用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于博弈视角的中国安全生产管制体制运行研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
改革开放之后,我国经济得到了快速发展,但安全生产问题已成为制约经济发展的重要因素。建国后,国家对企业安全生产问题十分重视。为了更好地解决我国面临的安全生产问题,我国的安全生产管制体制几经变迁,最终形成了“国家监察、地方监管、企业负责”的管制体制,但目前该体制的运行效果还不是很理想。造成这种状况的主要原因在于:安全生产管制体制涉及的三方主体之间的利益目标并不一致,三方主体为了各自利益互相进行博弈,这就不免会对政府管制效果产生消极影响。只有对这种利益不一致前提下的三方主体关系进行分析,寻找使我国现行安全生产体制有效运行的方法和途径,才能充分发挥我国现行安全生产管制体制对企业安全生产的保障作用,大幅度降低工伤事故发生率,促进社会经济健康有序发展。
     在此背景下,本文以“基于博弈视角的中国安全生产管制体制运行研究”为题进行研究。本文首先对其他学者的研究成果进行了综述,在此基础上,展开了本文的研究。本文的研究内容可分为三大部分:
     第一部分是论文的第3章。首先,介绍了我国的安全生产管制体制现状;其次,介绍了美国、英国、日本的安全生产管制体制现状;最后,分析了美国、英国、日本安全生产管制体制建设经验对我国的借鉴意义。第一部分为下文的研究提供了必要性支持。
     第二部分是论文的第4-7章。主要分析了安全生产管制体制中涉及的三方主体之间的博弈关系。
     第4章针对“目前我国安全生产监管实践的主流是好的,但也存在某些腐败现象”的现实,分两种情况——存在腐败的情况和正常情况,对完全信息条件下的地方政府监管机制进行分析。
     在第5章中,首先,运用委托代理理论来分析不完全信息条件下地方政府与企业之间建立契约激励机制的可能性和有效性:其次,运用信号理论建立信号博弈模型来分析解决企业逆向选择问题的途径。
     在第6章中,首先,对安全生产管制体制中的中央政府和地方政府的关系进行分析;其次,构建完全信息博弈模型来分析完全信息条件下中央政府监察机制有效性问题;最后,运用委托代理理论分析不完全信息条件下针对地方约激励机制设计问题。
     在第7章中,运用演化经济学理论分析了不完全信息条件下中央政府施对企业行为的间接影响。第7章中讨论分析的中央政府监察措施只包括施和惩罚措施。
     第三部分是论文的第8章。在第二部分研究的基础上,第三部分阐我国安全生产管制体制运行效果的对策。
     第9章是论文的研究结论和未来展望。首先,对前文研究进行总指出研究的不足;最后,对未来的研究方向进行展望。
     本文主要在以下几个方面进行了创新:(1)运用博弈方法论证监管无限次博弈中企业进行安全生产投资的收益大小对企业策略选择结合委托代理理论,运用博弈方法建立了存在瞒报情况下的契约激励建立信号博弈模型分析安全生产监管过程中可能会出现的逆向选择(?)用演化博弈方法研究了中央政府奖惩措施对企业行为的间接影响。
After the reform and opening, the Chinese economy has got rapid development, but safety producting problems have already become the important restricting factors to economy's development. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, the People's Republic of China attaches great importance to the problem of the enterprises' safety producting. In order to solve the problems better which safety producting problem our nation faced, our country's safety producting regulating system undergoes several changes, eventually form the safety producting regulating system as follows: "state monitoring, local regulating, enterprise responsible", but now the system's operation effect is not very ideal. The reason which causes this condition is as follows: the interests goals of three subjects which are involved in the safety producting regulating system are not consistent, the three subjects game each other for their respective benefits, it is unavoidable make negative influences to the government regulating effect. Only analyze the three subjects'relationship under the premise that the interests of the three subjects is not consistent, look for the methods and ways which could make the current safety producting regulating system effective operation, we could bring the current safety producting regulating system into full play in the enterprises'safety producting security role, greatly reduce the industrial accident rate, promote the social economy's healthy and orderly development.
     Under this background, this paper is concentrated on "The Study on the Chinese Safety Producting Regulating System's Operation from the Perspective of Game". In this paper, first, summarize the other scholars'research results, and based on this, launched the article's research. The article's research contents can be divided into three sections:
     The first part is the chapter 3. Firstly, introduce the Chinese safety producting regulating system; secondly, introduce the safety producting regulating system of the United States, Britain, Japan; finally, study the reference which the safety producting regulating system construction experience the America, Britain, Japan give to our country. The first part provides a necessity support to the below research.
     The second part is chapter 4~7. Mainly analyses the three subjects'relationship of the game.
     Chapter 4 is aimed at the reality "at present, the mainstream of our country's safety producting regulating practice is good, but there also have some corruption phenomenon", distinguish two kinds of circumstance——the circumstance under the condition of corruption and normal circumstance, analyse the local government's regulating mechanism under the condition of complete information.
     In chapter 5, firstly, use the principal-agent theory to analyze the possibility and effectiveness of contract incentive mechanism which is established by the local government and enterprises under the condition of incomplete information; secondly, use the signal theory establish signal game model to analyze the approach of solving the problem of enterprises'adverse selection.
     In chapter 6, firstly, analyze the relationship of the central government and local government in the safety producting regulating system; secondly, construct the game model under the condition of the complete information to analyze the validity problem of the central government's surveillance mechanism which is under the condition of complete information; Finally, use the principal-agent theory analyse contracts incentive mechanism design problem which aim at local government under the condition of incomplete information.
     In chapter 7, use evolutionary economics theory analyse the problem of the central government monitoring measures' indirect impact which is put on enterprise's behavior under the condition of incomplete information. The central government's monitoring measures which is discussed and analysed in the chapter 7 only include measures of reward and punishment.
     The third part is the chapter 8. On the basis of the second part's research, the third part expounds the countermeasures of improving Chinese safety producting regulating system's operation effect.
     The chapter 9 is the research conclusion and prospect. Firstly, summarizes the above research; secondly, point out the insufficiency; finally, give the prospect for the future research direction.
     The paper mainly innovate in the following aspects:(1) use game method demonstrates the influence of safety producting investment's profit which aim at the enterprise's strategy choice in the course of the game which have infinite times; (2) combining with the principal-agent theory, use game method to establish the contract incentive model under the condition of existing the conceal; (3) establish a signal game-theory to analyse adverse selection problem which may appear in the course of safety producting regulating; (4) use the evolutionary game method to study the indirect impact of the central government's measures of reward and punishment on enterprise's behavior.
引文
[1]薛剑光.安全生产监督与管理的量化表达方法的研究[D].湖南:中南大学,2010.
    [2]全国安全生产月咨询服务活动安全检查(监察)方法内容及程序[N/OL].[2007-04-24].http://www.hbsafety.cn/article/509/511/200704/24561.shtml.
    [3]各级人民政府在安全生产方面的基本职责[EB/OL].[2004-10-14]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/2004-10/14/content_42399.htm.
    [4]中华人民共和国安全法[EB/OL].[2006-05-27]. http://www.gov.cn/ztzl/2006-05/27/content_292725.htm.
    [5]温家宝总理在全国安全生产工作会议上的讲话[C/OL].[2006-01-25]. http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2006-01/25/content_171180.htm.
    [6]白景坤.制度、体制和机制关系辨析[J].管理观察,2008(8):23-24.
    [7]赵正宏,王亚宏,王瑞霞.加大安全投入的科学原理及具体运作[J].石油化工安全技术,2002(3):25-27.
    [8]赵千里,周松忠,党明智.现代企业安全投入运作框架的探讨[J].采矿技术,2003,(2):18-20.
    [9]陈万金,刘素霞,杨涛.安全投入统计指标体系探讨[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(7):3842.
    [10]梅强.安全投资方向决策的研究[J].中国安全科学学报,1999,9(5):42-47.
    [11]尹迁光.政府如何解决外部性问题[J].四川财政,2002(9):6-7.
    [12]雷鸣.外部性内部化:排污权交易[J].现代商业,2009(8):285.
    [13]刘海二.论外部性及其解决途径[J].山西财政税务专科学校学报,2009(6):68-70.
    [14]周西贤,周艳.正外部性内在化的途径分析[J].和田师范专科学校学报(汉文综合版),2010(4):14-15.
    [15]刘东霞,高霞,于东海.联合风险投资的道德风险与逆向选择[J].价值工程,2010(29):22-24.
    [16]谢识予.经济博弈论(第二版)[J].上海:复旦大学出版社,2002:277-290.
    [17]欧阳越秀,李贞玉.逆向选择、系统性风险与政策性农业保险可持续发展[J].保险研究,2010(4):66-71.
    [18]郭小建,党小刚.工程项目管理逆向选择的博弈论分析[J].现代商贸工业,2010(22):41-42.
    [19]蒋抒博.美国社会性管制的经济性分析[D].吉林:吉林大学,2009.
    [20]Cary Coglianese, JenniferNash,Todd Olmstead.Performance-Based Regulation:Prospects and Limitations in Health, Safety and Environmental Protection[J].Administrative Law Review,2003,(4):705-730.
    [21]W.Kip Viscusi.Risk by Choice:Regulating health and safety in the Workplace[M]. Cambridge, MA.:Harvard university Press,1983:55.
    [22]K.Robert Keiser.The New Regulation of Health and Safety[J].Political Science Quarterly, 1980,95(3):479-491.
    [23]Peter Dorman.The Economics of Safety, Health, and Well-Being at work:An Overview, Infocus Program on Safework[A].International Labour Organisation, The Evergreen State College,2000.
    [24]Peter Dorman.Three Preliminary Papers on the Economics of Occupational Safety and Health:An Introduction, Geneva[A].The International Labour Organization,2000.
    [25]Michael J.Moore, W.Kip Viscusi.Promoting Safety Through Workers'Compensation:The Efficacy and Net Wage Costs of Injury Insurance[J].The RAND Journal of Economics, 1989,20(4):499-515.
    [26]W.Kip Viscusi.Product Liability and Regulation:Establishing the Appropriate Institutional Division of Labor[J].The American Economic Review,1988,78(2):300-304.
    [27]W.Kip Viscusi.The Impact of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation[J].The Bell Journal of Economics,1979,10(1):117-140.
    [28]William P.Curinton. Safety Regulation and Workplace Injuries[J].Southern Economic Journal,2001,53(1):51-72.
    [29]Lanoie,Paul&Sophie Tavenas.Costs and Benefits of Preventing Workplace Accidents:The Case of Participatory Ergonomics[J].Safety Science,1996,24(3):181-196.
    [30]李红娟.中国煤矿安全规制效果的实证研究[D].辽宁:东北财经大学,2007.
    [31]马宇,李中东,韩存.政策因素对我国煤炭行业安全生产影响的实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2008(8):54-58.
    [32]文军.航空运输安全监管的博弈分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2008(3):83-87.
    [33]谭玲玲,宁云才.煤矿安全步出“囚徒困境”的博弈分析[J].中国矿业,2007(9):36-38.
    [34]卢晓庆,赵国浩.煤炭安全生产中政府与企业的博弈分析[J].能源技术与管理,2009(5):113-115.
    [35]周敏,肖忠海.煤炭企业安全生产监管效能的博弈分析[J].中国矿业大学学报,2006(1):54-60.
    [36]彭秋玲,李丽娜.煤矿安全生产的博弈分析[J].价值工程,2008(5):132-134.
    [37]王冰,黄岱.信息不对称与内部性政府管制失败及对策研究[J].江海学刊,2005(2):53-57.
    [38]付茂林.煤矿安全监察进化博弈分析[D].上海:复旦大学,2008.
    [39]梅强,马国建,杜建国,刘重才.中小企业安全生产管制路径演化研究[J].中国管理科学, 2009(2):160-168.
    [40]Pigou A.The Economics of Welfare[M].London:MacMillan,1938.
    [41]Stigler GJ. The Theory of Economic Regulation[J].Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1977(2):3-21.
    [42]薛澜,张强,钟开斌.危机管理:转型期中国面临的挑战[J].中国软科学,2003(4):6-12.
    [43]钟开斌.遵从与变通:煤矿安全监管中的地方行为分析[J].公共管理学报,2006(2):70-75.
    [44]童磊,丁日佳.煤矿安全委托代理的博弈分析[J].集团经济研究,2006(9):143-144.
    [45]郝英奇,刘金兰.动力机制研究的理论基础与发展趋势[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(6):50.
    [46]夏永祥,王常雄.中央政府与地方政府的政策博弈及其治理[J].当代经济科学,2006(2):45-51.
    [47]邸振伟,侯天佐.中央和地方政府利益关系的博弈分析[J].渤海工学院学报(社会科学版),2007(2):51-53.
    [48]黄再胜.公共部门组织激励理论探析[J].外国经济与管理,2005(1):41.
    [49]肖兴志.基于煤矿利益的安全规制路径分析[J].经济与管理研究,2006(7):69-72.
    [50]朱杰堂.现代激励理论在规范地方政府行为中的作用研究[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报,2001(1):14-18.
    [51]肖兴志,李红娟.煤矿安全规制的纵向和横向配置:国际比较与启示[J].财经论丛,2006(4):1-8.
    [52]肖兴志等.中国煤矿事故频发的博弈解释[J].财经问题研究,2007(7):33.
    [53]胡文国,刘凌云.我国煤矿生产安全监管中的博弈分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(8):94-109.
    [54]陈黎敏,蔡惠平.安全生产监管的博弈论分析[J].数学的实践与认识,2008(11):7-10.
    [55]W.Kip Viscusi.Wealth Effects and Earnings Premiums for Job Harzards[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1978,60(3):408-416.
    [56]H.Lorne Carmichael.Repuatations for Safety:Market Performance and Policy Remedies [J]. Journal of Labor Economics,1986,4(4):458-472.
    [57]Harrell, W.A. Perceived risk of occupational injury:Control over pace of work and blue-collar versus white collar work. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1990(70):1351-1359.
    [58]Mark Harcourt.Health and safety Reform:A Review Of Four Different Approaches [J]. Journal of Industrial Relations,1996,38(3):359-376.
    [59]NSW Minerals Council(2003),Guidelines health and safety inductions for NSW mines, February2003,http://www.nswmin.com.au/ohs/publications.shtml.
    [60]Spangenberg, S., Baart&C.Dyreborg, J.et al.Factors Contributing to the Differences in Work Related Injury Rates between Danish and Swedish Construction Workers [J]. Safety Science.2003,41:517-530.
    [61]Akerlof.The Market for Lemon's:Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1970,Vo 1.84,pp488-500.
    [62]Michael Grossman.On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health [J].The Journal of Political Economy,1972,80(2):223-255.
    [63]Alan C.McMillan.Injury Prevention in our Global World[J].The 2nd ChinaInternational Forum on Work Safety,2004,9 (2)
    [64]Sam Peltzman.Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.The Journal of Law and Economic,1976, Vol.19.
    [65]Pedro, Antao, Soares.Fault-tree Models of Accident Scenarios of RoPax Vessels[J]. International Journal of Automation and computing,2006,2:107-116.
    [66]青木昌彦.周黎安译.比较制度分析[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2001:2-10.
    [67]程洁.矿难,谁来埋单[J].中国社会保障,2006(3):12-13.
    [68]冯勤超,王丽丽,江孝感.中央与地方政府交叉事权的委托—代理模型[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(3):56-58.
    [69]阚大学,罗良文.腐败与经济增长的关系实证研究——基于多国面板数据的分析[J].经济管理,2010(1):18-24.
    [70]康纪田.对矿难背后深层次问题的思考[J].探索与争鸣,2005(5):28-29.
    [71]王天龙.最优贿赂、腐败与矿难事故的内生性-解释与防治矿难的经济模型[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010(2):119-125.
    [72]Kaushik Basu,Sudipto Bhattacharya, Ajit Mishra.Notes on Bribery and the control of corruption[J], Journal of Public Economics,1992 (48):349-359.
    [73]Gary S.Becker, Crime and Punishment:An Economic Approach[J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1968(2):169-217.
    [74]李晓鹏.我国现阶段反腐败存在的问题和对策研究[J].改革与开放,2010(3):4245.
    [75]张鼎良.权力腐败产生的原因及预防对策[J].党校党建与思想教育,2010(4):30-31.
    [76]李燕华.谈行政腐败的危害及其治理[J].岱宗学刊,2009(4):24-25.
    [77]葛素红,王振宏.辽宁凤城隐瞒多起煤矿事故安全监管形同虚设[J].半月谈,2007(3)
    [78]郑煤集团新密分公司瞒报事故天价私了[N/OL].煤炭网http://www.coal.com.cn/ Gratis/2010-7-14/ArticleDisplay_239715.shtml,2010-7-14.
    [79]顾颖.制度与发展[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
    [80]K.J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values (New York:Wiley,1951,1963),10:W.J. Baumol, Economic Theory and Operations Analysis,4th ed. (London:Prentice-Hall,1977), 431.
    [81]思拉恩.埃格特森.新制度经济学[M]吴经邦等译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
    [82]戴维·M·克雷普斯.博弈论与经济模型[M],邓方译.北京:商务印书馆,2006.
    [83]Jensen, M.C and W.Meckling:Theory of the Finn:Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Capital Structure[J], Journal of Financial Economics,1976, (3):332-228。
    [84]张维迎.企业的企业家.契约理论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1995.
    [85]范明,牛刚.现代企业理论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
    [86]冯杰,李思义,张发明.以安全经济学原理探讨煤矿事故的控制途径[J].煤矿安全,2000(9):48-50.
    [87]王晓斌,储皖中.滴血的私了协议为事故瞒报壮胆[N/OL].法制网,http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/bm/content/2007-05/11/content_614285.htm,2007-05-11.
    [88]潘瑞胤,兰亚佳.某大型钢铁企业工伤事故原因分析[J].现代预防医学,2006(8):1380-1382.
    [89]曹秀海.石钢工伤事故规律分析及对策[J].工业安全与环保,2005(8):60-62.
    [90]Kingsley E. Abhulimen. Model for risk and reliability analysis of complex production systems:Application to FPSO/flow-Riser system [J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering,2009(33):1306-1321.
    [91]Helen H. Lou,Jayachandran Chandrasekaran, Rebecca A.Smith. Large-scale dynamic simulation for security assessment of an ethylene oxide manufacturing process[J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering,2006(30):1102-1118.
    [92]F. Rigas a, M. Konstandinidou, P. Centola, GT. Reggio. Safety analysis and risk assessment in a new pesticide production line[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2003(16):103-109.
    [93]余国华.矿山安全生产监管对策研究—以昆明市东川区为例(硕士论文).浙江:浙江大学,2006.
    [94]Anjana Meel, Warren D. Seider, Masoud Soroush. Game theoretic approach to multiobjective designs:Focus on inherent safety[J]. AIChE Journal,2006(1):228-246.
    [95]Mearns, K., Whitaker, S.M., Flin, R. Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Safety Science.2003(41):641-68.
    [96]Zohar, D. Safety climate in industrial organizations:Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology.1980.65(1):96-101.
    [97]Neal, A., Griffin, M.A., Hart, P.M. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science.2000(34):99-109.
    [98]Mohamed, S. Safety climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.2002.128(5):375-384.
    [99]Oliver, A., Cheyne, A., Tomas, J.M., Cox, S. The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.2002(75):473-488.
    [100]Cheyne, A., Cox, S., Oliver, A., Tomas, J.M. Modeling safety climate in the prediction of levels of safety activity. Work and Stress.1998.12(3):255-271.
    [101]胡俊超.国外激励理论的发展和创新—基于“经济人”假设和放宽假设的分析[J].企业经济,2007(4):9-13.
    [102]吕强,王咏军.试论产权、产权方法在解决外部性问题中的作用[J].天津商学院学报,2002(1):20-23.
    [103]陈勇.对国外激励理论的简要回顾和评述[J].中国财经信息资料,2007(7):5-8.
    [104]黄耀杰,陈哗和徐远.政府管制的集团利益理论与激励理论述评[J].技术经济与管理研究,2006(2):23-24.
    [105]常宁“3·21”煤矿重大透水事故4人渎职被查处.[2009-08-27].http://forum.home.news.cn/thread/69872726/1.html.
    [106]1978-2007年受到党纪国法查处的全国重特大生产安全事故(5)[J].劳动保护,2009(5):43-45.
    [107]张秋秋.中国劳动安全规制体制改革研究[D].辽宁:辽宁大学,2007.
    [108]孙庆文,陆柳,严广乐,车宏安.不完全信息条件下演化博弈均衡的稳定性分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003(7):11-16.
    [109]Lutter.R., Morrall, J.S,.Health-Health Analysis:A New Way to Evaluate Health and Safety Regulations[A]. Working Paper.U.S.Office of Management and Budget,1992.
    [110]Pea Samuel.Workman's Compensation and Occupational Safety under Imperfect Information[J].American Economic Review,1981,70:80-92.
    [111]Pransky G.Snyder T, Dembe A, Himmelstein J.Under-report of Working Disorders in the Work-place:A Case Study and Review of the Literature[J].Ergonomics,1999,42:171-182.
    [112]章昌裕.西方经济学原理[M].北京:对外经济贸易出版社,2007:104-150.
    [113]Elias Sanidas.Technology, technical and organizational innovations [J]. economic and societal growth. Technology in Society,2004(26):67-84.
    [114]Smita B. Brunnenneier, Mark A. Cohen.Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries[M].Journal of Enviromnental Economics and Management,2003(45):278-293.
    [115]Klans Rennings.Redefildng innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics,2000 (32):319-332.
    [116]Oi Walter.On the Economics of Industrial Safey[J].Law and Contemporary Problems, 1973(38):669-699.
    [117]Sam Peltzman.George Stigler's Contribution Economic Analysis of Regulation[J].The Journal of Political Economy,1993,101(5):818-832.
    [118]Shanmugan K.R.Compensating Wage Differentials for Work Related Fatal and Injury Accidents[J].The India Journal of Labour Economics,1997(40):26.
    [119]努力发挥教育在反腐倡廉工作中的基础性作用[R/OL].[2006-02-20]. http://www.jrem.cn/content/2006-2/20/2006220172507.htm.
    [120]葛新权,王国成.实验经济学引论:原理.方法.应用.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:1-30.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700