用户名: 密码: 验证码:
城市化加速推进中的农村土地冲突原因及规避机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
城市化是人类社会经济发展的过程和结果,城市化水平体现一个国家经济和社会发展的程度,同时也是经济社会发展创新的载体。伴随着城市化的加速推进,以江西省为例,研究其城市化加速推进中农村土地冲突的诱发因子,并提出相应的规避政策建议具有着重要的理论和现实意义。
     本文正是基于此种背景展开研究。首先,本文对农村土地冲突的概念、特点和分类进行了阐述,而后通过问卷调查和土地冲突案例资料收集,借助系统论的思想,分析了城市化加速推进中农村土地冲突来源的机理。结果表明,农民(生活事件、个性因素、和其他利益主体的矛盾)和社会环境(历史因素、制度因素、其他社会因素)以及其他因素(土地的稀缺、土地周围的交通状况等)是引发土地冲突的主要来源。
     其次,采用层次分析法和聚类分析法揭示了城市化加速推进中江西省农村土地冲突的主要原因,发现农民与政府、农民生活事件、土地稀缺性、城市化征地是引发农村土地冲突的主要原因,农民与村委会、农民与房地产商、土地使用性、农民个性因素、土地质量、土地权属不清、土地承包、社会保障是次要原因,而土地周围的交通情况、土地的位置、政策因素、计划生育与土地承包挂钩、户籍变更、人口迁徙等则属于一般原因。
     然后,在软件SPSS13.0的支持下,对选取的6个关键指标进行边际分析,计算结果发现总信访量与城市化征地、政策因素、农民与政府、交通呈线性关系;总信访量与土地稀缺性、权属不清呈立方曲线关系;城市征地信访量与政策因素、农民与政府、交通呈线性关系;城市征地信访量与权属不清呈立方曲线关系;其他信访量与城市化征地、政策因素、农民与政府、交通呈线性关系。
     最后,根据以上对江西省农村土地冲突诱发因子的揭示,以及在该省城市化加速推进的目标要求下,从明确农地的产权制度→确定土地征用补偿制度→落实土地承包与流转→构建社会保障体系→促进失业农民就业的思路,提出了江西省城市化加速推进中的农村土地冲突的政策建议。
The urbanization is the result of economic development, the level of urbanization is an important degree manifests the development of economy and socialization.With the development of urbanization, rural land conflicts is getting worse. So the research of land conflict sources and policies shows an important significance.
     At this background, First of all, we outlined the concept and characteristic and the type of land conflict. Then we collect the questionnaire survey and case of rural land conflicts which is aim to discover source of rural land conflict in Jiangxi province based on system theory at the process of urbanization. It shows that the main sources are the peasants (life events, personality factors, the contradictions of other interests), the environment of social (historical factors, institutional factors, and other social factors) and other factors (the land of scarcity, the conditions of transport around land).
     Secondly, we use AHP and cluster analysis to research the main source. It shows that the main cause of rural land conflicts are farmers and the government, the life events of farmers, the land of scarcity and the land of urbanization. The secondary cause of rural land conflicts are farmers and the real estate, the use of land, the farmers of personality factors, the quality of land, the problem of land ownership, the contracts of land and the security of social. The general cause of rural land conflicts are the conditions of transport around land, the position of land, policy factors, the link of family planning and contracts of land, the change of household registration and the movements of population:
     Thirdly, in the operational circumstances, we can get the marginal Eigen value from analysis six quantitative indications with the method of marginal analysis. It shows that it is a linear relationship between the total petitions and the land of urbanization, policy factors, farmers and the government, the conditions of transport around land. It is a cubic curve relationship between the total petitions and the land of scarcity, the problem of land ownership. It is a linear relationship between the land of urbanization and policy factors, farmers and the government, the conditions of transport around land. It is a cubic curve relationship between the land of urbanization and the problem of land ownership.it is a linear relationship between the others petitions and the land of urbanization, policy factors, farmers and the government, the conditions of transport around land.
     Finally, based on analysis above, we propose the policy about the rural land conflicts at the background of the process of urbanization. These polices are that to clear the system of property rights of agricultural land, determine the system of compensation of urbanization land, carry out the system of land contract and transfer, build the system of social security, promote the employment rate for the peasants of unemployment etc.
引文
[1]Simmons C S. The Political Economy of land conflict in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geography,2004,94(1):183-206.
    [2]Deininger K, Castagnini R.Incidence and impact of land conflict in Uganda[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper,2004.
    [3]Deininger K, Castagnini R. Incidence and impact of land conflict in Uganda[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior& Oganization,2006,60(2):321-345.
    [4]Alston L J, Libecap G D and Mueller B. Land reform policies, the sources of violent conflict, and implications for deforestation in the in the Brazilian Amazon[J]. Journal Environmental Economics and Management,2000,39(2):162-188.
    [5]Alston L J. A Framework for understanding institutional analysis in law and the social sciences[R]. Working Paper,2006.
    [6]Urresta E. Report on research findings and policy recommendations for a legal framework for land dispute mediation[R]. Timor-Leste Land Law Program,2004.
    [7]Daudelin J. Land and violence in post-conflict situations[R]. Report prepared for The North-South Institute and The World Bank,2003.
    [8]Tir J.Domestic-Level Territorial Disputes:Conflict Management via Secessions[R].Conflict Management and Peace Science,2006,23(4):309-328.
    [9]Campbell D J, Gichohi H, Albertmwangi, et al. Land use conflict in kajiadoDistrict, Kenya[J]. Land Use Policy,2000,17(2):337-348.
    [10]Paterson D. Conflicts arising from management and use of customary land[C]. South Pacific Land Tenure Conflict sysmposim,2002.
    [11]Andrew J.S. Potential application of mediation to land use conflicts in small scale mining[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2003,11:117-130.
    [12]Ross M L. The paradox of plentyroil booms and petro-states[J].World Politics,1999,51(2):297-322.
    [13]Billon L P.The political ecology of war:Natural resources and armed conflicts[J]. Political Geography,2001,20(5):561-584.
    [14]Auty R, Resource abundance and economic development[M]. Oxford:Oxfoed University Press,2001.
    [15]Thanakvaro T D L. Stakeholder management for conservation projects:a casestudy of Ream National Park, Cambodia[J]. Environmental management,2001,28(1):47-60.
    [16]Owen L, Waynehoward and Waldron M. Conflicts over farming practices in Canada:the role of interactive conflict resolution approaches[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2000,16:475-483.
    [17]Mungai D.N., Ong C.K. and Kiteme B., et al. Lessons from two long-term hydrologicalstudies in Kenya and Sri Lanka[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2004,104:135-143.
    [18]Amman H M and Duraiappah A K. Land Tenure and Conflict Resolution:A Game Theoretic Approach in the Narok District in Kenya[R]. Working Paper,No 37,2001.
    [19]Boydell S. Modelling land Tenure conflict transformation[J]. South Pacific Land Tenure Conflict sysmposim,2002.
    [20]Chacon M. Principles of PPGIS for Land Conflict Resolution in Guatemala[R]. http://www.iapad.org/publications/ppgis/ppgis_conflict_resolution_guatemala.pdf.
    [21]Pau L C. GIS as Tool for Land Conflict Management in Cambodia[D]. Technishe University Master,2003.
    [22]George Johnson, Jean L. Coleman, David G. Pitt. Feedlots and land-use conflict[R]. http://www.asu.edu/caed/proceedings02/JOHNSON/johnson.htm,2002.
    [23]Kacheleah and Dabbert S. An economic approach for a better understanding of conflicts between farmers and nature conservationists-an application of the decision support system ODAM to the Lower Odra Valley National Park[J]. Agricultural Systems,2002,74:241-255.
    [24]Sorensen A. Conflict, consensus or consent:implications of Japanese land readjustment practice for developing countries[J]. Habitat International,2000,24:51-73.
    [25]Kairaba A.Country case study:Rwand[R].World Bank Regional Workshop on Land Issues in Africa and the Middle East.Kampala,Uganda,2002.
    [26]Boydell S. Land and land conflict in the south Pacific[R]. Consultancy Report for the Food & Agriculture organization(FOA) of the United Nations,2001.
    [27]Kay C. Reflection on rural violence in Latin America[J].Third World Quarterly,2002,22(5):741-755.
    [28]Desiderius C P M. Coastal and marine resource use conflict and sustainable development in Tanzania[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management,2000,43:475-494.
    [29]Sullivan W C, Anderson O and Taylorlovell S. Agricultural buffers at the rural-urban fringe: an examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2004,69:299-313.
    [30]于伯华,吕昌河.北京市顺义区土地资源竞争与土地利用变化分析[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(10):94-97.
    [31]于伯华.城市边缘区土地利用冲突:理论框架与案例研究[D].中国科学院博士学位论文,2006.
    [32]李红波,谭术魁,游和远.当代中国土地冲突问题及其根源探究[J].天府新论,2006,(6):60-63.
    [33]谭术魁.国外有关土地冲突及其管理的研究概要[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(3):74-80.
    [34]崔文星.论社会主义新农村建设中农村土地权利的冲突和对策[J].理论月刊,2007,(9):163-168.
    [35]朱冬亮.当前农村土地纠纷及其解决方式[J].厦门大学学报,2003,(1):50-58.
    [36]师锋.论农村土地纠纷的现状、成因及对策[J].法制与社会,2007,(1):536-537.
    [37]黄卫红.我国农村土地纠纷成因透析[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(5):1473-1474.
    [38]刘盛和.城市土地利用扩展的空间模式与动力机制[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(1):43-49.
    [39]周天勇.土地制度的供求冲突与其改革的框架性安排[J].管理世界,2003,(10):40-49.
    [40]张光宏,彭小贵.农地产权制度:基本矛盾下的博弈分析[J].农业经济问题,2006,(4):50-53,80.
    [41]郑天锋,刘琳丽.土地征用制度及其利益冲突的原因分析[J].兰州学刊,2005,(6):161-163.
    [42]田峰.城镇土地整理过程中的土地权利冲突与解决[J].法学论坛,2008,(2):119-121.
    [43]李红波,谭术魁,彭开丽.诱发农村土地冲突的土地法规缺陷探析[J].经济体制改革,2007,(1):90-95.
    [44]刘觉民,李毅,马姝玮,等.城镇化快速发展中的土地资源优化配置研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,7(1):10-13.
    [45]姚从容.城市化进程中的失地农民—制度安排与利益冲突[J].人口与经济,2006,(3):61-66.
    [46]安虎森,邹璇.失地农民补偿问题研究[J].求索,2006,(6):1-5.
    [47]唐红波,彭波.城市土地配置过程中的博弈论分析[J].湖北社会科学,2005,(2):70-75.
    [48]潘扬彬,郑庆昌.城市化过程中征地博弈分析[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,9(2):15-18.
    [49]杨涛,施国庆.建设征地中相关利益主体利益关系探析[J].农村经济,2006,(2):19-21.
    [50]柯小兵,何高潮.从三层博弈关系看土地征收制度改革—基于某大学城征地案例的分析[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(3):14-18.
    [51]唐在富.中央政府与地方政府在土地调控中的博弈分析—诠释宏观调控中政府间关系协调的一种新尝试[J].当代财经,2007,(8):24-29.
    [52]张换兆,王家庭.城市土地集约利用中的政府博弈行为分析[J].财经科学,2007,(9):61-68.
    [53]张建,汪应宏,徐占军.国有土地使用权出让寻租行为的博弈分析[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,25(1):101-105.
    [54]危朝安.村里的闲田怎样转起来——江西省宜春市土地经营权流转的探索[J].嘹望新闻周刊,2001,(31):38-39.
    [55]傅建春.对农村土地流转问题的探讨——江西万年县梓埠镇土地流转现状及经验[J].重庆交通学院学报(社科版),2005,5(2):37-39.
    [56]汪建红,曹建华.农村土地流转机制效应与绩效——以江西为例[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(4):32-35.
    [57]王鹏,黄贤金,张兆干,杨肇卫.江西上饶县农业结构调整与土地利用变化分析[J].资源科学,2004,26(2):115-122.
    [58]梁涛,蔡春霞,刘民,彭小雷.城市土地的生态适宜性评价方法——以江西萍乡市为例[J].地理研究,2007,26(4):782-787.
    [59]林婷,肖田.江西土地利用/覆盖变化研究[J].江西测绘,2007,(67):40-42.
    [60]严金泉.组、村集体土地所有权博弈理论与经验解释——以福建、江西两省31村为例[J].中国土地科学,2000,14(3):10-14,26.
    [61]熊小红,刘斌.农村离婚妇女土地权益流失的现状及其影响研究——来自江西H县的调查.农业考古,2006,299-302.
    [62]付慧莲.我国农村土地冲突的类型及时空分布规律研究[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [63]李媛.农村土地冲突来源及诱发因子研究[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [64]刘耀彬.中部崛起背景下的江西省城市群培育及其协控路径研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2008.
    [65]李林.中国城市化质量差异与其影响因素研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社经济科学出版社,2008.
    [66]张升友.当前农村土地纠纷产生的原因及对策[J].农业经济,2007,(11):48-49.
    [67]周艳波.论农村土地纠纷类型、原因和解决措施[J].学术界,2008,(1):171-176.
    [68]谭日辉.农村土地流转过程中的阶层冲突研究[D].湖南师范大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [69]曾霄,李坤.农村土地承包纠纷产生的原因及对策[J].当代经济,2006,(7):10-11.
    [70]王云江,冯瑞琳,孙淑云.论城市化进程中农民土地权益的缺失[J].河北工程大学学报(社会科学版),2007,24(1):63-66.
    [71]王晓明.城市化进程中失地农民权益问题研究[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文,2003.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700