用户名: 密码: 验证码:
滇东北地区铅锌矿床成矿作用与成矿规律
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
以沉积岩为容矿围岩的铅锌矿床种类繁多,储量巨大,成因复杂。详细研究这类矿床的特征和成因,不仅有助于加深了解这类矿床的成矿作用,丰富铅锌矿床成矿理论,而且有助于揭示区域矿床成矿规律,为成矿预测和区域找矿提供科学依据。
     滇东北铅锌矿区是我国著名的川滇黔铅锌成矿带的重要组成部分,区内已发现大量以沉积岩为容矿围岩的铅锌(银)矿床。本文系统收集了前人的研究资料,详细论述了区内5个典型铅锌矿床的矿区地质、矿床地质和矿床地球化学特征,并在此基础上提出了区域铅锌矿类型划分方案,分析了控矿因素和成矿作用。通过这些工作,论文取得了以下主要成果和认识。
     (1)根据赋矿层位的不同,滇东北地区以沉积岩为容矿围岩的铅锌矿床可以划分为三类。第一类为赋存于震旦系上统灯影组-寒武系下统渔户村组中的铅锌矿床(代表性矿床如巧家县茂租铅锌矿床、永善县金沙厂铅锌矿床和会泽县五星厂铅锌矿床等)以及赋存于石炭系下统摆佐组中的铅锌矿床(代表性矿床如会泽县麒麟厂铅锌矿床和会泽县矿山厂铅锌矿床等)。第二类为赋存于泥盆系上统宰格组中的铅锌矿床(代表性矿床如彝良县毛坪铅锌矿床)。该类矿床受断裂控制十分明显,有的矿体直接产在断裂带中(如鲁甸县乐马厂铅锌矿床等)。第三类为赋存于二叠系下统茅口组碳酸盐中的铅锌矿床(代表性矿床如罗平县富乐厂铅锌矿床和会泽县大海铅锌矿床等)。各类矿床具有不同的赋矿地层岩性组合、控矿构造、岩相古地理以及矿石类型、矿物组合和结构构造。
     (2)滇东北地区的铅锌矿床明显受地层层位控制,主要的赋矿层位有震旦系上统、寒武系中-下统、泥盆系中-上统、石炭系中-下统及二叠系下统。从空间上来看,从茂租到毛坪和会泽再到富乐厂(即从NW向SE),滇东北地区铅锌矿床的赋矿层位逐渐变新(即从Zbdn到D_3zg、C_1b和C_2w再到P1m),岩性组合由复杂到简单(即从白云岩、灰岩、硅质白云岩、含磷硅质白云岩和硅质岩到白云岩、灰岩、硅质灰岩和硅质白云岩再到白云岩)。
     (3)寒武系中、下统及下伏地层是主要矿源层,为成矿提供了大量成矿物质,而奥陶系下统-二叠系下统及峨眉山玄武岩层是次要矿源层,可能为成矿提供了部分成矿物质,为次要矿源层。
     (4)滇东北地区铅锌矿床的形成主要受北西向的断陷盆地和同生断裂控制,而北东向断裂不仅对产于盖层中的铅锌矿床进行改造作用,同时还为热液矿床(点)、矿化点的形成提供了热动力条件。
     (5)成矿流体来源复杂,包括深源岩浆水、基底变质岩系中的变质水和大气降水,但主要来源于大气降水。成矿流体性质为浅成中-低温、中-高盐度、中偏弱酸性的Na~+-Ca~(2+)-Cl~-- SO_4~(2-)型热水溶液。
     (6)通过矿床地质特征、形成条件、成矿时代、控矿因素和成矿机制研究,将滇东北地区以沉积岩为容矿围岩的铅锌矿床按成矿作用划分为海底热水沉积-叠加改造型、热液型(可进一步分为非断裂带热液和断裂带热液亚型)和热水沉积型等三类铅锌矿床,对应于按赋矿地层划分的三类铅锌矿床。这三类铅锌矿床分别是由海底热水沉积-叠加改造成矿作用、热液成矿作用和热水沉积成矿作用形成的。其中第一类型矿床数量多、规模大、品位高,是该区主要的矿床类型,而热液型中的断裂带热液亚型铅锌矿床在本区属于首次发现。
The sedimentary rock-hosted lead-zinc deposit is more in type, huge in reserve, and complicated in origin. To study its characteristics and origin will contribute not only to better understanding of the mineralization so as to enrich the metallogenic theory, but also to revealing of the regional metallogenic pattern to provide scientific evidence for metallogenic prediction and regional exploitation.
     A large quantity of sedimentary rock-hosted lead-zinc deposits occur in Northeast Yunnan, constituting an important part of the noted lead-zinc metallogenic belt in Sichuan-Yunnan-Guizhou, China. Numerous previous data have been systematically collected, and a detailed study has been carried out on five typical lead-zinc deposits in this region. On the basis of the data and study, the orefield geological and ore deposit geological and geochemical characteristics have been ascertained, leading to propose a classification of the lead-zinc deposits in the region and laying basis for analysis of the ore-controlling factors and mineralization.
     The following are major achievements obtained in this dissertation.
     1. The lead-zinc deposits in Northeast Yunnan can be divided into three types based on their host stratohorizon. The first type is hosted in the Dengying Formation of the Upper Sinian to the Yuhucun Formation of the Lower Cambrian (such as lead-zinc deposits located at Maozu in Qiaojia County, Jinshachang in Yongshan County, and Wuxingchang in Huize County, etc.), as well as in the Baizuo Formation of the Lower Carboniferous (such as lead-zinc deposits at Qilinchang and Kuangshanchang in Huize County, etc.).The second type is distributed in the Zaige Formation of the Upper Devonian (such as Maoping deposit in Yiliang County). The deposits of this type are obviously controlled by faults, and some orebodies occur directly in the fault zone (such as Lemachang deposit in Ludian County). The third type occurs in the Maokou Formation of the Lower Permian (such as deposits at Fulechang in Luoping and Dahai in Huize County, etc.). These types of deposits have different lithological assemblages of host strata, ore-controlling structures, lithofacies paleogeography, as well as ore characteristics including type, mineral and texture and structure.
     2. The lead and zinc deposits in Northeast Yunnan are obviously controlled by the stratohorizons of the strata. The major stratohorizons-hosted include Upper Sinian, Middle to Lower Cambrian, Middle to Upper Devonian, Middle to Lower Carboniferous and Lower Permian. In space, the stratohorizons of the lead and zinc deposits in the region vary from Zbdn at Maozu through D_3zg, C_1b and C_2w at Maoping and Huize to P1m at Fulechang, tending to gradually become newer from NW to SE. Correspondingly, the lithological assemblages of the stratohorizons change from dolomite, limestone, siliceous dolomite, phosphor-bearing siliceous dolomite and silicolite at Maozu through dolomite, limestone, siliceous limestone and siliceous dolomite at Huize to dolomite at Fulechang, indicating a trend from complicated to simple.
     3. The Middle to Lower Cambrian and underlying strata are a major source bed, providing much material for mineralization, while the Lower Ordovician to the Lower Permian as well as Emeishan Basalt horizon are a second source bed, possibly providing a part of ore-forming materials.
     4. The formation process of the lead and zinc deposits in the northeast region of Yunnan is mainly controlled by NW fault basins and contemporaneous faults. In contrast, the NE faults not only give modification to lead and zinc deposits in the overburden, but also provide thermo-motive conditions for the formation of hydrothermal deposits and spots.
     5. The ore-forming fluid is complex in source, derived mainly from meteoric water, and some from deep-source magmatic water and metamorphic water in metamorphic series of basement. This fluid is Na~+-Ca~(2+)-Cl~--SO_4~(2-)type hydrothermal solution with moderate to low temperature, high to moderate salinity, and moderate to low acidity.
     6. The study on the geological characteristics, ore-forming conditions, ore-controlling factors and mineralization mechanisms supports classification of the sedimentary rock-hosted lead and zinc deposits in Northeast Yunnan into three types based on mineralization, corresponding to classification of them into the three types based on host stratohorizon. These three types are submarine hot-water deposit-superposition and reformation, hot-water deposit, and hydrothermal types (including non-fault-zone and fault-zone hydrothermal sub-types). Among them, the first type of deposit with large quantity, large scale and high grade is the major one in this region, and the fault-zone hydrothermal sub-type is the one discovered for the first time in this region.
引文
Alt J C, Shanks W C, Jackson M C. Cycling of Sulfur in Subduction Zones; the Geochemistry of Sulfur in the Mariana Island Arc and Back-arc Trough. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1993, 119(4): 477-494
    Augustin N, Lackschewitz K S, Kuhn T, et al. Mineralogical and Chemical Mass Changes in Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks from the Logatchev Hydrothermal Field (M A R 15°N). Marine Geology, 2008, 256(1/4): 18-29
    Binns R A, Scott S D, Bogdanov Y A, et al. Hydrothermal Oxide and Gold-rich Sulfate Deposits of Franklin Seamount, Western Woodlark Basin,Papua New Guinea. Economic Geology, 1993, 88(8): 2122-2153
    Bischoff J L, Rosenbauser R J. Salinity Variations in Submarine Hydrothermal Systems by Layered Double-diffusive Convectio. The Journal of Geology, 1989, 97: 613-623
    Briskey J A. Descriptive Model of Sedimentary Exhalative Zn-Pb, in Mineral Deposit Models, Cox D P, Singer D A, Editors. U. S. Geological Survey, 1986, 211-215
    Canet C. Origin of the mineralizing fluids from the Carboniferous sedex deposits of L'Alforja (SW Catalonian Coastal Ranges,Spain). Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2003, 513-517
    Carne R C,Cathro R J. Sedimentary-exhalative(Sedex)Zn-Pb-Ag Deposits, Northern Canadian Cordillera; Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Bulletin, 1982, 75: 66-78
    Cyamex Sientific Team.First manned submersible dives on the East Pacific Rise at 21°N ( Project RITA) : General results. Marine Geologys Res. 1981, (4): 345-379
    Doe R B. Lead Isotopes. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1970, 137
    Fouquet Y. Where are the Hydrothermal Sulfide Deposits in the Ocean? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1997, 355: 427-441
    Francheteau J, Needham H D, Choukroune P, et al. Massive Deep-sea Sulphide Ore Deposits Discovered on the East Pacific Rise. Nature, 1979, 277: 523-528
    Franklin J M, Sangster D M, Lydon J W. Volcanic-associated Massive Sulfide Deposits\\ Skinner B J. Economic Geology Seventy-fifth Anniversary Volume. Littleton: Society of Economic Geologists, 1981: 485-627
    Halbach P, Nakamura K, Wahsner M, et al. Probable Modern Analogue of Kuroko-type Massive Sulphide Deposits in the Okinawa Trough Back-arc Basin. Nature, 1989, 338: 496-499
    Halbach P, Pracejus B,Maerten A. Geology and Mineralogy of Massive Sulfide Ores from the Central Okinawa Trough, Japan. Economic Geology, 1993, 88(8): 2210-2225
    Hekinia R, Fevrier, et al. Sulfur deposits from the East Pacific Rise 21°N. Science. 1980, 207: 1433-1444
    Herzig P M, Hannington M D. Polymetallic Massive Sulfides at the Modern Seaf loor: a Review. Ore Geology Reviews, 1995, 10(2): 95-115
    Horibe Y, Kim K R, Craig H. Hydrothermal Methane Plumes in the Mariana Back-arc Spreading Centre. Nature, 1986, 324: 131-133
    Hutchinson R W. Massive base metal sulfide deposits in sedimentary rocks and their metllogenic relationship during Proterozoic time, In Paper presented at joint meeting of AIME-SEG, Chicago. Abstract in Econ Geol, 1973, 68: 138
    Jamesa R H, Rudnickib M D, Palmerc M R. The Alkali Element and Boron Geochemistry of the Escanaba Trough Sediment-hosted Hydrothermal System. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1999, 171(1): 157-169
    Large D E. Sediment-hosted Submarine Exhalatice Sulphide Deposits-a Review of their Geological Characteristics and Genesis, in Handbook of Stratabound and Stratiform Ore Deposits, Wolf K F, Editor. Geological Association of Canada, 1981, 9: 459-507
    Large D E. Sediment-hosted Submarine Exhalatice Sulphide Deposits, in Short Course in Sedimentary Stratiform Lead-zinc Deposits, Sangster D F, Editor. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Victoria, 1983, 11-29
    Lydon J M. Chemical parameters controlling the origin and deposition of sediment-hosted stratiform lead-zinc deposits,in Short Course in Sedimentary Stratiform Lead-zinc Deposits, Sangster D F, Editor. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Victoria, 1983, 175-250
    Lydon J W. Ore Deposit Models 14, Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits Part 2: Tenetic Models. Geoscience Canada, 1988, 15(1): 43-65
    Maucher A. In handbook of stratabound and stratiform ore deposits. Edited by K H wolf, 1976, 7, 477-504
    Ohmoto H, Skinner B J. The Kuroko and Related Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits. Littleton: Economic Geology Publishing Company, 1983
    Ohmoto H. Formation of Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits: the Kuroko Perspective. Ore Geology Reviews, 1996, 10(3/6): 135-177
    Roedder E, Weiblen P W. Lunar Petrology of Silicate Melt Inclusions, Apollo 11 Rocks∥Levinson A A. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Supplement Volume 1: Mineralogy and Petrology. New York: Pergammon Press, 1970: 801-837
    Rona P A, Hydrothermal mineralization at occeanic ridges. Journal of the mineralogical association of Canada. 1988, 266(3) : 431-465
    Rona P A, Hannington M D,Raman C V, et al. Active and Relict Sea-floor Hydrothermal Mineralization at the TAG Hydrothermal Field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Economic Geology, 1993, 88(8): 1989-2017
    Rona P A, Scott S D. A Special Issue on Seafloor Hydrothermal Mineralization; New Perspectives; Preface. Economic Geology, 1993, 88(8): 1935-1976
    Russell M J. Major sediment-host exhalative zinc-lead deposits: formation from hydrothermal convection cells that deepen during crustal extension, in Short Course in Sedimentary Stratiform Lead-zinc Deposits, Sangster D F, Editor. Mineralogical Association of Canada,Victoria, 1983, 251-282
    Schmidt K, Koschinsky A, Garbe Schoenberg D, et al. Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Fluids From the Ultramafic-hosted Logatchev Hydrothermal Field, 15°N on the Mid-Atalantic Ridge; Temporal and Spatial Investigation. Chemical Geology, 2007, 242(1/2): 1-21
    Taylor H P. Oxygen and Hydrogen Isotope Relationships in Hydrothermal Mineral Deposits∥Barnes H L. Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1979: 236-277
    Urabe T, Marumo K.A New Model for Kuroko-type Depo-sits of Japan. Episodes, 1991, 14(3): 246-251
    Wheat C G, Mottl M J. Hydrothermal Circulation, Juan de Fuca Ridge Eastern Flank: Factors Controlling Basement Water Composition. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99(B2): 3067-3080.
    Whitney J A. Volatiles in Magmatic Systems.Reviews in Economic Geology, 1984, 1: 155-175.
    Yang K H, Scott S D. Possible Contribution of a Metal-rich Magmatic Fluid to a Sea-floor Hydrothermal System. Nature, 1996, 383: 420-423.
    Yang K H, Scott S D. Magmatic Degassing of Volatiles and Ore Metals into a Hydrothermal System on the Modern Sea Floor of the Eastern Manus Back-arc Basin, Western Pacific. Economic Geology, 2002, 97(5): 1079-1100.
    Zartman R E, Doe B R. Plumbotectonics-the model. Tectonophysics, 1981, 75: 135-162
    陈先沛,高计元,陈多福.热水沉积作用的概念和几个岩石学标志.沉积学报,1992,03:131-139
    陈先沛,祁思敬.热水沉积成矿作用.中国科学院矿床地球化学开发实验室著.矿床地球化学.北京:地质出版社,1997:248-265
    陈多福,陈先沛,陈光谦,等.热水沉积作用与成矿效应.地质地球化学,1997,04:7-12
    陈进.麒麟厂铅锌硫化物矿床成因及成矿模式探讨.有色金属矿床与勘探,1993,2(2):85-89
    陈启良.滇东北渔户村组内的富铅锌矿床成矿地质特征及成因.云南地质,2001,2:189-194
    陈启良.滇东北渔户村组富铅锌矿成矿地质特征及找矿标志.地质与勘探,2002,01:22
    陈士杰.黔西滇东北铅锌矿床的沉积成因探讨.贵州地质,1986,8(3):41-48
    陈守余,赵鹏大,胡光道.云南澜沧江中南段多金属成矿谱系分析.地质找矿论丛,2007,03:14-20
    陈延生,李元.会泽铅锌矿床成因问题探讨.矿业工程,2005,3(6):14-16
    崔汝勇.大洋中大型热液硫化物矿床的形成条件.海洋地动态,2001,17(2): 1-4
    崔银亮.试论卤水成矿作用的几个基本问题.西南矿产地质,1994,8(3):16-22
    崔银亮,张云峰,郭欣,等.滇东北铅锌银矿床遥感地质与成矿预测.北京:地质出版社,2011
    戴问天.海底热液沉积成矿.地质与勘探,1985,(6):22-28地质矿产部.铅锌矿区勘探类型实例. 1984
    方华,杨继林,吴代成,等.麒麟厂铅锌矿床稳定同位素特征及成因探讨.有色金属矿床与勘探,2000,9(1-2):114-116
    德赫姆,李沛生.世界铅锌矿地质.北京:地质出版社,1959
    D F桑斯特.现代海底热液活动系统.国外矿床地质增刊. 1985,26-33
    D F桑斯特.以沉积岩为容矿岩石的喷气矿床.国外矿床地质增刊. 1985,52-61
    高永宝,薛春纪,曾荣.滇西北兰坪金顶铅锌矿床有机物质地球化学.地球化学,2008,03:28-37
    顾连兴,徐克勤.论大陆地壳拗陷带中的华南型块状硫化物矿床.矿床地质,1986,02:3-15
    顾连兴,徐克勤.论长江中、下游中石炭世海底块状硫化物矿床.地质学报,1986,02:64-76+106
    顾连兴.块状硫化物矿床研究进展评述.地质评论,1999,45(3):265-275
    顾连兴,胡文瑄,倪培,等.再论大陆地壳断裂拗陷带中的华南型块状硫化物矿床,2003,9(4):100-116
    顾连兴,郑远川,唐晓茜,等.硫化物矿石若干结构及相关成矿理论研究进展.自然科学进展,2006,16(2):20-33
    郭欣.滇东北金沙厂铅锌矿成矿特征及其深部外围远景预测.矿产与地质,2007,06:32-37
    韩润生,陈进,李元,等.云南会泽麒麟厂铅锌矿床八号矿体的发现.地质地球化学,2001,03:191-195
    韩润生,陈进,李元,等.云南会泽铅锌矿床构造控矿规律及其隐伏矿预测.矿物学报,2001,02:147-151
    韩润生,刘丛强,黄智龙,等.论云南会泽富铅锌矿床成矿模式.矿物学报,2001,21(4):674-680
    韩润生,邹海俊,刘鸿.滇东北铅锌银矿床成矿规律及构造地球化学找矿.云南地质,2006,04:6-8
    韩润生,王峰,赵高山,等.滇东北矿集区昭通毛坪铅锌矿床深部找矿新进展.地学前缘,2010,17(3):277
    何庆荣.云南罗平富乐厂多金属矿储量报告书.云南省地质局罗平队. 1959
    侯增谦.现代海底热液成矿作用研究现状及发展方向.地学前缘,1996,9(3):263-273
    黄智龙,陈进,刘丛强,等.峨眉山玄武岩与铅锌矿床成矿关系初探—以云南会泽铅锌矿床为例.矿物学报,2001b,21(4):681-688
    黄智龙,陈进,韩润生,等.云南会泽超大型铅锌矿床地球化学及成因:兼论峨眉山玄武岩与铅锌矿成矿的关系.北京:地质出版社. 2004
    隗合明.海底喷流一沉积成矿说及其找矿意义.地质科技情报,1987,6(4):87-93
    贺胜辉,荣惠锋,尚卫,等.云南茂租铅-锌矿床地质特征及成因研究.矿产与地质,2006,z1:74-79
    侯增谦,莫宣学.现代海底热液成矿作用研究现状及发展方向.地学前缘,1996,04:104-114
    侯增谦,艾永德,曲晓明,等.岩浆流体对冲绳海槽海底成矿热水系统的可能贡献.地质学报, 1999, 01:59-67
    阙梅英,罗安屏,张立生,等.滇东北上震旦-下寒武流层控铅锌矿.成都:成都科技大学出版社,1993
    吕志成.国内外铅锌矿床成矿理论与找矿方法.中国地质调查局发展中心,2004
    李波.云南巧家松梁铅锌矿床地质特征及构造地球化学异常模式:[硕士学位论文].云南:昆明理工大学,2008
    李波.滇东北地区会泽、松梁铅锌矿床流体地球化学与构造地球化学研究:[博士学位论文]. 云南:昆明理工大学,2010
    李波,韩润生,邹海俊,等.云南巧家松梁铅锌矿控矿因素及找矿方向.云南地质,2006,04:46-47
    李波,韩润生,顾晓春,等.云南巧家松梁铅锌矿床Ⅰ号矿体构造原生晕轴向分带序列.矿产与地质,2009,02:4-10
    李波,韩润生,顾晓春,等.滇东北松梁铅锌矿床控矿断裂构造岩微量元素的R型因子分析及其地质意义.矿物岩石,2009,01:54-61
    李友川,张爱云.黔西南下三叠统金矿床有机地球化学特征及其成矿意义.地球化学,1997, 26(4):36-43
    李芳.海底喷气成因热水沉积成矿理论研究综述.地质科技情报,1993,02:85-88
    李家盛,李采一,崔银亮,等.云南或者铅锌矿喷流沉积成因研究. 2005,93:14-23
    李连举.滇东北铅、锌、银矿床矿源层问题探讨.有色金属矿产与勘察,1999,8(6):333-339
    李文博,黄智龙,陈进,等.会泽超大型铅锌矿床成矿时代研究.矿物学报,2004b,24(2):112-116
    李文渊.现代海底热液成矿作用.地球科学与环境学报,2010,01:19-27
    李才先.滇东北铅锌(银)成矿规律.云南地质,2005,24(3):275-281
    刘锋.云南会泽大型铅锌矿床成矿机制及锗的赋存状态:[硕士论文].北京:中国地质科学研究院,2005
    刘树根,黄文明,陈翠华,等.四川盆地震旦系—古生界热液作用及其成藏成矿效应初探.矿物岩石,2008,03:43-52
    刘文周,王奖臻,李泽琴.康滇地轴东缘铅锌矿床地球化学特征.矿床地质,1998b,21(增):173-176
    刘文周,徐新煌.论滇川黔铅锌成矿带矿床与构造的关系.成都理工学院学报,1996,23(l):71-77
    刘文周.云南金沙厂铅锌矿床地质特征及成因探讨.成都地质学院学报,1989,(2):l-9
    刘文周.几茂租铅锌矿床地质特征及其成因探讨.矿床地质,1998,17(增):637-640
    刘文周.云南茂租铅锌矿矿床地质地球化学特征及成矿机制分析.成都理工大学学报,2009,36(5):480-486
    柳贺昌,林文达.滇东北铅锌银矿产规律研究.昆明:云南大学出版社.1999
    柳贺昌.滇、川、黔铅锌成矿区的构造控矿.云南地质,1995a,14(3):173-189
    柳贺昌.滇川黔铅锌成矿区的成矿模式.云南地质,1996a,15(1):41-51
    柳贺昌.滇川黔成矿区的铅锌矿源层(岩).地质与勘探,1996b,32(2):12-18
    林方成.扬子地台西缘大渡河谷超大型层状铅锌矿床地质地球化学特征及成因.地质学报,2005,04:109-125+152-153
    林方成.四川汉源黑区_雪区层状铅锌矿床典型矿石组构与成因.矿床地质,2005,02:38-49
    林方成,潘桂棠.四川大渡河谷灯影期层状铅锌矿床中震积岩的发现及其成矿意义.中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2006,11:24-34
    龙汉生,蒋绍平,石增龙,等.云南澜沧老厂大型银铅锌多金属矿床地质地球化学特征.矿物学报,2007:135-140
    马茁卉.我国铅锌资源现状及发展政策建议.西部资源,2008,02:23-27 南延宗.中国银铅锌矿述略.
    仇定茂.云南永善金沙矿区的上部铅锌矿床.沉积与特提斯地质,2000,02:84-92
    钱年奕,胡瑟丽,王廷国.滇东北铅锌成矿带成矿条件分析.华南地质与矿产,2010,03:36-43
    饶天龙.云南铅锌资源基本特征及超大型铅锌矿床找矿前景.中国矿业,2008,03:110-113
    芮宗瑶.海底喷气沉积矿床研究的新进展.国外矿床地质,1989,2:1-5
    芮宗瑶,冶金华,张立生,等.扬子克拉通周边及其隆起边缘的铅锌矿床.中国地质,2004,31(4):337-346
    沈冰.川黔滇层控型铅锌矿成矿特征.云南地质,2004,23(2):207-211
    孙枢.大洋钻探与中国地球科学.地球科学进展,1995,10(3):213-214
    田毓龙,秦德先,林幼斌,等.喷流热水沉积矿床研究的现状与进展.昆明理工大学学报, 1999,24(1):150-156
    田云华,李定远,杨军,等.湖北青峰断裂带地区铅锌矿控矿条件及成矿规律.国土资源大调查论文专辑,2004,(52):34-38
    涂光炽,等.中国层控矿床地球化学(第三卷).北京:科学出版社,1988:388
    涂光炽,王秀璋,陈先沛,等.中国层控矿床地球化学研究.化学通报,1989,10:18-21
    王超伟,李元,罗海燕,等.云南毛坪铅锌矿床的成因探讨.昆明理工大学学报,2009,34(1):7-11
    王崇武,钟维敷,周云满.鲁甸乐马厂银矿床地质特征及形成条件.云南地质,1995,14(1):14-27
    王奖臻,李朝阳,李泽琴,等.川、滇、黔交界地区密西西比河谷型铅锌矿床与美国同类矿床的对比.矿物岩石地球化学通报,2002,21(2):127-132
    王奖臻,李朝阳,李泽琴,等.川滇黔地区密西西比河谷型铅锌矿床成矿地质背景及成因探讨.地质地球化学,2001,29(2):41-45
    王若宾.云南省会泽铅锌矿现状及矿床成因探讨.大众科技,2010,01:93-95
    王晓虎,薛春纪,李智明,等.扬子陆块北缘马元铅锌矿床地质和地球化学特征.矿床地质,2008,27(1):37-48
    王旋.昭通彝良毛坪铅锌矿河东地区构造地区化学找矿应用研究:[硕士学位论文].云南:昆明理工大学,2010
    王雅丽,崔银亮.滇东北及毛坪铅锌矿遥感地质与成矿预测.云南地质,2010,04:68-73
    薛步高,吴良士.云南银(铅)-锌矿开发史料与找矿探讨.矿床地质,2002,03:88-93
    薛步高.超大型会泽富锗铅锌矿复合成因.云南地质,2006,25(2):143-159
    薛春纪,祁思敬,郑明华,等.热水沉积研究及相关科学问题.矿物岩石地球化学通讯报,2000,03:18-26
    薛春纪,高永宝,Guoxiang Chi,等.滇西兰坪盆地金顶矿田有机物质.见:陈毓川,毛景文,薛春纪主编,第八届全国矿床会议论文集,北京:地质出版社. 2006:346-348
    薛春纪,高永宝,曾荣,等.滇西北兰坪盆地金顶超大型矿床有机岩相学和地球化学.岩石学报,2007,11:227-238
    熊永柱,夏斌,林丽,等.热水沉积成矿研究现状与展望.矿产与地质,2005,6:233-238
    熊亮,朱杰勇,朱林生,等.滇东北铅锌成矿带会泽金牛厂筇竹寺组含矿层的发现及意义.矿产与地质,2010,06:29-34
    杨翰魁.马关八梅喷流沉积铅锌锡铜金多金属矿床.云南地质,2008,02:53-58
    杨庆坤,郭福生,姜勇彪.沉积岩型铅锌矿床的成因机制及其硫源类型.采矿技术,2010,05:101-104
    杨永强,翟裕生,侯玉树,等.沉积岩型铅锌矿床的成矿系统研究.地学前缘,2006,03:204-209
    颜文,李朝阳.热水喷流沉积成矿与地学思维.地球科学进展,1993,8(2):40-46
    严鑫熔.会泽铅锌矿床的成矿模式及成矿预测:[硕士学位论文].昆明:昆明理工大学,2007
    叶杰,刘建明,张安立,等.沉积喷流型矿化的岩石学证据——以大兴安岭南段黄岗和大井矿床为例.岩石学报,2002,04:155-162+179-180
    叶庆桐.怒江、澜沧江、金沙江地区铅锌矿床成矿特征和成矿系列.北京:科学出版社. 1991
    易昌华、庐金彩,等.云南乐马厂铅银矿区普查报告书.冶金部地质局云南分局滇中普查队. 1956
    云南省地质矿产局.云南区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1990
    云南地矿资源股份有限公司.云南省鲁甸县乐红铅锌矿地质详查报告. 2002
    张长青.川滇黔地区MVT铅锌矿床分布、特征及成因研究:[硕士学位论文].北京:中国地质大学,2005
    张长青.中国川滇黔交界地区密西西比型(MVT)铅锌矿床成矿模型:[博士学位论文].北京:中国地质科学院,2008
    张长青,毛景文,吴锁平,等.川滇黔地区MVT铅锌矿床分布、特征及成因.矿床地质,2005a,24(3):317-324
    张长青,毛景文,刘峰,等.云南会泽铅锌矿床粘土矿物K-Ar测年及其地质意义.矿床地质,2005b,24(3):336-348
    张位及.试论滇东北Pb-Zn矿床的沉积成因和成矿规律.地质与勘探,1984,(7):11-16
    张志斌,李朝阳,涂光炽,等.川、滇、黔接壤地区铅锌矿床产出的大地构造演化背景及成矿作用.大地构造与成矿学,2006,30(3):343-354
    张振亮,黄智龙,饶冰,等.会泽铅锌矿床成矿流体研究.地质找矿论丛,2005,02:44-51
    张振亮,黄智龙,饶冰,等. 2005.会泽铅锌矿床成矿流体浓缩机制.地球科学—中国地质大学学报,30(4):443-449
    郑庆鳌.云南会泽矿山厂、麒麟厂铅锌矿床对流循环成矿及热水溶硐赋存块状富铅锌矿床的实践认识.西南矿产地质,1997
    朱章森,吴香尧,胡运来.怒江-澜沧江-金沙江地区锡铅锌矿找矿靶区预测.北京:地质出版社. 1992
    赵准.滇东、滇东北地区铅锌矿床的成矿模式.云南地质,1995,14(4):350-354
    赵准.兰坪金顶铅锌矿——陆相SEDEX型矿床.云南地质,2007,01:3-16
    郑明秋.鲁甸乐马厂银矿床矿石物质组分及赋银特征初步研究.云南地质,1995,14(1):28-38
    祝朝辉,刘淑霞,张乾,等.南白牛厂银多金属矿床喷流沉积成因证据:容矿岩石的地球化学约束.现代地质,2010,01:122-132
    周朝宪.滇东北麒麟厂铅锌矿床成矿金属来源、成矿流体特征和成矿机理研究.矿物岩石地球化学通报,1998,17(1):34-36
    周高明,李本禄.云南毛坪铅锌矿床地质特征及成因初探.西部探矿工程,2005,03:78-80
    周国宝.中国有色金属矿产资源现状和矿业可持续发展的建议.中国金属通报,2005,35:5-8
    周云满.鲁甸乐马厂银矿床地质特征与成矿作用初探.矿床地质,1999,02:25-32
    周云满.滇东北乐红铅锌矿床地质特征及找矿远景.地质地球化学,2003,04:17-22

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700