用户名: 密码: 验证码:
NOTES技术在腹腔探查中应用的动物实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
背景:腹腔探查术是医生用来探查腹腔疾病病因或明确病变程度而普遍采用的一种检查和治疗方法。许多外科医生在临床工作中都会偶尔遇到不明原因的腹痛,无法确定的诊断及可疑的腹腔内肿块,目前临床开展的许多无创检查。例如腹部B超、CT、MR等对于微小病变诊断效果差,仅能发现直径5-10mm以上的腹腔内肿物。且辅助检查结果不能定性,仅起到提示作用,这样容易造成小病变的漏诊及误诊,例如对结核性腹膜炎、转移到腹膜的肿瘤等常不能提示。而这些病人往往无特异性临床表现,行常规内科检查无法及时准确诊断病因,尤其是找不到原因的腹水患者,这不仅容易延误病情也加重了病人经济负担。在这种情况下,腹腔探查作为一种非常有效,重要的手段常常可以帮助医生明确诊断。
     腹腔探查的方式很对,其中开腹探查、腹腔镜探查在技术上已经非常成熟,而应用NOTES技术行腹腔探查则是一种新兴的腹腔探查方式。其在腹腔探查及靶向取活检方面可显示出其独特的优势。本研究在总结前人经验基础上,在现有的技术及条件下利用实验猪模型对NOTES在腹腔探查及定向活检方面的可行性及价值做出评价。
     目的:腹腔探查及定向活检是诊断腹部疾病非常有效地一种手段,传统的方式对病人损伤大,费用高,病人难以接受。本研究只在评价NOTES在腹腔探查及取活检中的可行性及应用价值。
     方法:对3只雌性家猪依据不同入路分组并做好术前准备。术中给予深度麻醉,监护心电、血氧。术者分别从胃入路、肠入路、阴道入路建立切口,进入内镜,对拟定脏器行探查、取活检并留取图片。术后立即解剖,对各个脏器拍照。
     结果:实验动物经过禁食及药物处理胃肠道排空情况尚可。在拟定位置顺利完成造口,未发生造口出血。不同入路造口耗费时间及操作难度不同。直肠及阴道入路操作相对容易,造口耗费时间最短;胃入路操作难度大,耗时最长。术后剖腹观察未发现造口周围脏器损伤。气腹建立耗时约10分,完全满足探查视野需要。经胃入路对下腹部脏器如膀胱、卵巢、输卵管观察效果好。翻转镜身时可观察到部分肝脏、胃、胆囊、脾脏及膈肌。经肠及经阴道入路的观察范围几乎一致。对上腹部脏器如肝脏、胆囊、脾脏、胃、膈肌的观察效果理想,可以看见全部,但是探查肝脏的膈肌面操作难度较大。对于下腹部脏器的探查需要翻转镜身,探查仅见部分膀胱,卵巢、输卵管。三种入路对腹膜后脏器肾脏、输尿管、胰腺探查均未成功;对大小肠、大网膜、壁层腹膜探查效果无明显差别,均全部可见。对所见脏器均可顺利进行靶向活检,但同一脏器在不同入路下活检术难度不同。
     结论:NOTES在腹腔探查及靶向活检方面具有巨大优势和潜力,不同入路之间对拟定脏器探查范围存在差异,应根据拟探查脏器选择适宜的入路。
Background:The doctors always used abdominal exploration in examination andtreatment abdominal diseases.Many surgeons in the clinical work will occasionally meetunexplained abdominal pain and not sure the diagnosis and suspicious intra-abdominalmass.At present,a lot of the clinical noninvasive inspection,such as the abdominal ultrasoundexamination,CT and MR not good at diagnosis tiny lesions,they Can only found5-10mm indiameter of intra-abdominal mass and the auxiliary examination results can't qualitative,onlya hint role.It is easy to make small lesions misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis,tumors astuberculous peritonitis,the tumor which transfer to peritoneal tumors and these patients oftenmanifestation nonspecific clinical manifestation.Conventional medical examination can'tmake a timely and accurate diagnosis.Especially for ascites patients which can't find thereason.This is not only easy to delay disease diagnosis, but also aggravate the patienteconomic burden.In this situation,abdominal exploration is seen as a very effective andimportant way to help doctors make clear diagnosis.
     There are many ways of abdominal exploration,in those ways of exploratorylaparotomy,laparoscopic abdominal exploration in the technology has been very mature.Butusing NOTES in abdominal exploration is a new and developing way.Showing its uniqueadvantage in the abdominal cavity detection and targeted biopsy.The study in this articlebased on Predecessors' experience,in the existing technology and conditions utilization of thepig model to make evaluation of the feasibility and directional biopsy value use NOTES inabdominal exploration.
     Objective:Abdominal exploration and targeted biopsy is a very effectively method intargeted biopsy abdominal disease diagnosis,the traditional way of abdominal explorationhave too many defects,such as too much damage, high costs, so the patient unable tobear.This study purpose is evaluation the feasibility and biopsy application value withNOTES.
     Method:According to the different way random numbers of three experimental sows andprepare for the operation.Preoperative give depth anesthesia,monitoring ECG and bloodoxygen,Performer respectively from the stomach,vaginal and bowel into abdomen,carry out Exploration to protocol viscera,take the biopsy and pictures.Immediately anatomy afterabdominal exploration, take pictures of organs.
     Results: Experimental animals after fasting and drug treatment make thegastrointestinal tract emptying well.In protocol position successfully completed creates road,not occurred bleeding.Different road into the celiac in time-consuming and operationdifficulty appear difference.The way of rectum and vaginal relatively easy operation,time-consuming shortest;The way of stomach operation difficulty,time-consuminglongest.Postoperative laparotomy observation not found visceral injury around the road.Ittook about10minutes established pneumoperitoneum,can meet meet the need to explorationvision.The way of stomach make well exploration in lower abdominal viscera such asbladder, ovarian,oviduct.Overturn lens can observed part of the liver,gallbladder,spleen,stomach,and the diaphragmatic.The way of bowel and transvaginal observation almostunanimously range.Observation results are ideal in upper abdominal viscera as to the liver,gallbladder and spleen, stomach, the diaphragmatic,but detection of liver diaphragmatic faceoperation seem difficult.For lower abdominal viscera need to overturn lens, detection onlypart of the bladder, ovarian, fallopian tube.All of the road can not exploration retroperitonealorgans such as kidney, pancreas, ureteral.For large large intestine, small intestine, omental,the parietal peritoneum no obvious difference,all visible.All organs can perform targetedbiopsy successfully, but the same viscera in different approaches biopsy appera differentdifficulty.
     Conclusion:NOTES in the abdominal exploration and targeted biopsy have show itsbig advantages and potential,different way into abdomen can make different observationrange,we should select suitable way according to purpose viscera.
引文
[1] Wilk PJ.Method for use in intra-abdominal surgery.US Patent,1994,5:297-536.
    [2] Harrell AG,Heniford BT.Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: luxet veritas past,present, and future.Am J Surg,2005,190(2):239-243.
    [3] Kalloo NA,Singh VK,Jagannath SB,et al.Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy:a novelapproach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2004,60(1):114-117.
    [4] Rattner D,Kalloo A,ASGE/SAGES Working Group.ASGE/SAGES working group onnatural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.October2005[J].Surg Endosc,2006,20(2):329-333.
    [5] Jagannath SB,Kantsevoy SV, et al.Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopiantubes with long-term survival in a porcine model.Gastrointest Endosc,2005,61(3):449-453.
    [6] Wagh MS,Merrifield BF,et a1.Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organresection:initial experience in a porcine model.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2005,3(9):892-896.
    [7] Grady D,Doctors try new surgery for gallbladder removal.New York Times.2007-04-20,cited2007-07-06health.
    [8] Marescaux J,Dallemagne B,et al.Surgery without Scars:Report of TransluminalCholecystectomy in a Human Being.Arch Surg,2007,142(9):826-827.
    [9] Decarli L, Zorro′n R, Branco A, et al. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery(N.O.T.E.S)transvaginal cholecystectomy in a morbidly obese patient[J]. Obes Surg,2008,18(7):886-889.
    [10] Mintz Y, Horgan S, et al. Hybridnatural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) sleevegastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model[J]. Surg Endosc,2008,22(8):1798-1802.
    [11] Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, et al. Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in human: aunique approach to NOTES-world′s first report[J]. Surg Endosc,2008,22(5):1343-1347.
    [12] Li W, Xiao JG. Investigation for Acceptance of Natural Orifice TranslumenalEndoscopic Surgery By Inpatients with Digestive Diseases.Gastrointest Endosc,2008,67: AB120.
    [13] Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, et al. Patient perception of natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy [J].Gastrointest Endosc,2008,67(6):854-860.
    [14] Pearl JP, Ponsky JL. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery:a criticalreview[J]. Gastrointest Surg,2008,12(7):1293-1300.
    [15] ASGE Technology Comm, Kantsevoy SV, Adler DG, et al. Natural orifice translumenalendoscopic surgery[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2008,68(4):617-620.
    [16] Michael F. McGee,et a1.Systemic inflammation and physiologic burden of transgasticnatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)peritoneoscopy: a controlled,prospective comparison between NOTES and1aparoscopy [J].Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65(5):289.
    [17] McGee MF,Schomisch SJ,et a1.Late phase TNF-alpha depression in natural orificetranslumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy[J]. Surgery,2008,143(3):318-328.
    [18] Bingener J, Krishnegowda NK, Buck L, et al. Randomized Study Reveals SignificantDifference in TNFα Between NOTES and Laparoscopy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2008,67(5):AB112.
    [19] Pham BV,Morgan K,Bazaz S,et al. A pilot comparison of adhesion for mationfollowing colonic perforation and repair in a porcine model:transgastric (NOTES)laparoscopic,or open surgical technique[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65:109.
    [20] Dubcenco E,Assumpcao L,Dray X,et al.Adhesion formation after peritoneoscopywith liver biopsy in a survival porcine model: comparison of laparotomy,laparoscopy,and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)[J].Endoscopy,2009,41(11):971-978.
    [21] Bingener J,Michalek J,W inston J, et al. Randomized blinded trial comparing thecardiopulmonary effects of NOTES with standard laparoscopy in a porcinesurvivalmodel[J]. Surg Endosc,2008,22(6):1430-1434.
    [22] Bingener J,Michalek J,Van SickleK, eta.l Randomized blinded trial shows relativethrombocytopenia in naturalorifice translumenal endoscopic surgery compared withstandard laparoscopy in a porcine survivalmodel[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(9):2067-2071.
    [23] Arezzo A,Kratt T,Schurr MO,et a1.Laparoscopic-assisted transgastric cholecyste-ctomyand secure endoscopic closure of the transgastric defect in a survival porcinemodel.Endoscopy,2009,41(9):767-772.
    [24] von Renteln D,Vassiliou MC,Rothstein RI.Randomized controlled trial comparingendoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery gastrotomies.Endoscopy,2009,41(12):1056-1061.
    [25] Bhat YM,Hegde S,Knaus M,et a1.Transluminal endosurgery:novel use ofendoscopic tacks for the closure of access Sites in natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery(with Videos).Gastrointest Endosc,2009,69:1161-1166.
    [26] Trunzo JA,Cavazzola LT,Elmunzer BJ,et a1.Facilitating gastrotomy closure duringnatural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery using tissue anchors.Endoscopy,2009,41:487-492.
    [27] Hucl T,Benes M,Kocik M,et a1.A novel double-endoloop technique for natural orificetransluminal endoscopic surgery gastric access Site closure.Gastrointest Endosc,2010,71:806-811.
    [28] Park PO,Bergstrom M,Rothstein R,et a1.Endoscopic sutured closure of a gastric naturalorifice transluminal endoscopic surgery access gastrotomy compared with open surgicalclosure in a porcine model.A randomized,multicenter controlled trial.Endoscopy,2010,42:311-317.
    [29] Phee SJ,Ho KY,Lomanto D,et a1.Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepaticresection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slavetransluminal endoscopic robot(MASTER).Surg Endosc,2010,24(9):2293-2298.
    [30] Bardaro SJ,Swanstrom L.Development of advanced endoscopes for Natural OrificeTransluminal Endoscopic Surgery(NOTES)[J].Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2006,15(6):378.
    [31] Lehman AC,Rentschler ME,Farritor SM,et a.l.Endoluminal minirobots for transgastricperitoneoscopy. Minim lnvasive Ther Allied Technol,2006,15:384-388.
    [32] Fuente SG,DeMaria EJ,Reynolds JD,et al.New developments in surgery: natural orificetransluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).Arch Surg,2007,142(3):295-297.
    [33] Raman JD,Bergs RA,Fernandez R,et a1.Complete transvaginal NOTES nephrectomyusing magnetically anchored instrumentation[J].Endourol,2009,23:367-371.
    [34] Ryou M,Thompson CC.Magnetic retraction in natural-orifice transluminal endoscopicsurgery(NOTES):addressing the problem of traction and countertraction.Endoscopy,2009,41:143-148.
    [35]牛军,刘恩宇,牛卫博,等.NOTES新术式:经气管内镜甲状腺切除术动物实验研究[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2009,12(10):829-832.
    [36]朱惠明,师瑞月,王娜,等.经胃腹腔内镜检查对原因不明腹水的诊断价值[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2010,27(1):5-8.
    [37]王东,郑永志,吴仁培,等.经自然腔道内镜手术的实验研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2009,26(1):6-10.
    [38] Delius SV,Wilhelm D,Feussner H,et a1.Natural orifice transluminal endoscopicsurgery:cardiopulmonary safety of transesophageal mediastinoscopy. Endoscopy,2010,42(5):405-412.
    [39] Liu YH,Liu HP,Wu YC,et a1.Feasibility of transtracheal surgical lung biopsy in acanine animal model.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2010,37(5):1235-1236.
    [40] Liu YH,Liu HP,Wu YC,et a1.Feasibility of transtracheal thoracoscopy(natural orificetransluminal endoscopic surgery)[J].Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2010,139(5):1349-1350.
    [41] Metzelder ML,Vieten G,Gosemann J,et a1.Rigid NOTES:the transurethral approach infemale piglets[J].Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2009,19:581-587.
    [42] Fritscher-Ravens A et a1.Randomized comparative long-term survival study ofendoscopic and thoracoscopic esophageal wall repair after NOTES mediastinoscopy inhealthy and compromised animals.Endoscopy,2010,42:468-474.
    [43]黄学飞,孙刚,肖建国,等.经胃、结肠与经胃、阴道双路径猪输卵管切除术和肝脏活检术的比较研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2009,26(6):307-309.
    [44] Elmunzer BJ,Schomisch SJ,et al.EUS in localizing safe alternate access sites for naturalorifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: initial experience in a porcine model.Gastrointest Endosc,2009,69(1):108-114.
    [45] Fritscher-Ravens A,Mosse CA.Transluminal endosurg er y:single lumen accessanastomotic device for flexible endoscopy [J].Gastrointest Endosc,2003,58(4):585-591.
    [46] Fritscher-Ravens A.Transgastric endoscopy: a new fashion, a new excitement[J].Endoscopy,2007,39(2):161-167.
    [47] Kaehler G,Grobholz R,Lang ner C,et al.A new technique of endoscopic ful-thicknessresection using a flexible stapler[J].Endoscopy,2006,38(1):86-89.
    [48] Raju GS, Shibukaw a G, Ahmed I, et al. Endoluminal suturing may over come thelimitations of clip closure of a gaping wide colon perforation [J].Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65(6):906-911.
    [49] Chang KJ,Nguyen NT.Novel T-Bar tissue fastener combined with prototype forwardviewing therapeutic echoendoseope:preparing for “NOTES”[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65(5):AB280.
    [50] Chiu PW,Jau JY,Lam CC,et al.Closure of gastrotomy after transgastric tubal ligationusing the eagle claw VII:a survival experiment in a porcine mode1[J].GastrointestEndosc,2008,68(3):554-559.
    [51] Desilets DJ,Romanelli J,Surti VC,et al.The ties that bind:durable,transmural,purse-string-like gastrotomy closure using a novel device.Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65:AB292.
    [52] Ryou M,Hazan R,Rahme L,et a1.The effectiveness of current sterility techniques innatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65(5): AB290.
    [53] Romagnuolo J,Morgan K,Morris J,et al.Differences in peritoneal bacterialcontamination of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES) vslaparoscopy in a colon perforation and repair model[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2008,67(5): AB112.
    [54] McGee SM,Routh JC,PereiraCW,et al.Minimal contamination of the human peritoneumafter transvesical incision[J].J Endourol,2009,23(4):659-663.
    [55] Lomanto D,ChuaHC,MyatMM,et al.Microbiological contamination during transgastricand transvaginal endoscopic techniques [J].Laparoendosc Adv SurgTech A,2009,19(4):465-469.
    [56]胡三元,杨庆芸,张光永,等.经胃及阴道内镜胆囊切除动物实验研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2008,13(6):479-483.
    [57] Buck L,Michalek J,Van SickleK,et al.Can gastric irrigation prevent infection duringNOTES mesh placement?[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2008,12(11):2010-2014.
    [58] Ramamoorthy SL,Lee JK,MintzY, et al.The impact of proton-pump inhibitors onintraperitoneal sepsis:a word of caution for transgastric NOTES procedures[J].SurgEndosc,2010,24(1):16-20.
    [59] Zorron R,Palanivelu C,Galvào NetoMP,et al.International multicenter trial on clinicalnatural orifice surgery--NOTES IMTN study:preliminary results of362patients[J].SurgInnov,2010,17(2):142-158.
    [60] Lehmann KS,Ritz JP,et al.The German registry for natural orifice translumenalendoscopic surgery: report of the first551patients[J].Ann Surg,2010,252(2):263-270.
    [61] Shsfi B M et al.Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery(NOTES). Seminars inPediatric Surgery,2006,15,25l-258.
    [62] Witzel K,Rahden BHA,Kaminski C,et a1.Transoral access for endoscopic thyroidresection [J].Surg Endosc,2008,22:1871-1875.
    [63] Benhidjeb T,Wilhelm T,et a1.Natural orifice surgery on thyroid gland: totally transoralvideo-assisted thyroidectomy (TOVAT): report of first experimental results of a newsurgical method[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(5):1119-1120.
    [64] Flora ED,Wilson TG,Ma rtin IJ,et al.A review of natural orifice translumenalendoscopic surgery(NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery:experimental models,techniques,and applicability to the clinic setting [J].Ann Surg,2008,247(4):583-602.
    [65]李闻.经自然孔道内镜外科学[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(42):3022-3024.
    [66] Hagen M,Christen D,Morel P.Cosmetic Issues of NOTES:A rationale for furtherresearch and investments.Gastrointest En-dosc,2007,65:AB109.
    [67]孙刚.经自然管壁内镜手术实验动物研究[D].北京.中国人民解放军军医进修学院.2009.19-29.
    [68] Fong DG, Pai RD, Thompson CC.Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: aNOTES survival study in a porcine model[J].Gastrointest Endosc.2007Feb;65(2):312-8.
    [69] Onders R, McGee MF, Marks J,et al.Diaphragm pacing with natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery: potential for difficult-to-wean intensive care unit patients.SurgEndosc.2007,21(3):475-479.
    [70] Gauderer MW,Ponsky JL,Izant RJ Jr.Gastrostomy without laparotomy:a percutaneousendoscopic technique.J Pediatr Surg,1980,15:872-875.
    [71] Kantsevoy SV,Jagannath SB,Niiyama H.A novel safe approach to the peritoneal cavityfor per-oral transgastric endoscopic procedures.Gastrointest Endosc,2007,65:497-500.
    [72] Juliane B,Joel M,John W.Randomized blinded trail comparing the cardiopulmonaryeffects of NOTES with standard laparoscopy in a porcine survival model.SrugEndosc,2008,22:1430-1434.
    [73] Nau P;Anderson J;Needleman B.Endoscopic peritoneal access and insufflation:naturalorifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.Gastmintest Endosc,2010,71:485-489.
    [74] Swanstrom LL, Kozarek R, Pasricha PJ,et al.Development of a new access device fortransgastric surgery.J Gastrointest Surg,2005,9(8):1129-36.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700