用户名: 密码: 验证码:
电力行业碳排放交易理论体系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
人类活动导致全球气候变化已是一个不争的事实,气候变化引起的极端灾害天气在全世界正引起前所未有的重视和关切。应对气候变化的核心是减少温室气体排放,其中主要是能源消费的C02排放。随着城市化、工业化、市场化的高速发展,“十五”期间我国能源消费状况偏离了2020年能源战略目标,经济快速增长的同时,CO2排放也高速增加。早在2008年,中国已经成为世界温室气体排放量最大的国家之一。随着煤电装机的持续增长,2030年以后我国的碳排放量要远大于在国际上可能争取到的排放空间,降低我国电力行业的碳排放不仅可以降低我国对化石燃料的依赖度,同时还可为应对气候变化和能源安全做出贡献。随着《京都议定书》的实施,通过全球合作实现减排的国际碳排放交易市场迅速发展,成为推动低碳经济发展最为重要的机制。根据欧盟各国的实践经验,碳排放交易在促进减排目标实现过程中发挥了重要的作用。本文将碳排放交易体系建发与我国电力工业的可持续发展相结合,运用可持续发展理论观点,对电力行业碳排放交易的理论体系进行深入研究,以期为我国电力工业的低碳化发展提供决策支持。本文的主要研究内容如下:
     首先,阐述了碳排放交易的来源及其两种表现形式——CDM和配额交易机制的相关概念,总结了目前两种交易机制的应用情况。对CDM和配额交易机制的交易原理进行了比较研究,并分析了两种交易机制在不完全竞争市场和完全竞争市场的投资激励效果。
     其次,讨论了与碳排放交易密切相关的碳排放权分配机制问题,主要包括碳排放权的分配方案和分配方式。一方面研究建立了基于发电量的碳排放权分配模型和基于燃料类型的碳排放权分配模型,并对两种分配模型进行了比较,最终给出其适用范畴。另一方面,将拍卖分配方式引入碳排放权交易市场中,提出了标准增价拍卖方式的定量化模型,并模拟仿真了不同排放率下企业采取真实报价和策略竞标两种方案,以分析不同策略组合下的企业利润,从而为我国碳排放文权分配方式的设计提供参考。
     第三,研究了三种碳排放交易方案的建模求解,分别是基于发电资源的碳排放交易修正方案、基于用电负荷的碳排放交易修正方案以及基于第一出售者的碳排放交易方案。根据各种不同交易方案,分别建立区域内与区域外两类用电服务机构与发电商的利润最大化模型,并对该方案下的用电服务机构与发电商的在运营中的经济与环境问题进行均衡分析,从理论上对三种碳排放交易模型的特性进行揭示与分析。
     第四,研究了碳排放对电力系统经济的影响,提出了若干衡量碳排放的经济性指标,以探讨特定电力系统在碳排放约束的情况下,电力需求变化与系统成本效益的关系,并以煤电机组、联合循环燃气机组(CCg)和循环燃气涡轮机组(CTg)及负荷组成的三母线网络为实例,分有无输电约束限制两类情形对系统的碳排放成本效益进行分析。
     最后,总结了我国碳排放交易市场(CDM市场和配额交易市场)面临的主要问题。在此基础上,提出构建碳排放交易市场体系建设的设想,分别从碳排放权分配机制、定价机制和交易平台建设三个方面进行了论述,最后给出完善我国碳排放交易市场的政策建议。
The global climate change caused by human activities has been an indisputable fact, which is also causing unprecedented worldwide attention and concern. The core of reacting climate change is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, especially the CO2of energy consumption. With the rapid development of urbanization, industrialization, market-oriented, the situation of energy consumption deviated from the China Energy Consumption Energy Strategy2020target in "the tenth five period", meanwhile the economic surge growth is relyed on high input resources, high pollution and low efficiency and high CO2emissions. China has become one of the largest contries of greenhouse gas emissions in the world in2008, and meets unprecedented challenges. With the continued growth of coal-fired power generation, China's carbon emissions may be much greater than the emission space fight in the international after2030, therefore reducing carbon emissions of China's power industry can not only reduce dependence on fossil fuels, but also help relieve climate change and energy security. With the implementation of "Kyoto Protocol", international carbon emissions trading market aimed at achieving reduction through global cooperation has developed rapidly, and is increasingly becoming the most important mechanism to promote development of low carbon economic. According to the practical experience of EU, carbon emissions trading played a significant role on achieving emission reduction targets successfully. In this paper, the construction of carbon emissions trading system and sustainable development of China's power industry has been systematically discussed. Moreover, the theoretical system of carbon emissions trading in power industry is analyzed in depth, which can provide decision support for low-carbon development of power industry.
     Here in this paper, the source of carbon emissions trading and its two forms:CDM and quota trading mechanism are firstly described, also the current application of two trading mechanisms are summarized. Trading principles of CDM and quota trading mechanism are compared. And effects of investment incentives of two kinds of trading mechanism are presented in oligopoly market and competitive market.
     The allocation mechanism of cabon emissions rights is discussed, which includes the allocation program and the allocation method, whose suitable scope are presented ultimately. On the other hand, the auction allocation method is introduced in carbon emissions trading market, through which two simulation examples of strict bidding and strategy bidding under different emission rates are proposed. Corporate profits in different strategies are analyzed, which can provide reference for the allocation design of cabon emissions trading.
     Three carbon emissions trading scheme are established, which are resource-based amendment scheme, load-based amendment scheme and first seller-based scheme. According to various trading sheme, maximize profits models are established within or outside the region between two types of service providers and generators. Finally, the characteristics of three carbon emissions trading scheme are revealed theoretically.
     Economy of carbon emissions in power industry is analyzed; what's more, several economic indicators are established for the relationship of power demand and cost-effectiveness of system. The example of three bus network composed of coal units, combined cycle gas-fired units (CCg), the cycle turbines gas units (CTg) and load is proposed. In that network, cost-benefit analysis of system carbon emissions is analyzed in both cases of the availability of transmission constraints.
     Finally, the major problems of China's carbon emissions trading market (CDM market and quota trading market) are summarized. Then, envisage of constructing carbon emissions trading system is presented, which involves the allocation scheme, pricing scheme and trading platform. Finally, some policy recommendations for improving China's carbon emissions trading market are proposed.
引文
[1]Donald MacKenzie. Making things the same:Gases emission rights and the politics of carbon markets[J]. Accounting Organizations and Society,2009,34(4):440-455
    [2]Christoph Bohringer, Heinz Welsch. Contraction and Convergence of carbon emissions: an intertemporal multi-region CGE analysis[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling,2004, 26(1):21-39
    [3]Stephen J. DeCanio. The political economy of global carbon emissions reductions [J]. Ecological Economics,2009,68(3):915-92.
    [4]Marian Leimbach. Equity and carbon emissions trading:a model analysis[J]. Energy Policy,2003,31(10):1033-1044
    [5]Janet Peace, Timothy Juliani. The coming carbon market and its impact on the American economy[J]. Policy and Society,2009,27(4):305-316
    [6]Andrew G. Keeler. State Commission Electricity Regulation under Federal Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Policy[J]. The Electricity Journal,2008,21(5):19-30
    [7]Dallas Burtraw, Danny Kahn, Karen Palmer. CO2 Allowance Allocation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and the Effect on Electricity Investors[J]. The Electricity Journal,2006,14(3):79-90
    [8]Carmona R., Fehr M., Hinz J., et al. Market Design for Emission Trading Schemes[J]. SIAM Review,2010,52(3):403-452
    [9]Michael Gillenwater, Clare Breidenich. Internalizing carbon costs in electricity markets:Using certificates in a load-based emissions trading scheme[J]. Energy Policy, 2008,37(10):290-299
    [10]Michael Grubb, Karsten Neuhoff. Allocation and Competitiveness in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. Policy Overview,2006,6(6):7-30
    [11]J. Sijm, K. Neuhoff, Y.Chen. CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector[J]. Climate Policy,2006,6(5):49-72
    [12]Karsten Neuhoff, Kim Keats Martinez, Misato Sato. Allocation, Incentives and Distortions:The Impact of EU ETS Emissions Allowance Allocations to the Electricity Sector[R]. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics,2006,6(5):73-91
    [13]Keppler J.H., Cruciani M. Rents in the European power sector due to carbon trading[J]. Energy Policy,2010,38(8):4280-4290
    [14]F. Matthes, V. Graichen, J. Repenning. The environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme:Structural aspects of allocation[J]. Environmental Economics and Policy,2007,1(1):66-87
    [15]M. Grubb, K. Neuhoff. Allocation and Competitiveness in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme:Policy overview[J]. Climate Policy,2006,6(1):7-30
    [16]J. Sijm. EU ETS allocation:Evaluation of present system and options beyond 2012[J]. Zeitschrift fur Energiewirtschaft,2006,30(4):285-292
    [17]Carmona Rene, Fehr Max, Hinz, Juri, et al. Market design for emission trading schemes[J]. SIAM Revie,2010,52(3):403-452
    [18]Christoph Bohringer, Tim Hoffmann, Casiano Manrique-de-Lara-Penate. The efficiency costs of separating carbon markets under the EU emissions trading scheme:A quantitative assessment for Germany[J]. Energy Economics,2006,28(1):44-61
    [19]Anita Engels. The European Emissions Trading Scheme:An exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2009,34(3-4):488-498
    [20]饶蕾,曾骋.欧盟碳排放权交易制度对企业的经济影响分析[J].环境保护,2008,392(3):77-79
    [21]E.J.L. Chappin, G.P.J. Dijkema. On the impact of CO2 emission-trading on power generation emissions[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2009,76(3): 358-370
    [22]Hung Shao-Pin, Hung Yuh-Ming, Kuo Ting-We, et al. Taipower's Strategies in Response to Domestic and International Carbon Market Developments[J]. Monthly Journal of Taipower's Engineering,2010, (747):125-130
    [23]Niels Anger. Emissions trading beyond Europe:Linking schemes in a post-Kyoto world[J]. Energy Economics,2008,30(4):2028-2049
    [24]Hard Laurikka. Option value of gasification technology within an emissions trading scheme[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(18):3916-3928
    [25]Rolf de Vos. Emissions trading:Its effect on the green energy market[J]. Refocus,2004, 5(5):58-59
    [26]Monica Bonacina, Francesco Gulli. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading":A dominant firm with competitive fringe model[J]. Energy Policy,2007, 35(8):4200-4220
    [27]Allan Cook. Emission rights:From costless activity to market operations[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society,2009,34(3-4):456-468
    [28]Paul Simshauser. On Emission Permit Auction vs. Allocation and the Structural Adjustment of Incumbent Power Generators in Australia[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2008,21(10).-30-41
    [29]Emilie Alberola, Julien Chevallier, Benoit Cheze. Emissions compliances and carbon prices under the EU Trading Scheme[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling,2009,31(3): 446-462
    [30]Bettina B.F. Wittneben. Exxon is right:Let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax[J]. Energy Policy,2009,37(6):2462-2464
    [31]Ulrich Oberndorfer. EU Emission Allowances and the stock market:Evidence from the electricity industry[J]. Ecological Economics,2009,68(4):1116-1126
    [32]Michael Gillenwater, Clare Breidenich. Internalizing carbon costs in electricity markets:Using certificates in a load-based emissions trading scheme[J]. Energy Policy, 2009,37(1):290-299
    [33]Luis M. Abadie, Jose M. Chamorro. European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments[J]. Energy Economics,2008,30(6):2992-3015
    [34]Ruiz, Pablo, Aleksandr Rudkevich. Marginal Nodal Carbon Intensity in Power Networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2009, (5):1-8
    [35]Ivana Kockar. Unit Commitment for Combined Pool/Bilateral Markets with Emissions Trading[J]. The Electricity Journal,2008,7(7):1-9
    [36]Dallas Burtraw, Karen Palmer, Ranjit Bharvirkar, et al. The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances[J]. The Electricity Journal, 2002,15(6):51-62
    [37]Steven Michel, John Nielsen. Popping the CO2RC:An Alternative Load-Based CO2 Cap-and-Trade Instrument for the Electricity Sector[J]. The Electricity Journal,2008, 21(5):31-42
    [38]Tobey Winters. Electric Supply Options in a World Driven by CO2 Emission Policies[J]. The Electricity Journal,2007,19(2):73-81
    [39]Damien Crilly, Toshko Zhelev. Emissions targeting and planning:an application of CO2 emissions pinch analysis (CEPA) to the Irish electricity generation sector[J]. Energy Policy,2008,33(10):1498-1507
    [40]Chi-Keung Woo, Debra Lloyd, Asher Tishler. Electricity market reform failures:UK, Norway, Alberta and California[J]. Energy Policy,2003,31(11):1103-1115
    [41]Richard B. Howarth. Emissions Trading:Principles and Practice [J]. Ecological Economics,2007,61(2-3):576-577
    [42]K. Neuhoff, M. Grubb, K. Keats. Impact of allowance allocation on prices and efficiency[R]. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics,2005,11(10):1-25
    [43]M. Bartels, F. Musgens. Do technology specific CO2-allocations distort investments [J]. Energy Economics,2006,28(8):1-14
    [44]Y. Smeers, A. Ehrenmann. Free allowances and investments in a CO2 constrained restructured market[C]. INFORMS National Meeting,2006,11(11):1-18
    [45]Laura N. Haar, Lawrence Haar. Policy-making under uncertainty:Commentary upon the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(17): 2615-2629
    [46]Thi Bich Thao Pham, Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon, Chatchawan Vongmahadlek. Development of an inventory and temporal allocation profiles of emissions from power plants and industrial facilities in Thailand[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2008,397(1-3):103-118
    [47]Scott Jiusto. The differences that methods make:Cross-border power flows and accounting for carbon emissions from electricity use[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(17): 2915-2928
    [48]Andrew Ford. Simulation scenarios for rapid reduction in carbon dioxide emissions in the western electricity system [J]. Energy Policy,2008,36(1):443-455
    [49]孙高洋.中国针对CDM机制的策略选择研究[J].节能减排,2008,39(2):4-8
    [50]赵捧莲,杨来科,闫云凤.中国碳排放的影响因素及测算:模型比较及文献述评[J].经济问题探索,2012,(2):131-136
    [51]于超,谭忠富.基于排放绩效的燃煤电厂碳税优化模型[J].华东电力,2011,39(6):845-849
    [52]许士春,习蓉,何正霞.中国能源消耗碳排放的影响因素分析及政策启示[J].资源科学,2012,34(1):2-2
    [53]D.Y.C. Leung, Daniel Yung, Amanda Ng, M.K.H. Leung, Alan Chan. An overview of emissions trading and its prospects in Hong Kong[J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2008,12(1):92-101
    [54]Jun Li, Michel Colombier. Managing carbon emissions in China through building energy efficiency[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90(8):2436-2447
    [55]Chi Zhang, P.R. Shukla, David G. Victor, et al. Baselines for carbon emissions in the Indian and Chinese power sectors:Implications for international carbon trading[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(14):1900-1917
    [56]Edgard Gnansounou, Jun Dong, Denis Bedniaguine. The strategic technology options for mitigating CO2 emissions in power sector:assessment of Shanghai electricity-generating system[J]. Ecological Economics,2004,50(1-2):117-133
    [57]Karen Palmer, Dallas Burtraw, Jhih-Shyang Shih. The benefits and costs of reducing emissions from the electricity sector[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2007, 83(1):115-130
    [58]Richard S. J. Tol. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions:an assessment of the uncertainties[J]. Energy Policy,2005,33(16):2064-2074
    [59]J.R. Barton, I. Issaias, E.I. Stentiford. Carbon-Making the right choice for waste management in developing countries[J]. Waste Management,2008,28(4):690-698.
    [60]Ben Pearson. Market failure:why the Clean Development Mechanism won't promote clean development[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2007,15(2):247-252
    [61]Ger Klaassen, Andries Nentjes, Mark Smith. Testing the theory of emissions trading: Experimental evidence on alternative mechanisms for global carbon trading[J]. Ecological Economics,2005,53(1):47-58
    [62]曾晓文,章激扬.电网企业开展CDM项目的方法学及开发策略[J].节能,2011,(11):20-23
    [63]赵硕,姜学民,任龙.中国发展CDM的问题和对策研究[J].战略决策研究,2011,2(2):34-38
    [64]刘兴萍.CDM投融资模式在我国的发展现状、问题及对策[J].现代商业,2011,(9):139-140
    [65]R. Bettle, C.H. Pout, E.R. Hitchin. Interactions between electricity-saving measures and carbon emissions from power generation in England and Wales[J]. Energy Policy, 2006,34(18):3434-3446
    [66]Esteve Corbera, Katrina Brown. Building Institutions to Trade Ecosystem Services: Marketing Forest Carbon in Mexico[J]. World Development,2008,36(10):1956-1979
    [67]Christoph Bohringer, Andreas Lange. On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances[J]. European Economic Review,2005,49(8):2041-2055
    [68]迟远英,牛东晓,沈滞,等.基于协整的影响我国碳排放因素的模型研究[J].华东电力,2010,38(5):647-650
    [69]Slusarczyk B. Impact of eu environmental policy on polish iron and steel industry[J]. Metalurgija,2011,50(1):49-52
    [70]于天飞.碳排放权交易的制度构想[J].林业经济,2007,7(5):49-51
    [71]钟锦文,张晓盈.美国碳排放交易体系的实践与启示[J].经济研究参考,2011,(28):77-80
    [72]袁溥,李宽强.碳排放交易制度下我国初始排放权分配方式研究[J].国际贸易探索,2011,27(3):78-82
    [73]肖序,张宗友.国际碳排放权交易市场研究[J].企业家天地,2007,12(11):90
    [74]于天飞,沈文星,黄喜.碳排放权交易的市场分析[J].林业经济,2008,8(5):62-64
    [75]于天飞.碳排放权交易的产权分析[J].东北农业大学学报,2007,5(2):101-103
    [76]康重庆,陈启鑫,夏清.低碳电力技术的研究展望[J].电网技术,2009,33(2):1-7
    [77]徐国泉,刘则源,姜照华.中国碳排放的因素分解模型及实证分析:1995-2004[J].中国人口资源与环境,2006,16(6):158-161
    [78]佟新华.中日一次能源消耗的碳排放及影响因素对比分析[J].现代日本经济,2008,162(6):46-51
    [79]蒲益婳.国际法视角:京都碳排放交易机制下我国的应对之策[J].法制与社会,2008,10(10):264-265
    [80]涂毅.国际温室气体(碳)排放权市场的发展及其启示[J].江西财经大学学报,2008,56(2):15-19
    [81]刘伟平,戴永务.碳排放权交易在中国的研究进展[J].林业经济问题,2004,24(4):193-197
    [82]李丽平,任勇,田春秀.国际贸易视角下的中国碳排放责任分析[J].环境保护,2008,392(3):62-64
    [83]魏一鸣.关于我国碳排放问题的若干对策与建议[J].中国科学院院刊,2006,21(1):6
    [84]刘晓,艾欣,彭谦.计及需求响应的含风电场电力系统发电与碳排放权联合优化调度[J].电网技术,2012,36(1):213-218
    [85]曾鸣,冯俊杰,朱晓丽,等.基于多Agent的电力系统二氧化碳排放量交易框架研究[J].华东电力,2011,39(11):1850-1852
    [86]廖玫,戴嘉.国际碳排放贸易的市场格局及其准入条件研究[J].财贸研究,2008,15(1):68-72
    [87]李炯,李睿渊.省域碳排放交易制度构建条件与路径[J].浙江树人大学学报,2011,11(3):45-49
    [88]谭丹,黄贤金.我国东、中、西部地区经济发展与碳排放的关联分析及比较[J].中国人口资源与环境,2008,28(3):53-57
    [89]王铮,朱永彬.我国各省区碳排放量状况及减排对策研究[J].战略与决策研究,2008,23(2):109-115
    [90]谭丹,黄贤金,胡初枝.我国工业行业的产业升级与碳排放关系分析[J].四川环境,2008,27(2):74-78
    [91]刘强,庄幸,姜克隽,等.中国出口贸易中的载能量及碳排放量分析[J].中国工业经济,2008,245(8):46-55
    [92]杨蕾,李光明,沈雁文,等.中国能源消费带来的碳排放问题与碳减排措施[J].资源与环境,2008,14(3):169-170
    [93]曾鸣,秦湘灵,马向春,等.计及碳排放约束的电力综合资源规划模型与模拟分析[J].华东电力,2010,38(8):1103-1106
    [94]李存斌,张晓毅.基于云模型的电厂排碳量预测模型[J].华东电力,2010,38(7):1019-1021
    [95]胡初枝,黄贤金,钟太洋,等.中国碳排放特征及其动态演进分析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2008,18(3):38-42
    [96]迟远英,王彦亮,牛东晓,等.碳排放交易下的发电权置换优化模型[J].电网技术,2010,34(6):78-81
    [97]黄珺仪.可再生能源绿色证书政策的理论研究[J].浙江工商职业技术学院学报,2010,(1):34-39
    [98]王健,路正南,陈春华.我国经济增长对碳排放的影响分析[J].经济实证,2012,(1):137-139
    [99]潘家华,郑艳.碳排放与发展权益[J].世界环境,2008,(4):58-63
    [100]Dhakal S., Raut A.K.. Potential and bottlenecks of the carbon market:The case of a developing country, Nepal[J]. Energy Policy,2010,38(7):3781-3789
    [101]刘晓,艾欣,杨俊.考虑未来碳排放交易的需求侧备用竞价与调度模式设计[J].电力系统自动化,2011,35(2):38-42
    [102]陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报,2005,45(6):850-85
    [103]2050中国能源和碳排放研究课题组.2050中国能源和碳排放报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:1-216
    [104]R. W. Cottle, J.-S. Pang, R. E. Stone. The Linear Complementarity Problem[M]. Boston:Academic Press,1992:1-132

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700