甘蔗施用“旱地龙”效应研究
摘要
本试验分别采用两个方案四个试验来研究在甘蔗分蘖初期和伸长初期喷施“旱地龙”对甘蔗效应的影响。两个方案均在甘蔗分蘖初期、伸长初期喷施不同浓度即0g/L、2g/L、4g/L、6g/L的“旱地龙”。第一方案为新植蔗桶栽干旱胁迫试验,主要测定与抗旱有关的生理指标;第二方案为大田宿根正常栽培试验,主要测定其农艺性状、生理指标、叶片氮、磷、钾含量、甘蔗产量性状和品质分析。主要试验结果如下:
1、喷施“旱地龙”对甘蔗抗旱性的影响。
在甘蔗分蘖初期、伸长初期通过桶栽人工控水模拟干旱胁迫条件下喷施“旱地龙”,探讨最佳抗旱保护剂量和喷施时期,结果表明:1)甘蔗分蘖初期喷施2g/L“旱地龙”处理能明显提高干旱胁迫后过氧化物酶、多酚氧化酶活性;提高渗透调节物质脯氨酸含量,增加胞质浓度;降低膜质过氧化物丙二醛含量;迅速提高干旱胁迫后叶绿素含量;降低或减缓膜透性。2)在甘蔗伸长初期喷施4g/L“旱地龙”效果最好,其过氧化物酶、多酚氧化酶活性、脯氨酸含量、丙二醛含量、叶绿素含量、膜透性的变化表现出与分蘖初期相同的趋势。
2、喷施“旱地龙”对大田甘蔗生理指标的影响。
在宿根蔗复垄期、分蘖和伸长初期通过对大田正常栽培的宿根甘蔗喷施不同浓度“旱地龙”来研究最佳的喷施浓度和时期,结果表明:1)宿根蔗复垄期和分蘖初期分别喷施“旱地龙”浓度4g/L能明显提高其硝酸还原酶活性;稳步持久提高叶片可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和叶绿素含量,为高产稳产打下基础;提高叶片对氮、磷、钾吸收或积累。2)宿根蔗复垄期和伸长初期分别喷施6g/L的“旱地龙”处理效果最好,表现出喷施浓度越高对产量提高效果越好的变化趋势。其酶活性,叶片可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和叶绿素含量及叶片中氮含量或积累等表现出与分蘖初期相似的变化趋势。
3、“旱地龙”对甘蔗生长、品质、效益的影响。
在宿根蔗复垄期、分蘖和伸长初期通过对大田正常栽培的宿根甘蔗喷施不同浓度“旱地龙”来研究农艺性状、品质性状从而获得最高收益。结果表明:不同时期施用不同浓度“旱地龙”表现出不同效果。1)在甘蔗复垄期和分蘖初期喷施“旱地龙”4g/L能显著提高甘蔗生长速度、增粗茎径、提高单茎重;提高甘蔗蔗糖含量,提高甘蔗锤度,蔗汁重力纯度;提高压榨品质;降低蔗汁中还原糖含量;提高单位面积产量和单位面积蔗茎含蔗糖量,最终获得的甘蔗产量、品质和经济收入最佳。2)在甘蔗复垄期和伸长初期喷施不同浓度“旱地龙”研究结果表现出浓度越高甘蔗产量、品质、经济效益越好的现象,处理中的最高浓度6g/L为效果最佳。
This experiment used two scheme and dispart four different methods to spray "Handilong" with sugarcane at the same time,for the purpose of researching the effect on sugarcane.Two scheme,The sugarcane were sprayed with different dose 0g/L,2g/L,4g/L,6g/L "Handilong" in the early tillering and growth stage respectively and the same time.SchemeⅠshows that the lodge root of sugarcane is cultivated,determine its agricultural character,physiological index of leafage,yield,quality,etc.SchemeⅡshows that the sugarcane is cultivated in the barrel in the drought condition.Determine the physiological index correlation with drought situation.The main results are as follows:
1、Effect of "Handilong" on sugarcane in drought resistance with barrel cultivated
To approach the best drought-relief quantity,the contents of several physiological and biochemical indexes in the early days of sugarance's tiller and growth duration were determined in the pot experiment under drought stress by controlling water artificially.The following results were made:In the early days of tiller,the treatment with "dragon on land" spraying concentration of 2g/L significantly improve the activities of Peroxide(POD) and Polyphenol Oxidase(PPO)emzymes,the contents of Proline(Pro)and chlorophyl.At the same time,this treatment decreased Malondialdehyde (MDA)of the spawn of membrance lipid peroxidation and the relatively electric(REC)rate.In the early days of growth duration,the best effect is produced by the treatment with "Handilong" spraying concentration of 4g/L.The physiological and biochemical indexes have a similar trend to that in the early days of tiller.Because of the considerable difference between pot experiment and field experiment,the result can't give a complete presentation of the environment in the field.The field experiment should be required.Additional,because of the limitations of pot experiment,the yield and economic benefits can't be determined.
2、"Handilong" influence on sugarcane lodge root physiological index
Spray different titer "Handilong" at early tillering stage and early growth stage,research optimal spraying time and titer,the results show that spray 4g/L "Handilong" with sugarcane at the early stage can improve the activity of Nitrate reductase(NR),this activity has permanence.Increase the content of solubility sugar(SS)and solubility protein(SP)and chlorophyll steadily and persistent,at the base of high and stabilize yield.Increase the dose of N, P and K or accumulation inside of the leaf,which the high content of N or accumulation inside of the leaf is the representation of bloom growth.At the early growth stage spray "Handilong" shows 6g/L dose which spray with the sugarcane is the best,it shows that the high dose spray,the high effect will have.Enzyme of activity,solubility sugar,solubility protein,chlorophyl,the content of N,P and K or accumulation show the same changes tread as the tillering stage.
3、Influence on sugarcane's growth,quality and benefit by spraying "Handilong"
On the study of spraying different dose "Handilong" in normal planted sugarcane at the stage of early tillering and growth,then find the best growth speed and press quality and the highest benefit.The results show that at different duration spraying different dose of "Handilong" can attain different benefit.At the tillering stage,spraying 4g/L "Handilong" can improve the tillering growth speed and augment stem diameter and added the weight of the stem;and improve the sugar content of the sugarcane's stem and juice;enhance it's tall and the weight of the juice;reduce the sugarcane's fibre;improve the sugarcane's quality;then improve the yield and the stems content sugar of unit acreage,finally,receive the best sugar quality、the highest yield and the best ecomic incomes.However,spraying different dose of "Handilong" at the growth initial proved,the dose is higher and the sugar yield、quality and economy benefit is better,its different with the tillering stage,the highest treat dose is 6g/L can receive the best sugarcane quality、the best theory yield and the best economy benefit.But this trail only set four different level doses,and the higher dose of "Handilong" can receive better effect.
1、喷施“旱地龙”对甘蔗抗旱性的影响。
在甘蔗分蘖初期、伸长初期通过桶栽人工控水模拟干旱胁迫条件下喷施“旱地龙”,探讨最佳抗旱保护剂量和喷施时期,结果表明:1)甘蔗分蘖初期喷施2g/L“旱地龙”处理能明显提高干旱胁迫后过氧化物酶、多酚氧化酶活性;提高渗透调节物质脯氨酸含量,增加胞质浓度;降低膜质过氧化物丙二醛含量;迅速提高干旱胁迫后叶绿素含量;降低或减缓膜透性。2)在甘蔗伸长初期喷施4g/L“旱地龙”效果最好,其过氧化物酶、多酚氧化酶活性、脯氨酸含量、丙二醛含量、叶绿素含量、膜透性的变化表现出与分蘖初期相同的趋势。
2、喷施“旱地龙”对大田甘蔗生理指标的影响。
在宿根蔗复垄期、分蘖和伸长初期通过对大田正常栽培的宿根甘蔗喷施不同浓度“旱地龙”来研究最佳的喷施浓度和时期,结果表明:1)宿根蔗复垄期和分蘖初期分别喷施“旱地龙”浓度4g/L能明显提高其硝酸还原酶活性;稳步持久提高叶片可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和叶绿素含量,为高产稳产打下基础;提高叶片对氮、磷、钾吸收或积累。2)宿根蔗复垄期和伸长初期分别喷施6g/L的“旱地龙”处理效果最好,表现出喷施浓度越高对产量提高效果越好的变化趋势。其酶活性,叶片可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和叶绿素含量及叶片中氮含量或积累等表现出与分蘖初期相似的变化趋势。
3、“旱地龙”对甘蔗生长、品质、效益的影响。
在宿根蔗复垄期、分蘖和伸长初期通过对大田正常栽培的宿根甘蔗喷施不同浓度“旱地龙”来研究农艺性状、品质性状从而获得最高收益。结果表明:不同时期施用不同浓度“旱地龙”表现出不同效果。1)在甘蔗复垄期和分蘖初期喷施“旱地龙”4g/L能显著提高甘蔗生长速度、增粗茎径、提高单茎重;提高甘蔗蔗糖含量,提高甘蔗锤度,蔗汁重力纯度;提高压榨品质;降低蔗汁中还原糖含量;提高单位面积产量和单位面积蔗茎含蔗糖量,最终获得的甘蔗产量、品质和经济收入最佳。2)在甘蔗复垄期和伸长初期喷施不同浓度“旱地龙”研究结果表现出浓度越高甘蔗产量、品质、经济效益越好的现象,处理中的最高浓度6g/L为效果最佳。
This experiment used two scheme and dispart four different methods to spray "Handilong" with sugarcane at the same time,for the purpose of researching the effect on sugarcane.Two scheme,The sugarcane were sprayed with different dose 0g/L,2g/L,4g/L,6g/L "Handilong" in the early tillering and growth stage respectively and the same time.SchemeⅠshows that the lodge root of sugarcane is cultivated,determine its agricultural character,physiological index of leafage,yield,quality,etc.SchemeⅡshows that the sugarcane is cultivated in the barrel in the drought condition.Determine the physiological index correlation with drought situation.The main results are as follows:
1、Effect of "Handilong" on sugarcane in drought resistance with barrel cultivated
To approach the best drought-relief quantity,the contents of several physiological and biochemical indexes in the early days of sugarance's tiller and growth duration were determined in the pot experiment under drought stress by controlling water artificially.The following results were made:In the early days of tiller,the treatment with "dragon on land" spraying concentration of 2g/L significantly improve the activities of Peroxide(POD) and Polyphenol Oxidase(PPO)emzymes,the contents of Proline(Pro)and chlorophyl.At the same time,this treatment decreased Malondialdehyde (MDA)of the spawn of membrance lipid peroxidation and the relatively electric(REC)rate.In the early days of growth duration,the best effect is produced by the treatment with "Handilong" spraying concentration of 4g/L.The physiological and biochemical indexes have a similar trend to that in the early days of tiller.Because of the considerable difference between pot experiment and field experiment,the result can't give a complete presentation of the environment in the field.The field experiment should be required.Additional,because of the limitations of pot experiment,the yield and economic benefits can't be determined.
2、"Handilong" influence on sugarcane lodge root physiological index
Spray different titer "Handilong" at early tillering stage and early growth stage,research optimal spraying time and titer,the results show that spray 4g/L "Handilong" with sugarcane at the early stage can improve the activity of Nitrate reductase(NR),this activity has permanence.Increase the content of solubility sugar(SS)and solubility protein(SP)and chlorophyll steadily and persistent,at the base of high and stabilize yield.Increase the dose of N, P and K or accumulation inside of the leaf,which the high content of N or accumulation inside of the leaf is the representation of bloom growth.At the early growth stage spray "Handilong" shows 6g/L dose which spray with the sugarcane is the best,it shows that the high dose spray,the high effect will have.Enzyme of activity,solubility sugar,solubility protein,chlorophyl,the content of N,P and K or accumulation show the same changes tread as the tillering stage.
3、Influence on sugarcane's growth,quality and benefit by spraying "Handilong"
On the study of spraying different dose "Handilong" in normal planted sugarcane at the stage of early tillering and growth,then find the best growth speed and press quality and the highest benefit.The results show that at different duration spraying different dose of "Handilong" can attain different benefit.At the tillering stage,spraying 4g/L "Handilong" can improve the tillering growth speed and augment stem diameter and added the weight of the stem;and improve the sugar content of the sugarcane's stem and juice;enhance it's tall and the weight of the juice;reduce the sugarcane's fibre;improve the sugarcane's quality;then improve the yield and the stems content sugar of unit acreage,finally,receive the best sugar quality、the highest yield and the best ecomic incomes.However,spraying different dose of "Handilong" at the growth initial proved,the dose is higher and the sugar yield、quality and economy benefit is better,its different with the tillering stage,the highest treat dose is 6g/L can receive the best sugarcane quality、the best theory yield and the best economy benefit.But this trail only set four different level doses,and the higher dose of "Handilong" can receive better effect.
引文
白宝璋,朱广发.玉米光合色素含量快速测定.玉米科学,1994,2(2):77-79
毕勇刚,宋其龙.FA旱地农应用试验及推广研究.节水灌溉,2002,(2):33-35.
蔡武诚,袁厚积.生物物质常用化学分析法.北京:科学出版社,1982
陈能武,杨荣伸,黄久凯.甘蔗抗旱性鉴定方法的研究.四川甘蔗,1992,3(4):5-9
陈如凯,张木清,陆裔波.干旱胁迫对甘蔗生理影响的研究.甘蔗,1995,2(1):1-6
陈如凯,张木清,陆裔波.甘蔗品种的御寒性差异研究.甘蔗,1996,3(1):1-4
陈善福,舒庆尧.植物干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展.植物学通报,1999,16(5):555-560
陈少裕.甘蔗抗旱机理研究现状与展望.福建农学院学报,1991,20(1):12-17
陈祖筹,韦秀新.影响甘蔗生长后期蔗糖分的营养因素分析.甘蔗糖业,1991(6):11-16
高三基,罗俊,陈如凯.甘蔗品种抗旱性光合生理指标及其综合评价.作物报,2002,28(1):94-98
龚明.作物抗旱性鉴定方法与指标及其综合评价.云南大学学报,1989,4(1):73-81
关义新,戴俊英,林艳.水分胁迫下植物叶片光合的气孔限制和非气孔限制.植物生理学通讯,1995,31(4):293-297
广西农业大学植物生理教研室编.南宁:植物生理学实验指导书.1995
郭连旺,沈允钢.高等植物光合机构避免强光破坏的保护机制.植物生理学通讯,1996,32(1):1-8
郭卫东,沈向,李嘉瑞.植物抗旱的分子机理.西北农业大学学报,1999,27(4):102-108
何平,施伟平.甘蔗苗过氧化物酶的分离、纯化及性质测定.上海交通大学学报,2003(2):131-134
何文章,吴成兵,贾中干.“FA旱地龙”在玉米上的应用效果.安徽农业学,2000,28(5):610-668
何雪银,黄有总,陈超君,等.甘蔗品种新植生产性能研究.广西蔗糖,2002(2):10-14
候松泽,张书,张玉红.“FA旱地龙”节水增产初探.黑龙江水利科技,2001,3:114-115
胡继友,黄日宏.甘蔗喷施植物营养调节剂“旱地龙”的效果.甘蔗,2002,9(4):31-32
华东师大生物系植物生理教研室编.植物生理学实验指导.上海科学出版社,1980:73-75
黄仁好.“旱宝”保水剂在甘蔗上的试验效果.广西热带农业,2002,4:10
黄荣韶,莫家让.旱地甘蔗若干生理特性比较及其与抗旱的关系.广西农业大学学报,1995,14(3):201-206
黄荣韶.甘蔗叶片的几个生理特性与抗旱能力的关系.广西农业大学学报,1994,13(2):151-154
黄有总,徐建云,陈超君.几个甘蔗新品种的抗旱性和抗寒性比较研究.广西农业生物科学,2002,21(2):101-104
霍润丰,徐建云,李端富.甘蔗栽培学.南宁:广西农学院,1991,10
霍仕平,晏庆九,宋光英,等.玉米抗旱鉴定的形态和生理生化指标研究进展.干旱地区农业研究,1995,13(3):67-73
经艳芬,桃联安,杨李和.云南野生甘蔗种质血缘F3代亲本材料抗旱性研究初报.甘蔗,2002,9(1):19-23
李富生,何丽莲.植物对非生物胁迫的生理响应及甘蔗抗旱抗寒性研究进展.甘蔗,2004,11(1):31-37
李广敏,关余锋.作物抗旱生理与节水技术研究.北京:气象出版社,2001
李豪喆.不同类型水稻幼苗硝酸还原酶的活力.实验生物学报,1981,14(4):407-409
李豪喆.大豆叶片硝酸还原酶活力的研究.植物生理学通讯,1986(4):30-32
李林.推广使用“旱地龙”开辟广西抗旱新途径.中国水利,2004(5):54-55
李荣昌.甘蔗的营养生理及相应的农业措施.广西热作科技,1992(2):45-47
李杨瑞.不同基因型甘蔗叶片水溶性蛋白质含量和含水量的研究.甘蔗糖业,2000(6):17-19
李杨瑞.甘蔗组织中过氧化物酶活性及其与生长和工艺成熟的关系初探.广西农学院学报,1990,9(1):13-18
李玉潜,谢九生,谭中文.甘蔗叶片碳氮代谢与产量、品质关系研究初探.中国农科学,1995,28(4):46-53
梁广焜.论旱害对甘蔗生长和制糖工业的影响.甘蔗科技通讯,1981,(2):6-10
梁丽琼,谭裕模,曾洁清.甘蔗叶片生态特征及脯氨酸含量、膜透性与抗旱性关系研究.甘蔗,1995,2(4):14-19
梁丽琼,谭裕模,张革民.甘蔗抗旱性鉴定技术研究.广西农学报,1998,(4):15-21
梁咏诚,李强,吕日华.甘蔗施用保水剂试验总结.广西蔗糖,2006,(20):19-21
廖北周,陈渐佳,金玉峰.甘蔗耐旱与脯氨酸.甘蔗糖业,1988(4):22-23
廖兆周,劳方业,周耀辉.具有斑茅种质的耐旱甘蔗品系的选育.作物学报,2002,28(6):841-846
廖兆周.甘蔗耐旱与脯氨酸.甘蔗糖业,1988,(4):22-23
林国栋,谷丽萍.甘蔗硝酸还原酶活性与氮素营养的关系.福建农业大学报.1998(4):301-305
林炎坤.常用的几种蒽酮比色定糖法的比较和改进.植物生理学通讯,1989(4):53-55
林振武,陈敬祥,汤玉玮.硝酸还原酶活力与作物耐肥性的研究.不同耐肥性的水稻、玉米、小麦 硝酸还原酶活力.中国农业科学,1983(3):37-43
林振武.硝酸还原酶的研究在农业上的应用.作物杂志,1985(4):12-13
凌启鸿.作物群体质量.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2000
刘海斌,何红,黄家雍.几个甘蔗品种(品系)抗旱性能研究初报.广西蔗糖,1997,8(3):24-27
刘艳利,斐跃昌.“旱地龙”节水增产作用大.水利天地,2001,01:43
刘子凡.土壤保水剂对甘蔗抗旱性的作用机理研究.广州:华南农业大学硕士论文,2002
卢从明,张其德,匡廷云.水分胁迫对甘薯叶肉细胞光合电子传递的影响.植物学通报,1994,11(1):43-47
陆国盈,韩世健,韦恢乐.甘蔗几个引进新品种抗旱性研究初报.广西蔗糖,1999,17(4):5-9
陆国盈.甘蔗检糖技术.南宁:广西大学农学院内部讲义,1994
陆挪生.甘蔗生理知识讲座.湛江甘蔗科技,1981,(2):42
罗辉,李琳,凌剑峰.“FA旱地龙”在甘蔗上的应用效果.甘蔗,2003,10(1):34-37
罗俊,张木清,林彦铨,等.甘蔗叶绿素荧光参数,MDA含量及膜透性与耐旱性的关系.福建农业大学学报,1999,28(3):257-262
莫家让,周承圣.甘蔗栽培育种的生理基础.福州:福建科技出版社,1984
南京农业大学主编.土壤农化分析.北京:农业出版社,1981
潘瑞帜.植物生理学(第三版),北京:高等教育出版社,2001
潘世明.甘蔗抗旱性直接鉴定法的综合评价.福建甘蔗,1995,(1):25-28
轻工部甘蔗糖业科学研究所,广东省农业科学院.中国甘蔗栽培学.北京:中国农业出版社,1984
轻工业部甘蔗糖业科学研究所等合编.中国甘蔗品种志.广州:广东科技出版社,1991
谭裕模.甘蔗叶片脂肪酸及透性与抗旱性关系.福建农学院学报,1988,17(3):211-215
汤玉玮,林振武,陈敬祥.硝酸还原酶活力与作物耐肥性的相关及其在生化育种上应用的探讨.中国农业科学,1985(6):39-45
汤章城.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的积累及可能意义.植物生理学通讯,1984,10(4):15-27
王鉴明,温礼,陈以诚.甘蔗中水抗旱栽培技术.甘蔗糖业,1984,(5):10-15
文建成,陈学宽,符菊芬.质膜透性与丙二醛(MDA)含量的变化评价甘蔗品种抗旱性初探.甘蔗,1998,5(3):1-5
吴才文,陈能武,杨荣仲.水分胁迫及复水对甘蔗生长发育及相关生理指标的影响.甘蔗,1998,5(3):6
吴才文,王建光,陈学宽.几种甘蔗品种(系)前期生长特性及抗旱性分析.甘蔗糖业,2003 (1):10-15
邢兆运,陈国安.“旱地龙”急运北方旱区.中国农机化报,2000-07-18(001)
徐永胜.甘蔗愈伤组织对水分胁迫的生理反应及其抗旱性.南宁:广西农学院硕士论文,1986
许大全,光合作用效率.上海:上海科学技术出版社.2002
杨凯,易小平,胡荣海,等.干旱胁迫下小麦脯氨酸积累量相关基因的染色体定位.作物学报,2001,27(3):363-366
杨瑞丽.植物抗旱机制研究进展.内蒙古科技与经济,2003,4:107-108
杨生超.甘蔗抗旱栽培技术研究进展.中国糖料,2001(3):34-37
叶燕萍,李杨瑞,黄诚梅.下种方式和水分胁迫对甘蔗叶片光合特性的影响.甘蔗,2003,10(3):1-4
叶燕萍,李杨瑞,李永健.不同种苗处理方式甘蔗对干旱条件的反应.热带作物学报,2001,22(2):62-67
叶燕萍,李杨瑞,罗霆,等.乙烯利浸种对甘蔗抗旱性的影响.中国农学通报,2005,21(6):387-389
游明安,盖钧镬,马育华,等.大豆叶片光合速率与气孔导度、叶肉导度的关系.作物学报,1995(2):145-149
余让才,李明启,范燕萍.高等植物硝酸还原酶的光调控.植物生理学通讯,1997,33(1):61-65
曾华宗,郑成木.甘蔗抗旱生理测验及BADH基因PCR扩增的研究.热带作物学报,2003,24(1):55-58
曾献军.甘蔗化控技术研究进展.甘蔗,1996,3(1):19-27
张木清,陈如凯,余松烈.水分胁迫下蔗叶活性氧代谢的数学分析.作物学报,1996,22(6):729-735
张木清,陈如凯.甘蔗抗旱性的遗传改良.中国农学通报,1994,10(1):29-33
张木清.甘蔗耐旱生理基础及其化学调控.福州:福建农业大学博士学位论文,1994,12
张卫星,赵致,廖景容等.作物抗旱剂的应用研究进展.中国农学通报,2004,20(6):334-339
张宪政主编.作物生理研究法.北京:中国农业出版社,1992
赵世杰,许长成.植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进.植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):207-210
中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会编.现代植物生理学实验指南,北京:科学出版社,1999
中国植物生理学会植物生长物质分会,中国植物保护学会杂草学分会编.植物生长物质和除草剂研究及应用进展.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998,11
钟希琼,叶振邦.综合评价甘蔗的抗旱性及其抗旱生理指标.华南农业大学学报,17(3):81-84
周鸿凯,叶振邦.干旱对甘蔗叶片的细胞透性及脯氨酸积累效应研究初报.甘蔗糖业,1988,(2):39-41
周树,郑相穆.硝酸还原酶体内分析方法探讨.植物生理学通讯,1995(1):47-49
周主贵.甘蔗施用“旱地龙”效应研究.南宁:广西大学硕士论文,2007
邹志国,夏杰,姚爱芳.“旱地龙”在江苏沿海地区水稻控制灌溉中应用初探.中国农村水利水电,2000,11:16-17
Evan SH.Some aspect of the problem of drought resistance in sugarcane.SugarCane Tech,1935(6):802-808
Gesnell JM.陈代华译.收获前干旱处理对甘蔗产量和品质的影响.甘蔗糖业(甘蔗分刊),1978(4):56-61
Koehler PH,Moore PH,Jone SA.Response of drip-irrigated sugarcane to drought stress.Agrons,1982,74:906-911
Lawlor DW,Comic G.Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants.Plant Cell Environ 2002,25:275-294
Menesesrs.Assessment of drought resistance in sugarcane varieties through the determination of there lease of electrolytes.ATAC,1985,14(6):11-16
Rao C K,Asokan S.Studies on flee praline association drought resistance in sugarcane.The sugar Journal,1982,74,906-911
Rao C K,Asckans.Studies on free praline association to drought resistance in sugarcane.The Sugar,1978,(1):23-24
Rutnerfordrs.The assessment of praline accumulation a same chanism of drough tresistance in sugarcane.Prec SA fric SugTech Asseci,1989,136-141
Sheu Y.S,YANG,EC,Li S.W.Effects of soil moisture on the growth and maturity of recent sugarcane varieties in Taiwan.Taiwan Sugar,Tainan,1992,39(3):12-16
Thuljaramjr.Leaf mid-rib structure of sugarcane as correlated with resistance to the top-borer.IndianJAgricSci,1947(17):203-210
Venkatararnanas,Cururajaraopn,Maidukm.The effects of water stress during the formation phaseofstomatal resistance and lea water potential and its relation ship withyield in the sugarcane varieties.Field Crop Research,1986(13):345-353
Venkataramanas.Evaluation of celluar membrane stability for screening drought-resistant sugarcane varieties.Sugarcane,1983(4):13-15
毕勇刚,宋其龙.FA旱地农应用试验及推广研究.节水灌溉,2002,(2):33-35.
蔡武诚,袁厚积.生物物质常用化学分析法.北京:科学出版社,1982
陈能武,杨荣伸,黄久凯.甘蔗抗旱性鉴定方法的研究.四川甘蔗,1992,3(4):5-9
陈如凯,张木清,陆裔波.干旱胁迫对甘蔗生理影响的研究.甘蔗,1995,2(1):1-6
陈如凯,张木清,陆裔波.甘蔗品种的御寒性差异研究.甘蔗,1996,3(1):1-4
陈善福,舒庆尧.植物干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展.植物学通报,1999,16(5):555-560
陈少裕.甘蔗抗旱机理研究现状与展望.福建农学院学报,1991,20(1):12-17
陈祖筹,韦秀新.影响甘蔗生长后期蔗糖分的营养因素分析.甘蔗糖业,1991(6):11-16
高三基,罗俊,陈如凯.甘蔗品种抗旱性光合生理指标及其综合评价.作物报,2002,28(1):94-98
龚明.作物抗旱性鉴定方法与指标及其综合评价.云南大学学报,1989,4(1):73-81
关义新,戴俊英,林艳.水分胁迫下植物叶片光合的气孔限制和非气孔限制.植物生理学通讯,1995,31(4):293-297
广西农业大学植物生理教研室编.南宁:植物生理学实验指导书.1995
郭连旺,沈允钢.高等植物光合机构避免强光破坏的保护机制.植物生理学通讯,1996,32(1):1-8
郭卫东,沈向,李嘉瑞.植物抗旱的分子机理.西北农业大学学报,1999,27(4):102-108
何平,施伟平.甘蔗苗过氧化物酶的分离、纯化及性质测定.上海交通大学学报,2003(2):131-134
何文章,吴成兵,贾中干.“FA旱地龙”在玉米上的应用效果.安徽农业学,2000,28(5):610-668
何雪银,黄有总,陈超君,等.甘蔗品种新植生产性能研究.广西蔗糖,2002(2):10-14
候松泽,张书,张玉红.“FA旱地龙”节水增产初探.黑龙江水利科技,2001,3:114-115
胡继友,黄日宏.甘蔗喷施植物营养调节剂“旱地龙”的效果.甘蔗,2002,9(4):31-32
华东师大生物系植物生理教研室编.植物生理学实验指导.上海科学出版社,1980:73-75
黄仁好.“旱宝”保水剂在甘蔗上的试验效果.广西热带农业,2002,4:10
黄荣韶,莫家让.旱地甘蔗若干生理特性比较及其与抗旱的关系.广西农业大学学报,1995,14(3):201-206
黄荣韶.甘蔗叶片的几个生理特性与抗旱能力的关系.广西农业大学学报,1994,13(2):151-154
黄有总,徐建云,陈超君.几个甘蔗新品种的抗旱性和抗寒性比较研究.广西农业生物科学,2002,21(2):101-104
霍润丰,徐建云,李端富.甘蔗栽培学.南宁:广西农学院,1991,10
霍仕平,晏庆九,宋光英,等.玉米抗旱鉴定的形态和生理生化指标研究进展.干旱地区农业研究,1995,13(3):67-73
经艳芬,桃联安,杨李和.云南野生甘蔗种质血缘F3代亲本材料抗旱性研究初报.甘蔗,2002,9(1):19-23
李富生,何丽莲.植物对非生物胁迫的生理响应及甘蔗抗旱抗寒性研究进展.甘蔗,2004,11(1):31-37
李广敏,关余锋.作物抗旱生理与节水技术研究.北京:气象出版社,2001
李豪喆.不同类型水稻幼苗硝酸还原酶的活力.实验生物学报,1981,14(4):407-409
李豪喆.大豆叶片硝酸还原酶活力的研究.植物生理学通讯,1986(4):30-32
李林.推广使用“旱地龙”开辟广西抗旱新途径.中国水利,2004(5):54-55
李荣昌.甘蔗的营养生理及相应的农业措施.广西热作科技,1992(2):45-47
李杨瑞.不同基因型甘蔗叶片水溶性蛋白质含量和含水量的研究.甘蔗糖业,2000(6):17-19
李杨瑞.甘蔗组织中过氧化物酶活性及其与生长和工艺成熟的关系初探.广西农学院学报,1990,9(1):13-18
李玉潜,谢九生,谭中文.甘蔗叶片碳氮代谢与产量、品质关系研究初探.中国农科学,1995,28(4):46-53
梁广焜.论旱害对甘蔗生长和制糖工业的影响.甘蔗科技通讯,1981,(2):6-10
梁丽琼,谭裕模,曾洁清.甘蔗叶片生态特征及脯氨酸含量、膜透性与抗旱性关系研究.甘蔗,1995,2(4):14-19
梁丽琼,谭裕模,张革民.甘蔗抗旱性鉴定技术研究.广西农学报,1998,(4):15-21
梁咏诚,李强,吕日华.甘蔗施用保水剂试验总结.广西蔗糖,2006,(20):19-21
廖北周,陈渐佳,金玉峰.甘蔗耐旱与脯氨酸.甘蔗糖业,1988(4):22-23
廖兆周,劳方业,周耀辉.具有斑茅种质的耐旱甘蔗品系的选育.作物学报,2002,28(6):841-846
廖兆周.甘蔗耐旱与脯氨酸.甘蔗糖业,1988,(4):22-23
林国栋,谷丽萍.甘蔗硝酸还原酶活性与氮素营养的关系.福建农业大学报.1998(4):301-305
林炎坤.常用的几种蒽酮比色定糖法的比较和改进.植物生理学通讯,1989(4):53-55
林振武,陈敬祥,汤玉玮.硝酸还原酶活力与作物耐肥性的研究.不同耐肥性的水稻、玉米、小麦 硝酸还原酶活力.中国农业科学,1983(3):37-43
林振武.硝酸还原酶的研究在农业上的应用.作物杂志,1985(4):12-13
凌启鸿.作物群体质量.上海:上海科学技术出版社,2000
刘海斌,何红,黄家雍.几个甘蔗品种(品系)抗旱性能研究初报.广西蔗糖,1997,8(3):24-27
刘艳利,斐跃昌.“旱地龙”节水增产作用大.水利天地,2001,01:43
刘子凡.土壤保水剂对甘蔗抗旱性的作用机理研究.广州:华南农业大学硕士论文,2002
卢从明,张其德,匡廷云.水分胁迫对甘薯叶肉细胞光合电子传递的影响.植物学通报,1994,11(1):43-47
陆国盈,韩世健,韦恢乐.甘蔗几个引进新品种抗旱性研究初报.广西蔗糖,1999,17(4):5-9
陆国盈.甘蔗检糖技术.南宁:广西大学农学院内部讲义,1994
陆挪生.甘蔗生理知识讲座.湛江甘蔗科技,1981,(2):42
罗辉,李琳,凌剑峰.“FA旱地龙”在甘蔗上的应用效果.甘蔗,2003,10(1):34-37
罗俊,张木清,林彦铨,等.甘蔗叶绿素荧光参数,MDA含量及膜透性与耐旱性的关系.福建农业大学学报,1999,28(3):257-262
莫家让,周承圣.甘蔗栽培育种的生理基础.福州:福建科技出版社,1984
南京农业大学主编.土壤农化分析.北京:农业出版社,1981
潘瑞帜.植物生理学(第三版),北京:高等教育出版社,2001
潘世明.甘蔗抗旱性直接鉴定法的综合评价.福建甘蔗,1995,(1):25-28
轻工部甘蔗糖业科学研究所,广东省农业科学院.中国甘蔗栽培学.北京:中国农业出版社,1984
轻工业部甘蔗糖业科学研究所等合编.中国甘蔗品种志.广州:广东科技出版社,1991
谭裕模.甘蔗叶片脂肪酸及透性与抗旱性关系.福建农学院学报,1988,17(3):211-215
汤玉玮,林振武,陈敬祥.硝酸还原酶活力与作物耐肥性的相关及其在生化育种上应用的探讨.中国农业科学,1985(6):39-45
汤章城.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的积累及可能意义.植物生理学通讯,1984,10(4):15-27
王鉴明,温礼,陈以诚.甘蔗中水抗旱栽培技术.甘蔗糖业,1984,(5):10-15
文建成,陈学宽,符菊芬.质膜透性与丙二醛(MDA)含量的变化评价甘蔗品种抗旱性初探.甘蔗,1998,5(3):1-5
吴才文,陈能武,杨荣仲.水分胁迫及复水对甘蔗生长发育及相关生理指标的影响.甘蔗,1998,5(3):6
吴才文,王建光,陈学宽.几种甘蔗品种(系)前期生长特性及抗旱性分析.甘蔗糖业,2003 (1):10-15
邢兆运,陈国安.“旱地龙”急运北方旱区.中国农机化报,2000-07-18(001)
徐永胜.甘蔗愈伤组织对水分胁迫的生理反应及其抗旱性.南宁:广西农学院硕士论文,1986
许大全,光合作用效率.上海:上海科学技术出版社.2002
杨凯,易小平,胡荣海,等.干旱胁迫下小麦脯氨酸积累量相关基因的染色体定位.作物学报,2001,27(3):363-366
杨瑞丽.植物抗旱机制研究进展.内蒙古科技与经济,2003,4:107-108
杨生超.甘蔗抗旱栽培技术研究进展.中国糖料,2001(3):34-37
叶燕萍,李杨瑞,黄诚梅.下种方式和水分胁迫对甘蔗叶片光合特性的影响.甘蔗,2003,10(3):1-4
叶燕萍,李杨瑞,李永健.不同种苗处理方式甘蔗对干旱条件的反应.热带作物学报,2001,22(2):62-67
叶燕萍,李杨瑞,罗霆,等.乙烯利浸种对甘蔗抗旱性的影响.中国农学通报,2005,21(6):387-389
游明安,盖钧镬,马育华,等.大豆叶片光合速率与气孔导度、叶肉导度的关系.作物学报,1995(2):145-149
余让才,李明启,范燕萍.高等植物硝酸还原酶的光调控.植物生理学通讯,1997,33(1):61-65
曾华宗,郑成木.甘蔗抗旱生理测验及BADH基因PCR扩增的研究.热带作物学报,2003,24(1):55-58
曾献军.甘蔗化控技术研究进展.甘蔗,1996,3(1):19-27
张木清,陈如凯,余松烈.水分胁迫下蔗叶活性氧代谢的数学分析.作物学报,1996,22(6):729-735
张木清,陈如凯.甘蔗抗旱性的遗传改良.中国农学通报,1994,10(1):29-33
张木清.甘蔗耐旱生理基础及其化学调控.福州:福建农业大学博士学位论文,1994,12
张卫星,赵致,廖景容等.作物抗旱剂的应用研究进展.中国农学通报,2004,20(6):334-339
张宪政主编.作物生理研究法.北京:中国农业出版社,1992
赵世杰,许长成.植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进.植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):207-210
中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会编.现代植物生理学实验指南,北京:科学出版社,1999
中国植物生理学会植物生长物质分会,中国植物保护学会杂草学分会编.植物生长物质和除草剂研究及应用进展.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998,11
钟希琼,叶振邦.综合评价甘蔗的抗旱性及其抗旱生理指标.华南农业大学学报,17(3):81-84
周鸿凯,叶振邦.干旱对甘蔗叶片的细胞透性及脯氨酸积累效应研究初报.甘蔗糖业,1988,(2):39-41
周树,郑相穆.硝酸还原酶体内分析方法探讨.植物生理学通讯,1995(1):47-49
周主贵.甘蔗施用“旱地龙”效应研究.南宁:广西大学硕士论文,2007
邹志国,夏杰,姚爱芳.“旱地龙”在江苏沿海地区水稻控制灌溉中应用初探.中国农村水利水电,2000,11:16-17
Evan SH.Some aspect of the problem of drought resistance in sugarcane.SugarCane Tech,1935(6):802-808
Gesnell JM.陈代华译.收获前干旱处理对甘蔗产量和品质的影响.甘蔗糖业(甘蔗分刊),1978(4):56-61
Koehler PH,Moore PH,Jone SA.Response of drip-irrigated sugarcane to drought stress.Agrons,1982,74:906-911
Lawlor DW,Comic G.Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants.Plant Cell Environ 2002,25:275-294
Menesesrs.Assessment of drought resistance in sugarcane varieties through the determination of there lease of electrolytes.ATAC,1985,14(6):11-16
Rao C K,Asokan S.Studies on flee praline association drought resistance in sugarcane.The sugar Journal,1982,74,906-911
Rao C K,Asckans.Studies on free praline association to drought resistance in sugarcane.The Sugar,1978,(1):23-24
Rutnerfordrs.The assessment of praline accumulation a same chanism of drough tresistance in sugarcane.Prec SA fric SugTech Asseci,1989,136-141
Sheu Y.S,YANG,EC,Li S.W.Effects of soil moisture on the growth and maturity of recent sugarcane varieties in Taiwan.Taiwan Sugar,Tainan,1992,39(3):12-16
Thuljaramjr.Leaf mid-rib structure of sugarcane as correlated with resistance to the top-borer.IndianJAgricSci,1947(17):203-210
Venkatararnanas,Cururajaraopn,Maidukm.The effects of water stress during the formation phaseofstomatal resistance and lea water potential and its relation ship withyield in the sugarcane varieties.Field Crop Research,1986(13):345-353
Venkataramanas.Evaluation of celluar membrane stability for screening drought-resistant sugarcane varieties.Sugarcane,1983(4):13-15