用户名: 密码: 验证码:
单、双侧椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的临床比较分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
研究目的:通过比较分析单侧椎弓根入路与双侧椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折上的临床疗效及差异,探讨单侧椎弓根入路行椎体成形术的优势。
     方法:回顾性分析自2008年6月至2010年10月于我院行经皮椎体成形术的骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者30例病例共31个病椎,且术后随访超过了6个月,按手术方式分为经单侧椎弓根入路和经双侧椎弓根入路二组:单侧椎弓根入路组16例17节椎体,男7例,女9例,年龄55~82岁,平均67.8岁。双侧椎弓根入路组14例14节椎体,男6例,女8例,年龄58~80岁,平均68.3岁。骨折椎体为T9至L3,术前影像学检查证实所有病例均为骨质疏松性压缩性骨折,患者均在“C”型臂X线机引导下,经皮穿刺完成手术,术前术后进行临床和影像学观测分析。观测指标包括:手术时间,术中透视次数,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),活动能力评分,骨水泥渗漏情况等,统计比较两组数据结果。
     结果:所有患者手术均顺利完成。单侧入路组平均手术时间为(40.52土16.8)min,术中透视次数为(12.65士3.24)次,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)由术前的(7.6士1.8)分降至术后的(2.4士1.5)分,术后6个月为(2.6士1.3)分;活动能力评分术前平均为(2.82±0.73)分,术后改善至(1.32±0.31)分,术后6个月为(1.41±0.48)分。双侧入路组平均手术时间为(56.81士15.9)min;术中透视次数(22.32士4.58)次,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)由术前的(7.8士1.7)分降至术后的(2.5士1.3)分,术后6个月为(2.6士1.2)分,活动能力评分术前平均为(2.76±0.81)分,术后改善至(1.20±0.44)分,术后6个月为(1.36±0.53)分。两组相比较,手术时间与术中透视次数两项指标,有统计学差异(P <0.05),单侧组及双侧组在VAS、活动能力评分两项指标上,手术前与手术后比较,其差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),术后与术后6个月比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05),在VAS缓解、活动能力评分改善上两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。单侧入路组发生椎体前方渗漏1例,双侧入路组发生椎体前方及侧方骨水泥渗漏各1例,无肺栓塞、脑栓塞及脊髓、神经根损伤等并发症发生。术后平均随访6个月。手术椎体无疼痛加剧,无迟发性神经损伤表现,未发现手术椎体高度丢失。
     结论:经皮椎体形术是一种治疗老年人骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折安全有效的微创方法,单侧椎弓根入路经皮椎体成形术在治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折不仅能达双侧椎弓根入路相同的手术效果,而且具有手术时间短、放射暴露少、创伤小,费用低等优点,所以单侧椎弓根入路的椎体成形术是治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的可行及有效方法。
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the advantage of unipedicular approach vertebroplasty by comparing the clinical efficacy and differences between unipedicular and bipedicular approach vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
     Methods: Totally 30 patients with 31 symptomatic vertebrae of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures operated by vertebroplasty from June 2008 to October 2010 at the First Affiliated Hospital Of Shantou University were retrospectively analyses.All of them received more than 6 months’follow-up.They were divided into two groups on the basis of unilateral or bilateral of transpedicular operations.The unilateral group included of 7 men and 9 women with an average age of 67.8 (range from 55 to 82 years old).Only one vertebrate was involved in 15 cases,two vertebrates were involved in 1 cases. The bilateral group included of 6 men and 8 women, with an average age of 68.3 (range from 58 to 80 years old).Only one vertebrate was involved in all cases. The fracture of vertebral body was from T9 to L3, and it was confirmed that all cases were osteoporotic compression fractures by imaging studies preoperatively.All patients under the“C”type arm X-ray machine guided percutaneously finished the operation. Observation and analysis were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively. Observations included: surgical time, perspective times, visual analog pain score (VAS), activity ability score, and bone cement leakage. Statistical data results were compared between these two groups.
     Results: All patients tolerated the operation well.The average surgical time was (40.52±16.8)min for unilateral group and the perspective times were (12.65±3.24). The VAS was reduced to (2.4±1.5) from (7.6±1.8) preoperatively, and was (2.6±1.3) after 6 months’follow-up. Activity ability scores increased to (1.32±0.31) from (2.82±0.73) preoperatively, and was (1.41±0.48) after 6 months’follow-up. The average surgical time was (56.81±15.9)min for bilateral group and the perspective times were(22.32±4.58). The VAS was reduced to (2.3±1.3) from (7.6±1.5) preoperatively, and was (2.6±1.2) after 6 months’follow-up. Activity ability score increased to (1.20±0.44) from (2.82±0.73) preoperatively, and was (1.36±0.53) after 6 months’follow-up. Compared with these two groups, the surgical time and the perspective times were statistical significance differences(P <0.05); the preoperative and postoperative of VAS and activity ability scores between these two groups were statistical significance differences(P <0.05), while the postoperative and the 6 months’follow-up were no statistical significance differences(P >0.05). The recovery rate of VAS and activity ability scores between these two groups were no statistical significance differences(P >0.05). There was 1 case occured cement leakage in front of the vertebral body in the unilateral group, and there were 1case occured cement leakage in front of the vertebral body and 1 case occured cement leakage beside the vertebral body in the bilateral group respectively. There was no case of pulmonary embolism, cerebral embolism, spinal cord or nerve root injury and other complications. A mean follow-up postoperatively is 6 months. There is no alleviate pain in the operated vertebral body, no manifestation of delayed nerve injury, and no height loss of the operated vertebral body.
     Conclusion: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a safe and effective minimally invasive method for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly patients. Unipedicular approach vertebroplasty can not only achieve the same results of operations in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, but also has the advantages of shorter surgical time, less radiation exposure, less trauma, and lower cost, so unipedicular approach vertebroplasty is a practical and effective method in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
引文
[1].胡蕴玉.现代骨科基础与临床.北京人民卫生出版社,2006,348-351.
    [2].陈敏章,邵石扬,中华内科学:原发性骨质疏松症.北京人民卫生出版社,1999,3395-3401.
    [3].Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al.Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acylic vertebroplasty.Neurochirurgie,1987,33(2):166-168.
    [4].Deramond H,Priester C, Toussaint P,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty.Semin Museuloslceletal Radiol,1997,1(2):285-296.
    [5].任虎,申勇,杨大龙.经皮椎体成形术的研究进展.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(5):392-394.
    [6].Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC,et al.Biomechanical of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.Spine,1999,24(17):1772-1776.
    [7].Schlaich C, Minne HW, Bruckner T, et al.Reduced pulmonary function in patients with spinal osteoporotic fracture.Osteoporosis Int,1998,8(3):261-267.
    [8].Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, et a1.Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. Rheumatol,1999,26(10):2222-2228.
    [9].康南,海涌,鲁世保,等.单侧椎弓根穿刺椎体后凸成形术治疗椎体骨质疏松性压缩骨折.中华脊柱脊髓杂志,2008,18(5):366-367.
    [10].赵磊,王黎明,王钢锐等.单侧椎弓根穿刺经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折.中华外科杂志,2009,47(15):1196-1197.
    [11].Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM, et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty: A developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2001,22(2):373-381.
    [12].Zoarski GH, Snow P, Olan WJ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures;quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes.Vasc Interv Radiol,2002 ,13(2): 139-148.
    [13].徐宝山,胡永成,唐天驯,等.经皮椎体成形术的实验研究和临床应用.中华骨科杂志,2002,22(6):323.-324.
    [14].石锐,文浩,袁元,等.不同节段椎弓根内部结构的测量和比较.中国临床解剖学杂志,2005:23(5):458-462.
    [15].徐荣明,贾连顺,陈统一.当代脊柱外科内固定技术.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2006,6-9.
    [16].滕皋军,何仕诚,邓钢.经皮椎体成形术.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2005,69-70.
    [17].Silverman SL.The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture.Bone,1992,13(2): 27-31.
    [18].Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Erbe EM. et a1.Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. Spine, 2000;25(9):1061-1064.
    [19].Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B, et a1.Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics, 1998,18(2):311-320.
    [20].Coumans JV, Reinhardt MK, Lieberman IH,et al.Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures:1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study. Neurosurg, 2003;99(1):44-50.
    [21].Rao RD, Singrakhia MD.Painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture. pathogenesis,evaluation,and roles of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in its management.Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003;85(10):2010-2022.
    [22].Wilson DR, Myers ER, Mathis JM, et al.Effects of augmentation on the mechanies of vertebral wedge fractures. Spine, 2000,25(2):158-165.
    [23].Liebschner MA, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM. Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroolasty.Spine, 2001,26(14):1547-1554.
    [24].Steinmann J, Tingey CT, Cruz G, et al.Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty. Spine, 2005;30(2):201-205.
    [25].张亮,陈统一,陈中伟.经单或双侧椎弓根灌注自固化磷酸钙骨水泥椎体成形的效果比较.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(9):549-552.
    [26].Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA..New technologies in spine:Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.Spine,2001,26(14):1511-1515.
    [27].Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Erbe EM,, et al. Biomeehanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. Spine, 2000,25(9):1061-1064.
    [28].Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. the effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.Spine, 2003,28(14):1549-1554.
    [29].Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, et al.Pereutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization.Spine,2000,25(8):923-928.
    [30].Chung HJ, Chung KJ, Yoon HS, et al.Comparative study of balloon kyphoplasty with unilateral versus bilateral approach in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Int Orthop,2008,32(6): 817-820.
    [31].Higgins KB, Harten RD, Langrana NA, et a1.Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae.Spine, 2003,28(14):1540-1547.
    [32].Kim AK, Jensen ME, Dion JE, et al.Unilateral transpedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty:initial experience.Radiology, 2002 ,222(3):737-741.
    [1].Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al.Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie, 1987,33( 2) :166-168.
    [2].Galibert P, Deramond H. Percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty as a treatment of vertebral angiom a as w ell as painful and debilitating diseases.Chirurgie,1990,116( 3):326- 334.
    [3].胡永胜,马原,田慧中,等.经皮椎体成形术的临床应用.中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(18 ):1392.
    [4].景元海,杨小玉,赵丛然,等.经皮椎体注入骨水泥治疗老年脊椎骨质疏松压缩性骨折.中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11( 32 ) :6484.
    [5].Deramond H, Depriester C, Toussaint P, et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty.Semin Muscu loskelet Radiol,1997,1(2):285 -296.
    [6].Evans AJ, Jensen ME, Kip KE, et al.Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty retrospective report 245 cases.Radiology, 2003, 226:3662- 3721.
    [7].McGraw JK, Lippert JA, Minkus KD, et al.Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients under going percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow-up.Vasc Interv Radiol, 2002,13(9):883 -886.
    [8].Martin JB,Jean B, Sugiu K,et al. Vertebrplasty clinical experience and follow-up results..bone ,1999, 252 (l):11-15.
    [9].Cortet B, CottonA, Boutry N,et al.percutaneous vetebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open. prospective study. Rheumatol 1999:26(10):2222-2228.
    [10].Matthew J, Kieran P, Bone C, Review of their physiochemical and biochemical properties in percutaneous vertebroplasty.AJNR,2004,25( 12 ):1286-1290.
    [11].SanMillan Ruiz D, Burkhardt K, Jean B, et al.Pathology findings with acrylic implants.Bone,1999, 25(2):85-90.
    [12].Raj D, Rao RD,Singrakhia MD. Painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture, pathogenesis, evaluation and roles of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in its management.Bone Joint Surgery,2003,85:2010-2022.
    [13].Paul A, Hulme MSc, Stephen J, et a1.Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies.Spine,2006,23(17):1983-2001.
    [14].郑召民,警惕和预防经皮椎体强化术的严重并发症.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2008,18( 5):328-329.
    [15].Jack C, Childers Jr. Cardiovascular collapse and death during vertebroplasty.Radiology,2003,22(8): 902-903.
    [16].Aebli N, Fenton DC, Cooper C,et al.Pressurization of vertebral bodies during vertebroplasty causes cardiovascular complication:an experimental study in sheep.Spine,2003,28(14):1513-1520.
    [17].Vasconcelos C, Gailloud P, Martin JB, et al. Transient arterial hypotension induced by polymethylmethacrylate injection during percutaneous vertebroplasty.Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001,1(2): 1001- 1002.
    [18].Aebli N, Krebs J, Davis G, et a1.Fat embolism and acute hypotension during vertebroplasty:an experimental study in sheep.Spine,2002,27(5):460-466.
    [19].顾冬云,戴魁戎,张鹏.椎体成形术的生物力学研究.中华骨科杂志,2006,26(6):421-423.
    [20].Rotter P, Flugmaeher D, Kandzior A,et a1.Biomechanical in vitro testing of human osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae following prophylactic kyphoplasty with different candidate materials.Spine,2007, 32(13):1400-1405.
    [21].Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA, et al. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures.Spine,2001,26 (14 ) :15511-1515.
    [22].邓忠良,柯珍勇,陈富,等.sky骨扩张器系统在经皮椎体后凸成形术中的初步临床应用.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15:162-165.
    [23].Hoshino M, Nakamura H, Konishi S, et al. Endoscopic vertebroplasty for the treatment of chronic vertebral compression fravture :technical note. Spine,2005:461- 467.
    [24].陈艺,白波,孙辉,等.可注射磷酸钙骨水泥在经皮椎体后凸成形术中的体外生物力学评价.中华生物医学工程杂志,2007,13 ( 4):216.
    [25].白楚杰,张烽,董启榕,等.应用三维有限元法评估聚甲苦丙烯酸甲酯和磷酸钙骨水泥铸件的力学特征.中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11 (12) :4313.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700