晚三叠世至中侏罗世中扬子区陆相磨拉石前陆盆地充填序列
|
摘要
为全面系统建立中扬子及其邻区晚三叠世至中侏罗世三级层序地层格架,以及摸清沉积相迁移展布规律、沉积古地理演化格局和确定中扬子盆地性质等沉积学问题,以达到对晚印支—早燕山中扬子沉积盆地的较全面认识,为扬子板块和秦岭—大别山造山带组成的盆山体系演化提供重要的沉积学线索,进一步丰富该区大地构造学、沉积学、盆地分析和油气成藏等学科理论体系,同时对中扬子油气资源勘探也具有指导意义。以露头、钻井、测井和古生物等资料为基础,应用现代沉积学理论和陆相层序地层学原理,划分和对比晚三叠世至中侏罗世中扬子及其邻区沉积盆地三级层序地层,以及研究其沉积相(微相)、物源、沉积—构造古地理、盆地性质等方面的特征,得出以下一些结论:①通过对三级层序界面识别,可将晚三叠世至中侏罗世中扬子盆地充填序列共划分为12个三级层序。其中上三叠统大致可识别出3个三级层序T_3S_1、T_3S_2和T_3S_3,下侏罗统可划分为3个三级层序J_1S_1、J_1S_2和J_1S_3,而中侏罗统可识别出6个三级层序J_2S_1、J_2S_2、J_2S_3、J_2S_4、J_2S_5和J_2S_6,部分分区因地层缺失而只能识别出更少的三级层序,不同的三级层序或不同地区的同一三级层序的沉积特征存在一定的差异;②晚三叠世沉积体系主要为一套网状河+曲流河及其三角洲和残留陆表海(湖泊)组成的沉积相组合。而早、中侏罗世主要为曲流河+辫状河及其三角洲和新生湖泊沉积相组合,其中辫状河体系占主导,局部发育冲积体系和扇三角洲体系;③印支晚期在中扬子北缘陆壳向北俯冲碰撞的挠曲沉降作用下,中扬子前陆盆地及其邻区具有相对稳定的古地理背景,沉降沉积主体中心位于中扬子北缘秭归盆地和荆当盆地及西缘分区,地势上具东高西低、南高北低的特征,曲流河及其三角洲和残留湖泊相组合占主导,而网状河体系组合仅分布于鄂东盆地和荆当盆地。而燕山早期中扬子及其邻区除继续受北缘俯冲作用的影响外,还受控于中扬子陆内强烈的挤压变形,存在多沉降沉积中心且沉降幅度更大,区内地势地貌更为复杂,除鄂东盆地和西缘邻区为曲流河体系组合以及南缘为冲积体系或扇三角洲外,中扬子前陆盆地其它各分区沉积体系为占主导的辫状河及其三角洲和新生湖泊沉积相组合;④依据中扬子沉积—构造特征,将晚三叠世至中侏罗世中扬子盆地厘定为陆相磨拉石前陆沉积盆地;
To establish 3~(rd)-order sequence stratum framework fully and systematically, and to make clear sedimentological issues about sedimentary facies distribution and migration, palaegeographical background and evolvement, and the basin attribution for Middle Yangtze and its adjacent areas from Late Triassic to Mid Jurassic, some studies have been determined and worked on. The results are useful for comprehensive understanding of Middle Yangtze Basin from Late Indosinian to Early Yanshanian, and provide important sedimentological clues for further research in basin-orogen evolvement of Yangtze and Qinling-Dabieshan system, and enrich geological theory such as Tectonics, Sedimentology, Basin Analysis and Hydrocarbon Reservoir Forming, meanwhile, the results are guidance for Middle Yangtze hydrocarbon prospecting. On the base of information from outcrops, well drilling, well logging and paleontology and under the guidance of principles from Modern Sedimentology and Continental Sequence Stratigraphy, 3~(rd)-order sequence strata are divided and correlated, and the sedimentary facies(sub-facies), provenance, sediment-tectonic paleogeography and basin attribution are analyzed and studied for Middle Yangtze and its adjacent from Late Triassic to Mid Jurassic. The conclusions and results are showed as following:①By identification the third-order sequence stratum boundaries, the Middle Yangtze Basin sedimentary filling sequence from Late Triassic and Early Jurassic can be totally divided into 12 third-order sequence stratum units, in which the 3 of T3S1, T3S2 and T3S3 belongs to Upper Triassic, and the 3 of J_1S_1, J_1S_2 , J_1S_3 and the 6 of J_2S_1, J_2S_2, J_2S_3, J_2S_4, J_2S_5, J_2S_6 belong to Lower Jurassic and Mid Jurassic respectively, but some subareas in Middle Yangtze and its adjacent get less 3~(rd)-order sequence stratum units because of stratigraphic lacunae. The sequence sedimentary features are different from one to one and from subarea to subarea;②The Late Triassic sedimentary system is characteristic by the sedimentary facies assemblage of Anastomosing River + Meandering River and their Delta + Residue Lake, while the Lower and Mid Jurassic is characteristic by the assemblage of Braided River +Meandering River and their Delta + Newly Lake, which the Braided River system is dominant, and Alluvial system or Fan-Delta system develops partly;③On the influence of flexuring subsidence resulted from subduction to north of Middle Yangtze North Edge, the Middle Yangtze Foreland Basin and its adjacent in Late Triassic keeps a stable paleogeographic background and the center of subsidence and sediment locates in the north edge such as Zigui Basin and Jingdang Basin, and also west edge. The physiognomy is characteristic by“higher east and lower west, higher south and lower north”and the sedimentary system is dominated by Meandering River and its Delta + Residue Lake, while Anastomosing River system distributes in Edong Basin and Jingdang Basin only. Except the impact of flexuring subsidence which has the same mechanism with that in Late Triassic, the Middle Yangtze Area in Early Indosinian is controlled by inland strong compression and deforming, so it has some different centers of subsidence and sediment and has diversiform and complicated physiognomy. During this period, the foreland basin sedimentary system is dominated by assemblage of Braided River and its Delta + Newly Lake, while Meandering assemblage distributes in Edong Basin and Adjacent of West-Edge, and Alluvial system and Fan-Delta system exists in the South Edge;④By analysis Sedimentology and Tectonic features, Middle Yangtze Basin from Late Triassic to Mid Jurassic is a Continental Molasse Foreland Sedimentary Basin probably.
To establish 3~(rd)-order sequence stratum framework fully and systematically, and to make clear sedimentological issues about sedimentary facies distribution and migration, palaegeographical background and evolvement, and the basin attribution for Middle Yangtze and its adjacent areas from Late Triassic to Mid Jurassic, some studies have been determined and worked on. The results are useful for comprehensive understanding of Middle Yangtze Basin from Late Indosinian to Early Yanshanian, and provide important sedimentological clues for further research in basin-orogen evolvement of Yangtze and Qinling-Dabieshan system, and enrich geological theory such as Tectonics, Sedimentology, Basin Analysis and Hydrocarbon Reservoir Forming, meanwhile, the results are guidance for Middle Yangtze hydrocarbon prospecting. On the base of information from outcrops, well drilling, well logging and paleontology and under the guidance of principles from Modern Sedimentology and Continental Sequence Stratigraphy, 3~(rd)-order sequence strata are divided and correlated, and the sedimentary facies(sub-facies), provenance, sediment-tectonic paleogeography and basin attribution are analyzed and studied for Middle Yangtze and its adjacent from Late Triassic to Mid Jurassic. The conclusions and results are showed as following:①By identification the third-order sequence stratum boundaries, the Middle Yangtze Basin sedimentary filling sequence from Late Triassic and Early Jurassic can be totally divided into 12 third-order sequence stratum units, in which the 3 of T3S1, T3S2 and T3S3 belongs to Upper Triassic, and the 3 of J_1S_1, J_1S_2 , J_1S_3 and the 6 of J_2S_1, J_2S_2, J_2S_3, J_2S_4, J_2S_5, J_2S_6 belong to Lower Jurassic and Mid Jurassic respectively, but some subareas in Middle Yangtze and its adjacent get less 3~(rd)-order sequence stratum units because of stratigraphic lacunae. The sequence sedimentary features are different from one to one and from subarea to subarea;②The Late Triassic sedimentary system is characteristic by the sedimentary facies assemblage of Anastomosing River + Meandering River and their Delta + Residue Lake, while the Lower and Mid Jurassic is characteristic by the assemblage of Braided River +Meandering River and their Delta + Newly Lake, which the Braided River system is dominant, and Alluvial system or Fan-Delta system develops partly;③On the influence of flexuring subsidence resulted from subduction to north of Middle Yangtze North Edge, the Middle Yangtze Foreland Basin and its adjacent in Late Triassic keeps a stable paleogeographic background and the center of subsidence and sediment locates in the north edge such as Zigui Basin and Jingdang Basin, and also west edge. The physiognomy is characteristic by“higher east and lower west, higher south and lower north”and the sedimentary system is dominated by Meandering River and its Delta + Residue Lake, while Anastomosing River system distributes in Edong Basin and Jingdang Basin only. Except the impact of flexuring subsidence which has the same mechanism with that in Late Triassic, the Middle Yangtze Area in Early Indosinian is controlled by inland strong compression and deforming, so it has some different centers of subsidence and sediment and has diversiform and complicated physiognomy. During this period, the foreland basin sedimentary system is dominated by assemblage of Braided River and its Delta + Newly Lake, while Meandering assemblage distributes in Edong Basin and Adjacent of West-Edge, and Alluvial system and Fan-Delta system exists in the South Edge;④By analysis Sedimentology and Tectonic features, Middle Yangtze Basin from Late Triassic to Mid Jurassic is a Continental Molasse Foreland Sedimentary Basin probably.
引文
Allen P A, Homewood P, Williams G D. Foreland basins: An introduction. International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication, 1986, 8: 3~12
Brian G, Ruskin, Teresa E, et al. Climate change across continental sequence boundaries: paleopedology and lithofacies of Iglesia Basin, Northwestern Argentina. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 661~679
Catuneanu O, Willis A, Miall A D. Temporal significance of sequence boundaries. Sedimentary Geology, 1998, 121: 157~178
Colin P, North, Gail L, et al. Fluvial fans: Myths, misconceptions, and the end of the terminal-fan model. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 693~701
Cross T A, Homewood P W. Amanz gressly’s role in founding modern stratigraphy. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 1997, 109: 1617~1630
Cross T A, Lessenger M A. Sediment volume partitioning: rationale for stratigraphic model evaluation and high-resolution stratigraphic correlation. In: Gradstein F M, Sandvik K O, Milton N J, eds. Sequence Stratigraphy Concepts and Applications. NPF Special Publication, 1998, 8: 171~195
David M, Cleveland, Stacy C, et al. Continental sequence stratigraphy of the upper Triassic(Norian-Rhaetian) Chinle Strata, Northern New Mexico, U.S.A.: Allocyclic and autocyclic origins of paleosol-bearing alluvial successions. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 909~924
Dickinson W R. Exxon global cycle chart: an event for every occasion: Comments and Reply. Geology, 1993, 3: 282~283
Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation. In: Dicksinson W R, eds. Tectonics and Sedimentation. Tulsa: SEPM Special Publication, 1974: 1~27
Embry A F, Johannessen E P. T-R sequence stratigraphy, facies analysis and reservoir distribution in the uppermost Triassic-Lower Jurassic succession, western Sverdrup Basin, Arctic Canada. In: Vorren T, Bergsager E, Dahl-Stamnes O A, et al. eds. Arctic Geology and Petroleum Potential. NPF Special Publication 2, 1992,121~146
Embry A F. Atectonic origin for third-order depositional sequences in extensional basins-implications for basin modeling. In: Cross T A, eds. Quantitative Dynamic Stratigraphy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990, 491~550
Embry A F. Transgressive-regressive(T-R) sequence analysis of the Jurassic succession of the Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1993, 30: 301~320
Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysisⅠ: Architecture and genesis of flooding-surface bounded depositional units. Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 1989, 73: 125~142
Gresley A, Wakelin-King, John A, et al. Upper-flow-regime mud floodplains, lower-flow-regime sand channels: Sediment transport and deposition in a drylands mud-aggregate river. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 702~712
Hadler-Jacobsen F, Johannessen E, Ashton N, et al. Submarine fan morphology and lithology distribution: a predictable function of sediment delivery, gross shelf to basin relief, slope gradient and basin topography. In: Dore A, Vining B, eds. Petroleum Geology: Northwest Europe and global perspectives. 2005, 1121~1145
Haq B U, Hardenbol J, Vail P R. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic(250 million years ago to present). Science, 1987, 235: 1156~1167
Hunt D, Tucker M. Stranded parasequences and the forced regressive wedge systems tract: deposition during base level fall. Sedimentary Geology, 1992, 81: 1~9
Jervey M. Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequences and their seismic expression. In: Wilgus C, Hastings B S, Kendall C G, Posamentier H W, Ross C A, Van Wagoner J C, eds. Sea level changes: An integrated approach. SEPM Spec., 1988, 42: 47~69
Jervey M. Siliciclastic sequence development in foreland basins, with examples from the western Canada Foreland Basin. In: Macqueen R, Leckie D, eds. Foreland Basins and Fold Belts. AAPG memoir, 1992, 55: 47~80
Keith W, Shanlley K W, Peter J. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4): 544~568
Mellere D, Plink-Borklund P, Steel R. Anatomy of shelf deltas at the edge of a prograding Eocene shelf margin, Spitsbergen. Sedimentology, 2002, 49: 1181~1206
Miall A D. Empiricism and model building in stratigraphy: the historical roots of present-day practices. Stratigraphy, 2004, 1: 3~25
Miall A D. Stratigraphic sequences and chronostratigraphic correlation. Jour. Sed. Petrol, 1991, 61: 497~505
Miall A D. The geology of fluvial deposits. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1996, 1~524
Mitchum R, Vail P, Thompson S. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level, part 2: the depositional sequence as the basic unit for stratigraphic analysis. In: Payton C., eds. Seismic stratigraphy: application to hydrocarbon exploration: AAPG Memoir 26, 1977, 53~62
Partington M, Mitchener B, Milton N, et al. Genetic sequence stratigraphy for the North Sea Late Jurassic and early Cretaceous: distribution and prediction of Kimmeridgian-late Ryazanian reservoirs in the North Sea and adjacent areas. In: Parker J, eds. Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe, 1993, 4: 327~370
Philip J, Ashworth, James L, et al. The relationship between channel avulsion, flow occupancy and aggradation in braided rivers: insights from an experimental model. Sedimentology, 2007, 54: 497~513
Posamentier H, Jervey M, Vail P. Eustatic controls on clastic deposition I conceptual framework, In: Wilgus C, Hastings B S, Kendall C G, Posamentier H W, Ross C A and Van Wagoner J C, eds. Sea level changes: an integrated approach. SEPM Spec., 1988, 42: 109~124
Posamentier H, Vail P. Eustatic controls on clastic deposition II-sequence and systems tract models, In: Wilgus C, Hastings B S, Kendall C G, Posamentier H W, Ross C A, Van Wagoner, J C. eds. Sea level changes: an integrated approach. SEPM Spec., 1988, 42: 125~154
Schwarzacher W. Cyclostratigraphy and Milankovitch theory. Development inSedimentology, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1993, 52
Shanley K W, McCabe P J. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78: 544~568
Shanley K W. Alluvial architecture in a sequence stratigraphy framework. Journal of Geology, 1994, 102(2): 105~109
Shanley K W. River response to base-level changes: Implication for sequence stratigraphy. Journal of Geology, 1993, 101(3): 279~294
Sinclair H D.黄腾,译.周缘前陆盆地中复理石向磨拉石的转换——被动大陆边缘对板块破裂的作用.地质科学译丛, 1998, 15(2): 32~38
Sloss L, Krumbein W, Dapples E. Integrated facies analysis, In: Longwell C, eds. Sedimentary facies in geologic history. Geological Society America Memoir, 1949, 39: 91~124
Sloss L. Sequences in the cratonic interior of North America. GSA Bulletin, 1963, 74: 93~113
Vail P, Audemard F, Bowman S A, et al. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustasy and sedimentology-an overview. In: Einsele G, Richen W, Seilacher A, eds. Cycles and events in stratigraphy, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991, 617~659
Vail P. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level. In: Payton C, eds. Seismic stratigraphy: applications to hydrocarbon exploration. AAPG Memoir, 1977, 26: 49~212
Vail P. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. PartⅠ: Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure. In: Bally A W, eds. Atlas of sesmic stratigraphy. AAPG, Studies in Geology, 1987, 27: 1~10
Vail P. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustasy and sedimentology an overview. In: Einsele G, et al. eds. Cycles and events in stratigraphy. New York: Springer Verlag, 1991
Van Wagoner J C, Bertram G T. Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basin deposits-outcrop and subsurface examples from the Cretaceous of North America. AAPG Memoir, 1995, 64
Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum H M, Campion K M, et al. Silisiclastic seguence stratigraphyin well logs, cores and outcrops: concepts for high-resolution correlation of time and facies. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 1990, 7: 1~5
Wheeler H E, Murray H. Base level control patterns in cyclothemic sedimentation. AAPG Bulletin, 1957, 41: 1985~2011
Wheeler H E. Base level, lithosphere surface and time stratigraphy. Geological Society America Bulletin, 1964, 75: 599~610
陈发景,汪新文,陈昭年,等.前陆盆地分析.北京:地质出版社, 2007
陈发景,汪新文,张光亚,等.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学.地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 1996 , 21(4): 366~372
陈洪德,庞林,倪新锋,等.中上扬子地区海相油气勘探前景.石油实验地质, 2007, 29(1): 13~18
陈留勤,段凯波,霍荣,等.晚三叠世中扬子北缘前陆盆地层序地层特征及沉积演化.高校地质学报, 2009, 15(3): 328~338
陈书平,汤良杰,张一伟.前陆、前陆盆地和前陆盆地系统,世界地质, 2001, 20(4): 332~338
崔永刚等.构造对三级层序的控制作用.地层学杂志, 2007, 31(2): 179~183
戴朝成,郑荣才,朱如凯,等.四川类前陆盆地须家河组震积岩的发现及其研究意义.地球科学进展, 2009, 24(2): 172~180
戴少武.中扬子及邻区层序地层与原型盆地演化.石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(3): 229~235
邓宏文,李熙哲.层序地层地层基准面的识别,对比技术及应用.石油与天然气地质, 1996, 17(3): 177~184
邓宏文,王红亮.沉积物体积分配原理——高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础.地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 305~313
邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派——高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质, 1995, 16(2): 89~97
丁道桂,郭彤楼,胡明霞,等.论江南—雪峰基底拆离式构造——南方构造问题之一.石油实验地质, 2007, 29(2): 120~132
丁道桂,潘文蕾,彭金宁,等.扬子板块中、古生代盆地的改造变形.石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(5): 597~606
董清水,刘招君,方石,等.论陆相层序地层学四分方案的可行性.沉积学报, 2003, 21(2): 324~327
董云鹏,张国伟.造山带与前陆盆地结构构造及动力学研究思路和进展.地球科学进展, 1997, 12(1): 1~6
杜小弟,左权,刘万洙.前陆盆地的识别及形成演化.世界地质, 1994, 13(3): 11~14
段凯波,陈留勤.鄂东地区中侏罗统陆相层序地层及其主控因素.大庆石油学院学报, 2011, 35(1): 15~20
段凯波,段东生,陈留勤,等.微生物碳酸盐岩研究进展及存在的问题.西北地质, 2008, 41(1): 44~49
樊太亮,李庆谋.沉积基准面变化分析技术及其应用.石油与天然气地质, 1997, 18(2): 108~114
方石,蔡尧忠.河流相层序地层学研究.世界地质, 2000, 19(2): 132~13
付宜兴,张萍,李志祥,等.中扬子区构造特征及勘探方向建议.大地构造与成矿学, 2007, 31(3): 308~314
高长林,叶德燎,钱一雄.前陆盆地的类型及油气远景.石油实验地质, 2000, 22(2): 99~104
顾家裕,张兴阳.陆相层序地层学进展与在油气勘探开发中的应用.石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(5): 484~490
顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式.石油勘探与开发, 1995, 22(4): 6~10
贵州省地质矿产局.贵州省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1987: 1~698
郭令智,朱文斌,马瑞士,等.论构造耦合作用.大地构造与成矿学, 2003, 27(3): 197~205
郭巍,刘招君,董清水,等.断陷湖盆层序地层格架中的油气聚焦规律——以松辽盆地为例.吉林大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 32(3): 233~237
郭旭升,梅廉夫,汤济广,等.扬子地块中、新生代构造演化对海相油气成藏的制约.石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(3): 295~304
郝杰,李曰俊.磨拉石与造山旋回.湖南地质, 1994, 13(3): 186~189
胡受权.湖平面变化及物源供给对陆相层序影响机理的计算机模拟.断块油气田, 2000, 7(6): 1~4
湖北省地质矿产局.湖北省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1990: 1~710
湖南省地质矿产局.湖南省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1988: 1~718
贾承造.前陆冲断带油气勘探.北京:石油工业出版社, 2000: 1~351
贾进华.库车前陆盆地白垩纪巴什基奇克组沉积层序与储层研究.地学前缘, 2000, 7(3) : 133~144
焦文放,吴元保,彭敏,等.扬子板块最古老岩石的锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素组成.中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2009, 39(7): 972~978
解习农,李思田.陆相盆地层序地层学研究特点.地质科学情报, 1993, 12(1): 22~26
李丕龙,金之钧,张善文,等.济阳坳陷油气勘探现状及主要研究进展.石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(3): 1~4
李曙光, Hart S R,郑双根,等.中国华北、华南陆块碰撞时代的钐—钕同位素年龄证据.
中国科学B辑, 1989, 3: 312~319
李思田,杨士恭.论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报, 1992, 10(4): 11~22
李思田.论沉积盆地分析领域的追踪与创新.沉积学报, 1992, 10(3): 10~15
李忠,李任伟,孙枢.大别山中生代构造演化:来自盆地充填记录的启示.地质通报, 2002, 21(8-9): 547~553
林畅松,李思田,任建业.断陷湖盆层序地层研究和计算机模拟——以二连盆地乌里雅斯太断陷为例.地学前缘, 1995, 2(3-4): 124~132
林畅松,张燕梅.高精度层序地层学和储层预测.地学前缘, 2000, 7(3): 111~117
林畅松.沉积盆地的构造地层分析——以中国构造活动盆地研究为例.现代地质, 2006, 20(2): 185~194
刘池洋,赵红格,杨兴科,等.前陆盆地及其确定和研究.石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(4): 307~313
刘光鼎.中国海大地构造演化.石油与天然气地质, 1990, 11(1): 23~29
刘少峰,李思田.前陆盆地形成的力学机制.地球科学, 1996, 21(1): 57~62
刘少峰,张国伟,程顺有.东秦岭—大别山及邻区挠曲类盆地演化与碰撞造山过程.地球科学, 1999, 34(3): 336~346
刘少峰,张国伟.盆山关系研究的基本思路、内容和方法.地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京); 北京大学), 2005, 12(3): 101~111
刘树根,罗志立.从华南板块构造演化探讨中国南方油气藏分布的规律性.石油学报,2001, 22(4): 24~31
刘细元,钟达洪,袁建芽,等.扬子板块与华南板块对接带萍乡区段构造特征.地质力学学报, 2004, 10(4): 372~379
刘新民,付宜兴,郭战峰.等,中扬子区南华纪以来盆地演化与油气响应特征.石油实验地质, 2009, 31(2): 160~165
刘新民,郭战峰,付宜兴.中扬子区东南缘下组合天然气勘探潜力分析.华南地质与矿产, 2007, 1: 59~64
刘贻军.前陆盆地层序地层学研究中的几个问题.地球学报, 1998, 19(1): 90~96
刘云生,郭战峰,梁西文,等.中上扬子地区晚三叠世—侏罗纪砂岩构造意义及盆山耦合关系.石油实验地质, 2006, 28(3): 201~205
刘志丽,童金南.中国南方中三叠世地层及沉积古地理分异.沉积学报, 2001, 19(3): 327~332
吕红华,周祖翼.前陆盆地陆源沉积序列的特征与成因机制.地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7): 706~714
梅廉夫,戴少武,沈传波,等.中、下扬子区中、新生代陆内对冲带的形成及解体.地质科技情报, 2008, 27(4): 1~7
梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.滇黔桂盆地及邻区二叠系乐平统层序地层格架及其古地理背景.中国科学D辑, 2007, 37(5): 605~617
梅冥相,马永生.雾迷山旋回层的基本相序模式—兼论其马尔柯夫链分析及在长周期三级层序中的有序叠加形式.地质学报, 2001, 075(004): 476~476
梅冥相,徐德斌.沉积地层旋回性记录中几个理论问题的认识:兼论“露头层序地层”的工作方法.现代地质, 1996, 10(1): 85~92
梅冥相,徐德斌.米级旋回层序的成因类型及其相序结构特征.沉积学报, 2000, 18(1): 4~49
梅冥相.中上扬子印支运动的地层学效应及晚三叠世沉积盆地格局.地学前缘, 2010, 17(4): 99~111
牟传龙.从被动边缘到前陆盆地的演化模式——兼论前陆盆地的控矿作用.岩相古地理, 1990, 2: 56~62
倪新锋,陈洪德,田景春,等.陆相层序地层学理论体系及发展趋势.沉积与特提斯地质, 2002, 22(4): 35~42
倪新锋,陈洪德,韦东晓,等.中上扬子盆地叠加、改造类型及油气勘探前景.地质学报, 2009, 83(4): 468~477
四川省地质矿产局.四川省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1991: 1~730
宋传中,张国伟,任升莲,等.秦岭—大别造山带中几条重要构造带的特征及其意义.西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 39(3): 368~380
汪建国,陈代钊,王清晨,等.中扬子地区晚震旦世—早寒武世转折期台—盆演化及烃源岩形成机理.地质学报, 2007, 81(8): 1102~1109
汪新伟,沃玉进,张荣强.扬子克拉通南华纪—早古生代的构造—沉积旋回.现代地质, 2008, 22(4): 525~533
汪泽成,刘和甫,熊宝贤,等.从前陆盆地充填地层分析盆山耦合关系.地球科学, 2001, 26(1): 33~39
王鹤年,周丽娅.华南地质构造的再认识.高校地质学报, 2006, 12(4): 457~465
王鸿祯,史晓颖.沉积层序及海平面旋回的分类级别:旋回周期的成因讨论.现代地质, 1998, 12(1): 1~16
王华,吴巧生,李绍虎,等.前陆盆地类型及其沉积动力学研究综述.地质科技情报, 1998, 17(3): 12~18
王家豪,陈红汉,王华,等.前陆盆地二级层序内可容纳空间发育演化及三级层序对比. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2005, 30(2): 140~146
王清晨,蔡立国.中国南方显生宙大地构造演化简史.地质学报, 2007, 81(8): 1025~1040
王训练.从综合地层学的观点论确定全球界线层型剖面点(GSSP)的步骤和方法.中国科学(D辑)地球科学, 2002, 32(5): 358~367
魏魁生,徐怀大.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋集.地球科学, 1993, 18(2): 139~149
魏魁生,徐怀大.冀中地区早第三纪海泛特征及其层序地层学意义.现代地质, 1993, 7(3): 274~284
沃玉进,汪新伟.中、上扬子地区地质结构类型与海相层系油气保存意义.石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(2): 177~187
吴冲龙,杜远生,梅廉夫,等.中国南方印支—燕山期复合盆山体系与盆地原型改造.石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(3): 305~315
夏邦栋,方中,吕洪波,等.磨拉石与全球构造.石油实验地质, 1989, 11(4): 314~318
夏邦栋,方中,于津海.近源与远源磨拉石与造山带.科学通报, 1988, 9: 687~689
夏文臣,周杰,袁伟,等.华南晚三叠世前陆盆地的成因地层格架及演化历史.地球科学, 1994, 19(1): 19~30
徐怀大.层序地层学理论用于我国断陷盆地分析中的问题.石油与天然气地质, 1991, 12(1): 52~57
徐强,姜烨,董伟良,等.中国层序地层研究现状和发展方向.沉积学报, 2003, 21(1): 155~162
徐亚军,杜远生,杨江海.沉积物物源分析研究进展.地质科技情报, 2007, 26(3): 26~32
徐政语,林舸.中扬子地区显生宙构造演化及其对油气系统的影响.大地构造与成矿学, 2001, 25(1): 1~8
许志琴,卢一伦,汤耀庆,等.东秦岭造山带的变形特征及构造演化.地质学报, 1986, 3: 237~247
闫小雄,周立发.前陆盆地层序地层学研究现状及进展.沉积与特提斯地质, 2001, 21(3): 60~64
颜丹平,宋鸿林,傅昭仁.扬子地台西缘造山前的区域伸展作用研究.地学前缘, 1999, 6(4): 1
颜佳新,赵坤.二叠—三叠纪东特提斯地区古地理、古气候和古海洋演化与地球表层多圈层事件藕合.中国科学D辑, 2002, 32(9): 751~759
杨经绥,许志琴,马昌前,等.复合造山作用和中国中央造山带的科学问题.中国地质, 2010, 37(1): 1~11
张传恒,王自强,贾维民.论造山运动的时间特征.地质学报, 1997, 71(1): 18~26
张国伟,董云鹏,赖绍聪.秦岭—大别造山带南缘勉略构造带与勉略缝合带.中国科学D辑, 2003, 33(12): 1121~1135
张国伟,柳小明.关于“中央造山带”几个问题的思考.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 1998, (23)5: 443~448
张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚,等.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学.北京:科学出版社, 2001: 1~855
张明利,金之钧,汤良杰,等.前陆盆地研究的回顾与展望.地质论评, 2002, 48(2): 214~220
赵玉光,许效松,刘宝珺.克拉通边缘前陆盆地动力层序地层学.岩相古地理, 1997,17(1): 1~10
赵宗举,朱琰,李大成,等.中国南方构造形变对油气藏的控制作用.石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(1): 19~23
郑荣才,戴朝成,朱如凯,等.四川类前陆盆地须家河组层序—岩相古地理特征.地质论评, 2009 , 55(4): 484~495
郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义.沉积学报, 2001, 19(2): 249~255
郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析.沉积学报, 2000, 18(3): 369~374
周雁,陈洪德,王成善,等.中扬子区海相地层层序样式及其油气地质意义.成都理工学院学报, 2002, 29(1): 26~30
周总瑛,蒋泰然,吴乃荃.前陆盆地挠曲沉降定量分析.石油地球物理勘探, 1996, 31(5): 699~703
Brian G, Ruskin, Teresa E, et al. Climate change across continental sequence boundaries: paleopedology and lithofacies of Iglesia Basin, Northwestern Argentina. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 661~679
Catuneanu O, Willis A, Miall A D. Temporal significance of sequence boundaries. Sedimentary Geology, 1998, 121: 157~178
Colin P, North, Gail L, et al. Fluvial fans: Myths, misconceptions, and the end of the terminal-fan model. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 693~701
Cross T A, Homewood P W. Amanz gressly’s role in founding modern stratigraphy. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 1997, 109: 1617~1630
Cross T A, Lessenger M A. Sediment volume partitioning: rationale for stratigraphic model evaluation and high-resolution stratigraphic correlation. In: Gradstein F M, Sandvik K O, Milton N J, eds. Sequence Stratigraphy Concepts and Applications. NPF Special Publication, 1998, 8: 171~195
David M, Cleveland, Stacy C, et al. Continental sequence stratigraphy of the upper Triassic(Norian-Rhaetian) Chinle Strata, Northern New Mexico, U.S.A.: Allocyclic and autocyclic origins of paleosol-bearing alluvial successions. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 909~924
Dickinson W R. Exxon global cycle chart: an event for every occasion: Comments and Reply. Geology, 1993, 3: 282~283
Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation. In: Dicksinson W R, eds. Tectonics and Sedimentation. Tulsa: SEPM Special Publication, 1974: 1~27
Embry A F, Johannessen E P. T-R sequence stratigraphy, facies analysis and reservoir distribution in the uppermost Triassic-Lower Jurassic succession, western Sverdrup Basin, Arctic Canada. In: Vorren T, Bergsager E, Dahl-Stamnes O A, et al. eds. Arctic Geology and Petroleum Potential. NPF Special Publication 2, 1992,121~146
Embry A F. Atectonic origin for third-order depositional sequences in extensional basins-implications for basin modeling. In: Cross T A, eds. Quantitative Dynamic Stratigraphy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990, 491~550
Embry A F. Transgressive-regressive(T-R) sequence analysis of the Jurassic succession of the Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1993, 30: 301~320
Galloway W E. Genetic stratigraphic sequences in basin analysisⅠ: Architecture and genesis of flooding-surface bounded depositional units. Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists, 1989, 73: 125~142
Gresley A, Wakelin-King, John A, et al. Upper-flow-regime mud floodplains, lower-flow-regime sand channels: Sediment transport and deposition in a drylands mud-aggregate river. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77: 702~712
Hadler-Jacobsen F, Johannessen E, Ashton N, et al. Submarine fan morphology and lithology distribution: a predictable function of sediment delivery, gross shelf to basin relief, slope gradient and basin topography. In: Dore A, Vining B, eds. Petroleum Geology: Northwest Europe and global perspectives. 2005, 1121~1145
Haq B U, Hardenbol J, Vail P R. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic(250 million years ago to present). Science, 1987, 235: 1156~1167
Hunt D, Tucker M. Stranded parasequences and the forced regressive wedge systems tract: deposition during base level fall. Sedimentary Geology, 1992, 81: 1~9
Jervey M. Quantitative geological modeling of siliciclastic rock sequences and their seismic expression. In: Wilgus C, Hastings B S, Kendall C G, Posamentier H W, Ross C A, Van Wagoner J C, eds. Sea level changes: An integrated approach. SEPM Spec., 1988, 42: 47~69
Jervey M. Siliciclastic sequence development in foreland basins, with examples from the western Canada Foreland Basin. In: Macqueen R, Leckie D, eds. Foreland Basins and Fold Belts. AAPG memoir, 1992, 55: 47~80
Keith W, Shanlley K W, Peter J. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78(4): 544~568
Mellere D, Plink-Borklund P, Steel R. Anatomy of shelf deltas at the edge of a prograding Eocene shelf margin, Spitsbergen. Sedimentology, 2002, 49: 1181~1206
Miall A D. Empiricism and model building in stratigraphy: the historical roots of present-day practices. Stratigraphy, 2004, 1: 3~25
Miall A D. Stratigraphic sequences and chronostratigraphic correlation. Jour. Sed. Petrol, 1991, 61: 497~505
Miall A D. The geology of fluvial deposits. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1996, 1~524
Mitchum R, Vail P, Thompson S. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level, part 2: the depositional sequence as the basic unit for stratigraphic analysis. In: Payton C., eds. Seismic stratigraphy: application to hydrocarbon exploration: AAPG Memoir 26, 1977, 53~62
Partington M, Mitchener B, Milton N, et al. Genetic sequence stratigraphy for the North Sea Late Jurassic and early Cretaceous: distribution and prediction of Kimmeridgian-late Ryazanian reservoirs in the North Sea and adjacent areas. In: Parker J, eds. Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe, 1993, 4: 327~370
Philip J, Ashworth, James L, et al. The relationship between channel avulsion, flow occupancy and aggradation in braided rivers: insights from an experimental model. Sedimentology, 2007, 54: 497~513
Posamentier H, Jervey M, Vail P. Eustatic controls on clastic deposition I conceptual framework, In: Wilgus C, Hastings B S, Kendall C G, Posamentier H W, Ross C A and Van Wagoner J C, eds. Sea level changes: an integrated approach. SEPM Spec., 1988, 42: 109~124
Posamentier H, Vail P. Eustatic controls on clastic deposition II-sequence and systems tract models, In: Wilgus C, Hastings B S, Kendall C G, Posamentier H W, Ross C A, Van Wagoner, J C. eds. Sea level changes: an integrated approach. SEPM Spec., 1988, 42: 125~154
Schwarzacher W. Cyclostratigraphy and Milankovitch theory. Development inSedimentology, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1993, 52
Shanley K W, McCabe P J. Perspectives on the sequence stratigraphy of continental strata. AAPG Bulletin, 1994, 78: 544~568
Shanley K W. Alluvial architecture in a sequence stratigraphy framework. Journal of Geology, 1994, 102(2): 105~109
Shanley K W. River response to base-level changes: Implication for sequence stratigraphy. Journal of Geology, 1993, 101(3): 279~294
Sinclair H D.黄腾,译.周缘前陆盆地中复理石向磨拉石的转换——被动大陆边缘对板块破裂的作用.地质科学译丛, 1998, 15(2): 32~38
Sloss L, Krumbein W, Dapples E. Integrated facies analysis, In: Longwell C, eds. Sedimentary facies in geologic history. Geological Society America Memoir, 1949, 39: 91~124
Sloss L. Sequences in the cratonic interior of North America. GSA Bulletin, 1963, 74: 93~113
Vail P, Audemard F, Bowman S A, et al. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustasy and sedimentology-an overview. In: Einsele G, Richen W, Seilacher A, eds. Cycles and events in stratigraphy, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991, 617~659
Vail P. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level. In: Payton C, eds. Seismic stratigraphy: applications to hydrocarbon exploration. AAPG Memoir, 1977, 26: 49~212
Vail P. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy. PartⅠ: Seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure. In: Bally A W, eds. Atlas of sesmic stratigraphy. AAPG, Studies in Geology, 1987, 27: 1~10
Vail P. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustasy and sedimentology an overview. In: Einsele G, et al. eds. Cycles and events in stratigraphy. New York: Springer Verlag, 1991
Van Wagoner J C, Bertram G T. Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basin deposits-outcrop and subsurface examples from the Cretaceous of North America. AAPG Memoir, 1995, 64
Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum H M, Campion K M, et al. Silisiclastic seguence stratigraphyin well logs, cores and outcrops: concepts for high-resolution correlation of time and facies. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 1990, 7: 1~5
Wheeler H E, Murray H. Base level control patterns in cyclothemic sedimentation. AAPG Bulletin, 1957, 41: 1985~2011
Wheeler H E. Base level, lithosphere surface and time stratigraphy. Geological Society America Bulletin, 1964, 75: 599~610
陈发景,汪新文,陈昭年,等.前陆盆地分析.北京:地质出版社, 2007
陈发景,汪新文,张光亚,等.中国中、新生代前陆盆地的构造特征和地球动力学.地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 1996 , 21(4): 366~372
陈洪德,庞林,倪新锋,等.中上扬子地区海相油气勘探前景.石油实验地质, 2007, 29(1): 13~18
陈留勤,段凯波,霍荣,等.晚三叠世中扬子北缘前陆盆地层序地层特征及沉积演化.高校地质学报, 2009, 15(3): 328~338
陈书平,汤良杰,张一伟.前陆、前陆盆地和前陆盆地系统,世界地质, 2001, 20(4): 332~338
崔永刚等.构造对三级层序的控制作用.地层学杂志, 2007, 31(2): 179~183
戴朝成,郑荣才,朱如凯,等.四川类前陆盆地须家河组震积岩的发现及其研究意义.地球科学进展, 2009, 24(2): 172~180
戴少武.中扬子及邻区层序地层与原型盆地演化.石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(3): 229~235
邓宏文,李熙哲.层序地层地层基准面的识别,对比技术及应用.石油与天然气地质, 1996, 17(3): 177~184
邓宏文,王红亮.沉积物体积分配原理——高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础.地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 305~313
邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派——高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质, 1995, 16(2): 89~97
丁道桂,郭彤楼,胡明霞,等.论江南—雪峰基底拆离式构造——南方构造问题之一.石油实验地质, 2007, 29(2): 120~132
丁道桂,潘文蕾,彭金宁,等.扬子板块中、古生代盆地的改造变形.石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(5): 597~606
董清水,刘招君,方石,等.论陆相层序地层学四分方案的可行性.沉积学报, 2003, 21(2): 324~327
董云鹏,张国伟.造山带与前陆盆地结构构造及动力学研究思路和进展.地球科学进展, 1997, 12(1): 1~6
杜小弟,左权,刘万洙.前陆盆地的识别及形成演化.世界地质, 1994, 13(3): 11~14
段凯波,陈留勤.鄂东地区中侏罗统陆相层序地层及其主控因素.大庆石油学院学报, 2011, 35(1): 15~20
段凯波,段东生,陈留勤,等.微生物碳酸盐岩研究进展及存在的问题.西北地质, 2008, 41(1): 44~49
樊太亮,李庆谋.沉积基准面变化分析技术及其应用.石油与天然气地质, 1997, 18(2): 108~114
方石,蔡尧忠.河流相层序地层学研究.世界地质, 2000, 19(2): 132~13
付宜兴,张萍,李志祥,等.中扬子区构造特征及勘探方向建议.大地构造与成矿学, 2007, 31(3): 308~314
高长林,叶德燎,钱一雄.前陆盆地的类型及油气远景.石油实验地质, 2000, 22(2): 99~104
顾家裕,张兴阳.陆相层序地层学进展与在油气勘探开发中的应用.石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(5): 484~490
顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式.石油勘探与开发, 1995, 22(4): 6~10
贵州省地质矿产局.贵州省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1987: 1~698
郭令智,朱文斌,马瑞士,等.论构造耦合作用.大地构造与成矿学, 2003, 27(3): 197~205
郭巍,刘招君,董清水,等.断陷湖盆层序地层格架中的油气聚焦规律——以松辽盆地为例.吉林大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 32(3): 233~237
郭旭升,梅廉夫,汤济广,等.扬子地块中、新生代构造演化对海相油气成藏的制约.石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(3): 295~304
郝杰,李曰俊.磨拉石与造山旋回.湖南地质, 1994, 13(3): 186~189
胡受权.湖平面变化及物源供给对陆相层序影响机理的计算机模拟.断块油气田, 2000, 7(6): 1~4
湖北省地质矿产局.湖北省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1990: 1~710
湖南省地质矿产局.湖南省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1988: 1~718
贾承造.前陆冲断带油气勘探.北京:石油工业出版社, 2000: 1~351
贾进华.库车前陆盆地白垩纪巴什基奇克组沉积层序与储层研究.地学前缘, 2000, 7(3) : 133~144
焦文放,吴元保,彭敏,等.扬子板块最古老岩石的锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素组成.中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2009, 39(7): 972~978
解习农,李思田.陆相盆地层序地层学研究特点.地质科学情报, 1993, 12(1): 22~26
李丕龙,金之钧,张善文,等.济阳坳陷油气勘探现状及主要研究进展.石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(3): 1~4
李曙光, Hart S R,郑双根,等.中国华北、华南陆块碰撞时代的钐—钕同位素年龄证据.
中国科学B辑, 1989, 3: 312~319
李思田,杨士恭.论沉积盆地的等时地层格架和基本建造单元.沉积学报, 1992, 10(4): 11~22
李思田.论沉积盆地分析领域的追踪与创新.沉积学报, 1992, 10(3): 10~15
李忠,李任伟,孙枢.大别山中生代构造演化:来自盆地充填记录的启示.地质通报, 2002, 21(8-9): 547~553
林畅松,李思田,任建业.断陷湖盆层序地层研究和计算机模拟——以二连盆地乌里雅斯太断陷为例.地学前缘, 1995, 2(3-4): 124~132
林畅松,张燕梅.高精度层序地层学和储层预测.地学前缘, 2000, 7(3): 111~117
林畅松.沉积盆地的构造地层分析——以中国构造活动盆地研究为例.现代地质, 2006, 20(2): 185~194
刘池洋,赵红格,杨兴科,等.前陆盆地及其确定和研究.石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(4): 307~313
刘光鼎.中国海大地构造演化.石油与天然气地质, 1990, 11(1): 23~29
刘少峰,李思田.前陆盆地形成的力学机制.地球科学, 1996, 21(1): 57~62
刘少峰,张国伟,程顺有.东秦岭—大别山及邻区挠曲类盆地演化与碰撞造山过程.地球科学, 1999, 34(3): 336~346
刘少峰,张国伟.盆山关系研究的基本思路、内容和方法.地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京); 北京大学), 2005, 12(3): 101~111
刘树根,罗志立.从华南板块构造演化探讨中国南方油气藏分布的规律性.石油学报,2001, 22(4): 24~31
刘细元,钟达洪,袁建芽,等.扬子板块与华南板块对接带萍乡区段构造特征.地质力学学报, 2004, 10(4): 372~379
刘新民,付宜兴,郭战峰.等,中扬子区南华纪以来盆地演化与油气响应特征.石油实验地质, 2009, 31(2): 160~165
刘新民,郭战峰,付宜兴.中扬子区东南缘下组合天然气勘探潜力分析.华南地质与矿产, 2007, 1: 59~64
刘贻军.前陆盆地层序地层学研究中的几个问题.地球学报, 1998, 19(1): 90~96
刘云生,郭战峰,梁西文,等.中上扬子地区晚三叠世—侏罗纪砂岩构造意义及盆山耦合关系.石油实验地质, 2006, 28(3): 201~205
刘志丽,童金南.中国南方中三叠世地层及沉积古地理分异.沉积学报, 2001, 19(3): 327~332
吕红华,周祖翼.前陆盆地陆源沉积序列的特征与成因机制.地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7): 706~714
梅廉夫,戴少武,沈传波,等.中、下扬子区中、新生代陆内对冲带的形成及解体.地质科技情报, 2008, 27(4): 1~7
梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.滇黔桂盆地及邻区二叠系乐平统层序地层格架及其古地理背景.中国科学D辑, 2007, 37(5): 605~617
梅冥相,马永生.雾迷山旋回层的基本相序模式—兼论其马尔柯夫链分析及在长周期三级层序中的有序叠加形式.地质学报, 2001, 075(004): 476~476
梅冥相,徐德斌.沉积地层旋回性记录中几个理论问题的认识:兼论“露头层序地层”的工作方法.现代地质, 1996, 10(1): 85~92
梅冥相,徐德斌.米级旋回层序的成因类型及其相序结构特征.沉积学报, 2000, 18(1): 4~49
梅冥相.中上扬子印支运动的地层学效应及晚三叠世沉积盆地格局.地学前缘, 2010, 17(4): 99~111
牟传龙.从被动边缘到前陆盆地的演化模式——兼论前陆盆地的控矿作用.岩相古地理, 1990, 2: 56~62
倪新锋,陈洪德,田景春,等.陆相层序地层学理论体系及发展趋势.沉积与特提斯地质, 2002, 22(4): 35~42
倪新锋,陈洪德,韦东晓,等.中上扬子盆地叠加、改造类型及油气勘探前景.地质学报, 2009, 83(4): 468~477
四川省地质矿产局.四川省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 1991: 1~730
宋传中,张国伟,任升莲,等.秦岭—大别造山带中几条重要构造带的特征及其意义.西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 39(3): 368~380
汪建国,陈代钊,王清晨,等.中扬子地区晚震旦世—早寒武世转折期台—盆演化及烃源岩形成机理.地质学报, 2007, 81(8): 1102~1109
汪新伟,沃玉进,张荣强.扬子克拉通南华纪—早古生代的构造—沉积旋回.现代地质, 2008, 22(4): 525~533
汪泽成,刘和甫,熊宝贤,等.从前陆盆地充填地层分析盆山耦合关系.地球科学, 2001, 26(1): 33~39
王鹤年,周丽娅.华南地质构造的再认识.高校地质学报, 2006, 12(4): 457~465
王鸿祯,史晓颖.沉积层序及海平面旋回的分类级别:旋回周期的成因讨论.现代地质, 1998, 12(1): 1~16
王华,吴巧生,李绍虎,等.前陆盆地类型及其沉积动力学研究综述.地质科技情报, 1998, 17(3): 12~18
王家豪,陈红汉,王华,等.前陆盆地二级层序内可容纳空间发育演化及三级层序对比. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2005, 30(2): 140~146
王清晨,蔡立国.中国南方显生宙大地构造演化简史.地质学报, 2007, 81(8): 1025~1040
王训练.从综合地层学的观点论确定全球界线层型剖面点(GSSP)的步骤和方法.中国科学(D辑)地球科学, 2002, 32(5): 358~367
魏魁生,徐怀大.华北典型箕状断陷盆地层序地层学模式及其与油气赋集.地球科学, 1993, 18(2): 139~149
魏魁生,徐怀大.冀中地区早第三纪海泛特征及其层序地层学意义.现代地质, 1993, 7(3): 274~284
沃玉进,汪新伟.中、上扬子地区地质结构类型与海相层系油气保存意义.石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(2): 177~187
吴冲龙,杜远生,梅廉夫,等.中国南方印支—燕山期复合盆山体系与盆地原型改造.石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(3): 305~315
夏邦栋,方中,吕洪波,等.磨拉石与全球构造.石油实验地质, 1989, 11(4): 314~318
夏邦栋,方中,于津海.近源与远源磨拉石与造山带.科学通报, 1988, 9: 687~689
夏文臣,周杰,袁伟,等.华南晚三叠世前陆盆地的成因地层格架及演化历史.地球科学, 1994, 19(1): 19~30
徐怀大.层序地层学理论用于我国断陷盆地分析中的问题.石油与天然气地质, 1991, 12(1): 52~57
徐强,姜烨,董伟良,等.中国层序地层研究现状和发展方向.沉积学报, 2003, 21(1): 155~162
徐亚军,杜远生,杨江海.沉积物物源分析研究进展.地质科技情报, 2007, 26(3): 26~32
徐政语,林舸.中扬子地区显生宙构造演化及其对油气系统的影响.大地构造与成矿学, 2001, 25(1): 1~8
许志琴,卢一伦,汤耀庆,等.东秦岭造山带的变形特征及构造演化.地质学报, 1986, 3: 237~247
闫小雄,周立发.前陆盆地层序地层学研究现状及进展.沉积与特提斯地质, 2001, 21(3): 60~64
颜丹平,宋鸿林,傅昭仁.扬子地台西缘造山前的区域伸展作用研究.地学前缘, 1999, 6(4): 1
颜佳新,赵坤.二叠—三叠纪东特提斯地区古地理、古气候和古海洋演化与地球表层多圈层事件藕合.中国科学D辑, 2002, 32(9): 751~759
杨经绥,许志琴,马昌前,等.复合造山作用和中国中央造山带的科学问题.中国地质, 2010, 37(1): 1~11
张传恒,王自强,贾维民.论造山运动的时间特征.地质学报, 1997, 71(1): 18~26
张国伟,董云鹏,赖绍聪.秦岭—大别造山带南缘勉略构造带与勉略缝合带.中国科学D辑, 2003, 33(12): 1121~1135
张国伟,柳小明.关于“中央造山带”几个问题的思考.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 1998, (23)5: 443~448
张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚,等.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学.北京:科学出版社, 2001: 1~855
张明利,金之钧,汤良杰,等.前陆盆地研究的回顾与展望.地质论评, 2002, 48(2): 214~220
赵玉光,许效松,刘宝珺.克拉通边缘前陆盆地动力层序地层学.岩相古地理, 1997,17(1): 1~10
赵宗举,朱琰,李大成,等.中国南方构造形变对油气藏的控制作用.石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(1): 19~23
郑荣才,戴朝成,朱如凯,等.四川类前陆盆地须家河组层序—岩相古地理特征.地质论评, 2009 , 55(4): 484~495
郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义.沉积学报, 2001, 19(2): 249~255
郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析.沉积学报, 2000, 18(3): 369~374
周雁,陈洪德,王成善,等.中扬子区海相地层层序样式及其油气地质意义.成都理工学院学报, 2002, 29(1): 26~30
周总瑛,蒋泰然,吴乃荃.前陆盆地挠曲沉降定量分析.石油地球物理勘探, 1996, 31(5): 699~703