黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度的经济效益研究
|
摘要
在全球经济不断增长的今天,地理标志已不仅仅是一类知识产权,而且发挥着重要的经济作用,已成为多边或双边贸易谈判的议题。虽然我国地理标志保护起步较晚,但我国对实施地理标志保护采取了积极的取向。鉴于目前在世界范围内对地理标志保护还存在较大的争议,因此,深入研究我国地理标志保护制度实施以来所取得的成果,尤其是经济效益,以便更好地利用地理标志保护的国际规则,保护和促进我国特色产品的发展,无疑具有十分重要的意义。
本文以黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度为研究对象,以茶农和和茶叶企业为突破口,从经济效益的角度,采用规范与实证研究相结合的方法,对黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度进行研究。其主要内容为：
第一章：绪论
对论文总体情况作简要介绍,主要阐述论文的研究背景和意义、研究的目的和对象、研究内容及论文结构、研究方法和研究技术路线以及可能的创新点和不足之处等。
第二章：理论知识概述和文献综述
对地理标志保护相关的基本理论知识和已有的研究成果进行梳理和回顾并作简要述评。
第三章：国内外地理标志保护制度探析
主要介绍国际上与地理标志保护有关的主要国际公约,分析欧盟地理标志保护制度、法国地理标志保护制度、美国、印度以及我国等国家的地理标志保护制度体系。
第四章：黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度经济效益分析框架
本章从黄山茶叶供应链的角度梳理了黄山茶叶生产供给涉及的主要相关利益主体,然后对黄山地理标志茶叶生产供给做出理论假设,构建黄山茶叶地理保护制度经济效益研究的理论与实证分析框架,为进行黄山茶叶生产的企业与茶农行为实证分析提供理论架构。
第五章：样本茶农情况分析
主要应用统计学方法对茶农调查数据进行初步整理和统计分析,给出调查数据的描述性分析结果。
第六章：黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度经济效益的实证分析----以茶农为视角
本章从茶农的角度考察黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度对茶农从事茶叶生产收入的影响。首先对地理标志茶叶生产茶农和普通茶叶生产茶农的生产经济效益进行比较分析,在此基础上,对328户地理标志茶叶生产茶农进行进一步研究,考察影响其地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益的因素。为此,构建茶农地理标志茶叶生产经济效益分析的理论模型,然后采用适宜的计量经济学方法,实证地分析影响茶农地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的主要影响因素。
第七章：企业黄山地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的实证研究
本章主要分析影响企业从事地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的主要因素。为此,首先构建企业地理标志茶叶生产经济效益分析的理论模型,然后采用适宜的计量经济学方法,实证地分析影响企业地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的主要因素。
第八章：黄山茶农地理标志茶叶生产意及其影响因素的二元Logistic模型分析
黄山地理标志茶叶的生产必须以茶农为基础,茶农地理标志茶叶的生产意愿影响着黄山地理标志茶叶产业的发展。本章首先从农户行为理性、农户行为目标的利润最大化方面对茶农地理标志茶叶生产行为进行理论分析,在此基础上,建立二元Logistic模型,研究黄山茶农地理标志茶叶生产的意愿及其影响因素。
第九章：研究结论和对策建议
基于以上统计和计量分析的结果,导出总体结论和对策建议,提出值得进一步研究的问题。
本文的主要研究结论如下：
(1)通过对生产地理标志茶叶和生产普通茶叶的茶农的比较发现,黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度已有效地改善了茶农茶叶生产收入。从比较结果看,资金投入、劳动投入、地理标志对茶农从事茶叶生产的收入都存在有着一定正向的影响,但影响程度不同,其中,地理标志茶叶生产变量达到了极显著水平,由此可见,黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度已有效地改善了茶农茶叶生产收入。
(2)茶农地理标志茶叶生产经济效益除了受资金投入、劳动投入影响之外,还受其他一系列关键因素影响。通过对328户地理标志茶叶生产茶农的研究表明,在茶农家庭自身基本特征方面,茶农家庭平均年龄、平均文化程度和家庭人均茶叶生产面积对茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益有一定的影响,但影响不是很显著。在茶农地理标志茶叶生产特征方面,茶农茶叶生产专用设施的投入、农药肥料的购买方式和病虫害的防治方式以及茶农对农药残留的重视程度、对黄山茶叶地理标志保护的认知水平对茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益产生了显著的影响。而在市场特征方面,茶农是否是通过协议的方式与茶叶企业进行交易、是否知道企业对质量有所要求以及企业对茶农的茶叶生产是否进行技术指导和对茶农提供利润返还对茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益产生了积极的影响。在外部环境特征方面,包括茶农是否加入农民合作社以及政府主要相关部门在茶农地理标志茶叶生产中发挥的作用。由此可见,茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益是多种因素综合作用的结果,且有其内在的规律性。
(3)通过对地理标志茶叶与普通茶叶的产出—投入的比较分析,构建企业地理标志茶叶生产经济比较收益率指标并进行分析。研究表明,企业地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益受到许多因素的影响。在企业自身基本特征方面,企业规模和科技研究人员数量对企业从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益有显著正向影响,但显著性各有不同,且影响程度也不同；在企业地理标志茶叶生产特征方面的影响因素包括质量检测控制体系建设、责任人制度两个变量,并且这个两个变量都达到了极显著水平；在企业市场特征方面,企业产品品牌的知名度存在显著影响,销售市场变量有一定的正向影响,但影响却不显著。在外部环境特征方面,企业基地原料采购比例和政府相关部门发挥作用变量有一定的正向影响,但显著性各有不同,且影响程度也不同。由此可见,企业从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益是多种因素综合作用的结果,且有其内在的规律性。
(4)茶农对地理标志茶叶的生产影响着黄山地理标志茶叶产业的发展。总体而言,茶农未来地理标志茶叶生产的愿望比较强烈,但不同茶农的生产意愿有明显差异,茶农的生产意愿受到许多因素的影响。研究表明,茶农未来地理标志茶叶生产意愿与茶农户主文化程度、专用设施投入、地理标志认识水平、茶叶品质关注以及茶叶农药残留的重视程度等因素呈显著的相关关系,与茶叶销售市场距离、户主年龄、生产经营规模、家庭规模等因素呈一定的正相关关系,与户主的性别、茶叶收入所占家庭总收入比重、地理标志宣传培训活动、政府部门的作用因素关系不显著。由此可见,茶农未来是否愿意生产地理标志茶叶受众多因素的共同影响,有其内在的规律性。
基于上述研究结论,本文提出了若干对策建议：(1)注重培育实施地理标志茶叶的产业龙头企业,打造黄山地理标志茶叶知名品牌；(2)企业要严把质量关,建设完善质量标准体系及保障体系,确保黄山地理标志茶叶的优良品质；(3)积极鼓励企业更新设备,加快技改步伐,确保产品质量的稳定和提高；(4)在抓住国内销售市场的同时积极开拓国际市场；(5)逐步引导茶农适度规模经营,激发茶农专用设施的投入,提高茶农茶叶收入；(6)积极探索更为有效的农企联结机制；(7)加大黄山茶叶地理标志保护的宣传,增强民众的保护意识。
此外,在黄山地理标志茶叶区域公用品牌的使用管理、保护上,政府要有所作为。为此,黄山市各级政府部门应：(1)研究和制定黄山地理标志茶叶产业发展的政策,尤其是在财政投入、公共品牌宣传等方面制定相应的优惠政策和扶持措施,为黄山市地理标志茶叶产业的长远发展,创造了良好的政策环境；(2)强化合作,加大监管和打假维权力度,做好黄山茶叶地理标志申报后的监管工作,规范茶叶市场秩序,保证黄山地理标志茶叶的品质信誉,促进黄山地理标志茶叶产业的健康发展。
In today's ever-growing global economy, geographical indication is not only a kind of intellectual property rights, but also play an important economic role, being the multilateral or bilateral trade negotiations issues. Although our country started rather late in the protection of geographical indication, we took active orientation on the implementation of the protection of geographical indication. There is still big dispute worldwide on the protection of geographical indication, therefore, in order to better use the international rules related to geographical indication, to protect and promote the development of product with Chinese characteristic, further studies on the implementation status of our country's protection institution of geographical indication have undoubtedly very important sense.
This paper make the researches on the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas, with tea farmers and tea enterprises as a breakthrough, from the angle of economic benefits, combining the normative and the empirical research methods. Its main contents are as follows:
Chapter1:The introductory section
This part introduced briefly the overall situation of this paper, explains the research background and meaning, the research object, purpose and the research content and the papers structure, research methods and the technical route and possible innovation points and limitations etc.
Chapter2:The summarization of theoretical knowledge and literature review
Basic theories and the existing research achievements related to geographical indication protection are summarized and reviewed briefly.
Chapter3:Discussions on domestic and international protection institution of geographical indication
It mainly introduces the main international conventions related to the protection of geographical indication, analyzes the protection institution of geographical indication of EU, France, the United States, India, and China.
Chapter4:The analysis framework of economical efficiency of the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas
From the angle of Huangshan teas supply chain This chapter classified the relevant benefit-related suppliers of Huangshan teas production, then list the theoretical assumptions to Huangshan teas production supplies, and build theoretical and empirical analysis framework for economic benefits researches, which is the base to make analysis of the behavior of Huangshan teas farmers and enterprises.
Chapter5:Analysis of the survey with samples of tea farmers
This section mainly uses statistical methods to make preliminary sorting and statistical analysis of survey datas to tea farmers, and show the descriptive analysis results.
Chapter6:Empirical researches on the economical benefits of the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas——from the angle of tea farmers
This chapter studies the influences of the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas on the income of tea farmers. Based on the compare between the economical benefits of the ordinary teas and the geographical indication Huangshan teas, we make further researches on the selected 328 tea farmers of geographical indication Huangshan teas, to work out the economical benefits of producing geographical indication Huangshan teas. Therefore, firstly, set up the theoretical model for the economical benefits of producing geographical indication Huangshan teas, then using the appropriate econometric methods, make analysis of the economical benefits of tea farmers'producing of geographical indication Huangshan teas and the major determinants.
Chapter7:Empirical research on the economical benefits of geographical indication Huangshan teas production of enterprises
This chapter is about the factors influencing the economical benefits of enterprises' production of geographical indication Huangshan teas. Therefore, firstly, the author set up the theoretical model for the economical benefits of enterprises'production of geographical indication Huangshan teas, and then using the appropriate econometric methods; make analysis of the factors influencing the economical benefits of enterprises'production of geographical indication Huangshan teas.
Chapter8:Analysis using binary logistical model on production willingness and its influencing factors of geographical indication Huangshan teas
The production of geographical indication Huangshan teas depend on tea farmers, and the development of the industry of geographical indication Huangshan teas depend on tea farmers'production.willingness. This part makes theoretical analysis on tea farmers' production of geographical indication Huangshan teas from the aspects of farm behavior rationality and their behavior objective of profit maximization. On this basis, it establish binary Logistical model, and make the research on production willingness and its influencing factors of geographical indication Huangshan teas farmers.
Chapter 9:Conclusion, countermeasures and proposals
Based on the above statistical and quantitative analysis results, it draws the overall conclusions and countermeasures, point out the problem worthy of further researching.
In this paper the main conclusions are as follows:
(1) Through comparison between the income tea producing of the ordinary teas and with geographical indication teas, the results show that the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas has effectively improve the income of tea farmers. It also shows that capital investment, labor input and geographical indication positively influence the income, to different extent. Geographical indication, the explanatory variable that we mostly concerned about, has the most significant effect on the income. Thus, the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas has effectively improved the income of local tea farmers.
(2) Apart from capital investment and labor input, a series of other factors affect the economical benefits of tea production. The survey with the production of 328 tea farmers producing geographical indication Huangshan teas show that the following factors have impact on the economical benefits. As for the basic family characteristics of tea farmers, average age of the family, average cultural level, producing area per capital, to a certain extent, affect the economical benefits, but the effect are not significant. As for the production characteristics of tea farmers, input of special facilities for tea producing, buying patterns of fertilizer and pesticide, ways of pest control, tea farmers'value degree to pesticide residue, cognition level to geographical indication,Huangshan teas, all above factors, have significant effects on economical benefits. Market characteristics, whether tea farmers make transactions with tea enterprises by the way of agreement, whether they know enterprises'requirement for quality, whether tea firms provide technological guide and profit refund all have positive effects. For The external environment characteristics, including whether or not tea farmers join the farmer cooperatives and the role relevant government departments has played on producing of geographical indication Huangshan teas. Thus, production economical benefits of geographical indication Huangshan teas is the result of multi-factors, and has its inherent regularity.
(3)Analyze through output - input comparison between the ordinary teas and the geographic indication teas, constructing the economic benefits comparative index of enterprises'production of geographical indication Huangshan teas. Research shows that enterprise geographical indication Huangshan teas production economic benefits is affected by a lot of factors. About the basic characteristics of enterprise itself, enterprise scale and technology researchers geographical have significantly positive effects on the economic benefits of geographical indication teas production, but significance are different; As for the enterprises'production characteristic, the determinants are made up of the quality test and control system construction and system of person in charge, and both the two variables achieved a significant level; about the enterprise market characteristics, the enterprise product brand popularity exists a remarkable effect, and the variable of sales market has a positive effect, but the impact is not significant. As for the external environment characteristics, the proportion of enterprises'base raw material purchasing and function of relevant government department have positive effect, but significance are different, and the influence degree is different either. Therefore, the economical benefits of enterprises' geographical indication teas production is affected by multi-factors, and has its inherent regularity.
(4) Production of geographical indication Huangshan teas affects the development of industry of geographical indication Huangshan teas. In general, the intention to produce geographical indication Huangshan teas is rather intensive, but it differs obviously among the tea farmers. The willingness is significantly correlated with tea farmers'cultural level, special facilities investment, recognition level of geographical indication Huangshan teas, attention to tea quality, and the degree to which pesticide residual is valued. And the willingness is positively correlated with the following factors, distance to tea markets, age of the head of a household, scale of production and operation, size of family etc. but not significantly correlated with gender of household head, ratio of tea income, accounting for the whole family income, propaganda and training activities of geographical indication, and function of related government departments. Thus, the intention to produce geographical indication Huangshan teas is affected by many factors, and has its inherent regularity.
Based on the above research conclusion, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions:(1) stress fostering leading enterprises of tea industry that do business of geographical indication teas, built well-known brands of geographical indication Huangshan teas;(2) enterprise should strictly control tea quality and construct quality standard system and guarantee system to ensure superior quality of geographical indication Huangshan teas; (3) actively encourage enterprises to update equipment, quicken the pace of modification to ensure the stable and better quality;(4) seize the domestic market at the same time actively explore international market; (5) gradually instruct tea farmers to suitable scale operation, stimulate tea farmers to input tea-related special investment facilities, increase tea farmers'income; (6) actively explore more effective agriculture-enterprises benefit coupling mechanism; (7) intensify propaganda of the protection of geographical indication Huangshan teas, enhance the people's awareness of protection.
In addition, the government should make a difference in the use, management and protection of regional public brand of geographical indication Huangshan teas, therefore, Huangshan city government departments at various levels shall (1) provide policy support. study and enact industry development policies of geographical indication Huangshan teas, especially in the financial investment, public brand publicity aspects, work out preferential policies and supportive measures for the sake of the long-term healthy development of tea industry, and creating good policy environment;(2) strengthen cooperation and increase supervision, anti-fakes and rights safeguard dynamics, stressing the supervision of geographic indications Huangshan teas after declaration, regulating the tea market order, ensuring the quality reputation of geographical indication Huangshan teas, promote the healthy development of geographic indication Huangshan teas industry.
本文以黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度为研究对象,以茶农和和茶叶企业为突破口,从经济效益的角度,采用规范与实证研究相结合的方法,对黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度进行研究。其主要内容为：
第一章：绪论
对论文总体情况作简要介绍,主要阐述论文的研究背景和意义、研究的目的和对象、研究内容及论文结构、研究方法和研究技术路线以及可能的创新点和不足之处等。
第二章：理论知识概述和文献综述
对地理标志保护相关的基本理论知识和已有的研究成果进行梳理和回顾并作简要述评。
第三章：国内外地理标志保护制度探析
主要介绍国际上与地理标志保护有关的主要国际公约,分析欧盟地理标志保护制度、法国地理标志保护制度、美国、印度以及我国等国家的地理标志保护制度体系。
第四章：黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度经济效益分析框架
本章从黄山茶叶供应链的角度梳理了黄山茶叶生产供给涉及的主要相关利益主体,然后对黄山地理标志茶叶生产供给做出理论假设,构建黄山茶叶地理保护制度经济效益研究的理论与实证分析框架,为进行黄山茶叶生产的企业与茶农行为实证分析提供理论架构。
第五章：样本茶农情况分析
主要应用统计学方法对茶农调查数据进行初步整理和统计分析,给出调查数据的描述性分析结果。
第六章：黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度经济效益的实证分析----以茶农为视角
本章从茶农的角度考察黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度对茶农从事茶叶生产收入的影响。首先对地理标志茶叶生产茶农和普通茶叶生产茶农的生产经济效益进行比较分析,在此基础上,对328户地理标志茶叶生产茶农进行进一步研究,考察影响其地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益的因素。为此,构建茶农地理标志茶叶生产经济效益分析的理论模型,然后采用适宜的计量经济学方法,实证地分析影响茶农地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的主要影响因素。
第七章：企业黄山地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的实证研究
本章主要分析影响企业从事地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的主要因素。为此,首先构建企业地理标志茶叶生产经济效益分析的理论模型,然后采用适宜的计量经济学方法,实证地分析影响企业地理标志茶叶生产经济效益的主要因素。
第八章：黄山茶农地理标志茶叶生产意及其影响因素的二元Logistic模型分析
黄山地理标志茶叶的生产必须以茶农为基础,茶农地理标志茶叶的生产意愿影响着黄山地理标志茶叶产业的发展。本章首先从农户行为理性、农户行为目标的利润最大化方面对茶农地理标志茶叶生产行为进行理论分析,在此基础上,建立二元Logistic模型,研究黄山茶农地理标志茶叶生产的意愿及其影响因素。
第九章：研究结论和对策建议
基于以上统计和计量分析的结果,导出总体结论和对策建议,提出值得进一步研究的问题。
本文的主要研究结论如下：
(1)通过对生产地理标志茶叶和生产普通茶叶的茶农的比较发现,黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度已有效地改善了茶农茶叶生产收入。从比较结果看,资金投入、劳动投入、地理标志对茶农从事茶叶生产的收入都存在有着一定正向的影响,但影响程度不同,其中,地理标志茶叶生产变量达到了极显著水平,由此可见,黄山茶叶地理标志保护制度已有效地改善了茶农茶叶生产收入。
(2)茶农地理标志茶叶生产经济效益除了受资金投入、劳动投入影响之外,还受其他一系列关键因素影响。通过对328户地理标志茶叶生产茶农的研究表明,在茶农家庭自身基本特征方面,茶农家庭平均年龄、平均文化程度和家庭人均茶叶生产面积对茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益有一定的影响,但影响不是很显著。在茶农地理标志茶叶生产特征方面,茶农茶叶生产专用设施的投入、农药肥料的购买方式和病虫害的防治方式以及茶农对农药残留的重视程度、对黄山茶叶地理标志保护的认知水平对茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益产生了显著的影响。而在市场特征方面,茶农是否是通过协议的方式与茶叶企业进行交易、是否知道企业对质量有所要求以及企业对茶农的茶叶生产是否进行技术指导和对茶农提供利润返还对茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益产生了积极的影响。在外部环境特征方面,包括茶农是否加入农民合作社以及政府主要相关部门在茶农地理标志茶叶生产中发挥的作用。由此可见,茶农从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益是多种因素综合作用的结果,且有其内在的规律性。
(3)通过对地理标志茶叶与普通茶叶的产出—投入的比较分析,构建企业地理标志茶叶生产经济比较收益率指标并进行分析。研究表明,企业地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益受到许多因素的影响。在企业自身基本特征方面,企业规模和科技研究人员数量对企业从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益有显著正向影响,但显著性各有不同,且影响程度也不同；在企业地理标志茶叶生产特征方面的影响因素包括质量检测控制体系建设、责任人制度两个变量,并且这个两个变量都达到了极显著水平；在企业市场特征方面,企业产品品牌的知名度存在显著影响,销售市场变量有一定的正向影响,但影响却不显著。在外部环境特征方面,企业基地原料采购比例和政府相关部门发挥作用变量有一定的正向影响,但显著性各有不同,且影响程度也不同。由此可见,企业从事地理标志茶叶生产的经济效益是多种因素综合作用的结果,且有其内在的规律性。
(4)茶农对地理标志茶叶的生产影响着黄山地理标志茶叶产业的发展。总体而言,茶农未来地理标志茶叶生产的愿望比较强烈,但不同茶农的生产意愿有明显差异,茶农的生产意愿受到许多因素的影响。研究表明,茶农未来地理标志茶叶生产意愿与茶农户主文化程度、专用设施投入、地理标志认识水平、茶叶品质关注以及茶叶农药残留的重视程度等因素呈显著的相关关系,与茶叶销售市场距离、户主年龄、生产经营规模、家庭规模等因素呈一定的正相关关系,与户主的性别、茶叶收入所占家庭总收入比重、地理标志宣传培训活动、政府部门的作用因素关系不显著。由此可见,茶农未来是否愿意生产地理标志茶叶受众多因素的共同影响,有其内在的规律性。
基于上述研究结论,本文提出了若干对策建议：(1)注重培育实施地理标志茶叶的产业龙头企业,打造黄山地理标志茶叶知名品牌；(2)企业要严把质量关,建设完善质量标准体系及保障体系,确保黄山地理标志茶叶的优良品质；(3)积极鼓励企业更新设备,加快技改步伐,确保产品质量的稳定和提高；(4)在抓住国内销售市场的同时积极开拓国际市场；(5)逐步引导茶农适度规模经营,激发茶农专用设施的投入,提高茶农茶叶收入；(6)积极探索更为有效的农企联结机制；(7)加大黄山茶叶地理标志保护的宣传,增强民众的保护意识。
此外,在黄山地理标志茶叶区域公用品牌的使用管理、保护上,政府要有所作为。为此,黄山市各级政府部门应：(1)研究和制定黄山地理标志茶叶产业发展的政策,尤其是在财政投入、公共品牌宣传等方面制定相应的优惠政策和扶持措施,为黄山市地理标志茶叶产业的长远发展,创造了良好的政策环境；(2)强化合作,加大监管和打假维权力度,做好黄山茶叶地理标志申报后的监管工作,规范茶叶市场秩序,保证黄山地理标志茶叶的品质信誉,促进黄山地理标志茶叶产业的健康发展。
In today's ever-growing global economy, geographical indication is not only a kind of intellectual property rights, but also play an important economic role, being the multilateral or bilateral trade negotiations issues. Although our country started rather late in the protection of geographical indication, we took active orientation on the implementation of the protection of geographical indication. There is still big dispute worldwide on the protection of geographical indication, therefore, in order to better use the international rules related to geographical indication, to protect and promote the development of product with Chinese characteristic, further studies on the implementation status of our country's protection institution of geographical indication have undoubtedly very important sense.
This paper make the researches on the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas, with tea farmers and tea enterprises as a breakthrough, from the angle of economic benefits, combining the normative and the empirical research methods. Its main contents are as follows:
Chapter1:The introductory section
This part introduced briefly the overall situation of this paper, explains the research background and meaning, the research object, purpose and the research content and the papers structure, research methods and the technical route and possible innovation points and limitations etc.
Chapter2:The summarization of theoretical knowledge and literature review
Basic theories and the existing research achievements related to geographical indication protection are summarized and reviewed briefly.
Chapter3:Discussions on domestic and international protection institution of geographical indication
It mainly introduces the main international conventions related to the protection of geographical indication, analyzes the protection institution of geographical indication of EU, France, the United States, India, and China.
Chapter4:The analysis framework of economical efficiency of the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas
From the angle of Huangshan teas supply chain This chapter classified the relevant benefit-related suppliers of Huangshan teas production, then list the theoretical assumptions to Huangshan teas production supplies, and build theoretical and empirical analysis framework for economic benefits researches, which is the base to make analysis of the behavior of Huangshan teas farmers and enterprises.
Chapter5:Analysis of the survey with samples of tea farmers
This section mainly uses statistical methods to make preliminary sorting and statistical analysis of survey datas to tea farmers, and show the descriptive analysis results.
Chapter6:Empirical researches on the economical benefits of the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas——from the angle of tea farmers
This chapter studies the influences of the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas on the income of tea farmers. Based on the compare between the economical benefits of the ordinary teas and the geographical indication Huangshan teas, we make further researches on the selected 328 tea farmers of geographical indication Huangshan teas, to work out the economical benefits of producing geographical indication Huangshan teas. Therefore, firstly, set up the theoretical model for the economical benefits of producing geographical indication Huangshan teas, then using the appropriate econometric methods, make analysis of the economical benefits of tea farmers'producing of geographical indication Huangshan teas and the major determinants.
Chapter7:Empirical research on the economical benefits of geographical indication Huangshan teas production of enterprises
This chapter is about the factors influencing the economical benefits of enterprises' production of geographical indication Huangshan teas. Therefore, firstly, the author set up the theoretical model for the economical benefits of enterprises'production of geographical indication Huangshan teas, and then using the appropriate econometric methods; make analysis of the factors influencing the economical benefits of enterprises'production of geographical indication Huangshan teas.
Chapter8:Analysis using binary logistical model on production willingness and its influencing factors of geographical indication Huangshan teas
The production of geographical indication Huangshan teas depend on tea farmers, and the development of the industry of geographical indication Huangshan teas depend on tea farmers'production.willingness. This part makes theoretical analysis on tea farmers' production of geographical indication Huangshan teas from the aspects of farm behavior rationality and their behavior objective of profit maximization. On this basis, it establish binary Logistical model, and make the research on production willingness and its influencing factors of geographical indication Huangshan teas farmers.
Chapter 9:Conclusion, countermeasures and proposals
Based on the above statistical and quantitative analysis results, it draws the overall conclusions and countermeasures, point out the problem worthy of further researching.
In this paper the main conclusions are as follows:
(1) Through comparison between the income tea producing of the ordinary teas and with geographical indication teas, the results show that the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas has effectively improve the income of tea farmers. It also shows that capital investment, labor input and geographical indication positively influence the income, to different extent. Geographical indication, the explanatory variable that we mostly concerned about, has the most significant effect on the income. Thus, the protection institution of geographical indication of Huangshan teas has effectively improved the income of local tea farmers.
(2) Apart from capital investment and labor input, a series of other factors affect the economical benefits of tea production. The survey with the production of 328 tea farmers producing geographical indication Huangshan teas show that the following factors have impact on the economical benefits. As for the basic family characteristics of tea farmers, average age of the family, average cultural level, producing area per capital, to a certain extent, affect the economical benefits, but the effect are not significant. As for the production characteristics of tea farmers, input of special facilities for tea producing, buying patterns of fertilizer and pesticide, ways of pest control, tea farmers'value degree to pesticide residue, cognition level to geographical indication,Huangshan teas, all above factors, have significant effects on economical benefits. Market characteristics, whether tea farmers make transactions with tea enterprises by the way of agreement, whether they know enterprises'requirement for quality, whether tea firms provide technological guide and profit refund all have positive effects. For The external environment characteristics, including whether or not tea farmers join the farmer cooperatives and the role relevant government departments has played on producing of geographical indication Huangshan teas. Thus, production economical benefits of geographical indication Huangshan teas is the result of multi-factors, and has its inherent regularity.
(3)Analyze through output - input comparison between the ordinary teas and the geographic indication teas, constructing the economic benefits comparative index of enterprises'production of geographical indication Huangshan teas. Research shows that enterprise geographical indication Huangshan teas production economic benefits is affected by a lot of factors. About the basic characteristics of enterprise itself, enterprise scale and technology researchers geographical have significantly positive effects on the economic benefits of geographical indication teas production, but significance are different; As for the enterprises'production characteristic, the determinants are made up of the quality test and control system construction and system of person in charge, and both the two variables achieved a significant level; about the enterprise market characteristics, the enterprise product brand popularity exists a remarkable effect, and the variable of sales market has a positive effect, but the impact is not significant. As for the external environment characteristics, the proportion of enterprises'base raw material purchasing and function of relevant government department have positive effect, but significance are different, and the influence degree is different either. Therefore, the economical benefits of enterprises' geographical indication teas production is affected by multi-factors, and has its inherent regularity.
(4) Production of geographical indication Huangshan teas affects the development of industry of geographical indication Huangshan teas. In general, the intention to produce geographical indication Huangshan teas is rather intensive, but it differs obviously among the tea farmers. The willingness is significantly correlated with tea farmers'cultural level, special facilities investment, recognition level of geographical indication Huangshan teas, attention to tea quality, and the degree to which pesticide residual is valued. And the willingness is positively correlated with the following factors, distance to tea markets, age of the head of a household, scale of production and operation, size of family etc. but not significantly correlated with gender of household head, ratio of tea income, accounting for the whole family income, propaganda and training activities of geographical indication, and function of related government departments. Thus, the intention to produce geographical indication Huangshan teas is affected by many factors, and has its inherent regularity.
Based on the above research conclusion, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions:(1) stress fostering leading enterprises of tea industry that do business of geographical indication teas, built well-known brands of geographical indication Huangshan teas;(2) enterprise should strictly control tea quality and construct quality standard system and guarantee system to ensure superior quality of geographical indication Huangshan teas; (3) actively encourage enterprises to update equipment, quicken the pace of modification to ensure the stable and better quality;(4) seize the domestic market at the same time actively explore international market; (5) gradually instruct tea farmers to suitable scale operation, stimulate tea farmers to input tea-related special investment facilities, increase tea farmers'income; (6) actively explore more effective agriculture-enterprises benefit coupling mechanism; (7) intensify propaganda of the protection of geographical indication Huangshan teas, enhance the people's awareness of protection.
In addition, the government should make a difference in the use, management and protection of regional public brand of geographical indication Huangshan teas, therefore, Huangshan city government departments at various levels shall (1) provide policy support. study and enact industry development policies of geographical indication Huangshan teas, especially in the financial investment, public brand publicity aspects, work out preferential policies and supportive measures for the sake of the long-term healthy development of tea industry, and creating good policy environment;(2) strengthen cooperation and increase supervision, anti-fakes and rights safeguard dynamics, stressing the supervision of geographic indications Huangshan teas after declaration, regulating the tea market order, ensuring the quality reputation of geographical indication Huangshan teas, promote the healthy development of geographic indication Huangshan teas industry.
引文
[1]Addor F, Grazioli A.Geographical Indications beyond Wines and Spirits:A Road map for a Better Protection for Geographical Indications in the WTO/Trips Agreement[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2002, Vol.5 (6):865-898.
[2]Anselm K S. Incentives for and Protection of Cultural Expression:Art, Trade and Geographical Indications [J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):81-93.
[3]Audier J.Protection of Geographical Indications in France and Protection of French Geographical Indications in Other Countries [C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications in the Worldwide Context. Hungary:WIPO,1997:241-242.
[4]Barjolle D, Sylvander B. PDO and PGI products:market, supply chains and institutions-Protected Designations of Origin and Protected Geographical Indications in Europe:Regulation or Policy?[R]. European Commission,2000 (a)
[5]Barjolle D, Chappuis JM, Dufour M. Competitive position of some PDO cheeses on their own reference market identification of the key success factors[R].ETHZ:Institute of Agricultural Economics,2000.
[6]Belletti G, Marescotti A.Paths of rural development based on typical products:a comparison between alternative strategies[C]//Fifth IFSA European Symposium Farming and Rural Systems, Research and Extension.Local Identities and Globalisation. Florence,2002.
[7]Bendekgey L, Mead C H.International Protection of Appellations of Origin and Other Geographic Indications[J].The Trademark Rep,1992(82):765-766.
[8]Benson RW.Towards a new treaty for the Protection of Geographical Indications[J].Industrial Property,1978, Vol.4:127.
[9]Berard L, MarchenayP.Local Products and Geographical Indications:Taking Account of Local Knowledge and Biodiversity[J]. International Social Science Journal,2006, Vol.58(187): 109-116.
[10]Beresford L.The protection of geographical indications in the United States of America[C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications. South Africa:WIPO,1999:42.
[11]Bourgoing E. Everything you always wanted to know about geographical indications[R].INTA Bulletin Archives,2003.
[12]Bowen S, Zapata A V.Geographical indications, terroir, and socioeconomic and ecological sustainability:The case of tequila[J] Journal of Rural Studies,2009, Vol.25 (1):108-119.
[13]Bruce A, Roxanne C. Geographical Indications and Property Rights:Protecting Value-Added Agricultural Products [J].lowa Ag Review,2003, Vol.9 (4):3-4.
[14]Bundi M Swiss trade marks practice on misleading geographical indications[J].Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,2008, Vol.3 (4):262-268.
[15]Callois JM. Can quality labels trigger rural development?A microeconomic model with co-operation for the production of a differentiated agricultural good[R]. CESAER,2004.
[16]Carina F. Geographical Indications and Rural Development in the EU[D].Lund:Lund University, 2005:2-3.
[17]Cerkia G.Geographical Indications and Agricultural Products:Investigating their relevance in a South African context[D].Pretoria:University of Pretoria,2006:2-4.
[18]Christophe C, Mai AN. An analysis of the European Communities:Protection of Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs Dispute[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2007, Vol.10 (3-4):171-186.
[19]Claude G, Delphlne MV.Geographical Indications and Biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India:Can Labeling Benefit Producers and the Environment in a Mountain Agroforestry Landscape?[J]. Mountain Research & Development,2007, Vol.27 (3):206-210.
[20]Coase R.The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica,1937(4):86-405.
[21]Conrad A.The protection of geographical indications in the TRIPS agreement[J].The Trademark Reporter,1996 (86):11-44.
[22]Correa C M. Protection of Geographical Indications in CARICOM countries[EB/OL] (2008-02-06) [2010-03-10].http://www.crnm.org/documents/studies/Geographical%20Indications%20-%20.pdf.
[23]Daniele G, Elizabeth B.Defining and Marketing "Local" Foods:Geographical Indications for US Products[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):94-120.
[24]Das K. International Protection of India's Geographical Indications with Special Reference to "Darjeeling" Tea[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2006, Vol.9(5):459-495.
[25]David T欧盟地理标志立法问答[手册]中国一欧盟世界贸易项目EU—China Trade Project,2007.
[26]De S.Protection of geographical indications under the TRIPS Agreement and related work of the World Trade Organization (WTO) [C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical indications.Montevideo:WIPO/GEO/MVD/01/2,2001:4.
[27]Delphine M V.From Plant Variety Definition to Geographical Indication Protection:A Search for the Link Between Basmati Rice and India/Pakistan[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2008, Vol.11 (4):321-344.
[28]Delphine MV.The Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications:From Disengagement in France/Europe to Significant Involvement in India[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):121-147.
[29]Eleanor K M. Pass the Parmesan?What You Need to Know About Geographical Indications and Trademarks[J]. Virginia Lawyer Register,2002, Vol.51 (1):18-23.
[30]Elizabeth B.Translating terroir:the global challenge of French AOC labeling [J].Journal of Rural Studies,2003,19(1):127-38.
[31]EvansGE.The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha:Quo Vadis?[J].Journal of International Economic Law,2006, Vol.9 (3):575-614.
[32]Farley C. Conflicts between U.S. Law and International Treaties Concerning Geographical Indications[J] Whittier Law Review,2000, Vol.22 (1):73-78.
[33]Fondazione Q.socioeconomico dei prodotti DOP e IGP per lo sviluppo delle aree rurali[EB/OL].Quaderno:Qualitativo (1/2003) [2010-04-1] http://.www.qualivita.it.
[34]Fotopoulus C.Quality labels as a marketing advantage:the case of the "PDO Zaragoza "apples in the Greek market [J].Eur J Marketing,2003, Vol.37 (10):1350-1374.
[35]Goldstein P Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines.Cases andMaterials on the Law of Intellectual Property[M].3th ed.Westbury:The Foundation Press,1993:6.
[36]Handler M.The WTO Geographical Indications Dispute [J]. Modern Law Review,2006, Vol.69 (1):70-79.
[37]Harsh VC.Basmati Rice:Geographical Indication or Mis-Indication[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2006, Vol.9 (2):166-188.
[38]Hayes D J.Geographic indications and farmer owned brands:Why do the US and the EU disagree?[J].EuroChoices,2005, Vol.4 (2):28-35.
[39]Heald P J.Trademarks and geographical indications:exploring the contours of the TRIPS Agreement [J].Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,1996 (29):635.
[40]Heath C. The protection of geographical indications [C]//Dolphins Project Work paper 6 meeting: Policy evaluation.Geneva:[s.n.],2002.
[41]Ilbert H.Are Geographical Indications a Valid Property Right?Global Trends and Challenges[J]. Development Policy Review,2009, Vol.27 (5):503-528..
[42]Ilbery B, Kneafsey M.Registering regional speciality food and drink products in the United Kingdom:The case of PDO's and PGI's[J].Area,2000, Vol.32(3):317.
[43]Irene C.Expanding the Protection of Geographical Indications of Origin Under TRIPS:"Old" Debate or "New" Opportunity? [J]. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review,2006, Vol.10 (6):181.
[44]Irina K. European case law and the WTO ruling on conflicts between geographical indications and trademarks[J]ERA-Forum,2009, Volume 10 (2):199-214.
[45]Irina K. Bernard O.Geographical Indications and the TRIPS Agreement:What Protection is Provided to Geographical Indications in WTO Members?[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):275-303.
[46]Jim Chen. A Sober Second Look at Appellations of Origin:How the United States Will Crash France's Wine and Cheese Party [J] Journal of Global Trade,1996 (29):41.
[47]Jeongwook S, Alan M.The impact of geographical indication on the revitalisation of a regional economy:a case study of 'Boseong' green tea [J].Area,2007, Vol.39 (4):518-527.
[48]Joan N.Geographical indications and possible tariff cuts top the Doha agenda [J]. Dairy industries international,2005, Vol.70 (5):14-15.
[49]Jose M.The WTO Trips Agreement The Battle between the Old and the New World over the Protection of Geographical Indications[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2004, Vol.7 (3):287-326.
[50]Josling T.The War on Terroir:Geographical Indications as a TransatlanticTrade Conflict[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,2006, Vol.57 (3):337-363.
[51]Justin M W.Acquiring a European Taste for Geographical Indications[J].Brooklyn Journal of International Law,2008, vol.33 (2):569-595.
[52]JustinH.Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon:The Spirited Debate AboutGeographical Indications[J].Hastings Law Journal,2006, Vol.58 (168):299,311.
[53]Kasturi D.Prospects and Challenges of Geographical Indications in India[J] The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):148-201.
[54]Lackert CW Geographical indications:what does the WTO TRIPs agreement require? [J] Trademark World,1998 (109):22-30.
[55]Landes WM, Posner R A. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law[M].Belknap Press, 2003.
[56]Lasse A. Sondergaard C. A Contrast WithTrade Mark Law:The Permitted Use of Geographical Indications[C]//Trade marks at the limit. U.K:Phillips, Jeremy (ed.),2006:34-50.
[57]Lee J, Rund B. EU-protected geographic indications:An analysis of 603 cases.[EB/OL] (2003-10-1) [2010-03-7] http://www.american.edu/ted/giant/resources.htm.
[58]Lillywhite J, Allison C, Rodriguez G. Regional branding in a global market place[EB/OL] (2007-07-11) [2010-01-5] http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/research/horticulture/CTF21.pdf.
[59]Loureiro M.L, Umberger W.J.A Choice Experiment Model for Beef:What US Consumer Responses Tell Us about Relative Preferences for Food Safety Country-of-origin Labeling and Traceability[J].Food Policy,2007, Vol.32 (4):496-514.
[60]Louis C L.Bacchus in the Hinterlands:A Study of Denominations of Origin in French and American Wine-labelling Laws [J]. The Trademark Rep,1968 (58):145.
[61]Maher M. Invinoveritas? Clarifying the use of geographic references on American wine labels[J]. California Law Review,2001, Vol.89(6):1881-1925.
[62]Marette S, Crespi J M. Cartel Stability and Quality Signalling[R].University of California Davis.
INRA Economie and Thema and Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,1999.
[63]Marsden N T. New rural territories:regulating the differentiated rural space[J] Journal of Rural Studies,1998, Vol.14 (1):107-117.
[64]MarsdenTJ.Food Supply Chain Approaches:Exploring their role in Rural Development[J].Sociologia Ruralis,2000, Vol.40(4):424-438.
[65]Mather C.Geographical indications and the South Africa European Union free trade agreement [J].Area,2001, Vol.33 (3):312-320.
[66]Mccharthy J T, Devitt VC.Protection of geographicdenominations:Domestic and international [J]. The Trademark Reporter,1979, Vol.69 (3):199-288.
[67]Moran W. Rural Space as intellectual property[J].Political Geography,1993, Vol.12(3):263-277.
[68]Murdoch J.T.Quality, Nature, and Embeddedness:Some Theoretical Considerations in the Context of the Food Sector[J] Economic Geography,2000, Vol.76(2):107.
[69]Ortiz H R.Geographical indications in Trips [J] Trademark World,1997 (102):34-37
[70]O'Brien V.Protection of Geographical Indications in the United States of America[C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications in the Worldwide Context, Eger (Hungary):[s.n.],1997:163.
[71]O'Connor B, Irina K. The US Marketing Order System[J].Zeitschrift fur das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht,2004 (3):359-368.
[72]Pinna G.Che cosa bolle davvero in pentola[R].Panorama,2002 (32):47.
[73]Peter M. B.Protection of Geographical Indication in the Wake of TRIPs:Extending United States Laws and the Administration's Proposed Legislation [J]. The Trademark Rep,1994(84):520, 534.
[74]Rangnekar D.Geographical indications:A review of proposals at theTRIPS council:Extending article 23 to products other than wines and Spirits[C]//Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.Geneva UNCTAD/ICTSD.2003 (a):7-8.
[75]Rangnekar D.The Socio-Economics of Geographical Indications:A Review of Empirical Evidence from Europe[C]//Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.Geneva. UNCTAD/ICTSD.2003:3-4.
[76]Rieke JW. Popular feta faces identity crisis[J].Dairy Pipeline,2003, Volume 15 (2):4.
[77]Sarah B.Development from Within?The Potential for Geographical Indications in the Global South[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):231-252.
[78]Satish K, Unnikrishnan V. A case for registration of Dharwad Peda under Geographical Indication Act[J].Indian Food Industry,2006, Vol.25 (6):39-41.
[79]Schwab B.The protection of geographical indications in the European conomic community[J].European Intellectual Property Review,1995, Vol.17 (5):42.
[80]Shapiro C.Consumer Information,Product Quality,and Seller Reputation[J].Bell Journal of Economics,1982, Vol.13 (1):20-35.
[81]Thiedig F, Sylvander B. Welcome to the Club? An Economical Approach to Geographical Indications in theEuropean Union[J].Agrarwirtschaft,2000, Vol.49, (12):428-437.
[82]Tregear A, Kuznesof SPolicy initiatives for regional foods:some insights from consumer research[J].Food Policy,1998, Vol.23 (5):383-394.
[83]Tunisia LS.Gis Protection Under TRIPS Agreement:Uniformity Not Extension[J].Juornal of Patent and Trademark Office Society,2005 (87):221.
[84]U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. U.S.Patent and Trademark Office Internet site, home page andTrademark Electronic Search Systempage.Washington,DC[2010-03-16] http://www.uspto.gov/
[85]VitalF.Protectionof geographical indications:The approach of the European Union[C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications. Somerset West:WIPO,1999:52.
[86]Watal J. Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries[R].The Hague [etc.].KluwerLaw International,2001.
[87]Williams RM. Do geographical indications promote sustainable rural development?-Two UK case studies and implications for New Zealand rural development policy [D].New Zealand:Lincoln University,2007.
[88]WIPO.Geographical indications:Historical background, nature of rights, existing systems for protection and obtaining effective protection in other countries[R].Geneva The Secretariat of the World Intellectual Property Organization,2002.
[89]《辞海》[M].上海辞书出版社,2001：1662.
[90]陈思等.湖北省农产品地理标志产业发展分析[J].农业经济问题,2008(增刊)：141-145.
[91]董炳和.地理标志知识产权制度研究[M].中国政法大学出版社,2005.
[92]戴晶.地理标志保护战略研究[J].法制与社会,2008(10)：9-10.
[93]对外贸易经济合作部国际经贸关系司译.世界贸易组织乌拉圭回合多边贸易谈判结果法律文本,2000.
[94]付启明.新农村建设中的地理标志保护问题研究[J].金卡工程,2009(10)：98-99.
[95]冯寿波.论地理标志的国际法律保护一以TRIPS协议为视角[M].北京大学出版社,2008.
[96]冯星,志红.原产地域产品保护规定的经济学分析[J].集团经济研究,2000(3)：108-109.
[97]傅余.法国原产地名称保护制度及借鉴[J].安徽农业科学,2008(16)：6966-6968,6972.
[98]郭红生,赖秀林.地理标志农产品品牌的事件营销策[J].中国市场,2007(52)：95-96.
[99]郭红生.地理标志农产品品牌的水平营销策略[J].商业研究,2009(1)：184-187.
[100]郭红生,胡淑琴.生态型地理标志农产品品牌关系的构建[J].价值工程,2009(6)：86-89.
[101]郭福金.实施地理标志产品保护推进地方区域经济发展[EB/OL]中国质量新闻网(2006-6-30[2010-2-18]. http://www.cqn.com.cn/.
[102]国家工商行政管理局商标局编.中华人民共和国商标法律法规汇编[M].中国法制出版,1995.
[103]郭志刚.社会统计分析方法——SPSS软件应用[M].中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[104]高敏.地理标志注册是兴晋富农的一个有效途径[J].山西农业,2006(8)：32-33.
[105]胡豹等.影响农户农业结构调整决策行为的因素分析—基于浙江省农户的实证[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(2)：50-56.
[106]赫伯特·A·西蒙.管理决策新科学[M].中国社会科学出版社,1982.
[107]黄文华,林燕金.农业标准化实施中农户行为实证分析——基于茶农采标行为的研究[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版)2008(4)：67-70.
[108]姜含春,赵红鹰.我国茶叶地理标志特性及品牌战略研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2009(8)：58-63.
[109]蒋天才.运用地理标志保护制度促进我省农特经济发展[J].贵州论坛2009(1)：48-49.
[110]孔祥俊.WTO知识产权协定及其国内法实用[M].法律出版社,2002.
[111]孔祥军等.提高我国地理标志产品经济效益的对策和思考[J].经济研究导刊2008(1)：10.
[112]李博.浅谈企业的概念[J].法制与社会,2010(3)：286-287.
[113]刘承芳等.农户农业生产性投资影响因素研究[J].中国农村观察,2002(4)：34-42.
[114]林东华.基于产业集群的农产品地理标志管理——以天宝香蕉为例[J].福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(4)：45-50.
[115]李东生.运用农产品商标和地理标志促进农民增收[J].中国工商管理研究,2005(2)：4-7.
[116]刘福刚.保护和发展地理标志是壮大县域经济的重要课题[EB/OL]山西新闻网：山西经济日报(2008-11-120[2010.-2-14]. http://www.daynews.com.cn/sxjjrb/baban/654975.html
[117]林海.农民经济行为的特点及决策机制分析[J].理论导刊,2004(3)：28-30.
[118]龙文懋 知识产权法哲学初论[M].人民出版社,2003：13.
[119]陆仙等.地理标志促农增收[J].中华商标,2008(9)：38-40.
[120]刘义程.加强地理标志保护促进贵州农业经济发展[J].贵州社会主义学院,2005(3)：57-59
[121]林毅夫.小农与经济理性[J].中国农村观察,1988(3)：31-33.
[122]李永明.论原产地名称的法律保护[J].中国法学,1994(3)：65-72.
[123]刘振铎.现代汉语辞海网[M].延边教育出版社,2001：1169.
[124]李祖明.地理标志的保护与管理[M].知识产权出版社,2009.
[125]南方报业网.去年粤农产品涨价10.7%/农民人均增收98元[EB/OL].网易新闻中心,(2005-04-25) [2010-2-3]. http://news.163.com.
[126]]恰亚诺夫,萧正洪译农民经济组织[M].北京：中央编详出版社,1996.
[127]邱兴平.历史与现实的思考——农户经济学[J].中国经济评论,2004(9)：59-62.
[128]史清华.农户经济增长与发展趋势、影响因素及其对策[J].农业经济问题,2000(11)：51-53.
[129]司智陟.地理标志保护制度的构建与农产品品牌发展[J].中国食物与营养,2007(4)：7-10.
[130]吴彬.中国农产品地理标志保护中存在的问题及原因[J].世界农业,2008(3)：24-26.
[131]王芳等.农户实施农业标准化生产行为的理论和实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2007(12)：75-79.
[132]王莲峰.制定我国地理标志保护法的构想[J].法学,2005(5)：69-74
[133]王莲峰.地理标志保护模式之争与我国的立法选择[J].华东政法学院学报,2006(6)：44-53.
[134]王济川,郭志刚.logistic回归模型——方法与应用[M].高等教育出版社,2001.
[135]王肃.农产品竞争力与地理标志制度[J].现代商业,2008(33)：172-173.
[136]王肃.集体专有与个体共有地理标志制度的权利配置[J].现代商业化,2009(2)：293-294.
[137]王文,方维亮.特色农产品地理标志保护与安徽农业[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006(6)：24-27.
[138]王笑冰.地理标志的经济分析[J].学术论坛,2005(5)：20-26.
[139]王笑冰.法国对地理标志的法律保护[J].电子知识产权,2006(40：16-21.
[140]王笑冰.印度对地理标志的保护[J].中华商标,2004(4)：4244.
[141]王志本.地理标志保护的国际格局、争端案例及我国取向[J].知识产权,2005(2)：33-35.
[142]王志本.实施地理标志保护促进中国东北大豆产业发展[J].中国农村经济,2006(12)：25-31.
[143]王志本.我国传统名特优农产品的地理标志保护[J].农业经济问题,2005(4)：54-57.
[144]谢冬伟.我国地理标志保护制度的历史与发展[J].工商行政管理,2003(11)：2.
[145]西奥多.W.舒尔茨著.梁小民译.改造传统农业[M].北京：商务印书馆,1987：3.
[146]徐薇.农业产业化与农户生产行为[J].天府新论,1998(1)：43-47.
[147]许欣,邱实.经营运作地理标志提升农产品出口竞争力[J].农业经济,2006(7)：71-72.
[148]杨克涛.地理标志保护与区域经济发展[J].合作经济与科技,2009(1)：12-13.
[149]严瑞珍.现代化进程中的农业资源转移与农民权益保护[J].浙江师范大学学报,2005(2)：30-31.
[150]杨万江.安全农产品生产经济效益研究——基于农户及其关联企业的实证分析[D].浙江大学,2006.
[151]袁园,盛松华.保护农产品地理标志的经济合理性分析[J].世界农业,2009(2)：64—66.
[152]张敦兰.浅析地理标志保护对我国农业经济发展的意义[J].河北农业科学,2008(5)：108-109,112.
[153]郑成思.世界贸易组织与贸易有关的知识产权协议[M].中国人民大学出版社,1996：176.
[154]赵东艳.地理标志保护的方式及在我国农业经济发展中的作用[J].科技成果纵横,2007(1)25-26.
[155]古辉斌.消费者对地理标志产品的认知程度以及购买意愿研究[J].消费经济,2010(04)：55-57.
[156]古辉斌.消费者对黄山地理标志茶叶认知及购买行为的计量经济分析[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2011(02)
[157]中国科学技术交流中心.法国原产地名称保护制度及借鉴[EB/OL].[2010-1-27]http://www.cstec.org.cn/about/kanwu_detail_show.aspx?sid=17.
[158]张汉林编著.智慧财产的卫十——知识产权国际保护的比较研究[M].中国经济出版社,1997.
[159]中华人民共和国国家知识产权局.我国地理标志产品保护制度10年发展之路全扫[EB/O (2009-10-27) [2010.1-27].http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/mtjj/2009/200910/t20091027_478854.html.
[160]中华人民共和国国家知识产权局.地理标志保护的法律模式[EB/OL].(2006-5-27) [2010-1-27]http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/dtxx/gw/2006/200804/t20080401_353190.html2006-04-13.
[161]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局令第78号《地理标志产品保护规定》
[162]曾洁.地理标志保护的经济学分析[J].求索,2008(9)：140-142.
[163]郑立.企业法通论[M].中国人民大学出版社,1993.
[164]张龙,陈永红.地理标志产品与地区经济发展[J].中国食物与营养,2008(2)：16-18.
[165]张仁辉.论国际法中的地理标志权[EB/OL].中国地理标志产品保护网,(2006-4-25)[2010-1-23].http://www.chinapgi.org/SiteNewView.asp?ID=824&SortID=49.
[166]张瑞祥.行业组织在地理标志保护中的作用[J].科技风,2008(04)：68.
[167]章胜勇,李崇光.运用地理标志提升农产品市场竞争力[J].农业经济,2007(9)：P80-81.
[168]张晓凤等.农户安全农产品供给的影响因素分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010(14)：7591-7594.
[169]赵小平.地理标志的法律保护研究[M].法律出版社,2007.
[170]张西涛.中请地理标志对农产品经济效益的影响分析[D].南京农业大学,2007.
[2]Anselm K S. Incentives for and Protection of Cultural Expression:Art, Trade and Geographical Indications [J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):81-93.
[3]Audier J.Protection of Geographical Indications in France and Protection of French Geographical Indications in Other Countries [C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications in the Worldwide Context. Hungary:WIPO,1997:241-242.
[4]Barjolle D, Sylvander B. PDO and PGI products:market, supply chains and institutions-Protected Designations of Origin and Protected Geographical Indications in Europe:Regulation or Policy?[R]. European Commission,2000 (a)
[5]Barjolle D, Chappuis JM, Dufour M. Competitive position of some PDO cheeses on their own reference market identification of the key success factors[R].ETHZ:Institute of Agricultural Economics,2000.
[6]Belletti G, Marescotti A.Paths of rural development based on typical products:a comparison between alternative strategies[C]//Fifth IFSA European Symposium Farming and Rural Systems, Research and Extension.Local Identities and Globalisation. Florence,2002.
[7]Bendekgey L, Mead C H.International Protection of Appellations of Origin and Other Geographic Indications[J].The Trademark Rep,1992(82):765-766.
[8]Benson RW.Towards a new treaty for the Protection of Geographical Indications[J].Industrial Property,1978, Vol.4:127.
[9]Berard L, MarchenayP.Local Products and Geographical Indications:Taking Account of Local Knowledge and Biodiversity[J]. International Social Science Journal,2006, Vol.58(187): 109-116.
[10]Beresford L.The protection of geographical indications in the United States of America[C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications. South Africa:WIPO,1999:42.
[11]Bourgoing E. Everything you always wanted to know about geographical indications[R].INTA Bulletin Archives,2003.
[12]Bowen S, Zapata A V.Geographical indications, terroir, and socioeconomic and ecological sustainability:The case of tequila[J] Journal of Rural Studies,2009, Vol.25 (1):108-119.
[13]Bruce A, Roxanne C. Geographical Indications and Property Rights:Protecting Value-Added Agricultural Products [J].lowa Ag Review,2003, Vol.9 (4):3-4.
[14]Bundi M Swiss trade marks practice on misleading geographical indications[J].Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,2008, Vol.3 (4):262-268.
[15]Callois JM. Can quality labels trigger rural development?A microeconomic model with co-operation for the production of a differentiated agricultural good[R]. CESAER,2004.
[16]Carina F. Geographical Indications and Rural Development in the EU[D].Lund:Lund University, 2005:2-3.
[17]Cerkia G.Geographical Indications and Agricultural Products:Investigating their relevance in a South African context[D].Pretoria:University of Pretoria,2006:2-4.
[18]Christophe C, Mai AN. An analysis of the European Communities:Protection of Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs Dispute[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2007, Vol.10 (3-4):171-186.
[19]Claude G, Delphlne MV.Geographical Indications and Biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India:Can Labeling Benefit Producers and the Environment in a Mountain Agroforestry Landscape?[J]. Mountain Research & Development,2007, Vol.27 (3):206-210.
[20]Coase R.The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica,1937(4):86-405.
[21]Conrad A.The protection of geographical indications in the TRIPS agreement[J].The Trademark Reporter,1996 (86):11-44.
[22]Correa C M. Protection of Geographical Indications in CARICOM countries[EB/OL] (2008-02-06) [2010-03-10].http://www.crnm.org/documents/studies/Geographical%20Indications%20-%20.pdf.
[23]Daniele G, Elizabeth B.Defining and Marketing "Local" Foods:Geographical Indications for US Products[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):94-120.
[24]Das K. International Protection of India's Geographical Indications with Special Reference to "Darjeeling" Tea[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2006, Vol.9(5):459-495.
[25]David T欧盟地理标志立法问答[手册]中国一欧盟世界贸易项目EU—China Trade Project,2007.
[26]De S.Protection of geographical indications under the TRIPS Agreement and related work of the World Trade Organization (WTO) [C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical indications.Montevideo:WIPO/GEO/MVD/01/2,2001:4.
[27]Delphine M V.From Plant Variety Definition to Geographical Indication Protection:A Search for the Link Between Basmati Rice and India/Pakistan[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2008, Vol.11 (4):321-344.
[28]Delphine MV.The Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications:From Disengagement in France/Europe to Significant Involvement in India[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):121-147.
[29]Eleanor K M. Pass the Parmesan?What You Need to Know About Geographical Indications and Trademarks[J]. Virginia Lawyer Register,2002, Vol.51 (1):18-23.
[30]Elizabeth B.Translating terroir:the global challenge of French AOC labeling [J].Journal of Rural Studies,2003,19(1):127-38.
[31]EvansGE.The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha:Quo Vadis?[J].Journal of International Economic Law,2006, Vol.9 (3):575-614.
[32]Farley C. Conflicts between U.S. Law and International Treaties Concerning Geographical Indications[J] Whittier Law Review,2000, Vol.22 (1):73-78.
[33]Fondazione Q.socioeconomico dei prodotti DOP e IGP per lo sviluppo delle aree rurali[EB/OL].Quaderno:Qualitativo (1/2003) [2010-04-1] http://.www.qualivita.it.
[34]Fotopoulus C.Quality labels as a marketing advantage:the case of the "PDO Zaragoza "apples in the Greek market [J].Eur J Marketing,2003, Vol.37 (10):1350-1374.
[35]Goldstein P Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines.Cases andMaterials on the Law of Intellectual Property[M].3th ed.Westbury:The Foundation Press,1993:6.
[36]Handler M.The WTO Geographical Indications Dispute [J]. Modern Law Review,2006, Vol.69 (1):70-79.
[37]Harsh VC.Basmati Rice:Geographical Indication or Mis-Indication[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2006, Vol.9 (2):166-188.
[38]Hayes D J.Geographic indications and farmer owned brands:Why do the US and the EU disagree?[J].EuroChoices,2005, Vol.4 (2):28-35.
[39]Heald P J.Trademarks and geographical indications:exploring the contours of the TRIPS Agreement [J].Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,1996 (29):635.
[40]Heath C. The protection of geographical indications [C]//Dolphins Project Work paper 6 meeting: Policy evaluation.Geneva:[s.n.],2002.
[41]Ilbert H.Are Geographical Indications a Valid Property Right?Global Trends and Challenges[J]. Development Policy Review,2009, Vol.27 (5):503-528..
[42]Ilbery B, Kneafsey M.Registering regional speciality food and drink products in the United Kingdom:The case of PDO's and PGI's[J].Area,2000, Vol.32(3):317.
[43]Irene C.Expanding the Protection of Geographical Indications of Origin Under TRIPS:"Old" Debate or "New" Opportunity? [J]. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review,2006, Vol.10 (6):181.
[44]Irina K. European case law and the WTO ruling on conflicts between geographical indications and trademarks[J]ERA-Forum,2009, Volume 10 (2):199-214.
[45]Irina K. Bernard O.Geographical Indications and the TRIPS Agreement:What Protection is Provided to Geographical Indications in WTO Members?[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):275-303.
[46]Jim Chen. A Sober Second Look at Appellations of Origin:How the United States Will Crash France's Wine and Cheese Party [J] Journal of Global Trade,1996 (29):41.
[47]Jeongwook S, Alan M.The impact of geographical indication on the revitalisation of a regional economy:a case study of 'Boseong' green tea [J].Area,2007, Vol.39 (4):518-527.
[48]Joan N.Geographical indications and possible tariff cuts top the Doha agenda [J]. Dairy industries international,2005, Vol.70 (5):14-15.
[49]Jose M.The WTO Trips Agreement The Battle between the Old and the New World over the Protection of Geographical Indications[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2004, Vol.7 (3):287-326.
[50]Josling T.The War on Terroir:Geographical Indications as a TransatlanticTrade Conflict[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,2006, Vol.57 (3):337-363.
[51]Justin M W.Acquiring a European Taste for Geographical Indications[J].Brooklyn Journal of International Law,2008, vol.33 (2):569-595.
[52]JustinH.Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon:The Spirited Debate AboutGeographical Indications[J].Hastings Law Journal,2006, Vol.58 (168):299,311.
[53]Kasturi D.Prospects and Challenges of Geographical Indications in India[J] The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):148-201.
[54]Lackert CW Geographical indications:what does the WTO TRIPs agreement require? [J] Trademark World,1998 (109):22-30.
[55]Landes WM, Posner R A. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law[M].Belknap Press, 2003.
[56]Lasse A. Sondergaard C. A Contrast WithTrade Mark Law:The Permitted Use of Geographical Indications[C]//Trade marks at the limit. U.K:Phillips, Jeremy (ed.),2006:34-50.
[57]Lee J, Rund B. EU-protected geographic indications:An analysis of 603 cases.[EB/OL] (2003-10-1) [2010-03-7] http://www.american.edu/ted/giant/resources.htm.
[58]Lillywhite J, Allison C, Rodriguez G. Regional branding in a global market place[EB/OL] (2007-07-11) [2010-01-5] http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/research/horticulture/CTF21.pdf.
[59]Loureiro M.L, Umberger W.J.A Choice Experiment Model for Beef:What US Consumer Responses Tell Us about Relative Preferences for Food Safety Country-of-origin Labeling and Traceability[J].Food Policy,2007, Vol.32 (4):496-514.
[60]Louis C L.Bacchus in the Hinterlands:A Study of Denominations of Origin in French and American Wine-labelling Laws [J]. The Trademark Rep,1968 (58):145.
[61]Maher M. Invinoveritas? Clarifying the use of geographic references on American wine labels[J]. California Law Review,2001, Vol.89(6):1881-1925.
[62]Marette S, Crespi J M. Cartel Stability and Quality Signalling[R].University of California Davis.
INRA Economie and Thema and Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,1999.
[63]Marsden N T. New rural territories:regulating the differentiated rural space[J] Journal of Rural Studies,1998, Vol.14 (1):107-117.
[64]MarsdenTJ.Food Supply Chain Approaches:Exploring their role in Rural Development[J].Sociologia Ruralis,2000, Vol.40(4):424-438.
[65]Mather C.Geographical indications and the South Africa European Union free trade agreement [J].Area,2001, Vol.33 (3):312-320.
[66]Mccharthy J T, Devitt VC.Protection of geographicdenominations:Domestic and international [J]. The Trademark Reporter,1979, Vol.69 (3):199-288.
[67]Moran W. Rural Space as intellectual property[J].Political Geography,1993, Vol.12(3):263-277.
[68]Murdoch J.T.Quality, Nature, and Embeddedness:Some Theoretical Considerations in the Context of the Food Sector[J] Economic Geography,2000, Vol.76(2):107.
[69]Ortiz H R.Geographical indications in Trips [J] Trademark World,1997 (102):34-37
[70]O'Brien V.Protection of Geographical Indications in the United States of America[C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications in the Worldwide Context, Eger (Hungary):[s.n.],1997:163.
[71]O'Connor B, Irina K. The US Marketing Order System[J].Zeitschrift fur das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht,2004 (3):359-368.
[72]Pinna G.Che cosa bolle davvero in pentola[R].Panorama,2002 (32):47.
[73]Peter M. B.Protection of Geographical Indication in the Wake of TRIPs:Extending United States Laws and the Administration's Proposed Legislation [J]. The Trademark Rep,1994(84):520, 534.
[74]Rangnekar D.Geographical indications:A review of proposals at theTRIPS council:Extending article 23 to products other than wines and Spirits[C]//Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.Geneva UNCTAD/ICTSD.2003 (a):7-8.
[75]Rangnekar D.The Socio-Economics of Geographical Indications:A Review of Empirical Evidence from Europe[C]//Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.Geneva. UNCTAD/ICTSD.2003:3-4.
[76]Rieke JW. Popular feta faces identity crisis[J].Dairy Pipeline,2003, Volume 15 (2):4.
[77]Sarah B.Development from Within?The Potential for Geographical Indications in the Global South[J].The Journal of World Intellectual Property,2010, Vol.13 (2):231-252.
[78]Satish K, Unnikrishnan V. A case for registration of Dharwad Peda under Geographical Indication Act[J].Indian Food Industry,2006, Vol.25 (6):39-41.
[79]Schwab B.The protection of geographical indications in the European conomic community[J].European Intellectual Property Review,1995, Vol.17 (5):42.
[80]Shapiro C.Consumer Information,Product Quality,and Seller Reputation[J].Bell Journal of Economics,1982, Vol.13 (1):20-35.
[81]Thiedig F, Sylvander B. Welcome to the Club? An Economical Approach to Geographical Indications in theEuropean Union[J].Agrarwirtschaft,2000, Vol.49, (12):428-437.
[82]Tregear A, Kuznesof SPolicy initiatives for regional foods:some insights from consumer research[J].Food Policy,1998, Vol.23 (5):383-394.
[83]Tunisia LS.Gis Protection Under TRIPS Agreement:Uniformity Not Extension[J].Juornal of Patent and Trademark Office Society,2005 (87):221.
[84]U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. U.S.Patent and Trademark Office Internet site, home page andTrademark Electronic Search Systempage.Washington,DC[2010-03-16] http://www.uspto.gov/
[85]VitalF.Protectionof geographical indications:The approach of the European Union[C]//Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications. Somerset West:WIPO,1999:52.
[86]Watal J. Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries[R].The Hague [etc.].KluwerLaw International,2001.
[87]Williams RM. Do geographical indications promote sustainable rural development?-Two UK case studies and implications for New Zealand rural development policy [D].New Zealand:Lincoln University,2007.
[88]WIPO.Geographical indications:Historical background, nature of rights, existing systems for protection and obtaining effective protection in other countries[R].Geneva The Secretariat of the World Intellectual Property Organization,2002.
[89]《辞海》[M].上海辞书出版社,2001：1662.
[90]陈思等.湖北省农产品地理标志产业发展分析[J].农业经济问题,2008(增刊)：141-145.
[91]董炳和.地理标志知识产权制度研究[M].中国政法大学出版社,2005.
[92]戴晶.地理标志保护战略研究[J].法制与社会,2008(10)：9-10.
[93]对外贸易经济合作部国际经贸关系司译.世界贸易组织乌拉圭回合多边贸易谈判结果法律文本,2000.
[94]付启明.新农村建设中的地理标志保护问题研究[J].金卡工程,2009(10)：98-99.
[95]冯寿波.论地理标志的国际法律保护一以TRIPS协议为视角[M].北京大学出版社,2008.
[96]冯星,志红.原产地域产品保护规定的经济学分析[J].集团经济研究,2000(3)：108-109.
[97]傅余.法国原产地名称保护制度及借鉴[J].安徽农业科学,2008(16)：6966-6968,6972.
[98]郭红生,赖秀林.地理标志农产品品牌的事件营销策[J].中国市场,2007(52)：95-96.
[99]郭红生.地理标志农产品品牌的水平营销策略[J].商业研究,2009(1)：184-187.
[100]郭红生,胡淑琴.生态型地理标志农产品品牌关系的构建[J].价值工程,2009(6)：86-89.
[101]郭福金.实施地理标志产品保护推进地方区域经济发展[EB/OL]中国质量新闻网(2006-6-30[2010-2-18]. http://www.cqn.com.cn/.
[102]国家工商行政管理局商标局编.中华人民共和国商标法律法规汇编[M].中国法制出版,1995.
[103]郭志刚.社会统计分析方法——SPSS软件应用[M].中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[104]高敏.地理标志注册是兴晋富农的一个有效途径[J].山西农业,2006(8)：32-33.
[105]胡豹等.影响农户农业结构调整决策行为的因素分析—基于浙江省农户的实证[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(2)：50-56.
[106]赫伯特·A·西蒙.管理决策新科学[M].中国社会科学出版社,1982.
[107]黄文华,林燕金.农业标准化实施中农户行为实证分析——基于茶农采标行为的研究[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版)2008(4)：67-70.
[108]姜含春,赵红鹰.我国茶叶地理标志特性及品牌战略研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2009(8)：58-63.
[109]蒋天才.运用地理标志保护制度促进我省农特经济发展[J].贵州论坛2009(1)：48-49.
[110]孔祥俊.WTO知识产权协定及其国内法实用[M].法律出版社,2002.
[111]孔祥军等.提高我国地理标志产品经济效益的对策和思考[J].经济研究导刊2008(1)：10.
[112]李博.浅谈企业的概念[J].法制与社会,2010(3)：286-287.
[113]刘承芳等.农户农业生产性投资影响因素研究[J].中国农村观察,2002(4)：34-42.
[114]林东华.基于产业集群的农产品地理标志管理——以天宝香蕉为例[J].福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(4)：45-50.
[115]李东生.运用农产品商标和地理标志促进农民增收[J].中国工商管理研究,2005(2)：4-7.
[116]刘福刚.保护和发展地理标志是壮大县域经济的重要课题[EB/OL]山西新闻网：山西经济日报(2008-11-120[2010.-2-14]. http://www.daynews.com.cn/sxjjrb/baban/654975.html
[117]林海.农民经济行为的特点及决策机制分析[J].理论导刊,2004(3)：28-30.
[118]龙文懋 知识产权法哲学初论[M].人民出版社,2003：13.
[119]陆仙等.地理标志促农增收[J].中华商标,2008(9)：38-40.
[120]刘义程.加强地理标志保护促进贵州农业经济发展[J].贵州社会主义学院,2005(3)：57-59
[121]林毅夫.小农与经济理性[J].中国农村观察,1988(3)：31-33.
[122]李永明.论原产地名称的法律保护[J].中国法学,1994(3)：65-72.
[123]刘振铎.现代汉语辞海网[M].延边教育出版社,2001：1169.
[124]李祖明.地理标志的保护与管理[M].知识产权出版社,2009.
[125]南方报业网.去年粤农产品涨价10.7%/农民人均增收98元[EB/OL].网易新闻中心,(2005-04-25) [2010-2-3]. http://news.163.com.
[126]]恰亚诺夫,萧正洪译农民经济组织[M].北京：中央编详出版社,1996.
[127]邱兴平.历史与现实的思考——农户经济学[J].中国经济评论,2004(9)：59-62.
[128]史清华.农户经济增长与发展趋势、影响因素及其对策[J].农业经济问题,2000(11)：51-53.
[129]司智陟.地理标志保护制度的构建与农产品品牌发展[J].中国食物与营养,2007(4)：7-10.
[130]吴彬.中国农产品地理标志保护中存在的问题及原因[J].世界农业,2008(3)：24-26.
[131]王芳等.农户实施农业标准化生产行为的理论和实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2007(12)：75-79.
[132]王莲峰.制定我国地理标志保护法的构想[J].法学,2005(5)：69-74
[133]王莲峰.地理标志保护模式之争与我国的立法选择[J].华东政法学院学报,2006(6)：44-53.
[134]王济川,郭志刚.logistic回归模型——方法与应用[M].高等教育出版社,2001.
[135]王肃.农产品竞争力与地理标志制度[J].现代商业,2008(33)：172-173.
[136]王肃.集体专有与个体共有地理标志制度的权利配置[J].现代商业化,2009(2)：293-294.
[137]王文,方维亮.特色农产品地理标志保护与安徽农业[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006(6)：24-27.
[138]王笑冰.地理标志的经济分析[J].学术论坛,2005(5)：20-26.
[139]王笑冰.法国对地理标志的法律保护[J].电子知识产权,2006(40：16-21.
[140]王笑冰.印度对地理标志的保护[J].中华商标,2004(4)：4244.
[141]王志本.地理标志保护的国际格局、争端案例及我国取向[J].知识产权,2005(2)：33-35.
[142]王志本.实施地理标志保护促进中国东北大豆产业发展[J].中国农村经济,2006(12)：25-31.
[143]王志本.我国传统名特优农产品的地理标志保护[J].农业经济问题,2005(4)：54-57.
[144]谢冬伟.我国地理标志保护制度的历史与发展[J].工商行政管理,2003(11)：2.
[145]西奥多.W.舒尔茨著.梁小民译.改造传统农业[M].北京：商务印书馆,1987：3.
[146]徐薇.农业产业化与农户生产行为[J].天府新论,1998(1)：43-47.
[147]许欣,邱实.经营运作地理标志提升农产品出口竞争力[J].农业经济,2006(7)：71-72.
[148]杨克涛.地理标志保护与区域经济发展[J].合作经济与科技,2009(1)：12-13.
[149]严瑞珍.现代化进程中的农业资源转移与农民权益保护[J].浙江师范大学学报,2005(2)：30-31.
[150]杨万江.安全农产品生产经济效益研究——基于农户及其关联企业的实证分析[D].浙江大学,2006.
[151]袁园,盛松华.保护农产品地理标志的经济合理性分析[J].世界农业,2009(2)：64—66.
[152]张敦兰.浅析地理标志保护对我国农业经济发展的意义[J].河北农业科学,2008(5)：108-109,112.
[153]郑成思.世界贸易组织与贸易有关的知识产权协议[M].中国人民大学出版社,1996：176.
[154]赵东艳.地理标志保护的方式及在我国农业经济发展中的作用[J].科技成果纵横,2007(1)25-26.
[155]古辉斌.消费者对地理标志产品的认知程度以及购买意愿研究[J].消费经济,2010(04)：55-57.
[156]古辉斌.消费者对黄山地理标志茶叶认知及购买行为的计量经济分析[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2011(02)
[157]中国科学技术交流中心.法国原产地名称保护制度及借鉴[EB/OL].[2010-1-27]http://www.cstec.org.cn/about/kanwu_detail_show.aspx?sid=17.
[158]张汉林编著.智慧财产的卫十——知识产权国际保护的比较研究[M].中国经济出版社,1997.
[159]中华人民共和国国家知识产权局.我国地理标志产品保护制度10年发展之路全扫[EB/O (2009-10-27) [2010.1-27].http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/mtjj/2009/200910/t20091027_478854.html.
[160]中华人民共和国国家知识产权局.地理标志保护的法律模式[EB/OL].(2006-5-27) [2010-1-27]http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/dtxx/gw/2006/200804/t20080401_353190.html2006-04-13.
[161]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局令第78号《地理标志产品保护规定》
[162]曾洁.地理标志保护的经济学分析[J].求索,2008(9)：140-142.
[163]郑立.企业法通论[M].中国人民大学出版社,1993.
[164]张龙,陈永红.地理标志产品与地区经济发展[J].中国食物与营养,2008(2)：16-18.
[165]张仁辉.论国际法中的地理标志权[EB/OL].中国地理标志产品保护网,(2006-4-25)[2010-1-23].http://www.chinapgi.org/SiteNewView.asp?ID=824&SortID=49.
[166]张瑞祥.行业组织在地理标志保护中的作用[J].科技风,2008(04)：68.
[167]章胜勇,李崇光.运用地理标志提升农产品市场竞争力[J].农业经济,2007(9)：P80-81.
[168]张晓凤等.农户安全农产品供给的影响因素分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010(14)：7591-7594.
[169]赵小平.地理标志的法律保护研究[M].法律出版社,2007.
[170]张西涛.中请地理标志对农产品经济效益的影响分析[D].南京农业大学,2007.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |