基于数值模拟的结构动力模型试验相似理论研究
|
摘要
结构模型试验虽然是一门古老的技术,但在当前结构工程领域还占有重要地位,尤其是振动台模型试验技术在检验结构抗震设计性能,探索复杂特殊结构本质特性方面起着重要作用。
本文首先介绍了相似原理的基本理论及其发展现状和振动台模型试验的主要内容。对近年来国内外已经进行的振动台试验项目进行了系统的梳理总结,归纳出目前在振动台试验领域尚存在的一些问题,并对振动台模型试验领域未来需要继续深入研究的问题进行了初步探讨。
通过对振动台试验中几种常用相似规律的回顾,本文针对附加任意人工质量的模型相似律问题进行深入研究,给出了以一致相似律表达的用于附加任意人工质量相似模型设计的相似律。
以开源有限元系统OpenSees作为分析工具,本文针对一钢筋混凝土框架结构的振动台模型试验进行了系统的数值模拟研究,给出了原型结构,理想完全人工质量模型,附加40%人工质量欠质量模型及实际试验模型结构的弹性与弹塑性时程分析结果及结构的塑性发展历程,并根据弹塑性时程分析的结果探讨了结构在遭遇罕遇地震作用时的响应。
本文根据试验实测结果与结构弹塑性时程分析结果进行了对比分析研究,试验模型实测结果与数值模拟结果吻合较好,验证了本文所采用的有限元分析模型及分析技术的正确性;根据附加40%人工质量欠质量模型的反推值与原型弹塑性有限元分析结果的比较,检验了本文所提出的用于附加任意人工质量相似模型设计的相似律的正确性与可靠性;最后通过理论分析及完全人工质量与实际试验模型弹塑性时程分析结果的对比,初步探讨了振动台试验与计算机数值模拟相互融合技术方面的问题。
As an ancient technology, structural model tests still plays an important role in the filed of structural engineering currently, especially for shaking table tests.
This thesis addresses the dynamic similitude theory and numerical simulation of shaking table test. In particular, it focuses firstly on the similitude law of model tests supplemented with arbitrary artificial mass. Then it focuses on the nonlinear numerical simulation of shaking table test.
Shaking table tests which had been carried out recent years were summarized. Some problems existing in shaking table tests were presented at the following contents and some problems were discussed. Further studies were placed on the similarity law about arbitrary artificial mass which then proposed a general similarity law suitable for small scale models with arbitrary artificial mass.
Numerical simulations of a four story RC frame shaking table test model were systematically carried out. And the OpenSees (Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation) finite element system was adopted to do the analysis of the finite element models including prototype structure, adequate model, scaled down structure supplemented with 40% artificial mass and test model. During the finite element analysis, elastic and elasto-plastic time-history analysis were both taken.
According to the results of elasto-plastic time-history analysis of models that encountering earthquake of seldom intensity IX, structural response were compared and evolution of structural plasticity were obtained. Reliability and correctness of the finite element analysis model adopted in this thesis were verified through comparison between test results and nonlinear numerical simulation results of test model.
According to the comparison between numerical simulation results of prototype structure and scaled down structure supplemented with 40% artificial mass, the general similarity law proposed in this thesis were feasible and correct.
Finally, theoretical studying and comparison between analytical results of test model and of scaled down structure were taken. Preliminary studies were placed on the integration between shaking table test and numerical simulation.
本文首先介绍了相似原理的基本理论及其发展现状和振动台模型试验的主要内容。对近年来国内外已经进行的振动台试验项目进行了系统的梳理总结,归纳出目前在振动台试验领域尚存在的一些问题,并对振动台模型试验领域未来需要继续深入研究的问题进行了初步探讨。
通过对振动台试验中几种常用相似规律的回顾,本文针对附加任意人工质量的模型相似律问题进行深入研究,给出了以一致相似律表达的用于附加任意人工质量相似模型设计的相似律。
以开源有限元系统OpenSees作为分析工具,本文针对一钢筋混凝土框架结构的振动台模型试验进行了系统的数值模拟研究,给出了原型结构,理想完全人工质量模型,附加40%人工质量欠质量模型及实际试验模型结构的弹性与弹塑性时程分析结果及结构的塑性发展历程,并根据弹塑性时程分析的结果探讨了结构在遭遇罕遇地震作用时的响应。
本文根据试验实测结果与结构弹塑性时程分析结果进行了对比分析研究,试验模型实测结果与数值模拟结果吻合较好,验证了本文所采用的有限元分析模型及分析技术的正确性;根据附加40%人工质量欠质量模型的反推值与原型弹塑性有限元分析结果的比较,检验了本文所提出的用于附加任意人工质量相似模型设计的相似律的正确性与可靠性;最后通过理论分析及完全人工质量与实际试验模型弹塑性时程分析结果的对比,初步探讨了振动台试验与计算机数值模拟相互融合技术方面的问题。
As an ancient technology, structural model tests still plays an important role in the filed of structural engineering currently, especially for shaking table tests.
This thesis addresses the dynamic similitude theory and numerical simulation of shaking table test. In particular, it focuses firstly on the similitude law of model tests supplemented with arbitrary artificial mass. Then it focuses on the nonlinear numerical simulation of shaking table test.
Shaking table tests which had been carried out recent years were summarized. Some problems existing in shaking table tests were presented at the following contents and some problems were discussed. Further studies were placed on the similarity law about arbitrary artificial mass which then proposed a general similarity law suitable for small scale models with arbitrary artificial mass.
Numerical simulations of a four story RC frame shaking table test model were systematically carried out. And the OpenSees (Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation) finite element system was adopted to do the analysis of the finite element models including prototype structure, adequate model, scaled down structure supplemented with 40% artificial mass and test model. During the finite element analysis, elastic and elasto-plastic time-history analysis were both taken.
According to the results of elasto-plastic time-history analysis of models that encountering earthquake of seldom intensity IX, structural response were compared and evolution of structural plasticity were obtained. Reliability and correctness of the finite element analysis model adopted in this thesis were verified through comparison between test results and nonlinear numerical simulation results of test model.
According to the comparison between numerical simulation results of prototype structure and scaled down structure supplemented with 40% artificial mass, the general similarity law proposed in this thesis were feasible and correct.
Finally, theoretical studying and comparison between analytical results of test model and of scaled down structure were taken. Preliminary studies were placed on the integration between shaking table test and numerical simulation.
引文
[2] Moncarz, P. D., and Krawinkler, H. Theory and Application of Experimental Model Analysis in Earthquake Engineering[R]. Report No. 50, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 1981:45-58
[3] H. G. Harris, G. M. Sabnis. Structural modeling and experimental techniques[M]. CRC Press, 1999:23-38
[4] Corbi, O. Shape Memory Alloys and Their Application in Structural Oscillations Attenuation [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2003, (11):387-402
[5] Guo, A.X., Xu, Y.L., Wu, B. Seismic Reliability Analysis of Hysteretic Structure with Viscoelastic Dampers [J]. Engineering Structures. 2002, (24):373-383
[6] Phiilip J. Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay [D]. Berkley, University of California. 1998:187-192
[7] Yasuda Susumu. Large-scale shaking table tests on pile foundations in liquefied ground [A]. In: Proc of Earthquake Engineering. New Zealand.2000:187-192
[8] K.J. Elwood. Shake Table Tests and Analytical Studies on the Gravity Load Collapse of RC Frames [D]. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley. 2002:68-76
[9] Kim, Y. and Kabeyasawa, T. Dynamic test and analysis of an eccentric reinforced concrete frame to collapse. Proc. of the 13th WCEE. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. 2004, (381):252-256
[10] Uang, C. M., and Bertero, V. V.. Earthquake Simulation Tests and Associated Studies of a 0.3-Scale Model of a Six-Story Concentrically Braced Steel Structure[R]. Report No. UBS/EERC-86/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California. 1986:25-32
[11] Rodriguez, M. E., Restrepo, J. I., and Blandon, J. J.. Shaking Table Tests of a Four-Story Minia ture Steel Building-Model Validation [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2006, 22(3), 755-780
[12] Meng Qingli. Dynamics simulation experimental method study about RC structure's nonlinear performance in earthquake simulation tests [J]. 3ICEE, NANJING, 2004:38-46
[13] Samali, B., Dowling, D.M. and Li, J. Dynamic response of u-shaped adobe-mudbrick wall units [A] Australian Structural Engineering Conference[C]. Newcastle, N.S.W. 2005:11-14
[14] Samali, B., Dowling D.M. and Li, J., Dynamic testing of unreinforced u-shaped adobemudbrick wall unit[A], ACMSM 18[C], Perth, Western Australia, 2004:505-510
[15] W. P. Donlon and J. F. Hall. Shaking table study of Concrete Gravity Dam Monoliths[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1991,(20): 769-786
[16]周颖,吕西林等.不同结构的振动台试验模型等效设计方法[J].结构工程师.2006,22(4):37-40
[17]李德寅,王邦媚,林亚超.结构模型试验[M].北京:科学出版社.1996:13-30
[18]杨俊杰.相似理论与结构模型试验[M].武汉:武汉理工大学出版社.2005:15-20
[19]周美立.相似系统论[M].科学技术文献出版社,1994:130-145
[20]周颖,卢文胜,吕西林.模拟地震振动台模型实用设计方法[J].结构工程师.2003,(3):30-34
[2]]沈德建,吕西林.地震模拟振动台及模型试验研究进展[J].结构工程师.2006,22(6):55-59
[22]清华大学抗震抗爆工程研究室.结构模型振动台试验研究[M].清华大学出版社.1990:10-16
[23]朱彤,林皋等.混凝土仿真材料特性及其应用的试验研究[J].水力发电学报.2004,23(4):31-37
[24]吕西林,孟春光,田野.消能减震高层方钢管混凝土框架结构振动台试验研究和弹塑性时程分析[J].地震工程与工程振动.2006,26(4):231-238
[25]鲁 亮,吕西林.振动台模型试验中一种消除重力失真效应的动力相似关系研究[J].结构工程师.2001,(4):45-48
[26]张敏政.地震模拟实验中相似律应用的若干问题[J].地震工程与工程振动.1997,17(2):52-58
[27]黄维平,邬瑞锋,张前国.配重不足时的动力试验模型与原型相似关系问题的探讨[J].地震工程与工程振动.1994,14(4):64-71
[28]张敏政,孟庆利,刘晓明.建筑结构的地震模拟试验研究[J].工程抗震.2003,(4):31-35
[29]刘晓明.地震模拟振动台模型试验的若干偏差分析[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所,1998:27-35
[30]Kim,W.,El-Attar,A.and White,R.N..Small-scale modeling techniques for reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic loads[R].Technical report NCEER-88-0041,State University of New York at Buffalo,New York.1988:46-49
[31]Kim,N.S.,Lee,J.H.etc.An equivalent multi-phase similitude law for pseudodynarnic test on small-scale RC models[J].Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea.2003,7(6):101-108
[32]Kim,N.S.,Kwak,Y.H.etc.Modified similitude law for pseudodynamic test on small-scale steel models.Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea,2003,7(6):49-57
[33]孙峰,阎维明等.某高层建筑模型振动台试验结果分析[J].地震工程与工程振动.1998,18(4):61-67
[34]林皋,朱彤,林蓓.结构动力模型试验的相似技巧[J].大连理工大学学报.2000,40(1):01-08
[35]熊耀清,姚谦峰.CFRP加固RC框架结构振动台试验及损伤机理分析[J].北京交通大学学报.2006,30(1):25-29
[36]石启印,李爱群等.北京机场新塔台结构振动台试验研究[J].工业建筑.2004,34(9):40-45
[37]赵斌,卢文胜等.超高层剪力墙(短肢剪力墙)-筒体结构整体模型振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2004(3):14-21
[38]陈作勤,黄襄云,周福霖.超高层结构设计及模拟地震振动台试验研究[J].工程力学(增刊).2003,443-447
[39]徐磊,施卫星等.超高层结构整体模型振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构学报.2001,21(5):15-19
[40]陆华纲.超高层筒体结构模型地震模拟振动台试验研究[D].大连理工大学.2002:36-42
[41]熊学玉,王俊等.大跨预应力混凝土井式梁框架结构的振动台试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2005(3):44-51
[42]熊学玉,耿耀明等.大跨预应力混凝土空间框架结构的地震振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005(1):102-107
[43]刘劲松,裘涛等.带钢桁架转换层框架剪力墙结构抗震性能研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版).2005,39(1):108-113
[44]沈朝勇,周福霖等.带连廊-复杂体型高层结构模型试验研究[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版).2004,3(2):143-149
[45]崔峰,戴国亮等.带填充墙的新型梁柱(板柱)组合结构振动台试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版).2002,32(3):460-465
[46]叶献国,徐勤等.地震中受损钢筋混凝土建筑弹塑性时程分析与振动台试验研究[J].土木工程学报.2003,36(12):20-25
[47]马恒春,陈健云等.非对称剪力墙-简体超高层结构的振动台试验研究[J].结构工程师.2004,(2):69-74
[48]闫锋,吕西林.附加与不附加粘滞阻尼墙的RC框架对比振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2005,(5):8-16
[49]叶艳霞,梁兴文等.复杂框支剪力墙结构空间弹塑性分析[J].世界地震工程.2005.21(2):136-140
[50]苏娟,李洪泉.钢砼模型在双向水平地震力下的振动台试验[J].淮阴工学院学报.2003(3):62-66
[51]龚治国,吕西林等.混合结构体系高层建筑模拟地震振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动.2004,24(4):99-105
[52]周颖,吕西林,卢文胜.立面开大洞短肢剪力墙-筒体结构的动力试验研究及有限元计算分析[J].建筑结构学报.2004,25(5):10-16
[53]杨巧荣,陈建秋等.某全钢结构地震模拟振动台试验和理论研究[J].世界地震工程.2003,19(3):97-103
[54]吕西林,卢文胜等.上海环球金融中心大厦结构模型振动台抗震试验[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(3):57-63
[55]邹昀,吕西林等.上海环球金融中心大厦整体结构振动台试验设计[J].地震工程与工程振动.2005.25(4):54-59
[56]朱杰江,吕西林,邹昀.上海环球金融中心模型结构振动台试验与理论分析的对比研究[J].土木工程学报.2005,38(10):18-26
[57]孙五一.万州长江大桥地震模拟振动台试验研究[D].武汉理工大学.2004:36-38
[58]许崇法.斜拉桥混凝土主梁桥面板模型试验与分析[D].东南大学.2004:42-43
[59]姜鋆,王翠坤等.一幢特别不规则高层建筑结构模型的振动台试验研究[J].建筑科学.2005,25(1):19-25
[60]周立超,杨晓东等.整体预应力板(梁)柱体系模型振动台试验模型相似关系及其实践[J].昆明理工大学学报(理工版).2003,28(3):105-107
[61]孙建刚,李岩.八层大开间混凝土砌体结构模型隔震性能试验[J].大庆石油学院学报.2005,29(1):94-03
[62]韩丽婷.由振动台试验结果反推原型结构地震反应注记[J].南京工业大学学报.2004,26(6):25-28
[63]C.S.Li,S.S.E.,Lam,etc.shaking table test of a 1:20 scale high-rise building with a transfer plate system[J].Journal of Structural Engineering.2006,132(11):1732-1744
[64]周定松.弹塑性位移谱法与振动台试验比值的数值分布特征[J].工程抗震与加固改造.2005,27(增刊):51-55
[65]童菊仙,徐礼华等.方钢管混凝土框架模型振动台试验研究[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2005,27(3):65-69
[66]H.霍斯多尔夫著.徐正忠等译.结构模型分析[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.1986:45-56
[67]左东启等.模型试验的理论和方法[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1984:105-120
[68]Silvia Mazzoni,Frank McKenna,Michael H.Scott and Gregory L.Fenves.OpenSees Users Manual[R].PEER,University of California,Berkeley.2007:73-82
[69]Park R.,Paulay T.Reinforced Concrete Structures[M].John Wiley & Sons,New York,1975:25-30
[70]朱伯龙,董振祥.钢筋混凝土非线性分析[M].同济大学出版社.1985:1-6
[71]Karsan,I.D.,Jirsa,J.O.Behavior of Concrete under Compressive Loadings[J].Journal of the Structural Division,ASCE.1969,(95):2543-2563
[72]Enricp Spacone,Fillip C.Filippou,Fabio F.Taucer.Fiber beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames:Part Ⅰ.formulation[J].Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics.1996,25(7):711-725
[73]Enricp Spacone,Fillip C.Filippou,Fabio F.Tauter.Fiber beam-column model for nonlinear analysis of R/C frames:Part Ⅱ.Applications[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1996,(25):727-742
[74]Jeeho Lee,Gregory L.Fenves.A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.1998,27(9):937-956
[75]Angelo d'Ambrisi,Filip C.Filippou.Correlation studies on an RC frame shaking-table specimen [J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.1998,26(10):1021-1040
[3] H. G. Harris, G. M. Sabnis. Structural modeling and experimental techniques[M]. CRC Press, 1999:23-38
[4] Corbi, O. Shape Memory Alloys and Their Application in Structural Oscillations Attenuation [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2003, (11):387-402
[5] Guo, A.X., Xu, Y.L., Wu, B. Seismic Reliability Analysis of Hysteretic Structure with Viscoelastic Dampers [J]. Engineering Structures. 2002, (24):373-383
[6] Phiilip J. Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay [D]. Berkley, University of California. 1998:187-192
[7] Yasuda Susumu. Large-scale shaking table tests on pile foundations in liquefied ground [A]. In: Proc of Earthquake Engineering. New Zealand.2000:187-192
[8] K.J. Elwood. Shake Table Tests and Analytical Studies on the Gravity Load Collapse of RC Frames [D]. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley. 2002:68-76
[9] Kim, Y. and Kabeyasawa, T. Dynamic test and analysis of an eccentric reinforced concrete frame to collapse. Proc. of the 13th WCEE. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. 2004, (381):252-256
[10] Uang, C. M., and Bertero, V. V.. Earthquake Simulation Tests and Associated Studies of a 0.3-Scale Model of a Six-Story Concentrically Braced Steel Structure[R]. Report No. UBS/EERC-86/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California. 1986:25-32
[11] Rodriguez, M. E., Restrepo, J. I., and Blandon, J. J.. Shaking Table Tests of a Four-Story Minia ture Steel Building-Model Validation [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2006, 22(3), 755-780
[12] Meng Qingli. Dynamics simulation experimental method study about RC structure's nonlinear performance in earthquake simulation tests [J]. 3ICEE, NANJING, 2004:38-46
[13] Samali, B., Dowling, D.M. and Li, J. Dynamic response of u-shaped adobe-mudbrick wall units [A] Australian Structural Engineering Conference[C]. Newcastle, N.S.W. 2005:11-14
[14] Samali, B., Dowling D.M. and Li, J., Dynamic testing of unreinforced u-shaped adobemudbrick wall unit[A], ACMSM 18[C], Perth, Western Australia, 2004:505-510
[15] W. P. Donlon and J. F. Hall. Shaking table study of Concrete Gravity Dam Monoliths[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1991,(20): 769-786
[16]周颖,吕西林等.不同结构的振动台试验模型等效设计方法[J].结构工程师.2006,22(4):37-40
[17]李德寅,王邦媚,林亚超.结构模型试验[M].北京:科学出版社.1996:13-30
[18]杨俊杰.相似理论与结构模型试验[M].武汉:武汉理工大学出版社.2005:15-20
[19]周美立.相似系统论[M].科学技术文献出版社,1994:130-145
[20]周颖,卢文胜,吕西林.模拟地震振动台模型实用设计方法[J].结构工程师.2003,(3):30-34
[2]]沈德建,吕西林.地震模拟振动台及模型试验研究进展[J].结构工程师.2006,22(6):55-59
[22]清华大学抗震抗爆工程研究室.结构模型振动台试验研究[M].清华大学出版社.1990:10-16
[23]朱彤,林皋等.混凝土仿真材料特性及其应用的试验研究[J].水力发电学报.2004,23(4):31-37
[24]吕西林,孟春光,田野.消能减震高层方钢管混凝土框架结构振动台试验研究和弹塑性时程分析[J].地震工程与工程振动.2006,26(4):231-238
[25]鲁 亮,吕西林.振动台模型试验中一种消除重力失真效应的动力相似关系研究[J].结构工程师.2001,(4):45-48
[26]张敏政.地震模拟实验中相似律应用的若干问题[J].地震工程与工程振动.1997,17(2):52-58
[27]黄维平,邬瑞锋,张前国.配重不足时的动力试验模型与原型相似关系问题的探讨[J].地震工程与工程振动.1994,14(4):64-71
[28]张敏政,孟庆利,刘晓明.建筑结构的地震模拟试验研究[J].工程抗震.2003,(4):31-35
[29]刘晓明.地震模拟振动台模型试验的若干偏差分析[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所,1998:27-35
[30]Kim,W.,El-Attar,A.and White,R.N..Small-scale modeling techniques for reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic loads[R].Technical report NCEER-88-0041,State University of New York at Buffalo,New York.1988:46-49
[31]Kim,N.S.,Lee,J.H.etc.An equivalent multi-phase similitude law for pseudodynarnic test on small-scale RC models[J].Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea.2003,7(6):101-108
[32]Kim,N.S.,Kwak,Y.H.etc.Modified similitude law for pseudodynamic test on small-scale steel models.Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea,2003,7(6):49-57
[33]孙峰,阎维明等.某高层建筑模型振动台试验结果分析[J].地震工程与工程振动.1998,18(4):61-67
[34]林皋,朱彤,林蓓.结构动力模型试验的相似技巧[J].大连理工大学学报.2000,40(1):01-08
[35]熊耀清,姚谦峰.CFRP加固RC框架结构振动台试验及损伤机理分析[J].北京交通大学学报.2006,30(1):25-29
[36]石启印,李爱群等.北京机场新塔台结构振动台试验研究[J].工业建筑.2004,34(9):40-45
[37]赵斌,卢文胜等.超高层剪力墙(短肢剪力墙)-筒体结构整体模型振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2004(3):14-21
[38]陈作勤,黄襄云,周福霖.超高层结构设计及模拟地震振动台试验研究[J].工程力学(增刊).2003,443-447
[39]徐磊,施卫星等.超高层结构整体模型振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构学报.2001,21(5):15-19
[40]陆华纲.超高层筒体结构模型地震模拟振动台试验研究[D].大连理工大学.2002:36-42
[41]熊学玉,王俊等.大跨预应力混凝土井式梁框架结构的振动台试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2005(3):44-51
[42]熊学玉,耿耀明等.大跨预应力混凝土空间框架结构的地震振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005(1):102-107
[43]刘劲松,裘涛等.带钢桁架转换层框架剪力墙结构抗震性能研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版).2005,39(1):108-113
[44]沈朝勇,周福霖等.带连廊-复杂体型高层结构模型试验研究[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版).2004,3(2):143-149
[45]崔峰,戴国亮等.带填充墙的新型梁柱(板柱)组合结构振动台试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版).2002,32(3):460-465
[46]叶献国,徐勤等.地震中受损钢筋混凝土建筑弹塑性时程分析与振动台试验研究[J].土木工程学报.2003,36(12):20-25
[47]马恒春,陈健云等.非对称剪力墙-简体超高层结构的振动台试验研究[J].结构工程师.2004,(2):69-74
[48]闫锋,吕西林.附加与不附加粘滞阻尼墙的RC框架对比振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2005,(5):8-16
[49]叶艳霞,梁兴文等.复杂框支剪力墙结构空间弹塑性分析[J].世界地震工程.2005.21(2):136-140
[50]苏娟,李洪泉.钢砼模型在双向水平地震力下的振动台试验[J].淮阴工学院学报.2003(3):62-66
[51]龚治国,吕西林等.混合结构体系高层建筑模拟地震振动台试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动.2004,24(4):99-105
[52]周颖,吕西林,卢文胜.立面开大洞短肢剪力墙-筒体结构的动力试验研究及有限元计算分析[J].建筑结构学报.2004,25(5):10-16
[53]杨巧荣,陈建秋等.某全钢结构地震模拟振动台试验和理论研究[J].世界地震工程.2003,19(3):97-103
[54]吕西林,卢文胜等.上海环球金融中心大厦结构模型振动台抗震试验[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(3):57-63
[55]邹昀,吕西林等.上海环球金融中心大厦整体结构振动台试验设计[J].地震工程与工程振动.2005.25(4):54-59
[56]朱杰江,吕西林,邹昀.上海环球金融中心模型结构振动台试验与理论分析的对比研究[J].土木工程学报.2005,38(10):18-26
[57]孙五一.万州长江大桥地震模拟振动台试验研究[D].武汉理工大学.2004:36-38
[58]许崇法.斜拉桥混凝土主梁桥面板模型试验与分析[D].东南大学.2004:42-43
[59]姜鋆,王翠坤等.一幢特别不规则高层建筑结构模型的振动台试验研究[J].建筑科学.2005,25(1):19-25
[60]周立超,杨晓东等.整体预应力板(梁)柱体系模型振动台试验模型相似关系及其实践[J].昆明理工大学学报(理工版).2003,28(3):105-107
[61]孙建刚,李岩.八层大开间混凝土砌体结构模型隔震性能试验[J].大庆石油学院学报.2005,29(1):94-03
[62]韩丽婷.由振动台试验结果反推原型结构地震反应注记[J].南京工业大学学报.2004,26(6):25-28
[63]C.S.Li,S.S.E.,Lam,etc.shaking table test of a 1:20 scale high-rise building with a transfer plate system[J].Journal of Structural Engineering.2006,132(11):1732-1744
[64]周定松.弹塑性位移谱法与振动台试验比值的数值分布特征[J].工程抗震与加固改造.2005,27(增刊):51-55
[65]童菊仙,徐礼华等.方钢管混凝土框架模型振动台试验研究[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2005,27(3):65-69
[66]H.霍斯多尔夫著.徐正忠等译.结构模型分析[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.1986:45-56
[67]左东启等.模型试验的理论和方法[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1984:105-120
[68]Silvia Mazzoni,Frank McKenna,Michael H.Scott and Gregory L.Fenves.OpenSees Users Manual[R].PEER,University of California,Berkeley.2007:73-82
[69]Park R.,Paulay T.Reinforced Concrete Structures[M].John Wiley & Sons,New York,1975:25-30
[70]朱伯龙,董振祥.钢筋混凝土非线性分析[M].同济大学出版社.1985:1-6
[71]Karsan,I.D.,Jirsa,J.O.Behavior of Concrete under Compressive Loadings[J].Journal of the Structural Division,ASCE.1969,(95):2543-2563
[72]Enricp Spacone,Fillip C.Filippou,Fabio F.Taucer.Fiber beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames:Part Ⅰ.formulation[J].Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics.1996,25(7):711-725
[73]Enricp Spacone,Fillip C.Filippou,Fabio F.Tauter.Fiber beam-column model for nonlinear analysis of R/C frames:Part Ⅱ.Applications[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1996,(25):727-742
[74]Jeeho Lee,Gregory L.Fenves.A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.1998,27(9):937-956
[75]Angelo d'Ambrisi,Filip C.Filippou.Correlation studies on an RC frame shaking-table specimen [J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.1998,26(10):1021-1040