用户名: 密码: 验证码:
巴楚隆起断裂构造特征及演化
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文研究区巴楚隆起位于新疆塔里木盆地中央隆起西段。巴楚隆起断裂构造带非常发育,区内局部构造的发育规模和展布均与断裂或断裂带有关,以背斜、断背斜、断鼻等基本构造类型为主。全面深入地研究巴楚隆起的构造格架、断裂构造带发育与分布特征、断裂带构造样式与圈闭类型及分布、断裂带形成演化(活动期次、发育模式等)及相互关,对整个塔中地区的勘探开发具有重要意义。
     研究认为,巴楚隆起具有“东西分区;南北分带”区域构造格架和复杂的断裂统。大致以阿恰断裂-古董山断裂-鸟山断裂带(构造变换带)为界可分为东部和西部两个构造变形区;构造单元划分可划分为四个:西部断褶区、中部凹陷区、东北部断褶区和东南部断褶区。
     巴楚隆起在加里东、海西、印支—燕山、喜马拉雅等多期、多种构造应力作用下形成了复杂的叠加构造样式。以高角度基底卷入型为主、叠加盖层滑脱型压扭性断裂的构造样式。巴楚隆起长期发育的基底卷入式断裂,走滑特征明显。
     巴楚隆起不同断裂带或同一断裂带的不同地段断裂的形成时间、活动期次、性质、强度和活动方式等均存在有较大差异。断裂带从加里东中晚期开始活动,强烈活动期为晚海西期和喜山期,海西期断裂可能经历了先张后压的演化;而麦盖提斜坡和中部强烈隆起带主要形成于喜山中晚期的强烈挤压和隆升作用。
     隆起南部断裂带是油气长期运移的指向区,背冲、滑脱上、下叠置的复合构造样式有利于强变形背景下的油气的规模聚集与有效保存。巴楚隆起区古构造圈闭、寒武盐下、盐间构造圈闭及沿古近膏泥岩、寒武膏岩层逆冲推覆断裂下盘构造圈闭是该区重要的勘探方向。
     通过对巴楚隆起构造演化、构造样式、圈闭类型、不整合及构造应力场分布、沉积相、储盖层和烃源岩等项研究成果,对巴楚地区的构造演化与油气成藏条件进行了综合分析评价,指出了该地区油气聚集有利区带。
In this study area Bachu uplift is located in the Western central uplift of Tarim Basin.Fault belts are very developed in the Bachu uplift. The development and the distribution of structures in the local region are related to fractures or faults.Anticline,faulted anticline and faulted nose are the basic structural types of study area. Detailed study on the structural framework,development and distribution of fault zones,structural styles,distribution and styles of traps,formation and evolution of fault zones (active stage, development model) and their relationships,which is of great significance to the exploration and development of the area.
     Studies suggest that The tectonic framework of Bachu area presented as "west-easterentiation and north-south dissimilitude".The uplift developed faults and complex fault system. It can be roughly divided into eastern and the western tectonic deformation zones by A Qia fault - Gu Dong Shan fault - Niao Shan fault zone (tectonic transformation zone).Tectonic units can be divided into four part: the western fault-fold zone,the central depressed area, northeast of fault-fold zone and the southeast fault-fold zone.
     Bachu uplift experienced multi-phase,multi-tectonic stress during the Caledonian, Hercynian,Indo-Yanshan,Himalayan period which resulted in complex superimposed structural styles. The structural styles which are composed of high-angle basement involved type and cap slipping type were dominated by the former. Basement-involved style long-term developed in Bachu uplift,and had an obvious fault slip characteristics.
     Different faults zone or different sections of the fault zone of Bachu uplift have the quite difference in the formation time, active stage, the nature, intensity and modes. Fault zones started to move from the middle and late Caledonian event,a strong active stages are in the late Hercynian and Himalayan period. Hercynian faults may have experienced the evolution of earlier extensional and later compressional;The Markit slopes and a strong central uplift mainly formed in the late Himalayan by the strong compressional and uplifting process.
     The southern fault zone of Uplift is a long-term oil and gas migration area, back-thrusting,slip the upper and lower superimposed composite structural style is favoured of oil and gas gathering and effective preservation in a strong deformation settings. Ancient paleo-structural traps,the structural traps of Cambrian salt and structural trap under the thrust fault which along the lines of Paleogene gypsum mudstone,Cambrian rock salt layer is the important exploration area.
     Through research results in Bachu uplift tectonic evolution,structrual styles,types of trap,unconformity and the tectonic stress field distribution, sedimentary facies,reservoir and cap rocks and source rocks,we evaluated the tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Bachu area,and pointed out the favorable region of oil and gas accumulation zone.
引文
CARDOZO N,BHALLA K,ZEHNDER T,ALLMENDINGER R W.Mechanical models of fault propagation folds and comparison to the trishear kinematic model[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2003,25:1-18
    ERICKSON G,SUPPE J,HARDY S.Sequential restoration and unstraining of structural cross sections:applications to extensional[J].Bulletin AmericanAssociation of Petroleum Geologists,2000,84:234-249
    ERICKSON S G,STRAYER L M,SUPPE J.Initiation and reactivation of faults during movement over a thrust-fault ramp:Numerical mechanical models[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2001,23:11-23
    MCCONNELL D A.Fixed-hinge basement-involved fault-propagation folds,Wyoming[J],Geological Society of America Bulletin,1994,106:1583-1593
    N.B.伍德华特,S.E.博耶,J.萨普.平衡地质剖面(贾维民,杜秀霞译)[M].中国地质大学出版社.1991.1-249
    P.A.艾伦,J.R.艾伦著.盆地分析—原理及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.1-339
    ROUBY D,SUPPE J,XIAO H.Folding and faulting mechanism in 3D-Restoration of folded and faulted surfaces[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,,2000,84:805-829
    SHAW J H,CONNORS C,SUPPE J.Seismic interpretation of contractional fault-related folds:An AAPG seismic atlas[M],American Association of Petroleum Geologists Special Publication,2004,1-270
    SUPPE J,MEDWEDEFF D A.Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folding[J].Eclog.Geol.Helv.1990,83(Laubscher vol.):409-454
    SUPPE J.Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding[J].Amer.Jour.Sci.,1983,283:684-721.
    T.P.Harding,and J.D.Lowell.Structural styles,their plate-tectonic habitats,and hydrocarbon traps in petroleum provinces.AAPG;July 1979;v.63;no.7;1016-1058
    安作相,马纪.断裂与渤海湾盆地形成和油气的关.2001.油气地质与采收率.8(1).1-4
    操成杰,周新桂,何彬,等.苏北盆地天长箕状断陷断裂体及油气成藏规律.2003.地质力学学报,9(1).18-22
    陈发景,汪新文,张光亚.新疆塔里木盆地北部构造演化与油气关研究[R].中国地质大学(北京),1994,10.1-246
    陈剑,卢华复,于景宗,等.断层相关褶皱的几何学模型及其应用[J].地球学报,2005,(1).89-92
    陈强路等,塔里木盆地巴楚隆起构造演化与含油气性分析,2007.12.1-173
    丁文龙,林畅松,漆立新,等.塔里木盆地巴楚隆起构造格架及形成演化[J].地学前缘,2008,(2).242-251
    付建奎,张光亚,马郡,等.塔里木盆地巴楚地区构造样式与演化[J].石油勘探与发,1999,(5).10-11
    何登发,李德生,吕修祥.中国西北地区含油气盆地构造类型[J].石油学报,1996,(4).182-192
    何登发.塔里木盆地的地层不整合面与油气聚集[J].石油学报,1995,(3).15-21.
    何登发.塔里木盆地新生代构造演化与油气聚集[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,(3).1-8.
    李洪辉,张光亚,刘建新,等.塔里木盆地巴楚断隆油气勘探模式[J].石油勘探与发,1998,(5).11-13
    李艺斌,李罗照,姜衍文,等.关于巴楚运动的几点认识[J].新疆石油地质,1995,(2).173-176
    李曰俊,吴根耀,孟庆龙,等.塔里木西部地区古生代断裂活动的方式和机制[J].地质科学,2008,(4).727-745
    林畅松,丁文龙,刘景彦.塔里木盆地形成演化和构造作用[R].中国地质大学(北京),2007,7.1-312
    刘高波,施泽进,佘晓宇.巴楚-麦盖提的区域构造演化与油气分布规律[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,(2).157-161
    刘光炎,蒋录全.平衡剖面技术与地震资料解释[J].石油地球物理勘探,1995,30(6):833-844
    刘和甫.沉积盆地地球动力学分类及构造样式[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1993,18(6):699-724
    刘志宏,林东成,王文革,等.塔里木盆地吐木休克断裂带的研究[J].长春科技大学学报,2001,(3).219-223
    刘志宏,王孔伟,迟元林,等.塔里木盆地阿瓦提-巴楚地区褶皱构造特征[J].地质科学,2004,(2).251-259
    刘志宏,王文革,林东成,等.塔里木盆地吐木休克断裂带断层封闭性研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,(1).19-25
    陆先亮,渤海湾盆地新生代断裂活动及其对含油气统和油气分布的影响.油气地质与采收率.2005.31-35
    毛小平,吴冲龙,袁艳斌.地质构造的物理平衡剖面法[J].地球科学.1998,23(2):167-170
    孟庆龙,李曰俊,敬兵,等.塔里木盆地西部巴什托普断裂的主要特征及其油气勘探意义[J].地质科学,2008,(3).569-575
    孟庆龙,李曰俊,师骏,等.塔里木盆地西部色力布亚断裂和康西断裂的主要特征及活动时代[J].地质科学,2008,(2).282-293
    汤良杰.塔里木盆地构造演化与构造样式[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1994,(6).p.742-754
    王婧韫,宋慧利,王正斌,等.东濮凹陷断裂体及其意义.2004.石油地球物理勘探,第39卷第6期.724-729
    王燮培,费琪,张家哗.1990.石油勘探构造分析.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1-274.
    肖安成,李景义,张春生.塔里木盆地色力布亚断裂的走滑双重构造特征[J].江汉石油学院学报,1998,(2).6-12
    肖安成,杨树锋,李曰俊,王清华,陈汉林,程晓敢.塔里木盆地巴楚隆起断裂统主要形成时代的新认识[J].地质科学,2005,(2).291-302
    谢晓安,胡素云,卢华复.探讨塔里木盆地巴楚断隆的正反转构造[J].地质论评,1998,(1).1-6
    杨庚,石昕,贾承造,等.塔里木盆地西北缘柯坪-巴楚地区皮羌断裂与色力布亚断裂空间关[J].铀矿地质,2008,(4).201-207
    杨海军,李曰俊,冯晓军,等.塔里木盆地玛扎塔格构造带断裂构造分析[J].地质科学,2007,(3).506-517
    杨克绳,房昌蓉.塔里木盆地地震构造样式及其油气勘探意义[J].海相油气地质,1996,(4).5-9
    曾联波,金之钧,李京昌,等.柴达木盆地北缘断裂构造分形特征与油气分布关研究.2001.地质科学,36(2):241-247
    张进,张庆龙,任文军,等.断层相关褶皱--鄂尔多斯盆地中的新构造样式[J].石油实验地质,1999,(1).61-65
    张进铎,平衡剖面技术在国内外油气勘探中的最新应用[J].地球物理学进展,2007,(6).1856-1861
    赵明,孙兆玉,岳勇,等.巴楚隆起西段色力布亚断裂演化及其封闭性研究[J].石油天然气学报,2008,(4).28-32
    朱德丰,刘和甫,吴根耀.塔里木盆地西部吐木休克断裂带的主要特征和构造演化[J].地质学,2008,(2).209-227

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700