用户名: 密码: 验证码:
浙贝母碱逆转肺癌A549/DDP细胞株多药耐药及其机理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:
     1.探讨“痰邪致病”与肺癌多药耐药相关性的中医理论。
     2.探讨肺癌中医证候与化疗疗效的相关性。
     3.探讨浙贝母碱逆转A549/DDP肺癌细胞株耐药的作用及可能的机理。
     方法:
     1.梳理中医学关于肺癌的古今文献资料,采用“取象比类”的方法将“痰邪致病”与肺癌耐药特点进行类比。
     2.回顾性分析282例肺癌患者中医证候类型与化疗疗效的相关性,作为本论文的临床工作基础研究。
     3.以理论和临床研究为基础,展开实验研究,以A549/DDP耐药肺癌细胞株为研究对象,以川芎嗪做对照药物,采用MTT法检测细胞耐药倍数、浙贝母碱的最佳逆转耐药浓度及逆转耐药倍数;用流式细胞仪检测耐药细胞凋亡率,细胞免疫荧光法检测L-RP蛋白表达,RT-PCR检测细胞ERCC1-mRNA表达。
     结果:
     1.通过文献整理及“取象比类”的方法,论文提出“痰邪是肺癌多药耐药的重要病因,化痰散结法是治疗肺癌多药耐药的基本治法”的假说。
     2.临床研究显示:正气亏虚证型组较气虚痰湿型组、气血瘀滞型组和阴虚热毒型组肺癌对化疗有效率高(64.1%),治疗期间患者更少的出现疾病进展(19.6%)。正气亏虚型与气虚痰湿型两组相比,气虚痰湿型肺癌化疗有效率低,更多的患者出现进展。中位肿瘤进展时间和总生存时间单纯正气亏虚证型组优于其他各组。
     3.实验研究显示:A549/DDP耐药倍数为13.08倍,细胞高度耐药。空白对照组、DDP组、川芎嗪实验组、浙贝母碱实验组各组随DDP浓度的增加,药物对A549/DDP细胞的抑制率不断增加。川芎嗪实验组逆转倍数3.62,浙贝母碱实验组逆转倍数3.73。流式细胞仪检测凋亡发生率各组分别为2.56±0.44、13.5±1.42、33.82±4.56、38.16±2.25,川芎嗪实验组和浙贝母碱实验组与空白对照组和DDP组比较差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。细胞免疫荧光测定的结果显示,川芎嗪实验组和浙贝母碱实验组较空白对照组和DDP组的L-RP表达明显降低(p <0.05)。各组ERCC1mRNA表达分别为0.62±0.04、0.56±0.03、0.36±0.07、0.32±0.08,川芎嗪实验组和浙贝母碱实验组与空白对照组和DDP组比较显著降低了ERCC1mRNA的表达,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。
     结论:
     1.本论文理论研究部分提出假说,通过文献整理及“取象比类”为假说提供了理论依据。理论研究的内容丰富了中医学对肺癌多药耐药的认识。
     2.临床研究提示正气亏虚型是晚期肺癌中预后较好的分型,气虚痰湿型、气血瘀滞型和阴虚热毒型是晚期肺癌中预后较差的分型,推测肺癌的发生、发展可能遵从先出现正气亏虚,而后合并出现痰阻、瘀血、热毒致虚实夹杂,最后出现邪盛正衰的病机演变规律,而合并出现痰浊、瘀血、热毒等实邪时化疗有效率降低、生存期缩短、疾病进展迅速可能与对化疗药物的多药耐药有关。这为假说提供了临床方面的证据支持。
     3.实验研究提示浙贝母碱可逆转肺癌A549/DDP细胞株的多药耐药,其机理与促进细胞凋亡、下调L-RP蛋白表达、抑制ERCC1mRNA表达,从而降低DNA的修复能力有关。这为假说提供了实验方面的证据支持。
Objective:
     1.To study theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)between sputum evil andLung Cancer multi-drug resistance(MDR).
     2.To explore correlation between syndromes of TCM and effect of chemotherapyabout Lung Cancer.
     3.To explore effect and mechanism of MDR in adenocarcinoma line A549/DDPreversed by peimine.
     Methods:
     1. Through reviewing literature of TCM about Lung Cancer, contrasting featuresof sputum evil and Lung Cancer MDR,dissertation put forward a hypothesis.
     2.On base of clinical practice,the dissertation supported hypothesis byretrospective analysis in282Lung Cancer patients.
     3.On base of theoretical and clinical pratice,the dissertation developed experimentto assure the hepothesis.MTT assay was employed to measure cell resistant index andreversing effect, flow cytometry was used to analyse apoptosis, cell immunofluorescencetechnique was used to measure expression of resistance associated protein LRP, RT-PCRwas employed to evaluate expression of ERCC1-mRNA.
     Results:
     1.The dissertation put forward a hypothesis that sputum evil might be importantreason of MDR,Huatan Sanjie might be basic law of reversing Lung Cancer MDR.
     2.The clinical study showed that RR,TTP,OS in team of Vital qi deficiency bemuch better than in the other groups.
     3.Resistant index in A549/DDP line was13.08.There were common feature that cellinhibitory rate increased with the increase of DDP concertration among blank contronlgroup,DDP contronl group,Tetramethylpyrazine experiment group and peimine experimentgroup.Reverse index of Tetramethylpyrazine experiment group was3.62,thus that ofpeimine experiment group was3.73.Apoptosis rate of the four group was respectively2.56±0.44、13.5±1.42、33.82±4.56、38.16±2.25,in which that of the experiment group wasmuch more than that of the control group.Cell immunofluorescence technique showed thatthe expression of L-RP in experiment group was much lower than that in the control group(p <0.05).The expression of ERCC1mRNAwas respectively0.62±0.04、0.56±0.03、0.36±0.07、0.32±0.08,the difference between the experiment group and the control groupwas statistically significant(p <0.05).
     Conclusions:
     1.On the base of the literatural study and analogy,the doctoral dissertation putforward a hypothesis,and provided it by lots of evidence.
     2.Vital qi deficiency was the most better prognosis of all syndromes. RR,TTP,OSwould decrease when sputum evil,blood stasis,heat evil appeared.The phenomenonwould be the result of MDR.
     3.Peimine could reverse MDR in A549/DDP cell line.Inducing apoptosis, down-regulating L-RP and ERCC1mRNA express were the possible mechanisms.
引文
[1]王永炎,李明富,戴锡孟.中医内科学.第六版.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1997,91-93.
    [2]骆文斌,吴承玉.肺癌病因病机研究.辽宁中医药大学学报,2009,11(3):16-17.
    [3]尤杰.刘嘉湘.扶正治癌学术思想初探.中华中医药学刊,2011,29(8):1829-1831.
    [4]马廷行,唐晓勇,李春华.滋阴清热解毒法治疗肺癌的研究进展.山东中医杂志,2008,27(3):207-209.
    [5]刘嘉湘,施志明,徐振华,等.滋阴生津益气温阳法治疗晚期原发性肺癌的临床研究[J].中医杂志,1995,36(3):155-158.
    [6]王雄文,周岱翰.肺癌病发病的病因及藏象经络机制.时珍国医国药,2009,20(10):2641-2642.
    [7]邓海滨,王中奇.徐振晔辨治肺癌经验[J].四川中医,2002,20(6):1-3
    [8]李际强.刘伟胜.攻毒法治疗肺癌经验简介.辽宁中医杂志,2009,36(3):340-341.
    [9]倪娅,邱幸凡.补肺通络解毒法治疗肺癌的思路探讨.光明中医,2009,24(8):1459-1460.
    [10]张霆.从伏气学说探讨肺癌之病因病机.中医研究,2007,20(3):5-7.
    [11]郑红刚,花宝金.朴炳奎.辨证治疗肺癌的学术思想[J].北京中医,2007,26(5):273-275.
    [12]刘嘉湘.中医药治疗肺癌研究思路和临床经验.世界中医药,2007,2(2),67-70.
    [13]陈锐深,曹洋.辨证论治肺癌132例分析.中医药学刊,2005,23(4):593-594.
    [14]刘振东,吴林生.周维顺.治疗肺癌经验[J].浙江中医学院学报,2004,28(2):39-40.
    [15]马纯政,牛喜伟.中医辨证治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌62例[J].中医杂志,2003,44(8):608.
    [16]唐引引,徐立然.原发性支气管肺癌中医证型和用药规律分析.中医学报,2012,27(166):278-280.
    [17]王淑美,林丽珠,聂慧.北京、广州中医名家论治肺癌的专家共识及南北用药特色.中国中西医结合杂志,2011,31(7):977-980.
    [18]黎壮伟,曹洋,陈志坚.陈锐深教授治疗原发性支气管肺癌的经验.中医药学报,2006,34(5):17-18.
    [19]何秀兰,胡凯文,肖俐.王沛教授防治肺癌术后复发转移临床经验.中国中医基础医学杂志,2006,12(3):222-224.
    [20]周岱翰,林丽珠,周宜强.益气除痰法延长非小细胞肺癌中位生存期的作用.中医杂志,2005,46(8):600-602.
    [21]王芬,胡凯文,肖俐.二陈汤对CAM-1高表达肺癌A549细胞的影响.中国中医基础医学杂志,2010,16(12):1126-1127.
    [22]杨勤建,陈振发,雷良蔚.化痰散结方对人肺癌SPC-A1细胞内cAMP、cGMP浓度的影响.湖北中医学院学报,2003,5(1):17-19.
    [23]杨勤建,陈振发,雷良蔚.化痰散结方对人肺癌细胞Fas-FasL和TNFR1信号通路的影响.中国中西医结合杂志,2004,24卷基础理论特辑:183-186.
    [24]田菲,贾文娟,邢秀玲,等.扶正合剂含药血清对肺癌细胞生长及耐药基因表达的影响.中医研究,2008,20(8):22-22.
    [25]何欣,曾柏荣,刘华.丹参酮ⅡA对小鼠Lewis肺癌获得性多药耐药及相关酶系影响的实验研究.中医药导报,2010,16(9):89-91.
    [26]曹勇,张丹,郑广娟,等.补肾化瘀解毒方药物血清对肺癌A549/DDP耐药细胞内药物浓度的影响.山东中医药大学学报,2003,27(5):389-391.
    [27]邢立强,李旺,孙黎,等.瑞香狼毒提取物逆转肺癌细胞耐药的免疫组化研究.陕西中医,2007,28(4):500-501.
    [28]李雪真.乳腺癌中医证型与跨膜糖蛋白(P-gp)、乳腺癌耐药蛋白(BCRP)的相关性分析.2007.广州中医药大学硕士论文.
    [29]中国抗癌协会.《新编常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范》,第九分册-原发性支气管肺癌,北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,1999:773~781.
    [30]孙燕.,周际昌主编.实用肿瘤内科学.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.541.
    [31]中华人民共和国卫生部.中药新药临床研究指导原则(第一辑).中药新药治疗原发性支气管肺癌的临床研究指导原则.北京:人民卫生出版社,1993,219-221.
    [32] Chen XQ,Yang S,Li ZY,et al。Effects and mechanism of downregulation of survivinexpression by RNA interference on proliferation and apoptosis of lung cancercells.Mol Med Report.2012,5(4):917-922.
    [33]吴晶,王琪,王佳瑞.GRP78在肺腺癌细胞顺铂耐药中的作用.中国肺癌杂志,2010,13(1):38-41.
    [34]夏莹,胡成平,张梅春等.靶向ERCC1RNA干扰对人肺腺癌细胞顺铂耐药的逆转.中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2007,14(6):531-535.
    [35]左云,黄建安,沈东.托瑞米芬逆转肺癌耐药细胞株SP/N多药耐药性的研究,肿瘤基础与临床,2008,21(1):30-33.
    [36]张晓春,曲凤声,岳长青.非小细胞肺癌多药耐药基因表达及环孢菌素A对其逆转作用.中国肺癌杂志,2000,3(3):170-174.
    [37]胡江文,沈振亚,郑世营.联合应用γ-干扰素与维拉帕米对人肺癌细胞株LRP表达的影响.苏州大学学报(医学版),2005,25(5):809-812.
    [38] Yamazaki R,Nishiyama Y,Furuta T,et al. Novel acrylonitrile derivatives, YHO-13177and YHO-13351, reverse BCRP/ABCG2-mediated drug resistance in vitro and invivo.Mol Cancer Ther.2011,10(7):1252-63.
    [39]王伟,陈平,李军利,等.Tumstatin185-191逆转肺腺癌化疗耐药的机制探讨.中华肿瘤杂志,2009,31(8):577-581.
    [40]戚晓敏,单根法,张辅贤,等.川芎嗪逆转肺癌细胞株多药耐药性的研究,上海第二医科大学学报,2003,23(suppl):31-33.
    [41]刘小东.汉防己甲素衍生物W6和W18逆转肿瘤多药耐药及BrTet增强Bel7402细胞凋亡敏感性的作用机制研究.中国医学科学院北京协和医学院博士论文,2010年.
    [42]农丽,伍钢,戴晓芳等.吴茱萸碱逆转人肺癌细胞株A549/DDP耐药机理的实验研究.临床肿瘤学杂志,2010,15(6):487-492.
    [43]周知午,周于禄.异钩藤碱脂质体逆转人肺腺癌细胞A549/DDP对顺铂耐药的研究。湖南中医药大学学报,2008,28(3):29-31.
    [44]王江峰,周卸来,袁红等.丹参酮ⅡA对人肺癌细胞株A549/DDP细胞增殖和凋亡的影响,实用肿瘤杂志,2010,25(6):684-688.
    [45]高宝安,陈世雄,邓红艳.白花蛇舌草乙醇提取物对肺腺癌A549/DDP细胞的耐药逆转及其机制.时珍国医国药,2009,20(11):2714-2716.
    [46]吴剑锋.淫羊藿苷逆转耐氨甲喋呤肺癌A549细胞转移表型的研究.安徽医科大学2008级硕士论文,17-28.
    [47]吕品田,萧娟,周坤.薏苡仁注射液对肺腺癌细胞多药耐药性逆转作用的机制研究,中国全科医学,2010,13(9B):2956-2958.
    [48]张梅春,赵子文,曾军.姜黄素对耐顺铂人肺腺癌细胞Survivin表达及其化疗敏感性的影响.中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(19):1454-1457.
    [49]梁莉,刘叙仪,王洁.马蔺子素对耐顺铂人肺腺癌细胞系A549DDP耐药逆转及可能的机制.中华医学杂志,2001,81(22):1392-1393.
    [50]蒋亦燕,施畅,全世超.去甲斑蝥酸钠对耐顺铂人肺腺癌细胞系A549/DDP的逆转作用.肿瘤学杂志,2009,15(12):1088-1091.
    [51]罗素霞,陈小兵,李宁.非小细胞肺癌survivin表达与紫杉醇耐药的关系及苦参碱逆转耐药的研究.肿瘤研究与临床,2007,12:809-811.
    [52] Ma H,Yao Q,Zhang AM,et al. The effects of artesunate on the expression of EGFRand ABCG2in A549human lung cancer cells and a xenograft model.Molecules,2011,16(12):10556-69.
    [53] Chen J,Dexheimer TS,Ai Y,et al.Selective and cell-active inhibitors of the USP1/UAF1deubiquitinase complex reverse cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lungcancer cells.Chem Biol.201118(11):1390-400.
    [54]朱子清.贝母植物碱化学结构的研究.化学通报,1979,4:14-17.
    [55]陈丽华,刘丽丽,刘红宁等.LC-MS/MS法同时测定大鼠血浆中贝母素甲、贝母素乙的浓度及其在药代动力学中的应用,药学学报,2010,45(7):891-894.
    [56]杨庆,聂淑琴,翁小刚.乌头、贝母单用及配伍应用体内、外抗肿瘤作用的实验研究.中国实验方剂学杂志,2005,11(4):25-28.
    [57]王嵩,孙颖立,胡凯文.贝母甲素联合抗生素抑制多重抗生素耐药菌的实验研究.中国中西医结合杂志,2003,23(6):208-211.
    [58]胡凯文,郑洪霞,齐静等.浙贝母碱逆转白血病细胞多药耐药的研究.中华血液学杂志,1999,20(12):650-651.
    [59]梁蓉,杨平地.川芎嗪对自血病细胞株HL/60和K562的生长抑制反应.第四军医大学学报,1998;19(1):l08-109.
    [60]谢佐福,沈世人.川芎嗪和羟基脲对阿霉素K562细胞株DNA合成的影响.中华医学杂志,1993;73(9):559-560.
    [61]林洪生,李树奇,裴迎霞,等.川芎嗪、苦参碱对癌细胞与内皮细胞黏附及黏附因子表达的影响.中国新药杂志,1999,8(6):384.
    [62]魏志霞.川芎嗪对肝癌多药耐药株SMMC-7721/ADM的逆转作用.江苏医药,2005,31(5):371-372.
    [63]刘海峰,刘为纹.细胞凋亡与疾病.现代诊断与治疗,1996,7:218-220.
    [64] Kerr JER, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis:a basic biological phenomenon withwide ranging implication in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancre.1972,26:239.
    [65] Harris MH, Thompson CB The role of the Bcl-2family in the regulation of outermitochondria membrane permeability[J].Cell Death Differ,2000,7(12):1182-1191.
    [66]姚泰,罗自强,朱大年,等.生理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:406-407.
    [67] Falleni M,Pellegrini C,Marchetti A,et al. Survivin gene expression in early-stagenon-small cell lung cancer[J].J Pathol,2003,200(5):620-626.
    [68]李亚荣,郝杰,夏大文.小分子Survivin干扰RNA逆转肺癌细胞耐药的研究.中国实验诊断学,2011,15(3):407-410.
    [69] Juliano RL,Ling V.A surface glycoprotein modulating drug permeability in Chinesehamster ovary cell mutants.Biochem Biophys Acta,1976,455(1):152.
    [70] Roninson IB, Abelson HT, Housman DE, et al. Application of specific DNA sequencecorrelates with multidrug resistance in Chinese Hamster Cell[J].Nature,1984,309(5969):626-628.
    [71] Ueda K, Cornwell M,Gottoman DE,et al. The MDR1gene,responsible formultidrug-resistance, codes for P-protein[J]. Biophy Res Commun,1986,141(3):956-962.
    [72] Kool M,van der Linden M,de Haas M,etal.MRP3,an organic anion transporter ableto transport anti-cancer drugs.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1999,96(12):6914-6919.
    [73] Tan B, Piwnica-Worms D, Ratner L. Multidrug resistance transporters and modulation[J]. Curr Opin Oncol,2000,12(5):450-458.
    [74] Torky AR,Stehfest E,Viehweger K,et al.Immuno-histochemical detection of MRPs inhuman lung cells in culture[J].Toxicology.2005,207(3):437-450
    [75] Cole SPC, Bhardwaj G, Gerlach JH, et al. Overexpression of a transporter gene in amultidrug resistant human lung cancer cell line [J]. Science,1992,258(5088):1650-1654.
    [76] Young LC, Campling BG, Cole SP, et al. Multidrug resistance protein MRP3, MRP1and MRP in lung cancer:correlation of protein levels with drug response andmessenger RNA levels[J]. Clin Cancer Res,2001,7(6):1798-1804.
    [77] Scheper RJ,Broxterman HJ,Scheffer GL,et al.Overexpression of a Mr110000vesicular protein in non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance[J]. CancerRes,1993,53(7):1475-1479.
    [78] Izquierdo MA,Scheffer GL,Flens MJ,et al.Broad distribution of the multi-drugresistance related vault lung resistance Protein in normal human tissues andtumors[J].AM J Path,1996,148(3):877-887.
    [79]张梅春,胡成平.肺癌顺铂耐药的分子机制.国际呼吸杂志,2006,26(2):152-155.
    [80] Ko JC,Tsai MS,Kuo YH,et al.Modulation of Rad51,ERCC1,and thymidinephosphorylase by emodin result in synergistic cytotoxic effect in combination withcapecitabine[J].Biochem Pharmacol,2011,81(5):680-690.
    [81] Rosell R,Taron M,Obrate A. Predictive molecular markers in non-small cell lungcancer[J]. Curr Opin Oncol,2001,13(2):101-109.
    [82] Qiao G B,Wu Y L,Yang X N,et al. High-level expression of Rad51is anindependent prognostic marker of survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients[J]. Br J Cancer,2005,93(1):137-143.
    [83]林莉,刘晓晴,宋三泰.DNA损伤修复与铂类耐药研究进展[J].中国肿瘤,2006,15(1):29-31.
    [84] Okuda K, Sasaki H, Hikosaka Y,et al. Excision repair cross complementation group1polymorphisms predict overall survival after platinum-based chemotherapy forcompletely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Surg Res.2011,168(2):206-212.
    [85]宁晓红,王毓洲,孙昭. ERCC1对晚期非小细胞肺癌一线含铂化疗疗效的预测价值.协和医学杂志,2010,1(2):155-159.
    [1]张建兴.浙贝母新鲜鳞草化学成分的研究.中国中药杂志,1993,18(6):354.
    [2]朱子清.浙贝母的研究.复旦学报(自然科学版)1955,(1):99-101.
    [3]童志远,颜晓燕.贝母化学成分及质量控制方法研究进展.西南军医,2009,11(2):260-261.
    [4]张建兴,劳爱娜,黄慧珠,等.浙贝母化学成分的研究——Ⅲ.浙贝酮的分离和鉴定.药学学报,1992,27(6):472-475.
    [5]王文杰.贝母[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1990:203~213.
    [6]汪丽燕,韩传环,王萍.皖贝母与川贝母和浙贝母止咳、祛痰的药理作用比较[J].安徽医学,1993,14(3):57-58.
    [7]骆和生,王建华.中药方剂的药理与临床研究进展[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,1991:138-139.
    [8]周颖,季晖,李萍,等.五种贝母甾体生物碱对豚鼠离体气管条M受体的拮抗作用[J].中国药科大学学报,2003,34(1):58-60.
    [9]胡凯文,郑洪霞,齐静等.浙贝母碱逆转白血病细胞多药耐药的研究.中华血液学杂志,1999,20(12):650-651.
    [10]李伟,胡凯文,苏伟,等.浙贝母散剂逆转急性白血病多药耐药的临床研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2004,27(1):63-65.
    [11]杨庆,聂淑琴,翁小刚,等.乌头、贝母单用及配伍应用体内外抗肿瘤作用的实验研究[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2005,11(4):25-28.
    [12]李仝,胡凯文,陈信义,等.浙贝母对呼吸系统耐药金黄色葡萄球菌逆转作用的临床研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2001,24(5):51-52.
    [13]王嵩,孙颖立,胡凯文.贝母甲素联合抗生素抑制多重抗生素耐药菌的实验研究.中国中西医结合杂志,2003,23(6):208-211.
    [14]张明发,沈雅琴,朱自平,等.辛温(热)合归脾胃经中药药性研究(Ⅳ)镇痛作用[J].中药药理与临床,1996,12(4):1-4.
    [15]张明发,沈雅琴,朱自平,等.辛温(热)合归脾胃经中药药性研究(Ⅲ)抗炎作用[J].中药药理与临床,1998,14(6):12-16.
    [16]张明发,沈雅琴,朱自平.浙贝母的抗溃疡和镇痛作用.西北药学杂志,1998,13(5):208-209.
    [17] L i Y,Xu C,ZhangQ,et al. In vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori action of30Chineseherbal medicines used to treat ulcer diseases[J]. J Ethnopharmacol,2005,98(3):329-333.
    [18]肖灿鹏,赵浩如,李萍,等.中药贝母几种主要成分的体外抗菌活性[J].中国药科大学学报,1992,23(3):188-189.
    [19]王理达,胡迎庆,屠鹏飞,等.13种生药提取物及化学成分的抗真菌活性筛选[J].中草药,2001,32(3):241-243.
    [20]张明发,沈雅琴,朱自平,等.辛温(热)合归脾胃经中药药性研究(Ⅴ)抗腹泻作用[J].中药药理与临床,1997,13(5):2-5.
    [21] Oh H, Kang DG, Lee S, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme(ACE) inhibitoryalkaloids from Fritillaria ussuriesis[J]. PlantaMed,2003,69(6):564-565.
    [22]肖志杰,黄华,曾春华,等.附子配伍贝母对大鼠心功能的影响[J].江西中医学院学报,2005,17(2):50-51.
    [23]蒋文跃,杨宇,李燕燕.化痰药半夏、瓜篓、浙贝母、石菖蒲对大鼠血液流变性的影响[J].中医杂志,2002,43(3):215-216.
    [24]张明发,沈雅琴,朱自平,等.辛温(热)合归脾胃经中药药性研究(Ⅵ)抗血栓形成和抗凝作用[J].中国中药杂志,1997,22(11):691-693.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700