G A. Finite strain calculations of continental deformation and Comparision with the India-Asia collision. J.Geophys.Res.,1986,91:3664-3677.
[117]England P,Molnar P. Right-lateral shear and rotation as the explanation for strike–slip faulting in eastern Tibet.Nature,1990,344:141-142.
[118]Enkin R J.1991. The stationary Cretaceous paleomagnetic pole of Sichuan(south China block). Tectonics,10(3):547-559.
[119]Fanchen Kong.Continental margin deformation analysis and reconstruction-Evolution of the East China Sea Basin and adjacent plate interaction.USA:the University of Texas at Austin,1998
[120]Galbraith R F, Laslett G M. Statistical models for mixed fission track ages [J]. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurement, 1993, 21(4): 459-470
[121]Gleadow A J W, Doddy I R, Green P F, et al. Confined Fission Track Lengths in Apatite: A Diagnostic Tool for Thermal History Analysis[J]. Contrib. Mineral Petrol., 1986, 94: 405-415
[122]Green P F, Duddy I R, Gleadow A J W, et al. Thermal Annealing of Fission Tracks in Apatite: 4. Quantitative Modelling Techniques and Extension to Geological Timescales[J]. Chem. Geol., 1989, 79: 155-182
[123]Green P F. A New Look at Statistic in Fission Track Dating[J]. Nucl. Tracks., 1981, 5: 77-86
[124]Harding T P, Lowell J D. Structural styles: their plate tectonic habitats and hydrocarbon traps in petroleum provinces. A.A.P.G., 1979, 63: 1016-1058
[125]Hsu K J ,Pan G ,Sengor A M C,et al.Tectonic Evolution of Tibet and the Himalayas.Int Geol Review,1995,37:473-508
[126]Kingston D R, Dishroon C P, Williams P A. Global basin Classification system[J]. AAPG. 1983,67(12): 2175-2193
[127]Kocyigit Ali. Altiner Demir.Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the north Anatolian palaeorift (NAPR);Hettangian-Aptian passive continental margin of the northern Neo-Tethys, Turkey. [Serial] Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 11;3, Pages 169-191. 2002.
[128]Lister,G.S.et al.,1986,Detachment Fault and Evolution of Passive Continental Margins,Geology,Vol.14,No.3
[129]M.R.W. Johnson.Shortening budgets and the role of continental subduction during the India–Asia collision.Earth-Science Reviews 59 (2002) 101–123
[130]Marshall Reiter.A Note Comparing Parameters Controlling Low-Angle Normal and Thrust Movement.Journal of Structural Ceology,1997,19(1):99-106
[131]Merren Alison Jones.Interaction between proximal foreland basin sedimentation and the structural evolution of the Catalan Coastal Range, near Gandesa, Catalunya, Spain.thr University of Wyoming,1997
[132]Nelson BK, DePaolo D J.1988.Comparison of isotopic and petrographic provenance indicators in sediments from Tertiary continental basins of New Mexico.J.Sedi.Petrol.,58:348-357
[133]O'Nions R K, Hamilton P J. Hooker P J.1983.A Nd isotope investigation of sediments related to crustal development in the British Isles.EarthPlanet.Sci.Lett.,63:229-240
[134]P.M.Myrow,N.C.Hughes,T.S.Paulsen.Integrated tectonostratigraphic analysis of the Himalaya and implications for its tectonic reconstruction.Earth and Planetary Science Letters 212(200):433-441
[135]S. Vandyckea,F.Bergerat.Brittle Tectonic Structures and Palaeostress Analysis in the Isle of Wight,Wessex basin, southern U.K.Journal of Structural Ceology,2001,23:393-406
[136]Scrocca Davide. Carminati Eugenio. Doglioni Carlo. Deep structure of the Southern Apennines, Italy;thin-skinned or thick-skinned?.Tectonics. 24;3, 2005
[137]Sengor A M C .Tectonics of the Tethysides:Orogenic Collision Development in a Collisional Setting. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci,1987,15:213-224.
[138]Sengor A M C.1985. East Asia Tectonic Collage.Nature,(318):16-17
[139]Sengor A M C.1987. Tectonic subdivisions and evolution of Asia.Bulletin of Technic University, Istambul, (40):355-435.
[140]Sengor A M C.The Cimmerides Orogenic System and the Tectonic of Eurasia.geol. Soc.Amer.,spec.paper. 1984.198.
[141]Spencer,J.E.,1984,Role of Tectonic Denudation in Warping and Uplifting of Low-Angle Normal Faults,Geology,Vol.12,No.1
[142]Thomas William A.Mushwad:Ductile duplex in the Appalachian trust belt in Alabama.AAPG Bulletin,2001.85(10):1847-1869
[143]Turcotte D L, Schubert G.. Geodynamics – application of continuum physics to geologic problem [M]. NewYork: John Wiley, 1982: 1-450
[144]Wang Jinqi.Relationship between Tectonic Evolution and Hydrocarbon in the Foreland of the Longmen Mountains.Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences,1996,13(3-5):327-226
[145]Wrede V.Thrusting in a folded regime: fold accommodation faults in the Ruhr Basin, Germany. Journal of Structural Geology.2005,27(5):789-803
[146]Xu J F, Wu Q, Yu X Y.Geochemistry of high-Mg andesites and adakitic andeaite from the Sanchazi Block of the Mian-Lue ophiolitic melange in the Qinling Mountains,central China:Evidence of partial melting of the subducted Paleo-tethy an crust.Geochemical Journal, 2002, 34:359-377
[147]DIRKS P H C M,WILSON C J L,CHES S,et al.Tectonic evolution of the NE margin of the Tibetan plateau:evidence from the central Longmen mountains Sichuan Province,China[A].罗志立.龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1994.230-248.
[148]WORLEY B A, WILSON C J L, LIU S,et al.Structral obscrvation from Wenchuan-Mouwen metamorphic belt,Longmen mountains,China[A].罗志立.龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994.265-284.
[2]蔡立国.青藏高原东部石油地质基本特征.南京:南京大学出版社,1993
[3]曹宣铎,胡云绪,赵江天,等.秦岭石炭纪裂陷盆地的沉积构造演化.西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1994
[4]陈炳蔚,王恺元,刘万熹,等.怒江-斓沧江-金沙江地区大地构造.北京:地质出版社,1987
[5]陈炳蔚.三江地区主要大地构造问题及其成矿的关系.北京:地质出版社,1991
[6]陈发景,汪新文.盆地构造分析与油气勘探. 勘探家,1996,1(1):25-28
[7]陈发景,张光亚,陈昭年. 不整合分析及其在陆相盆地构造研究中的意义.现代地质,2004,18(3):269-275
[8]陈景达.板块构造大陆边缘与含油气盆地.山东:石油大学出版社,1989
[9]陈玉禄,侯浩,杨更.康滇地轴中段西缘二叠纪火山岩岩石地球化学特征.四川地质学,1999,19(1):22-25
[10]冯益民,曹宣铎,张二朋.西秦岭造山带结构造山过程及动力学.西安:西安地图出版社,2002
[11]郭正吾,等.四川盆地的形成与演化.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994
[12]昊香尧.岩组学导论.重庆:重庆出版社,1986
[13]胡世华.川西义敦岛弧的火山-沉积作用.北京:地质出版社,1992
[14]胡新伟,邓江红.龙门山中段推覆构造带构造特征.成都理工学院学报,1996,23(3):101-106
[15]黄汲清,陈炳蔚.中国及邻区特提斯的演化.北京:地质出版社,1987
[16] 姜琦刚 . 四川若尔盖北部寒武 -奥陶系太阳顶群沉积环境分析 . 长春地质学院学报,1994,24(3):271-277
[17]李昌年.火成岩微量元素岩石学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992
[18]李晋僧.秦岭显生宙古海盆沉积和演化史.北京:地质出版社,1994
[19]李秋生,彭苏萍,高锐.青藏高原北部巴颜喀拉构造带基底隆起的地震学证据.地质通报,2003,22(10):782-788
[20]李曙光,侯振辉,杨永成.南秦岭勉略构造带三岔子古岩浆弧的地球化学特征及形成时代.中国科学,2003,33(12):1163-1173
[21]李勇,A L DENSMOREZ,周荣军,等.青藏高原东缘龙门山晚新生代剥蚀厚度与弹性挠曲模拟.地质学报,2005,79(5):608-615
[22]李勇,侯中健,司光影,等.青藏高原东缘新生代构造层序与构造事件.中国地质,2002,29(1):30-36
[23]李勇,曾允孚.龙门山逆冲推覆作用的地层标识.成都理工学院报,1995,22(2):1-10
[24]林茂炳,马永旺.论龙门山彭灌杂岩体的构造属性.成都理工学院学报,1995,22(1):42-46
[25]林茂炳,吴山.龙门山推覆构造变形特征.成都理工学院学报,1991,18(1)
[26]凌洪飞,沈渭洲,章邦桐,等.江西修水地区震旦纪前后沉积岩的 Nd 同位素组成和物质来源.岩石学报,1992.8(2):190-194
[27]刘宝珺,许效松,夏文杰等.中国南方岩相古地理图集.北京:科学出版社,1994
[28]刘朝基.川西藏东特提斯地质.四川:西南交通大学出版社,1996
[29] 刘 文 均 , 郑 荣 才 , 李 祥 辉 . 龙 门 山 泥 盆 纪 沉 积 盆 地 的 古 地 理 和 古 构 造 重 建 . 地 质 学报,1999,73(2):109-120
[30]刘增乾,徐宪,潘桂棠,等.青藏高原大地构造形成与演化.北京:地质出版社,1990
[31]龙学明.龙门山中北段地史发展的若干问题.成都地质学院学报.1991,78(1):8-76
[32]陆克政,朱筱敏,漆家福. 含油气盆地分析. 北京:石油大学出版社,2001,1-424
[33]罗建宁.三江特提斯沉积地质与成矿.北京:地质出版社,1992
[34]罗志立,等.龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化.成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994
[35]马杏垣,索书田.论滑覆及岩石圈内多层次滑脱构造.地质学报,1984,58(3)
[36]马永生、梅冥相.碳酸盐岩储层沉积学.北京:地质出版社,1999
[37]马永旺,林茂炳,王国芝.彭灌断裂带的构造特征.成都理工学院学报,1994,21(3):14-19
[38]马永旺,王国芝,胡新伟.“彭灌杂岩”推覆体的构造变形特征.四川地质学报,1996,16(2):110-104
[39]马永旺,杨尽.龙门山中段推覆构造的变形特征.成都理工学院学报,2001,28(3):236-240
[40]彭军,陈洪德,曾允孚.龙门山南段前陆盆地中—新生代砂岩特征及物源分析.中国区域地质,2000,19(1):77-84
[41]秦克令.陕、甘、川交界处摩天岭区碧口群层序及时代划分,中国地质科学院西安地质矿产研究所所刊第 30 号,西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1990
[42]邱家骧.应用岩浆岩岩石学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991
[43]沈渭洲,陆怀鹏,徐士进等.丹巴地区变质沉积岩 Sm—Nd 同位素研究,地质学报,1998,33(3)
[44]四川省地质矿产局.四川省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1991
[45]宋志高.北秦岭-北祁连(天水-宝鸡间)早古生代火山岩系及其构造连接关系研究,中国地质科学院西安地质矿产研究所所刊,第 24 号,西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1991
[46]田在艺,张庆春. 中国含油气沉积盆地. 北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[47]万天丰.中国大地构造学纲要.北京:地质出版社,2004
[48]汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探.北京:地质出版社,2002
[49]王椿镛,韩渭宾,吴建平,等.松潘一甘孜造山带地壳速度结构.地震学报,2003.25(3):229-241
[50]王二七,孟庆任,陈智梁,等.龙门山断裂带印支期左旋走滑运动及其大地构造成因.地学前缘,2001,8(2):375-384
[51]王海燕.若尔盖盆地与西秦岭造山带岩石圈结构与地球动力学过程-深地震反射剖面技术在造山带研究中的应用[博士学位论文].北京:中国地质科学院,2005
[52]王鸿祯.中国古地理图集.北京:地图出版社,1985
[53]王小亚,朱文耀,符养.GPS 监测的中国及其周边现时地壳形变. 地球物理学报,2002,45(2):198-209
[54]王永诚.油气储层评价,北京:石油工业出版社,1999
[55]王有学,钱辉.青海东部地壳速度结构特征研究.地学前缘.2000.7(4):568-579
[56]王宗秀,许志琴,杨天南.松潘—甘孜滑脱型山链变形构造演化模式.地质科学,1997,32(3):327-336
[57]吴运高,李继亮.造山带逆冲推覆构造研究的主要新进展.地球科学进展,2000,15(4):426-433
[58]肖序常,李廷栋.青藏高原的构造演化与隆升机制.广东:广东科技出版社,2000
[59]谢启兴,何文劲,陈明.平武地区中生代花岗岩类的演化特征及其成因意义.四川地质学报,2000,20(2):93-99
[60]徐常芳.中国大陆岩石圈结构、盆地构造和油气运移探讨.地学前缘,2003,10(4):115-127
[61]徐士进,王汝成,沈渭洲,等.松潘-甘孜造山带中晋宁期花岗岩的 U-Pb 和 RbSr 同位素定年及其大地构造意义.中国科学(D 辑), 1996,26(1):52-58
[62]许继峰,王强.Adakitic 火成岩对大陆地壳增厚过程的指示:以青藏北部火山岩为例.地学前缘,2003,10(4):401-406
[63]许效松,徐强,潘桂棠,等.中国南大陆演化与全球古地理对比.北京:地质出版社. 1996
[64]许志琴,崔军文.大陆山链变形构造动力学.北京:冶金工业出版社,1996
[65]许志琴,侯立伟,王大可等.1990.中国西南松潘一甘孜中生代碰撞型造山带的薄壳构造及前陆逆冲系.中国地质科学院院报 20 号.126-129
[66]许志琴,侯立伟,王宗秀,等.中国松播—甘孜造山带的造山过程.北京:地质出版社,1992
[67]闫全人,王宗起,闫臻等.碧口群火山岩的时代—SHRIMP 锆石 U-Pb 测年结果.地质通报, 2003,22(6)
[68]杨逢清.松潘甘孜地块与秦岭褶皱带、扬子地台的关系及其发展史,地质学报,1994 年,68(3)
[69]杨恒书,赖旭龙,杨逢清等.四川隆康、塔藏含火山岩地层时代新证据.中国区域地质,1995,No.1:71-75
[70]杨巍然,杨森楠.造山带结构与演化的现代理论和研究方法-东秦岭造山带剖析.武汉:中国地质大 学出版社,1991
[71]叶连俊,钱祥麟,张国伟,等.秦岭造山带学术讨论会论文选集.西安: 西北大学出版社,1991
[72]殷鸿福,杨逢清,赖旭龙,等.秦岭三叠纪分带及印支期发展史.现代地质,1988,2(3)
[73]殷鸿福、杨逢清、黄其胜,等.秦岭及邻区三叠系.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992
[74]殷鸿福等.中国古生物地理学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988
[75]曾广策,赖旭龙,杨逢清.四川九寨沟隆康、漳扎火山岩研究.地质科技情报,2002,21(3):7-12
[76] 曾宜君 , 杨学俊,李云泉 . 川西前陆盆地南部中新生代砾岩的构造意义 . 四川地质学报,2004,24(4):198-201
[77]翟光明,宋建国,靳久强.板块构造演化与含油气盆地的形成和评价.北京:石油工业出版社,2002
[78]张东旭.西秦岭礼崛前陆盆地构造演化及变形分析. 矿产与地质,2002,16(5):273-276
[79]张国伟,孟庆任,余在平,等.秦岭造山带的造山过程及其动力学特征.中国科学(D 辑),1996
[80]张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚,等.秦岭造山带与大陆动力地质学,北京:科学出版社,2001
[81]张国伟等.秦岭造山带的形成与演化,西安:西北大学出版社,1987
[82]张箭,徐强,廖仕孟.川西龙门山前陆盆地构造沉降初步分析.沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(4):67-72
[83]张廷山,陈晓慧,边立曾.大地构造对上扬子区志留纪生物礁分布及发育的控制.沉积学报,1996,14(4):84-93
[84]张以佛.玉树构造带北缘下三叠统底界不整合面的发现及其构造意义.青海地质,1991(1):1-3
[85]张以弗.可可西里-巴颜喀拉三叠纪沉积盆地的形成和演化. 兰州:青海人民出版社,1994
[86]张瑜昌.中国含油气盆地分析.南京:南京大学出版社,1997
[87]中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队.喀喇昆仑山—昆仑山地区地质演化.北京:科学出版社,2000
[88]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.2002 年度松潘-阿坝 MT 重磁资料处理解释研究报告(内部),2003
[89]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.2002 年度松潘-阿坝地区油气地球化学概查成果报告(内部),2003
[90]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.2003年度松潘-阿坝MT、重磁力区域勘探资料解释报告(内部),2004
[91]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.松潘-阿坝地区地震层析成像与深部构造研究(内部),2004
[92]中石化南方勘探开发分公司.松潘-阿坝地区航磁及遥感资料处理解释研究(内部),2003
[93]中石化勘探开发研究院.松潘-阿坝地区油气勘探前景及规划部署研究(内部),2003
[94]钟大赉.滇川西部古特提斯造山带.北京:科学出版社,1998
[95]钟宏.松播-甘孜造山带中丹巴地区花岗岩、变质岩的成因和演化:[学位论文].南京:南京大学,1995.
[96]钟揩,徐鸣洁,王良书.川滇地区重力场特征与地壳变形研究.高校地质学报,2005,11(1):111-117
[97]周新源.前陆盆地油气分布规律.北京:石油工业出版社,2002
[98]朱鸿,万天丰.中国东部晚元古代—三叠纪古板块运动学研究.地球科学,1991,16(5)
[99]朱志澄. 构造地质学. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 2002
[100]A D 迈尔. 沉积盆地分析原理.孙枢等译. 北京:石油工业出版社,1991
[101]A.K.Dubey,S.S.Bhakuni.Development of extension faults on the oblique thrust ramp hanging wall: example from the Tethys Himalaya.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2004,23:427-434
[102]Allen P A and Allen J R. Basin Analysis – Principles and Applications. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1990: 1-305
[103]Allen P A, Homewood P, Williams G D. Foreland basin: an introduction. Allen P A. Foreland Basin. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1986. 3-12
[104]Anadon P, Cabrera L, Colombo F, et al. Syntectonic intra-formational unconformities in alluvial fan deposits, eastern Ebro basin margins (NE Spain) [A]. In: Allen P A, Homeward P, Williams G D. Foreland Basin [C]. Oxford London, Ed inburgh Boston Melbourne: Blackwen Scientific Publications, 1986, 259-271
[105]B.P.Singh,J.S.Pawar,S.K.Karlupia.Dense mineral data from the northwestern Himalayan foreland sedimentary rocks and recent river sediments: evaluation of the hinterland.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2004,23:25-35
[106]Bally A W, Snelson S. Realms of subsidence. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1980, 1: 9-75.
[107]Bally B A.地震褶皱带及有关盆地. 漆家福, 陆克政, 陈书平, 等译. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1995
[108]Bird P. Continental delamination and the Colarado plateau[J]. Geophys, 1979, 86: 891-903
[109]Boyer S E, Elliot D. Thrust system. A.A.P.G., 1982, 68(9): 1196-1230
[110]Burbank D W , Anderson R S.2001.Tectonic Geomorphology Blackwell Science,131-159
[111]Dahlstrom C D A.Structural geology in the Eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains,Bull.Canadian.Petroleum Geology,1970,18(3):332-406
[112]Dewey. Extensional collapse orogens . Tectonics, 1988, 7(6): 1123-1139
[113]Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimention[A]. In: Dickinson W R, eds. Tectonics and sedimention. SEMP Special Publication, 1974, 22: 3-9.
[114]England P C ,Molnar P. 1990. Right-lateral shear and rotation as the explanation for strike-slip faulting in eastern Tibet. Nature,344:140-142.
[115]England P, Molnar P. The field of crustal velocity in Asia calculated from Quaternary rates of slip on faults.Geophys.J.Int.,1997,130:551-582.
[116]England P,Houseman G A. Finite strain calculations of continental deformation and Comparision with the India-Asia collision. J.Geophys.Res.,1986,91:3664-3677.
[117]England P,Molnar P. Right-lateral shear and rotation as the explanation for strike–slip faulting in eastern Tibet.Nature,1990,344:141-142.
[118]Enkin R J.1991. The stationary Cretaceous paleomagnetic pole of Sichuan(south China block). Tectonics,10(3):547-559.
[119]Fanchen Kong.Continental margin deformation analysis and reconstruction-Evolution of the East China Sea Basin and adjacent plate interaction.USA:the University of Texas at Austin,1998
[120]Galbraith R F, Laslett G M. Statistical models for mixed fission track ages [J]. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurement, 1993, 21(4): 459-470
[121]Gleadow A J W, Doddy I R, Green P F, et al. Confined Fission Track Lengths in Apatite: A Diagnostic Tool for Thermal History Analysis[J]. Contrib. Mineral Petrol., 1986, 94: 405-415
[122]Green P F, Duddy I R, Gleadow A J W, et al. Thermal Annealing of Fission Tracks in Apatite: 4. Quantitative Modelling Techniques and Extension to Geological Timescales[J]. Chem. Geol., 1989, 79: 155-182
[123]Green P F. A New Look at Statistic in Fission Track Dating[J]. Nucl. Tracks., 1981, 5: 77-86
[124]Harding T P, Lowell J D. Structural styles: their plate tectonic habitats and hydrocarbon traps in petroleum provinces. A.A.P.G., 1979, 63: 1016-1058
[125]Hsu K J ,Pan G ,Sengor A M C,et al.Tectonic Evolution of Tibet and the Himalayas.Int Geol Review,1995,37:473-508
[126]Kingston D R, Dishroon C P, Williams P A. Global basin Classification system[J]. AAPG. 1983,67(12): 2175-2193
[127]Kocyigit Ali. Altiner Demir.Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the north Anatolian palaeorift (NAPR);Hettangian-Aptian passive continental margin of the northern Neo-Tethys, Turkey. [Serial] Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 11;3, Pages 169-191. 2002.
[128]Lister,G.S.et al.,1986,Detachment Fault and Evolution of Passive Continental Margins,Geology,Vol.14,No.3
[129]M.R.W. Johnson.Shortening budgets and the role of continental subduction during the India–Asia collision.Earth-Science Reviews 59 (2002) 101–123
[130]Marshall Reiter.A Note Comparing Parameters Controlling Low-Angle Normal and Thrust Movement.Journal of Structural Ceology,1997,19(1):99-106
[131]Merren Alison Jones.Interaction between proximal foreland basin sedimentation and the structural evolution of the Catalan Coastal Range, near Gandesa, Catalunya, Spain.thr University of Wyoming,1997
[132]Nelson BK, DePaolo D J.1988.Comparison of isotopic and petrographic provenance indicators in sediments from Tertiary continental basins of New Mexico.J.Sedi.Petrol.,58:348-357
[133]O'Nions R K, Hamilton P J. Hooker P J.1983.A Nd isotope investigation of sediments related to crustal development in the British Isles.EarthPlanet.Sci.Lett.,63:229-240
[134]P.M.Myrow,N.C.Hughes,T.S.Paulsen.Integrated tectonostratigraphic analysis of the Himalaya and implications for its tectonic reconstruction.Earth and Planetary Science Letters 212(200):433-441
[135]S. Vandyckea,F.Bergerat.Brittle Tectonic Structures and Palaeostress Analysis in the Isle of Wight,Wessex basin, southern U.K.Journal of Structural Ceology,2001,23:393-406
[136]Scrocca Davide. Carminati Eugenio. Doglioni Carlo. Deep structure of the Southern Apennines, Italy;thin-skinned or thick-skinned?.Tectonics. 24;3, 2005
[137]Sengor A M C .Tectonics of the Tethysides:Orogenic Collision Development in a Collisional Setting. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci,1987,15:213-224.
[138]Sengor A M C.1985. East Asia Tectonic Collage.Nature,(318):16-17
[139]Sengor A M C.1987. Tectonic subdivisions and evolution of Asia.Bulletin of Technic University, Istambul, (40):355-435.
[140]Sengor A M C.The Cimmerides Orogenic System and the Tectonic of Eurasia.geol. Soc.Amer.,spec.paper. 1984.198.
[141]Spencer,J.E.,1984,Role of Tectonic Denudation in Warping and Uplifting of Low-Angle Normal Faults,Geology,Vol.12,No.1
[142]Thomas William A.Mushwad:Ductile duplex in the Appalachian trust belt in Alabama.AAPG Bulletin,2001.85(10):1847-1869
[143]Turcotte D L, Schubert G.. Geodynamics – application of continuum physics to geologic problem [M]. NewYork: John Wiley, 1982: 1-450
[144]Wang Jinqi.Relationship between Tectonic Evolution and Hydrocarbon in the Foreland of the Longmen Mountains.Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences,1996,13(3-5):327-226
[145]Wrede V.Thrusting in a folded regime: fold accommodation faults in the Ruhr Basin, Germany. Journal of Structural Geology.2005,27(5):789-803
[146]Xu J F, Wu Q, Yu X Y.Geochemistry of high-Mg andesites and adakitic andeaite from the Sanchazi Block of the Mian-Lue ophiolitic melange in the Qinling Mountains,central China:Evidence of partial melting of the subducted Paleo-tethy an crust.Geochemical Journal, 2002, 34:359-377
[147]DIRKS P H C M,WILSON C J L,CHES S,et al.Tectonic evolution of the NE margin of the Tibetan plateau:evidence from the central Longmen mountains Sichuan Province,China[A].罗志立.龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1994.230-248.
[148]WORLEY B A, WILSON C J L, LIU S,et al.Structral obscrvation from Wenchuan-Mouwen metamorphic belt,Longmen mountains,China[A].罗志立.龙门山造山带的崛起和四川盆地的形成与演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1994.265-284.