新《课标》要求下南岸区七年级学生——英语学习策略调查与训练
摘要
随着新一轮课程改革的推进，重庆市南岸区(以下简称我区)作为第三批国家级实验区于2003年9月开始了贯彻国家《英语课程标准》(实验稿)(本文简称新《课标》)精神，实验新教材《新目标英语》(Go for it!)(人民教育出版社与美国汤姆森出版集团合作编写)的教学改革与实验。本研究在我区全面开展新《课标》要求下的七年级学生英语学习的调查，在调查的基础上开展把学习策略的训练与日常教学内容结合起来的训练。
本研究通过问卷调查了我区四所有代表意义的中学义务教育七年级学生的英语学习策略使用情况，旨在为七年级英语学习策略的研究，学习策略的训练以及实验新教材和改革外语教学提供重要依据和启示。该问卷依据文秋芳的英语学习策略系统，包括三个部分即：个人学习背景；英语学习观念；七年级英语学习策略问卷(二级、五级目标)。调查结果借助spss统计软件，结果分析如下：
1．七年级学生学习英语的背景相当复杂，英语学习的能力参差不齐，很不适应七年级英语学习。因此应当更加关注学生的学习方式，学习策略的研究非常重要。
2．学习观念的调查结果显示七年级学生大多数还是非常依赖教师的课堂教学，也不善于进行自我管理。因此，一开始就树立七年级学生正确的英语学习观念，
逐步培养他们具有自主学习的能力。
3.新《课标》要求下的二级、五级目标学习策略调查是本调查的重点。学习
策略调查结果显示，七年级学生的学习策略能力相当有限，英语学习策略能力普
遍偏低。因此要重新激发学生英语学习兴趣，养成基本学习习惯，提高策略意识
和策略使用能力。
4.学优生与学困生的学习策略使用情况对比分析:此研究部分验证了专家的
某些观点:即学优生多数是学习策略的使用高手(文秋芳，1998)。其目的是要宣
传学优生有效的学习策略，形成互助的学习氛围，帮助大面积的学生形成有效的
学习策略。
根据以上调查结果，本研究在七年级学生中开展了英语学习策略的集中、分散
和个别训练，特别是把学习策略与日常教学结合起来的实证研究，得出了以下几
条经验:
1.提高师生的学生策略意识是学习策略训练的关键。七年级学生的学习策略
训练主要依靠与所学英语知识的结合，这也是本研究训练学生英语学习策略的重
要措施，收到了良好的效果。
2.英语学生策略训练必须师生共同参与，教师加强策略意识和策略能力的提
高，精心备课并进行及时的教学反思。学生要加强合作，通过小组交流等形式，
学习他人的经验并经常反思策略的使用情况且及时与教师交流，以求得教与学的
互相促进。
3.通过一学期的七年级学生英语学习策略的训练，师生均达成共识:学习策
略训练首先能够让学习者明白自己学习的目的，管理好自己的学习过程，从而提
高自己的学习成绩，有利于逐步形成自主学习的能力，为更进一步的英语学习打
下良好的基础。
本研究尚存许多不足之处，例如:样本量不够大，数据的获得所采用的分析手
段单一等等，有关实验数据和训练方法还有待于更进一步验证和完善。本研究实
验周期会持续下去，接受实验的师生面会扩大，希望得到各位专家的进一步指导。
了
Along with development of the national educational reform, Nan'an District in Chongqing (referred to hereafter as "my district"), as one of the Third Pilot Group of the National Education Experimental Areas, started in Spring 2003 a trial project to implement the National English Curriculum Standard (referred to hereafter as NECS) and to use a new series of Textbook Go For It, collaboratively produced by PEP, China and Thomson, USA.
This thesis reports a study conducted in four representative schools in Nan'an District, focusing on the English learning strategy among the students in Year 7. The investigation applied the questionnaire, composed by Wen (2003) with three aspects: learners' background, learners' beliefs, and Year 7 students' learning strategies (Objectives of Level 2 and Level 5 in NECS). The data was analyzed under the assistant of SPSS. The findings are as follows:
1. Because of the influence of their English learning in primary schools, students in
Year 7 started the junior study with very complicated backgrounds. Most of them found it quite difficult to get used to the English teaching and learning in middle schools. Therefore, it is very important to justify our teaching methods, and more attention should be put on learners' needs.
2. The study on learners' beliefs indicated that the majority of the students still depended greatly on the teacher's classroom teaching. Therefore, at the very beginning, it is necessary to develop and work with the students' beliefs. It is the students themselves who must be responsible for their study. We should produce autonomous learners who can not only increase their knowledge but also know how to manage their own learning.
3. The most important part of the study is to focus on learning strategies at Level 2 and Level 5, under the requirement of NEC S. The result indicated that the average use of learning strategy was quite limited. Most of them even did not form their positive learning habits. Therefore, learner training at the beginning is important.
4. The comparison analysis between good learners and the learners with difficulties on use of learning strategies partly verified the expert's some standpoints: the good language learners are better learning strategy users. (Wen, 1998) Therefore, it is important to work with the students the effective learning strategies and conduct learner training.
According to the above findings, this study conducted learner training among the Year 7 students, in the ways of intensive training, group training, and individual training. The findings from the training provide us with the following implications:
1. The key point in learner training should first of all develop the positive attitude of both the teachers and the students on learning strategy. It is an effective way to embed the learning strategies with the daily language teaching and learning. This study has been proved with good result.
2. It is important to involve both the teachers and the learners in the strategy training. The teachers must develop their understanding in learning strategies, prepare and conduct strategy-embedded-lessons, and reflect on their teaching actions. The learners should also work collaboratively with the teachers and among themselves, so that the full
involvement of both teachers and students is encouraged and promoted.
3. After the trial on learner training for one term, we realized that the students had become more aware of their learning and become a better manager in their own studying. It also indicates that it is possible to develop the students toward the ideal learner autonomy. This will lay a good foundation for their future English learning.
In the last part of the report, the limitations as well as possible pedagogical implications are also discussed. The first limitation is that the sample selection in this investigation is relatively small. Secondly, multiple data collation and analysis techniques are needed. As a follow-up, more studies will be conducted in wider areas in the futur
本研究通过问卷调查了我区四所有代表意义的中学义务教育七年级学生的英语学习策略使用情况，旨在为七年级英语学习策略的研究，学习策略的训练以及实验新教材和改革外语教学提供重要依据和启示。该问卷依据文秋芳的英语学习策略系统，包括三个部分即：个人学习背景；英语学习观念；七年级英语学习策略问卷(二级、五级目标)。调查结果借助spss统计软件，结果分析如下：
1．七年级学生学习英语的背景相当复杂，英语学习的能力参差不齐，很不适应七年级英语学习。因此应当更加关注学生的学习方式，学习策略的研究非常重要。
2．学习观念的调查结果显示七年级学生大多数还是非常依赖教师的课堂教学，也不善于进行自我管理。因此，一开始就树立七年级学生正确的英语学习观念，
逐步培养他们具有自主学习的能力。
3.新《课标》要求下的二级、五级目标学习策略调查是本调查的重点。学习
策略调查结果显示，七年级学生的学习策略能力相当有限，英语学习策略能力普
遍偏低。因此要重新激发学生英语学习兴趣，养成基本学习习惯，提高策略意识
和策略使用能力。
4.学优生与学困生的学习策略使用情况对比分析:此研究部分验证了专家的
某些观点:即学优生多数是学习策略的使用高手(文秋芳，1998)。其目的是要宣
传学优生有效的学习策略，形成互助的学习氛围，帮助大面积的学生形成有效的
学习策略。
根据以上调查结果，本研究在七年级学生中开展了英语学习策略的集中、分散
和个别训练，特别是把学习策略与日常教学结合起来的实证研究，得出了以下几
条经验:
1.提高师生的学生策略意识是学习策略训练的关键。七年级学生的学习策略
训练主要依靠与所学英语知识的结合，这也是本研究训练学生英语学习策略的重
要措施，收到了良好的效果。
2.英语学生策略训练必须师生共同参与，教师加强策略意识和策略能力的提
高，精心备课并进行及时的教学反思。学生要加强合作，通过小组交流等形式，
学习他人的经验并经常反思策略的使用情况且及时与教师交流，以求得教与学的
互相促进。
3.通过一学期的七年级学生英语学习策略的训练，师生均达成共识:学习策
略训练首先能够让学习者明白自己学习的目的，管理好自己的学习过程，从而提
高自己的学习成绩，有利于逐步形成自主学习的能力，为更进一步的英语学习打
下良好的基础。
本研究尚存许多不足之处，例如:样本量不够大，数据的获得所采用的分析手
段单一等等，有关实验数据和训练方法还有待于更进一步验证和完善。本研究实
验周期会持续下去，接受实验的师生面会扩大，希望得到各位专家的进一步指导。
了
Along with development of the national educational reform, Nan'an District in Chongqing (referred to hereafter as "my district"), as one of the Third Pilot Group of the National Education Experimental Areas, started in Spring 2003 a trial project to implement the National English Curriculum Standard (referred to hereafter as NECS) and to use a new series of Textbook Go For It, collaboratively produced by PEP, China and Thomson, USA.
This thesis reports a study conducted in four representative schools in Nan'an District, focusing on the English learning strategy among the students in Year 7. The investigation applied the questionnaire, composed by Wen (2003) with three aspects: learners' background, learners' beliefs, and Year 7 students' learning strategies (Objectives of Level 2 and Level 5 in NECS). The data was analyzed under the assistant of SPSS. The findings are as follows:
1. Because of the influence of their English learning in primary schools, students in
Year 7 started the junior study with very complicated backgrounds. Most of them found it quite difficult to get used to the English teaching and learning in middle schools. Therefore, it is very important to justify our teaching methods, and more attention should be put on learners' needs.
2. The study on learners' beliefs indicated that the majority of the students still depended greatly on the teacher's classroom teaching. Therefore, at the very beginning, it is necessary to develop and work with the students' beliefs. It is the students themselves who must be responsible for their study. We should produce autonomous learners who can not only increase their knowledge but also know how to manage their own learning.
3. The most important part of the study is to focus on learning strategies at Level 2 and Level 5, under the requirement of NEC S. The result indicated that the average use of learning strategy was quite limited. Most of them even did not form their positive learning habits. Therefore, learner training at the beginning is important.
4. The comparison analysis between good learners and the learners with difficulties on use of learning strategies partly verified the expert's some standpoints: the good language learners are better learning strategy users. (Wen, 1998) Therefore, it is important to work with the students the effective learning strategies and conduct learner training.
According to the above findings, this study conducted learner training among the Year 7 students, in the ways of intensive training, group training, and individual training. The findings from the training provide us with the following implications:
1. The key point in learner training should first of all develop the positive attitude of both the teachers and the students on learning strategy. It is an effective way to embed the learning strategies with the daily language teaching and learning. This study has been proved with good result.
2. It is important to involve both the teachers and the learners in the strategy training. The teachers must develop their understanding in learning strategies, prepare and conduct strategy-embedded-lessons, and reflect on their teaching actions. The learners should also work collaboratively with the teachers and among themselves, so that the full
involvement of both teachers and students is encouraged and promoted.
3. After the trial on learner training for one term, we realized that the students had become more aware of their learning and become a better manager in their own studying. It also indicates that it is possible to develop the students toward the ideal learner autonomy. This will lay a good foundation for their future English learning.
In the last part of the report, the limitations as well as possible pedagogical implications are also discussed. The first limitation is that the sample selection in this investigation is relatively small. Secondly, multiple data collation and analysis techniques are needed. As a follow-up, more studies will be conducted in wider areas in the futur
引文
Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication Strategies: A Psychological Analysis of Secondlanguage Use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Prentice Hall Regents.
Chamot, A. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J.Rubin (eds). Learning Strategies in Language Learning. Prentice Hall.
Chamot, A. U. et al. (1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. NY: Longman.
Chen, S. Q. (1990). A Study of Communication Strategies in Interlanguage. Production by Chinese EFL Learners. Language Learning 40(20: 155-187).
Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in Learning aned Using a Second Language. London Longman.
Ellies, R. (1999) Understanding Second Language Acquisition, Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huang, Xiao-hua.(1984). An investigation of Learning Strategies in Oral Communication That Chinese EFL Learners in China Employ. Unpublished M.A. thesis in Chinese University in Hong Kong.
Huang X.H. & M. V. Naerssen. (1985). Learning Strategies for Oral Communication. Applied Linguistics 6: 287-307.
Krashen, S. (1987). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Littlewood, W. (2000) Communicative Language Teaching. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Michael J. Wallace, (2000). Action Research for Language Teachers. Beijing: PEP & Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Naiman, N. et al. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Research in Education Series No.7.Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Naiman, N. et al. (1996). The Good Language Learner. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Numan, D. (2000) Designing Tasks for Communicative Classroom, Beijing: PEP.
O'Malley, J. M. et al, (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning 35: 21-46.
O'Malley, J. & A. U. Chamot, (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
O'Malley, J. M. et al. (1985b). Learning strategy applications with students if English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly 19: 285-96.
Oxford, R. (1989). Use of Language Learning Strategies: A Syn-thesis of Studies with Implications for Teacher Training. System 17(2): 235-247.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. et al. (1990). Strategy training for language learners: six situational case studies and training model. Foreign Language Annals 22(3): 197-216
Oxford, R. (ed). (1996). Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-cultural perspectives (Technical Report 13). Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu HI.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9: 41-51.
Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 2(2): 117-31.
Rubin, J. (1987). Learning strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden. & J. Rubin (eds). Learning Strategies in Language Learning. Prentice Hall.
Rubin, J. & I. Thompson. (1994). How to Be a More Successful Language Learner. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Pulishers, Inc.
Stern, H, (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modem
Language Review 31: 304-18.
Weinstein, C. & R. Mayer. (1986). The Teaching of Learning Strategies. In Wittrock, M. (ed)Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. New York: Prentice Hall.
Weinstein, C. & R. Mayer. (1986). The teaching of learning Strategies. In M. Wittrock (ed). Handbook of Research on Teahcing.(3rd ed). New York: Macmillan.
Wendern, A. & J. Rubin (eds) (1987). Learning Strategies in Language Learning. Pretice Hall.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy: Planning and Implementing Learner Training for Language Learners. Prentice Hall Europe.
Wong—Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive ang Social strategies in sedond language acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertion, Standford University.
程晓堂、郑敏，2002，《英语学习策略》。北京：外语教育与研究出版社。
傅道春编著，2001，《新课程中教师行为的变化》，北京：首都师范大学出版社。
教育部基础教育司组织编写，2002，《英语课程标准解读》，北京：北京师范大学出版社。
郭平建、郝建风，2002，中学生使用英语学习策略的调查与分析，《中小学英语教学与研究》第2期。
胡春洞主编：1998，《英语教学法》，北京：高等教育出版社。
贾冠杰，2003，《外语教育心理学》。南宁：广西教育出版社。
贾连萍，2003，对英语词汇教学的几点思考，《中小学生外语教学》第9期。
胡竹菊，2002，中学生英语学习策略与英语习得的关系，《中小学英语教学与研究》第10期。
刘电芝主编，1999，《学习策略研究》，北京：人民教育出版社。
陆琦，2003，常用词汇学习策略影响词汇记忆的实验研究，《中小学生外语教学》第5期。
刘润清，1990，决定语言学习的几个因素，《外语教学与研究》第2期。
刘润清(与吴一安、P.Jeffery合著)，1993，中国英语本科素质调查报告，《外语教学与研究》第1期。
刘润清，1999，《外语教学中的科研方法》，外语教学与研究出版社。
罗宪达、尹世寅、周容：2003，《英语教学实施指南》，华中师范大学出版社。
马若文，2003，注重学习策略培训优化英语课堂教学，《中小学英语教学与研究》第5期。
潘海燕，2003，英语阅读策略与阅读理解相关研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》第11期。
束定芳、庄智象，1996，《现代外语教学：理论、实践与方法》，上海外语教育出版社。
苏远胜、张耀冰，2003，西方学习策略研究综述，《国外外语教育》，第3期。
谭晓瑛、魏立明，2002，大学英语学习策略培训研究，《外语界》第6期。
王虹，2002，高中起始阶段学生认知策略的研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》第5期。
王文宇，1998，观念、策略与英语词汇记忆，《外语教学与研究》第1期。
文秋芳，1995，英语成功者与不成功者在学习方法上的差异，《外语教学与研究》第3期。
文秋芳，1996a，传统和非传统学习方法与英语成绩的关系，《现代外语》第1期。
文秋芳，1996b，大学生英语学习策略变化的趋势及其特点，《外语与外语教学》第4期。
文秋芳、王海啸，1996b，学习者因素与大学英语四级考试成绩的关系，《外语教学与研究》第4期。
文秋芳，1996a，《英语学习策略论》，上海外语教育出版社。
吴本虎，1997，如何研究中小学外语学习策略：方法与手段，《中小学英语教学与研究》第5期。
吴增生，1994，值得研究的“学习者策略”的研究，《现代外语》第3期。
薛绍兰，2003，学习策略：应对初中英语教学，《重庆教育》第11期。
扬福生，2003，国内外语学习策略研究现状分析综述，《中小学英语教学与研究》第6期。
伊翠端，2003，小学生英语学习策略的现状分析，《中小学英语教学与研究》第4期。
朱纯，1994，《外语教学心理学》，上海外语教育出版社。
中华人民共和国教育部制订：2001，《九年义务教育全日制初级中学英语教学大纲》
(试用修订版)，北京：人民教育出版社。
中华人民共和国教育部制订：2001，《全日制义务教育、普通高级中学英语课程标准(实验稿)》北京：北京师范大学出版社。
(中国)课程教材研究所，英语课程教材研究中心，(美国)汤姆森学习出版集团合编：2002(新目标)英语，Go for it! 七年级上册，人民教育出版社。
张正东编著，1997，《外语教育学》，重庆：重庆出版社。
张国扬、朱亚夫著，1999，《外语教育语言学》，桂林：广西教育出版社。
朱慕菊主编，2002，《走进新课程》，北京：北京师范大学出版社。
周斌，2003，做个自觉的外语学习者，《中小学外语教学》，第6期。
章兼中、俞红珍，1997，中小学英语学习策略的研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》，第5期：2-9。
张文鹏，1999，中学生英语学习策略运用研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》，第4期：8-11。
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Prentice Hall Regents.
Chamot, A. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J.Rubin (eds). Learning Strategies in Language Learning. Prentice Hall.
Chamot, A. U. et al. (1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. NY: Longman.
Chen, S. Q. (1990). A Study of Communication Strategies in Interlanguage. Production by Chinese EFL Learners. Language Learning 40(20: 155-187).
Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in Learning aned Using a Second Language. London Longman.
Ellies, R. (1999) Understanding Second Language Acquisition, Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huang, Xiao-hua.(1984). An investigation of Learning Strategies in Oral Communication That Chinese EFL Learners in China Employ. Unpublished M.A. thesis in Chinese University in Hong Kong.
Huang X.H. & M. V. Naerssen. (1985). Learning Strategies for Oral Communication. Applied Linguistics 6: 287-307.
Krashen, S. (1987). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Littlewood, W. (2000) Communicative Language Teaching. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Michael J. Wallace, (2000). Action Research for Language Teachers. Beijing: PEP & Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Naiman, N. et al. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Research in Education Series No.7.Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Naiman, N. et al. (1996). The Good Language Learner. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Numan, D. (2000) Designing Tasks for Communicative Classroom, Beijing: PEP.
O'Malley, J. M. et al, (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning 35: 21-46.
O'Malley, J. & A. U. Chamot, (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
O'Malley, J. M. et al. (1985b). Learning strategy applications with students if English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly 19: 285-96.
Oxford, R. (1989). Use of Language Learning Strategies: A Syn-thesis of Studies with Implications for Teacher Training. System 17(2): 235-247.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. et al. (1990). Strategy training for language learners: six situational case studies and training model. Foreign Language Annals 22(3): 197-216
Oxford, R. (ed). (1996). Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-cultural perspectives (Technical Report 13). Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu HI.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9: 41-51.
Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 2(2): 117-31.
Rubin, J. (1987). Learning strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden. & J. Rubin (eds). Learning Strategies in Language Learning. Prentice Hall.
Rubin, J. & I. Thompson. (1994). How to Be a More Successful Language Learner. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Pulishers, Inc.
Stern, H, (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modem
Language Review 31: 304-18.
Weinstein, C. & R. Mayer. (1986). The Teaching of Learning Strategies. In Wittrock, M. (ed)Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. New York: Prentice Hall.
Weinstein, C. & R. Mayer. (1986). The teaching of learning Strategies. In M. Wittrock (ed). Handbook of Research on Teahcing.(3rd ed). New York: Macmillan.
Wendern, A. & J. Rubin (eds) (1987). Learning Strategies in Language Learning. Pretice Hall.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy: Planning and Implementing Learner Training for Language Learners. Prentice Hall Europe.
Wong—Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive ang Social strategies in sedond language acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertion, Standford University.
程晓堂、郑敏，2002，《英语学习策略》。北京：外语教育与研究出版社。
傅道春编著，2001，《新课程中教师行为的变化》，北京：首都师范大学出版社。
教育部基础教育司组织编写，2002，《英语课程标准解读》，北京：北京师范大学出版社。
郭平建、郝建风，2002，中学生使用英语学习策略的调查与分析，《中小学英语教学与研究》第2期。
胡春洞主编：1998，《英语教学法》，北京：高等教育出版社。
贾冠杰，2003，《外语教育心理学》。南宁：广西教育出版社。
贾连萍，2003，对英语词汇教学的几点思考，《中小学生外语教学》第9期。
胡竹菊，2002，中学生英语学习策略与英语习得的关系，《中小学英语教学与研究》第10期。
刘电芝主编，1999，《学习策略研究》，北京：人民教育出版社。
陆琦，2003，常用词汇学习策略影响词汇记忆的实验研究，《中小学生外语教学》第5期。
刘润清，1990，决定语言学习的几个因素，《外语教学与研究》第2期。
刘润清(与吴一安、P.Jeffery合著)，1993，中国英语本科素质调查报告，《外语教学与研究》第1期。
刘润清，1999，《外语教学中的科研方法》，外语教学与研究出版社。
罗宪达、尹世寅、周容：2003，《英语教学实施指南》，华中师范大学出版社。
马若文，2003，注重学习策略培训优化英语课堂教学，《中小学英语教学与研究》第5期。
潘海燕，2003，英语阅读策略与阅读理解相关研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》第11期。
束定芳、庄智象，1996，《现代外语教学：理论、实践与方法》，上海外语教育出版社。
苏远胜、张耀冰，2003，西方学习策略研究综述，《国外外语教育》，第3期。
谭晓瑛、魏立明，2002，大学英语学习策略培训研究，《外语界》第6期。
王虹，2002，高中起始阶段学生认知策略的研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》第5期。
王文宇，1998，观念、策略与英语词汇记忆，《外语教学与研究》第1期。
文秋芳，1995，英语成功者与不成功者在学习方法上的差异，《外语教学与研究》第3期。
文秋芳，1996a，传统和非传统学习方法与英语成绩的关系，《现代外语》第1期。
文秋芳，1996b，大学生英语学习策略变化的趋势及其特点，《外语与外语教学》第4期。
文秋芳、王海啸，1996b，学习者因素与大学英语四级考试成绩的关系，《外语教学与研究》第4期。
文秋芳，1996a，《英语学习策略论》，上海外语教育出版社。
吴本虎，1997，如何研究中小学外语学习策略：方法与手段，《中小学英语教学与研究》第5期。
吴增生，1994，值得研究的“学习者策略”的研究，《现代外语》第3期。
薛绍兰，2003，学习策略：应对初中英语教学，《重庆教育》第11期。
扬福生，2003，国内外语学习策略研究现状分析综述，《中小学英语教学与研究》第6期。
伊翠端，2003，小学生英语学习策略的现状分析，《中小学英语教学与研究》第4期。
朱纯，1994，《外语教学心理学》，上海外语教育出版社。
中华人民共和国教育部制订：2001，《九年义务教育全日制初级中学英语教学大纲》
(试用修订版)，北京：人民教育出版社。
中华人民共和国教育部制订：2001，《全日制义务教育、普通高级中学英语课程标准(实验稿)》北京：北京师范大学出版社。
(中国)课程教材研究所，英语课程教材研究中心，(美国)汤姆森学习出版集团合编：2002(新目标)英语，Go for it! 七年级上册，人民教育出版社。
张正东编著，1997，《外语教育学》，重庆：重庆出版社。
张国扬、朱亚夫著，1999，《外语教育语言学》，桂林：广西教育出版社。
朱慕菊主编，2002，《走进新课程》，北京：北京师范大学出版社。
周斌，2003，做个自觉的外语学习者，《中小学外语教学》，第6期。
章兼中、俞红珍，1997，中小学英语学习策略的研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》，第5期：2-9。
张文鹏，1999，中学生英语学习策略运用研究，《中小学英语教学与研究》，第4期：8-11。