复杂环境状态下高速列车脱轨机理研究
|
摘要
列车脱轨问题机理十分复杂,不确定的影响因素较多,是全世界铁路工业界难以解决的理论和技术问题。在车辆／轨道关键零部件失效和自然灾害等复杂环境状态下,高速列车运行安全性受到极大威胁,由其造成的重大脱轨事故并不少见。目前的车辆／轨道动力学理论方法难以描述复杂环境状态下高速列车动态行为、脱轨发生的瞬态过程、脱轨特征和机理。同时,全世界高速列车脱轨判别准则和安全评估准则不统一不完善、不科学,甚至不合理。现有的脱轨准则只考虑单一或少数影响因素,且被独立运用到列车安全评估中。因此,复杂环境状态下高速列车脱轨机理和安全运行评估研究有待进一步深入。
论文受国家自然科学基金项目“复杂环境下高速列车动态脱轨机理的研究(50875218)”、“高速列车运行安全的关键科学技术问题研究(50821063)”和“四川省科技计划项目(2010JY0070)”等项目的资助,主要开展了以下几方面的研究工作：
(1)建立了较为完整的高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型,并发展了相应的数值程序。模型主要由五个子系统组成,分别是车辆系统动力学模型、轨道系统动力学模型、轮轨空间动态接触模型、车辆／轨道耦合界面激励模式和脱轨安全域评判新体系。对复杂环境状态,根据其特性,作为高速列车／轨道耦合动态系统的广义边界特性,体现在高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型中。
(2)改进了单节车和多节车车辆系统动力学模型。模型中,单节车辆由35个自由度的多刚体系统模拟；多节车辆考虑典型的8辆编组,每节车由42个自由度的多刚体系统模拟。忽略车辆系统所有部件的结构弹性变形,并假设车辆匀速运行,不考虑列车纵向的加、减速运动。车辆系统各连接部件简化为弹簧-阻尼连接单元,采用分段线性来模拟其非线性动力特性。
(3)改进了三层(钢轨-轨枕-道床-路基)有砟轨道动力学模型和三维实体有限元板式无砟轨道动力学模型。轨下结构纵向被离散,离散原则以各轨枕支点为基元,考虑轨道刚度纵向不均匀变化特性。钢轨视为连续弹性离散点支承的无限Timoshenko梁,考虑钢轨的横向、垂向和扭转振动。有砟轨道中,轨枕简化为Euler梁模型,考虑轨枕的垂向弯曲振动和横向刚体运动,道床简化为垂向离散等效质量块。每个支撑单元采用双质量(轨枕和道床)三层(钢轨-轨枕-道床-路基)弹簧-阻尼振动模型。无砟轨道中,轨道板用三维实体有限元单元模拟,钢轨扣件和CA砂浆层用周期性离散的粘弹性单元模拟。
(4)建立了轮轨空间动态耦合模型。模型中,轮轨接触点采用迹线法和最小距离法确定,考虑轨道系统动态响应和钢轨弹性变形对轮轨接触几何及轮轨耦合相互作用力的影响。轮轨法向力采用改进轮轨法向挤压量计算公式和Hertz非线性弹性接触理论求解。轮轨切向力采用Kalker线性理论计算,再以Shen-Hedrick-Elkins理论进行非线性修正。
(5)提出和采用“跟踪窗户(Tracking Window)"新型车辆／轨道耦合激励模式。模型中,假设车辆匀速运动,忽略车辆／轨道系统纵向振动特性,车辆相对钢轨不移动,而轨下支撑结构,包括钢轨扣件、轨下垫层、轨道板、轨枕、道床及轮轨系统不平顺沿行车相反方向作相对运动,运动速度和行车速度相同。
(6)补充完善了基于轮轨动态接触关系的轮轨接触点横向位置和车轮抬升量动态脱轨评判准则,提出和构建了脱轨安全域评判体系。其基本思想为,利用动力学模型计算各种关键因素对复杂环境状态下高速列车／轨道耦合系统动态响应的影响,结合几种常用的脱轨评价准则,确定不同评价准则下的脱轨安全界限,最终得到考虑多种影响因素及不同脱轨指标的列车脱轨与安全运行域,从而将其运用到高速列车的脱轨评价分析中。
基于上述数值计算模型,针对复杂环境状态下高速列车脱轨问题,开展了轨道结构件失效、线路鼓胀、强风环境和地震环境等4方面的研究：
(1)建立了轨道结构件失效下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了无砟曲线线路上,高轨、低轨和双侧扣件失效对车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性的影响,并对行车速度和扣件失效个数两个关键因素进行了脱轨安全性影响规律调查分析；计算分析了在有砟直线和有砟曲线线路上,轨下支撑失效对系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性的影响,对比分析了轨下支撑失效下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为,调查分析了行车速度和扣件失效个数两个关键因素的影响规律,构建和分析了轨下支撑失效下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
(2)建立了鼓胀状态下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了直线有砟和曲线有砟两种轨道类型,线路鼓胀对车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性的影响,对比分析了线路鼓胀状态下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为,调查分析了鼓胀幅值、波长和行车速度等关键因素的影响规律,构建和分析了线路鼓胀下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
(3)建立了强风状态下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了直线稳态横风、瞬态阵风和隧道出口瞬态阵风等典型强风环境下车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性,对比分析了强风环境下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为,调查分析了风速、风向角和行车速度等关键因素的影响规律,构建和分析了强风环境下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
(4)建立了地震状态下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了横向、垂向和横-垂向地震波作用下车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性；对比分析了地震环境下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为；调查分析了地震波频谱特性、地震波强度、横-垂向地震波比值和行车速度等关键因素的影响规律；构建和分析了地震环境下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
The mechanism of train derailment is quite complicated and involved in many uncertain influencing factors. Fully understanding and solving it is still a very difficult theoretical and technological project in railways all over the world. Now the environmental state of natural disasters and the failure of the key parts of railway vehicle and track is a threatening to the safety operation of high-speed trains, and in the past caused many serious derailment occurring. So far, the dynamical behavior and characteristics of high-speed operating trains in such a severe environmental state cannot be clearly described by using the existing coupling dynamics theories of railway vehicle and track, especially the transient process of derailing and its mechanism understanding. In addition, railways around the world have not reached a consensus on the widely used derailment criteria and operation safety estimating standards of high-speed trains. The railways of different countries and areas hire the different derailment criteria and operation safety estimating standards, some of which are deficient, unscientific and even unreasonable. People don't understand their internal relations even if the application purposes of them are the same. The most of them consider a single influencing factor or few influencing factors only. Usually one or two of them is alonely used in evaluating the safety operation of high-speed trains and the obtained consequences have been doubted. Hence, it is very necessary to further make an investigation into the derailment mechanism of high-speed trains operating in the severe environmental state, the boundaries between derailment occurring and safety operation areas, and the internal relation and difference of the existing derailment criteria.
The thesis is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation Projects of China'Study on Mechanism of High-speed Train Transient Derailment in Severe Environmental State (50875218)'and'Research on Key Problems of Science and Technology of High-speed Trains in Satety Operation (50821063)', and'Science and Technology Planning Project in Sichuan Province (2010JY0070)'. The following researches were conducted.
(1) A whole model of the transient derailment mechanism of high-speed train and its matching computational code are developed. This model considers the five subsystems:a railway vehicle, a track, wheel/rail in transient rolling contact, the boundary excitations of the vehicle/track coupling system and a new system of estimating safety operation of high-speed trains. According to the characteristics of the defined severe environmental state, they are included in the dynamics model of a high-speed train coupled with a track as general boundary conditions.
(2) The developed model of railway vehicle considers both single vehicle and multi-vehicles. The single vehicle model has35degrees of freedom and the multi-vehicle model considers8vehicles with42degrees of freedom for each vehicle, which are the rigid multi-body models. All the parts of the vehicle in service neglect their deformation, the operation speed is assumed to be a constant and the accelerations and decelerations of the vehicle parts are also ignored in the modeling. The connections between the parts are replaced with the equivalent spring/damper systems. The nonlinear connections are characterized with piecewise linearities.
(3) This thesis improves the ballasted track dynamics model with three layers (rails-sleepers-ballast) and the slab track dynamics model which uses the finite element method to model the slabs. The infrastructure of the rails is treated as a discrete system with sleeper supporter units, in which the variation of the track stiffness along the track is considered. A pair of rails is modelled by using the finite Timoshenko beam with discrete supporters which takes the vertical and lateral motions and rotation of the rail into account. In modeling the ballasted track, a sleeper is treated as the Euler beam the vertical and lateral motions and rolling of which are considered. The ballast bed is replaced with equivalent discrete mass bodies. Each support unit of the track consists of dual-mass (sleeper and ballasted body) and three-layer spring-damper system (rail-sleeper-ballast bed-roadbase). In modelling the slab track, the slab is modeled by using three-dimensional solid finite elements, the fasteners and the CA screed are replaced with periodically discrete viscoelasticity unit systems.
(4) A new spatial calculation model of wheel/rail in transient rolling contact is developed, in which the wheel/rail contact points are still determined based on the traditional "tracing method" and the traditional "minimum distance method ". The model considers the effect of the track transient responses on the wheel/rail contact geometry and the interaction of the wheel/rail. The normal forces are calculated by using the improved formula of wheel/rail normal approaching and the nonlinear spring based on Hertzian contact theory. The wheel/rail tangent forces are determined by using the model of Shen-Hedrick-Elkins.
(5) In the modelling a train operating along a track a "Tracking Window" technique is adopted to simulate the train moving with respect to the track (tangent and curved tracks) at a constant speed. This is a new vehicle/track interaction model. In this model, the constant speed of the train is available and it is assumed that the infrastructure of the rails moves at a constant speed of the train with respect to the train that is assumed to be in a static state in the window. The longitudinal motion variation of all the parts of the vehicle and the track is neglected. The infrastructure contains fasteners, slabs or sleepers, ballast, CA layer replacement, subgrade and irregularity between wheel/rail.
(6) In estimating the dynamical behaviour and the safety operation of a high-speed train, two more derailment criteria are put forward based on the lateral location of wheel/rail contact point and the wheel rise with respect to the rail, which are obtained through the calculation by using the improved model of wheel/rail in transient rolling contact. A new evaluation system for estimating the safety operation and the derailment occurring of high-speed trains in severe environmental state is developed. The basic idea of the estimating system is that the effect of the key influencing factors in changing on the dynamical behavior and derailment occurring process of a high-speed train operating in several severe environmental state is numerically reproduced by using the transient derailment model of a high-speed train with a track, in which the safety operation area, the derailment occurring area and their boundaries are obtained through the detailed numerical calculation. These areas are constructed by using the key influencing factors and the limits of all the considered derailment criteria in the present paper and their internal relationships are shown clearly in these areas. They are very useful for estimating the safety operation of high-speed trains.
Using the above models and methods analyze the dynamical behavior and derailment occurring process of a high-speed train operating in several severe environmental states which includes fastener failure, track buckling, strong crosswind and earthquake.
(1) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under the condition of fastener failure is developed, and used to analyze the effect of the failure of fasteners on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle. The analysis considers the cases that the failure of different fasteners occurs, respectively, on the high rail, the low rail and both the high and low rails of the tangent and curved ballasted tracks. In the analysis, the two key influencing factors are, respectively, the number of the failed fasteners and the operation speed of the vehicle, which are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
(2) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under the condition of track buckling is developed, and used to analyze the effect of the track buckling on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle. The analysis considers the2cases that the buckling occurs, respectively, on a tangent and curved ballasted tracks. In the analysis, the three key influencing factors are, respectively, the wavelength and amplitude of the track buckling and the operation speed of the vehicle, which are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
(3) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under the condition of strong crosswind is developed, and used to analyze the effect of strong crosswind on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle operating on a tangent track. In the analysis, the three key influencing factors are, respectively, the wind speed, the wind angle and the operation speed of the vehicle, which are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
(4) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under earthquake is developed, and used to analyze the effect of earthquakes on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle operating on a tangent track. In the analysis, the four key influencing factors are, respectively, the earthquake intensity, the direction of earthquake wave propagation, the vehicle speed, and earthquake spectrum characteristics. The former three factors are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
论文受国家自然科学基金项目“复杂环境下高速列车动态脱轨机理的研究(50875218)”、“高速列车运行安全的关键科学技术问题研究(50821063)”和“四川省科技计划项目(2010JY0070)”等项目的资助,主要开展了以下几方面的研究工作：
(1)建立了较为完整的高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型,并发展了相应的数值程序。模型主要由五个子系统组成,分别是车辆系统动力学模型、轨道系统动力学模型、轮轨空间动态接触模型、车辆／轨道耦合界面激励模式和脱轨安全域评判新体系。对复杂环境状态,根据其特性,作为高速列车／轨道耦合动态系统的广义边界特性,体现在高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型中。
(2)改进了单节车和多节车车辆系统动力学模型。模型中,单节车辆由35个自由度的多刚体系统模拟；多节车辆考虑典型的8辆编组,每节车由42个自由度的多刚体系统模拟。忽略车辆系统所有部件的结构弹性变形,并假设车辆匀速运行,不考虑列车纵向的加、减速运动。车辆系统各连接部件简化为弹簧-阻尼连接单元,采用分段线性来模拟其非线性动力特性。
(3)改进了三层(钢轨-轨枕-道床-路基)有砟轨道动力学模型和三维实体有限元板式无砟轨道动力学模型。轨下结构纵向被离散,离散原则以各轨枕支点为基元,考虑轨道刚度纵向不均匀变化特性。钢轨视为连续弹性离散点支承的无限Timoshenko梁,考虑钢轨的横向、垂向和扭转振动。有砟轨道中,轨枕简化为Euler梁模型,考虑轨枕的垂向弯曲振动和横向刚体运动,道床简化为垂向离散等效质量块。每个支撑单元采用双质量(轨枕和道床)三层(钢轨-轨枕-道床-路基)弹簧-阻尼振动模型。无砟轨道中,轨道板用三维实体有限元单元模拟,钢轨扣件和CA砂浆层用周期性离散的粘弹性单元模拟。
(4)建立了轮轨空间动态耦合模型。模型中,轮轨接触点采用迹线法和最小距离法确定,考虑轨道系统动态响应和钢轨弹性变形对轮轨接触几何及轮轨耦合相互作用力的影响。轮轨法向力采用改进轮轨法向挤压量计算公式和Hertz非线性弹性接触理论求解。轮轨切向力采用Kalker线性理论计算,再以Shen-Hedrick-Elkins理论进行非线性修正。
(5)提出和采用“跟踪窗户(Tracking Window)"新型车辆／轨道耦合激励模式。模型中,假设车辆匀速运动,忽略车辆／轨道系统纵向振动特性,车辆相对钢轨不移动,而轨下支撑结构,包括钢轨扣件、轨下垫层、轨道板、轨枕、道床及轮轨系统不平顺沿行车相反方向作相对运动,运动速度和行车速度相同。
(6)补充完善了基于轮轨动态接触关系的轮轨接触点横向位置和车轮抬升量动态脱轨评判准则,提出和构建了脱轨安全域评判体系。其基本思想为,利用动力学模型计算各种关键因素对复杂环境状态下高速列车／轨道耦合系统动态响应的影响,结合几种常用的脱轨评价准则,确定不同评价准则下的脱轨安全界限,最终得到考虑多种影响因素及不同脱轨指标的列车脱轨与安全运行域,从而将其运用到高速列车的脱轨评价分析中。
基于上述数值计算模型,针对复杂环境状态下高速列车脱轨问题,开展了轨道结构件失效、线路鼓胀、强风环境和地震环境等4方面的研究：
(1)建立了轨道结构件失效下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了无砟曲线线路上,高轨、低轨和双侧扣件失效对车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性的影响,并对行车速度和扣件失效个数两个关键因素进行了脱轨安全性影响规律调查分析；计算分析了在有砟直线和有砟曲线线路上,轨下支撑失效对系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性的影响,对比分析了轨下支撑失效下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为,调查分析了行车速度和扣件失效个数两个关键因素的影响规律,构建和分析了轨下支撑失效下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
(2)建立了鼓胀状态下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了直线有砟和曲线有砟两种轨道类型,线路鼓胀对车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性的影响,对比分析了线路鼓胀状态下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为,调查分析了鼓胀幅值、波长和行车速度等关键因素的影响规律,构建和分析了线路鼓胀下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
(3)建立了强风状态下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了直线稳态横风、瞬态阵风和隧道出口瞬态阵风等典型强风环境下车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性,对比分析了强风环境下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为,调查分析了风速、风向角和行车速度等关键因素的影响规律,构建和分析了强风环境下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
(4)建立了地震状态下高速列车动态脱轨机理研究模型。计算分析了横向、垂向和横-垂向地震波作用下车辆／轨道耦合系统动态响应和车辆脱轨安全性；对比分析了地震环境下脱轨临界工况和脱轨发生工况的车辆脱轨行为；调查分析了地震波频谱特性、地震波强度、横-垂向地震波比值和行车速度等关键因素的影响规律；构建和分析了地震环境下高速列车的脱轨与安全运行域。
The mechanism of train derailment is quite complicated and involved in many uncertain influencing factors. Fully understanding and solving it is still a very difficult theoretical and technological project in railways all over the world. Now the environmental state of natural disasters and the failure of the key parts of railway vehicle and track is a threatening to the safety operation of high-speed trains, and in the past caused many serious derailment occurring. So far, the dynamical behavior and characteristics of high-speed operating trains in such a severe environmental state cannot be clearly described by using the existing coupling dynamics theories of railway vehicle and track, especially the transient process of derailing and its mechanism understanding. In addition, railways around the world have not reached a consensus on the widely used derailment criteria and operation safety estimating standards of high-speed trains. The railways of different countries and areas hire the different derailment criteria and operation safety estimating standards, some of which are deficient, unscientific and even unreasonable. People don't understand their internal relations even if the application purposes of them are the same. The most of them consider a single influencing factor or few influencing factors only. Usually one or two of them is alonely used in evaluating the safety operation of high-speed trains and the obtained consequences have been doubted. Hence, it is very necessary to further make an investigation into the derailment mechanism of high-speed trains operating in the severe environmental state, the boundaries between derailment occurring and safety operation areas, and the internal relation and difference of the existing derailment criteria.
The thesis is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation Projects of China'Study on Mechanism of High-speed Train Transient Derailment in Severe Environmental State (50875218)'and'Research on Key Problems of Science and Technology of High-speed Trains in Satety Operation (50821063)', and'Science and Technology Planning Project in Sichuan Province (2010JY0070)'. The following researches were conducted.
(1) A whole model of the transient derailment mechanism of high-speed train and its matching computational code are developed. This model considers the five subsystems:a railway vehicle, a track, wheel/rail in transient rolling contact, the boundary excitations of the vehicle/track coupling system and a new system of estimating safety operation of high-speed trains. According to the characteristics of the defined severe environmental state, they are included in the dynamics model of a high-speed train coupled with a track as general boundary conditions.
(2) The developed model of railway vehicle considers both single vehicle and multi-vehicles. The single vehicle model has35degrees of freedom and the multi-vehicle model considers8vehicles with42degrees of freedom for each vehicle, which are the rigid multi-body models. All the parts of the vehicle in service neglect their deformation, the operation speed is assumed to be a constant and the accelerations and decelerations of the vehicle parts are also ignored in the modeling. The connections between the parts are replaced with the equivalent spring/damper systems. The nonlinear connections are characterized with piecewise linearities.
(3) This thesis improves the ballasted track dynamics model with three layers (rails-sleepers-ballast) and the slab track dynamics model which uses the finite element method to model the slabs. The infrastructure of the rails is treated as a discrete system with sleeper supporter units, in which the variation of the track stiffness along the track is considered. A pair of rails is modelled by using the finite Timoshenko beam with discrete supporters which takes the vertical and lateral motions and rotation of the rail into account. In modeling the ballasted track, a sleeper is treated as the Euler beam the vertical and lateral motions and rolling of which are considered. The ballast bed is replaced with equivalent discrete mass bodies. Each support unit of the track consists of dual-mass (sleeper and ballasted body) and three-layer spring-damper system (rail-sleeper-ballast bed-roadbase). In modelling the slab track, the slab is modeled by using three-dimensional solid finite elements, the fasteners and the CA screed are replaced with periodically discrete viscoelasticity unit systems.
(4) A new spatial calculation model of wheel/rail in transient rolling contact is developed, in which the wheel/rail contact points are still determined based on the traditional "tracing method" and the traditional "minimum distance method ". The model considers the effect of the track transient responses on the wheel/rail contact geometry and the interaction of the wheel/rail. The normal forces are calculated by using the improved formula of wheel/rail normal approaching and the nonlinear spring based on Hertzian contact theory. The wheel/rail tangent forces are determined by using the model of Shen-Hedrick-Elkins.
(5) In the modelling a train operating along a track a "Tracking Window" technique is adopted to simulate the train moving with respect to the track (tangent and curved tracks) at a constant speed. This is a new vehicle/track interaction model. In this model, the constant speed of the train is available and it is assumed that the infrastructure of the rails moves at a constant speed of the train with respect to the train that is assumed to be in a static state in the window. The longitudinal motion variation of all the parts of the vehicle and the track is neglected. The infrastructure contains fasteners, slabs or sleepers, ballast, CA layer replacement, subgrade and irregularity between wheel/rail.
(6) In estimating the dynamical behaviour and the safety operation of a high-speed train, two more derailment criteria are put forward based on the lateral location of wheel/rail contact point and the wheel rise with respect to the rail, which are obtained through the calculation by using the improved model of wheel/rail in transient rolling contact. A new evaluation system for estimating the safety operation and the derailment occurring of high-speed trains in severe environmental state is developed. The basic idea of the estimating system is that the effect of the key influencing factors in changing on the dynamical behavior and derailment occurring process of a high-speed train operating in several severe environmental state is numerically reproduced by using the transient derailment model of a high-speed train with a track, in which the safety operation area, the derailment occurring area and their boundaries are obtained through the detailed numerical calculation. These areas are constructed by using the key influencing factors and the limits of all the considered derailment criteria in the present paper and their internal relationships are shown clearly in these areas. They are very useful for estimating the safety operation of high-speed trains.
Using the above models and methods analyze the dynamical behavior and derailment occurring process of a high-speed train operating in several severe environmental states which includes fastener failure, track buckling, strong crosswind and earthquake.
(1) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under the condition of fastener failure is developed, and used to analyze the effect of the failure of fasteners on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle. The analysis considers the cases that the failure of different fasteners occurs, respectively, on the high rail, the low rail and both the high and low rails of the tangent and curved ballasted tracks. In the analysis, the two key influencing factors are, respectively, the number of the failed fasteners and the operation speed of the vehicle, which are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
(2) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under the condition of track buckling is developed, and used to analyze the effect of the track buckling on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle. The analysis considers the2cases that the buckling occurs, respectively, on a tangent and curved ballasted tracks. In the analysis, the three key influencing factors are, respectively, the wavelength and amplitude of the track buckling and the operation speed of the vehicle, which are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
(3) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under the condition of strong crosswind is developed, and used to analyze the effect of strong crosswind on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle operating on a tangent track. In the analysis, the three key influencing factors are, respectively, the wind speed, the wind angle and the operation speed of the vehicle, which are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
(4) The transient derailment model of high-speed vehicle operation under earthquake is developed, and used to analyze the effect of earthquakes on the dynamical behaviour, the safety operation and the derailment occurring of a high-speed vehicle operating on a tangent track. In the analysis, the four key influencing factors are, respectively, the earthquake intensity, the direction of earthquake wave propagation, the vehicle speed, and earthquake spectrum characteristics. The former three factors are used to construct the safety operation and derailment occurring areas and their boundary of the vehicle, and also the limits of all the considered derailment criteria shown in the areas.
引文
[1]中国铁道部数据中心.中国铁道2009年统计公报[R].北京,2010.
[2]中国铁道部.中长期铁路网规划(2008年调整)[R].北京,2008.
[3]金学松,郭俊,肖新标,温泽峰,周仲荣.高速列车安全运行研究的关键科学问题[J].工程力学,2009,26(S2)：8-22.
[4]Brabie D. On the influence of rail vehicle parameters on the derailment process and its consequences [D]. Licentiate Thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden,2005.
[5]史密斯.钢轨滚动接触疲劳的进一步研究[J].中国铁道科学,2002,23(3)：6-10.
[6]Magel E, Roney M, Kalousek J, Sroba P. The blending of theory and practice in modern rail grinding [J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials& Structures.2003, 26(10):921-929.
[7]ERRI. Special earthquake report-preliminary observation on the Niigata Ken Chuetsu[R], Japan, earthquake of 23 October 2004, Journal 2005.
[8]Schetz J A. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001,33(1):371-414.
[9]Iwnicki S. Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics [M]. Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 2006.
[10]翟婉明.车辆-轨道耦合动力学(第三版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2007.
[11]曾庆元,向俊,周智辉,娄平.列车脱轨分析理论与应用[M].长沙：中南大学出版社.
[12]Nadal M J. Theorie de stabilit'e des Locomotives, part 2, Mouvement de Lacet[J]. Annales des Mines,1896,10:232.
[13]Weinstock H. Wheel climb derailment criteria for evaluation of rail vehicle safety [C]//Proceedings of the ASME winter annual meeting.1984,84:1-7.
[14]Yokose K. A theory of the derailment of wheelset [J]. Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports,1966,7(3):30-34.
[15]Gilchrist A, Brickle B. A re-examination of the proneness to derailment of a railway wheelset [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,1976,18(3):134-141.
[16]Koci H, Swenson C. Locomotive wheel-rail loading-A systems approach[C]// Proceedings of the Heavy Haul Railway Conference. Perth, Western Australia,1978.
[17]Shust W, Thompson R, Elkins J. Controlled wheel climb derailment tests using a force measuring wheelset and AAR's track loading vehicle[C]//Proceeding of 12th International Wheelset Congress. Qingdao, China,1998.
[18]铁道部科学研究院.环形线货物列车直线段脱轨试验研究报告[R].北京：铁道部科学研究院,2000.
[19]Matsudaira T. Dynamics of high speed rolling stock[J]. Japanese National Railways RTRI Quarterly Reports, Special issue,1963.
[20]001. AAR Mechanical Division, Manual of standards and recommended practices, section c-part Ⅱ, volume 1, Chapter XI, section 11.5.2 Track-Worthiness Criteria[S]. Adopted 1987, Revised 1993.
[21]Federal Railroad Administration. Track safety standards, part 213, subpart G[S]. September,1998.
[22]Wu H, Elkins J. Investigation of wheel flange climb derailment criteria[R]. Association of American Railroads Report R-931,1999.
[23]Elkins J, Wu H. New criteria for flange climb derailment[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference. Newark, NJ, April 4-6,2000:1-7.
[24]曾宇清,王卫东,舒兴高,于卫东.车辆脱轨安全评判的动态限度[J].中国铁道科学,1999,20(4)：70-77.
[25]薛弼一.脱轨机理及试验研究[D].成都：西南交通大学博士学位论文,1998.
[26]Zeng Jing, Guan Qinghua. Study on flange climb derailment criteria of a railway wheelset[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,46(3):239-251.
[27]GB 5599-85.铁道车辆动力学性能评定和试验鉴定规范[S].北京：中国计划出版社,1985.
[28]Miyamoto M. Mechanism of derailment phenomena of railway vehicles[J]. QR of RTRI, 1996,37(3):147-155.
[29]翟婉明,陈果.根据车轮抬升量评判车辆脱轨的方法与准则[J].铁道学报,2001,23(2)：17-26.
[30]Xiang J, Zeng Q. A study on mechanical mechanism of train derailment and preventive measures for derailment [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2005,43(2):121-147.
[31]Elkins J, Carter A. Testing and analysis techniques for safety assessment of rail vehicles: the state-of-the-art [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1993,22(3-4):185-208.
[32]Wilson N, Fries R, Witte M, Haigermoser A, Wrang M, Evans J, Orlova A. Assessment of safety against derailment using simulations and vehicle acceptance tests:a worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2011, 49(7):1113-1157.
[33]Nagase K, Wakabayashi Y, Sakahara H. A study of the phenomenon of wheel climb derailment:results of basic experiments using model bogies [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2002, 216(4):237-247.
[34]Kanehara H, Ohno K. Development of a continuous measuring system for contact position between wheel and rail toward clarification of derailment mechanism [J]. JR East Technical Review,2003 (2).
[35]Braghin F, Bruni S, Diana G. Experimental and numerical investigation on the derailment of a railway wheelset with solid axle [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2006, 44:305-325.
[36]E1 Ouali M, Cloupet S, Chollet H, Ayasse JB, Chevalier L, Courteille D. Experimental tests and numerical simulations of railway vehicles at low speed in derailment conditions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2008,46:1013-1021.
[37]Doumiati M, Victorino A, Charara A, Lechner D. Lateral load transfer and normal forces estimation for vehicle safety:experimental test [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2009, 47:1511-1533.
[38]Eom B G, Kang B B, Lee H S. A study on running stability assessment methods for 1/5 small scaled bogie of saemaul using small-scaled derailment simulator [J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,2013,14(4):589-598.
[39]Wu H. Investigation of wheel rail interaction on wheel flange climb derailment and wheel rail profile compatibility [D]. Ph.D Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology,2000.
[40]Kik W, Menssen R, Moelle D, Bergander B, Vincent. Comparison of results of calculations and measurements of DYSAF-test, a research project to investigate safety limits of derailment at high speeds [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2002,37(suppl.): 543-553.
[41]Parena D, Kuka N, Masmoudi W, Kik W. Derailment simulation parametric study [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1999,33(suppl):155-167.
[42]Clementson J, Evans J. The use of dynamic simulation in the investigation of derailment incidents [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2002,37(suppl.):338-349.
[43]Eom B G, Lee H S. Assessment of running safety of railway vehicles using multibody dynamics [J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,2010, 11(2):315-320.
[44]Sweet L M, Karmel A, Moy P. Wheelset Derailment Criteria under Steady Rolling and Lateral Impact Conditions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1979,8:229-234.
[45]Sweet L M, Karmel A, Fairley SR. Derailment Mechanics and Safety Criteria for Complete Rail Vehicle Trucks [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1981,10:203-206.
[46]Sweet L M, Karmel A, Budell R, Lassman D, Schulte D. Theory and Measurement of Derailment Quotients[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 1983,12:177-178.
[47]Rismantab-Sany J. Another look at the single wheel derailment criteria[C]//Railroad Conference,1996, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME/IEEE Joint. IEEE,1996:17-22.
[48]Ishida H, Matsuo M. Safety Criteria for Evaluation of Railway Vehicle Derailment [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,1999,40(1):18-25.
[49]Ishida H, Miyamoto T, Maebashi E, et al. Safety assessment for flange climb derailment of trains running at low speeds on sharp curves [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2006, 47(2):65-71.
[50]Ohno K. Research and development for eliminating wheel climb derailment accidents[J]. JR East Technical Review,2003 (2).
[51]Sato Y, Matsumoto A, Ohno H, et al. Wheel/rail contact analysis of tramways and LRVs against derailment [J]. Wear,2008,265(9):1460-1464.
[52]Magel E, Tajaddini A, Trosino M, et al. Traction, forces, wheel climb and damage in high-speed railway operations [J]. Wear,2008,265(9):1446-1451.
[53]Hung C, Suda Y, Aki M, et al. Study on detection of the early signs of derailment for railway vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010,48(S1):451-466.
[54]Mohammadzadeh S, Sangtarashha M, Molatefi H. A novel method to estimate derailment probability due to track geometric irregularities using reliability techniques and advanced simulation methods [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics,2011,81(11): 1621-1637.
[55]Miyamoto T, Suzumura J, Nakahashi J, et al. Change in Surface Condition of Turned Wheel and Effectiveness of Lubrication against Flange Climb Derailment[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2012,53(2):70-76.
[56]Barbosa R S. A 3D contact force safety criterion for flange climb derailment of a railway wheel [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2004,42(5):289-300.
[57]Barbosa R S. Safety of a railway wheelset-derailment simulation with increasing lateral force [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2009,47(12):1493-1510.
[58]Shust W C, Elkins J A. Wheel forces during flange climb. I. Track loading vehicle tests[C]//Railroad Conference,1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/ASME Joint. IEEE, 1997:137-147.
[59]Elkins J A, Shust W C. Wheel forces during flange climb. Ⅱ. NUCARS simulations[C]// Railroad Conference,1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/ASME Joint. IEEE,1997: 149-156.
[60]Wu H, Elkins J. Investigation of wheel flange climb derailment criteria [J]. Report R-931, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC,1999,7.
[61]Wu H, Shu X, Wilson N. Track-Related Research:Volume 5:Flange Climb Derailment Criteria And Wheel/Rail Profile Management And Maintenance Guidelines For Transit Operations [M]. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies,2005.
[62]Shu X, Wilson N, Wu H, et al. A bi-parameter distance criterion for flange climb derailment[C]//Rail Conference,2005. Proceedings of the 2005 ASME/IEEE Joint. IEEE,2005:9-17.
[63]Shu X, Wilson N. Simulation of dynamic gauge widening and rail roll:effects on derailment and rolling contact fatigue [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2008,46:981-994.
[64]Matej J, Piotrowski J, Wojtyra M, et al. Modelling and safety examination of the long bimodal train on curved track using ADAMS/RAIL[C]//Proceedings of the 1st MSC. ADAMS European User Conference (CDROM).2002.
[65]Boronenko Y, Orlova A, Iofan A, Galperin S. Effects that appear during the derailment of one wheelset in the freight wagon:simulation and testing [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2006,44:663-668.
[66]Santamaria J, Vadillo E G, Gomez J. Influence of creep forces on the risk of derailment of railway vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2009,47(6):721-752.
[67]Schindler C, Schwickert M, Simonis A. Structural safety of trams in case of misguidance in a switch [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2010,48:967-981.
[68]Facchinetti A, Mazzola L, Alfi S, Bruni S. Mathematical modelling of the secondary airspring suspension in railway vehicles and its effect on safety and ride comfort[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010,48:429-449.
[69]Durali M, Jalili M M. A new criterion for assessment of train derailment risk [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K:Journal of Multi-body Dynamics,2010,224(1):83-101.
[70]Marquis B, Greif R. Application of Nadal Limit for the Prediction of Wheel Climb Derailment[C]//Proceedings of the ASME/ASCE/IEEE 2011 Joint Rail Conference, Pueblo, CO.2011.
[71]Shabana A. Nadal's Formula and High Speed Rail Derailments [J]. Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics,2012,7(4):1-7.
[72]Jafarian E, Rezvani M A. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for evaluation of railway safety risks:an evaluation of root causes for passenger train derailment [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2012,226(1):14-25.
[73]Opala M. Analysis of Experimental Data in the Context of Safety against Derailment of a Railway Vehicle, Using the Energy Method [J]. Key Engineering Materials,2012,518: 16-23.
[74]Kardas-Cinal E. Spectral Distribution of Derailment Coefficient in Non-Linear Model of Railway Vehicle-Track System with Random Track Irregularities [J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics,2013,8(3):1-9.
[75]Suarez B, Mera J M, Martinez M L, Chover J A. Assessment of the influence of the elastic properties of rail vehicle suspensions on safety, ride quality and track fatigue [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2013,51:280-300.
[76]Brabie D, Andersson E. Dynamic simulation of derailments and its consequences [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2006,44(supl):652-662.
[77]Brabie D. On derailment-worthiness in rail vehicle design:Analysis of vehicle features influencing derailment processes and consequences [D]. Ph.D Thesis, KTH TRITA AVE 2007:78, Stockholm,2007.
[78]Brabie D and Andersson. E, An overview of some high-speed train derailments-means of minimizing consequences based on empirical observations [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2008, 149:441-463.
[79]Brabie D, E. Andersson. Post-derailment dynamic simulations of rail vehicles Methodology and applications [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,49(Suppl.): 289-330.
[80]Brabie D, Andersson E. On minimizing derailment risks and consequences for passenger trains at higher speeds [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2009,223(6):543-566.
[81]Grassie S L, Cox S J. The dynamic response of railway track with unsupported sleepers [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D:Journal of Automobile Engineering,1985,199(2):123-136.
[82]Lundqvist A, Dahlberg T. Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2005,219(2):67-77.
[83]Kaewunruen S, Remennikov A M. Investigation of free vibrations of voided concrete sleepers in railway track system [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2007,221(4):495-507.
[84]Bezin Y, Iwnicki S D, Cavalletti M, et al. An investigation of sleeper voids using a flexible track model integrated with railway multi-body dynamics [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2009, 223(6):597-607.
[85]Recuero M, Escalona L, Shabana A. Finite-element analysis of unsupported sleepers using three-dimensional wheel-rail contact formulation [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K:Journal of Multi-body Dynamics,2011, 225(2):153-165.
[86]Insa R, Salvador P, Inarejos J, et al. Analysis of the influence of under sleeper pads on the railway vehicle/track dynamic interaction in transition zones [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2012, 226(4):409-420.
[87]Ju S H.3D analysis of high-speed trains moving on bridges with foundation settlements [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics,2013,83(2):281-291.
[88]Sawley, K. and Reiff, R. Rail Failure Assessment for the Office of the Rail Regulator, An assessment of Rail track's methods for managing broken and defective rails [R]. Transportation Technology Center, Inc., A subsidiary of the Association of American Railroads, Pueblo, Colorado, USA,2000,1-70.
[89]Gonzalez F J, Suarez B, Paulin J, et al. Safety assessment of underground vehicles passing over highly resilient straight track in the presence of a broken rail [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2008,222(1):69-84.
[90]Suarez B, Rodriguez P, Vazquez M, et al. Safety assessment of underground vehicles passing over highly resilient curved tracks in the presence of a broken rail [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(1):59-78.
[91]Barkan C, Tyler D, Anderson R. Railroad derailment factors affecting hazardous materials transportation risk[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2003,1825(1):64-74.
[92]Smith R. The wheel-rail interface-some recent accidents [J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures,2003,26(10):901-907.
[93]Kumar S. A study of the rail degradation process to predict rail breaks [D]. Ph.D Thesis, Lulea University of Technology,2006.
[94]Sandstrom J, Ekberg A. Predicting crack growth and risks of rail breaks due to wheel flat impacts in heavy haul operations [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2009,223(2):153-161.
[95]Patra A P, Kumar U, Larsson-Kraik P. Assessment and Improvement of Railway Track Safety[C]//Proceedings of 9th International Heavy Haul Conference (IHHA).2009: 22-24.
[96]Zerbst U, Beretta S. Failure and damage tolerance aspects of railway components [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2011,18(2):534-542.
[97]Liu X, Saat M, Barkan C. Analysis of causes of major train derailment and their effect on accident rates [J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2012,2289(1):154-163.
[98]Liu X, Saat M, Qin X, et al. Analysis of US freight-train derailment severity using zero-truncated negative binomial regression and quintile regression [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,59:87-93
[99]Bao Y. Three-dimensional buckling/lateral shift analysis of continuous welded rail (CWR) track and innovative methods to enhance CWR track performance [D]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign,1998.
[100]National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad accident report:derailment of Amtrak auto train P052-18 on the CSXT railroad near Crescent city, Florida, April 18,2002[R]. Report number NTSB/RAR-03/02, National Technical Information, USA,2003.
[101]Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Railway investigation report:main-track derailment Canadian national train Q-120-31-30 mile 46.0, Drummondville subdivision villeroy, Quebec 30, July 2003 [R]. Report number R03Q0036, Canada,2005.
[102]Australian Transport Safety Bureau. ATSB transport safety investigation report: derailment of Pacific National Train 6MP4 Koolyanobbing, Western Australia,30 January,2005, and Pacific National Train 6SP5 Booraan, Western Australia,30 January, 2005[R]. Report number 2005/002, Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Australian, 2006.
[103]Zarembski A, Grissom G, Lees J. Assessing the risk of track buckling:to reduce the risk of track buckles [J]. Railway Track and Structures,2005.
[104]Masayuki, I. A study of track maintenance for the derailment due to the interaction between track and vehicle [J]. Japanese National Railway Technical Research Institute Quarterly Reports,1978,19:1-6.
[105]Cheli F, Corradi R, Diana G, et al. Effect of track geometrical defects on running safety of tramcar vehicles [J]. Vehicle system dynamics,2006,44(sup1):302-312.
[106]Steenbergen M, Esveld C. Relation between the geometry of rail welds and the dynamic wheel-rail response:numerical simulations for measured welds [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2006,220(4):409-423.
[107]Ishida H, Matsuo M, Fujioka T. Safety assessment method of railway vehicle under oscillatory wheel load fluctuation [J]. Journal of environment and engineering,2007, 2(2):407-418.
[108]Mohammadzadeh S, Sangtarashha M, Molatefi H. A novel method to estimate derailment probability due to track geometric irregularities using reliability techniques and advanced simulation methods [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics,2011,81(11): 1621-1637.
[109]Suarez B, Felez J, Antonio Lozano J, et al. Influence of the track quality and of the properties of the wheel-rail rolling contact on vehicle dynamics [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012:1-20.
[110]Choi I Um J H, Lee J S, et al. The influence of track irregularities on the running behavior of high-speed trains [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2013,227(1):94-102.
[111]Baker C J. Ground vehicles in high cross winds Part I:steady aerodynamic forces[J]. Journal of fluids and structures,1991,5(1):69-90.
[112]Baker C J. Ground vehicles in high cross winds part III:The interaction of aerodynamic forces and the vehicle system [J]. Journal of fluids and structures,1991, 5(2):221-241.
[113]Schetz J A. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001,33(1):371-414.
[114]Baker C J, Sterling M. Current and Recent International Work on Railway Aerodynamics[R]. Report Issue number 4, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham,2003.
[115]Carrarini, A. Reliability Based Analysis of the Crosswind Stability of Railway Vehicles [D]. Ph.D Thesis, Technical University Berlin,2006.
[116]Baker C, Cheli F, Orellano A, et al. Cross-wind effects on road and rail vehicles [J]. Vehicle system dynamics,2009,47(8):983-1022.
[117]Carrarini A. Reliability based analysis of the crosswind stability of railway vehicles[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2007,95(7):493-509.
[118]Diedrichs B, Ekequist M, Stichel S, et al. Quasi-static modelling of wheel-rail reactions due to crosswind effects for various types of high-speed rolling stock [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2004, 218(2):133-148.
[119]Diedrichs B, Sima M, Orellano A, et al. Crosswind stability of a high-speed train on a high embankment[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2007,221(2):205-225.
[120]Diedrichs B, Krajnovic S, Berg M. On Tail Vibrations of Very High-Speed Trains Cruising inside Tunnels. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 2008,2(1):51-75.
[121]Baker C J, Robinson C G. The assessment of wind tunnel testing techniques for ground vehicles in cross winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990,33(1):429-438.
[122]Baker C. The simulation of unsteady aerodynamic cross wind forces on trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2010,98(2):88-99.
[123]Baker C, Hemida H, Iwnicki S, et al. Integration of crosswind forces into train dynamic modeling [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2011,225(2):154-164.
[124]Hemida H, Baker C. Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a freight wagon subjected to a crosswind [J]. Computers & Fluids,2010,39(10):1944-1956.
[125]Sterling M, Baker C, Bouferrouk A, et al. An investigation of the aerodynamic admittances and aerodynamic weighting functions of trains [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2009,97(11):512-522.
[126]ChristianWetzel, Claire Yalamas, Carsten Proppe. On the influence of crosswind on the overturning stability of railway. PAMM.2007,7(1):19-20.
[127]Carsten Proppe, Christian Wetzel. A probabilistic approach for assessing the crosswind stability of ground vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010, Vol.48:411-428.
[128]Cheli F, Belforte P, Melzi S, et al. Numerical-experimental approach for evaluating cross-wind aerodynamic effects on heavy vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2006, 44(sup1):791-804.
[129]Cheli F, Ripamonti F, Rocchi D, et al. Aerodynamic behaviour investigation of the new EMUV250 train to cross wind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2010,98(4):189-201.
[130]Tomasini G, Cheli F. Admittance function to evaluate aerodynamic loads on vehicles: Experimental data and numerical model [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures,2013.
[131]Gawthorpe R G. Wind effects on ground transportation [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1994,52:73-92.
[132]Chiu T W. Prediction of the aerodynamic loads on a railway train in a cross-wind at large yaw angles using an integrated two-and three-dimensional source/vortex panel method [J]. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics,1995,57(1): 19-39.
[133]Orellano A, Schober M. On side-wind stability of high-speed trains [J]. Vehicle system dynamics,2003,40:143-159.
[134]Thomas D, Berg M, Stichel S. Measurements and simulations of rail vehicle dynamics with respect to overturning risk [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010,48(1):97-112.
[135]Kozmar H, Butler K, Kareem A. Transient cross-wind aerodynamic loads on a generic vehicle due to bora gusts [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012,111:73-84.
[136]Fujii T, Maeda T, Ishida H, et al. Wind-Induced Accidents of Train/Vehicles and Their Measures in Japan[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,1999,40(1):50-55.
[137]Imai T, Fujii T, Tanemoto K, et al. New train regulation method based on wind direction and velocity of natural wind against strong winds [J]. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics,2002,90(12):1601-1610.
[138]Fukuhara T, Imai T. Evaluation Method of Train Operation Control under Gales Considering Temporal Fluctuations of Wind Velocity [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2007,48(3):148-152.
[139]Imai T, Araki K, Fukuhara T. A Method to Estimate the Probability of a Train Encountering Gusts in an Operating Section [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2009,50(4): 222-226.
[140]Hibino Y, Ishida H. Static Analysis on Railway Vehicle Overturning under Crosswind [J]. RTRI Report,2003,17(4):39-44.
[141]Xu Y L, Ding Q S. Interaction of railway vehicles with track in cross-winds [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures,2006,22(3):295-314.
[142]Nagase K, Kondo K, Nomura T. Train damaged by the quake in Kobe [J]. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Serial C,1997,63(606):300-307.
[143]Miyamoto T, Ishida H, Matsuo M. Running safety of railway vehicle as earthquake occurs[J]. Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports,1997,38(3): 117-122
[144]Miyamoto T, Matsumoto N, Sogabe M, et al. Full-scale Experiment on the Dynamic Behavior of Railway Vehicles against Heavy Track Vibration[J]. Journal of Environment and Engineering,2007,2(2):419-428.
[145]Miyamoto T, Ishida H. Numerical Analysis Focusing on the Running Safety of an Improved Bogie during Seismic Vibration [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2008,49(3): 173-177.
[146]Iida K, Suzuki M, Miyamoto T, et al. Development of a Lateral Damper to Improve the Running Safety of Railway Vehicles during an Earthquake [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2012,53(1):34-40.
[147]Railway Technical Research Institute, ed. Design standard for railway structures (Seismic designs) (In Japanese), Maruzen,1999:117-122.
[148]Nishimura K, Terumichi Y, Morimura T, et al. Development of vehicle dynamics simulation for safety analyses of rail vehicles on excited tracks [J]. Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics,2009,4(1):1-9.
[149]Nishimura K, Terumichi Y, Morimura T, et al. Experimental study on the vehicle safety by earthquake track excitation with 1/10 scale vehicle and roller rig[J]. Journal of System Design and Dynamics,2010,4(1):226-238.
[150]Nishimura K, Terumichi Y, Morimura T, et al. Analytical Study on the Safety of High Speed Railway Vehicle on Excited Tracks [J]. Journal of System Design and Dynamics, 2010,4(1):211-225.
[151]Tanabe M, Matsumoto N, Wakui H, et al. A simple and efficient numerical method for dynamic interaction analysis of a high-speed train and railway structure during an earthquake [J]. Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics,2008,3(4):1-8.
[152]Tanabe M, Matsumoto N, Wakui H, et al. Simulation of a Shinkansen train on the railway structure during an earthquake [J]. Japan journal of industrial and applied mathematics,2011,28(1):223-236.
[153]Yang Y B, Wu Y S. Dynamic stability of trains moving over bridges shaken by earthquakes [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2002,258(1):65-94.
[154]Wu Y. Dynamic interactions of train-rail-bridge system under normal and seismic conditions [D]. Ph.D Thesis, National Taiwan University, China,2000.
[155]Ju S H, Li H C. Dynamic interaction analysis of trains moving on embankments during earthquakes [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2011,330(22):5322-5332.
[156]Ju S H. Nonlinear analysis of high-speed trains moving on bridges during earthquakes [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics,2012,69(1-2):173-183.
[157]Luo X. Study on methodology for running safety assessment of trains in seismic design of railway structures [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2005,25(2): 79-91.
[158]Yang J, Li J B, Lin G. A simple approach to integration of acceleration data for dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis [J]. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering,2006,26(8):725-734.
[159]Kim C W, Kawatani M, Lee C H, et al. Seismic response of a monorail bridge incorporating train-bridge interaction [J]. Structural engineering and mechanics,2007, 26(2):111-126.
[160]Fryba L, Yau J D. Suspended bridges subjected to moving loads and support motions due to earthquake [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2009,319(1):218-227.
[161]Yau J D. Dynamic response analysis of suspended beams subjected to moving vehicles and multiple support excitations [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2009,325(4): 907-922.
[162]Matsuura A. Simulation for Analyzing Direct Derailment Limit of Running Vehicle on Oscillating Tracks [J]. Structural Engineering Earthquake Engineering,1998,15: 63s-72s.
[163]Matsumoto N, Sogabe M, Wakui H, et al. Running safety analysis of vehicles on structures subjected to earthquake motion [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2004,45(3): 116-122.
[164]Kim C W, Kawatani M. Effect of train dynamics on seismic response of steel monorail bridges under moderate ground motion [J]. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics,2006,35(10):1225-1245.
[165]Xu G, Troger H, Steindl A. Global analysis of the loss of stability of a special railway bogy[M]. Nonlinear Dynamics in Engineering Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1990:345-353.
[166]Ahmadian M, Yang S. Effect of system nonlinearities on locomotive bogie hunting stability [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1998,29(6):365-384.
[167]Polach O. On non-linear methods of bogie stability assessment using computer simulations [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2006,220(1):13-27.
[168]Fan Y T, Wu W F. Stability analysis and derailment evaluation of rail vehicles [J]. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems,2006,13(3):194-211.
[169]Lee S Y, Cheng Y C. Nonlinear analysis on hunting stability for high-speed railway vehicle trucks on curved tracks [J]. Journal of vibration and acoustics,2005,127(4): 324-332.
[170]Kim P, Seok J. Bifurcation analysis on the hunting behavior of a dual-bogie railway vehicle using the method of multiple scales [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2010, 329(19):4017-4039.
[171]Abood K H A, Khan R A. Hunting phenomenon study of railway conventional truck on tangent tracks due to change in rail wheel geometry [J]. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology,2011,6(2):146-160.
[172]Wang F C, Hsieh M R, Chen H J. Stability and performance analysis of a full-train system with inverters[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(4):545-571.
[173]Xue-jun G, Ying-hui L, Yuan Y, et al. Symmetric/asymmetric bifurcation behaviours of a bogie system [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2012.
[174]Han H S, Koo J S. Simulation of train crashes in three dimensions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2003,40(6):435-450.
[175]Koo J S, Cho H J. A method to predict the derailment of rolling stock due to collision using a theoretical wheelset derailment model [J]. Multibody System Dynamics,2012, 27(4):403-422.
[176]Zhou H, Wang W, Hecht M. Three-dimensional override analysis of crashed railway multiple units [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(4):663-674.
[177]Zhou H, Wang W, Hecht M. Three-dimensional derailment analysis of a crashed city tram [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2013. dx.doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.790553
[178]Stringfellow R, Rancatore R, Liana P, et al. Analysis of colliding vehicle interactions for the passenger rail train-to-train impact test[C]//Rail Conference,2004. Proceedings of the 2004 ASME/IEEE Joint. IEEE,2004:11-18.
[179]Sun Y Q, Cole C, Dhanasekar M, et al. Modelling and analysis of the crush zone of a typical Australian passenger train [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(7): 1137-1155.
[180]杨国桢.铁道车辆脱轨安全性的设计(上、下)[J].铁道车辆,1974,11：8-26；12：12-32.
[181]杨国桢.二轴转向架脱轨安全性的研究[J].铁道学报,1979,2：12-24.
[182]郭荣生.铁道车辆在曲线上脱轨问题的基本轮轨关系-轮对的导向能力[J].铁道车辆,1981,1：9-17.
[183]李富达,黄建苒,樊建民,张京军.小半径曲线上棚车脱轨安全性研究[J].中国铁道科学,1986,2：35-50.
[184]陈光雄,罗资.轮对脱轨判断原理的初步分析[J].铁道车辆,1990,8：13-18.
[185]陈光雄,鲍维千.缓和曲线上周期性线路不平顺对车辆脱轨的影响[J].铁道车辆, 2000,38(4)：1-5.
[186]张卫华,薛弼一,吴学杰,胡柳嘉.单轮对脱轨试验及其理论分析[J].铁道学报,1998,20(1)：39-44.
[187]曾京.车辆系统的蛇行运动分叉及极限环的数值计算[J].铁道学报,1996,18(3)：13-19.
[188]Wu P, Zeng J. Dynamic analysis for derailment safety of railway vehicles [J]. Safety Science and Technology,1998:292-299.
[189]Zeng, J and Wu, P. Stability Analysis of High Speed Railway Vehicles [J]. JSME International Journal,2004,47(2):464-470.
[190]曾京.轮对稳态脱轨准则的研究[J].铁道学报,1999,21(6)：15-19.
[191]曾京,关庆华.铁道车辆运行安全评判的轮对爬轨脱轨准则[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(6)：1-5.
[192]关庆华.列车脱轨机理及运行安全性研究[D].成都：西南交通大学博士学位论文,2010.
[193]俞展猷.防脱轨性能的评定[J].机车电传动,1999,(5)：1-5.
[194]俞展猷,李富达,李谷.车轮脱轨及其评价[J].铁道学报,1999,21(3)：33-38.
[195]曾宇清,王卫东,舒兴高,于卫东.车辆脱轨安全评判的动态限度[J].中国铁道科学,1999,20(4)：70-76.
[196]沈钢,王福天.轮对蛇行失稳导致脱轨的机理研究[J].上海铁道大学学报,2000,21(8)：1-6.
[197]Knothe K L, Grassie S L. Modeling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1993,22:209-262.
[198]翟婉明,陈果.根据车轮抬升量评判车辆脱轨的方法与准则[J].铁道学报,2001,23(2)：17-26.
[199]曾庆元,向俊,娄平.车桥及车轨时变系统横向振动计算中的根本问题与列车脱轨能量随机分析理论[J].中国铁道科学,2002,01：3-12.
[200]向俊.列车脱轨机理与脱轨分析理论研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2006.
[201]周智辉.列车脱轨分析理论与控制脱轨的桥梁横向刚度限值研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2007.
[202]Xiang J, Zeng Q, Lou P. Transverse vibration of train-bridge and train-track time varying system and the theory of random energy analysis for train derailment [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2004,41(2):129-155.
[203]肖新标.轨道运动对列车脱轨影响的研究初探[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[204]肖新标,金学松,温泽峰.钢轨扣件失效对列车动态脱轨的影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2006,6(1)：10-15.
[205]肖新标,温泽峰,金学松.轨下支承失效对车辆系统动态响应及乘坐舒适度的影响[J].铁道学报,2007,06：26-33.
[206]肖新标,金学松,温泽峰.轨枕支撑硬点对轨枕动力响应的影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,06：28-35.
[207]肖新标,金学松,温泽峰.轨下支承失效对直线轨道动态响应的影响[J].力学学报,2008,40(1)：67-78.
[208]邓永权,肖新标,肖广文.横风作用时间对高速客车直线运行安全性的影响[J].铁道机车车辆,2008,05：1-5.
[209]金学松,凌亮,肖新标,朱曼昊,周仲荣.复杂环境下高速列车动态行为数值仿真和运行安全域分析[J].计算机辅助工程,2011,20(3)：29-41.
[210]凌亮,肖新标,吴磊,金学松.地震激励下高速列车动态响应与运行安全边界研[J].铁道学报,2012,10：16-22.
[211]凌亮,肖新标,吴磊,金学松.地震波频谱特性对高速列车动态脱轨行为的影响[J].工程力学,2013,01：384-393.
[212]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Wen Zefeng. Effect of disabled fastening systems and ballast on vehicle derailment [J]. Journal of vibration and acoustics,2007,129(2): 217-229.
[213]Xiao Xinbiao, Wen Zefeng, Jin Xuesong, et al. Effects of track support failures on dynamic response of high speed tracks [J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation,2007,8(4):615.
[214]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Deng Yongquan, et al. Effect of curved track support failure on vehicle derailment [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,46(11):1029-1059.
[215]Zhang Shuguang, Xiao Xinbiao, Wen Zefeng, et al. Effect of unsupported sleepers on wheel/rail normal load [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2008,28(8): 662-673.
[216]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Wen Zefeng, Minhao Zhu. Effect of crosswind on high speed railway vehicle running safety[C]//International Symposium on Speed-up, Safety and Service Technology for Railway and Maglev Systems 2009 (STECH'09). Niigata Japan,2009.
[217]Deng Yongquan, Xiao Xinbiao. Effect of Cross-Wind on High-Speed Vehicle Dynamic Derailment. Logistics:The Emerging Frontiers of Transportation and Development in China,2009,2287-2293.
[218]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Wen Zefeng, et al. Effect of tangent track buckle on vehicle derailment [J]. Multibody System Dynamics,2011,25(1):1-41.
[219]Jin Xuesong, Xiao Xinbiao, Ling Liang. Study on the safety boundary for high speed trains in severe environments[C]//Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on High-Speed and Intercity Railways. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2012:201-224.
[220]Xiao Xinbiao, Ling Liang, Jin Xuesong. A study of the derailment mechanism of a high speed train due to an earthquake [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(3): 449-470.
[221]Jin Xuesong, Xiao Xinbiao, Ling Liang, et al. Study on safety boundary for high-speed train running in severe environments [J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2013,1(1-2):87-108.
[222]向俊,杨桦,赫丹.轨枕悬空条件下的列车-轨道系统竖向振动响应研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2007,01：8-12.
[223]翁长根,赫丹,王阳,向俊.扣件失效对城市轨道交通列车-浮置板式轨道系统竖向振动响应的影响[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2008,02：29-33.
[224]向俊,赫丹,曾庆元.水泥沥青砂浆劣化对板式轨道动力学性能的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,03：791-796.
[225]吴磊.地铁车辆-钢弹簧浮置板轨道耦合动态行为的研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2012.
[226]石玮荃.高速铁路板式轨道结构缺陷对动力学性能的影响分析[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2011.
[227]潘春花.地铁车辆悬挂系统的参数优化及失效分析[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2012.
[228]朱剑月.轨下扣件支承失效对轨道结构动力性能的影响[J].振动工程学报,2011,02：158-163.
[229]朱剑月,张艳.轨枕吊空对轨道结构动力性能的影响[J].中国铁道科学,2011,03：8-15.
[230]王伟.高速车辆脱轨非线性动力学及其动态仿真[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文,2010.
[231]田红旗.列车空气动力学[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2007.
[232]高广军.强侧风作用下列车运行安全性研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2008.
[233]向俊,彭铁光,赫丹,曾京.横风作用下高速列车-板式轨道系统空间振动分[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2009,6(4)：1-5.
[234]陈锐林.强风作用下列车脱轨分析[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2008.
[235]任尊松,徐宇工,王璐雷,邱英政.强侧风对高速列车运行安全性影响研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(6)：46-50.
[236]崔涛.高速列车流固耦合振动及运行安全性研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2011.
[237]郗艳红.横风作用下的高速列车气动特性及运行安全性研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2012.
[238]郗艳红,毛军,高亮,杨国伟,曲文强.横风作用下高速列车安全运行速度限值的研究[J].铁道学报,2012,06：8-14.
[239]李人宪,翟婉明.磁悬浮列车横风稳定性的数值分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2001,01：99-101.
[240]黄林.列车风与自然风联合作用下的车-桥耦合振动分析[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2007.
[241]凌知民,高碧波,项海帆.横风对货车通过高墩桥梁行车安全性的影响分析[J].铁道学报,2007,04：80-86.
[242]姚应峰.横风作用下200km／h动车组安全性研究[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[243]许士军.横风环境下动车组倾覆稳定性研究[D].中南大学硕士学位论文,2009.
[244]崔景魁.强侧风环境下铁路客运列车速度限值研究[D].中南大学硕士学位论文,2009.
[245]杨吉忠.考虑空气动力效应时高速列车运行安全平稳性研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2010.
[246]于梦阁.高速列车风致安全研究[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[247]苗秀娟.瞬态风荷载下的列车运行安全性研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2012.
[248]夏禾,张楠.车辆与结构动力相互作用(第二版)口咽.北京：科学出版社,2005.
[249]张楠,夏禾.地震对多跨简支梁桥上列车运行安全的影响[J].世界地震工程,2001,04：93-99.
[250]韩艳.地震作用下高速铁路桥梁的动力响应及行车安全性研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2005.
[251]杜宪亭.强地震作用下大跨度桥梁空间动力效应及列车运行安全研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2011.
[252]王开云,王少林,杨久川,王慎.地震环境下铁路轮轨动态安全性能及脱轨研究进展[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,06：82-94.
[253]熊建珍,高芒芒,俞翰斌.天兴洲长江大桥斜拉桥在地震作用下的车-桥耦合振动分析[J].中国铁道科学,2006,27(5)：54-59.
[254]谭长建,祝兵.地震作用下高速列车与桥梁耦合振动分析[J].振动与冲击,2009,01：4-8.
[255]林玉森.地震作用下高速铁路桥上列车行走性研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2007.
[256]张志超.车桥系统耦合振动和地震响应的随机分析[D].大连理工大学博士学位论文,2010.
[257]陈令坤.地震作用下高速铁路列车-无砟轨道-桥梁系统动力响应及走行安全研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2012.
[258]王少林,翟婉明.地震作用下高速列车-线路-桥梁系统动力响应[J].西南交通大学学报,2011,01：56-62.
[259]徐鹏.列车-轨道-路基耦合振动及地震条件下行车安全性分析[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2012.
[260]杨坤.城市高架桥简支梁在地震作用下轨道列车响应及运行的安全性分析[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[261]彭荣华,王柳,郭向荣.横向地震激励下的悬索桥车-桥耦合动力响应分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2012,04：19-24.
[262]Jin Xuesong, Wu PingBo, Wen Zefeng. Effect of structure elastic deformations of wheelset and track on creep forces of wheel/rail in rolling contact[J]. Wear,2002,253: 247-256.
[263]金学松,刘启跃.轮轨摩擦学[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2004.
[264]Saito M. Japanese railway safety and the technology of the day[J]. Japan Railway & Transport Review,2002,33:4-13.
[265]张卫华.动车组总体与转向架[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2011.
[266]刘宏友.高速列车中的关键动力学问题研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2003.
[267]陈凯,陈海.铁道车辆车端阻尼装置[J].国外铁道车辆,2004,41(4)：5-12.
[268]Zhai Wanming, Cai Chengbiao, Guo Shizhang. Coupling model of vertical and lateral vehicle/track interactions [J]. Vehicle system Dynamics,1996,26:61-79.
[269]Dong R G. Vertical dynamics of railway vehicle-track system [M]. Ph.D thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,1994.
[270]Steffens D. Identification and Development of a Model of Railway Track Dynamic Behaviour [M]. Queensland University of Technology, Queenslan,2005.
[271]Cai Z Q. Modeling of rail track dynamics and wheel/rail interaction [M]. Ph.D thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada,1992.
[272]Sun Y Q. Dhanasekar, M. A dynamic model for the vertical interaction of the rail track and wagon system[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,2002,39: 1337-1359.
[273]屈维德,唐恒龄.机械振动手册(第二版)[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000.
[274]Timoshenko S. Vibration Problems in Engineering (Fourth Edition) [M]. John Wiley& Sons, Inc., USA,1974.
[275]徐志胜,翟婉明,王开云.基于Timoshenko梁模型的车辆-轨道耦合振动分析[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(1)：22-27.
[276]Newton S G. An investigation into the dynamic effects on the track of wheelflats on railway vehicles [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,1979,21:287-297.
[277]倪振华.振动力学[M].西安：西安交通大学出版社,1988.
[278]Grassie S, Gregory R, Harrison D, Johnson K. The dynamic response of railway track to high frequency vertical/lateral/longitudinal excitation [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,1982,24(22):77-102.
[279]Popp K, Kruse H, Kaiser I. Vehicle-track dynamics in the mid-frequency range [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1999,31(5-6):423-464.
[280]Craig R. Structural dynamics-an introduction to computer methods [M]. John Wiley & Sons, New York,1981.
[281]颜云辉,谢里阳,韩清凯.结构分析中的有限单元法及其应用[M].沈阳：东北大学出版社,2000.
[282]朱伯芳.有限单元法原理与应用(第三版)[M].北京：中国水利水电出版社,2009.
[283]温泽峰.轮轨结构弹性变形对轮轨滚动接触力学行为的影响[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,1997.
[284]温泽峰,金学松.轮轨结构变形对高速机车单轮对牵引力矩的影响[J].铁道学报,2001,23(4)：21-26.
[285]温泽峰,金学松.轮轨结构横向变形对轮轨滚动接触蠕滑力的影响[J].机械强度,2002,24(3)：383-387.
[286]Bezin Y, Iwnicki S D, Cavalletti M. The effect of dynamic rail roll on the wheel-rail contact conditions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,46(S1):107-117.
[287]王开云,翟婉明,蔡成标.钢轨扭转运动对轮轨动态相互作用的影响[J].中国铁道科学,2008,29(3)：68-72.
[288]陈果,翟婉明,左洪福.新型轮轨空间动态耦合模型[J].振动工程学报,2001,14(4)：402-408.
[289]Chen G, Zhai W M. A New Wheel Rail Spatially Dynamic Coupling Model and its Verification[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2004,41(4):301-322.
[290]Kalker J J. On the rolling contact of two elastic bodies in the presence of dry friction[D]. Ph.D thesis, Delft University, Netherland,1967
[291]Vermeulen P J, Johnson K L. Contact of non-spherical bodies transmitting tangential forces [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics,1964,31:338-340
[292]Shen Z Y, Hedrick J K, Elkins J A. A comparison of alternative creep force models for rail vehicle dynamic analysis [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1983,12(1-3):79-83.
[293]Kalker J J. Simplified theory of rolling contact[J]. Delft Progress Report,1973,1(1): 1-10.
[294]Kalker J J. Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact [M]. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands,1990.
[295]Baeza L, Ouyang H. A railway track dynamics model based on modal substructuring and a cyclic boundary condition [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2011,330(1): 75-86.
[296]铁运[2008]28号,高速动车组整车试验规范[S].中国铁道部,2008.
[297]Railway Group Standard, Resistance of railway vehicles to roll-over in Gales [S]. GM/RT2142, Railway Group Standard,2009.
[298]GB／T 17742-2008.中国地震烈度表[S].北京：中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局／中国国家标准化管理委员会,2008.
[2]中国铁道部.中长期铁路网规划(2008年调整)[R].北京,2008.
[3]金学松,郭俊,肖新标,温泽峰,周仲荣.高速列车安全运行研究的关键科学问题[J].工程力学,2009,26(S2)：8-22.
[4]Brabie D. On the influence of rail vehicle parameters on the derailment process and its consequences [D]. Licentiate Thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden,2005.
[5]史密斯.钢轨滚动接触疲劳的进一步研究[J].中国铁道科学,2002,23(3)：6-10.
[6]Magel E, Roney M, Kalousek J, Sroba P. The blending of theory and practice in modern rail grinding [J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials& Structures.2003, 26(10):921-929.
[7]ERRI. Special earthquake report-preliminary observation on the Niigata Ken Chuetsu[R], Japan, earthquake of 23 October 2004, Journal 2005.
[8]Schetz J A. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001,33(1):371-414.
[9]Iwnicki S. Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics [M]. Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 2006.
[10]翟婉明.车辆-轨道耦合动力学(第三版)[M].北京：科学出版社,2007.
[11]曾庆元,向俊,周智辉,娄平.列车脱轨分析理论与应用[M].长沙：中南大学出版社.
[12]Nadal M J. Theorie de stabilit'e des Locomotives, part 2, Mouvement de Lacet[J]. Annales des Mines,1896,10:232.
[13]Weinstock H. Wheel climb derailment criteria for evaluation of rail vehicle safety [C]//Proceedings of the ASME winter annual meeting.1984,84:1-7.
[14]Yokose K. A theory of the derailment of wheelset [J]. Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports,1966,7(3):30-34.
[15]Gilchrist A, Brickle B. A re-examination of the proneness to derailment of a railway wheelset [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,1976,18(3):134-141.
[16]Koci H, Swenson C. Locomotive wheel-rail loading-A systems approach[C]// Proceedings of the Heavy Haul Railway Conference. Perth, Western Australia,1978.
[17]Shust W, Thompson R, Elkins J. Controlled wheel climb derailment tests using a force measuring wheelset and AAR's track loading vehicle[C]//Proceeding of 12th International Wheelset Congress. Qingdao, China,1998.
[18]铁道部科学研究院.环形线货物列车直线段脱轨试验研究报告[R].北京：铁道部科学研究院,2000.
[19]Matsudaira T. Dynamics of high speed rolling stock[J]. Japanese National Railways RTRI Quarterly Reports, Special issue,1963.
[20]001. AAR Mechanical Division, Manual of standards and recommended practices, section c-part Ⅱ, volume 1, Chapter XI, section 11.5.2 Track-Worthiness Criteria[S]. Adopted 1987, Revised 1993.
[21]Federal Railroad Administration. Track safety standards, part 213, subpart G[S]. September,1998.
[22]Wu H, Elkins J. Investigation of wheel flange climb derailment criteria[R]. Association of American Railroads Report R-931,1999.
[23]Elkins J, Wu H. New criteria for flange climb derailment[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference. Newark, NJ, April 4-6,2000:1-7.
[24]曾宇清,王卫东,舒兴高,于卫东.车辆脱轨安全评判的动态限度[J].中国铁道科学,1999,20(4)：70-77.
[25]薛弼一.脱轨机理及试验研究[D].成都：西南交通大学博士学位论文,1998.
[26]Zeng Jing, Guan Qinghua. Study on flange climb derailment criteria of a railway wheelset[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,46(3):239-251.
[27]GB 5599-85.铁道车辆动力学性能评定和试验鉴定规范[S].北京：中国计划出版社,1985.
[28]Miyamoto M. Mechanism of derailment phenomena of railway vehicles[J]. QR of RTRI, 1996,37(3):147-155.
[29]翟婉明,陈果.根据车轮抬升量评判车辆脱轨的方法与准则[J].铁道学报,2001,23(2)：17-26.
[30]Xiang J, Zeng Q. A study on mechanical mechanism of train derailment and preventive measures for derailment [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2005,43(2):121-147.
[31]Elkins J, Carter A. Testing and analysis techniques for safety assessment of rail vehicles: the state-of-the-art [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1993,22(3-4):185-208.
[32]Wilson N, Fries R, Witte M, Haigermoser A, Wrang M, Evans J, Orlova A. Assessment of safety against derailment using simulations and vehicle acceptance tests:a worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2011, 49(7):1113-1157.
[33]Nagase K, Wakabayashi Y, Sakahara H. A study of the phenomenon of wheel climb derailment:results of basic experiments using model bogies [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2002, 216(4):237-247.
[34]Kanehara H, Ohno K. Development of a continuous measuring system for contact position between wheel and rail toward clarification of derailment mechanism [J]. JR East Technical Review,2003 (2).
[35]Braghin F, Bruni S, Diana G. Experimental and numerical investigation on the derailment of a railway wheelset with solid axle [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2006, 44:305-325.
[36]E1 Ouali M, Cloupet S, Chollet H, Ayasse JB, Chevalier L, Courteille D. Experimental tests and numerical simulations of railway vehicles at low speed in derailment conditions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2008,46:1013-1021.
[37]Doumiati M, Victorino A, Charara A, Lechner D. Lateral load transfer and normal forces estimation for vehicle safety:experimental test [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2009, 47:1511-1533.
[38]Eom B G, Kang B B, Lee H S. A study on running stability assessment methods for 1/5 small scaled bogie of saemaul using small-scaled derailment simulator [J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,2013,14(4):589-598.
[39]Wu H. Investigation of wheel rail interaction on wheel flange climb derailment and wheel rail profile compatibility [D]. Ph.D Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology,2000.
[40]Kik W, Menssen R, Moelle D, Bergander B, Vincent. Comparison of results of calculations and measurements of DYSAF-test, a research project to investigate safety limits of derailment at high speeds [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2002,37(suppl.): 543-553.
[41]Parena D, Kuka N, Masmoudi W, Kik W. Derailment simulation parametric study [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1999,33(suppl):155-167.
[42]Clementson J, Evans J. The use of dynamic simulation in the investigation of derailment incidents [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2002,37(suppl.):338-349.
[43]Eom B G, Lee H S. Assessment of running safety of railway vehicles using multibody dynamics [J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,2010, 11(2):315-320.
[44]Sweet L M, Karmel A, Moy P. Wheelset Derailment Criteria under Steady Rolling and Lateral Impact Conditions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1979,8:229-234.
[45]Sweet L M, Karmel A, Fairley SR. Derailment Mechanics and Safety Criteria for Complete Rail Vehicle Trucks [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1981,10:203-206.
[46]Sweet L M, Karmel A, Budell R, Lassman D, Schulte D. Theory and Measurement of Derailment Quotients[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 1983,12:177-178.
[47]Rismantab-Sany J. Another look at the single wheel derailment criteria[C]//Railroad Conference,1996, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME/IEEE Joint. IEEE,1996:17-22.
[48]Ishida H, Matsuo M. Safety Criteria for Evaluation of Railway Vehicle Derailment [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,1999,40(1):18-25.
[49]Ishida H, Miyamoto T, Maebashi E, et al. Safety assessment for flange climb derailment of trains running at low speeds on sharp curves [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2006, 47(2):65-71.
[50]Ohno K. Research and development for eliminating wheel climb derailment accidents[J]. JR East Technical Review,2003 (2).
[51]Sato Y, Matsumoto A, Ohno H, et al. Wheel/rail contact analysis of tramways and LRVs against derailment [J]. Wear,2008,265(9):1460-1464.
[52]Magel E, Tajaddini A, Trosino M, et al. Traction, forces, wheel climb and damage in high-speed railway operations [J]. Wear,2008,265(9):1446-1451.
[53]Hung C, Suda Y, Aki M, et al. Study on detection of the early signs of derailment for railway vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010,48(S1):451-466.
[54]Mohammadzadeh S, Sangtarashha M, Molatefi H. A novel method to estimate derailment probability due to track geometric irregularities using reliability techniques and advanced simulation methods [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics,2011,81(11): 1621-1637.
[55]Miyamoto T, Suzumura J, Nakahashi J, et al. Change in Surface Condition of Turned Wheel and Effectiveness of Lubrication against Flange Climb Derailment[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2012,53(2):70-76.
[56]Barbosa R S. A 3D contact force safety criterion for flange climb derailment of a railway wheel [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2004,42(5):289-300.
[57]Barbosa R S. Safety of a railway wheelset-derailment simulation with increasing lateral force [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2009,47(12):1493-1510.
[58]Shust W C, Elkins J A. Wheel forces during flange climb. I. Track loading vehicle tests[C]//Railroad Conference,1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/ASME Joint. IEEE, 1997:137-147.
[59]Elkins J A, Shust W C. Wheel forces during flange climb. Ⅱ. NUCARS simulations[C]// Railroad Conference,1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/ASME Joint. IEEE,1997: 149-156.
[60]Wu H, Elkins J. Investigation of wheel flange climb derailment criteria [J]. Report R-931, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC,1999,7.
[61]Wu H, Shu X, Wilson N. Track-Related Research:Volume 5:Flange Climb Derailment Criteria And Wheel/Rail Profile Management And Maintenance Guidelines For Transit Operations [M]. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies,2005.
[62]Shu X, Wilson N, Wu H, et al. A bi-parameter distance criterion for flange climb derailment[C]//Rail Conference,2005. Proceedings of the 2005 ASME/IEEE Joint. IEEE,2005:9-17.
[63]Shu X, Wilson N. Simulation of dynamic gauge widening and rail roll:effects on derailment and rolling contact fatigue [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2008,46:981-994.
[64]Matej J, Piotrowski J, Wojtyra M, et al. Modelling and safety examination of the long bimodal train on curved track using ADAMS/RAIL[C]//Proceedings of the 1st MSC. ADAMS European User Conference (CDROM).2002.
[65]Boronenko Y, Orlova A, Iofan A, Galperin S. Effects that appear during the derailment of one wheelset in the freight wagon:simulation and testing [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2006,44:663-668.
[66]Santamaria J, Vadillo E G, Gomez J. Influence of creep forces on the risk of derailment of railway vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2009,47(6):721-752.
[67]Schindler C, Schwickert M, Simonis A. Structural safety of trams in case of misguidance in a switch [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2010,48:967-981.
[68]Facchinetti A, Mazzola L, Alfi S, Bruni S. Mathematical modelling of the secondary airspring suspension in railway vehicles and its effect on safety and ride comfort[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010,48:429-449.
[69]Durali M, Jalili M M. A new criterion for assessment of train derailment risk [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K:Journal of Multi-body Dynamics,2010,224(1):83-101.
[70]Marquis B, Greif R. Application of Nadal Limit for the Prediction of Wheel Climb Derailment[C]//Proceedings of the ASME/ASCE/IEEE 2011 Joint Rail Conference, Pueblo, CO.2011.
[71]Shabana A. Nadal's Formula and High Speed Rail Derailments [J]. Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics,2012,7(4):1-7.
[72]Jafarian E, Rezvani M A. Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for evaluation of railway safety risks:an evaluation of root causes for passenger train derailment [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2012,226(1):14-25.
[73]Opala M. Analysis of Experimental Data in the Context of Safety against Derailment of a Railway Vehicle, Using the Energy Method [J]. Key Engineering Materials,2012,518: 16-23.
[74]Kardas-Cinal E. Spectral Distribution of Derailment Coefficient in Non-Linear Model of Railway Vehicle-Track System with Random Track Irregularities [J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics,2013,8(3):1-9.
[75]Suarez B, Mera J M, Martinez M L, Chover J A. Assessment of the influence of the elastic properties of rail vehicle suspensions on safety, ride quality and track fatigue [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics 2013,51:280-300.
[76]Brabie D, Andersson E. Dynamic simulation of derailments and its consequences [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2006,44(supl):652-662.
[77]Brabie D. On derailment-worthiness in rail vehicle design:Analysis of vehicle features influencing derailment processes and consequences [D]. Ph.D Thesis, KTH TRITA AVE 2007:78, Stockholm,2007.
[78]Brabie D and Andersson. E, An overview of some high-speed train derailments-means of minimizing consequences based on empirical observations [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2008, 149:441-463.
[79]Brabie D, E. Andersson. Post-derailment dynamic simulations of rail vehicles Methodology and applications [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,49(Suppl.): 289-330.
[80]Brabie D, Andersson E. On minimizing derailment risks and consequences for passenger trains at higher speeds [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2009,223(6):543-566.
[81]Grassie S L, Cox S J. The dynamic response of railway track with unsupported sleepers [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D:Journal of Automobile Engineering,1985,199(2):123-136.
[82]Lundqvist A, Dahlberg T. Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2005,219(2):67-77.
[83]Kaewunruen S, Remennikov A M. Investigation of free vibrations of voided concrete sleepers in railway track system [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2007,221(4):495-507.
[84]Bezin Y, Iwnicki S D, Cavalletti M, et al. An investigation of sleeper voids using a flexible track model integrated with railway multi-body dynamics [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2009, 223(6):597-607.
[85]Recuero M, Escalona L, Shabana A. Finite-element analysis of unsupported sleepers using three-dimensional wheel-rail contact formulation [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K:Journal of Multi-body Dynamics,2011, 225(2):153-165.
[86]Insa R, Salvador P, Inarejos J, et al. Analysis of the influence of under sleeper pads on the railway vehicle/track dynamic interaction in transition zones [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2012, 226(4):409-420.
[87]Ju S H.3D analysis of high-speed trains moving on bridges with foundation settlements [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics,2013,83(2):281-291.
[88]Sawley, K. and Reiff, R. Rail Failure Assessment for the Office of the Rail Regulator, An assessment of Rail track's methods for managing broken and defective rails [R]. Transportation Technology Center, Inc., A subsidiary of the Association of American Railroads, Pueblo, Colorado, USA,2000,1-70.
[89]Gonzalez F J, Suarez B, Paulin J, et al. Safety assessment of underground vehicles passing over highly resilient straight track in the presence of a broken rail [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2008,222(1):69-84.
[90]Suarez B, Rodriguez P, Vazquez M, et al. Safety assessment of underground vehicles passing over highly resilient curved tracks in the presence of a broken rail [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(1):59-78.
[91]Barkan C, Tyler D, Anderson R. Railroad derailment factors affecting hazardous materials transportation risk[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2003,1825(1):64-74.
[92]Smith R. The wheel-rail interface-some recent accidents [J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures,2003,26(10):901-907.
[93]Kumar S. A study of the rail degradation process to predict rail breaks [D]. Ph.D Thesis, Lulea University of Technology,2006.
[94]Sandstrom J, Ekberg A. Predicting crack growth and risks of rail breaks due to wheel flat impacts in heavy haul operations [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2009,223(2):153-161.
[95]Patra A P, Kumar U, Larsson-Kraik P. Assessment and Improvement of Railway Track Safety[C]//Proceedings of 9th International Heavy Haul Conference (IHHA).2009: 22-24.
[96]Zerbst U, Beretta S. Failure and damage tolerance aspects of railway components [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2011,18(2):534-542.
[97]Liu X, Saat M, Barkan C. Analysis of causes of major train derailment and their effect on accident rates [J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2012,2289(1):154-163.
[98]Liu X, Saat M, Qin X, et al. Analysis of US freight-train derailment severity using zero-truncated negative binomial regression and quintile regression [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,59:87-93
[99]Bao Y. Three-dimensional buckling/lateral shift analysis of continuous welded rail (CWR) track and innovative methods to enhance CWR track performance [D]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign,1998.
[100]National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad accident report:derailment of Amtrak auto train P052-18 on the CSXT railroad near Crescent city, Florida, April 18,2002[R]. Report number NTSB/RAR-03/02, National Technical Information, USA,2003.
[101]Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Railway investigation report:main-track derailment Canadian national train Q-120-31-30 mile 46.0, Drummondville subdivision villeroy, Quebec 30, July 2003 [R]. Report number R03Q0036, Canada,2005.
[102]Australian Transport Safety Bureau. ATSB transport safety investigation report: derailment of Pacific National Train 6MP4 Koolyanobbing, Western Australia,30 January,2005, and Pacific National Train 6SP5 Booraan, Western Australia,30 January, 2005[R]. Report number 2005/002, Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Australian, 2006.
[103]Zarembski A, Grissom G, Lees J. Assessing the risk of track buckling:to reduce the risk of track buckles [J]. Railway Track and Structures,2005.
[104]Masayuki, I. A study of track maintenance for the derailment due to the interaction between track and vehicle [J]. Japanese National Railway Technical Research Institute Quarterly Reports,1978,19:1-6.
[105]Cheli F, Corradi R, Diana G, et al. Effect of track geometrical defects on running safety of tramcar vehicles [J]. Vehicle system dynamics,2006,44(sup1):302-312.
[106]Steenbergen M, Esveld C. Relation between the geometry of rail welds and the dynamic wheel-rail response:numerical simulations for measured welds [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2006,220(4):409-423.
[107]Ishida H, Matsuo M, Fujioka T. Safety assessment method of railway vehicle under oscillatory wheel load fluctuation [J]. Journal of environment and engineering,2007, 2(2):407-418.
[108]Mohammadzadeh S, Sangtarashha M, Molatefi H. A novel method to estimate derailment probability due to track geometric irregularities using reliability techniques and advanced simulation methods [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics,2011,81(11): 1621-1637.
[109]Suarez B, Felez J, Antonio Lozano J, et al. Influence of the track quality and of the properties of the wheel-rail rolling contact on vehicle dynamics [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012:1-20.
[110]Choi I Um J H, Lee J S, et al. The influence of track irregularities on the running behavior of high-speed trains [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2013,227(1):94-102.
[111]Baker C J. Ground vehicles in high cross winds Part I:steady aerodynamic forces[J]. Journal of fluids and structures,1991,5(1):69-90.
[112]Baker C J. Ground vehicles in high cross winds part III:The interaction of aerodynamic forces and the vehicle system [J]. Journal of fluids and structures,1991, 5(2):221-241.
[113]Schetz J A. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001,33(1):371-414.
[114]Baker C J, Sterling M. Current and Recent International Work on Railway Aerodynamics[R]. Report Issue number 4, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham,2003.
[115]Carrarini, A. Reliability Based Analysis of the Crosswind Stability of Railway Vehicles [D]. Ph.D Thesis, Technical University Berlin,2006.
[116]Baker C, Cheli F, Orellano A, et al. Cross-wind effects on road and rail vehicles [J]. Vehicle system dynamics,2009,47(8):983-1022.
[117]Carrarini A. Reliability based analysis of the crosswind stability of railway vehicles[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2007,95(7):493-509.
[118]Diedrichs B, Ekequist M, Stichel S, et al. Quasi-static modelling of wheel-rail reactions due to crosswind effects for various types of high-speed rolling stock [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2004, 218(2):133-148.
[119]Diedrichs B, Sima M, Orellano A, et al. Crosswind stability of a high-speed train on a high embankment[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2007,221(2):205-225.
[120]Diedrichs B, Krajnovic S, Berg M. On Tail Vibrations of Very High-Speed Trains Cruising inside Tunnels. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 2008,2(1):51-75.
[121]Baker C J, Robinson C G. The assessment of wind tunnel testing techniques for ground vehicles in cross winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990,33(1):429-438.
[122]Baker C. The simulation of unsteady aerodynamic cross wind forces on trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2010,98(2):88-99.
[123]Baker C, Hemida H, Iwnicki S, et al. Integration of crosswind forces into train dynamic modeling [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2011,225(2):154-164.
[124]Hemida H, Baker C. Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a freight wagon subjected to a crosswind [J]. Computers & Fluids,2010,39(10):1944-1956.
[125]Sterling M, Baker C, Bouferrouk A, et al. An investigation of the aerodynamic admittances and aerodynamic weighting functions of trains [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2009,97(11):512-522.
[126]ChristianWetzel, Claire Yalamas, Carsten Proppe. On the influence of crosswind on the overturning stability of railway. PAMM.2007,7(1):19-20.
[127]Carsten Proppe, Christian Wetzel. A probabilistic approach for assessing the crosswind stability of ground vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010, Vol.48:411-428.
[128]Cheli F, Belforte P, Melzi S, et al. Numerical-experimental approach for evaluating cross-wind aerodynamic effects on heavy vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2006, 44(sup1):791-804.
[129]Cheli F, Ripamonti F, Rocchi D, et al. Aerodynamic behaviour investigation of the new EMUV250 train to cross wind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2010,98(4):189-201.
[130]Tomasini G, Cheli F. Admittance function to evaluate aerodynamic loads on vehicles: Experimental data and numerical model [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures,2013.
[131]Gawthorpe R G. Wind effects on ground transportation [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1994,52:73-92.
[132]Chiu T W. Prediction of the aerodynamic loads on a railway train in a cross-wind at large yaw angles using an integrated two-and three-dimensional source/vortex panel method [J]. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics,1995,57(1): 19-39.
[133]Orellano A, Schober M. On side-wind stability of high-speed trains [J]. Vehicle system dynamics,2003,40:143-159.
[134]Thomas D, Berg M, Stichel S. Measurements and simulations of rail vehicle dynamics with respect to overturning risk [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2010,48(1):97-112.
[135]Kozmar H, Butler K, Kareem A. Transient cross-wind aerodynamic loads on a generic vehicle due to bora gusts [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012,111:73-84.
[136]Fujii T, Maeda T, Ishida H, et al. Wind-Induced Accidents of Train/Vehicles and Their Measures in Japan[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,1999,40(1):50-55.
[137]Imai T, Fujii T, Tanemoto K, et al. New train regulation method based on wind direction and velocity of natural wind against strong winds [J]. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics,2002,90(12):1601-1610.
[138]Fukuhara T, Imai T. Evaluation Method of Train Operation Control under Gales Considering Temporal Fluctuations of Wind Velocity [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2007,48(3):148-152.
[139]Imai T, Araki K, Fukuhara T. A Method to Estimate the Probability of a Train Encountering Gusts in an Operating Section [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2009,50(4): 222-226.
[140]Hibino Y, Ishida H. Static Analysis on Railway Vehicle Overturning under Crosswind [J]. RTRI Report,2003,17(4):39-44.
[141]Xu Y L, Ding Q S. Interaction of railway vehicles with track in cross-winds [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures,2006,22(3):295-314.
[142]Nagase K, Kondo K, Nomura T. Train damaged by the quake in Kobe [J]. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Serial C,1997,63(606):300-307.
[143]Miyamoto T, Ishida H, Matsuo M. Running safety of railway vehicle as earthquake occurs[J]. Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports,1997,38(3): 117-122
[144]Miyamoto T, Matsumoto N, Sogabe M, et al. Full-scale Experiment on the Dynamic Behavior of Railway Vehicles against Heavy Track Vibration[J]. Journal of Environment and Engineering,2007,2(2):419-428.
[145]Miyamoto T, Ishida H. Numerical Analysis Focusing on the Running Safety of an Improved Bogie during Seismic Vibration [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2008,49(3): 173-177.
[146]Iida K, Suzuki M, Miyamoto T, et al. Development of a Lateral Damper to Improve the Running Safety of Railway Vehicles during an Earthquake [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2012,53(1):34-40.
[147]Railway Technical Research Institute, ed. Design standard for railway structures (Seismic designs) (In Japanese), Maruzen,1999:117-122.
[148]Nishimura K, Terumichi Y, Morimura T, et al. Development of vehicle dynamics simulation for safety analyses of rail vehicles on excited tracks [J]. Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics,2009,4(1):1-9.
[149]Nishimura K, Terumichi Y, Morimura T, et al. Experimental study on the vehicle safety by earthquake track excitation with 1/10 scale vehicle and roller rig[J]. Journal of System Design and Dynamics,2010,4(1):226-238.
[150]Nishimura K, Terumichi Y, Morimura T, et al. Analytical Study on the Safety of High Speed Railway Vehicle on Excited Tracks [J]. Journal of System Design and Dynamics, 2010,4(1):211-225.
[151]Tanabe M, Matsumoto N, Wakui H, et al. A simple and efficient numerical method for dynamic interaction analysis of a high-speed train and railway structure during an earthquake [J]. Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics,2008,3(4):1-8.
[152]Tanabe M, Matsumoto N, Wakui H, et al. Simulation of a Shinkansen train on the railway structure during an earthquake [J]. Japan journal of industrial and applied mathematics,2011,28(1):223-236.
[153]Yang Y B, Wu Y S. Dynamic stability of trains moving over bridges shaken by earthquakes [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2002,258(1):65-94.
[154]Wu Y. Dynamic interactions of train-rail-bridge system under normal and seismic conditions [D]. Ph.D Thesis, National Taiwan University, China,2000.
[155]Ju S H, Li H C. Dynamic interaction analysis of trains moving on embankments during earthquakes [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2011,330(22):5322-5332.
[156]Ju S H. Nonlinear analysis of high-speed trains moving on bridges during earthquakes [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics,2012,69(1-2):173-183.
[157]Luo X. Study on methodology for running safety assessment of trains in seismic design of railway structures [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2005,25(2): 79-91.
[158]Yang J, Li J B, Lin G. A simple approach to integration of acceleration data for dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis [J]. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering,2006,26(8):725-734.
[159]Kim C W, Kawatani M, Lee C H, et al. Seismic response of a monorail bridge incorporating train-bridge interaction [J]. Structural engineering and mechanics,2007, 26(2):111-126.
[160]Fryba L, Yau J D. Suspended bridges subjected to moving loads and support motions due to earthquake [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2009,319(1):218-227.
[161]Yau J D. Dynamic response analysis of suspended beams subjected to moving vehicles and multiple support excitations [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2009,325(4): 907-922.
[162]Matsuura A. Simulation for Analyzing Direct Derailment Limit of Running Vehicle on Oscillating Tracks [J]. Structural Engineering Earthquake Engineering,1998,15: 63s-72s.
[163]Matsumoto N, Sogabe M, Wakui H, et al. Running safety analysis of vehicles on structures subjected to earthquake motion [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI,2004,45(3): 116-122.
[164]Kim C W, Kawatani M. Effect of train dynamics on seismic response of steel monorail bridges under moderate ground motion [J]. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics,2006,35(10):1225-1245.
[165]Xu G, Troger H, Steindl A. Global analysis of the loss of stability of a special railway bogy[M]. Nonlinear Dynamics in Engineering Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1990:345-353.
[166]Ahmadian M, Yang S. Effect of system nonlinearities on locomotive bogie hunting stability [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1998,29(6):365-384.
[167]Polach O. On non-linear methods of bogie stability assessment using computer simulations [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,2006,220(1):13-27.
[168]Fan Y T, Wu W F. Stability analysis and derailment evaluation of rail vehicles [J]. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems,2006,13(3):194-211.
[169]Lee S Y, Cheng Y C. Nonlinear analysis on hunting stability for high-speed railway vehicle trucks on curved tracks [J]. Journal of vibration and acoustics,2005,127(4): 324-332.
[170]Kim P, Seok J. Bifurcation analysis on the hunting behavior of a dual-bogie railway vehicle using the method of multiple scales [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2010, 329(19):4017-4039.
[171]Abood K H A, Khan R A. Hunting phenomenon study of railway conventional truck on tangent tracks due to change in rail wheel geometry [J]. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology,2011,6(2):146-160.
[172]Wang F C, Hsieh M R, Chen H J. Stability and performance analysis of a full-train system with inverters[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(4):545-571.
[173]Xue-jun G, Ying-hui L, Yuan Y, et al. Symmetric/asymmetric bifurcation behaviours of a bogie system [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2012.
[174]Han H S, Koo J S. Simulation of train crashes in three dimensions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2003,40(6):435-450.
[175]Koo J S, Cho H J. A method to predict the derailment of rolling stock due to collision using a theoretical wheelset derailment model [J]. Multibody System Dynamics,2012, 27(4):403-422.
[176]Zhou H, Wang W, Hecht M. Three-dimensional override analysis of crashed railway multiple units [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(4):663-674.
[177]Zhou H, Wang W, Hecht M. Three-dimensional derailment analysis of a crashed city tram [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2013. dx.doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.790553
[178]Stringfellow R, Rancatore R, Liana P, et al. Analysis of colliding vehicle interactions for the passenger rail train-to-train impact test[C]//Rail Conference,2004. Proceedings of the 2004 ASME/IEEE Joint. IEEE,2004:11-18.
[179]Sun Y Q, Cole C, Dhanasekar M, et al. Modelling and analysis of the crush zone of a typical Australian passenger train [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(7): 1137-1155.
[180]杨国桢.铁道车辆脱轨安全性的设计(上、下)[J].铁道车辆,1974,11：8-26；12：12-32.
[181]杨国桢.二轴转向架脱轨安全性的研究[J].铁道学报,1979,2：12-24.
[182]郭荣生.铁道车辆在曲线上脱轨问题的基本轮轨关系-轮对的导向能力[J].铁道车辆,1981,1：9-17.
[183]李富达,黄建苒,樊建民,张京军.小半径曲线上棚车脱轨安全性研究[J].中国铁道科学,1986,2：35-50.
[184]陈光雄,罗资.轮对脱轨判断原理的初步分析[J].铁道车辆,1990,8：13-18.
[185]陈光雄,鲍维千.缓和曲线上周期性线路不平顺对车辆脱轨的影响[J].铁道车辆, 2000,38(4)：1-5.
[186]张卫华,薛弼一,吴学杰,胡柳嘉.单轮对脱轨试验及其理论分析[J].铁道学报,1998,20(1)：39-44.
[187]曾京.车辆系统的蛇行运动分叉及极限环的数值计算[J].铁道学报,1996,18(3)：13-19.
[188]Wu P, Zeng J. Dynamic analysis for derailment safety of railway vehicles [J]. Safety Science and Technology,1998:292-299.
[189]Zeng, J and Wu, P. Stability Analysis of High Speed Railway Vehicles [J]. JSME International Journal,2004,47(2):464-470.
[190]曾京.轮对稳态脱轨准则的研究[J].铁道学报,1999,21(6)：15-19.
[191]曾京,关庆华.铁道车辆运行安全评判的轮对爬轨脱轨准则[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(6)：1-5.
[192]关庆华.列车脱轨机理及运行安全性研究[D].成都：西南交通大学博士学位论文,2010.
[193]俞展猷.防脱轨性能的评定[J].机车电传动,1999,(5)：1-5.
[194]俞展猷,李富达,李谷.车轮脱轨及其评价[J].铁道学报,1999,21(3)：33-38.
[195]曾宇清,王卫东,舒兴高,于卫东.车辆脱轨安全评判的动态限度[J].中国铁道科学,1999,20(4)：70-76.
[196]沈钢,王福天.轮对蛇行失稳导致脱轨的机理研究[J].上海铁道大学学报,2000,21(8)：1-6.
[197]Knothe K L, Grassie S L. Modeling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1993,22:209-262.
[198]翟婉明,陈果.根据车轮抬升量评判车辆脱轨的方法与准则[J].铁道学报,2001,23(2)：17-26.
[199]曾庆元,向俊,娄平.车桥及车轨时变系统横向振动计算中的根本问题与列车脱轨能量随机分析理论[J].中国铁道科学,2002,01：3-12.
[200]向俊.列车脱轨机理与脱轨分析理论研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2006.
[201]周智辉.列车脱轨分析理论与控制脱轨的桥梁横向刚度限值研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2007.
[202]Xiang J, Zeng Q, Lou P. Transverse vibration of train-bridge and train-track time varying system and the theory of random energy analysis for train derailment [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2004,41(2):129-155.
[203]肖新标.轨道运动对列车脱轨影响的研究初探[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2005.
[204]肖新标,金学松,温泽峰.钢轨扣件失效对列车动态脱轨的影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2006,6(1)：10-15.
[205]肖新标,温泽峰,金学松.轨下支承失效对车辆系统动态响应及乘坐舒适度的影响[J].铁道学报,2007,06：26-33.
[206]肖新标,金学松,温泽峰.轨枕支撑硬点对轨枕动力响应的影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,06：28-35.
[207]肖新标,金学松,温泽峰.轨下支承失效对直线轨道动态响应的影响[J].力学学报,2008,40(1)：67-78.
[208]邓永权,肖新标,肖广文.横风作用时间对高速客车直线运行安全性的影响[J].铁道机车车辆,2008,05：1-5.
[209]金学松,凌亮,肖新标,朱曼昊,周仲荣.复杂环境下高速列车动态行为数值仿真和运行安全域分析[J].计算机辅助工程,2011,20(3)：29-41.
[210]凌亮,肖新标,吴磊,金学松.地震激励下高速列车动态响应与运行安全边界研[J].铁道学报,2012,10：16-22.
[211]凌亮,肖新标,吴磊,金学松.地震波频谱特性对高速列车动态脱轨行为的影响[J].工程力学,2013,01：384-393.
[212]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Wen Zefeng. Effect of disabled fastening systems and ballast on vehicle derailment [J]. Journal of vibration and acoustics,2007,129(2): 217-229.
[213]Xiao Xinbiao, Wen Zefeng, Jin Xuesong, et al. Effects of track support failures on dynamic response of high speed tracks [J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation,2007,8(4):615.
[214]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Deng Yongquan, et al. Effect of curved track support failure on vehicle derailment [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,46(11):1029-1059.
[215]Zhang Shuguang, Xiao Xinbiao, Wen Zefeng, et al. Effect of unsupported sleepers on wheel/rail normal load [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2008,28(8): 662-673.
[216]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Wen Zefeng, Minhao Zhu. Effect of crosswind on high speed railway vehicle running safety[C]//International Symposium on Speed-up, Safety and Service Technology for Railway and Maglev Systems 2009 (STECH'09). Niigata Japan,2009.
[217]Deng Yongquan, Xiao Xinbiao. Effect of Cross-Wind on High-Speed Vehicle Dynamic Derailment. Logistics:The Emerging Frontiers of Transportation and Development in China,2009,2287-2293.
[218]Xiao Xinbiao, Jin Xuesong, Wen Zefeng, et al. Effect of tangent track buckle on vehicle derailment [J]. Multibody System Dynamics,2011,25(1):1-41.
[219]Jin Xuesong, Xiao Xinbiao, Ling Liang. Study on the safety boundary for high speed trains in severe environments[C]//Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on High-Speed and Intercity Railways. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2012:201-224.
[220]Xiao Xinbiao, Ling Liang, Jin Xuesong. A study of the derailment mechanism of a high speed train due to an earthquake [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2012,50(3): 449-470.
[221]Jin Xuesong, Xiao Xinbiao, Ling Liang, et al. Study on safety boundary for high-speed train running in severe environments [J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2013,1(1-2):87-108.
[222]向俊,杨桦,赫丹.轨枕悬空条件下的列车-轨道系统竖向振动响应研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2007,01：8-12.
[223]翁长根,赫丹,王阳,向俊.扣件失效对城市轨道交通列车-浮置板式轨道系统竖向振动响应的影响[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2008,02：29-33.
[224]向俊,赫丹,曾庆元.水泥沥青砂浆劣化对板式轨道动力学性能的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,03：791-796.
[225]吴磊.地铁车辆-钢弹簧浮置板轨道耦合动态行为的研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2012.
[226]石玮荃.高速铁路板式轨道结构缺陷对动力学性能的影响分析[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2011.
[227]潘春花.地铁车辆悬挂系统的参数优化及失效分析[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2012.
[228]朱剑月.轨下扣件支承失效对轨道结构动力性能的影响[J].振动工程学报,2011,02：158-163.
[229]朱剑月,张艳.轨枕吊空对轨道结构动力性能的影响[J].中国铁道科学,2011,03：8-15.
[230]王伟.高速车辆脱轨非线性动力学及其动态仿真[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文,2010.
[231]田红旗.列车空气动力学[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2007.
[232]高广军.强侧风作用下列车运行安全性研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2008.
[233]向俊,彭铁光,赫丹,曾京.横风作用下高速列车-板式轨道系统空间振动分[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2009,6(4)：1-5.
[234]陈锐林.强风作用下列车脱轨分析[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2008.
[235]任尊松,徐宇工,王璐雷,邱英政.强侧风对高速列车运行安全性影响研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(6)：46-50.
[236]崔涛.高速列车流固耦合振动及运行安全性研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2011.
[237]郗艳红.横风作用下的高速列车气动特性及运行安全性研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2012.
[238]郗艳红,毛军,高亮,杨国伟,曲文强.横风作用下高速列车安全运行速度限值的研究[J].铁道学报,2012,06：8-14.
[239]李人宪,翟婉明.磁悬浮列车横风稳定性的数值分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2001,01：99-101.
[240]黄林.列车风与自然风联合作用下的车-桥耦合振动分析[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2007.
[241]凌知民,高碧波,项海帆.横风对货车通过高墩桥梁行车安全性的影响分析[J].铁道学报,2007,04：80-86.
[242]姚应峰.横风作用下200km／h动车组安全性研究[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[243]许士军.横风环境下动车组倾覆稳定性研究[D].中南大学硕士学位论文,2009.
[244]崔景魁.强侧风环境下铁路客运列车速度限值研究[D].中南大学硕士学位论文,2009.
[245]杨吉忠.考虑空气动力效应时高速列车运行安全平稳性研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2010.
[246]于梦阁.高速列车风致安全研究[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[247]苗秀娟.瞬态风荷载下的列车运行安全性研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2012.
[248]夏禾,张楠.车辆与结构动力相互作用(第二版)口咽.北京：科学出版社,2005.
[249]张楠,夏禾.地震对多跨简支梁桥上列车运行安全的影响[J].世界地震工程,2001,04：93-99.
[250]韩艳.地震作用下高速铁路桥梁的动力响应及行车安全性研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2005.
[251]杜宪亭.强地震作用下大跨度桥梁空间动力效应及列车运行安全研究[D].北京交通大学博士学位论文,2011.
[252]王开云,王少林,杨久川,王慎.地震环境下铁路轮轨动态安全性能及脱轨研究进展[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,06：82-94.
[253]熊建珍,高芒芒,俞翰斌.天兴洲长江大桥斜拉桥在地震作用下的车-桥耦合振动分析[J].中国铁道科学,2006,27(5)：54-59.
[254]谭长建,祝兵.地震作用下高速列车与桥梁耦合振动分析[J].振动与冲击,2009,01：4-8.
[255]林玉森.地震作用下高速铁路桥上列车行走性研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2007.
[256]张志超.车桥系统耦合振动和地震响应的随机分析[D].大连理工大学博士学位论文,2010.
[257]陈令坤.地震作用下高速铁路列车-无砟轨道-桥梁系统动力响应及走行安全研究[D].中南大学博士学位论文,2012.
[258]王少林,翟婉明.地震作用下高速列车-线路-桥梁系统动力响应[J].西南交通大学学报,2011,01：56-62.
[259]徐鹏.列车-轨道-路基耦合振动及地震条件下行车安全性分析[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2012.
[260]杨坤.城市高架桥简支梁在地震作用下轨道列车响应及运行的安全性分析[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2010.
[261]彭荣华,王柳,郭向荣.横向地震激励下的悬索桥车-桥耦合动力响应分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2012,04：19-24.
[262]Jin Xuesong, Wu PingBo, Wen Zefeng. Effect of structure elastic deformations of wheelset and track on creep forces of wheel/rail in rolling contact[J]. Wear,2002,253: 247-256.
[263]金学松,刘启跃.轮轨摩擦学[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2004.
[264]Saito M. Japanese railway safety and the technology of the day[J]. Japan Railway & Transport Review,2002,33:4-13.
[265]张卫华.动车组总体与转向架[M].北京：中国铁道出版社,2011.
[266]刘宏友.高速列车中的关键动力学问题研究[D].西南交通大学博士学位论文,2003.
[267]陈凯,陈海.铁道车辆车端阻尼装置[J].国外铁道车辆,2004,41(4)：5-12.
[268]Zhai Wanming, Cai Chengbiao, Guo Shizhang. Coupling model of vertical and lateral vehicle/track interactions [J]. Vehicle system Dynamics,1996,26:61-79.
[269]Dong R G. Vertical dynamics of railway vehicle-track system [M]. Ph.D thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,1994.
[270]Steffens D. Identification and Development of a Model of Railway Track Dynamic Behaviour [M]. Queensland University of Technology, Queenslan,2005.
[271]Cai Z Q. Modeling of rail track dynamics and wheel/rail interaction [M]. Ph.D thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada,1992.
[272]Sun Y Q. Dhanasekar, M. A dynamic model for the vertical interaction of the rail track and wagon system[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,2002,39: 1337-1359.
[273]屈维德,唐恒龄.机械振动手册(第二版)[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000.
[274]Timoshenko S. Vibration Problems in Engineering (Fourth Edition) [M]. John Wiley& Sons, Inc., USA,1974.
[275]徐志胜,翟婉明,王开云.基于Timoshenko梁模型的车辆-轨道耦合振动分析[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(1)：22-27.
[276]Newton S G. An investigation into the dynamic effects on the track of wheelflats on railway vehicles [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,1979,21:287-297.
[277]倪振华.振动力学[M].西安：西安交通大学出版社,1988.
[278]Grassie S, Gregory R, Harrison D, Johnson K. The dynamic response of railway track to high frequency vertical/lateral/longitudinal excitation [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,1982,24(22):77-102.
[279]Popp K, Kruse H, Kaiser I. Vehicle-track dynamics in the mid-frequency range [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1999,31(5-6):423-464.
[280]Craig R. Structural dynamics-an introduction to computer methods [M]. John Wiley & Sons, New York,1981.
[281]颜云辉,谢里阳,韩清凯.结构分析中的有限单元法及其应用[M].沈阳：东北大学出版社,2000.
[282]朱伯芳.有限单元法原理与应用(第三版)[M].北京：中国水利水电出版社,2009.
[283]温泽峰.轮轨结构弹性变形对轮轨滚动接触力学行为的影响[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,1997.
[284]温泽峰,金学松.轮轨结构变形对高速机车单轮对牵引力矩的影响[J].铁道学报,2001,23(4)：21-26.
[285]温泽峰,金学松.轮轨结构横向变形对轮轨滚动接触蠕滑力的影响[J].机械强度,2002,24(3)：383-387.
[286]Bezin Y, Iwnicki S D, Cavalletti M. The effect of dynamic rail roll on the wheel-rail contact conditions [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2008,46(S1):107-117.
[287]王开云,翟婉明,蔡成标.钢轨扭转运动对轮轨动态相互作用的影响[J].中国铁道科学,2008,29(3)：68-72.
[288]陈果,翟婉明,左洪福.新型轮轨空间动态耦合模型[J].振动工程学报,2001,14(4)：402-408.
[289]Chen G, Zhai W M. A New Wheel Rail Spatially Dynamic Coupling Model and its Verification[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,2004,41(4):301-322.
[290]Kalker J J. On the rolling contact of two elastic bodies in the presence of dry friction[D]. Ph.D thesis, Delft University, Netherland,1967
[291]Vermeulen P J, Johnson K L. Contact of non-spherical bodies transmitting tangential forces [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics,1964,31:338-340
[292]Shen Z Y, Hedrick J K, Elkins J A. A comparison of alternative creep force models for rail vehicle dynamic analysis [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics,1983,12(1-3):79-83.
[293]Kalker J J. Simplified theory of rolling contact[J]. Delft Progress Report,1973,1(1): 1-10.
[294]Kalker J J. Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact [M]. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands,1990.
[295]Baeza L, Ouyang H. A railway track dynamics model based on modal substructuring and a cyclic boundary condition [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2011,330(1): 75-86.
[296]铁运[2008]28号,高速动车组整车试验规范[S].中国铁道部,2008.
[297]Railway Group Standard, Resistance of railway vehicles to roll-over in Gales [S]. GM/RT2142, Railway Group Standard,2009.
[298]GB／T 17742-2008.中国地震烈度表[S].北京：中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局／中国国家标准化管理委员会,2008.