用户名: 密码: 验证码:
HIV/AIDS/STI社区综合干预效果评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
背景世行贷款卫生九项目艾滋病性病预防控制子项目(H9-HIV/AIDS/STI)是我国第一个大规模综合性预防控制艾滋病性病项目。项目针对二十世纪八十年代末期我国异常严峻的艾滋病性病流行形势,以及防治工作面临的政策、资源、技术方法及社会文化观念等多方面的困难而设计,目的是建设艾滋病防治关键设施,在我国艾滋病流行形势较严重或流行危险因素较多的地区先行贯彻落实国家艾滋病防治规划、试点探索艾滋病防治政策与措施,进而以点带面推动全国的防治工作。项目在国家CDC以及新疆、广西、福建、山西四省(自治区)的32个地市和55个县实施。全部计划经费投入3999万美元,其中世界银行贷款占62.52%,国内配套占37.48%。项目于1999年11月份正式启动,于2008年6月30日结束,历经近9年的努力,全面覆盖项目所设计的机构与能力建设、政策倡导与社会动员、艾滋病性病监测、艾滋病性病干预、血液管理等领域。
     目的评价H9-HIV/AIDS/STI项目的目标实现程度、有效性以及影响因素,总结该项目的经验及教训。
     方法综合运用定性和定量研究方法。通过数据填报、数据索取、综合现场调查(定性访谈、多部门座谈、问卷调查与考核)等方法收集数据,采用描述性分析方法与比较分析方法(项目地区计划与执行情况比较、项目实施前后/趋势比较、项目县与非项目县比较),进行全面评估。
     结果H9支持了四个项目省中65%的省级政策及98%的项目县防治政策的开发与执行。这些政策包括地域性防治长期规划、政治承诺、社会动员、技术支持、大众健康教育、高危/脆弱人群健康干预、AIDS患者及HIV感染者救助、血液管理、STI临床综合诊疗流程管理、HIV监测、安全套发放。截至2007年末,H9共支持30个国家级HIV/AIDS/STI技术方案及指南的开发与普及。项目实施期间,四省共建设209个HIV监测哨点,其中H9筹建了其中147个哨点。调查项目地区大众HIV/AIDS/STI问题知晓率从2002年3.1%上升到2007年17.4%,明显高于非项目地区同期从0.8%到3.8%的上升速度;项目地区地方政府官员知识、行为得分高于非项目地区,知晓率分别为83.6%,81.1%,差异有显著性;项目地区临床医生HIV/AIDS/STI相关知识态度得分高于非项目地区同水平医生得分,并且在STI诊断和治疗知识得分上差异呈显著性;项目地区公众最近一次性行为安全套使用率从2002年的19.8%上升到2007的30.1%,上升速度及使用率均高于非项目地区同期的11.4%及25.6%;项目地区女性商业性服务者淋病、衣原体感染、梅毒、尖锐湿疣、生殖器疱疹患病率低于非项目地区(分别为15.1%及25%, P<0.001)。H9项目组建发展的专家团队为非项目地区提供了大量的技术支持,自2006年,项目地区的实施经验开始逐步向全国推广;项目地区与非项目地区之间管理与技术人员的频繁交流与调动,使得项目地区获得的经验、知识和技能迅速传播至非项目地区;通过项目实施,探索了一批卓有成效的干预模式,为以后的MSM、娱乐场所暗娼、静脉注射吸毒者和青年/学生等人群干预以及性病规范化管理等提供了有益的借鉴。
     结论H9-HIV/AIDS/STI作为我国第一个综合性STI/HIV社区干预项目,项目的总体目标及各领域主要目标基本实现,部分目标超过原先设计要求。项目在促进地区HIV政策研发与实施、政府领导层开发、HIV知识—行为—态度的改变、技术人员能力开发等方面发挥显著作用,同时,项目地区经济、文化、政策变迁等环境因素对项目实施效果也有极大的促进作用。H9-HIV/AIDS/STI项目终末评估分析认为良性管理和创造适宜文化背景是引入新项目的重要前提;整合的项目计划有利于推动价值观在社区成员内的共享;强有力的政策制订使计划方案更具有系统性和规范性;H9-HIV/AIDS/STI与政治承诺的交互作用是项目成功的另一个关键因素;系统、长期的人员培训及相关技能手册、指南的开发极大地提升了服务提供者STI/HIV相关知识技能,改善了服务水平;研究人员及服务机构之间的合作有利于推动地区实践与研究的结合,提高了循征决策水平;统一的资源配置机制在加强资源整合方面是非常必要的,根据HIV防控目标群体以及不同地区的流行情况进行资源的合理分配有利于避免地区资源分配的不平衡,保障项目的设计、实施与评估环节的完整性。
     评估还提示现阶段HIV/STI防控尚未在所有领域完全铺开。从卫生服务公平性角度出发,在农村以及低收入地区加大监管力度是HIV防控工作的重点;在卫生服务体系层面上,整合多方力量,充分发挥计生和妇幼等服务网络的优势开展防治工作是未来HIV防控工作的可行方案;从服务体系监测能力而言,中国HIV/AIDS监测水平近年来取得了长足的进步,但在基层实践层面,统一理解、运用并逐步健全常规化监测体系的流程设计是必要的;从干预重点及迫切性考虑,需要加大对项目资金使用效率的论证,开发面向不同风险人群的AIDS政策、干预服务内容以及相应的资源配置措施。
Backgrounds The HIV/AIDS/STI prevention and control subproject of the ninth health project funded by the World Bank Loan, H9-HIV/AIDS/STI, is the first large-scaled comprehensive project in combating HIV/STI epidemics in China. It was launched in response to the souring HIV/STI epidemics in China in the late 1980s. It was designed to build key facilities for HIV/STI prevention and control, promote earlier implementation of China’s First Ten Year HIV/AIDS Control Plan in areas hardest hid by or at the highest risk for HIV/STIs and explore effective policies and measures to inform nation-wide battle against the epidemics. The project was implemented in 35 prefectures and 55 counties in Xinjiang, Guangxi, Fujian, and Shanxi province or autonomous regions and China Central CDC. The project total budget was $39.99 million including $25.00million (62.52%) from World Bank Loan and $14.99 million (37.4%) counterpart fund from Chinese governments at different levels. The project was formally initiated in November, 1999 and ended in June, 2008.
     Objectives To evaluate the fulfillment of the planned project goals, effectiveness and impacts of the project implementation. To summarize the accomplished achievements and lessons learned.
     Methods We employed a combination of both qualitative and quantitative methods including record/document reviews, key informant qualitative interviews, focus group meetings, structured KAP surveys, knowledge examinations, case studies. Historical comparisons among different time points and case-control study between project and non-project counties were used.
     Results More than 65% policies in four provinces and 98% policies developed in project counties were supported by H9. These regional policies target long-term planning, political commitment, social mobilization, skill support, general population health education, high risk/vulnerable population intervention, aids for AIDS patients and HIV infectors, blood management, STI clinical comprehensive service management, HIV surveillance, condom spread. 209 HIV surveillant sentinels were established in four project provinces and among them, 146 were financed directly by H9. By the end of 2007, 30 national HIV/AIDS/STI technological formulations providing national guidelines were developed by H9.The rate of correct responses to HIV/AIDS/STI questions among the general public increased from 3.1% in 2002 to 17.4% in 2007 in project areas contrasted with 0.8% to 3.8% in non-project counties. Knowledge and behavior of local government officers are also better than non-project counties– the awareness rate of basic HIV knowledge in project counties is 83.6% versus 81.1% (P<0.05). Knowledge and attitude to HIV/AIDS/STIs among the clinical medical professionals in the project counties are better than those of the non-project counties with important and significant difference in STI diagnosis and treatment and clinical behavior intervention. Condom use (during the last sexual event) among the general population increased from 19.8% in 2002 to 30.1% in 2007contrasted with 11.4% to 25.6% in non project counties in the same period.The prevalence rate of Gonorrhea, Chlamydia infection, Syphilis, Verruca Acuminata and Herpes Genitals among female sexual workers in project counties was lower than that in the control counties (15.1% versus 25%, P<0.001) The expert team members developed in H9 began to provide extend technology and skill to the non-project regions. Some project regions with good intervention experiences were introduced nationally from 2006.
     Conclusions The overall goals of the project and the main objectives in each component have been realized with some areas even have surpassed the original design.The experience concluded and lessons learned provides a unique opportunity to explore the long term comprehensive STI/HIV intervention in a low-middle income country setting. Project plays a very important role in policy development and implementation, leadership development, HIV knowledge-behavior-attitude change, skill development. At the same time, the local economic, culture and policy transition promote and deepened the project implementation. The evaluation suggests that good governance and a conducive culture are important prerequisites for incorporating a new project within an existing system. Integrated project planning played an important role in shared value introduction and spread. Robust policy-making helps to systematize and institutionalize the planning mechanisms. The interactive effect of project and political commitment is another key factor that contributed to the success of project. Systematic management and technology staffs training promote the providers’skill and attitude. Active collaboration between researchers and service agencies results in successful program adoption. A unified resource allocation mechanism was efficient in strengthening resource linkage in fighting AIDS.
     The evaluation also suggests that the HIV/STI prevention and control does not extend to all the regions currently. Low income and rural area should be received high attention in the next stage concerning the equity of health intervention. Making full use of family planning and maternal and children health service net in HIV control is the practicable mechanism in future health service system strengthening. HIV/AIDS surveillance level was improved recently, unified understanding toward surveillance and unified flowing chart of the HIV surveillance is essential for the grass-root institution and staff. Developing the AIDS policies, intervention package and relevant resource distribution scheme targeting diversified HIV risk population will help to enhance the resource efficiency.
引文
1.卫生部贷款办世界银行贷款卫生九项目(性病艾滋病)计划书.(1999)
    2.石雷雨.卫生服务研究方法.北京大学医学出版社.2005.P193-195
    3. Framework for program evaluation in public health.http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4811a1.htm.(2009-10-10)
    4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005
    5. WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. Evaluation in health promotion—Principles and perspectives. http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E73455a.pdf (2009-11-16)
    6.陈大方.段明月.卫生项目评估方法.北京大学医学出版社.2009.6
    7. WHO. Guidelines for the clinical management of HIVinfection in adults. WHO/GPA/IDS/HCS/91.6Geneva 1991
    8. National Institutes of Heatlh. Study confirms that combination treatment using a protease inhibitor can delay HIV disease progression and death. Press realease, February 24,1997.
    9. UNAIDS. (2008).Financing the response to AIDS in low- and middle- income countries: International assistance from the G8, European Commission and the other donor Governments. http://data.unaids.org/pub/Presentation/2009/20090704_UNAIDS_KFF_G8_CHARTPACK_2009_en.pdf. (2009-11-16)
    10. Jourden, J., Etkind, P. (2004) Enhancing and STD prevention through program integration. Public Health Report. January-February, 119(1): 4-11
    11. Parkhurst, J.J., Lush, L. (2004) The political environment of HIV: lessons from a comparison of Uganda and South Africa. Social Science & Medicine. November;59(9):1913-24
    12. The World Bank. (2005) Committing to Results: Improving the Effectiveness of Assistance. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/11/21/000160016_20051121141740/Rendered/PDF/343250PAPER0Co101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf (2009-11-16)
    13. Eileen S. Complexity, cofactors, and the failure of AIDS policy in Africa. Journal of the international AIDS society 2009,12:12. http://www.jiasociety.org/content/pdf/1758-2652-12-12.pdf [available on July 28, 2009]
    14. O'Donnell L, Stueve A, Agronick G, Saving Sex for Later: an evaluation of a parent education intervention. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005 Dec;37(4):166-73
    15. Sieverding JA, Adler N, Witt S, Ellen J. The influence of parental monitoring on adolescent sexual initiation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Aug;159(8):724-9.
    16. Rose A, Koo HP, Bhaskar B, Anderson K, The influence of primary caregivers on the sexual behavior of early adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Aug;37(2):135-44.
    17. Sieving RE, Eisenberg ME, Pettingell S, Friends' influence on adolescents' first sexual intercourse. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Mar;38(1):13-9.
    18. Browning CR, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J.Neighborhood context and racial differences in early adolescent sexual activity. Demography. 2004 Nov;41(4):697-720.
    19. Barnett JE, Hurst CS. Abstinence education for rural youth: an evaluation of the Life's Walk Program. J Sch Health. 2003 Sep;73(7):264-8.
    20. Beyrer Chris, Varun Gauri, Denise Vaillancourt. Evaluation of the World Bank’s Assistance in Responding to the AIDS Epidemic: Brazil Case Study. Case Study for the OEC evaluation of the Bank’s HIV/AIDS assistance.Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank, Washington,D.C.2004
    21. Brown Jonathan, Didem Ayvalikili, Nadeem Mohammad. Turning Bureaucrats into Warriors: Preparing and Implementing Multi-sector HIV/AIDS programs in Africa. World Bank AIDS Campaign Team for Africa, Washington, D.C.2004
    22. Carvalho, Soniya, Gillian Perkins, Howard White. Social Funds: Assessing Effectiveness. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. 2002
    23.国家卫生部.《2001年中央预算内专项资金血站建设和血液管理责任承诺书》.2001.
    24.卫生部国外贷款办公室.《卫生九项目艾滋病性病部分中期评估报告》2004.
    25.卫生部国外贷款办公室.《暗娼人群性病患病率调查及干预效果评估报告》2008.5
    26.中华人民共和国卫生部,联合国艾滋病规划署,世界卫生组织。《2007年中国艾滋病疫情与防治工作进展》2007-11-28.
    27.国务院防治艾滋病工作委员会办公室、联合国中国艾滋病专题组《2004年中国艾滋病防治联合评估报告》2005-1-18
    28.王英.倪大新.2004-2007年中国法定报告性传播疾病流行病学特征分析.疾病监测.2008,23(8):481-484
    29.中华人民共和国卫生部,联合国艾滋病规划署,世界卫生组织《.2005年中国艾滋病疫情与防治工作进展》2006-01-24.
    30. World Health Organization.Regional Office for Western Pacific. National Center for STD and Leprosy Control Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Prevalence survey of sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers and truck driver in China. 2001. http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/47E53FE9-C011-4F08-BF98-7ACFE4E70344/0/PrevalenceSurveyofSTI_CHN_1999_2000.pdf.(2010-2-18)
    31. Desai VK, Kosambiya JK, Thakor HG, Umrigar DD, Khandwala BR, Bhuyan KK.Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and performance of STI syndromes against aetiological diagnosis, in female sex workers of red light area in Surat, India. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Apr;79(2):111-5
    32.房新志,沈大为.90年代梅毒在美国的流行和预防控制.国外医学社会医学分册, 1998, 15( 3) :109- 112.
    33. World Health Organization-Western Pacific Regional Office. Antenatal Clinic STI Survey. http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/31F4B939-F764-45E1-BEA9-C28DB1B567A4/0/AntenatalClinicSTISurvey_SMA_2000.pdf. (2010-2-18)
    34. Tucker JD, Yang LG, Zhu ZJ, Yang B, Yin YP, Cohen MS, Chen XS. Integrated syphilis/HIV screening in China: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 7;10:58
    35. MacLachlan EW, Baganizi E, Bougoudogo F, Castle S, Mint-Youbba Z, Gorbach P, Parker K, Ryan CA. The feasibility of integrated STI prevalence and behaviour surveys in developing countries. Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Jun;78(3):187-9
    36. Castro KG, Lieb S, Jaffe HW, et al. Transmission of HIV in Belle Glade, Florida: lessons for other communities in the United States.Science 1988; 239:193–197.
    37. Organista KC, Balls Organista P. Migrant laborers and AIDS in the United States: a review of the literature. AIDS Educ Prev 1997;9:83–93.
    38. National CDC.STD Surveillance Reports 1993–2008. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/(2010-3-20)
    39. National CDC.STD Data Management & Information Technology.http://www.cdc.gov/std/Program/data-mgmt.htm.(2010-3-20)
    40. Aral SO. Sexually transmitted diseases: magnitude, determinants and consequences. Int J STD AIDS 2001;
    12:211–215.
    41. WHO.Guidelines for the Impelmentation of STI prevalence surveys. 1999.
    42. William Wong, John A. Tambis, Maria.Hernandez,Janice Chaw,Jeffrey Klausner.Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among Latino Immigrant Day Laborers in an Urban Setting—San Francisco.Sexual Transmitted Diseases. 2003(8):661-663.
    43. WHO.Sexual transmitted infections—Infections and Transmission. 2007. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/.(2010-4-6)
    44.中国疾病预防控制中心性病控制中心.2006年全国梅毒与淋病疫情分析报告.http://www.ncstdc.org/yqjc-detail/epidemiology/epidemiology_006.pdf.(2010-4-16)
    45.中国疾病预防控制中心性病控制中心.2006年全国梅毒与淋病疫情分析报告.http://www.ncstdc.org/yqjc-detail/epidemiology/epidemiology_006.pdf(2010-4-16)
    46.高省,Charles Lin.中国梅毒流行状况—血清流行病学系统综述. http://www.ncstdc.org/yqjc-detail/epidemiology/epidemiology_001.pdf(2010-4-16)
    47. Malta M, Bastos FI, Strathdee SA, Cunnigham SD, Pilotto JH, Kerrigan D. Knowledge, perceived stigma, and care-seeking experiences for sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative study from the perspective of public clinic attendees in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2007 Feb 1;7:18.
    48. Sangani P, Rutherford G, Wilkinson D. Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):1220
    49. Goetz MB, Hoang T, Henry SR, Knapp H, Anaya HD, Gifford AL, Asch SM; QUERI-HIV/Hepatitis Program. Evaluation of the sustainability of an intervention to increase HIV testing. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Dec;24(12):1275-80. Epub 2009 Oct 2。
    50. Eshel A, Moore A, Mishra M, Wooster J, Toledo C, Uhl G, Agüero LW. Community stakeholders' perspectives on the impact of the minority AIDS initiative in strengthening HIV prevention capacity in four communities. Ethn Health. 2008 Jan;13(1):39-54.
    51. Roura M, Busza J, Wringe A, Mbata D, Urassa M, Zaba B. Barriers to sustaining antiretroviral treatment in Kisesa, Tanzania: a follow-up study to understand attrition from the antiretroviral program.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009 Mar;23(3):203-10
    52. Israr, S.M., Islam, A. (2006) Good governance and sustainability: a case study from Pakistan. International Jounal of Health Planning & Manage. 21 October-December, 4: 313-25.
    53. Ettelt, S., Nolte, E., Thomson, S., Mays, N., International Healthcare Comparison Network. (2008) Policy Brief-- Capacity planning in health care. A review of the international experience.http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E91193.pdf. (2009-7-4)
    54. Schensul, S.L., Saggurti, N., Singh, R., Verma, R.K., Nastasi, B.K., Mazumder, P.G. Multilevel perspectives on community intervention: an example from an Indo-US HIV prevention project in Mumbai, India. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2009,June 43(3-4):277-91.
    55. Xue, B. HIV/AIDS policy and policy evolution in China. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 2005,July, 16(7):459-64
    56. Wu, Z., Rou, K., Cui, H. (2004) The HIV/AIDS epidemic in China: history, current strategies and future challenges. AIDS Education and Prevention. June, 16 (3 Suppl A):7-17
    57. Sheth, L., Operario, D., Latham, N., Sheoran, B. National-level capacity-building assistance model to enhance HIV prevention for Asian & Pacific Islander communities. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, January, 2007,Suppl:S40-8.
    58. Anh Ngo, Sheryla, Mccurdy, Michael Ross, Christine Markham, Eric Ratliff. The lives of female sex workers in Vietnam:Finding from a qualitative study.Culture, Health & Sexuality.2007,Nov-Dec.9(6):555-570.
    59. Takahashi, L.M., Candelario, J., Young, T., Mediano, E. Building capacity for HIV/AIDS prevention among Asian Pacific Islander organizations: the experience of a culturally appropriate capacity-building program in Southern California. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice. January, 2007, Suppl:S55-63
    60. Kelly, J.A., Somlai, A.M., DiFranceisco, W.J., Otto-Salaj, L.L., McAuliffe, T.L., Hackl, K.L., Hechman, T.G., Holtgrave, D.R., Rompa, D. Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: transferring effective research-based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. American Journal of Public Health.2000,July, 90(7):1082-8
    61. Walley, J., Khan, M.A., Shah, S.K., Witter, S., Wei, X. How to get research into practice: first get practice into research. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2007,85(6):424-25
    62. Lasker, R.D., Weuss, E.S. Broadening participation in communicty problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative parctice and research. Journal of Urban Health. 2003,March, 80(1):14-47
    63. Umble, K., Steffen, D., Porter, J., Miller, D., Hummer-McLaughlin, K., Lowman, A., Zelt, S. The national public health leadership institute: evaluation of a team-based approach to developing collaborative public health leaders. American Journal of Public Health, April, 2005,95(4):641-644.
    64. International HIV/AIDS Alliance. (2003) Key indicators for Frontiers Prevention Project: Report on baseline study in Andhra Pradesh, India. http://www.aidsalliance.org/graphics/secretariat/publications/FPP_Baseline_Report_India.pdf (2009-7-28)
    65.周月姣,刘伟,董柏青,梁绍伶,李晓铭,方晓义,赵然,黄冬梅,陆伟江,陈锦华,郭宁贞.某乡镇暗娼艾滋病知识、态度、安全套使用与STD感染调查分析.中华疾病控制杂志.2007,11(5):488-490. 
    66. UNAIDS.(2008)What countries need investment needed for 2010 targets. http://data.unaids.org/pub/Report/2009/JC1681_what_countries_need_en.pdf. (last accessed 12 November 2009)
    67. Wang, D.B., Zhang, X.J., Zhang, H.B., Zhang, C.Y., Su, B. A rapid assessment of community-wide HIV/STI intervention in China. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2005,February 81(1):47-52
    68. Stover, J., Walker, N., Garnett, G.P., Salomon, J.A., Stanecki, K.A., Ghys, P.D., Grassly, N.C., Anderson, R.M., Schwartlander, B. Can We Reverse the HIV/AIDS Pandemic with an Expanded Response? Lancet, 2002,July, 360(9362):73–77.
    69. WHO. Integrating sexual health services in Swaziland. http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/11/09-011109.pdf. 2008 (2010-4-6)
    70. WHO. The work of WHO in the Western Pacific Region 2008-2009. http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/38C407F6-966D-4BB5-97EB-76DD7E494E9A/0/RD09_1_DCC_HSI.pdf.(2010-4-6) 
    71.秦侠,胡志,陈任,汤质如,李洁雪,马颖.我国艾滋病防治主要督导与评估工作的描述性分析.中华疾病控制杂志.2008,12(6):519-522.
    72. Chandrasekaran, P., Dallabetta, G., Loo, V., Mills, S., Saidel, T., Adhikary, R., Alary, M., Lowndes, C..M., Boily, M.C., Moore, J., Avahan Evaluation Partners. Evaluation design for large-scale HIV prevention programmes: the case of Avahan, the India AIDS initiative. AIDS. 2008,Dec;22 Supple 5:S1-15
    73. International HIV/AIDS Alliance. Frontiers Prevention Project evaluation. http://www.aidsalliance.org/sw10904.asp (2009-7-28)
    74. International HIV/AIDS Alliance. (2003) Participatory site assessments in Cambodia, Ecuador and Andhra Pradesh State in India. http://www.aidsalliance.org/graphics/secretariat/publications/psa0803_participatory_site_assessment.pdf ((2009-7-28)
    75. The center for HIV prevention& care. (2009) Project ReConnect Tool Kit. http://www.sonoma-county.org/health/ph/hiv/reconnecttoolkit09.htm. (2009-4-8)
    76. Pawson, R., Tilley, N. (1997) Realist Evaluation. http://www.dprn.nl/uploads/thematic_meetings/Realistic%20Evaluation.pdf. (2008-8-24)
    77. The World Bank. (2005) Committing to Results: Improving the Effectiveness of HIV/AIDS Assistance. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/11/21/000160016_20051121141740/Rendered/PDF/343250PAPER0Co101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf (2009-3-16)
    78. Biesma RG, Brugha R, Harmer A, Walsh A, Spicer N, Walt G. The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control. Health Policy Plan. 2009 Jul;24(4):239-52. Epub 2009 Jun 2. Review
    79. Dredger, S.M., Kothari, A., Morrison, J., Sawada, M., Crighton, E.J., Graham, I.D. Using participatory design to develop (public) health decision support systems through GIS. Internation Journal of Health Geographics.2007,(11) 6:53
    80. Stillwaggon, E. Complexity, cofactors, and the failure of AIDS policy in Africa. Journal of the international AIDS society, 2009,10 July,12(1):12. http://www.jiasociety.org/content/pdf/1758-2652-12-12.pdf (2009-7-28)
    81. Norton WE, Amico KR, Cornman DH, Fisher WA, Fisher JD. An agenda for advancing the science of implementation of evidence-based HIV prevention interventions.AIDS Behav. 2009 Jun;13(3):424-9. Epub 2009 Apr 10
    82. Sun X, Wang N, Li D, Zheng X, Qu S, Wang L, Lu F, Poundstone K, Wang L. The development of HIV/AIDS surveillance in China. AIDS. 2007 Dec;21 Suppl 8:S33-8
    83. Zhou, Y.R. Help-seeking in a context of AIDS stigma: understanding the healthcare needs of people with HIV/AIDS in China. Health Social Care Community. 2009,March, 17(2):202-8
    84. Solomon, N.M. Health information generation and utilization for informed decision-making in equitable health service management: The case of Kenya partnership for health program. International Journal for Equity in Health , 2005,24 June,4:8
    85. WHO. Design and implementation of health information. http://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?sesslan=1&codlan=1&codcol=15&codcch=479. (2008-12-22).
    86. WHO.(2009). Reducing health inequities through action on the social determinants of health. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/A62/A62_R14-en.pdf (2009-11-12)
    87. Bauermeister JA, Tross S, Ehrhardt AA. A review of HIV/AIDS system-level interventions. AIDS Behav. 2009 Jun;13(3):430-48. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
    88. Parkhurst, J.J., Lush, L. The political environment of HIV: lessons from a comparison of Uganda and South Africa. Social Science & Medicine. 2004, November;59(9):1913-24
    89. Jourden, J., Etkind, P. Enhancing HIV/AIDS and STD prevention through program integration. Public Health Report. 2004, January-February, 119(1): 4-11
    90. Hogan, D.R., Baltussen, R., Hayashi, C., Lauer, J.A., Salomon, J.A. Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Strategies to Combat HIV/AIDS in Developing Countries. BMJ, 2005,December, 331(7530):1431-1437.doi:10.1136/bmj.38643.368692.68.(2009-12-15)
    91. Birkhead GS, Klein SJ, Candelas AR, O'Connell DA, Rothman JR, Feldman IS, Tsui DS, Cotroneo RA, Flanigan CA. Integrating multiple programme and policy approaches to hepatitis C prevention and care for injection drug users: a comprehensive approach. Int J Drug Policy. 2007 Oct;18(5):417-25. Epub 2007 Feb 20. Review
    1.陈坤.农村公共卫生调查.科学出版社.2008.P.58
    2. Framework for program evaluation in public health.http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4811a1.htm.(2009-10-10)
    3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005.
    4. WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. Evaluation in health promotion—Principles and perspectives. http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E73455a.pdf (2009-11-16)
    5.石雷雨.卫生服务研究方法.北京大学医学出版社.2005.P193-195
    6.卓越.公共部门绩效评估.中国人民大学出版社.P14-15
    7. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Program evaluation standards: how to assess evaluations of educational programs. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
    8. Cook TD, Reichardt CS,. Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Sage research progress series in evaluation, vol 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1979.
    9. Green JC, Caracelli V, eds. Advances in mixed-method evaluation: the challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Directions for Program Evaluation, vol 74; San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1997.
    10. Frechtling J, Sharp L. User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 1997.
    11. WHO.Reducing health inequities through action on the social determinants of health.http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/A62/A62_R14-en.pdf (2009-12-12)
    12. Lichiello P ,Turning Point Collaborating for a New Century in Public Health: Guidebook for Performance Measurement . Turning Point National Program Office at the University of Washington. December 1999
    13. CDC.Framework for program evaluation in public health.http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4811a1.htm. (2010-2-12.)
    14. New players for a new era: leading health promotion into the 21st century:4th International Conference on Health Promotion, Jakarta, Indonesia, 21-25 July 1997.Geneva, World Health Organization, 1998.
    15. Health promotion evaluation: recommendations to policy-makers: report of the WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1998.
    16. Springett,J. Practical guidance on evaluating health promotion: guidelines for practitioners. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1999.
    17. WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. Evaluation in health promotion—Principles and perspectives. http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E73455a.pdf (2010-2-5)
    18. US Department of Health and Human Services. Introduction to program evaluation forcomprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health, November 2001
    19. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity evaluation handbook. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002
    20. Center for Advancement of Community Based Public Health. An evaluation framework for community health programs. Durham, NC: Center for Advancement of Community Based Public Health, June 2000.
    21. McLean RM, Hoek JA, Buckley S, Croxson B, Cumming J, Ehau TH, Tanuvasa AF, Johnston M, Mann JI, Schofield G."Healthy Eating - Healthy Action": evaluating New Zealand's obesity prevention strategy. BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 6;9:452
    22. Draper CE, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Lambert EV.A retrospective evaluation of a community-based physical activity health promotion program. Phys Act Health. 2009 Sep;6(5):578-88
    23. Cutler TW, Palmieri J, Khalsa M, Stebbins M.Evaluation of the relationship between a chronic disease care management program and california pay-for-performance diabetes care cholesterol measures in one medical group. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Sep;13(7):578-88
    24. De Bock F, Fischer JE, Hoffmann K, Renz-Polster H.A participatory parent-focused intervention promoting physical activity in preschools: design of a cluster-randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 31;10(1):49.
    25. Hirsch JD, Rosenquist A, Best BM, Miller TA, Gilmer TP. Evaluation of the first year of a pilot program in community pharmacy: HIV/AIDS medication therapy management for Medi-Cal beneficiaries. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):32-41
    26. Plotnikoff RC, Courneya KS, Sigal RJ, Johnson JA, Birkett N, Lau D, Raine K, Johnson ST, Karunamuni N. Alberta Diabetes and Physical Activity Trial (ADAPT): A randomized theory-based efficacy trial for adults with type 2 diabetes - rationale, design, recruitment, evaluation, and dissemination. Trials. 2010 Jan 12;11(1):4
    27. Christopher Garimor Orach, Dominique Dubourg, Vincent De Brouwere. Costs and coverage of reproductive health interventions in three rural refugee-affected districts, Uganda. Tropical Medicine and International Health Volume 12 No.3 pp459-469.March 2007.
    28. Fox D, Ried LD, Klein GE, Myers W, Foli K.A medication therapy management program's impact on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in Medicare Part D patients with diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;49(2):192-9
    29. Jane Springett . Appropriate approaches to the evaluation of health promotion.Critical Public Health, 1469-3682, Volume 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 139– 151
    30. Walley, J., Khan, M.A., Shah, S.K., Witter, S., Wei, X. How to get research into practice: first get practice into research. Bulletin of the World Health Organization,.2007,85(6):424-25
    31. Keats MR, Culos-Reed N.A theory-driven approach to encourage physical activity in pediatric cancer survivors: a pilot study.J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009 Apr;31(2):267-83.
    32. Pinto BM, Floyd A.Theories underlying health promotion interventions among cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008 Aug;24(3):153-63.
    33. Ryan P.Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change: background and intervention development. Clin Nurse Spec. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):161-70; quiz 171-2.
    34. Rockwell, K.Bennett, C.Targeting outcomes of programs:A hierarchy for targeting outcomes and evaluating their achievement. Faculty publications: Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication Department.http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/aglecfacpub/48/.
    35. Pawson, R., Tilley, N. (1997) Realist Evaluation. http://www.dprn.nl/uploads/thematic_meetings/Realistic%20Evaluation.pdf.(2009-10-15)
    36. Scott-Samuel A, O'Keefe E. Health impact assessment, human rights and global public policy: a critical appraisal. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Mar;85(3):212-7
    37. Wagemakers A, Vaandrager L, Koelen MA, Saan H, Leeuwis C. Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health. Eval Program Plann. 2010 Jan 11.
    38. Pommier J, Guevel MR, Jourdan D. Evaluation of health promotion in schools: a realistic evaluation approach using mixed methods. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 28;10(1):43
    39. McGrath BB, Ka'ili TO. Creating Project Talanoa: a culturally based community healthprogram for U.S. Pacific Islander adolescents. Public Health Nurs. 2010 Jan-Feb;27(1):17-24.
    40. Mohajer N, Bessarab D, Earnest J. There should be more help out here! A qualitative study of the needs of Aboriginal adolescents in rural Australia. Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1137.
    41. Wise M, Harris P, Harris-Roxas B, Harris E.The role of health impact assessment in promoting population health and health equity. Health Promot J Austr. 2009 Dec;20(3):172-9.
    42. Dunet DO, Sparling PB, Hersey J, Williams-Piehota P, Hill MD, Hanssen C, Lawrenz F, Reyes M. A new evaluation tool to obtain practice-based evidence of worksite health promotion programs. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Oct;5(4):A118
    43. Grossmeier J, Terry PE, Cipriotti A, Burtaine JE. Best practices in evaluating worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(3):1-9
    44. Healthy Youth. A Self-Assessment and Planning Guide. https://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/SHI/Default.aspx.(2010-2-19)
    45. Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, Bassett M, Rehkopf DH, Miller C; HIA "promise and pitfalls" conference group. Assessing health impact assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Sep;57(9):659-62
    46. Mwifadhi MRISHO, Joanna A. Schellenberg, Adiel K. Mushi, Brigit Obrist, Hassan Mshinda, Marcel Tanner, David Schellenberg. Factor affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania. Tropical Medicine and International Health.Volume 12 NoPP. 862-872 July .2007,
    47. Mark Hayter.Reaching marginalized young people through sexual health nursing outreach clinics: Evaluating service use and the views of service users. Public Health Nursing Vol.22 No.4,pp.339-346.2005
    48. Miranda Mugford, Guy Hutton, Julia Fox-Rushby. Methods for economic evaluation alongside a multicentre trial in developing countries: a case study from the WHO Antenatal Care Randomised Controlled Trial. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 1998,12,Suppl.2,75-97.
    49. Fox D, Ried LD, Klein GE, Myers W, Foli K.A medication therapy management program's impact on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in Medicare Part D patients with diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Mar-Apr;49(2):192-9
    50. Pigeot I, De Henauw S, Foraita R, Jahn I, Ahrens W. Primary prevention from the epidemiology perspective: Three examples from the practice. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Feb 3;10(1):10
    51.段明月,计虹.卫生项目评估的有关问题研究.中国卫生经济,2000 ;19 (4) :33~351)
    52.江芹,胡善联.公共卫生体系绩效评估的概念性框架.中国卫生事业管理.2004(5):260-263
    53.应向华,曹建文,陈洁,陈英耀.卫生技术评估的基本步骤.中国卫生资源2005,8(1):37-40
    54.程晋烽.西方公共卫生评估的演化逻辑及其启示.卫生软科学.2007,21(3):192-196
    55.方鹏骞,祝敬萍.第三方评估在卫生项目评估中的作用与角色.中国卫生事业管理.2007(10):657-658
    56.卢宪中,陈文,应晓华.条件价值评估法在卫生经济学研究中的应用.中国卫生经济2005,24(11):58-60.
    57.阎正民.卫生项目评价中的定性方法.预防医学情报杂志,2003 ;19 (3) :287~2891.
    58.张翔,张亮,张洁欣,刘会田,鲁新.农村弱势人群卫生服务需求现状及影响因素的社会学评估.中国卫生事业管理.2004(7):425-426
    59.孙建国,周巍,钮文异.电话访问在社区健康教育快速评估项目中的应用分析.中国全科医学2005,(8):906-907)
    60.陈大方,段明月.卫生项目评估方法.北京大学医学出版社.2009.6
    61.刘运国,黄健.卫生人员培训管理指导手册.北京:中国财经出版社.2006.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700