我国夫妻财产制的社会性别分析
摘要
本文尝试用社会性别分析方法审视现行夫妻财产制,开篇引入社会性别的概念,介绍了“社会性别”一词的由来以及在当今社会不断被运用和发展的过程,并指出了把社会性别分析方法引入法学领域的理论价值和现实意义。论文第二章细致分析了现行《婚姻法》夫妻财产制度的规定,指出其成功之处主要表现为进一步体现了婚姻家庭法的人本主义,张扬了人文关怀的精神,强化了对人特别是处于弱势之人的保护。同时论文也强调了现行法的不足之处,它虽然在条文上对男女两性的法律权利义务作出了相同的规定,但从社会性别平等角度来审视,仍可发现有些规定缺乏社会性别意识,它并不能从根本上改变性别的不平等现状,其作为一个阶段性的立法,有些规定仍然存在着缺漏。针对这些缺漏,本文第三章结合社会现实,对夫妻劳动分工进行分析,提出确认家务劳动社会价值以体现性别公正的立法设想;增补夫妻财产补偿请求权制度以真正平等地保护妇女的财产权利的设想;设立法定非常财产制以从总体上遏制夫妻中经济地位较强一方(多为夫方)对较弱一方(多为妻方)财产利益的损害的设想;知识产权的收益和婚姻期间形成的知识产权的期待利益属于夫妻共同财产以及夫妻一方取得的其他无形财产应当属于夫妻共同财产的设想。
The social gender is an analysis category which appears in the West second feminism tide, the feminism scholar thought that the social gender which is almost same with economic system, the political system etc was a sort of humanity's organized activity system and It has social gender system in any culture which means all sorts of social system are divided well into the standard the human“the male”and“the female”in the activity. the social gender is the Primary tissue way of human society, also it is a basic content in person's socialized process.“the social gender analysis”mainly compares the acts the woman and the man takes in the society, lets the man know the female's hardships in social role, simultaneously also lets the female understand the male's difficulty in the social role, thus we can knew their the different requirement for each other, By the way, we can analyze the inequality of resources, responsibility and the division of powers aspect between the male and the female. In the legal domain, the social gender analysis method is important aspect in the legislative process, which is also a kind of brand-new legal analysis angle of view and the method. Our purport was to improve the extant legal system considering fully the male and female difference in the foundation, but not gives a weak trend side (many for female) the more damage compensates.
Introducing the social gender analysis method in the law has important theory values: First, the social gender analysis method has consummated the tradition analysis method system. It obtains from the tradition analysis method's weak point, inspects the society and the law from the sex angle, stressed that puts the female in the gender relations to carry on the analysis. Second, the social gender analysis method was the formulation that provides the rationale of“the sex equality”the law. the social sex analysis method plays the role to set up the fair law because we must conform to the law of development of society theory to make the instruction. The social sex that is introduced into legal science research area, legal regime's design will be more scientific reasonably, thus obtains the positive social effect and has the vital practical significance: First,it is helpful in the widespread international law cultural exchange and the mutual cooperation, thus causes the relation between national to be day by day close. The sex analysis method is one method which many national laws adopt, for the perfect the country law, many countries use foreign advanced law or the reasonable legal regime for reference to compete themselves, with absorption they fuse mutually with various countries law as well as international trail connection. Second, it is helpful in protecting a woman legitimate rights and interests not to eliminate. The social sex analysis method that pursues the equal value idea track the benefit which is closely related with woman to integrate the legal. Third, social sex analysis method is also helpful to inspires us to pay great attention to reality to implement the effect when the inspection equality legal relationship needs, and inspects the modern law the justice and the equal value demand and the actual content.
Present“Marriage law”stipulated the aspect to realize the equality of the sexes to make the outstanding contribution in the husbands and wives property system, strengthened the rationality and maneuverability, it fully considered since China has implemented the market economy, along with the national law to private economy's support, a husbands and wives side or both sides are engaged in production and operating activities brings husbands and wives property quantity and property scope change the husbands and wives property quantity which and the property scope change, as well as the equality of the sexes principle of legality carries out many years later, husbands and wives individual right consciousness awakening. It has further manifested humanism, made widely known the humanities concern spirit, strengthened specially in person's weak trend protection to the human. However, since the reform and open policy the husbands and wives property relations have tended to be complex, we regrettably saw that the legislator only pauses to the husbands and wives property system's revision in the lex lata pattern, but looking from the actual need of adjusts the husbands and wives property relations in the lex lata stipulation is far insufficient, mainly displays in the following several aspects: First, in the husbands and wives property legal regime the thorough solution housework value's question, the joint property rights of the real right occupation have not been able to be partitioned, woman's property right have not obtained the true practical protection. Second, the Supreme People's Court“Tries Divorce Case about the People's court To deal with Property Division Issue Certain Concrete Opinions”the 16th stipulation, namely“before the wedding personal property, in after marriage lives together damages, the consumption, to extinguish naturally loses, when divorce a side request redeems by the husbands and wives joint property, does not prepay holds.”, has neglected in the daily life custom, caused woman's before the wedding property rights not to receive legal the protection. Third, our husbands and wives property system's overall construction is incomplete, it only has stipulated under the usual condition legal property system, but does not have under the corresponding establishment random legal property system to adapts under the difficulty market economy condition in which the husbands and wives complex property relations need day by day. Fourth, the Supreme People's Court“Tries Divorce Case about the People's court To deal with Property Division Issue Certain Concrete Opinions”the 15th stipulation, namely:“when divorce a side not yet obtains the economic interest the intellectual property rights, the normalizing side possesses. When divides the husbands and wives joint property, may act according to the special details, gives the suitable attendance to a side.”, facing the intellectual property rights that will have the great wealth which in the future the possibility will bring, only support the side to give“to give appropriate consideration to”, rather will obviously lose fairly. This is actually to marital another side (often is the bride's side) housework value eliminating, which is mostly unfair to the female. Moreover, present“Marriage law”did not stipulate explicitly to non visible property's diploma, the qualifications and so on that has the imaginary profit legal right.
If a husbands or wives side (often is husband) carries on the development with the husbands and wives joint property majority, to pursue advanced studies, also treats makes a name for oneself when proposes the divorce, then defers to the present legal rule, weak one's right cannot obtain the guarantee.
The present husbands and wives property system did not have the mature social sex idea, and the reasons are: First, the Chinese feudalism tradition“the treatment of women as inferiors”for several thousand year causes present husbands and wives property system to lack the social sex analysis in our country is the historical reason. The Chinese women shoulder the feudal morals the shackles without independent personality causes them to lose takes the person proper value. Second, in the Chinese society man's average income is higher than the woman, this is the realistic reason that generally causes in our country present husbands and wives property system to lack the social sex analysis. The same labor different reward, the female will receive lower than the male, income high home capacity corresponding high somewhat, this also will cause female's not to be high in family status, and the law also not to consider the male and female both sexes different society experience and the actual status fully.
Because of lacking the social sex the angle of view, we pay attention insufficiently to the social reality in male and female both sexes in society's division of labor, the resources hold, specially is approved by the society aspects and so on. The law must take person's basic right as the starting point, the introspection tradition social sex, urges the man and the woman comprehensive healthy development, ends between the men and women not to be equal, realizes the social sex equality. But the equality we formerly pursued is take the male as a goal, stressed that the woman and the man makes the same labor intensity the work, it caused values and so on female's in family free work like birth, housework to neglect finally. Moreover, even if the woman is engaged in similar work with the male, they also do not have to realize the equal pay for equal work completely as well as to obtain same is promoted the opportunity. Therefore the equal insufficiency which has the necessity made up with the social sex equality in the legal formulation initiates. So the social sex analysis method request bases on the social reality, understood fully the woman is truly receives the discrimination as a result of the sex reason, the attention law on the identical thing to the female and the masculine different influence. Regarding the husbands and wives property system's legislation, must embark truthfully the archery target equality, makes a meticulousness, attains the benefit balance complete system between the husbands and wives a weak trend side (mostly is particularly the bride's side), therefore, the author believed that we should consummate from the following several aspects: First, acknowledged that the housework the value, supplements about the housework value stipulation. About the divorce time housework compensation, cancels in the lex lata to request the husband and wife to agree implements the distinction property system the limit. Second, increases stipulated that between the husbands and wives personal property and the husbands and wives joint property's compensation request power, safeguards the husbands and wives property benefit the equality, prevents a side to live together take the marriage as the excuse corrodes another side property rights and interests the behavior. Third, profiting from the overseas legislation to experience and to unify our country's actual situation, we should set up the property system to protect the personal property rights and interests not to receive the harm when the husbands and wives property present relations change. Fourth, the intellectual property rights obtained during marriage ties lasting period should be considered by the family whole investment receiving in exchange for individual right, its income must belong to the husband and wife together all, this income including already the power and the anticipation power. It prevents a husbands and wives side to propose the divorce after the husbands and wives other source's manpower, the physical resource serves, eliminates other source to live together in disguised form to the marriage“the investment”and the imaginary profit. Moreover, a husbands and wives side obtains the diploma and so on, must belong to the achievement which the husbands and wives unite efforts together, the regarding benefit which therefore produces, should take the husbands and wives joint property including the imaginary profit, includes the husbands and wives joint property the scope.
The social gender is an analysis category which appears in the West second feminism tide, the feminism scholar thought that the social gender which is almost same with economic system, the political system etc was a sort of humanity's organized activity system and It has social gender system in any culture which means all sorts of social system are divided well into the standard the human“the male”and“the female”in the activity. the social gender is the Primary tissue way of human society, also it is a basic content in person's socialized process.“the social gender analysis”mainly compares the acts the woman and the man takes in the society, lets the man know the female's hardships in social role, simultaneously also lets the female understand the male's difficulty in the social role, thus we can knew their the different requirement for each other, By the way, we can analyze the inequality of resources, responsibility and the division of powers aspect between the male and the female. In the legal domain, the social gender analysis method is important aspect in the legislative process, which is also a kind of brand-new legal analysis angle of view and the method. Our purport was to improve the extant legal system considering fully the male and female difference in the foundation, but not gives a weak trend side (many for female) the more damage compensates.
Introducing the social gender analysis method in the law has important theory values: First, the social gender analysis method has consummated the tradition analysis method system. It obtains from the tradition analysis method's weak point, inspects the society and the law from the sex angle, stressed that puts the female in the gender relations to carry on the analysis. Second, the social gender analysis method was the formulation that provides the rationale of“the sex equality”the law. the social sex analysis method plays the role to set up the fair law because we must conform to the law of development of society theory to make the instruction. The social sex that is introduced into legal science research area, legal regime's design will be more scientific reasonably, thus obtains the positive social effect and has the vital practical significance: First,it is helpful in the widespread international law cultural exchange and the mutual cooperation, thus causes the relation between national to be day by day close. The sex analysis method is one method which many national laws adopt, for the perfect the country law, many countries use foreign advanced law or the reasonable legal regime for reference to compete themselves, with absorption they fuse mutually with various countries law as well as international trail connection. Second, it is helpful in protecting a woman legitimate rights and interests not to eliminate. The social sex analysis method that pursues the equal value idea track the benefit which is closely related with woman to integrate the legal. Third, social sex analysis method is also helpful to inspires us to pay great attention to reality to implement the effect when the inspection equality legal relationship needs, and inspects the modern law the justice and the equal value demand and the actual content.
Present“Marriage law”stipulated the aspect to realize the equality of the sexes to make the outstanding contribution in the husbands and wives property system, strengthened the rationality and maneuverability, it fully considered since China has implemented the market economy, along with the national law to private economy's support, a husbands and wives side or both sides are engaged in production and operating activities brings husbands and wives property quantity and property scope change the husbands and wives property quantity which and the property scope change, as well as the equality of the sexes principle of legality carries out many years later, husbands and wives individual right consciousness awakening. It has further manifested humanism, made widely known the humanities concern spirit, strengthened specially in person's weak trend protection to the human. However, since the reform and open policy the husbands and wives property relations have tended to be complex, we regrettably saw that the legislator only pauses to the husbands and wives property system's revision in the lex lata pattern, but looking from the actual need of adjusts the husbands and wives property relations in the lex lata stipulation is far insufficient, mainly displays in the following several aspects: First, in the husbands and wives property legal regime the thorough solution housework value's question, the joint property rights of the real right occupation have not been able to be partitioned, woman's property right have not obtained the true practical protection. Second, the Supreme People's Court“Tries Divorce Case about the People's court To deal with Property Division Issue Certain Concrete Opinions”the 16th stipulation, namely“before the wedding personal property, in after marriage lives together damages, the consumption, to extinguish naturally loses, when divorce a side request redeems by the husbands and wives joint property, does not prepay holds.”, has neglected in the daily life custom, caused woman's before the wedding property rights not to receive legal the protection. Third, our husbands and wives property system's overall construction is incomplete, it only has stipulated under the usual condition legal property system, but does not have under the corresponding establishment random legal property system to adapts under the difficulty market economy condition in which the husbands and wives complex property relations need day by day. Fourth, the Supreme People's Court“Tries Divorce Case about the People's court To deal with Property Division Issue Certain Concrete Opinions”the 15th stipulation, namely:“when divorce a side not yet obtains the economic interest the intellectual property rights, the normalizing side possesses. When divides the husbands and wives joint property, may act according to the special details, gives the suitable attendance to a side.”, facing the intellectual property rights that will have the great wealth which in the future the possibility will bring, only support the side to give“to give appropriate consideration to”, rather will obviously lose fairly. This is actually to marital another side (often is the bride's side) housework value eliminating, which is mostly unfair to the female. Moreover, present“Marriage law”did not stipulate explicitly to non visible property's diploma, the qualifications and so on that has the imaginary profit legal right.
If a husbands or wives side (often is husband) carries on the development with the husbands and wives joint property majority, to pursue advanced studies, also treats makes a name for oneself when proposes the divorce, then defers to the present legal rule, weak one's right cannot obtain the guarantee.
The present husbands and wives property system did not have the mature social sex idea, and the reasons are: First, the Chinese feudalism tradition“the treatment of women as inferiors”for several thousand year causes present husbands and wives property system to lack the social sex analysis in our country is the historical reason. The Chinese women shoulder the feudal morals the shackles without independent personality causes them to lose takes the person proper value. Second, in the Chinese society man's average income is higher than the woman, this is the realistic reason that generally causes in our country present husbands and wives property system to lack the social sex analysis. The same labor different reward, the female will receive lower than the male, income high home capacity corresponding high somewhat, this also will cause female's not to be high in family status, and the law also not to consider the male and female both sexes different society experience and the actual status fully.
Because of lacking the social sex the angle of view, we pay attention insufficiently to the social reality in male and female both sexes in society's division of labor, the resources hold, specially is approved by the society aspects and so on. The law must take person's basic right as the starting point, the introspection tradition social sex, urges the man and the woman comprehensive healthy development, ends between the men and women not to be equal, realizes the social sex equality. But the equality we formerly pursued is take the male as a goal, stressed that the woman and the man makes the same labor intensity the work, it caused values and so on female's in family free work like birth, housework to neglect finally. Moreover, even if the woman is engaged in similar work with the male, they also do not have to realize the equal pay for equal work completely as well as to obtain same is promoted the opportunity. Therefore the equal insufficiency which has the necessity made up with the social sex equality in the legal formulation initiates. So the social sex analysis method request bases on the social reality, understood fully the woman is truly receives the discrimination as a result of the sex reason, the attention law on the identical thing to the female and the masculine different influence. Regarding the husbands and wives property system's legislation, must embark truthfully the archery target equality, makes a meticulousness, attains the benefit balance complete system between the husbands and wives a weak trend side (mostly is particularly the bride's side), therefore, the author believed that we should consummate from the following several aspects: First, acknowledged that the housework the value, supplements about the housework value stipulation. About the divorce time housework compensation, cancels in the lex lata to request the husband and wife to agree implements the distinction property system the limit. Second, increases stipulated that between the husbands and wives personal property and the husbands and wives joint property's compensation request power, safeguards the husbands and wives property benefit the equality, prevents a side to live together take the marriage as the excuse corrodes another side property rights and interests the behavior. Third, profiting from the overseas legislation to experience and to unify our country's actual situation, we should set up the property system to protect the personal property rights and interests not to receive the harm when the husbands and wives property present relations change. Fourth, the intellectual property rights obtained during marriage ties lasting period should be considered by the family whole investment receiving in exchange for individual right, its income must belong to the husband and wife together all, this income including already the power and the anticipation power. It prevents a husbands and wives side to propose the divorce after the husbands and wives other source's manpower, the physical resource serves, eliminates other source to live together in disguised form to the marriage“the investment”and the imaginary profit. Moreover, a husbands and wives side obtains the diploma and so on, must belong to the achievement which the husbands and wives unite efforts together, the regarding benefit which therefore produces, should take the husbands and wives joint property including the imaginary profit, includes the husbands and wives joint property the scope.
引文
[1] 王政:《社会性别与中国现代性——王政博士 12 月 9 日在复旦大学的讲演(节选)》,http://www.fda.fudan.edu.cn/fdahome/mrlt/13.htm,2008年4 月8 日。
[2] 参见沈宗灵:《现代西方法理学》,北京大学出版社 1992 年第 1版,第 297 页。
[3] 参见周安平:《性别与法律——性别平等的法律进路》,法律出版社 2007 年第 1 版,第 28 页。
[4] [美]凯特·斯丹德利:《家庭法》,屈广清译,中国政法大学出版社 2004 年第 1 版,第 20 页。
[5] 参见林秀雄:《夫妻财产制度之研究》,中国政法大学出版社 2001年第 1 版,第 33 页。
[6] 参见蒋永萍主编:《世纪之交的中国妇女社会地位》,当代中国出版社 2003 年第 1 版,第 28-29 页。
[7] 夏吟兰:《离婚救济制度之实证研究》,《政法论坛》2003 年第 6 期,第 150 页。
[8] 吴汉东:《财产权客体制度论——以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象》,《法商研究》2000 年第 4 期,第 55 页。
[9] 参见马俊驹、梅夏英:《无形财产的理论和立法问题》,《中国法学》2001 年第 2 期,第 104 页。
[10] 周安平:《性别与法律——性别平等的法律进路》,法律出版社 2007年第 1 版,第 43 页。
[11] 张虚白:《女子财产继承权详解》,上海法政学社 1930 年第 1 版,第 6-12 页。
[12] 谭琳、姜秀花主编:《社会性别平等与法律研究和对策》,社会科学文献出版社 2007 年第 1 版,第 2 页。
[13] 王新宇:《民国时期婚姻法近代化研究》,中国法制出版社 2006 年第 1 版,第 232 页
[14] 参见鲍晓兰主编:《西方女性主义研究评价》,生活·读书·新知三联书店 1995 年第 1 版,第 2-5 页。
[15] 参见全国妇联、国家统计局:《第二期中国妇女社会地位抽样调查主要数据报告》2001 年 9 月,北京。
[16] 参见林秀雄:《夫妻财产制度之研究》,中国政法大学出版社 2001年第 1 版,第 147-155 页。
[17] 转引自夏吟兰:《对中国夫妻共同财产范围的社会性别分析》,《法学杂志》2005 年第 2 期,第 71 页。
[18] 参见陈苇:《完善我国夫妻财产制的立法构想》,《中国法学》2000年第 1 期,第 89 页。
[19] 参见龙翼飞、夏吟兰主编:《和谐社会中婚姻家庭关系的法律重构》,中国政法大学出版 2007 年第 1 版,第 173 页。
[20] 参见陈苇:《中国婚姻家庭法立法研究》,群众出版社 2000 年第1 版,第 215-217 页。
[21] 参见张莉:《关于婚姻法修正案夫妻财产立法的若干问题评析》,《福建师范大学学报》2001 年第 2 期,第 38 页。
[22] 参见陈苇:《婚内所得知识产权的财产期待权之归属探讨》,《现代法学》2000 年第 4 期,第 110 页。
[23] 参见蒋月:《夫妻财产纠纷的热点和难点》,《法学》2001 年第 2 期,第 47 页。
[24] 参见李进之等:《美国财产法》,法律出版社 1999 年第 1 版,第 88-89页。
1. 周安平:《社会性别与法学研究》,《妇女研究论丛》2006 年第 5期。
2. 李洪祥:《论离婚经济补偿制度的重构》,《当代法学》2005 年第 6期。
3. 林红:《试析性别理论的核心思想及其学术价值 --从性别概念的形成谈起》,《福建论坛(人文社会科学版)》2004 年第 1 期。
4. 陈苇、冉启玉:《公共政策中的社会性别——《婚姻法》的社会性别分析及其立法完善》,《甘肃政法学院学报》第 2005 年第 1 期。
5. 夏吟兰:《对中国夫妻共同财产范围的社会性别分析》,《法学杂志》2005 年第 2 期。
6. 陈苇:《完善我国夫妻财产制的立法构想》,《中国法学》2000 年第 1 期。
7. 张莉:《关于婚姻法修正案夫妻财产立法的若干问题评析》,《福建师范大学学报》2001 年第 2 期。
8. 陈苇:《婚内所得知识产权的财产期待权之归属探讨》,《现代法学》2000 年第 4 期。
9. 马俊驹、梅夏英:《无形财产的理论和立法问题》,《中国法学》2001 年第 2 期。
10. 夏吟兰:《离婚救济制度之实证研究》,《政法论坛》2003 年第 6 期。
11. 吴汉东:《财产权客体制度论——以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象》,《法商研究》2000 年第 4 期。
12. 薛宁兰:《法定夫妻财产制立法模式与类型选择》,《法学杂志》2005 年第 2 期。
13. 陈苇:《现代夫妻财产制的立法原则与若干问题研究》,《东南学术》2001 年第 2 期。
1. 沈宗灵:《现代西方法理学》,北京大学出版社 1992 年第 1 版。
2. 陈苇:《中国婚姻家庭法立法研究》,群众出版社 2000 年第 1 版。
3. 陈苇:《家事法研究》,群众出版社 2006 年第 1 版。
4. 龙翼飞、夏吟兰:《和谐社会中婚姻家庭关系的法律重构》,中国政法大学出版社 2007 年第 1 版。
5. 巫昌祯主编:《婚姻法执行状况调查》,中央文献出版社 2004 年第 1版。
6. 张希坡:《中国婚姻立法史》,人民出版社 2004 年第 1 版。
7. 王歌雅:《中国现代婚姻家庭立法研究》,黑龙江人民出版社 2004年第 1 版。
8. 蒋月:《夫妻财产纠纷的热点和难点》,厦门出版社 2001 年第 1 版。
9. 杨大文主编:《婚姻家庭法》,人民大学出版社 2006 年第 3 版。
10. 梁慧星主编:《中国民法典草案建议稿》,法律出版社2003 年第1 版。
11. 张虚白:《女子财产继承权详解》,上海法政学社 1930 年第 1 版。
12. 于静:《比较家庭法》,人民出版社 2006 年第 1 版。
13. 鲍晓兰主编:《西方女性主义研究评价》,生活·读书·新知三联书店 1995 年第 1 版。
14. 谭琳、陈卫民:《女性与家庭》,天津人民出版社 2001 年第 1 版。
15. 林秀雄:《夫妻财产制度之研究》,中国政法大学出版社 2001 年第 1版。
16. 蒋永萍主编:《世纪之交的中国妇女地位》,当代中国出版社 2003年第 1 版。
17. 李进之等:《美国财产法》,法律出版社 1999 年第 1 版。
18. 史尚宽:《亲属法论》,中国政法大学出版社 2000 年第 1 版。
[2] 参见沈宗灵:《现代西方法理学》,北京大学出版社 1992 年第 1版,第 297 页。
[3] 参见周安平:《性别与法律——性别平等的法律进路》,法律出版社 2007 年第 1 版,第 28 页。
[4] [美]凯特·斯丹德利:《家庭法》,屈广清译,中国政法大学出版社 2004 年第 1 版,第 20 页。
[5] 参见林秀雄:《夫妻财产制度之研究》,中国政法大学出版社 2001年第 1 版,第 33 页。
[6] 参见蒋永萍主编:《世纪之交的中国妇女社会地位》,当代中国出版社 2003 年第 1 版,第 28-29 页。
[7] 夏吟兰:《离婚救济制度之实证研究》,《政法论坛》2003 年第 6 期,第 150 页。
[8] 吴汉东:《财产权客体制度论——以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象》,《法商研究》2000 年第 4 期,第 55 页。
[9] 参见马俊驹、梅夏英:《无形财产的理论和立法问题》,《中国法学》2001 年第 2 期,第 104 页。
[10] 周安平:《性别与法律——性别平等的法律进路》,法律出版社 2007年第 1 版,第 43 页。
[11] 张虚白:《女子财产继承权详解》,上海法政学社 1930 年第 1 版,第 6-12 页。
[12] 谭琳、姜秀花主编:《社会性别平等与法律研究和对策》,社会科学文献出版社 2007 年第 1 版,第 2 页。
[13] 王新宇:《民国时期婚姻法近代化研究》,中国法制出版社 2006 年第 1 版,第 232 页
[14] 参见鲍晓兰主编:《西方女性主义研究评价》,生活·读书·新知三联书店 1995 年第 1 版,第 2-5 页。
[15] 参见全国妇联、国家统计局:《第二期中国妇女社会地位抽样调查主要数据报告》2001 年 9 月,北京。
[16] 参见林秀雄:《夫妻财产制度之研究》,中国政法大学出版社 2001年第 1 版,第 147-155 页。
[17] 转引自夏吟兰:《对中国夫妻共同财产范围的社会性别分析》,《法学杂志》2005 年第 2 期,第 71 页。
[18] 参见陈苇:《完善我国夫妻财产制的立法构想》,《中国法学》2000年第 1 期,第 89 页。
[19] 参见龙翼飞、夏吟兰主编:《和谐社会中婚姻家庭关系的法律重构》,中国政法大学出版 2007 年第 1 版,第 173 页。
[20] 参见陈苇:《中国婚姻家庭法立法研究》,群众出版社 2000 年第1 版,第 215-217 页。
[21] 参见张莉:《关于婚姻法修正案夫妻财产立法的若干问题评析》,《福建师范大学学报》2001 年第 2 期,第 38 页。
[22] 参见陈苇:《婚内所得知识产权的财产期待权之归属探讨》,《现代法学》2000 年第 4 期,第 110 页。
[23] 参见蒋月:《夫妻财产纠纷的热点和难点》,《法学》2001 年第 2 期,第 47 页。
[24] 参见李进之等:《美国财产法》,法律出版社 1999 年第 1 版,第 88-89页。
1. 周安平:《社会性别与法学研究》,《妇女研究论丛》2006 年第 5期。
2. 李洪祥:《论离婚经济补偿制度的重构》,《当代法学》2005 年第 6期。
3. 林红:《试析性别理论的核心思想及其学术价值 --从性别概念的形成谈起》,《福建论坛(人文社会科学版)》2004 年第 1 期。
4. 陈苇、冉启玉:《公共政策中的社会性别——《婚姻法》的社会性别分析及其立法完善》,《甘肃政法学院学报》第 2005 年第 1 期。
5. 夏吟兰:《对中国夫妻共同财产范围的社会性别分析》,《法学杂志》2005 年第 2 期。
6. 陈苇:《完善我国夫妻财产制的立法构想》,《中国法学》2000 年第 1 期。
7. 张莉:《关于婚姻法修正案夫妻财产立法的若干问题评析》,《福建师范大学学报》2001 年第 2 期。
8. 陈苇:《婚内所得知识产权的财产期待权之归属探讨》,《现代法学》2000 年第 4 期。
9. 马俊驹、梅夏英:《无形财产的理论和立法问题》,《中国法学》2001 年第 2 期。
10. 夏吟兰:《离婚救济制度之实证研究》,《政法论坛》2003 年第 6 期。
11. 吴汉东:《财产权客体制度论——以无形财产权客体为主要研究对象》,《法商研究》2000 年第 4 期。
12. 薛宁兰:《法定夫妻财产制立法模式与类型选择》,《法学杂志》2005 年第 2 期。
13. 陈苇:《现代夫妻财产制的立法原则与若干问题研究》,《东南学术》2001 年第 2 期。
1. 沈宗灵:《现代西方法理学》,北京大学出版社 1992 年第 1 版。
2. 陈苇:《中国婚姻家庭法立法研究》,群众出版社 2000 年第 1 版。
3. 陈苇:《家事法研究》,群众出版社 2006 年第 1 版。
4. 龙翼飞、夏吟兰:《和谐社会中婚姻家庭关系的法律重构》,中国政法大学出版社 2007 年第 1 版。
5. 巫昌祯主编:《婚姻法执行状况调查》,中央文献出版社 2004 年第 1版。
6. 张希坡:《中国婚姻立法史》,人民出版社 2004 年第 1 版。
7. 王歌雅:《中国现代婚姻家庭立法研究》,黑龙江人民出版社 2004年第 1 版。
8. 蒋月:《夫妻财产纠纷的热点和难点》,厦门出版社 2001 年第 1 版。
9. 杨大文主编:《婚姻家庭法》,人民大学出版社 2006 年第 3 版。
10. 梁慧星主编:《中国民法典草案建议稿》,法律出版社2003 年第1 版。
11. 张虚白:《女子财产继承权详解》,上海法政学社 1930 年第 1 版。
12. 于静:《比较家庭法》,人民出版社 2006 年第 1 版。
13. 鲍晓兰主编:《西方女性主义研究评价》,生活·读书·新知三联书店 1995 年第 1 版。
14. 谭琳、陈卫民:《女性与家庭》,天津人民出版社 2001 年第 1 版。
15. 林秀雄:《夫妻财产制度之研究》,中国政法大学出版社 2001 年第 1版。
16. 蒋永萍主编:《世纪之交的中国妇女地位》,当代中国出版社 2003年第 1 版。
17. 李进之等:《美国财产法》,法律出版社 1999 年第 1 版。
18. 史尚宽:《亲属法论》,中国政法大学出版社 2000 年第 1 版。