用户名: 密码: 验证码:
联合应用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉对大鼠边缘性体积供肝移植的供肝保护作用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
第一部分大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植模型的建立
     目的
     本部分实验通过离体减体积肝叶切除供肝―大鼠原位肝移植方式,探讨大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植模型建立的方法,为研究小肝综合症的发病机制及防治措施提供一个较为理想的小动物模型。
     材料和方法
     选用健康、9~12周龄、体重190~250g的雄性大鼠192只作为实验动物,取周龄相差1~3周,体重相差20~30克的大鼠,以小体重大鼠作为供体,采用离体减体积肝叶切除方式行不同体积供肝的大鼠原位肝移植。本部分实验设立4个实验组:A组,全肝移植组(n=24);B组,50%部分肝移植组(切除肝左叶,双乳突叶,保留肝中叶、右后叶和右前叶作为供肝,使供肝与受体肝比值控制在50%左右,n=24);C组,30%部分肝移植组,除保留大鼠肝中叶外,其余四叶均予以切除,使供肝重量与受体肝比值控制在30%~35%之间,n=24);D组:小于30%部分肝移植组(保留右前叶、右后叶和双乳突叶,切除肝中叶和左叶,使供肝与受体肝比值小于30%,n=24)。供、受体均采用乙醚持续开放式吸入麻醉,大鼠原位肝移植血管重建采用双袖套法,不做肝动脉血管重建。观察各组术后肝功能ALT和AST水平、门静脉压力和存活率,光镜下及电镜下表现,比较分析各组间ALT、门静脉压力及累积存活率之间的关系。
     结果
     1.全肝移植组(A组)7天累积存活率为100%(12/12),50%部分肝移植组(B组)7天累积存活率为83.3%(10/12),30%部分肝移植组(C组)7天累积存活率为16.7%(2/12),小于30%部分肝移植组(D组)均于术后48小时内死亡。各组间存活率经生存分析life-table方法比较,A组与B组累积存活率比较,组间差异无统计学意义,p=0.148; C组与A组累积存活率比较,组间差异有统计学意义,p<0.001;C组与B组两组存活率有显著性差异,p<0.001; C组与D组两组存活率有显著性差异,p<0.001;
     2.受体在移植前基础门静脉压力各组间差异无统计学意义,p>0.05。A组术中开放门静脉后1小时内门静脉压力稳定,B组开放门静脉后门静脉压力虽有小幅上升,但门静脉压力仍保持相对稳定,而C组和D组开放门静脉后门静脉压力显著升高,15分钟达到峰值,两组门静脉压力峰值分别较基础门静脉压力升高65%和82%。两组门静脉压力30分钟开始回落,至45分钟到60分钟逐渐稳定,但仍维持于一高位。将供肝体积的大小与各时间点的门静脉压力进行Pearson相关分析后发现,供肝体积的大小与基础门静脉压力无相关性,相关系数r=0.249,p=0.241;而供肝体积大小与开放门静脉后5、15、30、45、60分钟门静脉压力呈负相关性,(相关系数分别为r=-0.926,r=-0.936, r=-0.904, r=-0.902, r=-0.867, p<0.05)。
     3.肝移植术后24小时各组ALT和AST水平明显升高,四组中以D组水平最高,C组次之,B组和A组最低,各组间差异有统计学意义,p<0.001。将供肝体积大小与各组移植术后24小时ALT和AST水平进行Pearson相关分析后,结果显示供肝体积大小与移植术后24小时ALT和AST水平呈负相关性,相关系数r分别为-0.704和-0.815, p<0.05。
     4.光镜下可见各组均出现不同程度的肝窦充血、局部肝窦扩张、血管内皮细胞完整性受损、肝板结构改变及肝细胞空泡变性等形态学异常的表现。与其他组相比较,C,D组在术后24小时形态学异常的表现均较为明显且程度严重。
     5.电镜观察结果显示,C,D组在肝移植术后24小时出现严重的肝窦内皮细胞线性结构完整性破坏、线粒体肿胀等严重的形态学异常。A,B在相应的时间点肝细胞的超显微结构保持得相对完整
     结论
     1.再次证实直视下离体减体积肝叶切除供肝―大鼠原位肝移植模型是作为为小肝综合症基础性研究的较为理想的小动物模型,具有很好的可靠性和可重复性。
     2.再次证实了大鼠减体积供肝肝移植模型供肝体积大小的安全界限为50%标准体积;体积介于35~30%标准体积之间的供肝应视为边缘性体积移植物,小于30%标准体积的供肝可视为超小体积肝移植。
     3.大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植模型的建立,可选取周龄相差1~3周,体重相差20~30克的大鼠,以小体重的大鼠作为供体,除保留肝中叶外,其余四叶均予以切除,可以使供肝湿重与受体肝比值控制在30%~35%之间。
     4.大鼠减体积供肝肝移植模型中,供肝体积大小与开放门静脉压力升高幅度及术后24小时ALT和AST水平呈负相关性,小体积供肝肝移植术中开放门静脉后急剧升高的门静脉压力对肝窦造成的应力性的损伤,是导致肝移植术后小体积移植物功能损害、受体存活率降低的主要原因。
     第二部分联合应用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉对大鼠边缘性体积肝移植的移植物保护作用的研究
     目的
     本部分实验拟对大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植术后小体积移植物早期损伤的机制进行初步研究,探讨在大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植术中联合使用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉,降低再灌注期间门静脉压力,减轻缺血再灌注损伤对边缘性体积供肝早期损伤的保护作用机制。
     材料和方法
     选用健康、体重相差20~30克的雄性SD大鼠300只,以小体重大鼠为供体,按第一部分介绍的方法建立大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植模型,将供受体大鼠随机分为:A组,边缘性体积部分肝移植生理盐水对照组;B组,边缘性体积部分肝移植依达拉奉实验组;C组,边缘性体积部分肝移植厄贝沙坦实验组;D组,边缘性体积部分肝移植厄贝沙坦联合依达拉奉实验组;E组,假手术组。观察各组术后一般情况、门静脉压力和存活率,各组分别于术后6小时和24小时各取6只受体在无菌操作条件下采取下腔静脉血标本和肝组织标本。测定血清中ALT、AST水平、肝细胞匀浆内SOD活力和MDA含量、RT-PCR检测肝组织中Egr-1,ET-1,Bax mRNA表达情况,免疫组化检测肝组织中ET-1,Bax,TNF表达情况,TUNEL检测肝组织细胞凋亡情况以及光镜下观察肝组织形态学改变。
     结果
     1.光镜下可见各组均出现不同程度的肝窦充血、局部肝窦扩张、血管内皮细胞完整性受损、肝板结构改变及肝细胞空泡变性等形态学异常的表现。以术后6小时最为严重。与其他组相比较,A,B组在术后6小时和24小时形态学异常的表现均较为明显且程度严重。D组最轻。E组无明显变化。
     2.A组7天累积存活率为8.33%(1/12),B组7天累积存活率为33.3%(4/12),C组7天累积存活率为58. 7%(7/12), D组7天累积存活率为83. 3%(10/12),E组7天累积存活率为100%(12/12),经SPSS生存分析life-table方法比较,各组累积存活率之间的差异有统计学意义。A组与B组累积存活率比较,组间差异有统计学意义,p=0.018; C组与A组累积存活率比较,组间差异有统计学意义,p<0.001;D组与A组两组存活率有显著性差异,p<0.001; E组与A组两组存活率有显著性差异,p<0.001;
     3.C,D组受体移植前基础门静脉压力低于A,B组,各组间均数比较,差异有统计学意义(8.21,8.15 vs 10.28,10.55,p=0.019)。各组开放门静脉恢复血流灌注后门静脉压力的峰值均出现在开放门静脉后的15分钟处,但C,D组门静脉压力峰值要明显低于A,B组,各组间均数比较差异有显著统计学意义(15.76,15.80 vs 18.11,18.55 ,p<0.001)。开放门静脉30分钟之后两组门静脉逐渐回落,C,D组开放门静脉后门静脉压力维持相对稳定,波动于12.63~13.42cmH_2O之间,峰值门静脉压力较基础门静脉压力升高幅度达23.1%。而A,B组恢复门静脉灌注后门静脉压力显著升高,波动于15.47~16.52cmH_2O之间,峰值门静脉压力较基础门静脉压力升高幅度高达65.5%。C,D组在恢复门静脉灌注后的5、15、30和60分钟各时间点均明显低于A,B组,各组各时间点门静脉压力均数经单因素方差分析,LSD分析,p<0.001,差异有显著统计学意义。
     4.实验中各组肝移植术后血清ALT和AST水平显著升高,均在再灌注6小时升至峰值,术后24小时虽有所下降,但仍处于高水平状态。说明移植后移植物的肝实质细胞的损伤以6小时最为严重,24小时内仍处于一个急性期阶段。与其他组相比较A,B组在术后6小时和24小时血清ALT和AST水平显著升高,均较为明显且程度严重。D组最轻。E组无明显变化。各组间ALT和AST均数经比较差异有统计学意义,p<0.05。说明再灌注期间降低门脉压力,抗氧化减轻缺血再灌注损伤可减轻小体积移植物肝实质细胞的损伤的程度。
     5.本实验中各组肝移植术后MDA水平显著升高,均在再灌注6小时升至峰值,术后24小时虽有所下降,但仍处于高水平状态。说明移植后移植物的缺血再灌注损伤以6小时最为严重,24小时内仍处于一个急性期阶段。与其他组相比较,A,B组在术后6小时和24小时MDA水平显著升高。均较为明显且程度严重。D组最轻。E组无明显变化。各组间MDA均数经比较差异有统计学意义,p<0.05。本实验中各组肝移植术后SOD水平显著下降,说明移植后移植物的缺血再灌注损伤SOD不断耗竭,24小时内仍处于耗竭阶段。与其他组相比较,A,B组在术后6小时和24小时SOD水平显著降低。均较为明显且程度严重。D组最轻。E组无明显变化。各组各亚组间SOD均数经比较差异有统计学意义,p<0.05。说明各组大鼠受体均不同预处理后,缺血再灌注损伤有显著差别。D组缺血再灌注损伤较A,B,C组轻。E组无明显变化。说明联合使用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉能明显减轻小体积移植物缺血再灌注损伤。
     6.A组术后6小时和24小时Egr-1 mRNA ,ET-1mRNA ,BaxmRNA表达均高于其他组(p<0.05)。D组术后6小时和24小时Egr-1 mRNA ,ET-1mRNA ,BaxmRNA表达较A,B,C组表达低(p<0.05)。说明在厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉的联合作用下,Egr-1 mRNA ,ET-1mRNA ,BaxmRNA表达较低。而C组术后6小时和24小时Egr-1mRNA, ET-1mRNA , BaxmRNA表达均低于B组(p<0.05)。说明在小体积肝移植中,门静脉一过性增高对这些mRNA影响大于缺血再灌注因素。
     7、免疫组化显示:A组术后6小时和24小时ET-1,Bax,TNF表达均高于其他组(p<0.05)。D组术后6小时和24小时ET-1 ,Bax,TNF表达较A,B,C组表达低(p<0.05)。说明在厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉的联合作用下,ET-1,Bax,TNF表达较低。而C组术后6小时和24小时ET-1 ,Bax,TNF表达均低于B组(p<0.05)。说明在小体积肝移植中,门静脉一过性增高对这些基因蛋白的影响大于缺血再灌注因素。
     8、Tunel显示:A组术后6小时和24小时凋亡指数高于其他组(p<0.05)。D组术后6小时和24小时凋亡指数较A,B,C组表达低(p<0.05)。说明在厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉的联合作用下,肝细胞凋亡较少。而C组术后6小时和24小时凋亡指数表达均低于B组(p<0.05)。说明在小体积肝移植中,门静脉一过性增高对细胞凋亡的影响大于缺血再灌注因素。
     结论
     1.大鼠边缘性体积部分肝移植术后造成小体积移植物的灌注后损伤的特殊性就在于其面临的是早期门静脉过度灌注和缺血再灌注的双重损伤。
     2.在大鼠边缘性体积供肝移植中,门静脉压力升高和缺血再灌注损伤两个因素中,门静脉压力升高对肝窦内皮细胞造成的应力性损伤,对供肝的损害最大。
     3.针对以上两个损伤因素,联合使用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉可通过降低门静脉压力,抗氧化减轻缺血再灌注损伤的双重保护作用可明显的减轻大鼠边缘性体积肝移植术后早期小体积移植物的损伤程度,较单纯使用一种药物效果好。
     第三部分联合应用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉对大鼠边缘性体积肝移植的移植物再生影响的研究
     目的
     本部分实验通过在大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植术中联合使用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉,降低再灌注期间门静脉压力,抗氧化减轻缺血再灌注损伤,减轻小体积移植物早期损伤,初步探讨联合使用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉对大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝移植术后小体积供肝再生的影响。
     材料和方法
     选用健康、体重相差20~30克的雄性SD大鼠72只,以小体重大鼠为供体,按第一部分介绍的方法建立大鼠边缘性体积肝脏移植模型。随机分为:A组,边缘性体积部分肝移植依达拉奉实验组和B组,边缘性体积部分肝移植厄贝沙坦实验组,C组,边缘性体积部分肝移植厄贝沙坦联合依达拉奉实验组。各组于术后2、7天各随机抽取6只存活受体在乙醚麻醉下取肝组织标本。分别测定供肝湿重、肝组织免疫组化Ki-67标记指数,了解大鼠边缘性体积供肝肝脏移植术后供肝再生的初步情况。
     结果
     1、C组移植术后供肝湿重(D1)、移植术后大鼠供肝湿重与受体原肝脏湿重之比(D1/R)和供肝再生率(D1/R -D0/R)在第2天和第7天明显高于A,B组,p<0.05,差异有统计学意义.B组移植术后供肝湿重(D1)、移植术后大鼠供肝湿重与受体原肝脏湿重之比(D1/R)和供肝再生率(D1/R -D0/R)在第2天和第7天明显高于A组,p<0.05,差异有统计学意义。
     2、免疫组化Ki-67标记指数结果显示,各组中Ki-67标记指数的高峰均出现在术后第2天。C组术后第2天和第7天的Ki-67标记指数均高于A组,B组,各组间比较差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),B组术后第2天和第7天的Ki-67标记指数均高于A组,各组间比较差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),
     结论
     1.联合使用厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉组对肝细胞的再生没有直接的促进作用,供肝再生的影响是通过通过降低门静脉压力,抗氧化减轻缺血再灌注损伤的双重保护作用减轻了边缘性体积供肝的损伤程度,间接的维护供肝细胞再生的顺利进行。比单纯使用一种药物的效果好。
     2.厄贝沙坦和依达拉奉对肝细胞的再生没有直接的促进作用,厄贝沙坦通过降低门静脉压力减轻了边缘性体积供肝的损伤程度,间接维护供肝细胞再生的作用较依达拉奉抗氧化减轻缺血再灌注损伤,间接的维护供肝细胞再生的作用效果好。
PART 1 ESTABLISHMENT OF A LIVER TRANSPLANTATION MODEL USING MARGINAL SIZE GRAFT IN RATS
     Objective: Our aim in this part is to establish an animal model of marginal size graft-orthotopic liver transplantation using reduced size liver transplantation on rats, provides a stable animal model for the investigation of the mechanism of small-for-size syndrome after liver transplantation..
     Methods: we used male Spraue-Dawley rats, (190~250grams,±20~30 grams), 4 groups designated according to the ratios of donor and recipient liver weight: Group A, whole graft group(n=24); group B, 50% ratio liver transplantation ( the median lobe and right lobe of the liver was selected to be the graft,n=24); group C, 30% ratio liver transplantation (the median lobe of the liver were selected to be the graft, n=24); group D, less than 30% ratio liver transplantation (the median lobe and left lobe of the liver were resected, and remaining lobe was selected to be the graft, n=24). A rat model of nonarterialized orthotopic liver transplantation without veno-venous bypass was used. In the small-for-size graft group, the lobe ligation technique was used to reduce the graft size on the backtable. Operation parameters, portal pressure, liver function indices and survival rate were observed and analyzed for all groups. Liver specimens were morphologically examined under the light microscopy and electron microscopy.
     Results:
     1. One week survival rate of the group A, B, C and D was 100%(12/12), 83.3%(10/12), 16.7%(2/12) and 0, respectively. The differences were statistically significant, p<0.001.
     2. The portal pressure of the whole graft group were relative stable after reperfusion.But there was a significant increase in portal pressure in the reduce size graft group at 5 and 15 minutes after reperfusion compared with that pre-transplantation. This increase in portal pressure reached a peak at 15 minutes (increased by 65%~82%, group C, 16.47cmH20 vs 9.97 cmH20, p<0.05;group D,18.25 cmH20 vs 10.05 cmH20, p<0.05) and gradually subsided after 30 minutes of reperfusion. The relations between the size of graft and the portal pressure at 5,15,30,45,60 minutes after reperfusion are negative, (r=-0.926, r=-0.936, r=-0.904, r=-0.902, r=-0.867, p<0.05).
     3. In each group ALT and AST levels increased significantly at 24 hours after liver transplantation, the highest in group D , followed by group C, group B, and group A. The differences were statistically significant, p<0.001. The relations between the size of graft and ALT and AST levels are negative, (r=-0.704, r=-0.815, p<0.05).
     4. H&E staining revealed that the hepatic lobular architecture was well preserved in group A and group B at 24 hours after reperfusion. The hepatocytes and portal tracts showed normal morphological features. On the contrary, Focal necrosis was found mainly around the portal tract in the group C and group D at 24 hours after reperfusion.
     5. In group C and group D, electron microscopy showed severe mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum swelling of hepatocytes accompanied by loss of microvilli; while in group A and group B, both the cell nucleus and cellular organelles had no significant breakdown.
     Conclusions:
     1. We confirmed again that the rat model of marginal size graft-orthotopic liver transplantation using reduced size liver transplantation was a suitable and stable animal model for the investigation of the mechanism of small- for-size syndrome after liver transplantation.
     2. We confirmed again that the minimum safely graft volume ratio in rat liver transplantation is 50%, the marginal size graft volume ratio is between 30~35%, and the ratio less than 30% should be considered as extra-small-for-size liver transplantation in the rat.
     3. To establish an animal model of orthotopic liver transplantation using marginal size graft in rat,we can use rats (190~250grams,±20~30 grams). The median lobe of the liver was selected to be the graft to get the graft ratio in a range between 30~35%.
     4. In a rat liver transplantation model using marginal size graft, the portal pressure changes in marginal size grafts are transient. Progressive damage of the graft may result from microcirculatory failure due to irreversible endothelial injury after reperfusion.
     PART 2 PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF IRBESARTAN AND EDARAVONE ON MARGINAL SIZE LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN RATS
     Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the protective effect of IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE on decreasing portal pressure and reducing ischemia- reperfusion injury in the rat liver transplantation model using marginal size graft and to explore the mechanism of the marginal size graft injury during acute phase of reperfusion.
     Methods: The previously described rat model of nonarterialized liver transplantation using marginal size graft was used. Survived recipients were divided into five groups: group A, control group; group B, EDARAVONE treatment group; group C, IRBESARTAN treatment group; group D, IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE treatment group; group E, sham operation group. Six rats in each group were sacrificed randomly at 6 hour and 24 hour after reperfusion respectively. The survival rate of animals and portal pressure were investigated. The rats in every group were sacrificed and its blood sample were collected for liver function measurement. Liver specimens were morphologically examined under light microscopy. The content of SOD and MDA in liver tissues were measured. Fresh liver tissue was used to detect the expression of Egr-1mRNA, ET-1 mRNA and Bax mRNA by RT-PCR. Paraffin-embedded liver specimen were used to histological change(HE), apoptosis (TUNEL) and the protein expression of ET-1,TNF-α, Bax. Six rats at each time pointing in each group were studied.
     Results:
     1. One week survival rate of the group A,B,C,D and E were 8.33%(1/12),33.3%(4/12) , 58. 7%(7/12), 83. 3%(10/12),100%(12/12), respectively.The differences were statistically significant, p<0.05.
     2. The portal pressure in group C and group D were lower than those in group A and group B before transplantation (8.21,8.15 vs. 10.28,10.55,p=0.019) . There was a significant increase of portal pressure in each groups at 5 and 15 minutes after reperfusion compared with the baseline. This increase in portal pressure reached a peak at 15 minutes (increased by 65.5% in group A and group B, 23.1% in group C and group D, 18.11, 18.55 vs. 15.76, 15.80 , p<0.05), gradually subsided after 30 minutes of reperfusion. The portal pressure of group C and group D were relative stable after reperfusion. The portal pressure in group C and group D were lower than those in group A and group B at 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after reperfusion. p<0.05.
     3. Biochemical data showed that the levels of hepatic enzymes(ALT and AST) reached the peak at 6 hours after reperfusion in each group. At 6 and 24 hours after reperfusion, the ALT and AST levels in group A were the highest in four groups, followed by group B, group C, group D and group E. P<0.05.
     4. H&E staining revealed that the hepatic lobular Architecture was well preserved in group D and group C at 6 hours and 24 hours after reperfusion. The hepatocytes and portal tracts showed normal morphological features. On the contrary,detachment of vascular endothelial cells together with patchy necrosis was present in the group A and group B at 6 hours after reperfusion. Focal necrosis was found mainly around the portal tract in the group A and group B at 24 hours after reperfusion.
     5. RT-PCR showed that the intragraft expression of Egr-1mRNA, ET-1 mRNA and Bax mRNA in group E were the lowest at each time point after reperfusion among the five groups, followed by group D, group C, group B and group A. p<0.05.
     6. The content of MDA after reperfusion was increased by time, inversely; the level of SOD was decreasing by time. The content of MDA in group E were the lowest at each time point after reperfusion among the five groups, followed by group D, group C, group B,and group A. The level of SOD in group E were the highest at each time point after reperfusion among five groups, followed by group D , group C, group B,and group A . p<0.05.
     7. Immunohistochemical results showed that the intragraft expression of ET-1, TNF-αand BAX in group E were the lowest at each time point after reperfusion among the five groups, followed by group D, group C, group B and group A. p<0.05.
     8. TUNEL results showed that the apoptotic index of group E was the lowest at each time point after reperfusion among the fiver groups, followed by group D, group C, group B and group A.p<0.05.
     Conclusion:
     1. The transient significant increase portal hypertention and ischemia reperfusion injury at the early phase after reperfusion were two significant contributors to the hepatic injury of marginal size liver graft in the rat liver transplantation mole using marginal size graft.
     2. In the two significant contributors to the hepatic injury of marginal size liver graft in the rat liver transplantation mole using marginal size graft, irreversible endothelial injury by transient significant increase portal hypertention at the early phase was more harmful to ischemia reperfusion injury .
     3. For two contributors above, IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE could diminish acute phase injury in marginal size liver graft after reperfusion by anenuating the acute phase shear stress that resulted from transient increase portal hypertention and reduced ischemia reperfusion injury.This two protective methods used together were more effective to one method only.
     PART 3 EFFECT OF IRBESARTAN AND EDARAVONE ON LIVER REGENERATION ON MARGINAL SIZE LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN RATS
     Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE on liver regeneration in marginal size liver transplantation in rat.
     Methods: The previously described rat model of nonarterialized liver transplantation using marginal size graft was used. Survived recipients were divided into three group: group A, EDARAVONE treatment group; groupB, IRBESARTAN treatment group; group C, IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE treatment group. Six rats in each group were sacrificed randomly at 2 and 7 days after reperfusion respectively. Each graft was removed and weighed. The regenerative response of liver graft was evaluated by the expression of Ki-67 antigen in hepatocyte that was measured by immunohistochemistry assay.
     Results:
     1. On 2 and 7 days after transplantation the wet weight of graft and liver regeneration rate in IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE treatment group was the highest in three groups, followed by IRBESARTAN treatment group and EDARAVONE treatment group. p<0.05.
     2. Ki-67 labeling index of the graft reach a peak at 2 days after transplantation in three groups. The Ki-67 labeling index of the graft in IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE treatment group was the higheset in three groups on 2 days and 7days after transplantation, followed by IRBESARTAN treatment group and EDARAVONE treatment group. p<0.05.
     Conclusions
     1. IRBESARTAN and EDARAVONE have no directly effect on hepatocyte regeneration in rat liver transplantation model using marginal size graft. It might protect the marginal size graft by reducing portal pressure and ischemia reperfusion injury. This two protective methods used together were more effective to one method only on hepatocyte regeneration.
     2. On hepatocyte regeneration in rat liver transplantation model using marginal size graft, reducing portal pressure was more effective to reducing ischemia reperfusion injury.
引文
[1] Sugawara Y,Makuuchi M. Living donor liver transplantation: present status and recent advances. Br. Med. Bull.,2006,75-76(1): 15-28.
    [2] Muller S A,Mehrabi A,Schmied B M, etc. Partial liver transplantation- living donor liver transplantation and split liver transplantation. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2007, 22(suppl 8): 13-22.
    [3] Smith B. Segmental liver transplantation from a living donor. J Pediatr Surg, 1969, 4(1): 126-132.
    [4] Strong R W, Lynch S V, Ong T H, etc. Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N. Engl. J. Med. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 322(21): 1505-1507.
    [5] Fujita S, Kim I D, Uryuhara K, etc. Hepatic grafts from live donors: donor morbidity for 470 cases of live donation. Transpl Int, 2000, 13(5): 333-339.
    [6] Liu C L, Fan S T. Adult-to-adult live-donor liver transplantation: the current status. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2006, 13(2): 110-116.
    [7] Lo C M. Complications and long-term outcome of living liver donors: a survey of 1,508 cases in five Asian centers. Transplantation, 2003, 75(3 Suppl): 12-15.
    [8]王学浩,杜竞辉.活性供肝原位部分肝移植一例报告.中华器官移植杂志, 1995, 16(3): 133-134.
    [9]严律南,李波,曾勇,等.成人间活体肝移植研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版), 2006; 37(1)∶88
    [10] Trotter J F, Wachs M, Everson G T, etc. Adult-to-Adult Transplantation of the Right Hepatic Lobe from a Living Donor. N. Engl. J. Med., 2002, 346(14): 1074-1082.
    [11] Beavers K L, Sandler R S, Shrestha R. Donor morbidity associated with right lobectomy for living donor liver transplantation to adult recipients: a systematic review. Liver Transpl, 2002, 8(2): 110-117.
    [12] Tuttle-newhall J E, Collins B H, Desai D M, etc. The current status of living donor liver transplantation. Curr Probl Surg, 2005, 42(3): 144-183.
    [13] Shah S A, Grant D R, Greig P D, etc. Analysis and outcomes of right lobe hepatectomy in 101 consecutive living donors. Am J Transplant, 2005, 5(11): 2764-2769.
    [14] Liu B, Yan L N, Wang W T, etc. Clinical study on safety of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in both donors and recipients. World J Gastroenterol, 2007, 13(6): 955-959.
    [15] Bramstedt K A. Living liver donor mortality: where do we stand? Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101(4): 755-759.
    [16] Strong R W. Whither living donor liver transplantation? Liver Transpl Surg, 1999, 5(6): 536-538.
    [17] Beavers K L, Sandler R S, Fair J H, etc. The living donor experience: donor health assessment and outcomes after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl, 2001, 7(11): 943-947.
    [18] Broering D C, Mueller L, Ganschow R, etc. Is there still a need for living-related liver transplantation in children? Ann Surg, 2001, 234(6): 713-217212.
    [19] Miller C, Florman S, Kim-schluger L, etc. Fulminant and fatal gas gangrene of the stomach in a healthy live liver donor. Liver Transpl, 2004, 10(10): 1315-1319.
    [20] Malago M, Rogiers X, Burdelski M, etc. Living related liver transplantation: 36 cases at the University of Hamburg. Transplant Proc, 1994, 26(6):3620-3621.
    [21] Malago M, Testa G, Frilling A, etc. Right living donor liver transplantation: an option for adult patients: single institution experience with 74 patients. Ann Surg, 2003, 238(6): 853-628623.
    [22] Akabayashi A, Slingsby B T, Fujita M. The first donor death after living-related liver transplantation in Japan. Transplantation, 2004, 77(4): 634.
    [23] Kiuchi T,Tanaka K,Ito T,et al.Small-for-size graft in living doner liver transplantation:how far should we go[J].Liver Transpl,2003,9(9):29-35
    [24]卢景宁,彭民浩等。直视下建立大鼠全血供原位肝移植模型。广西医科大学学报,2007,23(4):548-549.
    [25] Van T D, Hagler N G, Schade R R, etc. In vivo hepatic volume determination using sonography and computed tomography. Validation and a comparison of the two techniques. Gastroenterology, 1985, 88(6): 1812-1817.
    [26] Yamaguchi Y, Kikuchi N, Miyanari N, etc. Technique for orthotopic reduced-size hepatic transplantation combined with ex vivo liver cut down in the rat. Dig Dis Sci, 1996, 41(9): 1713-1721.
    [27] Omura T, Ascher N L, Emond J C. Fifty-percent partial liver transplantation in the rat. Transplantation, 1996, 62(2): 292-293.
    [28]叶晟,韩本立,董家鸿.大鼠系列减体积原位肝移植的实验研究.肝胆外科杂志, 2003, 11(3): 220-223.
    [29] Kamada N, Calne R Y. Orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat. Technique using cuff for portal vein anastomosis and biliary drainage. Transplantation, 1979, 28(1): 47-50.
    [30] Lo C M, Fan S T, Liu C L, etc. Minimum graft size for successful livingdonor liver transplantation. Transplantation, 1999, 68(8): 1112-1116.
    [31] Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, etc. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplan- tation, 1999, 67(2): 321-327.
    [32] Xu H S, Pruett T L, Jones R S. Study of donor-recipient liver size match for transplantation. Ann Surg, 1994, 219(1): 46-50.
    [33] Man K, Lo C M, Ng I O, etc. Liver Transplantation in Rats Using Small- for-Size Grafts: A Study of Hemodynamic and Morphological Changes. Arch Surg, 2001, 136(3): 280-285.
    [34] Kiuchi T, Tanaka K, Ito T, etc. Small-for-size graft in living donor liver transplantation: how far should we go? Liver Transpl, 2003, 9(9): 29-35.
    [35] Kelly D M, Demetris A J, Fung J J, etc. Porcine partial liver transplantation: a novel model of the "small-for-size" liver graft. Liver Transpl, 2004, 10(2): 253-263.
    [36] Troisi R, Ricciardi S, Smeets P, etc. Effects of hemi-portocaval shunts for inflow modulation on the outcome of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2005, 5(6): 1397-1404.
    [37] Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien P A. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant, 2005, 5(11): 2605-2610.
    [38] Tucker O N, Heaton N. The 'small for size' liver syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2005, 11(2): 150-155.
    [39] Shen, Zheng S S, Park, etc. liver regeneration after transplantation. FASEB J, 2007, 21(6): A1136-d-1137.
    [1] Man K, Lo C M, Ng I O, etc. Liver Transplantation in Rats Using Small- for-Size Grafts: A Study of Hemodynamic and Morphological Changes. Arch Surg, 2001, 136(3): 280-285.
    [2] Man K, Lee T K, Liang T B, etc. FK 409 ameliorates small-for-size liver graft injury by attenuation of portal hypertension and down-regulation of Egr-1 pathway. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(1): 159-168.
    [3] Xu X, Man K, Zheng S S, etc. Attenuation of acute phase shear stress by somatostatin improves small-for-size liver graft survival. Liver Transpl, 2006, 12(4): 621-627.
    [4] Ito T, Kiuchi T, Yamamoto H, etc. Changes in portal venous pressure in the early phase after living donor liver transplantation: pathogenesis and clinical implications. Transplantation, 2003, 75(8): 1313-1317.
    [5] Xu X, Man K, Zheng S S, et al. Attenuation of acute phase shear stress by somatostatin improves small-for-size liver graftsurvival [J]. Liver Transpl, 2006, 12(4): 621-627.
    [6]游伟,李相成,马跃锋,姚爱华,王学浩.一氧化氮促释放剂在保护大鼠减体积肝移植后缺血再灌注损伤中的作用.南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 26(7): 526-530.
    [7]霍丽娟,黄会芳等.缬沙坦降低大鼠肝硬化门静脉高压的实验研究[J].中华消化杂志, 2006, 26 (4) :258 - 259.
    [8] Park DH, Baik SK, Choi YH, et al . Inhibitory effect of angiotensin blockade on hepatic fibrosis in common bile duct-ligated rats[J ] . Korean J Hepatol, 2007, 13 (1) :61 - 69.
    [9]魏红山,李定国,陆汉明,等.肾素-血管紧张素系统与肝纤维化发生[J].中华消化杂志,2006 ,21 (3) :145 - 147.
    [10] Castano G,Viudez P ,Riccitelli M. A randomized study of losartan vs propranolol : Effects on hepatic and systemic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients[J ] . Ann Hepatol ,2003 ,2 (1) :36 - 40.
    [11] Yalniz M, Demir A, Arslan A, et al . Short term effects of valsartan on portal blood flow in cirrhotic patients [J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2003, 14 (1) :18 - 25.
    [12] Debernardi-Venon W, Barletti C, Alessandria C, et al. Efficacy of irbesartan , a receptor selective antagonist of angiotensinⅡ, in reducing portal hypertension[J] . Dig Dis Sci, 2002, 47 (2) :401- 404.
    [13] Schepke M, Werner E, Biecker E, et al . Hemodynamic effects of the angiotensinⅡreceptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension [J] . Gastroenterology , 2001 ,121 (2) :389 - 395.
    [14] Heller J, Shiozawa T, Trebicka J, et al. Acute haemodynamic effects of losartan in anaesthetized cirrhotic rats[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2003, 33 (11) :1006 - 1012.
    [15] Noor JI,Ueda Y,Ikeda T,et al.Edaravone inhibits lipid peroxidation in neonatal hypoxic-isehemic rats:An in vivo microdialysis study.Neurosci Lett,2007,414(l):5-9.
    [16] Noor JI,Ikeda T,Ueda Y,et al.A free radical scavenger,edaravone,inhibits lipid peroxidation and the production of nitric oxide in hypoxic- ischemic brain damage of neonatal rats.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005,193 (5): 1703-1708.
    [17] Suzuki T , Kazui T,Yamamoto S , et al.Effect of prophylactically administered edaravone during antegrade cerebral perfusion in a canine model of old cerebral infarction.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2007,133(3):710-716.
    [18] Yoshida H,Yanai H,Namlki Y,et al.Neuroprotective effects of edaravone:a novel free radical scavenger in cerebrovascular injury. CNS Drug Rev,2006,12(l):9-20.
    [19] Dohi K,Satoh K.Mihara Y,et al.Alkoxyl radical—scavenging activity of edaravone in patients with traumatic brain injury.J Neurotrauma,2006,23(11):1591-1599.
    [20] Watanabe K,Ma M,Wen J,et al.Effects of edaravone in heart of aged rats after cerebral ischermia-reperfusion injury.Biol Pharm Bull , 2007 ,30(3):460-464.
    [21] Tsuji K, KwonA H,YOshidaH,etal.Free radical scavenger(edaravone) Prevents endotoxi-induced liver injury after partial hepatectomy in rats.J Hepatol,2005,42(l):94-101.
    [22] Abe T,Unno M,Takeuchi H,etal. A new free radical scavengeredaravone,ameliorates oxidativeliver damage due to ischemia-reperfusion in vitro and in vivo.J Gastrointest Surg,2004,8(5):604-615.
    [23] Taniguchi M, Uchinami M,Doi K,et al.Edaravone reduces ischemia- reperfusion injury mediators in rat liver.J Surg Res,2007,137(l):69-74.
    [24] Tomatsuri N,Yoshida N,Takagi T,etal.Edaravone,a newly developed radical scavenger,protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury of the small intestine in rats.Int J Mol Med ,2004,13(l):105-109.
    [25] Araki Y,Sugihara H,Hattori T. The free radical scavengers edaravone and tempol suppress experimental dextran sulfate sodium一induced colitis in mice.Int J Mol Med,2006,17(2):331-334.
    [26] Yamawaki M,Sasaki N,Shimoyama M,et al.Protective effect of edaravone against hypoxia-reoxygenation injury in rabbit cardiomyocytes.Br JPharmacol,2004,142(3):618-626.
    [27] Onogi H,Minatoguchi S,Chen XH,et al. Edaravone reduces myocardial infarct size and improves cardiac function and rermodelling in rabbits.Clin Exp Phamacol Physiol,2006,33(11):1035-1041.
    [28] Tsujita K, Shimomura H,Kawano H, et al.Effects of edaravone on reperfusion injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol,2004,94(4):481-484.
    [29] Fukuda A,Okubo S,Tanabe Y,etal. Cardioprotective effect of edaravone against ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the rabbit heart before,during and after reperfusion treatment.J Int Med Res,2006,34(5):475-484.
    [30] Doi K,Suzuki Y,Nakao A,etal. Radical scavenger edaravone developed for clinical use ameliorates ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat kidney.Kidney lnt,2004,65(5):1714-1723.
    [31] Satoh M,Kashihara N,Fujimoto S,et al.A novel free radical scavenger,edarabone,protects against cisplatin- induced acute renal damage in vitro and in vivo.J Pharmacol Exo Ther,2003,305(3):1183-1190.
    [32] Kamada N,Calne RY.Orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat:technique using cuff for portal vein anastomosis and biliary drainage[J]. Transplantation, 1979, 28(1):47-50.
    [33] Miyata M,Fischer JH,Fuhs M,et al.A simple method for liver transplantation in the rat[J].Transplantation,1980,29(5):335-338.
    [35] Xu H S, Pruett T L, Jones R S. Study of donor-recipient liver size match for transplantation. Ann Surg, 1994, 219(1): 46-50.
    [36] Zhao Y, Man K, Lo C M, etc. Attenuation of small-for-size liver graft injury by FTY720: significance of cell-survival Akt signaling pathway. Am J Transplant, 2004, 4(9): 1399-1407.
    [37] Asakura T, Ohkohchi N, Orii T, etc. Portal vein pressure is the key for successful liver transplantation of an extremely small graft in the pig model. Transpl Int, 2003, 16(6): 376-382.
    [38] Nishizaki T, Ikegami T, Hiroshige S, etc. Small graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg, 2001, 233(4): 575-580.
    [39] Garcia-valdecasas J C, Fuster J, Charco R, etc. Changes in portal vein flow after adult living-donor liver transplantation: does it influence postoperative liver function? Liver Transpl, 2003, 9(6): 564-569.
    [40] Troisi R, De H B. Clinical relevance of adapting portal vein flow in living donor liver transplantation in adult patients. Liver Transpl, 2003, 9(9): 36-41.
    [41] Troisi R, Ricciardi S, Smeets P, etc. Effects of hemi-portocaval shunts for inflow modulation on the outcome of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2005, 5(6): 1397-1404.
    [42] Boillot O, Delafosse B, Mechet I, etc. Small-for-size partial liver graft in an adult recipient; a new transplant technique. Lancet, 2002, 359(9304): 406-407.
    [43] Lo C M, Liu C L, Fan S T. Portal hyperperfusion injury as the cause of primary nonfunction in a small-for-size liver graft-successful treatment with splenic artery ligation. Liver Transpl, 2003, 9(6): 626-628.
    [44] Troisi R, Cammu G, Militerno G, etc. Modulation of portal graft inflow: a necessity in adult living-donor liver transplantation? Ann Surg, 2003, 237(3): 429-436.
    [45] Yan L, Chen Z, Wang W, etc. Successful Treatment With Selective and Transplenic Artery Embolization for Small-for-Size Syndrome:A Case Report. Transplantation, 2007, 84(2): 283-284.
    [46] Jaeschke H.Molecular mechanisms of hepatic ischemia -reperfusion injury and preconditioning. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 2003, 284(1): 15-26.
    [47] Yan SF , Fujita T,Lu J,et al.Egr-1 , a master switch coordinating upregulation of divergent gene families underlying ischemic srtess[J].Nat Med, 2000,6:1355-1361.
    [48] Man K,Lee TK,Liang TB,et al. FK 409 ameliorates small-for-size liver graft injury by attenuation of portal hypertension and down-regulation of Egr-1 pathway. Ann Surg. 2004 Jul;240(1):159-68.
    [49] Man K, Lo CM,Ng IOL, et al. Liver transplantation in rats using small- for-size grafts:a study of hemodynamic and morphological changes[J].Arch Surg,2001,136:280-285.
    [50] Chiu JJ,Wung BS,Hsieh HJ,et al.Nitric oxide regulates shear sterss induced early growth response-1.Expression via the extracellular singal reuglated kdinase pathway in endothelial cells[J].Circ Res,1999,85:238-246.
    [51] Toyakazu I,Natskui S,Yasushi K,et al.Eeffct of FK4O9,a novel nitric oxide donor,on acute experimental myocardial ischemia[J].TheJapanese Jounral of Pharmcology,1993,62(3):315-324.
    [52] Jhoji F,Stefano S,Ivan T,et al.FK409,a spontaneous nitric oxide releaser,attenuates allograft vasculopathy in a rat aortic transplant model[J]. Circulation Research,2000,87(1):66-72.
    [53] Pritchard MT, Roychowdhury S, McMullen MR, Guo L, Arteel GE, Nagy LE. Early growth response-1 contributes to galactosamine/ lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver injury in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007 Dec;293(6):G1124-33.
    [54] Menger MD,Rchter S,Yamauchi J,et al.Role of microcirculation in hepaticischemia/reperfusion injury.Hepatogastroenterology,1999,46(Suppl 2): 1452-1457.
    [55] Oda M,Han JY,Yokomori H.Local regulators of hepatic sinusoidal microcirculation:recent advances.Clin Hemorheol Microcirc,2000,23(24): 85-94.
    [56] Roekey DC.Hepatic blood flow regulation by stellate cells in normal and injured liver.Semin Liver Dis,2001,21(3):337-349.
    [57] Dhar DK,Yamanoi A,Ohmori H,et al.Modulation of endothelin and nitric oxide:a rational approach to improve canine hepatic microcireulation. Hepatology,1998,28(3):782-788.
    [58] Uhlmann D,Uhlmann S,Spiegel HU.Important role for endothelins in acute hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury.J Invest Surg,200l,14(1):31-45.
    [59] Rockeyl DC. Hepatic blood flow regulation by stellate cells in normal and injured liver.Semin Liver Dis,2001,21(3):337-349.
    [60] Mallat A.Hepatic stellate cells and intrahepatic modulation of portal pressure.Digestion,1998,59(4):416-419.
    [61] Gandhi CR,Sproat LA,Subbotin VM,et al. Increased hepatic endothelin-l levels and endothelin receptor density in cirrhotic rats.Life Sci,1996,58:55-62.
    [62] Ohara N,Futagawa S,Watanabe S,et al.Clinical investigation of endothelin-1 and nitric oxide in patients with portal hypertension focusing on plasma levels and immunohistological staining of liver tissues.Hepatol Res,2001,21(l):40-54.
    [63] Kraus T,Golling M,Mehrabi A,et al.Endothelin-l and big-endothelin concentrations are elevated in liver graft tissue during cold storage and reperfusion.Eur Surg Res,2001,33(l):l-7.
    [64] Pedrosa ME,Montero EF,Nigro AJ.Liver microcirculation after selective denervation.Microsurgery,2001,21(4):163-165.
    [65] Schemmer P,Bunzendahl H,Raleigh JA,et al.Graft survival is improved by hepatic denervation before organ harvesting.Transplantation , 1999 ,67(10):1301-1307.
    [66] Kamegaya Y,Oda M,Yokomori H,et al.Role of endothelin receptors in endothelin-1-induced morphological changes of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial fenestrae:morphometric evaluation with scanning electron microscopy.Hepatol Res,2002,22(2):89-101.
    [67] I sobe M,Katsuramaki T,Kimura H,et al.Correlation between nitric oxide and endothelin after prolonged warm ischemia-repe rfusion injury in pig livers.Transplant Proc,1998,30(7):3750-3753.
    [68] Katsuramaki T,Isobe M,Kimura H,et al.Different changes of endothelin-l after reperfusion in a warm isehemia/reperfusion and transplantation model in pig liver.Transplant Proc,2000,32(7):2277-2278.
    [69] Peralta C,Bulbena O , Bargallo R ,etal. Strategies to modulate the deleterious effects of endothelin in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion. Transplantation,2000,70(12):1761-1770.
    [70] Ricciardi R,Schaffer BK,Shah SA,et al.Bosentan,an endothelin antagonist augments hepatic graft function by reducing graft circulatoly impairment following ischemial/reperfusion injury口.J Gastrointest Surg,2001,5(3): 322-329.
    [71] Lentsch AB,Kato A,Yoshidome H,et al.Inflammatory mechanisms and therapeutic Strategies for warm hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injuly. Hepatology,2000,32(2):169-173.
    [72] Sindram D,Rudiger HA.Upadhya AG,et al.Ischemic preconditioningprotects against cold ischemic injury through an oxidative stress dependent mechanism.J Hepatol,2002,36(l):78-84.
    [73]Man K,Lo CM,Ng IO,et al.Liver transplantation in rats using small- for-size graft:a study of hemodynamic and morphological changes.Arch Surg,200l,136(3):280-285.
    [74] Lo CM, Fan ST, Chan JK, et al.Minimum gaft volume for successful adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure. Transplantation,1996,62(5):696-698.
    [75] Tomita K, Tamiya G, Ando S, etc. Tumour necrosis factor {alpha} signalling through activation of Kupffer cells plays an essential role in liver fibrosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Gut, 2006, 55(3): 415-424.
    [76] Fugger R, Hamilton G, Steininger R, etc. Intraoperative estimation of endotoxin, TNF alpha, and IL-6 in orthotopic liver transplantation and their relation to rejection and postoperative infection. Transplantation, 1991, 52(2): 302-306.
    [77] Tange S, Hofer Y, Welte M, etc. Local secretion of TNF-alpha from the liver does not correlate with endotoxin, IL-6, or organ function in the early phase after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl Int, 2001, 14(2): 80-86.
    [78] Ohkohchi N, Shibuya H, Tsukamoto S, etc. Kupffer's cells modulate neutrophile activity by superoxide anion and tumor necrosis factor-delta in reperfusion injury of liver transplantation-mechanisms of radical generation and reperfusion injury after cold ischemia. Transplant Proc, 1999, 31(1-2): 1055-1058.
    [79] Cutrn J C, Perrelli M G, Cavalieri B, etc. Microvascular dysfunction induced by reperfusion injury and protective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Free Radic Biol Med, 2002, 33(9): 1200-1208.
    [80] Grenz A, Schenk M, Zipfel A, etc. TNF-alpha and its receptors mediate graft rejection and loss after liver transplantation. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2000, 38(11): 1183-1185.
    [81] Tashiro H, Itamoto T, Ohdan H, etc. Involvement of tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor 1 and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis- inducing ligand-(TRAIL) receptor-2/DR-5, but not Fas, in graft injury in live-donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int, 2004, 17(10): 626-633.
    [82] Takei Y, Marzi I, Kauffman F C, etc. Increase in survival time of liver transplants by protease inhibitors and a calcium channel blocker, nisoldipine. Transplantation, 1990, 50(1): 14-20.
    [83] Tian Y, Jochum W, Georgiev P, etc. Kupffer cell-dependent TNF-{alpha} signaling mediates injury in the arterialized small-for-size liver transplantation in the mouse. PNAS, 2006, 103(12): 4598-4603.
    [84] Teoh N, Field J, Sutton J, etc. Dual role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: studies in tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene knockout mice. Hepatology, 2004, 39(2): 412-421.
    [85] Sato T, et al. Interactions among members of the Bcl-2 protein family analyzed with a yeast two-hybrid system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 1(9):238-239,242
    [86] Kren BT, Trembley JH, Krajewski S, et al. Mudulation of apoptosis- associated genes bcl-2, bcl-x, and bax during rat liver regeneration. Cell Growth Differ. 1996, 7(12):1633-42
    [87] Chen N, Deng T, Chen P, et al. The regulationof apoptosis by Bcl-2, bcl-X(L), Bcl-2alpha and Bax in chronic liver disease. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi.2000,39(12):808-10
    [88] Gu X, Li Q, Wang Y. Expression of bcl-2, bax and hepatocyteapoptosis in the liver tissues of hepatitis D patients. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 2001 ,9(2):81-3
    [89]Ishigami F, Naka S, Takeshita K, et al. Bile salt tauroursodeoxycholic acid modulation of Bax translocation to mitochondria protects the liver from warm ischemia- reperfusion injury in the rat. Transplantation, 2001,72(11):1803-7
    [90] Doi Y, Hamazaki K, Yabuki M, et al. Effect of HSP70 induced by warm ischemia to the liver on liver function after partial hepatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2001,48(38):533-540.
    [1] Michalopoulos G K, Defrances M C. Liver Regeneration. Science Science, 1997, 276(5309): 60-66.
    [2] Court F G, Wemyss-holden S A, Dennison A R, etc. The mystery of liver regeneration. Br J Surg, 2002, 89(9): 1089-1095.
    [3] Fausto N, Campbell J S, Riehle K J. Liver regeneration. Hepatology, 2006, 43(2 Suppl 1): 45-53.
    [4] Fausto N, Riehle K J. Mechanisms of liver regeneration and their clinical implications. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2005, 12(3): 181-189.
    [5] Marcos A, Fisher R A, Ham J M, etc. Liver regeneration and function in donor and recipient after right lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation, 2000, 69(7): 1375-1379.
    [6] Bucher N L. Regeneration of mammalian liver. Int Rev Cytol, 1963, 15: 245-300.
    [7] Taub R. Liver regeneration: from myth to mechanism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2004, 5(10): 836-847.
    [8] Christophi C, Harun N, Fifis T. Liver regeneration and tumor stimulation-a review of cytokine and angiogenic factors. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008, 12(5): 966-980.
    [9] He H, Tan C K, Downey K M, etc. A tumor necrosis factor alpha - and interleukin 6-inducible protein that interacts with the small subunit of DNA polymerase delta and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. PNAS, 2001, 98(21): 11979-11984.
    [10] Iwai M, Cui T X, Kitamura H, etc. Increased secretion of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin 6 from isolated, perfused liver of rats after partialhepatectomy. Cytokine, 2001, 13(1): 60-64.
    [11] Nakamura T, Sakata R, Ueno T, etc. Inhibition of transforming growth factor beta prevents progression of liver fibrosis and enhances hepatocyte regeneration in dimethylnitrosamine-treated rats. Hepatology, 2000, 32(2): 247-255.
    [12] Debonera F, Aldeguer X, Shen X, etc. Activation of interleukin-6/STAT3 and liver regeneration following transplantation. J Surg Res, 2001, 96(2): 289-295.
    [13] Tanaka K, Ogura Y. "Small-for-size graft" and "small-for-size syndrome" in living donor liver transplantation. Yonsei Med J, 2004, 45(6): 1089-1094.
    [14] Kiuchi T, Oike F, Yamamoto H. Small-for-size graft in liver transplantation. Nagoya J Med Sci, 2003, 66(3-4): 95-102.
    [15] Clavien P A, Petrowsky H, Deoliveira M L, etc. Strategies for Safer Liver Surgery and Partial Liver Transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007, 356(15): 1545-1559.
    [16] Man K, Lo C M, Ng I O, etc. Liver Transplantation in Rats Using Small-for-Size Grafts: A Study of Hemodynamic and Morphological Changes. Arch Surg Archives of Surgery, 2001, 136(3): 280-285.
    [17] Tucker O N, Heaton N. The 'small for size' liver syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2005, 11(2): 150-155.
    [18] Xu X, Man K, Zheng S S, etc. Attenuation of acute phase shear stress by somatostatin improves small-for-size liver graft survival. Liver Transpl, 2006, 12(4): 621-627.
    [19]王天才,周峻峰,刘辉, etc.特立加压素和垂体后叶素对肝硬化大鼠门脉压力及胃粘膜血流量的影响. 2002, 31(3): 256-258.
    [20] Oberti F, Veal N, Kaassis M, etc. Hemodynamic effects of terlipressin and octreotide administration alone or in combination in portal hypertensive rats. J Hepatol, 1998, 29(1): 103-111.
    [21] Fausto N. Liver regeneration. J Hepatol, 2000, 32(1 Suppl): 19-31.
    [22] Kountouras J, Boura P, Lygidakis N J. Liver regeneration after hepatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology, 2001, 48(38): 556-562.
    [23] Yamada Y, Webber E M, Kirillova I, etc. Analysis of liver regeneration in mice lacking type 1 or type 2 tumor necrosis factor receptor: requirement for type 1 but not type 2 receptor. Hepatology, 1998, 28(4): 959-970.
    [24] Selzner N, Selzner M, Tian Y, etc. Cold ischemia decreases liver regeneration after partial liver transplantation in the rat: A TNF-alpha/IL-6- dependent mechanism. Hepatology, 2002, 36(4 Pt 1): 812-818.
    [25] Bedirli A, Kerem M, Pasaoglu H, etc. Effects of ischemic preconditioning on regenerative capacity of hepatocyte in the ischemically damaged rat livers. J Surg Res, 2005, 125(1): 42-48.
    [26] Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol, 2000, 182(3): 311-322.
    [27] Endl E, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: fascinating forms and an unknown function. Exp Cell Res, 2000, 257(2): 231-237.
    [28] Gerlach C, Sakkab D Y, Scholzen T, etc. Ki-67 expression during rat liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Hepatology, 1997, 26(3): 573-578.
    [29] Gerdes J, Schwab U, Lemke H, etc. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation. Int J Cancer, 1983, 31(1): 13-20.
    [30] Cattoretti G, Becker M H, Key G, etc. Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki-67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3) detectproliferating cells in microwave-processed formalin-fixed paraffin sections. J Pathol, 1992, 168(4): 357-363.
    [31] Haga J, Shimazu M,Wakabayashi G, et al. Liver regeneration in donors and adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation Liver Transpl. 2008 Dec; 14(12):1718-24
    [1] Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M. Living donor liver transplantation: present status and recent advances. Br. Med. Bull. 2006, 75-76(1): 15-28.
    [2] Smith B. Segmental liver transplantation from a living donor. J Pediatr Surg, 1969, 4(1): 126-132.
    [3] Raia S, Nery JR, Mies S. Liver transplantation from live donors [J]. Lancet, 1989; 2(8661)∶497
    [4] Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TH, Matsunami H, Koido Y, Balderson GA. Suecessful livertransPlantation from a livingdonor to her son.N Engl J Med.1990:22(21):1505-1507.
    [5] Fujita S, Kim ID, Uryuhara K,et al. Hepatic grafts from livedonors: donor morbidity for 470 cases of live donation [J].Transpl Int, 2000; 13(5)∶333
    [6] Broelsch CE, Emond JC, Whitington PF,et al. Application reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotografts, and living related segmental transplants [J]. Ann Sur1990; 212(3)∶368
    [7] Broelsch CE, Whitington PF, Emond JC,et al. Liver tranplantation in children from living related donors. Surgical tecniques and results [J]. Ann Surg, 1991; 214(4)∶428
    [8] Broelsch CE, Stevens LH, Whitington PF. The use of reduce size liver transplants in children, including split livers and livirelated liver transplants [J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 1991; 1(3)166
    [9] Yamaoka Y, Tanaka K, Ozawa K. Liver transplantation from living-related donors [J]. Clin Transpl, 1993; 1∶179
    [10] Yamaoka Y, Washida M, Honda K,et al. Liver transplanta-tion using a right lobe graft from a living related donor [J].Transplantation, 1994; 57(7)∶1127
    [11] Wachs ME, Bak TE, Karrer FM, etal. Adult living donor liver transplantation using a right hepatic lobe [J]. Transplantation, 1998; 66:1313
    [12] Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL,etal. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transp- lantation using extended right lobe grafts [J]. Ann Surg, 1997; 226(3):261
    [13] Marcos A, Fisher RA, Ham JM,etal. Right lobe living donor liver transplantation [J]. Transplantation, 1999; 68(6):79818
    [14] Trotter JF, Wachs M, Trouillot T,etal. Evaluation of 100 patients for living donor liver transplantation [J]. Liver Transpl,2000; 6(3):290
    [15] Williams RS, Alisa AA, Karani JB. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant: UK experience [J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003; 15(1):7
    [16] Orloff M, Bozorgzadeh A, Lansing K,etal. Post-operative liver dysfunction following donation of segmental liver grafts [J].Am J Transplant, 2004; 4(Suppl 8):532
    [17] Rinella ME,Alonso E,Rao S,Whltington P,Fryer J,Abeeassis M,Superina R,Flamm SL,Blei AT.Body mass index as a predietor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors.Liver TransPL.2001;7(5):409-414.
    [18] Sugawara Y,Makuuchi M.Small-for- size graft problems in adult to- adultliving- donor livertransplantation.TransPlaniation .2003;75:20-22.
    [19]王学浩,杜竞辉,张峰,等.活体供肝原位部分肝移植一例报告[J].中华器官移植杂志, 1995; 16(3):133
    [20]严律南.文天夫,李波,等.成人-成人活体肝移植一例报告[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2002; 8(10):634
    [21] Kiuchi T, Tanaka K, Ito T, et al. Small-for-size graft in living doner liver transplantation:how far should we go[J].Liver Transpl,2003,9(9):29-35
    [22] Tanaka K,Ogura Y.“Small-for-size graft”and“small-for-size syndrome”in living donor livertransplantation.Yonsei Med J- 2004; 45:1089- 1094.
    [23] HeatonN.Small-for-size liver syndrome after auxillary and split liver transplantation:donor selection.Liver Transpl.2003;9:26-28.
    [24] Dahm F,Georgiev P,Clavien PA.Smalll-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation:definition,mechanisms of disease and clinical implications [J], Am J Transplant,2005,5(11):2605-2610.
    [25] Kam I, Lynch S, Svanas G, et al.Evidence that host size determines liver size:studies in dogs receiving orthotopic liver transplants[J]. Hepatology, 1987,7(2):362-366.
    [26] Chang TH,Hakamada K,Toyoki Y,et al.Expression of MRP2 and MRP3 during liver regenation after 90% partial hepatectomy in rats[J]. Transplantation, 2004, 77(1):22-27.
    [27] Shirakata Y, Terajima H, Mashima S,Inomoto T, Nishizawa F, Saad S,Hong SJ,Morimoto T,Inamoto T,Yamaoka Y.The minimum graft size for successful orthotopic partial livertransplantation in the canine model. Transplant Proe1995;27:545-546.
    [28] Lerut JP,Ciccarelli O,Roggen FM,Reding R,Laterre PF,Lengele B,Janssen M,Chardot C,Clement de Clety S,Danse E,Goffette P,Matterne R,Sokal E,Horsmans Y,Otte JB.Adult-to-adult living related liver transplantation: initial experience.Aeta Gastroenterol Belg.2001;64(l):9-14.
    [29] Emond JC,Heffron TG,Kortz EO,Gonzalez-Vallina R,Contis JC, Black DD,Whitington PF.ImProved result sofliving- related liver transplantation with routine application in a pediatric Program. Transplantation. 1993; 55:835.
    [30] Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Imamura H, Dowaki S,MizutaK,Kawarasaki H, Hashizume K.Small-for-size grafts in living-related livertransplantation. J Am Coll Surg.2001;192:510-513.
    [31] Kawasaki S, Makuuehi M,Matsunami H,Hashikura Y,Ikegami T, Nakazawa Y, Chisuwa H,Terada M,Miyagawa S.Living related livertransplaniation in adults.Ann Surg.1998;227:269- 274.
    [32] Dahm F,Georgiev P,Clavien PA.small-for-size syndrome after Partial livertransplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J TransPlant.2005;5(11):2605-2610.
    [33] Ben-Haim M, Emre S, Fishbein TM,etal. Critical graft size inadult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: impact of the recipient’s disease [J]. Liver Transpl, 2001; 7(11)∶948
    [34] Deland FH,North WA .Relationship between liver size and body size.Radiology.1968;91:1195.
    [35] Urata K,Kawasaki S,Matsunami H,Hashikura Y, Ikegami T,Ishizone S,Momose Y, Komiyama A,Makuuehi M.Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for livertransplantation. HePatology. 1995;21:1317.
    [36] Bassignani MJ, Fulcher AS, Szucs RA,et al. Use of imagingfor living donor liver transplantation [J]. Radiographics, 2001;21(1)∶39
    [37] Cheng YF, Chen CL, Huang TL,etal. Single imaging modality evaluation of living donors in liver transplantation: magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Transplantation, 2001; 72(9)∶1527
    [38] Cho JY,Suh KS,Kwon CH,et al.The hepatic regeneration power of mild steatotic grafts is not impaired in living-doner liver transplantation[J].Liver Transpl,2005,11(2):210-217.
    [39] Lo CM,Fan ST,Liu CL,Chan JK,Lam BK,Lau GK,Wei WI , Wong J.Minimum graft size for sueeessful living donor liver transPlantation.TransPlantation.1999;68:1112-1116.
    [40] HeatonN.Small-for-size liver syndrome after auxillary and split liver transplantation:donor selection.Liver Transpl.2003;9:26-28.
    [41] Tanaka K,Ogura Y.“Small-for-size graft”and“small-for-size syndrome”in living donor livertransplantation.Yonsei Med J- 2004;45:1089- 1094.
    [42] Gondolesi GE,Florman S,Matsumoto C,Huang R,FishbeinTM, SheinerPA,SehwartzME , EmreS , ThungS , ShaPiroR , MillerCM. Venous hemodynamics in living donor right lobe liver transplantation.Liver Transpl.2002:8:809-813.
    [43] Smyrniotis V, Kostopanagiotou G,Kondi A,Gamaletsos E,Theodoraki K,Kehagias D,Mystakidou K,Contis J.Hemodynamic interaetion between Portal vein and hepatic artery flow in small-for- size split liver transplantation.Transpl Int.2002;15:355- 360.
    [44] Marcos A, Olzinski AT, Ham JM, Fisher RA, Posner MP. The interrelationship between portal and arterial blood flow after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2000; 70: 1697-1703.
    [45] Man K, Lo CM, Ng I0, Wong YC, Qin LF, Fan ST,Wong J. Liver transplantation in rats using small-for-size grafts.Arch.2001;136:280- 285.
    [46] Man K,Fan ST,Lo CM,Liu CL,Fung PC,Liang TB,Lee TK,Tsui SH,Ng IO,Zhang ZW,Wong J.Graft injury in relation to graft size in right lobe live donor livertransplantation: astudy of hepatic sinusoidal injury in correlation with portal hemodynamics and intragraft gene expression.Ann Surg. 2003; 237:256-264.
    [47] Ito T,Kiuchi T,Yamamoto H,Oike F,Ogura Y,Fujimoto Y,Hirohashi K, Tanaka AK.Changes in portal venous pressure in the early phase afterliving donor liver transplantation:pathogenesis and clinical implications. Transplantation.2003:75:1313-1317.
    [48] Panis Y, McMullan DM, Emond JC. Progressive necrosis after hepatic-tomy and the Pathophysiology of liver failure after massive reseetion.Surgery,1997;121:142-149.
    [49] Marcos A,Fisher RA,Ham JM,et al.Liver regeneration and function in donor and recipent after right lobe to adult living doner liver transplantation[J]. Transplantation,2000,69(7):1375-1379.
    [50] Humar A,Kosari K,Sielaff TD,et al. Liver regeneration after adult living doner and deceased donor split-liver transplants[J].liver Transpl, 2004, 10(3):374-378.
    [51] Eguchi S,Yanaga K,Sugiyama N,et al.Relationship between portal venors flow and liver regeneration in patients after living doner right-lobe liver transplantation[J]. liver Transpl,2003,9(6):547-551.
    [52] Yagi S,Iida T,Taniguchi K,et al.Impact of portal venous pressure on regeneration and graft damage after living-donor transplantation[J]. liver Transpl,2005,11(1):68-75.
    [53] Marubashi S,Sakon M,Nagano H,et al.Effect of portal hemdynamics on liver regeneration studied in a novel portohepatic shunt rat mode[J]. Surgery,2004,136(5):1028-1037.
    [54] Debonera F,Wang G,Xie J,et al.Severe preservation injury induces IL-6/STAT3 activation with lack of cell cycle progression after partial liver graft transplantation[J].Am J Transplant,2004,4(12):1964-1971.
    [55] Rela M,Vougas V,Muiesan P,Vilca-Melendez H,Smyrniotis V,Gibbs P,Karani J,Williams R,Heaton N.Split-liver transplantation:King’s College HosPital experience.Ann Surg,1998,227:282-288.
    [56] Cui D,Kiuchi T,Egawa H,Hayashi M,Sakamoto S,Ueda M,Kaihara S,Uemoto S,Inomata Y,Tanaka K.Microcireulatory changes in right lobe grafts in living-donor liver transplantation:a near- infrared spectrometry study.Transplantation,2001;72:291-295.
    [57] Maetani Y,Itoh K,Egawa H,Shibata T,Ametani F,Kubo T,Kiuchi T,Tanaka K,Konishi J.Factors influencing liver regeneration following living-donor liver transplantation of the right hepatic lobe. Transplantation, 2003; 75: 97-102.
    [58] Shiraishi M,Csete ME,Yasunaga C,Drazan KE,Jurim O,Cramer DV Busuttil RW, Shaked A.Regeneration- induced accelerated rejection in reduced-size liver grafts.Transplantation,1994;57:336-340.
    [59] Inomata Y,Tanaka K,Uemoto S,Asonuma K,Egawa H,Kiuchi T,Fujita S,Hayashi M.Living donor liver transplantation;an 8 year experience with 379 consecutive cases,Transplant.Proc,1999;31:381.
    [60] Ben-Haim M,Emre S,Fishbein TM,et al.Critical graft size in adult to adult living donor liver transplantation:impact of the recipient’s disease[J]. Liver Transpl,2001,7(11),948-953.
    [61] Soejima Y,Shimada M,Suehiro T,et al.Outcome analysis in adult to adult living donor liver transplantation using the left lobe[J]. Liver Transpl, 2003, 9(6),581-586.
    [62] Kiuchi T,Tanaka K,Ito T,Oike F,Ogura Y,Fujimoto Y,Ogawa K.Small-for- size graft in living donor liver transplantation:how far Should we go?Liver Transpl,2003,9:329-335.
    [63] Nishizaki T,Ikegami T,Hiroshige S,Hashimoto K,Uchiyama H,Yoshizumi T,Kishikawa K,Shimada M,Sugimaehi K.Small graft for living donor liver transplantation.Ann Surg,2001;233:575-580.
    [64] Ikegami T,Nishizaki T,Yanaga K,Shimada M,Kakizoe S,Nomoto K,Hiroshige S,Sugimachi K.Changes in the caudate lobe that is transplanted with extended left lobe liver graft from living donors. Surgery, 2001;129:86-90.
    [65] Cattral MS,Molinari M,Vollmer CM Jr,McGilvray I,Wei A,Walsh M,Adcock L,Marks N,Lilly L,Girgrah N,Levy G,Greig PD, Grant DR.Living-donor right hepatectomy with or without inclusion of middle hepatic vein:comparison of morbidity and outeome in 56 patients.Am J Transplant,2004:4:751-757.
    [66] Sugawara Y,Makuuchi M,Takayama T,Mizuta K,Kawarasaki H,Imamura H,HashizumeK.Livertransplantation using a right lateral sector graft from a living donor to her granddaughter. Hepatogastroenterology, 2001; 48: 261-263.
    [67] Sugawara Y,Makuuchi M,Takayama T,Imamura H,Kaneko J. Right lateral sector graft in adult living-related liver transPlantation. Transplantation, 2002; 73:111-114.
    [68] Leelaudomlipi S, Sugawara Y, Kaneko J, Matsui Y, Ohkubo T, Makuuchi M.Volumetric analysis of liver segments in 155living donors. Liver Transpl,2002;8:612-614.
    [69] 34.Moon DB,Lee SG.Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation at the Asan Medieal Center.Yonsei Med J,2004,45(6):1162-1168.
    [70] 35.xLee SG,Park KM,Hwang S,Lee YJ,Kim KH,,Ahn CS,Choi DL,Joo SH,Jeon JY,Chu CW,Moon DB,Min PC,Koh KS,Han SH, Park SH,Choi GT,Hwang KS,Lee EJ,Chung YH,Lee YS,Lee HJ,Kim MH,Lee SK,Suh DJ,Kim JJ,Sung KB.Adult-to adult living donor liver transplantation at the Asan Medical Center,Korea.Asian J Surg, 2002; 25:277-284. [71 ]Inomata Y,Kiuchi T,Kim I,Uemoto S,Egawa H,Asonuma K Fujita S,Hayashi M,Tanaka K.Auxiliary partial orthotopic living donor liver transplantation as an aid for small-for-size grafts in larger recipients. Transplantation,1999;67:1314-1319.
    [72] Lo CM,Liu CL,Fan ST.Portal hyperperfusion injury as the cause of Primary nonfunetion in a small-for-size liver graft successful treatment with splenic artery ligation.Liver transpl,2003;9:626-628.
    [73] Ku Y,Fukumoto T,Nishida T,Tominaga M,Maeda I,Kitagawa T,Takao S,Shiotani M,Tseng A,Kuroda Y,etal.Evidence that portal vein decompression improves survival of canine quarter orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation, 1995;59:1388-1392.
    [74] Takada Y,Ueda M,Ishikawa Y,Fujimoto Y,Miyauchi H,Ogura Y,Ochiai T, Tanaka K.End-to- side portocaval shunting for a small- for-size graft in living donor liver transplantation.Liver Transpl.2004,10(6):807-810.
    [75] Boillot O, Delafosse B, Mechet I, Boucaud C, Pouyet M. Small-for- size partial liver graft in an adult recipient:a new transplant technique. Lancet, 2002;359:406-407.
    [76]汤黎明,王杰,钱建民等.奥曲肽抑制部分肝移植早期细胞凋亡的实验研究.中华器官移植杂志,2005;26:100-102
    [77] Sano K,Makuuehi M,Miki K,Maema A,Sugawara Y,Imamura H,Matsunami H,Takayama T.Evaluation of Hepatic Venous Congestion: ProPosed indication criteria for hepaticvein reconstruction.Ann of surg, 2002;236:241-247.
    [78] Lee S,Park K,Hwang S,Kim K,Ahn C,Moon D,Joo J,Cho S,Oh K,Ha T,Yang H,Choi K,Hwang K,Lee E,Lee Y,Lee H,Chung Y, Kim M,LeeS,Suh D,Sung K.Anterior segment congestion of a right liver lobe graf tin living-donor liver transplantation and strategy to prevent congestion.J Hepato Binary Panereatic Sung,2003,10(l):16-25.
    [79] Amadeo Mareos,Selection and Outeome of Living Donors for Adult to Adult Right Lobe TransPlantation.TransPlantation.2000;69:2410 -2415.
    [80] Kiuchi T,Kasahara M,Uryuhara K,Inomata Y,Uemoto S,Asonuma K,Egawa H, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Tanaka K. Impact of graft size mismatehing on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors.Transplantation,1999:67:321-327.
    [81] Man K,Lee TK,Liang TB,Lo CM,Fung PC,Tsui SH,Li XL,Ng KT,Fan ST.FK409 ameliorates small-for- size liver graft injury by attenuation of portal hypertension and down-regulation of Egr-l pathway.Ann Surg, 2004; 240:159-168.
    [82] Zhao Y,Man K,Lo CM,Ng KT,Li XL,Sun CK,Lee TK,Dai XW, Fan ST.Attenuation of small-for-size liver graft injury by FTY720: significance of cell- survival Akt signaling pathway.Am J TransPlant; 2004;4:1399-1407.
    [83] Palmes D,Budny TB,Stratmann U,et al.Endothelin-A receptor antagonist reduces microcirculatory disturbances and transplant dysfunction after partial liver trasplantation[J].Liver Transpl,2003,9(9):929-939.
    [84]Yang ZF, Tsui TY, Ho DW, Tang TC, Fan ST. Heme oxygenase-1 Potentiates the survival of small-for- size liver graft.Liver Transpl, 2004; 10:784-793.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700