用户名: 密码: 验证码:
河北塞罕坝华落叶松人工林生长及生境因子关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究在搜集既有材料及补充调查的基础上,对塞罕坝森林类型,群落结构规律、分布规律进行了分析;分别探讨了塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林林木生长与地形因子、气象因子间的量化关系;探讨了塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林林分密度、林分类型、海拔、坡位等对森林生物多样性的影响以及各因子间的相互作用关系;调查分析了塞罕坝机械林场华北落叶松人工林天然更新的格局规律和影响因素。结果表明:
     塞罕坝是河北省植物种类比较丰富的区域之一。本区系具有典型的北温带属性,具有森林草原过渡性质,中生植物虽然较多,但也具备相当数量的草原耐旱植物。
     塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林生长与地形因子关系研究表明:坡向对华北落叶松人工林的胸径、树高和单株材积总生长有不同程度的影响,坡向对低海拔华北落叶松人工林的胸径和单株材积影响较明显,但对树高的总生长影响作用不显著,阴坡华北落叶松人工林生长要比阳坡好。坡向对高海拔华北落叶松人工林的胸径和单株材积影响不明显,对树高总生长几乎没有影响。密度对胸径、树高和单株材积生长有不同程度影响。对胸径总生长影响较显著,对单株材积的影响主要体现在生长后期。林分越密,林木平均胸径越小,单株材积越小。海拔对落叶松林分的胸径总生长有较大的影响作用,对树高总生长的影响作用相对较小。高海拔林分的胸径总生长量较大。不同海拔对树高总生长量的影响作用不够明显。海拔对单株材积总生长的影响作用较为显著,尤其是阳坡的林分受海拔因子的影响较大。
     塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林生长与气象因子关系研究表明:塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林立木生长与气象因子间有极显著相关关系。对林木树高、直径、材积生长量三方面影响都较大的气象因子是年降水量和年平均气温。对树木树高、直径生长量影响较大的气象因子是当年日照时数和上年11月-当年1月平均地温。关于气象因子对塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林生长量的影响。说明温度和降水是制约塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林林木生长的最关键因素。
     塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林生物多样性研究结果表明:在密度为600~900株/hm~2时,其分分布比较均匀,多样性指数达到最大值。此时林分的郁闭度较小,林下光照条件好,给林下草本提供了适宜的生长环境。这说明密度对华北落叶松林的物种丰富度有一定的影响。对于林分类型而言,在不同林分类型的林分内,混交林中基于多样性指数H的灌木植物的均匀度指数Jsw和基于多样性指数D的均匀度指数Jsi都比纯林的要高,说明混交林中的灌木种分布要比纯林中的灌木的分布均匀。就林分密度而言,当海拔到达1600m时,各指标均达到最大值,当海拔高度继续增加时,各指标又随着海拔高度的增加而呈现减小的趋势。结果还表明,坡位对植物多样性也是有一定的影响,沟谷或下坡位生物多样性指数较坡上位要高。数据分析表明,不同多样性指数间相关性很高,随着多样性指数H的增大,各多样性指数均呈现有极显著相关关系。草本物种均匀度指数Jsw与多样性指数D和基于多样性指数D的均匀度指数Jsi呈现极显著的正相关关系。多样性指数D与基于多样性指数D的均匀度Jsi也呈极显著的正相关关系。
     塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林天然更新研究表明:塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林天然更新较困难,密度是影响天然更新的重要因素。中密度400-550株/hm~2天然更新无论从更新数量还是更新结构都较好,密度越高,天然更新越差,当林分密度达到1100株/hm~2以上时,林内几乎无更新苗木。
Based on the collection of existing materials and the complementary investigations, this research analyzes the forest types, the structural law of the forest community and the distribution law on Saihanba, explors the influence of the stand densities, the stand types, the altitudes and the slope positions of the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba on the forest biodiversity, and their interaction relationship between each factor, studies the quantitative relationship between the tree growth and the geographical factors and the meteorological factors for the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba, and investigates and analyses their pattern rules and influencing factors during their natural regeneration. The result shows:
     Saihanba is one of the areas in which there are relatively rich plant species in Hebei province. This area has the typical attribute of north temperate zone and the properties of transition between forest and grassland. Although it has many mesophytes, it also has considerable amount of drought-resistance grasses.
     The result of research on the biodiversity of the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba shows: at the density of 600~900 trees/hm~2, the stand distribution is relatively uniform. The diversity index reache maximum. In this case the canopy density of the larix stand is relatively small. The light condition of forest understory is good, which provides the undergrowth herbage layer with suitable growing environment. This shows density has a ceitain influece on species richness in the forest of the North China larix. In the case of stand types, in the stands of different stand types, in the mixed forest the evenness index (Jsw) of bush plants based on the diversity index (H) and the evenness index (Jsi) based on the diversity index (D) are both higher than the index in the pure forest, which indicates that the distribution of shrub species in the mixed forest is more even than that in the pure forest. In the case of stand density, when altitude reaches 1600m, all the index reache maximum. When the altitude continues to increase, the index tend to decrease with the increase of altitude. The result also shows that slope position also has a certain influece on plant diversity. The index of plant diversity in gullies or in lower slope positions are higher than that in upper positions. The data analysis shows that the correlation between these different diversity index are very close. With the increase of diversity index (H), the correlation of all the other diversity index is very significant. The relationship between the evenness index of herb species (Jsw) and the diversity index (D) and the evenness index (Jsi) based on the diversity index (D) all present clearly positive correlation. The diversity index (D) and the evenness index (Jsi) based on the diversity index (D) also present clearly positive correlation.
     The research on the relation between the growth of the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba and the geographical factors shows: slope direction has some influece of different degrees on breast diameter, tree height and volume growth per stem of the plantation of the North China larix. The influece of slope direction on breast diameter and volume growth per stem of the plantation of the North China larix at lower altitude is obvious, but the influece on the growth of tree height is not obvious. The growth of the plantation of the North China larix in shady slope is better than that in sunny slope. The influece of slope direction on breast diameter and volume growth per stem of the plantation of the North China larix at high altitude is not obvious. Slope direction has no influece on the growth of tree height. Density has some influece of different degrees on breast diameter, tree height and volume growth per stem. The influece on the growth of breast diameter is great. The influece on the volume growth per stem mainly appears in the late growth stage. The greater the stand density is, the smaller the average breast diameter of trees are, and the smaller the volume per stem is. Altitude has great influence on the growth of breast diameter of larix stand. The influence on the growth of tree hight is relatively small. The amount of growth of breast diameter is relatively great at high altitude. The influence of different altitude on the growth of tree hight is not obvious. Altitude has obvious influence on the volume growth per stem. Especially sunny slope forests are greatly influenced by altitude factors.
     The research on the relation between the growth of the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba and the meteorological factors shows: the growth of standing trees of the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba is closely related with meteorological factors. The relatively important influence of meteorological factors on tree hight, breast diameter and volume increment is annual precipitation and annual mean temperature. Another relatively important influence of meteorological factors on tree high and diameter increment is annual sunshine hours of the current year and mean ground temperature between November of previous year and January of current year. These influences show that annual temperature and precipitation are the most important key factors which restrict the tree growth of the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba.
     The research on natural regeneration of the plantation of the North China larix on Saihanba shows: it is difficult for these plantation to regenerate naturally. Density is the key factor which influences the natural regeneration. Middle density (400-550 trees/hm~2) natural regeneration is better both for the regeneration quantity and for the structural regeneration. The greater the density is, the slower the natural regeneration is. When the stand density is above 1100 trees/hm~2, there is hardly any seedling of natural regeneration in the forest.
引文
[1]蔡晓明.生态系统生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
    [2]曾德慧,姜风岐,范志平,等.生态系统健康与人类可持续发展[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(6):751-756.
    [3]曾志新,罗军,颜立红,等.生物多样性的评价指标和评价标准[J].湖南林业科技,1999,26(2):26-29.
    [4]常国彬,苏宏钧,尤德康,等.森林病虫灾害经济损失计算方法研究[J].中国森林病虫,2004,23(4):1-5.
    [5]刘春延,陆贵巧,陈平,等.华北落叶松、樟子松生长与气候因子的关联度分析[J].河北农业大学学报,2009,32(3):81-84..
    [6]陈高,代力民,姬兰柱,等.森林生态系统健康评估Ⅰ.模式、计算方法和指标体系[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1743-1749.
    [7]陈高,邓红兵,代力民,等.森林生态系统健康评估Ⅱ.案例实践[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(1):1-6.
    [8]陈高,邓红兵,王庆礼,等.森林生态系统健康评估的一般性途径探讨[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(6):995-999.
    [9]陈高,代力民,周莉.受干扰长白山阔叶红松林林分组成及冠层结构特征[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(5):116-120.
    [10]陈利军,刘高焕,冯险峰.遥感在植被净第一性生产力研究中的应用[J].生态学杂志,2002,21(2):53-57.
    [11]陈莉丽,彭道黎.小陇山林区森林生态效益的计量评价[J].森林工程,2005,2l(5):59-62.
    [12]陈灵芝.中国的生物多样性一现状与保护对策[M].北京:科学出版社,1993.
    [13]刘春延,谷建才,李吉跃,等.塞罕坝华北落叶松生长与气候因子的相关分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,32(4):102-105.
    [14]程根伟,石培礼.长江上游森林涵养水源效益及其经济价值评估[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(4):17-20.
    [15]刘春延,聂鸿飞.塞罕坝植物地理成分的分析与研究[J].河北林业科技,200,(5):19-21.
    [16]曹建华,杨秋林,工红英.两种评价森林资源生态环境效益计量方法的比较[J].农村生态环境,2002,18(2):58-61.
    [17]崔宝山,杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系Ⅰ.理论[J].生态学报,2002,22(7):1005-1010
    [18]崔保山,杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康评价Ⅱ.方法与案例[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1231-1239.
    [19]董百莉.长白山红松阔叶林森林昆虫对生态系统健康的影响[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2002.
    [20]杜晓军,姜凤岐,沈慧,等.辽西油松林水土保持效益评价[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2531-2539.
    [21]方精云,刘国华,徐嵩龄.我国森林植被的生物量和净生产量[J].生态学报,1996,16(5):497-510.
    [22]方精云,李意德,朱彪,等.海南岛尖峰岭山地雨林的群落结构、物种多样性以及在世界雨林中的地位[J].生物多样性,2004,12(1):29-43.
    [23]冯宗炜,王效科,吴刚.中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
    [24]冯仲科,罗旭,石丽萍.森林生物量研究的若干问题及完善途径[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(3):25-28.
    [25]傅伯杰,刘世梁,马克明.生态系统综合评价的内容与方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(11):1885-1892.
    [26]高宝嘉,张执中.封山育林对昆虫群落结构及多样性稳定性影响的研究[J].生态学报,1992,12(1):1-15.
    [27]关文忠,韩丹.森林火险等级的模糊综合评判[J].森林工程,2004,20(3):17-19.
    [28]国家林业局.全国主要森林病虫害发生情况统计[M].沈阳:沈阳科技出版社,2003.
    [29]郭晋平,肖扬,张剑英,等.聚类分析法在森林立地分类中的应用[J].林业科学,1994,30(6):513-518.
    [30]郭中伟,李典谟,甘雅玲.森林生态系统生物多样性的遥感评估[J].生态学报,2001,2l(8):1369-1384.
    [31]郭清文,冯仲科,张彦林,等.单木生物量模型误差分析与定权方法探讨[J].中南林业调查规划,2006,25(1):5-9.
    [32]侯元兆.森林环境价值核算[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2002.
    [33]黄和平,杨劫,宋炳煌,等.内蒙古黄土丘陵沟壑区生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(5):1048-1056.
    [34]姜海燕,王秋兵.森林生态系统服务功能价值估算的研究内容及方法[J].辽宁林业科技,2003(5):27-30.
    [35]蒋洪翔,夏国华,刘晋浩,等.伐区集材方式对森林生态干扰的研究[J].东北林业大学学报,1995,23(5):82-86.
    [36]蒋延玲.全球变化的中国北方林生态系统生产力及其生态系统公益[D].北京:中国科学院,2001.
    [37]焦彩霞,孙根年,任志远.渭北高原植被水源涵养功能及价值测评[J].山地学报,2002,20(5):583-588.
    [38]康文星,田大伦.湖南省森林公益效能经济评价Ⅲ森林的净化空气效益[J].中南林学院学报,2002,22(1):7-10.
    [39]课题组编.中国关键地区生物多样性保育的研究(论文汇编)[C].国家自然科学基金“九五”重大项目,1998-2000.
    [40]孔红梅,赵金柱,姬兰柱,等.生态系统健康评价方法初探[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(4):486-490.
    [41]蓝振江.九寨沟陆生植物群落的生物量和生产力研究[D].成都:四川大学,2004.
    [42]刘春延.塞罕坝地区华北落叶松人工林采伐迹地更新树种选择的研究[J].山东林业科技,2008,28(6):28-29.
    [43]李博,杨持,林鹏.生态学[M].北京:高教出版社,2000.
    [44]李迪强,宋延龄.热点地区与GAP分析研究进展[J].生物多样性,2000,8(2):208-214.
    [45]李锋,孙司衡.景观生态学在荒漠化监测与评价中应用的初步研究-以青海沙洲玉地区为例[J].生态学报,2001,21(3):481-485.
    [46]李海涛,杨柳春,严茂超,等.鸡公山自然保护区森林生物量动态模拟及其宏观价值评估[J].资源科学,2005,27(4):154-159.
    [47]李红云,杨吉华,夏江宝,等.济南市南部山区森林涵养水源功能的价值评价[J].水土保持学 报,2004,18(1):89-92.
    [48]李瑾,安树青.生态系统健康评价的研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(6):641-647.
    [49]李晶,任志远.秦巴山区植被涵养水源价值测评研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(4):132-134.
    [50]李铁华,项文化,徐国祯,等.封山育林对林木生长的影响及其生态效益分析[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(5):28-32.
    [51]李银霞.祁连山自然保护区森林生物多样性经济价值评估[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2002.
    [52]李文华,欧阳志云,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能研究[M].北京:气象出版社,2002.
    [53]李向林.草原健康评价的概念和方法[c].中国可持续发展战略论坛论文集,2004,489-495.
    [54]李笑春.生态系统健康评价与可持续发展[J].自然辩证法研究,2002,18(4):62-65.
    [55]李晓秀.北京山区生态系统稳定性评价模型初步研究[J].农村生态环境,2000,16(1):21-25.
    [56]李艳红.寿光市湿地生态系统特征及健康评价研究[D].济南:山东师范大学,2004.
    [57]刘璨,孟庆华,李育明,等.我国天然林保护工程对区域经济与生态效益的影响-以四川省峨边县和盐边县为例[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):428-434.
    [58]刘春江.北京西山地区人工油松、栓皮栎混交林生物量和营养元素循环机理的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1987,9(1):1-9.
    [59]刘建军,王文杰,李春来.生态系统健康研究进展[J].环境科学研究,2002,15(1):41-44.
    [60]刘京涛.桂西南岩溶生态系统健康及其评价研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2003.
    [61]刘其霞,常杰,江波,等.浙江省常绿阔叶生态公益林生物量[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2139-2144.
    [62]刘世荣.森林生物多样性监测评价指标系统构建[A].中国林学会森林生态分会编.森林生态学论坛[C].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999,222-228.
    [63]刘晓石、陈鸿建,何腊梅.概率论与数理统计[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.
    [64]刘兴良,史作民,杨冬生,等.山地植物群落生物多样性与生物生产力海拔梯度变化研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(4):27-34.
    [65]吕郁彪.广西公益林生态效益价值评价[J].南京林业人学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(4):61-64.
    [66]马建华.层次分析法在大气环境质量综合评价中的应用[J].干旱环境监测,1998,12(3):169-174.
    [67]马克明,傅伯杰,周华锋.北京东灵山地区森林的物种多样性和景观格局多样性研究[J].生态学报,1999.19(1):1-7.
    [68]玛宗炜,王效科,吴刚.中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
    [69]刘春延.塞罕坝地区华北落叶松人工林土壤水肥变化规律的研究[J].河北林果研究,2009,24(1):38-40,50.
    [70]彭鸿,陈晓荣,余仲东.刺槐人工林培育实践的认知[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(5):11-15.
    [71]彭涛.华北山前平原村级农田生态系统健康评价方法探讨[D].北京:中国农业大学,2004.
    [72]强蓉蓉,王国祥.老山森林生物多样性及其保护对策[J].资源开发与市场,2005,2l(1):49-52.
    [73]任海,邬建国,彭少麟.生态系统健康的评估[J].热带地理,2000,20(4):310-316.
    [74]石家琛.论森林立地分类若干问题[J].林业科学,1988,24(1):58-62.
    [75]史彦江,姚宇飞.聚类分析在落叶松种和种源选择中的应用研究[J].新疆农业科学,1999,(6):263-265.
    [76]苏宏钧,尤德康,常国彬,等.森林病虫害经济损失评估的原则和理论基础[J].中国森林病虫,2004,23(3):1-4.
    [77]孙立达,朱金兆.水土保持林体系综合效益研究与评价[M],北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995.
    [78]孙建昌,王进,徐联英,等.麻江示范区森林健康现状及健康经营探讨[J].贵州林业科技,2002,30(4):34-38.
    [79]唐守正.多元统计分析立法[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.
    [80]田颖川,郑均宝,李常青,等.转双抗虫基因杂种741毛白杨的研究[J].植物学报,2000,42(3):263-268.
    [81]王百田,王颖,郭江红,等.黄土高原半干旱地区刺槐人工林密度与地上生物量效应[J].中国水土保持科学,2005(9):35-39.
    [82]王春梅,王金达,刘景双,等.东北地区森林资源生态风险评价研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(6):863-886.
    [83]王德艺,李东义,冯学全.暖温带森林生态系统[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003.
    [84]王德艺,蔡万波,李东义,等.雾灵山蒙古栎林生物生产量的研究[J].生态学杂志,1998,17(1):9-15.
    [85]王栋.中国森林火险调查与区划[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
    [86]王明玉,李华,舒立福,等.不同植被类型森林火灾及雷击火自组织临界性[J].生态学报,2004,24(8):1807-1811.
    [87]王婷.嵩山侧柏人工林群落结构、生物量及物种多样性研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2000.
    [88]王效科,冯宗炜.中国森林生态系统中植物固定大气碳的潜力[J].生态学杂志,2000,19(4):72-74.
    [89]王效科,冯宗炜,欧阳志云,等.中国森林生态系统的植物碳储量和碳密度研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(1):13-16.
    [90]吴兆录,党承林.云南普洱地区思茅松林的生物量[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),1992,14(2):128-136.
    [91]肖风劲,欧阳华.生态系统健康及其评价指标和方法[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2):203-209.
    [92]肖风劲,欧阳华,傅伯杰,等.森林生态系统健康评价指标及其在中国的应用[J].地理学报,2003,58(6):803-809.
    [93]肖风劲,欧阳华,牛海山.生态系统健康与相关概念的逻辑关系[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(2):56-59.
    [94]肖寒,欧阳志云,赵景柱,等.森林生态系统服务及其生态经济价值评估初探[J].应用生学报,2000,11(4):481-484.
    [95]肖金香,彭家武,胡松竹,等.庐山林火发生图的研制和火险等级区划[J].江西农业大学学报,2000,22(4):564-570.
    [96]肖文发,韩景军,马娟.美国国家森林健康监测与评价训划及对我国的启示[J].世界林业研究,2001,14(3):67-74.
    [97]肖扬.林木培育[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998.
    [98]谢大洋.森林病虫害发生程度的评价方法[J]:福建林学院学报,2005,25(3):234-237.
    [99]谢高地,鲁春霞,成升魁.全球生态系统服务价值研究进展[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):5-9.
    [100]谢花林,李波,王传胜,等.西部地区农业生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(11): 3028-3036.
    [101]胥彦玲.基于景观生态学的生态系统服务功能评价-以甘肃省为例[D].西安:西北大学,2003.
    [102]徐文婷,吴炳方.遥感用于森林生物多样性监测的进展[J].生态学报,2005,25(5):1199-1204.
    [103]薛达元,包浩生,李文华.长白山自然保护区森林生态系统间接经济价值评估[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(3):247-252.
    [104]薛建辉.森林的功能及综合效益[J].世界林业研究,1992,(2):1-6.
    [105]杨东,杨秀琴.甘肃武都五凤山林区油松人工林的生物量和生产力研究[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,40(1):70-75.
    [106]杨树华.高原湖泊流域生态系统评价指标体系研究[J].云南大学学报,1999,21(2):149-152.
    [107]杨同辉.浙江天童国家森林公园常绿阔叶林生物量研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2005.
    [108]杨学军,姜志林.溧阳地区森林景观的生物多样性评价[J].生态学报,2001,21(4):671-675.
    [109]叶建仁.中国森林病虫害防治现状与展望[J].南京林业大学学报,2000,24(6):1.5.
    [110]易浩若,纪平,覃先林.全国森林火险预报系统的研究与运行[J].林业科学,2004,5(3):203-207.
    [111]尹承陇.祁连山自然保护区生物多样性保护与森林有害生物可持续治理[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(5):33-37.
    [112]尹华军,刘庆.森林生态系统健康诊断研究进展及亚高山针叶林健康诊断的思考[J].科技研究与发展,2003,25(5):56-61.
    [113]于化锋,邹军,赵晓东,等.基于二级Fuzzy综合评判的林木火险等级的划分[J].内蒙古林业科技,2002,1:27-28.
    [114]于志民,王礼先.水源涵养林效益研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
    [115]袁穗波,佘济云,付绍春,等.雪峰山西南支脉丘陵山地森林植物群落类型及结构特征研究[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(4):1-6.
    [116]袁中兴,刘红,陆健健.生态系统健康评价-概念框架与指标选择[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(4):627-629.
    [117]袁兴中,叶林奇.生态系统健康评价的群落学指标[J].环境导报,2001,1:44-47.
    [118]岳金柱,冯仲科.森林火灾扑救风险管理问题的探讨与研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(2):120-126.
    [119]张贵,刘峰,杨志高.基于RS和GIS的广州市森林火险区划研究[J],中南林学院学报,2003,23(4):62-65.
    [120]张建国.森林经营经济效益计量的理论与实践-林业经济学学科体系探索之三[J].林业经问题,1998,(4):39-42.
    [121]张金屯,陈廷贵.关帝山植物群落物种多样性研究:统一多样性和β多样性.山西大学学报(自然科学版),2002,25(2):173-175.
    [122]张可刚,赵翔,邵学强.河流生态系统健康评价研究[J].水资源保护,2005,21(6):11-14.
    [123]章莉,冯倩,江晓清,等.区域复合生态系统的评价[J].山东环境,2000,(1):11.
    [124]张林,罗大祥,邓坤枚,等.广西黄冕林场次生常绿阔叶林生物量及净第一性生产力[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(11):2029-2033.
    [125]张全国,张大勇.生物多样性与生态系统功能:最新的进展与动向[J].生物多样性,2003,11(5):351-363.
    [126]张启.人为活动强度与雾灵山森林公园生态系统健康关系的研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2004.
    [127]张煜星,李锋.森林环境质量评价的指标及方法[J].林业资源管理,1995,(6):4-8.
    [128]赵清山,潘宏阳,赵铁良,等.森林病虫害监测预报方法及应用程序[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,2002.
    [129]赵杰.森林病虫害经济损失评估的基木理论与方法[J].东北林业大学学报,2002,30(2):82-83.
    [130]赵杰,苏宏钧,常国彬,等.森林病虫害灾害经济损失评估指标体系的研究[J].中国森林病虫,2004,23(1):1-5.
    [131]赵敏.中国主要森林生态系统碳储量和碳收支评估[D].北京:中国科学院,2004.
    [132]赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(4):480-491.
    [133]郑华,欧阳志云,王效科,等.不同森林恢复类型对南方红壤侵蚀区土壤质量的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(9):1994-2002.
    [134]郑华,欧阳志云,易自力,等.红壤侵蚀区恢复森林群落物种多样性对土壤生物学特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(4):137-141.
    [135]周冰冰,李忠魁.北京市森林资源价值[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
    [136]朱绍文,张立,孙春林.八达岭林场森林资源价值评估及生态效益经济补偿的初步探讨[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(12):71-74.
    [137]Aamlid D,Torseth K,Venn K et al.Changes of forest health in Norwegian boreal forests during 15 years[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2000,127:103-118.
    [138]Aber J D,Melillo J M.Terrestrial Ecosystems Second Edition[M].San Diego:Harconrt/ Academic Prass,2001.
    [139]Aguilar B J.Applications of ecosystem health for thesnstainability of managed systems in Costa Rica[J].Ecosystem Health,1999,5:36-48.
    [140]Alexander S A,Palmer C J.Forest health monitoring in the United States:First four years[J].Environ Monit Assess,1999,55(2):267-277.
    [141]Allen Eric.Forest health assessment in Canada[J].Ecosystem Health,2001,7:28-34.
    [142]Apllet G H,Hughes R F,Vitousek P M.Ecosystem development on Hawaiian lava flows:biomass and species composition[J].Vegetation Science,1998,9:17-26.
    [143]Batjes N H.Total carbon and nitrogen in the soil of the world[J].European Journal of Soils Science,1996,47:151-163.
    [144]Bertollo P.Assessing ecosystem health in governed landscapers:A framework for developing core indicators[J].EcosystemHealth,1998,(4):33-51.
    [145]Braswell B H,Schimel D S,Linder B.The Response of global terrestrial ecosystems to interannual temperature Variability[J].science,1997,278:870-872.
    [146]Brown M T,Ulgiati.Emergy evaluation of biosphere and natural capital[J].AMBIO,1999,28(6):486-492.
    [147]Brown J H.Mammals on mountainside:elevational patterns of diversity[J].Global Ecology &Biogeography,2001,10:101-109.
    [148]Cairns J,McCormick P V,Niederlehner B R.A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health[J].Hydrobiologia,1993,263(1):1-44.
    [149]Callicott J B.Aldo Leopold' Metaphor Ecosystem Health:New Goal for Environmental Management. Washington DC:Island Press, 1992.
    [150] Cao M K, Woodward F.Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change[J]. Nature, 1998,393:249-252.
    [151] Chalifoux S,Cavayas F,Cray J T.Map-guided approach fox the autom atic detection on Landsat TM images of forest stands damaged by the spruce budworm[J].Photogramm.EngRemote Sens, 1998,64:629-635.
    [152] Clark D A,Brown S,Kicklighter D W,et al.Measuring net primary production in forests Concepts and field methods[J].Ecol Appl,2001,11 (2) :356-370.
    [153] Clar S,Drossel B,Schwabl F.Forest Fires and Other Examples of Self-Organized Criticality[J]. Journal of Physics:Condensed Matter,1996,8:3-24.
    [154] Costanza R,Norton B G,Haskell B D.Ecosystem health:new goals for environmontal management [C].Washington D C:Island Press,1992.
    
    [155] Costanza R,Mageau M.What is a healthy ecosystem?[J].Aquatic Ecology, 1999,33 (1) :105-115.
    [156] Colwell R.Global climate and infections disease:the cholera paradigm[J].Science,1996,274: 2025-2031.
    [157] Fang J Y,Wang G G,Liu G H,et al.Forest biomass of China:an estimation based on the biomass volume relationship[J].Ecological Applications,1998,8:1084-1091.
    [158] Gary G,ittelbach M,Steiner C F,et al.What is the observed relation between species richness and productivity[J].Ecology,2001,82 (9) :2381-2396.
    [159] Goulden M L,Munger J W,Fan S,et al.Exchange of carbon dioxide by a deciduous forest:response to inerannual climate variability[J].Science,1996,271:1576-1578.
    [160] Hargis C D,Bissonette J A ,David J L.The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation[J].Landsc Ecol,1998,13:167-186.
    [161] Harwall M A,Myers V,Yong T,et al.A framework for an ecosystem integrity report cardp[J]. Bioscience,1999,49:543-556.
    
    [162] Haworth L,Brunk C,Jennex D,et al.A dual-perspective model of agroecosystem health:systemfunctions and system goals ( abstract) [J].Journal of Agroecosystem and Environmental Ethics, 1997,10 (2): 127-152.
    [163] Haskell B D,Norton B G,Costanza R.What is ecosystem health and why should we worryabout it [A].Ecosystem health:new goals for environmontal management[C].Washington DC:Island Press, 1992,3-20.
    [164] Hirvonen H.Canada's national ecological framework:an asset to reporting on the health of Canadian forests[J].The Forestry Chronicle,2001,77 (1) :111-115.
    [165] Holling C S.The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems:local surprise and global change[A]. Sustainable Development of the Biosphere[M].Cambridge:University Press, 1986.
    [166] Hooper D U,Vitousek P M.The effect of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes[J].Science,1997,277:1302-1305.
    [167] Houghton R A,Hackler J L.The US carbon budgetxontributions from land use change[J]. Science,1999,285:574-578.
    [168] Hughes R M.Lake and stream indicators for the United States environment program[A]. Ecological Indictors[C].Barking:Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd,1992.
    [169] Huston MBiological diversity :the coexistence of species on changing landscapes[M]. New-York:Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    
    [170] Jerry A, Griffith,Edward A,et al.Landscape Structure Analysis of Kansas at There Scales[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,52:45-61.
    [171]Jorgensen C B,Larsen P S,Rissgard H U.Effects of temperature on the mussel pump[J].Mar Eeol Prog Ser,1990,64:89-97.
    [172]Jouni K.Four Ecosystem Principles for an Industrial Ecosystem[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2001,9:253-259.
    [173]Karin E,Limburg,Carl Folke.The Ecology of Ecosystem Services:Introduction to the Special Issue[J].Ecological Economics,1999,29:179-182.
    [174]Karr JR,Fausch K D,Angermeier P L,et al.Assessing biological integrity in running waters:a method and its rational[M].Champaign:Illinois Natural History Survey,1986.
    [175]Karr J R.Biological monitoring and environmental assessment:a conceptual framework[J].Environmental Management,1987,11:249-256.
    [176]Karr J R.Defining and assessing ecological integrity:beyond water quality[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,1993,12:1521-1531.
    [177]Kevan P G,Greeo C F.Biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystem health:pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry health[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1997,34:1122-1136.
    [178]Kimmins J P.Forest Ecology[M].New Jersey:Prince hall,1996.
    [179]Kolb T E,Wagner M R,Covington W.Conceptg of Forest Health-Vtilitarian and Ecosystem Perspeetiue[J].Journal of Foresty,1994,7:10-15.
    [180]Leopold J C.Getting a handle on ecosystem health[J].Scienee,1997,276-287.
    [181]Luloff A E,Jacob S,Bourke L,et a/.Achieving better forest management through a forest land preservation program:A pennsvlvania DersDective[J].Ecosyst Health,1996,2(1):69-81.
    [182]Lyons J,Gutierrez-Herndndez,E Dfaz-Pardo,et al.Development of a preliminary index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages to assess ecosystem condition in the lakes of central Mexico[J].Hydrobiology,2000,418:57-72.
    [183]Magean W T,Costanza R,Vlanswica R E.The development and initial teseing of quontitatiue assessment of ecosystem health[J].Ecosystem Health,1995,1:201-213.
    [184]Malamud B D,Morein G,Turcotte D L.Forest fires:Anexample of self-organized critical behaviour[J].Science,1998,28:1840-1842.
    [185]Mageau M T,Costanza R,Ulanowicz R E.Quantifying the trends expected in developing ecosystems[J].Ecol Model,1998,112(1):1-115.
    [186]Misra R K,Tumbull C R A,Cromer R N.Below- and:above-ground growth of Eucaly ptusnitens in a young plantation Biomass[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1998,106:283-293.
    [187]Mohan K W,Fatih E,Tristram O,et al.Assess ingterrestrial ecosystem sustainability:Usefulness of regional carbon and nitrogen models[J].Nature & resources,1999,35(4):21-33.
    [188]Naeem,Li S.Consumer species richness and auotrophic biomass[J].Eeology,1998,79:2603-2615.
    [189]O'-Langhlin-J,SamPson R N,Adams D L.Assessing forest health conditions in Idaho withforest inventory data.Assessing Forest Ecosystem Health in the Inland West[M].New York:Food Products Press,1993.
    [190]O'-Laughlin J,Livingston R L,Their R,et al.Def'ming and measuring forest health.AssessingForest Ecosystem Health in the Inland West[M].New York:Food Products Press,I993.
    [191]Page T.Environmental existential ism[A].Ecosystem health:new goals for environmontal m-anagement[C].Washington D C:Island Press,1992,97-123.
    [192]Paul A M.Managing for forest health[J].Journal of Forestry,2002,100(7):24-27.
    [193] Picket S T A,Cadenasson M L.Landscape Ecology:Spatial heterogeneity in ecological syst-ems[J].Science, 1995,269:331-334.
    [194] Piran C L W, Keith G W.Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain:a case studyof the otter Lutra letra and the water vole Arvicola terrestris[J].Bio.Conserva, 1997,82:345-354.
    [195] Quentin P,Jacques R,Jean-Marc O,et al.Aboveground biomass and nutrient content of five Douglas-fir stands in France[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2001,142:109-127.
    [196] Rapport D J,Regier&Hutchison.Ecosystem behavior understress[J].The American Naturalist, 1985, 125:617-640
    
    [197] Rapport DJ.What constitute ecosystem health? [J].Perspect Biol medic, 1989, (33) :120-132.
    [198] Rapport D J,Gandet C L,Calow P.Evaluating and monitoring the health of large scale ecosystem [M].Berlin:Springer verlag, 1994.
    
    [199] Rapport D J.Ecosystem health:Exploring territoyr[J].Ecosystem Health, 1995,1:5-13.
    [200] Rapport D.Costanza R.Epdtein P R.Ecosystem health [M].Oxford:Blackwell Science,1998.
    [201] Rapport D J,Costanza &Mc Michacl.Assessingecosystem health[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1998,13:397-402.
    
    [202] Rapport D J,Costanza R. Assessing ecosystem health[J].Tree, 1998, (13) :397-402.
    [203] Rapport D J,Bohm G,Buckingham D,et al.Ecosystem health:the concept,the ISEH,and the important tasks ahead[J].Ecosystem Health, 1999,5:104-109.
    [204] Rapport D J.Gaining respectability:development of quantitative methods in ecosystem health [J].Ecosystem Health, 1999, (5) :1-2.
    [205] Regens J L,Hodges D GPerspectives on valuing forest ecosystem health[J].Ecosystem Health,1996, (2) :3-4.
    
    [206] Ribe R, M organti R, Hulse D,et al.Amanagement driven investigation of landscape patterns of northern spotted owl nesting territories in the high Cascades of Oregon[J].Landse Ecol,1998,13:1-13.
    [207] Ricotta C,Avena G,MarchettiM.The flaming sandpile:Self-organized criticality and wildfires [J].Ecological Modeling, 1999,119:73-77.
    [208] Rogers S I,Clarke K R, Reynolds J D.The taxonomic distinctness of coastal bottom-dwellingfish communities of the North-east Atlantic[J].J Anim Ecol, 1999,68:769-782.
    [209] Rudolf Nagele.The some evaluate problem of forestry in the inside [J].Allgenmeine Forest Relbuns,1997, (11) :66-72.
    [210] Schaeffer D J,Henricks E E,Kerster H W.Ecosystem health: 1.Measuring ecosystem health[J]. Environmental Management, 1988, (12) :445-455.
    [211] Stone C,N.Coops&D.Culve nor Conceptual development of a eucalypt canopy condition index using high resolution spatial and spectral remote sensing imagery[J].Journal of Sustai-nable Forestrv,2000,11 (4) :23-45.
    [212] Straussfogel.An evolutionary systems approach to policy intervention for achieving ecolog-ically sustainable societies[J].System Practice, 1996,9 (5) :441-468.
    [213] Ulanowicz R E.Ecosystem Health:new goals for environmental management[C].WashingtonD C:IslandPress,1992.
    [214] Waring R H,Schlesinger W H.Forest Ecosystems:Concepts and Management[M].Academic Press,1985.
    [215] Welcomme.A review of a model for qualitativeevaluation of exploitation levels in multispecies fisheries[J].Fisheries Management and Ecology,1999,6:1-19.
    [216]Xu F,Jorgensen&Tao.Ecological indicators for assessing fresh water ecosystem health[J].Ecological Modeling,1999,116:77-106.
    [217]Yazvenko S,Rapport D J.Framework for assessing forest ecosystem health[J].Ecosystem Health,1996,(2):40-51.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700