用户名: 密码: 验证码:
面向加工—装配混合生产系统的优化排序研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着市场竞争进一步的加剧和产品需求个性化的发展,为了能够及时满足用户多样化的需求,同时又不大量增加企业的库存,近年来,越来越多的企业采用了混流加工-装配系统以提高企业生产的柔性和应对市场需求不断变化的能力,从而提升企业的市场竞争力,比如在轿车发动机、汽车、家用空调等生产企业中,普遍都采用了加工-装配式混流生产系统。为了提高混流加工-装配系统的生产效率,可以采用改善生产设施的方法,比如引进效率更高的生产设备等,但是采用这种方法的成本较高,实施时间较长。相比之下,采用优化混流加工-装配系统生产顺序的方法更具经济性和实用性。本文以轿车发动机混流加工-装配系统为研究背景,对该类系统中的四类典型的优化排序问题进行了深入的研究。
     通过对轿车发动机生产系统的组成以及各条生产线的性质的分析,对本文要研究的问题进行了归类。按照部件加工线调度、混流装配线排序、加工-装配系统集成优化排序,以及加工-装配系统批量和排序集成优化的顺序分别对各个问题的国内外研究现状进行了系统全面的综述,指出了各个领域存在的问题。
     对于单条部件加工线调度问题,以最小化最大完工时间为优化目标,对带有限中间缓冲区的多级混合流水部件加工线的调度问题进行了研究。为了确定调度方案,并计算最大完工时间,提出了一种由第一工位投产序列,采用基于事件驱动和空闲机器优先规则相结合的方法。采用了基于遗传算法和模拟退火算法的混合算法求解该问题,在该混合算法中,采用启发式方法和随机产生相结合的方式形成初始种群,结合问题本身的特点设计了新的选择、交叉和变异算子。通过遗传算法和模拟退火算法的混合,克服了各个单一算法的不足,平衡了算法广泛性搜索和集中性搜索的能力。针对相同的问题和计算数据,将该算法的优化结果与近年发表的文献中的结果进行了比较,比较结果验证了该算法的有效性和优越性。然后,按照奇瑞第二发动机公司各条部件加工线的实际构成,应用该公司真实的数据,分别对缸体、缸盖、曲轴和凸轮轴加工线的班次加工计划进行了优化调度,对于每条加工线的调度结果均优于奇瑞第二发动机公司目前采用的调度方法的结果。
     对于单条混流装配线的排序问题,以部件消耗平顺化和最小化最大完工时间为目标,建立了带有限中间缓冲区的混流装配线的两目标优化排序数学模型。结合多目标混流装配优化排序问题的特点,设计了一种多目标遗传算法用于问题的求解。在此算法中,应用了帕累托分级和共享函数的方法用于可行解适应度值的评价,保证了解的分布性和均匀性,同时对种群初始化、选择、交叉、变异算子以及精英保留策略进行了设计。按照奇瑞发动机公司装配线的实际构成和真实的数据,将该算法的优化结果与采用前一章中的混合算法分别对两个单目标进行优化的结果进行了比较,比较结果验证了该多目标遗传算法的可行性和有效性。
     对于加工-装配系统集成优化排序问题,研究了由一条带有限中间缓冲区的混流装配线和若干条带并行机和有限中间缓存区的部件加工线组成的拉式生产系统的集成优化排序问题,以平顺化混流装配线的部件消耗及最小化装配线和多条加工线总的完工时间成本为优化目标,提出了系统集成优化框架,基于之前对各条加工线调度和的装配线排序问题的研究,考虑产品和部件的库存约束,建立了集成优化数学模型,提出了一种由装配序列产生各条加工线第一工位加工序列的方法,设计了一种新的多目标遗传算法用于求解该问题,在此算法中,采用了可适应的遗传算子和新的适应度评价函数。对多目标优化算法得到的非支配解集,提出了基于满意度函数的评价方法。按照奇瑞发动机公司各条生产线的实际构成和真实的数据,通过与多目标模拟退火算法的结果进行比较,比较结果验证了该多目标遗传算法的可行性和有效性,应用该可适应多目标遗传算法可以获得满意的非支配解集。
     为了能够充分利用各个调度区间各条生产线的生产能力,同时为了克服采用完全混流排序方法可能造成频繁切换,以致引起错漏装操作的不足,以装配车间三个连续班次生产计划为输入,以最小化加工-装配系统总的正常完工时间成本、超时完工时间成本和库存成本为目标,对该加工-装配系统的批量和排序集成优化问题进行了研究,建立了优化数学模型,提出了一种基于遗传算法和禁忌搜索算法的混合求解方法,在该算法中,提出了新的编码方式、交叉和变异方法,采用了可适应的交叉和变异算子,应用企业的实际生产数据,将该算法的优化结果与可适应遗传算法的优化结果进行了比较,比较结果验证了该混合算法的有效性。
     结合奇瑞第二发动机公司的实际需求,对发动机混流生产计划管理的现状、存在问题以及需求进行分析,设计并开发了一套面向发动机混流生产的计划管理软件系统,并把本文提出的优化排序方法应用到该系统中,使研究成果能够在企业中得到实际应用。
     最后,对全文所做的主要工作进行了总结,并对后续的研究进行了展望。
As the development of customization production, more and more mixed-model fabrication-assembly systems are adopted by different manufacturing enterprises, such as in car engine, automobile, air conditioner manufacturing industries, et al., to meet diversified demands of customers without holding large end product inventory. The efficency of these production systems can be improved by two ways. One way is to improve the hardware facilities, for example, by importing more efficient equipments. The shortcomings of this method are that it is expensive and it needs a long period to finish implementation. The other way is to optimize the production sequences. In contrast, the second method is more economic and realistic. In this paper, four typical sequencing problems in car engine mixed-model fabrication-assembly systems are fully addressed.
     The car engine mixed-model fabrication-assembly systems are analyzed to classify the the typical problems to be considered in this paper, including:scheduling problems in hybrid parts fabrication lines, sequencing problems in mixed-model assembly lines, integrated sequencing problems in mixed-model fabrication-assembly systems and lot sizing and sequencing problems in mixed-model fabrication-assembly systems. And then, the research work in each field is reviewed and the exsiting problems in each field are presented.
     Then, scheduling problems in hybrid part fabrication flow lines with limited intermediate buffers are considered. The optimization objective is minimizing the makespan. A method, which based on event driven and first available machine rule, is proposed to construct complete schedule and to determine the makespan from the production sequences for the first station. A hybrid algorithm based on genetic algorithm and simulated annealing is proposed to solve the optimization problem, which can balance the algorithm's exploration and exploitation abilities. In this algorithm, two heuristic approaches and a random generation method are adopted together to form the initial population, new selection, crossover and mutation operators are designed. The feasibility and superiority of the hybrid algorithm is shown by comparing with the methods presented in recently published literature for the same optimization problems. And then, the proposed algorithm is used to solve the real scheduling problems in cylinder body, cylinder cover, crank shaft and camshaft fabrication lines, respectively, in the Second Engine Company of Chery Automobile Co., Ltd. All the optimization results obtained by the hybrid algorithm are better than those obtained by the adopted scheduling method in this company.
     For sequencing problems in mixed-model assembly lines with limited intermediate buffers, two optimization objectives are considered simultaneously:minimizing the variation in parts consumption and minimizing the makespan. The mathematical models are presented. A multi-objective genetic algorithm are proposed to solve the models. In this algorithm, a new fitness value function is presented based on Pareto ranking and sharing function method to evaluate each individual, which can guarantee the individuals' diversity and uniformity in the non-dominated solution set. New initialization method, selection, crossover, mutation operators, and elitist strategy are presented. Using the real production data in the Second Engine Company of Chery Automobile Co., Ltd, the multi-objective genetic algorithm is applied to optimize the production sequences for the mixed-model assembly line. The optimization results are compared to the single objective optimization result obtained by the hybrid algorithm proposed in chapter 2 respectively. The comparison results show that multi-objective genetic algorithm proposed in this chapter is an efficient method for sequencing problems in mixed-model assembly lines.
     Next, integrated sequencing problems in mixed-model fabrication-assembly systems are investigated. The considered production systems are composed of one mixed-model assembly line with limited intermediate buffers and four parts fabrication lines with limited intermediate buffers and identical parallel machines. The optimization objectives include minimizing the variation in parts consumption in the assembly line and minimizing the total makespan cost in the fabrication-assembly system. Based on the research efforts in previous chapters, considering the inventory constraints, the integrated optimization framework and mathematical models are proposed. A three-stage method to determine the production sequences for the first stations of all the fabrication lines from the production sequence for the assembly line is put forward. An adaptive multi-objective genetic algorithm is presented for solving the integrated optimization problem. In this algorithm, adaptive crossover probobility and mutation probobility are adopted to perform genetic operations, and new fitness value function is employed to guarantee the solutions' diversity and uniformity. A method based on desirability function is proposed for comparing the non-dominated solution sets obtained by multi-objective optimization algorithms. The optimization results of the adaptive multi-objective genetic algorithm is compared to a multi-objective simulated annealing algorithm by using the real production data in the Second Engine Company of Chery Automobile Co., Ltd. The comparision results indicate that the adaptive multi-objective genetic algorithm performs better than the multi-objective simulated annealing algorithm, satisfactory non-dominated solution sets can be obtained by the adaptive multi-objective genetic algorithm.
     In order to make full use of production capacity in each scheduling period and to avoid too frequent setups and mistake operations caused by complete mixed-model sequencing results, the lot sizing and sequencing integrated optimization problems in mixed-model fabrication-assembly systems are addressed. The lot sizing and sequencing problems consider consequent three shift production plans in the assembly line simultaneously. The optimization objective is minimizing the production cost during normal worktime, production cost during overtime period, and total holding cost during whole planning period. The optimization mathematical models are proposed. A hybrid algorithm based on genetic algorithm and tabu search is presented to solving the mathematical models. In this algorithm, new encoding method, crossover and mutation operators are designed, and adaptive crossover and mutation probobilities are adopted. The superiority of the hybrid algorithm is shown by comparing with an adaptive genetic algorithm using the same real computation data in the Second Engine Company of Chery Automobile Co., Ltd.
     For practical applications, the existing problems and the demand in the mixed-model production plan management in the Second Engine Company of Chery Automobile Co., Ltd are analyzed. A mixed-model production plan management software system is designed and developed. The sequencing methods proposed in this thesis are employed in the software system and applied to real production plan management.
     The research work is concluded and the future research efforts are proposed in the last chapter.
引文
[1]Arthanary T S. Ramaswamy K G. An extension of two machine sequencing problems [J]. Operations Research,1971,8:10-22.
    [2]Linn R, Zhang W. Hybrid flow shop scheduling:a survey [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1999,37:57-61.
    [3]Wang H. Flexible flow shop scheduling:optimum, heuristics, and artificial intelligence solutions [J]. Expert Systems,2005,22(2):78-85.
    [4]Moursli 0, Pochet Y. A branch-and-bound algorithm for the hybrid flowshop [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2000,64(1-3):113-125.
    [5]Brah S A, Hunsucker J L. Branch and bound algorithm for the flow shop with multiple processors [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1991,51:88-99.
    [6]Allaoui H, Artiba A. Scheduling two-stage hybrid flow shop with availability constraints [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2006,33:1399-1419.
    [7]Haouari M, Hidri L, Gharbi A. Optimal scheduling of a two-stage hybrid flow shop [J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research,2006,64:107-124.
    [8]Azizoglu M, Cakmak E, Kondakci S. A flexible flow shop problem with total flow time minimization [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001,132: 528-538.
    [9]Tang L X, Xuan H, Liu J. A new Lagrangian relaxation algorithm for hybrid flowshop scheduling to minimize total weighted completion time [J]. Computers and Operations Research,2006,33:3344-3359.
    [10]Jenabi M, Fatemi Ghomi S M T, Torabi S A, et al. Two hybrid meta-heuristics for the finite horizon ELSP in flexible flow lines with unrelated parallel machines [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation,2007,186:230-245.
    [11]Choi H-S, Lee D-H. Scheduling algorithms to minimize the number of tardy jobs in two-stage hybrid flow shops [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2009,56(1): 113-120.
    [12]Choi H-S, Lee D-H. A branch and bound algorithm for two-stage hybrid flow shops: Minimizing the number of tardy jobs [J]. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers,2007,33:213-220.
    [13]Kyparisis G J, Koulamas C. A note on weighted completion time minimization in a flexible flow shop [J]. Operations Research Letters,2001,29:5-11.
    [14]Oguz C, Ercan M, Edwin Cheng T C, et al. Heuristic algorithms for multiprocessor task scheduling in a two-stage hybrid flow-shop [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2003,149:390-403.
    [15]Thornton H W, Hunsucker J L. A new heuristic for minimal makespan in flow shops with multiple processors and no intermediate storage [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,152:96-114.
    [16]Acero-Dominguez M J, Paternina-Arboleda C D. Scheduling jobs on a K-stage flexible flow shop using a TOC-based (bottleneck) procedure [C]. In:Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium,2004, pp.295-298.
    [17]Lee G C, Kim Y D, Choi S W. Bottleneck-focused scheduling for a hybrid flowshop [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2004,42:165-181.
    [18]Kyparisis G, Koulamas C. A note on makespan minimization in two-stage flexible flow shops with uniform machines [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006,175:1321-1327.
    [19]Logendran R, Carson S, Hanson E. Group scheduling in flexible flow shop [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2005,96:1-13.
    [20]Kyparisis G J, Koulamas C. Flexible flow shop scheduling with uniform parallel machines [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,168:985-997.
    [21]Paternina-Arboleda C D, Montoya-Torres J R, Acero-Dominguez M J, et al. Scheduling jobs on a k-stage flexible flow-shop [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2008,164:29-40.
    [22]Choi H-S, Kim H-W, Lee D-H, et al. Scheduling algorithms for two-stage rentrant hybrid flow shops:minimizing makespan under the maximum allowable due dates [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2009,42: 963-973.
    [23]Ruiz R, Serifoglu F, Urlings T. Modeling realistic hybrid flexible flowshop scheduling problems [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2008,35(4): 1151-1175.
    [24]Bellanger A, Oulamara A. Scheduling hybrid flowshop with parallel batching machines and compatibilities [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2009,36: 1982-1992.
    [25]Botta-Genoulaz V. Hybrid flow shop scheduling with precedence constraints and time lags to minimize maximum lateness [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2000,64:101-111.
    [26]Lin H, Liao C. A case study in a two-stage hybrid flow shop with setup time and dedicated machines [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2003,86: 133-143.
    [27]Yang Y, Kreipl S, Pinedo M. Heuristics for minimizing total weighted tardiness in flexible flow shops [J]. Journal of Schededuling,2000,3:71-88.
    [28]Lee G C, Kim Y D, Kim J G, et al. A dispatching rule-based approach to production scheduling in a printed circuit board manufacturing system [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2003,54:1038-1049.
    [29]Chen C-L, Chen C-L. Bottleneck-based heuristics to minimize total tardiness for the flexible flow line with unrelated parallel machines [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2009,56(4):1393-1401.
    [30]Gupta J N D, Tunc E A. Minimizing tardy jobs in a two-stage hybrid flowshop [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1998,36:2397-2417.
    [31]Gupta J, Kruk K, Lau V, et al. Heuristics for hybrid flow shop with controllable processing times and assignable due dates [J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2002,29:1417-1439.
    [32]Kurz M E, Askin R G. Comparing scheduling rules for flexible flow lines [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2003,85:371-388.
    [33]Kurz M E, Askin R G. Scheduling flexible flow lines with sequence-dependent setup times [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,159:66-82.
    [34]Engin O, Doyen A. A new approach to solve hybrid flow shop scheduling problems by artificial immune system [J]. Future Generation Computer Systems,2004,20: 1083-1095.
    [35]Oguz C, Zinder Y, Do V H, et al. Hybrid flow shop scheduling problems with multiprocessor task systems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004, 152:115-131.
    [36]Bertel S, Billaut J C. A genetic algorithm for an industrial multiprocessor flow shop scheduling problem with recirculation [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,159:651-662.
    [37]Serifoglu F S, Ulusoy G. Multiprocessor task scheduling in multistage hybrid flow-shops:a genetic algorithm approach [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2004,55(5):504-512.
    [38]Oguz C, Ercan M F. A genetic algorithm for hybrid flow-shop scheduling with multiprocessor tasks [J]. Journal of Scheduling,2005,8:323-351.
    [39]Tang L, Zhang Y. Heuristic combined artificial neural networks to schedule hybrid flow shop with sequence dependent setup times [C]. In:Advances in neural networks, LNCS,2005, Vol.3496, pp.788-793.
    [40]Ruiz R, Maroto C. A genetic algorithm for hybrid flow shops with sequence dependent setup times and machine eligibility [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,169:781-800.
    [41]Logendran R, deSzoeke P, Barnard F. Sequence-dependent group scheduling problems in flexible flow shops [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006,102:66-86.
    [42]Zandieh M, Fatemi Ghomi S M T, Moattar Husseini S M. An immune algorithm approach to hybrid flow shops scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation,2006,180:111-127.
    [43]Jin Z, Yang Z, Ito T. Metaheuristic algorithms for the multistage hybrid flowshop scheduling problem [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2006, 100(2):322-34.
    [44]Ercan M F, Fung Y-F. Performance of particle swarm optimization in scheduling hybrid flow-shops with multiprocessor tasks [C]. LNCS 4707, Part Ⅲ,2007, pp. 309-319.
    [45]Alaykyran K, Engin O, Doyen A. Using ant colony optimization to solve hybrid flow shop scheduling problems [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2007,35:541-550.
    [46]Amin-Naseri M R, Beheshti-Nia M A. Hybrid flow shop scheduling with parallel batching [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2009,117(1):185-196.
    [47]Gholami M, Zandieh M, Alem-Tabriz A. Scheduling hybrid flow shop with sequence-dependent setup times and machines with random breakdowns [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2009,42:189-201.
    [48]Yaurima V, Burtseva L, Tchernykh A. Hybrid flowshop with unrelated machines, sequence dependent setup time and availability constraints:An enhanced crossover operator for a genetic algorithm [C]. LNCS,2008, Vol.4967, pp.608-617.
    [49]Naderi B, Zandieh M, Roshanaei V. Scheduling hybrid flowshops with sequence dependent setup times to minimize makespan and maximum tardiness [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2009,41: 1186-1198.
    [50]Zandieh M, Dorri B, Khamseh A R. Robust metaheuristics for group scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times in hybrid flexible flow shops [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2009,43:767-778.
    [51]Low C. Simulated annealing heuristic for flow shop scheduling problems with unrelated parallel machines [J]. Computers and Operations Research,2005,32: 2013-2025.
    [52]Shiau D-F, Cheng S-C, Huang Y-M. Proportionate flexible flow shop scheduling via a hybrid constructive genetic algorithm [J]. Expert System with Applications, 2008,34:1133-1143.
    [53]Yaurima V, Burtseva L, Tchernykh A. Hybrid flowshop with unrelated machines, sequence-dependent setup time, availability constraints and limited buffers [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2009,56(4):1452-1463.
    [54]Janiak A, Kozan E, Lichtenstein M, et al. Metaheuristic approaches to the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with a cost-related criterion [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2007,105:407-424.
    [55]Tang L, Liu W, Liu J. A neural network model and algorithm for the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in a dynamic environment [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,2005,16:361-370.
    [56]Jungwattanakit J, Reodecha M, Chaovalitwongse P, et al. A comparison of scheduling algorithms for flexible flow shop problems with unrelated parallel machines, setup times, and dual criteria [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2009,36:358-378.
    [57]Hall N G, Posner M E, Potts C N. Preemptive scheduling with finite capacity input buffers [J]. Annals of Operations Research,1997,70:399-413.
    [58]Hall N G, Posner M E, Potts C N. Scheduling with finite capacity input buffers [J]. Operations Research,1998,46:S154-159.
    [59]Hall N G, Posner M E, Potts C N. Scheduling with finite capacity output buffers [J]. Operations Research,1998,46:S84-97.
    [60]Khosla I. The scheduling problem where multiple machines compete for a common local buffer [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1995,84:330-42.
    [61]Nowicki E. The permutation flowshops with finite buffers:a tabu search approach [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1999,116:205-219.
    [62]Wang L, Zhang L, Zheng D Z. An effective hybrid genetic algorithm for flow shop scheduling with limited buffers [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2006,33: 2960-2971.
    [63]Norman B A. Scheduling flowshops with finite buffers and sequence-dependent setup times [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1999,36:163-77.
    [64]Leisten R. Flowshop sequencing problems with limited buffer storage [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1990,28:2085-2100.
    [65]Nawaz M, Enscore E J, Ham I. A heuristic algorithm for the mmachine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem [J]. The International Journal of Management Science,1983,11(1):91-95.
    [66]Wittrock R J. An adaptable scheduling algorithm for flexible flow lines [J]. Operations Research,1988,36:445-453.
    [67]Sawik T J. Scheduling flexible flow lines with no in-process buffers [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1995,33(5):1357-1367.
    [68]Sawik T. Mixed integer programming for scheduling flexible flow lines with limited intermediate buffers [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2000,31:39-52.
    [69]Sawik T. An exact approach for batch scheduling in flexible flow lines with limited intermediate buffers [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2002,36:461-471.
    [70]Wardono B, Fathi Y. A tabu search algorithm for the multi-stage parallel machine problem with limited buffer capacities [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,155:380-401.
    [71]Tang L X, Xuan H. Lagrangian relaxation algorithms for real-time hybrid flowshop scheduling with finite intermediate buffers [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2006,57:316-324.
    [72]Wang X, Tang L. A tabu seqrch heuristic for the hybrid flowshop scheduling with finite intermediate buffers [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2009,36: 907-918.
    [73]Monden Y. Toyota production system [M]. Atlanta:Institute of Industrial Engineering Press, Institute of Industrial Engineers,1983.
    [74]Miltenburg J. Level schedules for mixed-model assembly lines in just-in-time production systems [J]. Management Science,1989,35:192-207.
    [75]Inman R R, Bulfin R L. Quick and dirty sequencing for mixed-model multi-level JIT systems [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1992,30:2011-2018.
    [76]Ding F Y, Cheng L. A simple sequencing algorithm for mixed-model assembly lines in just-in-time production systems [J]. Operations Research Letters,1993a,13: 27-35.
    [77]Ding F Y, Cheng L. An effective mixed-model assembly line sequencing heuristic for Just-in-Time production systems [J]. Journal of Operations Management,1993b, 11:45-50.
    [78]Cakir A, Inman R R. Modified goal chasing for products with non-zero/one bills of material [J]. International of Production Research,1993,31:107-115.
    [79]Sumichrast R T, Russel R S. Evaluating mixed-model assembly line sequencing heuristics for just-in-time production systems [J]. Journal of Operations Management,1990,9:371-390.
    [80]Duplaga E A, Bragg D J. Mixed-model assembly line sequencing heuristic for smoothing component parts usage:a comparative analysis [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1998,36:2209-2224.
    [81]Duplaga E A, Hahn C K, Hur D. Mixed-model assembly line sequencing at Hyundai Motor Company [J]. Production and Inventory Management Journal,1996, 37:20-26.
    [82]Miltenburg J, Sinnamon G. Scheduling mixed-model multi-level just-in-time production systems [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1989,27(9): 1487-1509.
    [83]Kubiak W, Sethi S P. Optimal just-in-time schedules for flexible transfer lines [J]. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,1994,6:137-154.
    [84]Miltenburg J, Sinnamon G. Algorithms for scheduling multi-level just-in-time production systems [J]. HE Transactions,1992,24:121-130.
    [85]Ponnambalam S G, Aravindan P, Rao M S. Genetic algorithms for sequencing problems in mixed model assembly lines [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2003,45:669-690.
    [86]Morabito M A, Kraus M E. Discussion:A note on "scheduling mixed-model multi-level just-in-time production systems" [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1995,53:2061-2063.
    [87]Aigbedo H, Monden Y. A simulation analysis for two-level sequence-scheduling for just-in-time (JIT) mixed-model assembly lines [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1996,34:3107-3124.
    [88]Steiner G, Yeomans J S. Optimal level schedules in mixed-model, multi level JIT assembly systems with pegging [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996,95:38-52.
    [89]Kubiak W, Steiner G, Yeomans J S. Optimal level schedules for mixed-model, multi-level just-in-time assembly systems [J]. Annals of Operations Research,1997, 69:241-259.
    [90]Leu Y, Huang P, Russell R. Using beam search technique for sequencing mixed-model assembly lines [J]. Annals of Operations Research,1997,70:379-397.
    [91]Monden Y. Toyota Production System [M]. Norcross:Industrial Engineering and Management Press,1993.
    [92]Leu Y, Matheson L, Rees L. Sequencing mixed model assembly line with genetic algorithm [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1996,30:1027-1036.
    [93]Xiaobo Z, Zhou Z, Asres A. A note on Toyota's goal of sequencing mixed models on an assembly line [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1999,36:57-65.
    [94]Xiaobo Z, Zhou Z. Algorithms for Toyota's goal of sequencing mixed models on an assembly line with multiple workstations [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,1999,50:704-710.
    [95]Kurashige K, Yanagawa Y, Miyazaki S, et al. Time-based goal chasing method for mixed-model assembly line problem with multiple work stations [J]. Production Planning & Control,2002,13(8):735-745.
    [96]Kubiak W. Minimizing variation of production rates in JIT systems:A survey [J]. European Journal of Operations Research,1993,66:259-271.
    [97]Zhu J, Ding F. A transformed two-stage method for reducing the part-usage variation and a comparison of the product-level and part-level solutions in sequencing mixed-model assembly lines [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,127(1):203-216.
    [98]Inman R R, Bulfin R L. Sequencing JIT mixed model assembly lines [J]. Management Science,1991,37:901-904.
    [99]Steiner G, Yeomans J S. Level schedules for mixed-model, just-in-time processes [J]. Management Science,1993,39:728-735.
    [100]Bautista J, Companys R, Corominas A. Heuristics and exact algorithms for solving the Monden problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1996b,88: 101-131.
    [101]Moreno N, Corominas A. Solving the minmax product rate variation problem (PRVP) as a bottleneck assignment problem [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2006,33:928-939.
    [102]Dahmada T N, Kubiak W. A brief survey of just-in-time sequencing for mixed-model systems [J]. International Journal of Operations Research,2005,2: 38-47.
    [103]Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A. Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines:Survey, classification and model critique [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009,192:349-373.
    [104]Dar-El E M, Cother R F. Assembly line sequencing for model mix [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1975,13:463-477.
    [105]Dar-El E M. Mixed-model assembly line sequencing problems [J]. OMEGA,1978, 6:313-323.
    [106]Dar-El E M, Cucuy S. Optimal model-mixed sequencing for balanced assembly lines [J]. OMEGA,1977,5:333-341.
    [107]Dar-El E M, Nadivi A. A mixed-model sequencing application [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1981,19:69-84.
    [108]Kim Y K, Hyun C J, Kim Y. Sequencing in mixed model assembly lines:A genetic algorithm approach [J]. Computers & Operations Research,1996,23:1131-1145.
    [109]Goldschmidt O, Bard J F, Takvorian A. Complexity results for mixed-model assembly lines with approximation algorithms for the single station case [J]. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,1997,9:251-272.
    [110]Bard J F, Stub A, Joshi S B. Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines to level parts usage and minimize line length [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 1994,32:2431-2454.
    [111]Okamura K, Yamashina H. A heuristic algorithm for the assembly line model-mix sequencing problem to minimize the risk of stopping the conveyor [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1979,17(3):233-247.
    [112]Xiaobo Z, Ohno K. Propertities of a sequencing problem for a mixed model assembly line with conveyor stoppages [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,124(3):560-570.
    [113]Xiaobo Z, Ohno K. Algorithms for sequencing mixed models on an assembly line in a JIT production system [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1997,32:47-56.
    [114]Celano G, Costa A, Fichera S, Perrone G. Human factor policy testing in sequencing of manual mixed model assembly lines [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2004,31:39-59.
    [115]Yano C A, Bolat A. Survey, development, and application of algorithms for sequencing paced assembly lines [J]. Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management,1989,2:172-198.
    [116]Yano C A, Rachamadugu R. Sequencing to minimize work overload in assembly lines with product options [J]. Management Science,1991,37(5):572-586.
    [117]Tsai L-H. Mixed-model sequencing to minimize utility work and the risk of conveyor stoppage [J]. Management Science,1995,41:485-495.
    [118]Scholl A, Klein R, Domschke W. Pattern based vocabulary building for effectively sequencing mixed-model assembly lines [J]. Journal of Heuristics,1998,4: 359-381.
    [119]Sumichrast R T, Russell R S, Taylor B W. A comparative analysis of sequencing procedures for mixed-model assembly lines in a just-in-time production system [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1992,30:199-214.
    [120]Caridi M, Sianesi A. Multi-agent systems in production planning and control:An application to the scheduling of mixed-model assembly lines [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2000,68:29-42.
    [121]Sumichrast R T, Oxenrider K A, Clayton E R. An evolutionary algorithm for sequencing production on a paced assembly line [J]. Decision Science,2000,31: 149-172.
    [122]Parrello B, Kabat W, Wos L. Job-shop scheduling using automated reasoning:A case study of the car-sequencing problem [J]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1986,2:1-42.
    [123]Hindi K S, Ploszajski G. Formulation and Solution of a Selection and Sequencing Problem in Car Manufacture [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,1994,2: 203-211.
    [124]Smith K, Palaniswami M, Krishnamoorthy M. Traditional heuristic versus Hopfield neural network approach to a car sequencing problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1996,93:300-316.
    [125]Fliedner M, Boysen N. Solving the car sequencing problem via branch and bound [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.045.
    [126]Boysen N, Fliedner M. Comment on Gravel M, Gagne T C, Price W L.,2005. Review and comparison of three methods for the solution of the car sequencing problem [J]. Journal of the Operational Research,2006b,57:1497-1498.
    [127]Gravel M, Gagne C, Price W L. Review and comparison of the three methods for the solution of the car sequencing problem [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society,2005,56:1287-1295.
    [128]Kis T. On the complexity of the car sequencing problem [J]. Operations Research Letters,2004,32:331-335.
    [129]Solnon C, Cung V D, Nguyen A, et al. The car sequencing problem:Overview of the state-of-the-art methods and industrial case-study of the ROADEF'2005 challenge problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,191(3): 912-927.
    [130]Miltenburg G J, Goldstein T. Developing production schedules which balance part uasge and smooth production loads for just-in-time production systems [J]. Naval Research Logistics,1991,38:893-910.
    [131]Zhuqi X, Shusaku H. A study on sequencing method for the mixed-model assembly line in just-in-time production systems [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1994,27:225-228.
    [132]Bolat A. Sequencing job on an automobile assembly line:Objectives and procedures [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1994,32:1219-1236.
    [133]Aigbedo H, Monden Y. A parametric procedure for multicriterion sequence scheduling for just-in-time mixed-model assembly lines [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1997,35:2543-2564.
    [134]Hyun C J, Kim Y, Kim Y K. A genetic algorithm for multiple objective sequencing problems in mixed model assembly lines [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1998,25:675-690.
    [135]Tamura T, Long H, Ohno K. A sequencing problem to level part usage rates and work loads for a mixed-model assembly line with a bypass subline [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,1999,60:557-564.
    [136]Celano G, Fichera S, Grasso V, et al. An evolutionary approach to multi-objective scheduling of mixed-model assembly lines [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1999,37:69-73.
    [137]Zeramdini W, Aigbedo H, Monden Y. Bicriteria sequencing for just-in-time mixed-model assembly lines [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2000, 38(15):3451-3470.
    [138]Kim Y K, Kim J Y, Kim Y. A coevolutionary algorithm for balancing and sequencing in mixed model assembly lines [J]. Applied Intelligence,2000a,13: 247-258.
    [139]McMullen P R, Frazier G V. A simulated annealing approach to mixed-model sequencing with multiple objectives on a just-in-time line [J]. HE Transactions, 2000,32:679-686.
    [140]Lovgren R H, Racer M J. Algorithms for mixed-model sequencing with due date restrictions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,120:408-422.
    [141]Kim Y K, Kim S J, Kim J Y. Balancing and sequencing mixed-model U-lines with a co-evolutionary algorithm [J]. Production Planning & Control,2000b,11:754-764.
    [142]McMullen P R, Tarasewich P, Frazier G V. Using genetic algorithms to solve the multi-product JIT sequencing problem with set-ups [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2000,38:2653-2670.
    [143]McMullen P R. An efficient frontier approach to addressing JIT sequencing problems with setups via search heuristics [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2001b,41:335-353.
    [144]McMullen P R. A Kohonen self-organizing map approach to addressing a multiple objective, mixed-model JIT sequencing problem [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2001c,72:59-71.
    [145]McMullen P R. An ant colony optimization approach to addressing a JIT sequencing problem with multiple objectives [J]. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering,2001a,15:309-317.
    [146]Korkmazel T, Meral S. Bicriteria sequencing methods for the mixed-model assembly line in just-in-time production systems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001,131:188-207.
    [147]Ventura J A, Radhakrishnan S. Sequencing mixed model assembly lines for a just-in-time production system [J]. Production Planning & Control,2002,13(2): 199-210.
    [148]Mane A, Nahavandi S,Zhang J. Sequencing production on an assembly line using goal chasing and user defined algorithm [C]. In:Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference,2002, pp.1269-1273.
    [149]Miltenburg J. Balancing and scheduling mixed-model U-shaped production lines [J]. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,2002,14:119-151.
    [150]Kotani S, Ito T, Ohno K. Sequencing problem for a mixed assembly line in the Toyota production system [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2004, 42:4955-4974.
    [151]McMullen P R, Tarasewich P. A beam search heuristic method for mixed-model scheduling with setups [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2005,96: 273-283.
    [152]Mansouri S A. A Muti-objective genetic algorithm for mixed-model sequencing on JIT assembly lines [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2005,167: 696-716.
    [153]Yoo J K, Shimizu Y, Hino R. A sequencing problem for mixed-model assembly line with the aid of relief-man [J]. JSME International Journal, Serie C,2005,48:15-20.
    [154]Ding F Y, Zhu J, Sun H. Comparing two weighted approaches for sequencing mixed-model assembly lines with multiple objectives [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2006,102:108-131.
    [155]Kim Y K, Kim J Y, Kim Y. An endosymbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the integration of balancing and sequencing in mixed-model U-lines [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,168:838-852.
    [156]Drexl A, Kimms A, MatthieBen L. Algorithms for the car sequencing and the level scheduling problem [J]. Journal of Scheduling,2006,9:153-176.
    [157]Bock S, Rosenberg 0, Brackel T V. Controlling mixed-model assembly lines in real-time by using distributed systems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,168:880-904.
    [158]Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Rahimi-Vahed A R. Multi-criteria sequencing problem for a mixed-model assembly line in a JIT production system [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation,2006,181:1471-1481.
    [159]Mohammadi G, Ozbayrak M. Scheduling mixed-model final assembly lines in JIT manufacturing [J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2006,19:377-382.
    [160]Yu J, Yin Y, Chen Z. Scheduling of an assembly line with a multi-objective genetic algorithm [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2006, 28:551-555.
    [161]Kara Y, Ozcan U, Peker A. An approach for balancing and sequencing mixed-model JIT U-lines [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies,2007,32:1218-1231.
    [162]Gagne C, Gravel M, Price W L. Solving real car sequencing problems with ant colony optimization [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174: 1427-1448.
    [163]Ribeiro C C, Aloise D, Noronha T F, et al. A hybrid heuristic for a multi-objective real-life car sequencing problem with painting and assembly line constraints [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,191:981-992.
    [164]Janiak A, Kozan E, Lichtenstein, et al. Metaheuristic approaches to the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with a cost-related criterion [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2007, (105):407-424.
    [165]Huang P Y. A comparative study of priority dispatching rules in a hybrid assembly/job shop [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1984,22(3): 375-387.
    [166]Fry T D, Oliff M D, Minor E D, et al. The effects of product structure and sequencing rule on assembly shop performance [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1989,27(4):671-686.
    [167]Cheng T C E. Analysis of material flow in a job shop with assembly operations [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1990,28(7):1369-1383.
    [168]Philipoom P R, Russell R S, Fry T D. A preliminary investigation of multi-attribute based sequencing rules for assembly shops [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1991,29(4):739-753.
    [169]Doctor S R, Cavalier T M, Egbelu P J. Scheduling for machining and assembly in a job-shop environment [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1993,31(6): 1275-1297.
    [170]McKoy D H C, Egbelu P J. Minimizing production flow time in a process and assembly job shop [J]. International Journal of Production Research,1998,36(8): 2315-2332.
    [171]Kolisch R. Integration of assembly and fabrication for make-to-order production [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2000,68:287-306.
    [172]Thiagarajan S, Rajendran C. Scheduling in dynamic assembly job-shops with jobs having different holding and tardiness costs [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2003,41(18):4453-4486.
    [173]Thiagarajan S, Rajendran C. Scheduling in dynamic assembly job-shops to minimize the sum of weighted earliness, weighted tardiness and weighted flowtime of jobs [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2005,49:463-503.
    [174]Gaafar L K, Masoud S A. Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing for scheduling in agile manufacturing [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2005,43(14):3069-3085.
    [175]Lee C Y, Cheng T C E, Lin B M T. Mininizing the makespan in the 3-machine assembly-type flowshop scheduling problem [J]. Management Science,1993,39(5): 616-625.
    [176]Potts C N, Sevast'Janov S V, Strusevich V A, et al. The two-stage assembly scheduling problem:Complexity and approximation [J]. Operations Research,1995, 43(2):346-355.
    [177]Hariri A M A, Potts C N. A branch and bound algorithm for the two-stage assembly scheduling problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997,103: 547-556.
    [178]Cheng T C E, Wang G. Scheduling the fabrication and assembly of components in a two-machine flowshop [J]. ⅡE Transactions,1999,31:135-143.
    [179]Yokoyama M. Hybrid flow-shop scheduling with assembly operations [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2001,73:103-116.
    [180]Yokoyama M, Santos D L. Three-stage flow-shop scheduling with assembly operations to minimize the weighted sum of product completion times[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2005,161:754-770.
    [181]Cao D, Chen M. A mixed integer programming model for a two line CONWIP-based production and assembly system [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2005,95:317-326.
    [182]Yokoyama M. Flow-shop scheduling with setup and assembly operations [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,187:1184-1195.
    [183]Wagner H M, Whitin T M. Dynamic version of the economic lot size model [J]. Management Science,1958,5:89-96.
    [184]Karimi B, Fatemi Ghomi S M T, Wilson J M. The capacitated lot sizing problem:a review of models and algorithms [J]. Omega,2003,31:365-378.
    [185]Jans R, Degraeve Z. Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing:a review and comparison of solution approaches [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007,177:1855-1875.
    [186]Ben-Daya M, Darwish M, Ertogral K. The joint economic lot sizing problem: review and extensions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008,185: 726-742.
    [187]Quadt D, Kuhn H. Capacitated lot-sizing with extensions:a review [J].4OR:A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research,2008,6:61-83.
    [188]Absi N. Models and methods for capacitated lot-sizing problems [J].4OR:A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research,2008,6:311-314.
    [189]Robinson P, Narayanan A, Sahin F. Coordinate deterministic dynamic demand lot-sizing problem:a review of models and algorithms [J]. Omega,2009,37:3-15.
    [190]Ouenniche J, Boctor F F, Martel A. The impact of sequencing decisions on multi-item lot sizing and scheduling in flow shops [J]. International Journal of Productiob Research,1999,37(10):2253-2270.
    [191]Aras 0 A, Swanson L A. A lot sizing and sequencing algorithm for dynamic demands upon a single facility [J]. Journal of Operations Management,1982,2(3): 177-185.
    [192]Gupta D, Magnusson T. The capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup costs and setup times [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2005,32:727-747.
    [193]Beraldi P, Ghiani G, Grieco A, et al. Rolling-horizon and fix-and-relax heuristics for the parallel machine lot-sizing and scheduling problem with sequence-dependent set-up costs [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2008,35:3644-3656.
    [194]Clark A R. Batch sequencing and sizing with regular varying demand [J]. Production Planning and Control,1998,9(3):260-266.
    [195]Clark A R, Clark S J. Rolling-horizon lot-sizing when set-up times are sequence dependent [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2000,38(10): 2287-2308.
    [196]Meyr H. Simultaneous lot-sizing and scheduling on parallel machines [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2002,139:277-92.
    [197]Meyr H. Simultaneous lot-sizing and scheduling by combining local search with dual optimization [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2000,120: 311-26.
    [198]Fleischmann B, Meyr H. The general lot sizing and scheduling problem [J]. OR Spektrum,1997,19(1):11-21.
    [199]Staggemeier AT, Clark AR, Aickelin U, et al. A hybrid genetic algorithm to solve a lot-sizing and scheduling problem [R]. Report MS-2002-4, Intelligent Computer Systems Centre Group, University of the West of England, Bristol, Great Britain, 2002.
    [200]Marinelli F, Nenni M E, Sforza A. Capacitated lot sizing and scheduling with parallel machines and shared buffers:a case study in a packaging company [J]. Annals of Operations Research,2007,150:177-192.
    [201]Sikora R, Chhajed D, Shaw M. Integrating the lot sizing and sequencing decisions for scheduling a capacitated flow line [J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1996,30:659-679.
    [202]Sikora R. A genetic algorithm for integrating lot sizing and sequencing in scheduling a capacitated flow line [J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1996,30:969-981.
    [203]Ponnambalam S G, Mohan Reddy M. A GA-SA multiobjective hybrid search algorithm for integrating lot sizing and sequencing in flow-line scheduling [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2003,21:126-137.
    [204]Dolgui A, Levin G, Louly M A. Decomposition approach for a problem of lot-sizing and sequencing under uncertainties [J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2005,18(5):376-385.
    [205]Akrami B, Karimi B, Moattar Hosseini S M. Two metaheuristic methods for the common cycle economic lot sizing and scheduling in flexible flow shops with limited intermediate buffers:The finite horizon case [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation,2006,183:634-645.
    [206]De Matta R, Guignard M. Studying the effects of production loss due to set-up in dynamic production scheduling [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1994,72:62-73.
    [207]De Matta R, Guignard M. The performance of rolling production schedules in a process industry [J]. ⅡE Transactions,1995,27:564-573.
    [208]Ferreira D, Morabito R, Rangel S. Solution approaches for the soft drink integrated production lot sizing and scheduling problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2009,196(2):697-706.
    [209]Drexl A, Kimms A. Lot sizing and scheduling, survey and extensions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1997,99:221-35.
    [210]Staggemeier A T, Clark A R. A survey of lot-sizing and scheduling models [C]. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual symposium of the Brazilian operational research society, Brazil,2001.
    [211]Gupta J N D. Two-stage hybrid flowshop scheduling problem [J]. Operations Research Society,1988,39:359-364.
    [212]Sawik T. Mixed integer programming for scheduling flexible flow lines with limited intermediate buffers [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2000,31:39-52.
    [213]Wardono B, Fathi Y. A tabu search algorithm for the multi-stage parallel machine problem with limited buffer capacities [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,155:380-401.
    [214]Wang X, Tang L. A tabu search heuristic for the hybrid flowshop scheduling with finite intermediate buffers [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2009,36: 907-918.
    [215]Holland J H. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems [M]. Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,1975.
    [216]Goldberg D E. Genetic algorithms in search optimisation and machine learning [M]. Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley, Reading,1989.
    [217]Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C D, Vecchi M P. Optimization by simulated annealing [J]. Science,1983,220(4598):671-680.
    [218]Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A W, Rosenbluth M N, et al. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1953,21(6):1087-1092.
    [219]Wang L, Zheng D Z. An effective hybrid heuristic for flow shop scheduling [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2003,21(1):38-44.
    [220]Wardono B, Fathi Y. A tabu search algorithm for the multi-stage parallel machine problem with limited buffer capacities [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004,155:380-401.
    [221]Wittrock R J. An adaptable scheduling algorithm for flexible flow lines [J]. Operations Research,1988,36:445-453.
    [222]Sawik T J. A scheduling algorithm for flexible flow lines with limited intermediate buffers [J]. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis,1993,9:127-138.
    [223]Hausdorff F. Set Theory [M]. New York:Chelsea,1957.
    [224]Schaffer J D. Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms [C]. In:Proceedings of the first International Conference on Genetic Algorithms,1985, pp:93-100.
    [225]Horn J, Nafpliotis N, Goldberg D E. A niched pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization [C]. In:Proceedings of the first IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway USA,1994, pp:82-87.
    [226]Srinivas N, Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithms [J]. Evolutionary Computation,1994,2(3):221-248.
    [227]Zitzler E, Thiele L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms:a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation,1999,3(4):257-271.
    [228]Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L. SPEA2:improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm [R]. TIK-Report 103,2001.
    [229]Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm NSGA-II [J]. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation,2002,6(2): 182-197.
    [230]郭秀萍.多目标进化算法及其在制造系统中的应用研究[D].博士学位论文,上海交通大学,2007.
    [231]Glover F. Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence [J]. Computers & Operations Research,1986,13:533-549.
    [232]Hansen P. The steepest ascent mildest decent heuristic for combinatorial programming [C]. Congress on Numerial Methods in Combinatorial Optimization, Capri, Italy,1986.
    [233]Glover F. Tabu thresholding:Improved search by nonmonotonic trajectories [J]. ORSA Journal on Computing,1995,7(4):426-442.
    [234]Brucker P. Scheduling Algorithms [M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1995.
    [235]Woodruff D L. Simulated annealing and tabu search:Lessons from a line search [J]. Computers & Operations Research,1994,21(8):823-839.
    [236]Ten Eikelder H M M, Aarts B J M, Verhoeven M G A, et al. Sequential and parallel local search algorithms for job shop scheduling [C]. In:Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Meta-heuristics, Sophia-Antipolis, France,1997, pp. 21-24.
    [237]Anderson J. Mechanism for Local Search [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1996,88:139-151.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700