基于功率从属性追踪的电网节点成本分析
|
摘要
市场下的输电服务基本问题不再是优先解决电力用户的用电需求,而是要明确地定义输电服务、用户使用输电系统的权利以及相应的服务成本,并将其服务平等地提供给任何市场参与者以及科学合理地分摊其成本。论文提出以功率分量费用流守恒原理为输电经济成本分析的经济准则。在电网断面潮流已知的情况下,将功率分量视为费用载体,各负荷节点单位电力成本视为功率分量的费用流在电网中流动的结果。功率分量在节点和元件上的费用流守恒体现了收支平衡的原则和能量传输过程中因损耗引起的经济成本的变化。
论文提出了一种基于功率从属性分析的节点输电成本分析方法,采用功率分量理论作为该方法的物理理论基础;以功率分量费用流守恒原理作为经济原则,根据电网中解耦后的电源功率分布得出了各电源在电网中的各节点的单位电力成本的分析与计算模型;按各电源的节点单位电力成本与各电源在不同节点处的功率比重加权平均得出了电网中任意节点的单位电力成本。在潮流断面和购电节点购电价格已知的情况下,该方法直观的得出了计及网损的负荷节点单位电力成本与电源购电价格的表达式,适用于不同电源不同购电价格的情况下的负荷节点成本分析。同时,论文根据功率分量理论,构建了电网负荷功率从属性追踪模型;结合功率分量费用流守恒原理在断面潮流与负荷节点售电价格已知的情况下,得出了计及网损情况下电源节点购电成本与负荷节点售电价格的解析表达式。
电网等值问题是一个经典的物理问题,但是随着电力工业市场化改革,当物理潮流与电网经济分配结合在一起,其对输电成本分配的影响目前尚未有详细的理论结果。本文基于功率分量理论和费用流守恒原理利用数学等值方法,给出了等值前后内部网络的功率分布特征解析表达式,并得出了等值前后内部网络中节点单位电力成本不变的条件。最后得出结论,在一般情况下电网等值计算会引起内部网络输电成本的变化。
在我国电力市场初期,购电方未进入市场,终端销售电价未放开,同时市场中相当大比例还需要通过长期、中期、短期的合同来完成交易的情况下,上述负荷节点输电成本分析和购电节点成本分析方法有利于市场运营机构分析把握电网中各节点成本盈亏情况。通过对电网等值对输电成本分配的影响的研究,为我国电力市场改革下一步输配分开后的配电网经济成本分析提供了理论基础。
In the power market, the function of transmission service is not only limited in satisfying the user’s the power demand, but also clearly defining transmission service and the user’s right and cost of using transmission system. It requires justice to provide the transmission service to market participant and reasonable locate the transmission cost. This dissertation proposed the power component cost flow conservation principle as the fundamental of transmission cost analysis. At the situation of the power flow and generator’s on-grid price is given, the power component is regard as the carrier of cost, the unit cost of load node is regard as the flowing result of power component cost flow. The conservation of power component cost flow in transmission node and element indicates the income & expenses balance and the cost variety caused by net-loss.
This dissertation presents a node transmission cost analysis method based on the analysis of power dependency. At first, this method adopts the power component theory as the physical theory base of the method to solve the source dependency problem of branch power in electric network at physical view. Next, the analytical and computation module of the source’s unit power cost at network’s each node is gotten by adopting node cost flow conservation principle as economic fundamental. At last, the unit power cost of any node in the network is educed according to each source’s node unit power cost and each source’s power proportion weighted mean at different nodes. This method is clear in physical idea, it can directly conclude the intuitionist expression of each node’s unit power cost in network and source’s purchase price considered net-loss in the situation of the power flow and generator’s on-grid price is given. It suits for the instance of different sources having different purchase price. At also, the load-power source dependency trace model is educed according to power component theory, combined the power component cost flow conservation the relationship considered net-loss between source node power unit purchase cost and load node power sell price consider is gotten at the situation of the power flow and load node sell price is given.
Network equivalence problem is a classical physical problem, but at present there isn’t detail theoretical result of its influence to the distribution of transmission cost when physical flow and network economic distribution are combined together as market development. Whether the transmission and distribution cost of the power network vary or net after the network equivalence is a new problem of power market research. This dissertation gives the equivalent network’s power distribution characteristic analytic expression before or after equivalence, and educes the condition of node unit power cost invariability in the equivalent network before or after equivalence by using power component theory and cost flow conservation principle and using mathematics equivalence method. Finally there is a conclusion that network equivalent compute can lead to the variation of the equivalent network’s transmission cost in general instance.
In initial stage of our country’s power market, the purchaser didn’t enter the market, terminal sell price unloosen, while in sizeable proportion need long-time, middle-time, short-time contract to complete trade in market, above load node transmission cost analysis and purchase node purchase cost analysis method are propitious for market manage organization to analyze and master each node’s cost balance. By the research on the network equivalence’s influence to the distribution of transmission cost distribution, this paper establishs a base to the distribution network economic cost analysis after our country’s power market’s next reformation, that is, transmission and distribution are disjoined.
论文提出了一种基于功率从属性分析的节点输电成本分析方法,采用功率分量理论作为该方法的物理理论基础;以功率分量费用流守恒原理作为经济原则,根据电网中解耦后的电源功率分布得出了各电源在电网中的各节点的单位电力成本的分析与计算模型;按各电源的节点单位电力成本与各电源在不同节点处的功率比重加权平均得出了电网中任意节点的单位电力成本。在潮流断面和购电节点购电价格已知的情况下,该方法直观的得出了计及网损的负荷节点单位电力成本与电源购电价格的表达式,适用于不同电源不同购电价格的情况下的负荷节点成本分析。同时,论文根据功率分量理论,构建了电网负荷功率从属性追踪模型;结合功率分量费用流守恒原理在断面潮流与负荷节点售电价格已知的情况下,得出了计及网损情况下电源节点购电成本与负荷节点售电价格的解析表达式。
电网等值问题是一个经典的物理问题,但是随着电力工业市场化改革,当物理潮流与电网经济分配结合在一起,其对输电成本分配的影响目前尚未有详细的理论结果。本文基于功率分量理论和费用流守恒原理利用数学等值方法,给出了等值前后内部网络的功率分布特征解析表达式,并得出了等值前后内部网络中节点单位电力成本不变的条件。最后得出结论,在一般情况下电网等值计算会引起内部网络输电成本的变化。
在我国电力市场初期,购电方未进入市场,终端销售电价未放开,同时市场中相当大比例还需要通过长期、中期、短期的合同来完成交易的情况下,上述负荷节点输电成本分析和购电节点成本分析方法有利于市场运营机构分析把握电网中各节点成本盈亏情况。通过对电网等值对输电成本分配的影响的研究,为我国电力市场改革下一步输配分开后的配电网经济成本分析提供了理论基础。
In the power market, the function of transmission service is not only limited in satisfying the user’s the power demand, but also clearly defining transmission service and the user’s right and cost of using transmission system. It requires justice to provide the transmission service to market participant and reasonable locate the transmission cost. This dissertation proposed the power component cost flow conservation principle as the fundamental of transmission cost analysis. At the situation of the power flow and generator’s on-grid price is given, the power component is regard as the carrier of cost, the unit cost of load node is regard as the flowing result of power component cost flow. The conservation of power component cost flow in transmission node and element indicates the income & expenses balance and the cost variety caused by net-loss.
This dissertation presents a node transmission cost analysis method based on the analysis of power dependency. At first, this method adopts the power component theory as the physical theory base of the method to solve the source dependency problem of branch power in electric network at physical view. Next, the analytical and computation module of the source’s unit power cost at network’s each node is gotten by adopting node cost flow conservation principle as economic fundamental. At last, the unit power cost of any node in the network is educed according to each source’s node unit power cost and each source’s power proportion weighted mean at different nodes. This method is clear in physical idea, it can directly conclude the intuitionist expression of each node’s unit power cost in network and source’s purchase price considered net-loss in the situation of the power flow and generator’s on-grid price is given. It suits for the instance of different sources having different purchase price. At also, the load-power source dependency trace model is educed according to power component theory, combined the power component cost flow conservation the relationship considered net-loss between source node power unit purchase cost and load node power sell price consider is gotten at the situation of the power flow and load node sell price is given.
Network equivalence problem is a classical physical problem, but at present there isn’t detail theoretical result of its influence to the distribution of transmission cost when physical flow and network economic distribution are combined together as market development. Whether the transmission and distribution cost of the power network vary or net after the network equivalence is a new problem of power market research. This dissertation gives the equivalent network’s power distribution characteristic analytic expression before or after equivalence, and educes the condition of node unit power cost invariability in the equivalent network before or after equivalence by using power component theory and cost flow conservation principle and using mathematics equivalence method. Finally there is a conclusion that network equivalent compute can lead to the variation of the equivalent network’s transmission cost in general instance.
In initial stage of our country’s power market, the purchaser didn’t enter the market, terminal sell price unloosen, while in sizeable proportion need long-time, middle-time, short-time contract to complete trade in market, above load node transmission cost analysis and purchase node purchase cost analysis method are propitious for market manage organization to analyze and master each node’s cost balance. By the research on the network equivalence’s influence to the distribution of transmission cost distribution, this paper establishs a base to the distribution network economic cost analysis after our country’s power market’s next reformation, that is, transmission and distribution are disjoined.
引文
[1] Steven Stoft. Power System Economics. IEEE/Wiley, 2002
[2] Edited by Loi Lei Lai. Power System Restructuring and Deregulation. John Wiley&Sons, 2001
[3] Hugh Rudnick. Chile-Pioneer in deregulation of the electric power sector. IEEEPower Engineering Review. 1994, 14(6): 28~30
[4]于尔铿,韩放,谢开,等.电力市场.北京:中国电力出版社, 1998
[5] Mohammad Shahidehpour. Market Operations in Electric Power Systems. John Wiley&Sons, 2002
[6]王锡凡,王秀丽,陈皓勇.电力市场基础.西安:西安交通大学出版社, 2003
[7]国家电力调度通信中心,编.美国电力市场与调度运行.北京:中国电力出版社, 2002
[8] Happ H H. Cost of wheeling methodologies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9(1): 147~156
[9] Ilic M. Toward regional transmission provision and its pricing in New England. Utility Policy, 1997, 6(3): 245~256
[10]刘洪波,穆钢,刘明,等.电力市场下基于会计学原理的输电费计算方法比较.电力自动化设备, 2005, 25(11): 11-14.
[11] Shirmohammadi D, Gribik P R, Law E T K, et al. Evaluation of transmission network capacity use for wheeling transactions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1989, 4(4): 1405~1413
[12] Shirmohammadi D, Filho X V, Gorenstin B, et al. Some fundamental technical concepts about cost based transmissin pricing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1990, 11(2): 1002~1008
[13] M.E. Baran and V. Banunarayanan. A transaction assessment method for allocation of transaction services. IEEE Transactions on Power Systens, 1999, 14(3): 920–928.
[14] Van Roy P, Van Cranenbroeck T, Blemans R, et al. Practicality of grid quality charge as part of a postage stamp transmission tariff for Belgium. Proceedings of 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000. 1255~1260
[15] Van Roy P, Van Cranenbroeck T, Blemans R, et al. A modified postage stamp transmission trariff considering congestion. Proceedings of 2000 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering, 2000. 47~52
[16] Multale J, Strbac G, Curcic S, et al. Allocation of losses in distribution systems with embedded generation. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2000, 147(1): 7~14
[17] Galiana F D, Conejo J A, Kockar I. Incremental Transmission Loss Allocation UnderPool Dispatch. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2002 , 17(1) :26～331
[18]伍期刚,程浩忠,刘梓洪.边际网损系数法中的网损分摊调整方法[J].电力系统及其自动化学报, 2005, 17(3):78-81.
[19]言茂松,辛洁晴.在电力市场环境下网嵌入的边际成本输电定价新方法.中国电机工程学报, 1998, 18(2):111～116.
[20]付承桂,韩学山,孟祥星等.边际成本定价下的成本补偿[J].山东大学学报(工学版), 2005, 35(1): 42-46
[21]任震,吴国玥 ,黄雯莹.计算和分配输电成本的一种新方法.电力自动化设备[J], 2002, 24(2): 14-15.
[22] Richard D. Tabors. Transmission system management and pricing: New Paradigms and International Comparisons[J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 1994, 9 (1): 206-215
[23] Galiana F D, Conejo J A, Kockar I. Incremental Transmission Loss Allocation Under Pool Dispatch. IEEE Trans on Power Systems. 2002 , 17(1) :26～331
[24]张瑞友,韩水,张近朱,等. PJM节点边际电价计算方法及其应用[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版) , 2005, 26(11):1033-1035.
[25] Ng W Y. Generalized generation distribution factors for power system security evaluations. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1981, PAS-100(3): 1001~1005
[26]刘焕志,李扬,柏瑞,等.区域电力市场中实用网损计算及分摊的研究.电网技术, 2003, 27(3): 71~77
[27]刘梓洪,程浩忠,刘晓东,等.国外典型区域电力市场网损分摊方法.电力系统自动化, 2003, 27(4): 29~32
[28] Buygi M O, Shanechi H M, Balzer G, et al. Network planning in unbundled power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(3): 1379~1387
[29] Sood Y R, Padhy N P, Gupta H O. Deregulated model and locational marginal pricing. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(5-6): 574~582
[30] Rudinck H, Palma R, Fernandez J E. Marginal pricing and supplement cost allocation in transmission open access. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1995, 10(2): 1125~1132
[31] Galiana F D, Conejo A J. Incremental transmission loss allocation under pool dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 17(1): 26~33
[32] Fradi A, Brignone S, Wollenberg B F. Calculation of energy transaction allocation factors. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(2): 266~272
[33] Galiana F D, Phelan M. Allocation of transmission losses to bilateral contracts in a competitive environment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 143~150
[34]王秀丽,甘志,雷兵,等.输电阻塞管理的灵敏度分析模型及算法.电力系统自动化. 2002, 26(4): 10~13
[35] Expósito A G, Riquelme Santos J M, García T G et al.Fair allocation of transmission power losses[J].IEEE Trans PS, 2000, 15(1):184-188
[36]吴政球.非线性函数贡献因子理论及其应用.电力系统自动化, 2000, 24(22): 32~34
[37] Exposito G, Santos J M R, Garcia T G, et al. Fair allocation of transmission power losses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 184~188
[38] Galiana D, Phelan M. Allocation of transmission losses to bilateral contracts in a competitive environment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 143~150
[39] Conejo A J, Galina F D. Z-bus loss allocation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 105~110
[40] Gross G, Tao S. A physical flow based approach to allocating transmission losses in a transmission framework. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(2): 631~737
[41] Yu Zuwei. The proposed CLP method for allocating real power losses of multiple flows. IEEE Engineering Review, 2001, 21(11): 45~47
[42]邹云,李卫东.一类输电网损分摊方法的积分路径相关性简析.电力系统自动化, 2004, 28(9): 22~24
[43]荆朝霞,段献忠,何仰赞.函数值分摊理论及其在电力市场中的应用.中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(2): 9~14
[44] Bialek J. Tracing the flow of electricity. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 1996, 143(4): 313~320
[45] Reta R, Vargas A. Electricity tracing and loss allocation methods based on electric concepts. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2001, 148(6): 518~522
[46] Bialek J. Topological generation and load distribution factors for supplementary charge allocation in transmission open access. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1997, 12(3): 1185~1193
[47] Kirschen D, Allan R N, Strbac G. Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1): 52~60
[48]孙洪波,常宝波,周家启.网损分摊决策.电力系统自动化, 1997, 23(2): 59~62
[49]谢开,等.电力市场中的输电服务(四)-输电费用分配方法.电网技术, 1997, 21(7): 65~68
[50]刘福斌,李扬,陈珩.电力市场中按比例分配原则的证明及其推广.电网技术, 2001, 25(5): 26~29
[51]魏萍,倪以信,吴复立,等.基于图论的输电线路功率组成和发电机与负荷间功率输送关系的快速分析.中国电机工程学报, 2000, 20(6): 21~25
[52] Ward A G, Watson N R, Arnold C P, et al. Inversion of real time spot prices in the direction of real power flow in a transmission line. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(4): 1197~1203
[53] SUNHONGBO,YU D C, ZHENG QIONGLIN. AC power flow tracing in transmission networks [J]. IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000, 3(3): 1 715-1 720
[54]李卫东,孙辉,武亚光.潮流追踪迭代算法.中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(11): 38~42
[55] LI Weidong, SUN Hui. Research on power flow tracing-Part II: Iteration strategy for load flow tracing. Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on Electrical Engineering. 2001. 166~170
[56]王锡凡,郏斌,王秀丽.电力市场过网费的潮流分析基础-输电设备利用份额问题.中国电力, 1998, 31(7): 31~34
[57]彭建春,江辉,成连生.复功率电源的支路功率分量理论.中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(1): 1~5
[58]李卫东,孙辉,武亚光.输电成本计算中损耗分摊原则的研究.中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(1): 85~90
[59]李卫东,孙辉,赵善俊.基于严格数学推导的损耗分摊原则的研究.电力系统自动化, 2001, 25(11): 32~35
[60] LI Weidong, SUN Hui. Research on power flow tracing-Part I: Losses allocation rule. Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on Electrical Engineering. 2001. 161~165
[61] WU F F, NI YIXIN. Power transfer allocation for open access using graph theory [J]. IEEE Trans on Power System, 1997, 12(1): 52-60.
[62]谢开贵,周家启.基于有向通路的潮流跟踪新方法[J].中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(11): 87-91
[63] WEI PING, YUAN BIN, NI YIXIN, et al. Power flow tracing for transmission open access[A]. Proceedings of International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies[C]. London: DRPT, 2000. 476-481
[64]谢开贵,周家启.自环流网络潮流跟踪算法.中国科学(E辑), 2003, 33(1): 76~81
[65] Kirschen D S, Strbac G. Tracing active and reactive power between generators and loads using real and imaginary currents. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(4): 1312~1319
[66]王锡凡,王秀丽.电流追踪问题.中国科学(E辑), 2000, 30(3): 265-270
[67]彭建春,江辉,章建.复功率电源的元件功率分量理论与仿真.中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(2): 11~15
[68]李卫东,魏立明,孙辉,肖宏飞.潮流追踪算法比较研究.大连理工大学学报, 2002, 42(4): 491~497
[69]李志民,潘明惠,杨松岩,陈学允.跟踪潮流的理论研究.中国电力, 2000, 33(11): 41~43
[70]乔振宇,陈学允,张粒子,于尔铿,杨以涵.功率分解潮流计算方法.电机工程学报, 2001, 21(1): 77~79
[71]冯林桥,许文玉,邓昌安,刘飞.共轭电流全损耗功率分量定义及其叠加原理.中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(5): 65~69
[72]冯林桥,许文玉,刘飞.实时网损电量的计算及分摊.中国电机工程学报, 2004, 24(2): 66~70
[73]王秀丽,王锡凡.利用电流的实部与虚部分量进行复功率追踪.电力系统自动化, 2004, 28(3): 10~23
[74]吴晓蓉,谢开贵,周家启.基于电流分解的输电损耗分摊双向追踪方法.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(21): 24~29
[75] Antonio J C, Francisco D G, Ivana K. Z-Bus loss allocation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 105~110
[76] Daniel J S, Salgado R S, Irving M R. Transmission loss allocation through a modified Ybus. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2005, 152(2): 208~214
[77]吴政球.关于网损分摊公平性的思考.电力系统自动化, 2002, 26(17): 24~26
[78]杜正春,夏道止.输电系统网损的合理分摊.电力系统自动化, 2002, 26(4): 18~22
[79]常乃超,郭志忠.网损分摊问题的思考.中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(4): 43~47
[80]刁勤华,林济铿,倪以信,陈寿孙.博弈论及其在电力市场中的应用.电力系统自动化, 2001, 25(1): 19~23
[81]彭建春,江辉.基于两步联盟博弈的输电网损耗分配方法.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(4): 57~63
[82]江辉,彭建春,欧亚平,肖顺良,李朝昀.基于Shapley值的输电网损分配.电力自动化设备, 2003, 23(2): 18~20
[83]胡朝阳,韩祯祥.基于Shapley值的网损分摊新方法.电力系统自动化, 2003, 27(7): 32~35
[84]周兴华,杜松怀.双边交易电力市场下基于核仁理论的网损分摊方法.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(1): 60~65
[85] Einborn M, Siddiqi R. Electricity Transmission Pricing and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996
[86] Schweppe F C, Caramanis M C, Tabors R D, et al. Spot Pricing of Electricity.Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988
[87] Caramanis M C, Bohn R E, Schweppe F C. WARTES: A Tool for Evaluating the Marginal Cost of Wheeling. IEEE Trans. on Power System, 1989, 4(2)
[88] River M, Perez-Ariaga I. Computation and Decomposition of Spot Price for Transmission Pricing. In: 11 PSCC Conference, 1991
[89] Ray D, Alvarado F. Use of an Engineering Model for Economic Analysis in the Electric Utility Industry. Presented at the Advanced Workshop on Regulation and Public Utility Economics. Rutgers University, 1988
[90] Baughman M L, Siddiqi S N. Real Time Pricing of Reactive: Theory and Case Study Results. IEEE Trans on Power System, 1991, 6(1):31-37
[91] Dandachi N, Rawlins M, Alsac O, et al. OPF for Reactive Pricing Studies on the NGC System. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1996, 11(1):45-51
[92] Siddiqi S N, Baughman M L. Reliability Differentiated Pricing of Spinning Reserve. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1995, 10(3):16-22
[93] Zobian A, Ilic M D. Unbundling of Transmission and Ancillary Services. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1): 32-36
[94] Kave R, Wu F F. Security Pricing of Electricity. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1995, 10(3): 52-58
[95] Baughman M L, Siddiqi S N, Zarnikau J W. Advanced Pricing in Electricity Systems. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1):24-29
[96]常宝波,孙洪波,周家启等.新的实时有功无功电价模型和方法.电网技术, 1997, 21(10):7-13
[97]言茂松.电能价值当量分析与分时电价预测.北京.中国电力出版社,1998: 32-37
[98]白晓民,钟金,张毅等.一种水火电系统输电交易分析方法.中国电机工程学报, 1998, 18(3): 32-38
[99]潘敬东,谢开,华科.计及用户响应的实时电价模型及其内点法实现.电力系统自动化, 2005, 29(23): 23-29
[100]潘敬东,谢开.节点边际电价的优化原理.电力系统自动化, 2006, 30(22): 38-42
[101]鲍海,马千.电网线损物理分布机理.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(21): 82~86
[102]穆钢,王华伟,韩学山.基于费用流法的输电网节点电力成本分析[J].中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(12): 36-40
[103]蔡文琴,张思蓉.电网企业购电成本模型研究[J].华中电力,2007,20:37-41.
[104]张思蓉,蔡文琴.电网企业优化购电成本方法研究与实证分析[J].电力技术经济, 2006,18(5): 21-27.
[105]赵庆波,孙岚等.基于拉格朗日松弛法的优化调度系统.电力系统自动化, 2004(18): 76-79
[106]赖菲,翟桥柱.浅谈博弈论在电力市场中的应用,电力系统自动化.2003(12): 25-27
[107]管晓宏,冯汉平等.序优化在电力市场竞标中的应用研究.西安交通大学学报. 2000(2): 72-74
[108] M. Kurth, E. Welfond . Oscillation behavior of the European system in deregulated market.Electrical Engineering. 2001(83): 335-341
[109]谭忠富,张立辉,李晓军等.区域电力市场环境下电网公司的多级购电优化模型分析.电力学报, 2004, 19(4): 273-275
[110] Ping Wei, Yonghe Yan, Yixin Ni. A decentralized approach for optimal wholesale cross2border trade planning using multi2agent technology. IEEE transaction on power systems, Vol. 16, No. 4, November 2001:833～838
[111]吴际舜.电力系统静态安全分析.上海:上海交通大学出版社,1985
[2] Edited by Loi Lei Lai. Power System Restructuring and Deregulation. John Wiley&Sons, 2001
[3] Hugh Rudnick. Chile-Pioneer in deregulation of the electric power sector. IEEEPower Engineering Review. 1994, 14(6): 28~30
[4]于尔铿,韩放,谢开,等.电力市场.北京:中国电力出版社, 1998
[5] Mohammad Shahidehpour. Market Operations in Electric Power Systems. John Wiley&Sons, 2002
[6]王锡凡,王秀丽,陈皓勇.电力市场基础.西安:西安交通大学出版社, 2003
[7]国家电力调度通信中心,编.美国电力市场与调度运行.北京:中国电力出版社, 2002
[8] Happ H H. Cost of wheeling methodologies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1994, 9(1): 147~156
[9] Ilic M. Toward regional transmission provision and its pricing in New England. Utility Policy, 1997, 6(3): 245~256
[10]刘洪波,穆钢,刘明,等.电力市场下基于会计学原理的输电费计算方法比较.电力自动化设备, 2005, 25(11): 11-14.
[11] Shirmohammadi D, Gribik P R, Law E T K, et al. Evaluation of transmission network capacity use for wheeling transactions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1989, 4(4): 1405~1413
[12] Shirmohammadi D, Filho X V, Gorenstin B, et al. Some fundamental technical concepts about cost based transmissin pricing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1990, 11(2): 1002~1008
[13] M.E. Baran and V. Banunarayanan. A transaction assessment method for allocation of transaction services. IEEE Transactions on Power Systens, 1999, 14(3): 920–928.
[14] Van Roy P, Van Cranenbroeck T, Blemans R, et al. Practicality of grid quality charge as part of a postage stamp transmission tariff for Belgium. Proceedings of 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000. 1255~1260
[15] Van Roy P, Van Cranenbroeck T, Blemans R, et al. A modified postage stamp transmission trariff considering congestion. Proceedings of 2000 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering, 2000. 47~52
[16] Multale J, Strbac G, Curcic S, et al. Allocation of losses in distribution systems with embedded generation. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2000, 147(1): 7~14
[17] Galiana F D, Conejo J A, Kockar I. Incremental Transmission Loss Allocation UnderPool Dispatch. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2002 , 17(1) :26～331
[18]伍期刚,程浩忠,刘梓洪.边际网损系数法中的网损分摊调整方法[J].电力系统及其自动化学报, 2005, 17(3):78-81.
[19]言茂松,辛洁晴.在电力市场环境下网嵌入的边际成本输电定价新方法.中国电机工程学报, 1998, 18(2):111～116.
[20]付承桂,韩学山,孟祥星等.边际成本定价下的成本补偿[J].山东大学学报(工学版), 2005, 35(1): 42-46
[21]任震,吴国玥 ,黄雯莹.计算和分配输电成本的一种新方法.电力自动化设备[J], 2002, 24(2): 14-15.
[22] Richard D. Tabors. Transmission system management and pricing: New Paradigms and International Comparisons[J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 1994, 9 (1): 206-215
[23] Galiana F D, Conejo J A, Kockar I. Incremental Transmission Loss Allocation Under Pool Dispatch. IEEE Trans on Power Systems. 2002 , 17(1) :26～331
[24]张瑞友,韩水,张近朱,等. PJM节点边际电价计算方法及其应用[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版) , 2005, 26(11):1033-1035.
[25] Ng W Y. Generalized generation distribution factors for power system security evaluations. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1981, PAS-100(3): 1001~1005
[26]刘焕志,李扬,柏瑞,等.区域电力市场中实用网损计算及分摊的研究.电网技术, 2003, 27(3): 71~77
[27]刘梓洪,程浩忠,刘晓东,等.国外典型区域电力市场网损分摊方法.电力系统自动化, 2003, 27(4): 29~32
[28] Buygi M O, Shanechi H M, Balzer G, et al. Network planning in unbundled power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(3): 1379~1387
[29] Sood Y R, Padhy N P, Gupta H O. Deregulated model and locational marginal pricing. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(5-6): 574~582
[30] Rudinck H, Palma R, Fernandez J E. Marginal pricing and supplement cost allocation in transmission open access. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1995, 10(2): 1125~1132
[31] Galiana F D, Conejo A J. Incremental transmission loss allocation under pool dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 17(1): 26~33
[32] Fradi A, Brignone S, Wollenberg B F. Calculation of energy transaction allocation factors. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(2): 266~272
[33] Galiana F D, Phelan M. Allocation of transmission losses to bilateral contracts in a competitive environment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 143~150
[34]王秀丽,甘志,雷兵,等.输电阻塞管理的灵敏度分析模型及算法.电力系统自动化. 2002, 26(4): 10~13
[35] Expósito A G, Riquelme Santos J M, García T G et al.Fair allocation of transmission power losses[J].IEEE Trans PS, 2000, 15(1):184-188
[36]吴政球.非线性函数贡献因子理论及其应用.电力系统自动化, 2000, 24(22): 32~34
[37] Exposito G, Santos J M R, Garcia T G, et al. Fair allocation of transmission power losses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 184~188
[38] Galiana D, Phelan M. Allocation of transmission losses to bilateral contracts in a competitive environment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 143~150
[39] Conejo A J, Galina F D. Z-bus loss allocation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 105~110
[40] Gross G, Tao S. A physical flow based approach to allocating transmission losses in a transmission framework. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(2): 631~737
[41] Yu Zuwei. The proposed CLP method for allocating real power losses of multiple flows. IEEE Engineering Review, 2001, 21(11): 45~47
[42]邹云,李卫东.一类输电网损分摊方法的积分路径相关性简析.电力系统自动化, 2004, 28(9): 22~24
[43]荆朝霞,段献忠,何仰赞.函数值分摊理论及其在电力市场中的应用.中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(2): 9~14
[44] Bialek J. Tracing the flow of electricity. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 1996, 143(4): 313~320
[45] Reta R, Vargas A. Electricity tracing and loss allocation methods based on electric concepts. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2001, 148(6): 518~522
[46] Bialek J. Topological generation and load distribution factors for supplementary charge allocation in transmission open access. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1997, 12(3): 1185~1193
[47] Kirschen D, Allan R N, Strbac G. Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1): 52~60
[48]孙洪波,常宝波,周家启.网损分摊决策.电力系统自动化, 1997, 23(2): 59~62
[49]谢开,等.电力市场中的输电服务(四)-输电费用分配方法.电网技术, 1997, 21(7): 65~68
[50]刘福斌,李扬,陈珩.电力市场中按比例分配原则的证明及其推广.电网技术, 2001, 25(5): 26~29
[51]魏萍,倪以信,吴复立,等.基于图论的输电线路功率组成和发电机与负荷间功率输送关系的快速分析.中国电机工程学报, 2000, 20(6): 21~25
[52] Ward A G, Watson N R, Arnold C P, et al. Inversion of real time spot prices in the direction of real power flow in a transmission line. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(4): 1197~1203
[53] SUNHONGBO,YU D C, ZHENG QIONGLIN. AC power flow tracing in transmission networks [J]. IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000, 3(3): 1 715-1 720
[54]李卫东,孙辉,武亚光.潮流追踪迭代算法.中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(11): 38~42
[55] LI Weidong, SUN Hui. Research on power flow tracing-Part II: Iteration strategy for load flow tracing. Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on Electrical Engineering. 2001. 166~170
[56]王锡凡,郏斌,王秀丽.电力市场过网费的潮流分析基础-输电设备利用份额问题.中国电力, 1998, 31(7): 31~34
[57]彭建春,江辉,成连生.复功率电源的支路功率分量理论.中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(1): 1~5
[58]李卫东,孙辉,武亚光.输电成本计算中损耗分摊原则的研究.中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(1): 85~90
[59]李卫东,孙辉,赵善俊.基于严格数学推导的损耗分摊原则的研究.电力系统自动化, 2001, 25(11): 32~35
[60] LI Weidong, SUN Hui. Research on power flow tracing-Part I: Losses allocation rule. Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on Electrical Engineering. 2001. 161~165
[61] WU F F, NI YIXIN. Power transfer allocation for open access using graph theory [J]. IEEE Trans on Power System, 1997, 12(1): 52-60.
[62]谢开贵,周家启.基于有向通路的潮流跟踪新方法[J].中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(11): 87-91
[63] WEI PING, YUAN BIN, NI YIXIN, et al. Power flow tracing for transmission open access[A]. Proceedings of International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies[C]. London: DRPT, 2000. 476-481
[64]谢开贵,周家启.自环流网络潮流跟踪算法.中国科学(E辑), 2003, 33(1): 76~81
[65] Kirschen D S, Strbac G. Tracing active and reactive power between generators and loads using real and imaginary currents. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(4): 1312~1319
[66]王锡凡,王秀丽.电流追踪问题.中国科学(E辑), 2000, 30(3): 265-270
[67]彭建春,江辉,章建.复功率电源的元件功率分量理论与仿真.中国电机工程学报, 2001, 21(2): 11~15
[68]李卫东,魏立明,孙辉,肖宏飞.潮流追踪算法比较研究.大连理工大学学报, 2002, 42(4): 491~497
[69]李志民,潘明惠,杨松岩,陈学允.跟踪潮流的理论研究.中国电力, 2000, 33(11): 41~43
[70]乔振宇,陈学允,张粒子,于尔铿,杨以涵.功率分解潮流计算方法.电机工程学报, 2001, 21(1): 77~79
[71]冯林桥,许文玉,邓昌安,刘飞.共轭电流全损耗功率分量定义及其叠加原理.中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(5): 65~69
[72]冯林桥,许文玉,刘飞.实时网损电量的计算及分摊.中国电机工程学报, 2004, 24(2): 66~70
[73]王秀丽,王锡凡.利用电流的实部与虚部分量进行复功率追踪.电力系统自动化, 2004, 28(3): 10~23
[74]吴晓蓉,谢开贵,周家启.基于电流分解的输电损耗分摊双向追踪方法.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(21): 24~29
[75] Antonio J C, Francisco D G, Ivana K. Z-Bus loss allocation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 105~110
[76] Daniel J S, Salgado R S, Irving M R. Transmission loss allocation through a modified Ybus. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2005, 152(2): 208~214
[77]吴政球.关于网损分摊公平性的思考.电力系统自动化, 2002, 26(17): 24~26
[78]杜正春,夏道止.输电系统网损的合理分摊.电力系统自动化, 2002, 26(4): 18~22
[79]常乃超,郭志忠.网损分摊问题的思考.中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(4): 43~47
[80]刁勤华,林济铿,倪以信,陈寿孙.博弈论及其在电力市场中的应用.电力系统自动化, 2001, 25(1): 19~23
[81]彭建春,江辉.基于两步联盟博弈的输电网损耗分配方法.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(4): 57~63
[82]江辉,彭建春,欧亚平,肖顺良,李朝昀.基于Shapley值的输电网损分配.电力自动化设备, 2003, 23(2): 18~20
[83]胡朝阳,韩祯祥.基于Shapley值的网损分摊新方法.电力系统自动化, 2003, 27(7): 32~35
[84]周兴华,杜松怀.双边交易电力市场下基于核仁理论的网损分摊方法.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(1): 60~65
[85] Einborn M, Siddiqi R. Electricity Transmission Pricing and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996
[86] Schweppe F C, Caramanis M C, Tabors R D, et al. Spot Pricing of Electricity.Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988
[87] Caramanis M C, Bohn R E, Schweppe F C. WARTES: A Tool for Evaluating the Marginal Cost of Wheeling. IEEE Trans. on Power System, 1989, 4(2)
[88] River M, Perez-Ariaga I. Computation and Decomposition of Spot Price for Transmission Pricing. In: 11 PSCC Conference, 1991
[89] Ray D, Alvarado F. Use of an Engineering Model for Economic Analysis in the Electric Utility Industry. Presented at the Advanced Workshop on Regulation and Public Utility Economics. Rutgers University, 1988
[90] Baughman M L, Siddiqi S N. Real Time Pricing of Reactive: Theory and Case Study Results. IEEE Trans on Power System, 1991, 6(1):31-37
[91] Dandachi N, Rawlins M, Alsac O, et al. OPF for Reactive Pricing Studies on the NGC System. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1996, 11(1):45-51
[92] Siddiqi S N, Baughman M L. Reliability Differentiated Pricing of Spinning Reserve. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1995, 10(3):16-22
[93] Zobian A, Ilic M D. Unbundling of Transmission and Ancillary Services. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1): 32-36
[94] Kave R, Wu F F. Security Pricing of Electricity. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1995, 10(3): 52-58
[95] Baughman M L, Siddiqi S N, Zarnikau J W. Advanced Pricing in Electricity Systems. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1):24-29
[96]常宝波,孙洪波,周家启等.新的实时有功无功电价模型和方法.电网技术, 1997, 21(10):7-13
[97]言茂松.电能价值当量分析与分时电价预测.北京.中国电力出版社,1998: 32-37
[98]白晓民,钟金,张毅等.一种水火电系统输电交易分析方法.中国电机工程学报, 1998, 18(3): 32-38
[99]潘敬东,谢开,华科.计及用户响应的实时电价模型及其内点法实现.电力系统自动化, 2005, 29(23): 23-29
[100]潘敬东,谢开.节点边际电价的优化原理.电力系统自动化, 2006, 30(22): 38-42
[101]鲍海,马千.电网线损物理分布机理.中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(21): 82~86
[102]穆钢,王华伟,韩学山.基于费用流法的输电网节点电力成本分析[J].中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(12): 36-40
[103]蔡文琴,张思蓉.电网企业购电成本模型研究[J].华中电力,2007,20:37-41.
[104]张思蓉,蔡文琴.电网企业优化购电成本方法研究与实证分析[J].电力技术经济, 2006,18(5): 21-27.
[105]赵庆波,孙岚等.基于拉格朗日松弛法的优化调度系统.电力系统自动化, 2004(18): 76-79
[106]赖菲,翟桥柱.浅谈博弈论在电力市场中的应用,电力系统自动化.2003(12): 25-27
[107]管晓宏,冯汉平等.序优化在电力市场竞标中的应用研究.西安交通大学学报. 2000(2): 72-74
[108] M. Kurth, E. Welfond . Oscillation behavior of the European system in deregulated market.Electrical Engineering. 2001(83): 335-341
[109]谭忠富,张立辉,李晓军等.区域电力市场环境下电网公司的多级购电优化模型分析.电力学报, 2004, 19(4): 273-275
[110] Ping Wei, Yonghe Yan, Yixin Ni. A decentralized approach for optimal wholesale cross2border trade planning using multi2agent technology. IEEE transaction on power systems, Vol. 16, No. 4, November 2001:833～838
[111]吴际舜.电力系统静态安全分析.上海:上海交通大学出版社,1985