用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于不确定多属性决策的质量功能配置研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
质量功能配置是系统化、结构化的产品开发和质量管理方法。该方法采用序贯决策的模式将顾客需求贯穿于应用的全过程,决策信息集中,决策过程透明,规范其中的重要环节,并可自成文档。在当前制造业市场竞争不断加剧、顾客需求的多样化和个性化已成潮流、产品与服务开发管理日益复杂的情况下,研究质量功能配置具有较好的现实意义和应用前景。
     质量功能配置的过程,是信息流动与处理的过程。从原始顾客需求开始,各方面的相关信息经收集、加工、处理后,形成所需的设计知识,支持后续阶段的决策活动。由于决策对知识使用的特殊需要、知识本身的不清晰性和复杂性、信息呈现形式的多样性和不确定性,质量功能配置在实施过程中存在—定困难。不确定多属性决策旨在解决不确定环境下有限备选方案的多准则决策问题,与质量功能配置的许多问题有内在的紧密联系。为此本文结合不确定多属性决策理论与方法对其中的若干关键问题进行研究,目的是使这种行之有效的产品开发和质量管理方法能够更好地适应不确定的信息环境,丰富和完善质量功能配置的方法体系,为我国制造业企业的产品或产品服务开发提供技术支持,具体的研究成果主要体现在以下方面:
     1)针对市场调查时顾客评价信息经常存在缺失的实际情况,提出基于顾客群体不完全语义偏好信息的顾客需求基本重要度确定方法。首先充分利用个体的已知偏好信息对缺失的偏好信息进行合理推断,然后通过信息集结获得群体偏好信息,进而揭示顾客视角下的需求的相对重要性。该方法不但解决了实际调查中普遍存在的顾客部分评价信息缺失的问题,而且能够降低评价者的负担,有助于评价者集中于自己所关注的“焦点项目”,从而提高了分析结果的准确度。
     2)针对产品需求信息的多样性和不确定性,提出一种利用产品规划质量屋中的竞争性评价信息及卡诺模型对顾客需求基本重要度进行调整的方法。为了深入挖掘竞争性评价信息,提出顾客需求的竞争性重要度和改进优先度的概念,分别体现顾客视角下市场竞争的需要和企业从自身实际出发改进产品性能的意愿,推导出二者的计算公式;同时结合卡诺模型的思想,由顾客满意度双因素分析法识别顾客需求的卡诺分类并估计卡诺因子;最后通过上述分析结果对顾客需求基本重要度的修正,对于增强产品市场竞争力、提升顾客满意度潜在贡献较大的需求项目赋予更高的重要度。
     3)根据质量屋实现顾客需求向技术特征转换时信息来源的特点,提出先分别依据质量屋中的主、客观信息赋权计算再加权集成的技术特征重要度评估方法。进行主观赋权时,允许各专家自由选择语言术语集对顾客需求与技术特征的关系进行评估,并采用语言加权算子和语言混合集成算子进行信息集结,体现数据本身及所在的位置的重要性;进行客观赋权时,允许技术特征值以区间数形式表示,将含有区间数的技术竞争性数据转化为目标相离度矩阵后,使用熵值法赋权。过程中既有专家的经验判断,又有对现实数据的逻辑推理,实现了主观和客观的统一。
     4)根据产品概念设计方案决策的目标和准则体系的特点,提出基于层次分析法与排序组织法的设计方案决策方法。在建立定性与定量相结合的决策准则体系的基础上,首先使用层次分析法确定属性权重,然后使用排序组织法计算各属性上的偏好指标,进而计算各方案的净流,获得方案的完全序。该方法以设计者的目标与价值观为导向,并兼顾属性信息的不确定性,可为产品设计方案的选择提供一条有效途径。
     5)利用服务运作和质量功能配置的核心思想相吻合的特点,提出基于质量功能配置的产品服务开发方法体系。在从服务的一般概念和内涵出发对产品服务进行剖析的基础上,使用质量功能配置的方法工具将顾客对产品服务的需求逐步展开为阶段具体目标,设计出适用于产品服务开发的质量功能配置过程,并给出过程中确定服务属性重要度的群决策方法步骤,为产品服务的开发策划创设了一个新的思路。
     本文在研究中,通过一系列产品和产品服务开发的具体实例验证了各章节所提方法的适用性和有效性。
Quality function deployment is a systematic, structured method for product development and quality management to realize customer requirements throughout the whole process of its application in the form of sequential decision. The decision information is centralized and the decision process is transparent. With the normalization of its important processes, the method can be self-documenting. Currently, product market competition continues to accelerate, the diversification and personalization of customer requirements has already become the trend, product/service development is becoming increasingly complex, thus quality function deployment has a good practical significance and application prospects.
     The process of quality function deployment is the processing flows of information. From the original customer requirements, all the relevant information is collected and handed to refine the required design knowledge to support the subsequent decisions. The vagueness and complexity of knowledge, the diversity and uncertainty of the information form, and the special needs of knowledge for decision making hinder the implementation of quality function deployment. The Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making methods are technical decision aids for evaluating alternatives characterized by multiple attributes under uncertain environment, which has intrinsically close contact with many problems of quality function deployment. This research combines the Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making methods to explore some key issues in quality function deployment. We hope our research can help this effective method better adapt to the uncertainty enviroment, enrich and improve the quality function deployment methodology, and provide technical support for the development of product/service in manufacturing firms. The major achievements and innovations of this dissertation are summarized as follows:
     1) To deal with the the vagueness and incompleteness of customer preference in customer requirements analysis, a method on the basis of incomplete linguistic judgment matrices to analysis the importance of customer requirements is proposed. Each individual preference is represented by an additive linguistic judgment matrice and extended to a complete form when certain elements are missing. Then all these extended matrices are aggregated into a collective one in order to obtain the importance of customers'requirements. The method can not only solve the problem of information missing in customer surveys, but also reduce the burden of the evaluators, and help them to focus on their own concerns, thus improves the result accuracy.
     2) To deal with the diversity and uncertainty of information in customer requirements analysis, a method integrating market competitive information in product planning house of quality and Kano model to adjust the fundamental importance ratings of customer requirements is given. In order to min knowledge from the competitive information, the concepts of the competitive priority ratings and the improvement ratios of customer requirements are proposed, which reflect the need for competition from the customers perspective and the firm's willingness to improve its product performance, respectively. Their solving formulas are also derived. Two-factor analysis is utilized to identify the different categories of customer requirements and estimate the Kano regulators. By using the competitive priority ratings, the improvement ratios and the Kano regulators to correct the fundamental importance ratings, the final importance ratings of customer requirements are determined. It makes designers pay more attention to customer requirements that have larger potential contribution in enhancing the competitiveness and improving customer satisfaction.
     3) According to the characteristics of information source types in translation from customer requirements to technical characteristics by using house of quality, a synthetic method utilizing the subjective and objective information in house of quality to determine the priority ratings of technical characteristics is proposed. In subjective weighting, decision-makers can choose linguistic terms to evaluate the relationship between customer requirements and technical characteristics according to their own preference. The weighted averaging operator and the linguistic hybrid operator are used to aggregate the individual judgments into a collective value for each technical characteristic, reflecting the importance degrees of both the given argument and its ordered position. In objective weighting, uncertain values of technical characteristics are given in the form of internal numbers. Based on technical competitive information, a goal-deviation matrix is conducted in order to obtain objective importance ratings by using entropy methods. The final result is weighted value of the subjective and objective calculation, which coordinates and unifies the wisdom of experts and the data-based reasoning.
     4) According to the characteristics of the goal and criteria in decision making for product design alternatives, an evaluation model combining analytic hierarchy process with preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations is proposed. Based on the combination of quantitative and qualitative decision criteria system, analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the weight for criteria. Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations is used to calculate the net flow to obtain the ranking of the design alternatives. This approach takes into account the uncertainty of the attribute information and orients to the designer's goals and values, thus has certain implication in product design.
     5) Due to the fact that quality function deployment and service operations coincide in their core ideas, a product service deployment methodology based on quality function deployment is proposed. On the basis of analyzing product service from the perspective of the general concept and content of service, quality function deployment tools are utilized to transform customer requirements for product service into the specific objectives of each stage. The process of quality function deployment for product service is designed and a group decision method to determine the importance ratings of service attributes is given, that can creat a new way for product service deployment.
     Finally, a series of real-world product/service development cases prove the feasibility and effectiveness of the abovementioned methods in this paper.
引文
[1]谢友柏.现代设计理论中的若干基本概念[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(11):7-16.
    [2]Krishnan V, Ulrich K T. Product development decisions:a review of the literature[J]. Management Science,2001,47(1):1-21.
    [3]Ulrich K T, Eppinger S D.产品设计与开发[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
    [4]杨叔子,吴波,李斌.再论先进制造技术及其发展趋势[J].机械工程学报,2006,42(1):1-5.
    [5]Hauser J R, Clausing D P. The house of quality[J]. Harvard Business Review,1988, 66(3):63-73.
    [6]Suh N P. Complexity:Theory and Applications [M]. New York:Oxford University Press,2005.
    [7]文放怀.田口方法[M].广州:广东经济出版社,2006.
    [8]杨清亮.发明是这样诞生的-TRIZ理论全接触[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2006.
    [9]Chan L K, Wu M L. Quality function deployment:A literature review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2002,143(3):463-497.
    [10]Akao Y, Mazur G H. The leading edge in QFD:Past, present, and future[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,2003,20(1):20-35.
    [11]Carnevalli J A, Miguel P C. Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD——types of research, difficulties and benefits [J]. International Journal of Productions Economics,2008,114(2):737-754.
    [12]Xu J, Xu X, Xie S Q. A comprehensive review on recent developments in quality function deployment[J]. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. 2010,6(4):457-494.
    [13]车阿大,杨明顺.质量功能配置理论及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2008.
    [14]熊伟.质量功能展开—从理论到实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
    [15]李延来,唐加福,姚建明,等.质量屋构建的研究进展[J].机械工程学报,2009,45(3):57-70.
    [16]Raharjo H, Brombacher A C, Xie M. Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase:A systematic approach to exploit quality function deployment potentials [J]. Computer & Industrial Engineering,2008,55(1):253-278.
    [17]刘玉敏,张晓丽,徐济超.顾客满意度测评的质量功能展开方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(9):20-27.
    [18]Li Yanlai, Tang Jiafu, Luo Xinggang, Yao Jianming, Xu Jie. A quantitative methodology for acquiring engineering characteristics in PPHOQ[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(1):187-193.
    [19]岳超源.决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
    [20]徐玖平,吴巍.多属性决策的理论与方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
    [21]岳超源.决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
    [22]Herrera E, Alonso S, Chiclana F. Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects[J]. Fuzzy Optim Decision Making,2009,8(4): 337-364.
    [23]Bossert J L. Quality function deployment:a practitioner's approach[M]. Milwaukee, WI:ASQG Quality Press; 1991.
    [24]李延来.基于粗糙集的产品规划质量屋构建研究[D].西南交通大学,成都,2006.
    [25]Guinta L R, Praizler N C. The QFD book:the team approach to solving problems and satisfying customers through quality function deployment[M]. New York:Amacom, 1993.
    [26]Yan W, Chen C H, Khoo L P. A radical basis function neural network multicultural factors evaluation engine for product concept development [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2001,8(5):219-232.
    [27]Chen C H, Khoo L P, Yan W. A strategy for acquiring customer requirement patterns using laddering technique and ART2 neural network[J]. Advance Engineering Information,2002,16(3):229-240.
    [28]Jiao J X, Zhang Y Y. Product portfolio identification based on association rule mining[J]. Computer-Aided Design,2005,37(3):149-172.
    [29]邓超,马晓彬,吴军,等.基于粗糙集理论的质量屋顾客需求分析技术[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(6):1191-1195.
    [30]李延来,唐加福,蒲云,等.质量功能展开中顾客需求的排序算法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(6):1196-1203.
    [31]李光明,殷国富,要小鹏.基于优势关系的质量功能展开中的顾客基本需求[J].计算机集成制造系统,2010,16(5):1061-1066.
    [32]刘鸿恩,张列平.改进的质量功能展开(Ⅱ)——系统方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2000,20(2):58-62.
    [33]Park T, Kim K J. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality[J]. Journal of Operations Management,1998,16 (5):569-581.
    [34]Armacost R L, Componation P J, Mullens M A, Swart W W. An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD:An industrialized housing application [J]. HE Transactions,1994,26 (4):72-79.
    [35]刘鸿恩.改进的质量功能展开[J].系统工程理论方法与应用,1995,14(4):49-53.
    [36]胡启国,张鹏.基于群决策分析法和模糊聚类理论的改进质量功能展开研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(7):1374-1380.
    [37]Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control,1965,8(3):338-353.
    [38]Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variables and its application to approximate reasoning[J]. Information Sciences,1975,8(3):199-249
    [39]杨明顺,林志航.QFD中顾客需求重要度确定的一种方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):65-71.
    [40]Bouchereau V, Rowlands H. An Intelligent Systems Approach to QFD[M].10th Symposium on QFD,1998.
    [41]Esmaeil Mehdizadeh. Ranking of customer requirements using the fuzzy centroid-based method[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2010,27(2):201-216.
    [42]Zhang Z F, Chu X N. Fuzzy group decision-making for multi-format and multi-granularity linguistic judgments in quality function deployment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,36(5):9150-9158.
    [43]王晓暾,熊伟.质量功能展开中顾客需求重要度确定的粗糙层次分析法.计算机集成制造系统[J].2010,16(4):763-771.
    [44]李朝玲,高齐圣.质量功能展开中基于二元语义的顾客需求重要度的确定[J].计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(6):1202-1206.
    [45]许永平,吴红,王文广,等.质量功能部署中基于多种形式偏好信息的群决策方法[J].河北工业大学学报,2010,39(5):78-83.
    [46]Tan K C, Sheng X X. Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment[J]. Total Qual Manage,2000,11(8):1141-1151.
    [47]Khoo L P, Ho N C. Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system[J]. International Journal of Production Research,1996,34(2):299-311.
    [48]Chan L K, Wu M L. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example[J]. Omega,2005,33(1):119-139.
    [49]Lai X, Xie M, Tan K C, Yang B. Ranking of customer requirements in a competitive environment[J]. Computer & industrial engineering,2008,54(2):202-214.
    [50]Lee M C, Newcomb J F. Applying the Kano methodology to meet customer requirements:NASA's microgravity science program[J]. Quality Management Journal, 1997,4(1):95-106.
    [51]Lee Y C, Sheu L C, Tsou Y G. Quality function deployment implementation based on fuzzy Kano model:an application in PLM system[J]. Computer & industrial engineering,2008,55(1):48-63.
    [52]Chen L H, Ko W C. A fuzzy nonlinear model for quality function deployment considering Kano's concept[J], Mathemathical & Computer Modeling,2008,48(3-4): 581-593.
    [53]李延来,雒兴刚,韩毅,等.基于平衡计分卡的产品规划中顾客需求综合优先度的确定[J].中国机械工程,2010,21(12):1430-1440.
    [54]Chen Y Z, Fung R Y K, Tang J F. Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174:1553-1566.
    [55]Kim Y J, Chao B R. Development of priority-based robust design. Quality Engineering[J],2002,14(3):355-363.
    [56]Liu S T. Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2005,43(3):497-513.
    [57]Kim D H, Kim K J. Robustness indices and robust prioritization in QFD[J]. Expert Systems with Application,2009,36(2):2651-2658
    [58]Kim H K, Lee M S, Kim K J. A systematic method for generating engineering characteristic candidates in quality function deployment[J]. International Journal of Industrial Engineering,2007,14(2):179-187.
    [59]Bossert J L. Quality function deployment:a practitioner's approach[M]. Milwaukee, WI:ASQC Quality Press,1991.
    [60]王美清,唐晓青.产品设计中的用户需求与产品质量特征映射方法研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(5):136-140.
    [61]雷鸣,朱祖平,姚立纲.质量功能展开中顾客需求自动映射[J].计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(3):592-597.
    [62]李延来,唐加福,姚建明,等.基于粗糙集理论的质量屋中工程特性确定方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2008,14(2):386-392.
    [63]Kim Y P, Yoon C H, Yun D K. Determining customer-oriented technical importance ratings:an evaluative study[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,2005,22(4):393-409.
    [64]Liu C H, Wu Hsin-Hung. A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment[J]. Qual Quant,2008,42(4):527-540.
    [65]林志航,车阿大.质量功能配置研究现状及进展—兼谈对我国QFD研究与应用的看法[J].机械科学与技术,1998,17(1):119-121+144.
    [66]Ibo van de Poel. Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development[J]. Research in Engineering Design,2007,18(1):21-36.
    [67]Ramasamy N Rajam and Selladurai V. Fuzzy logic approach to prioritise engineering characteristics in quality function deploymen[J]. International Journal of Quality & Management,2004,21(9):1012-1023.
    [68]Kwong C K, Chen Y, Bai H, Chan D S. A methodology of determining aggregated importance of engineering characteristics in QFD[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2007,53(4):666-679.
    [69]Ertay T, Kahraman C, Ruand D. Quality function deployment implementation based on analytic network process with linguistic data:An application in automotive industry[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems,2005,16(1):171-190.
    [70]李延来,唐加福,姚建明等.质量功能展开中自相关关系确定的的粗糙集方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(2):52-60.
    [71]Kim K J, Moskowitiz H, Dhingra A, et al. Fuzzy multi-criteria models for quality function deployment [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,121(3): 504-518.
    [72]Chen Y Z, Chen L. A non-linear possibilistic regression approach to model functional relationships in product planning[J]. The International Journal of Manufacturing Technology,2006,28(11-12):1175-1181.
    [73]Chan L K, Wu M L. Quality function deployment:a comprehensive review of its concepts and methods[J]. Quality Engineering,2002,15(1):23-35.
    [74]Wang S Y. Constructing the complete linguistic-based and gap-oriented quality function deployment [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(2):908-912.
    [75]Wasserman G S. On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process[J]. HE Transactions,1993,25(3):59-65.
    [76]Moskowitz H, Kim K L. QFD Optimizer:a novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product design[J]. Computer and Industrial Engineering,1997,32(3):641-655.
    [77]Chan K Y, Kwong C K, Wong T C. Modelling customer satisfaction for product development using genetic programming[J]. Journal of Engineering Design,2011, 22(1):55-68.
    [78]Fung R Y K, Tang J F, et al. Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2002,40(3):585-599.
    [79]Vanegas L V, Labib A W. A fuzzy quality function deployment model for deriving optimum targets[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2001,39(1):99-120.
    [80]Chen L H, Weng M C. A fuzzy model exploiting quality function deployment[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling,2003,38(3):559-570.
    [81]杨明顺,林志航.具有离散和连续技术特征的质量屋优化模型[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(3):111-114.
    [82]张立彬,史伟民,鲍官军,等.基于公理设计的通用设计过程模型[J].机械工程学报,2010,46(23):166-173.
    [83]Paul G, Beitz W. Engineering Design[M]. London:The Design Council,1984.
    [84]Vanegas L V, Labib A W. Fuzzy approaches to evaluation in engineer design[J]. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design,2005,125,127(1):24-33.
    [85]Gulcin B, Orhan F. A fuzzy logic based decision making approach for new product development [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2004,90(1):27-45.
    [86]CHiou H K, Tzeng G H, Cheng D C. Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach[J]. Omega,2005,33:223-234.
    [87]王洪,唐晓青.设计质量评估体系模型及其构建方法研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(1):50-53+77.
    [88]崔勇,孙枫.基于模糊群决策的质量屋方案选择模型[J].中国机械工程,2007,18(7):807-811.
    [89]穆瑞.基于QFD方法的机电产品方案评价方法研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学,哈尔滨,2009.
    [90]Geng X L, Chu X N, Zhang Z F. A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(9):6629-6638.
    [91]徐皓,樊治平,刘洋,等.一种考虑指标期望的产品设计方案选择方法[J].工业工程与管理,2010,15(1):31-36.
    [92]钟诗胜,王体春,丁刚,等.基于基元模型的复杂产品方案设计知识可拓重用方法[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2010,40(1):159-164.
    [93]Chen H H, Lee A H I, Tong Y. Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty [J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2007, 33(2):337-346.
    [94]薛立华,黄洪钟,章旭,等.概念设计方案评价和决策线性物理规划模型研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2005,45(4):562-565.
    [95]程贤福,肖人彬,刘平安,等.基于信息公理的混合型多属性产品方案评价[J].计算机集成制造系统,2010,16(9):1816-1822.
    [96]Sun J, Kalenchuk D K, Xue D, et al. Design candidate identification using netural network-based fuzzy reasoning[J]. Robotics and Computer Intergrated Manufacyuring, 2000,16(5):383-396.
    [97]Zeeny M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York:McGraw-Hill,1982.
    [98]Hwang C L, Lin M J. Group decision making under multiple criteria:methods and applications [M]. Berlin:Springer,1987.
    [99]陈珽.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
    [100]Xu Z S. On method for uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems with uncertain multiplicative preference information on alternatives [J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2005,4(2):131-139.
    [101]丁勇,梁昌勇,朱俊红,等.群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法[J].中国管理科学.2010,18(5):165-170.
    [102]Chu A T W, Kalaba R E, Spingarn K. A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets[J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Application,1979,27:531-538.
    [103]William H. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,186(1):211-228.
    [104]郭亚军.综合评价理论、方法及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
    [105]章玲,周德群,李存芳.R-WGA算子的构建及其在群决策分析中的应用[J].控制与决策,2007,22(12):1352-1356.
    [106]熊文涛,齐欢,雍龙泉.一种新的基于离差最大化的客观权重确定模型[J].系统工程,2010,28(5):95-98.
    [107]Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making:methods and applications [M]. Berlin:Springer,1981.
    [108]徐泽水,达庆利.多属性决策的组合赋权方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(2):84-87.
    [109]Jian M, Fan Z P, Huang L H. A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1999, 112(2):397-404.
    [110]崔杰,党耀国,刘思峰.基于灰色关联度求解指标权重的改进方法[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(5):141-145.
    [111]曹秀英,梁静国.基于粗集理论的属性权重确定方法[J].中国管理科学,2002, 10(5):98-100.
    [112]Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging operators in multicriteria decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,1988,18:183-190.
    [113]Xu Z S, Da Q L. Hybrid aggregation operator and its application to multiple attributes decision making problems[J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition),2003, 19(2):174-177.
    [114]Aczel J, Alsina C. Synthesizing judgements:A functional equation approach[J]. Mathemtical Modeling,1987,9:311-320.
    [115]Yager R R. Induced aggregation operators[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2003,137: 59-69.
    [116]Yager R R. Induced ordered weighted averaging operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B,1999,29:141-150.
    [117]Yager R R. Generalized OWA aggregation operators[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2004,3:93-107.
    [118]Merigo J M, Gil-Lafuente A M. The induced generalized OWA operator [J]. Information Science,2009,179(6):729-941.
    [119]Xu Z S, Da Q L. The uncertain OWA operator [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2002,17:569-575.
    [120]Xu Z S, Da Q L. An uncertain ordered weighted geometric operator and its application [J]. Information:an International Journal,2004,7(2):175-182.
    [121]Yager R R. OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, 2004,34:1952-1963.
    [122]Yager R R, Xu Z S. The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157(10):1393-1402.
    [123]吴坚.基于OWA算子理论的混合型多属性群决策研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2008.
    [124]卫贵武.几类模糊多属性决策方法研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2009.
    [125]徐泽水.不确定多属性决策方法及应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
    [126]Wu Z B, Chen Y H. The maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2007,158(14): 1608-1617.
    [127]许叶军,达庆利,赵辰希.部分权重信息下的一种交互式不确定语言多属性决策法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2009,31(3):597-601.
    [128]郭亚军,张发明,易平涛.标度选择对综合评价结果的影响及合理性分析[J].系统工程与电子技术,2008,30(7):1277-1280.
    [129]谭春桥,马本江.基于语言Choquet积分算子的多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2010,32(11):2352-2355.
    [130]Herrera F, Nartinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2000,8(6):746-752.
    [131]王欣荣,樊治平.基于二元语义信息处理的一种语言群决策方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):1-5.
    [132]廖貅武,李垣,董广茂.一种处理语言评价信息的多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,9:90-98.
    [133]Parreiras R O, Ekel P Ya, Martini J S C, Palhares R M, A flexible consensus scheme for multi criteria group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. Information Sciences,180(7):1075-1089.
    [134]姜艳萍,穆丽.基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群体一致性分析方法[J].运筹与管理,2009,18(5):53-58.
    [135]Zeng Ling. Expected value method for fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology,2006,11(1):102-106.
    [136]Kuo M S, Tzen G H, Huang W C. Group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2007,45:324-339.
    [137]Chen C T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,114(1):1-9.
    [138]Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Passi G. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,1997,27:126-132.
    [139]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Aggregation operator for linguistic weighted information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,1997,27: 646-656.
    [140]Bellman R, Zadel L A. Decision making in a fuzzy environment [J]. Management Science,1970,17B(4):141-164.
    [141]Baas S M, Kwakernaak H. Rating and ranking of multiple aspect alternative using fuzzy sets[J].Automatica,1977,13(1):47-58.
    [142]Chen S J, Hwang C L. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,1992.
    [143]Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Intergrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations[J]. Fuzzy sets and Systems,2001,122(2):277-291.
    [144]Dubois D, Prade H. Ranking of fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory[J]. Information Science,1983,30(2):183-224.
    [145]兰继斌,徐扬,刘家忠.模糊多属性决策的折衷方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,1:40-43.
    [146]Jocelyn San P, Frada B, Alan S. A cased-based fuzzy multicriteria decision support model for tropical cyclone forecasting [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005,160(2):308-324.
    [147]王绪柱,单静.模糊量排序综述[J].模糊系统和数学,2001,16(4):28-34.
    [148]Chen L H, Lu H W. The preference order of fuzzy number [J]. Computer Mathematics Application,2002,44:1455-1465.
    [149]朱方霞,陈华友.基于可能度的决策矩阵排序的一种新方法[J].系统工程,2005,7:29-32.
    [150]Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis:a practical approach[J]. Journal of Operational Research Society,1989,40(7):681-686.
    [151]张吉军.区间数多指标决策问题的灰关联分析法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(6):1030-1033.
    [152]Bryson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1996,96(3): 379-386.
    [153]叶跃祥,糜仲春,王宏宇,等.一种基于集对分析的区间数多属性决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(9):1344-1347.
    [154]刘秀梅,赵克勤.基于SPA的D-U空间的区间数多属性决策模型及应用[J].模糊系统与数学,2009,23(2):167-174.
    [155]李为湘,张广明,李帮义.基于区间数的PROMETHEEⅡ方法中权重确定[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(3):101-105.
    [156]万树平.基于博弈理论的区间型多属性决策方法[J].系统工程,2010,28(1):95-98.
    [157]Pawlak Z, Slowinski R. Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1994,72(3):443-459.
    [158]Polkowski L. Pough Sets:Mathematical Foundations[M]. Heidelberg:Physica-Verlag, 2002.
    [159]Slowinski R, Stefanowski J, Greco S, et al. Rough sets processing of inconsistent information in decision analysis[J]. Control and Cybernetics,2000,29(1):379-404.
    [160]谭春桥,张强.模糊多属性决策的直觉模糊集方法[J].模糊系统与数学,2006,20(5):71-76.
    [161]Xu Z S. On correlation measures of intuitionstic fuzzy sets[J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,2006,4224:16-28.
    [162]Lin L, Yuan X H, Xia Z Q. Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making methods based on intuitionstic fuzzy sets[J]. Journal of Computer System Sciences,2007,73:84-88.
    [163]刘思锋,郭天榜,党耀国.灰色系统理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
    [164]卫贵武,魏宇.对方案有偏好的区间数多属性灰色关联决策模型[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(1):158-162.
    [165]Olson D L, Wu D S. Simulation of fuzzy multiattribute models for grey relationships [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,175(11):111-120.
    [166]Yang J B, Xu D L. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern (Part A).2002,32: 289-304.
    [167]Kirkwood C W, Sarin R K. Ranking with partial information:A method and application[J]. Operations Research,1985,33:38-48.
    [168]Park K S, Kim S H. Tools for interactive multiattribute decision making with incompletely identified information [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997,98:111-123.
    [169]Kim S H, Han C H. An interactive procedure for multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete information [J]. Computers & Operations Research,1999,26:755-772.
    [170]Pillip J R. The role of Taguchi Method and Decisign of Experiments in QFD[J]. Quality Progress,1988,21(6):41-47.
    [171]郭基联,王卓健,朱绍强.QFD与FMEA相结合的需求重要度确定方法[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2009,10(6):10-14.
    [172]顾新建,李晓,祁国宁,等.产品服务系统理论和关键技术探讨[J],浙江大学学报(工学版),2009,43(12):2237-2243.
    [173]吴今培,李学伟.系统科学发展概论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2010.
    [174]Daniel C R, Hesamedin O A G. Comparing LCA results out of competing products: developing reference ranges from a product family approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2010,18(4):355-364.
    [175]Ahmadi R H, Roemer T A, Wang R H. Structuring product development process [J]. European Journal of Operation Research,2001,130(3):593-558.
    [176]Souder W E. Management Decision Methods for Managers of Engineering and Research[M]. New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1980.
    [177]谢友柏.现代设计理论和方法的研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(4):1-9.
    [178]Akao Y. Quality Function Deployment:Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts:Productivity Press,1990.
    [179]Sullivan L P. Quality Function Deployment[J]. Quality Press,1986,19(6):39-50.
    [180]Cohen L. Quality Function Deployment:How to make QFD work for you[M]. London: Prentice Hall,1995.
    [181]赵武,张颖,石贵龙.质量机能展开研究综述[J].世界标准化与质量管理,2007(4):56-61.
    [182]王计斌.并行工程环境下产品开发过程研究[D].北京:清华大学,1999.
    [183]林志航.产品设计与制造质量工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2005.
    [184]Eldin N. A promising Planning Tool:Quality Function Deployment[J]. Cost Engineering,2002,44(3):28-37.
    [185]Sanford J. How useful is QFD? [J]. Quality Progress,2005,38(1):51-59.
    [186]邓家褆,韩晓建,曾硝.产品概念设计一理论方法与技术[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
    [187]Pahl G, Wolfgang Beitz. Engineering Design:A Systematic Approach, second edition[M]. London:Springer-Verlag,1996.
    [188]徐泽水.基于语言信息的决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    [189]李柏姝,雒兴刚,唐家福.基于价值分析的产品属性权重的确定方法[J].中国机械工程,2011,22(3):331-334.
    [190]Xu J, Xu X, Xie S Q. A comprehensive review on recent developments in quality function deployment[J]. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. 2010,6(4):457-494.
    [191]Tan K C, Shen X X. Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment[J]. Total Qual Manage,2000,11(8):1141-1151.
    [192]谢友柏.现代设计理论和方法的研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(4):1-8.
    [193]Abbie G, Hauser J R. The voice of the customer[J]. Marketing Science,1993,12(1): 1-27.
    [194]Eric Von Hippel. The Sources of Innovation[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1988.
    [195]邓晓刚,杨联星,郭刚.面向新产品开发市场定位的一种聚类算法[J].计算机应用研究,2008,25(12):3596-3598.
    [196]姚海,鲍劲松,金烨.产品功能需求的分类及分析方法[J].机械设计与研究,2009,25(3):7-13.
    [197]Lin C T. A fuzzy logic based approach for implementing quality function deployment[J]. Smart Engineering System Design,2003(5):55-65.
    [198]Armacost R L, Componation P J, Mullens M A, Swart W W. An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD:An industrialized housing application [J]. HE Transactions,1994,26(4):72-79.
    [199]车阿大,林志航,陈康宁.质量功能配置中基于ANN的用户需求重要度评估方法[J].西安交通大学学报,1999,33(5):75-78.
    [200]陈以增,唐加福等.基于质量屋的用户需求权重确定方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003(8):36-41.
    [201]Fariborz Y. Partovi, An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision[J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management.2001,12(5):476-499.
    [202]Kahraman C, Ertay T, TBAAyAAkAAzkan GAAlAAin. A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,171(1):390-411.
    [203]吴永明,李牧之,王俊军.绿色QFD中顾客与环境需求权重的模糊规划[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2009,21(10):1427-1431.
    [204]Chan L K, Kao H P, Ng A, Wu M L. Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods[J]. International Journal of Production Research,1999,37(11):2499-2518.
    [205]Berger C, Blauth R, Boger D, et al. Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality [J]. The Center for Quality Management Journal,1993,2(4): 2-36.
    [206]Tontini G. Integrating the Kana Model and QFD for designing new products[J]. Total Quality Management,2007,18(6):599-612.
    [207]Ankur C, Rajeev J A, Singh A R, et al. Integration of Kano's Model into quality function deploymen[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2010(53):689-698.
    [208]李朝玲,高齐圣.QFD中关联关系确定的正交实验设计方法[J].工业工程与管理,2009(1):24-27.
    [209]许叶军,达庆利.基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的多属性群决策方法[J].管理工程学报,2009,23(2):69-73.
    [210]Xu Z S. A note on Linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2006,15:593-604.
    [211]Sengupta A, Pal T K. On comparing interval numbers[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,127:28-43.
    [212]Liem T, Lucien D. Comparision of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2002,130:331-341.
    [213]Martin L, Colin B. Enhancing the quality function deployment conceptual design tool[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design,2007,129(7):701-708.
    [214]Zhang Z F, Chu X N. Fuzzy group decision-making for multi-format and multi-granularity linguistic judgments in quality function deploymen[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2009(36):9150-9158.
    [215]Pahl G, Beitz W. Engineering Design[M]. London:The Design Council,1984.
    [216]French M J. ConceptualDesign for Engineers[M]. Springer,1998.
    [217]邹慧君,张青,郭为忠.广义概念设计的普遍性内涵及理论基础的探讨[J].机械设计与研究,2004,20(3):10-14.
    [218]Cathy M, Johan S, Klaas D B, et al. PROMETHEE and AHP:The design of operational synergies in multicriteria anaysis.:Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,153(2):307-317.
    [219]William H. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,186(1):211-228.
    [220]左世全.谨防中国制造业掉入“三明治”陷阱[N].中国经济时报,2012,4,18.
    [221]孙林岩.服务型制造理论与实践[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.
    [222]简兆权,伍卓深.制造业服务化的路径选择研究—基于微笑曲线理论的观点[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(12):137-143.
    [223]Arnold T. Eight types of product-service System:eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from suspronet[J]. Business Strategy and the Enviroment,2004,13: 246-260.
    [224]郑力,江平宇,乔立红,等.制造系统研究的挑战和前沿[J].机械工程学报,2010,46(21):124-136.
    [225]江平宇,朱琦琦,张定红.工业产品服务系统及其研究现状[J].计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(9):2071-2078.
    [226]刘新艳.产品服务系统的效率分析[J].统计与决策,2009,17:183-184.
    [227]顾新建,李晓,祁国宁,等.产品服务系统理论和关键技术探讨[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2009,43(12):2237-2243.
    [228]吴贵生,蔺雷.我国制造企业“服务增强”的实证研究及政策建议[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(4):97-95.
    [229]张在房.顾客需求驱动的产品服务系统方案设计技术研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2011.
    [230]Baines T, Lightfoot H and Evans S. Product-service system revisited[C]. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR 2007), Leicester,2007.
    [231]Oliva R, Kallenberg R. Managing the transition from products to service [J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management,2003(14):160-172.
    [232]Heiko G. An Investigation of Antecedents for the development of customer support service in manufacturing companies[J]. Journal of Business-to Business Marketing, 2007,14(3):59-96.
    [233]Sawhey M. Balasubramanian S, Krishnan V V. Creating growth with services[J]. Sloan Management Review,2004(45):34-43.
    [234]James M T. Service:a system's perspective [J]. IEEE Systems Journal,2008,12(1): 146-157.
    [235]Lin Yong, Pekkarinen Saara. QFD-based modular logistics service design[J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2011,26(5):344-356.
    [236]王砚羽,张卓,杨睿.基于SE系数的服务业经济质量屋的改进及应用[J].科研管理,2012,33(4):48-54.
    [237]Xie M, Tan K C, Goh T N. Advanced QFD applications[M]. Dearborn, MI:ASQ Quality Press,2003.
    [238]刘宝碇,彭锦.不确定理论教程[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
    [239]徐玖平.运筹学与系统工程新进展[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700